"Into the Badlands'" teen hunk Aramis Knight

Exhibit B:

Nice pits.

Does he like to swim?

What? Jesus, I feel old and gross looking at his photos. Now Daniel Wu is smoking hot.

One of the top Google results was him fawning over his gf. Boring.

Muriel not only tolerates that people make a thread exposing a minor to the lustful feelings of DL's denizens, but she also adds such tags as "Hotness" to the thread.

Yes, r6 - Aramis and his shirtless promo pics must be protected from our lustful gaze!

house cunts went crazy when I posted it on my FB page First time he kissed a boy --- tittle tells all two boys kissing

R7 = Proud pedo.

r9

A pedo would be grossed out by the pic at r2.

Is this where we're discussing Into the Badlands? I watched the first two episodes and am quite enjoying it.

It looked sort or melodramatic from the previews and I'm leery of the effects, since TV shows have notoriously bad CGI. Also, what time period is it in where white people and martial arts co-exist?

It's set in a post-apocalyptic future, R12.

A mother and daughter ogled Aramis when he was taking a bath in the last episode.

R10

Oh sorry, I knew the correct term is hebephile. No offense intended.

In Aramis' case it would be "ephebophile", r15. But I guess that distiction is merely academic to you as well. 6-year-olds, 16-year-olds - what's the big difference?

His character is pretty annoying on the show and his acting is iffy.

He's best friend's with one of the many jail bait obsessions on this site Dylan Sprayberry.

[quote] In Aramis' case it would be "ephebophile", [R15]. But I guess that distiction is merely academic to you as well. 6-year-olds, 16-year-olds - what's the big difference?

Oh dear, do you think you're helping yourself? All of these -philes mean more or less the same thing - that you're gross and should be in jail, not on DL seeking to get more people to lust after minors.

You have issues R19. Thinking a 16 year old or 17 year old attractive is neither gross nor a jailable offense. You realize you are not actually sleeping with that person right or even trying to sleep with that person? They are a sexually mature being, we have eyes, there is nothing unusual about the observation.

Nothing magically changes at the age of 18 except for law deciding it is is legal to act on it (well depending on the jurisdication 16 or 17 could actually be legal).

You have a childish perspective. I work with college kids, I can acknowledge many are attractive while also knowing I would never go there.

R20

[quote] Nothing magically changes at the age of 18 except for law deciding it is is legal to act on it (well depending on the jurisdication 16 or 17 could actually be legal).

No joke I have seen many online pedos make that same argument.

Well that makes no sense. The same analogy doesn't even work because something does magically change, it's called puberty.

Pedophilia is being attracted to prepubescent children. They are not sexual beings and are not meant to be found attractive.

R22

The corollary to your argument is that the second someone gets past puberty, he's fair play for ogling and lust on the part of adults.

Most people do by age 13. (Myself, I did at 11.) By your argument, we should all be lusting for these kids that age.

That argument - that past puberty all is allowed - I have heard numerous times from online pedo activists. Sorry, hebephile activists.

I really don't care what you call yourself - pedophile, ephebophile, etc. You're gross all the same.

[quote]The corollary to your argument is that the second someone gets past puberty, he's fair play for ogling and lust on the part of adults.

Obviously it is a gray area dear, that is why there are age of consent laws to make it clear cut. You'll notice in the United States it ranges from 16 to 18 as when society has decided that someone is a sexually mature being.

I don't even understand your point and this argument is silly.

Sooooo, about that show...

Good show, cute boy. He's all ass and armpits.

OP, don't call an underage child a "hunk." Creepy.

Do we need to wait until he's 18 to admire him? Why didn't we need to wait for Nolan Gould, Shawn Mendes, or Alex from Target?

Did we really admire Nolan Gould?

OP is creepy. End of.

[quote]what time period is it in where white people and martial arts co-exist?[/quote] The same time period the Netflix miniseries bomb "Marco Polo" was set in, I imagine.

Touché, R30.

BTW, you can end the quote by doing a double return. You don't need any additional markup.

Also, I think Marco Polo was well received. It did get awfully slow in some parts, but I certainly enjoyed it lol

What a nice fresh young man

r18

They're so cute together.

They certainly are!

All of OP's threads have been about boys, sorry I mean "men", who look 15.

I thought there was pedophilic websites out there that cater to them. So why come here?

I was going to make a joke about kid named Jovan Pawn, but then things got all creepy up in here.

I don't know the age of the OP, but I imagine he's old enough to make ogling at this kid weird. I also don't care if this young man is of legal age, he still looks like a 16 years-old in that photo. So technically, this wouldn't be pedophilia, child porn etc..

HOWEVER....it's still creepy as fuck and the age defense confirms that.

It's funny, for a quick second, when I opened this thread, I thought the guy was a dead ringer for Tyler Posey (MTV's Teen Wolf) and low and behold there are pics of Aramis Knight and Tyler Posey's Teen Wolf colleague Dylan Sprayberry.

Dang it. Lo and behold!

Omg R20.

You're disgusting

Wanna bet R20 wasn't being honest when he said he works with "COLLEGE kids"?

OP practically came out as a pervert with this comment:

[quote] In Aramis' case it would be "ephebophile", [R15]. But I guess that distiction is merely academic to you as well.

Obviously, the distinction between pedophile and ephebophile are not merely academic for him, because he's one.

The following is also the justification that online perverts have used to share child pics online ("who cares, no one's getting hurt! It's not sex, it's just a bit of skin"):

[quote] You have issues [R19]. Thinking a 16 year old or 17 year old attractive is neither gross nor a jailable offense. You realize you are not actually sleeping with that person right or even trying to sleep with that person?

And this:

[quote] Nothing magically changes at the age of 18 except for law deciding it is is legal to act on it (well depending on the jurisdication 16 or 17 could actually be legal).

"Nothing magically changes between the ages of 16 or 17 and 18! Let's all lust after 16 year olds, then!"

A few months later:

"Nothing magically changes between the ages of 14 or 15 and 15! Let's all lust after 14 year olds, then!"

And: "Nothing magically changes between the ages of 12 or 13 and 14! Let's all lust after 12 year olds, then!"

"Hey, did you know some 11 year olds are already in puberty? They're sexual beings, too, y'know?"

And some time later: "What's the difference between 9 10 year olds and 11 year olds? You wouldn't recognize the difference just looking at them!"

Etc.

I think 14, 15, 16 are very magical ages

They certainly poured on the baby oil for his shirtless scenes in the last episode. He was glistening in the moonlight, as twinks are wont to do.

engaged to Dustin Lance Black in 3....2.......1......

Someone get him some ProActiv!

Bit too twinky for my tastes.

It's funny how other developed countries like Germany and Italy, have decided the AOC is 14 yrs while others is 18. What makes German and Italian teens able to make the decision to have sex? And there is no close in age restrictions either, a 50 yr old can fuck a 14 yr old if the teen wants to.

Pedo.

R50 America was founded by puritans. It’s in our National DNA.

He's 21 years old...not a minor.

I wonder how his sister, Chanel No. 5, is doing?

R53 The OP was from 2015. He's fair game now.

R53 Yep. I just looked him up and was about to say the same thing. There sure have been some incest survivors loudly accusing everyone around them of being a pedo lately. I guess with no recent Woody Allen or Kevin Spacey threads, the trolls have gotten bored and are bringing their patented brand of crazy to other more obscure threads. Smells like fish.