Tasteful friends, we'll gather in the orangery and swim across to the summer bar for adios motherfuckers and angels' tits. Swimsuits are optional, of course!
It's just like adding a bridge between two buildings -- a very heavy bridge, but the anchoring buildings can take it.
I hope it is not in earthquake country, though.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | August 25, 2015 1:55 PM |
Is this a design concept, or a reality? Details please.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | August 25, 2015 1:58 PM |
It's a concept -- but doable -- most of the support would be on anchors atop each roof, not visible in the photo.
You'd also need a ribbed bottom, to minimize the vibration from sloshing,
by Anonymous | reply 3 | August 25, 2015 2:31 PM |
As pictured this would never be built because there is no way for people to get out at the sides which is necessary for safety.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | August 25, 2015 2:43 PM |
The access to the pool would be at the unseen anchor points.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | August 25, 2015 3:18 PM |
Still need to be able to get out at the sides. So inkers their are fairly wide side walkways with railing, this would never be built
by Anonymous | reply 6 | August 25, 2015 3:22 PM |
[quote] So inkers their are fairly wide side walkways with railing
What?
by Anonymous | reply 7 | August 25, 2015 3:31 PM |
Cannonball!
by Anonymous | reply 8 | August 25, 2015 6:12 PM |
Just because something CAN be built, doesn't mean it SHOULD be built
by Anonymous | reply 9 | August 25, 2015 6:13 PM |
It's a swimming pool, not a death machine, r9.
It would need braces beneath each lower edge to compensate for thermal deflections, but the bottom would still be mostly clear to view the down below.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | August 25, 2015 6:19 PM |
Sorry. I should have linked to an article as well. It's an apartment complex currently under construction in London, due to open in 2018.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | August 25, 2015 6:20 PM |
It looks ugly.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | August 26, 2015 1:07 AM |
See how the pool is anchored on the roof?
Also, since it is London, no need for earthquake or thermal braces.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | August 26, 2015 4:11 AM |
Isn't it usually too cold to swim outdoors in London?
by Anonymous | reply 15 | August 26, 2015 5:11 PM |
If they heated the water, the condensate would drip on the people walking below
by Anonymous | reply 16 | August 26, 2015 7:07 PM |
Why not more love for sky pool?
by Anonymous | reply 17 | August 27, 2015 12:35 PM |
I'm digging it. It would certainly be an experience every time one goes for a swim. Solar might be an option for heating the pool at certain times of the year. However, considering London's overall weather conditions, it doesn't seem very practical for this design concept.
I like it because it can be appreciated at ground level and in the pool, but limited functionally in London.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | August 27, 2015 12:53 PM |
That's just begging for a kid with a BB gun.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | August 27, 2015 1:09 PM |
^ bullet-proof fibre glass as materials, per chance?
by Anonymous | reply 20 | August 27, 2015 1:18 PM |
I would think it was pexiglass
by Anonymous | reply 21 | August 27, 2015 1:24 PM |
I haven't forgotten the sky pool
by Anonymous | reply 22 | February 22, 2016 5:56 AM |
The problem with sky bridges of any sort is sinkage or shitifting on one side or another.
We worked on such a project here in Honolulu where both towers are linked by a set of sky apartments.
I wouldn't buy into a project like that for love or money.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | February 22, 2016 6:00 AM |
Yes, it's pixie gas.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | February 22, 2016 6:02 AM |
What a craptastrophe waiting to happen. Jeebus.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | February 22, 2016 6:03 AM |
[quote]The problem with sky bridges of any sort is sinkage or shifting on one side or another.
A series of self adjusting pool support and leveling struts would fix that -- but the struts would probably cost more than the pool.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | February 22, 2016 1:49 PM |
Apart from the prohibitive cost of anchoring this monstrosity in the sky, the constant weight from deflections onto the main structures would create significant structural pressure which could eventually lead to failure of some part.
Leaving that aside, I personally - as much as I love London - would not want to step into a pool of stagnant water subject to the impact of a breadth of uncontrollable airborne industrial pollutants, and adverse weather conditions 24/7, 365 days a year.
But that's just me. Give me a safe, secure and properly maintained private pool any day.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | February 22, 2016 2:56 PM |
The struts would level and damp the deflections, r27, but at a very high cost.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | February 22, 2016 3:23 PM |
Nothing could possibly go wrong with that.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | February 22, 2016 3:29 PM |
The active damping/leveling struts might cost more than the building. They'd weigh a lot too.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | February 22, 2016 3:31 PM |
London, as in England? What's the point of such an outdoor pool attraction in a country where it's only sunny and hot, like, two weeks a year?
by Anonymous | reply 31 | February 22, 2016 3:36 PM |
Whoa! Too cool...definitely would love to try it out.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | February 22, 2016 4:01 PM |
Can you swim naked in it?
by Anonymous | reply 33 | February 22, 2016 4:19 PM |
This has GOT to be the worst idea any idiot ever dreamed up in his worst 'shroom hallucination. Yes, so they can find your naked, pulverized body on the ground after you are first cut to ribbons plummeting through the tank as it shatters. ("Waiter, what's this sliced and diced person doing in my soup?" "Looks like the back-stroke, ma'am.")
by Anonymous | reply 34 | February 25, 2016 3:21 AM |
[quote] It's a swimming pool, not a death machine
Oh, no. That IS a death machine.
As for me, no way no how.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | February 25, 2016 3:30 AM |
..let them wear caftans, R16
by Anonymous | reply 36 | February 25, 2016 3:31 AM |
Wow. You’d definitely have to enforce the no horseplay rule or it could get dangerous.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | January 31, 2021 1:15 AM |
Said it was for completion in 2018. Was it ever built?
by Anonymous | reply 39 | January 31, 2021 1:22 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 40 | January 31, 2021 1:31 AM |
R40 thanks hon ❤️
by Anonymous | reply 41 | January 31, 2021 1:32 AM |