Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

The Night Porter (1974)

It's considered such a powerful and important film but I can never get past the first 15 minutes. It's so draggy.

The moment Charlotte Rampling recognises Dirk Bogarde at the reception desk is indeed powerful, but it's downhill from there as far as I'm concerned.

What's your take?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19October 6, 2018 5:54 PM

It couldn't be made today. Organized protests by Jews and women would shut that whole thing down now.

by Anonymousreply 1September 28, 2015 10:41 PM

You're kidding! One post for Night Porter?

by Anonymousreply 2October 1, 2015 3:22 PM

I saw it around '75 in a Times Square porno house.

by Anonymousreply 3October 1, 2015 3:28 PM

It was never considered powerful or important! Most middle-brow and high-brow critics of the time considered it amusing or vulgar trash. It's long term reputation in the film studies world is "fake transgressive" pulp. It's not nearly as juicy and entertaining as Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS.

by Anonymousreply 4October 1, 2015 3:31 PM

I love the opening gambit of Ebert's 1975 review:

[quote]"The Night Porter" is as nasty as it is lubricious

Having said that, I first saw it in a Sydney arthouse cinema in the late '70s when I was still a teenager and loved it. I've since seen it a couple of times on the smaller TV screen, and, though I don't agree with Ebert's review, it's nowhere near as convincing or interesting as it seemed at the time. Cavani's attempt to explain away sadomasochism (the natural state of male–female relationships for her, I presume?) through the belaboured metaphorisation of political fascism is just trite. Although, I suppose, you could actually turn that on its head and just as easily say that Cavani is trying to explain away fascism as some sort of erotic necessity—in which case, Ebert is right when he says the film is just plain nasty.

by Anonymousreply 5October 1, 2015 3:40 PM

I know she's one of those UK National Treasures but I've never liked her. She seemed hardened and crazy; one of those people who dismisses their bad behaviour as "artistic license." I never thought she was much of an actress. She was willing to strip, which made her a part of more films that she normally would have been in based on talent alone.

by Anonymousreply 6October 1, 2015 3:47 PM

Speaking of, R3, I first saw Salo in a porno house on Market Street in SF. It was even programmed between gay porn! Perfect!

by Anonymousreply 7October 1, 2015 3:47 PM

Who thinks it's powerful and important? Pauline Kael laughed at how stupid it was. I suppose the Eurotrash types still think it's impressive.

by Anonymousreply 8October 1, 2015 4:07 PM

It's on Hulu. I will check it out. I love this stuff.

by Anonymousreply 9October 1, 2015 4:14 PM

[quote] I suppose the Eurotrash types still think it's impressive.

I guess so.

by Anonymousreply 10October 1, 2015 4:16 PM

Cavani's films in general are pretty stupid and overheated. She made a film of BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL that is unwatchable.

I do like Rampling, though. She did a lot of Eurotrash movies in the 70's, but she's turned into a very fine actress over the last few decades.

by Anonymousreply 11October 1, 2015 4:53 PM

Hang on, r11, I love her Beyond Good and Evil!

by Anonymousreply 12October 1, 2015 8:53 PM

Cavani is a conceited hack. Her movies are all laughable, they aged terribly, and they just scream "70s eurotrash", like a C-grade Visconti. She's a closeted butch lez, btw

by Anonymousreply 13October 1, 2015 9:06 PM

btw, watch "La pelle", her movie about postwar Naples liberated by american troops: it's even worse than Night Porter, if you can believe it

by Anonymousreply 14October 1, 2015 9:08 PM

[quote] it's even worse than Night Porter, if you can believe it

LOL

Shame the story was executed so badly. It's a waste. Could have been interesting.

by Anonymousreply 15October 1, 2015 9:34 PM

well, it's based on a famous italian novel, but that's quite shitty too

by Anonymousreply 16October 1, 2015 9:41 PM

Personally, I feel very strongly that the story of the holocaust was so extraordinary fictional stories about it, seem totally superfluous and in my mind never work.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17October 1, 2015 9:44 PM

[quote]"The Night Porter" is as nasty as it is lubricious

Means you don't need lube.

by Anonymousreply 18October 1, 2015 10:04 PM

R1 actually, a movie released a few years ago, called the Black Book, was very similar and inspired no protests

by Anonymousreply 19October 6, 2018 5:54 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!