Hillary When Asked if She Wiped Her Server

A real pro would use canned air.

OP probably thinks Donald Trump is the smartest person ever

One, she is nearly 70. No one that age is that savvy with technology.

[quote]This is the smartest woman in the world?

What?! Says who?

When I think of the smartest people in the world I don't think of ANY politicians. Try mathematicians, physicists, scientists.

When I read the thread & your comment - I had to think for a second myself...and I've been using computers since 1986. You wipe the memory... the "server" sounds physical...in my head... i'm not sure - but it took a second.

Is anyone at all enthused about the prospect of Hillary as President?

Voting for the Iraq War should disqualify her from any serious person's vote if nothing else.

I know. Hilarious. Like she even knows what a cloth is, let alone used it to wipe anything. That's what the little people are for.

An orange pantsuit? Good Lord.

"Voting for the Iraq War should disqualify her from any serious person's vote if nothing else."

Yeah, I guess the serious people all prefer war hawk Repugs.

I don't care who wins. Whoever feels like it should vote tomorrow and let's be done with it. They can rule forever if I never have to watch anymore media coverage on politics ever again. It doesn't matter who wins. They are just the figurehead.

She's a lying cunt.

R8, Sanders, Paul, Trump were all against it.

At least she has the orange pantsuit already. Now all she needs is the cankle chains and a commissary acount.

On what earth is she considered the smartest woman?

She needs to go back to the blue. This orange trend in general needs to go away. No one looks good in orange.

Except the great pumpkin.

She is smart, in an evil cunning way. Her answer was to deflect from the truth. Everything is collapsing around her. I kid of feel sorry for her. Someone even noted in another thread that she should be on suicide watch.

Put me on Hillary's team. When I read that sentence I thought OP was talking about whoever waited on her.

Libs think she is smart because she is a "strong woman". In fact, she is not all that smart. She is second behind Bill in everything, no matter how either one of them tries to play it.

She is so distasteful. Such a repulsive cunt. No not what she said but what she is wearing. She is a fashion disaster of the highest order. Where the fuck is Mr Blackwell when you really need him?

Yeah, r11, thinking people love Trump and take him seriously as a candidate. Btw, he didn't risk anything by saying he was against it since he wasn't an elected official at the time and still isn't

r18, your idea of a smart person is a kook like Rand Paul, so what the hell are you doing judging Clinton?

OP is too simple to realize Hillary was being sarcastic. I saw the interview, too. One reporter was asking repetitive versions of similar questions and was taking-up a lot of everyone's limited time to question HRC.

When people criticize Hillary for nonsense as if it's a big deal, it's evidence that there is little to truly criticize.

R18 source? Or is that just your opinion?

Was the question about how she treats the butler's ass?

Bretton Woods.

Play her off keyboard cat. It's time.

R20, are you saying Hillary's vote for the invasion of Iraq is excusable because to say no would have been risky?

Profiles in courage!

I am not old like most of you posting on this thread but why such disdain for Hillary and do you really think Sanders is the right dude? I don't hear it as much out in the real world or on other sites but why so much here...come on DL are all you old queens republicans or what gives?

[quote] Hillary When Asked if She Wiped Her Server

Shaka when the walls fell.

Having a war criminal as president isn't nice, R27.

[quote] Having a war criminal as president isn't nice

It served us well.

I think she's just great. She's been held to a different and higher standard than any other candidates, especially all men. She was wrong on her vote allowing GWB to go to war if he chose to (It was NOT a vote "to go to war"), and has discussed her vote since. At the time it was clearly the vote millions if not the majority of her constituents wanted here in NY after 9-11. Plus, it was a DOZEN years ago, and her voting record and actions since have been great as far as I'm concerned. I've met her at small events number of times and was more than impressed. She came prepared having done her homework. She also treated ALL of the help like VOTERS and not "the little people". I am happy with her policy positions.

Anyone who thinks Bernie can do even as well as Michael Dukakis did in 1988 is OUT OF THEIR MIND. The Bernie crowd seems determined to turn the country over to Scott Walker or Jeb Bush. I am not so suicidal.

If it is any of your business, I only wipe with Cottonelle.

Some "mistakes" you don't just get over. Yes it bloody well WAS a vote to go to war, R31. Everyone paying attention, everyone, knew this, we knew the claim Iraq was a threat to the US and had WMD was a lie. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. I was out in the streets protesting along with millions of others around the world.

Either Hillary is stupid, which she isn't, or she simply went along with Bush's lies out of expediency and the desire to look tough. How the hell can you be satisfied with "I was wrong".

Hillary voted to invade a country that had not attacked the US, on false premises. As a result, millions of Iraqi people are dead or displaced and ISIS threatens the Middle East. This shouldn't just disqualify her from office, it should land her in jail for war crimes. And that's the same standard I'd apply to every single one of them. Blaming her constituents because they were lied to is even worse.

Agree with Reply 33. I also, for some very strange reason remember an outburst she hac in front of reporters - this was when she was newly appointed Secretary of State. The question made some oblique reference to what Mr Clinton would have done wrt some policy stance. And there she was in all her glory in the Middle East on stage in front of international journalists having a rather unbecoming meltdown "who cares what Bill would have done, I'm the Secretary of State now." I thought she was emotionally unequipped for that job and as for POTUS job, if the best response she can summon is wiping her server, she has never ever struck me as having the emotional fortitude and authentic demenour to carry that level of responsibility. Hillary's time is up. Go play with the grandkid and leave Bill alone with his blonde babe. She just seems stuck and you can see the stress is just starting to show through.

Great r33 and r34. You are both helping Jeb(!) or Scott Walker be our next Bush President they way so many did in 2000. Talk about unforgivable!

R34, What a chauvinistic statement to make about the most qualified person, male or female, to ever run for the presidency. You just don't like women.

Nah, Trump's the man.

[quote] Nah, Trump's the manchild.

Fixed It For You!

I agree he and his supporters are ignorant overgrown manchildren.

Jeb is comatose. He's just missing his favourite pillow when on the road that's all.

R34 - A bit hard to be "chauvinistic" when the writer is a woman. Hillary thinks she's being funny, clever, but she's also copping some serious heat over "wiped confidential" electronic messages.

Trump may not be everybody's cup of tea, but his opinions are strong reality checks for any citizen concerned about the future.

Republicans and the GOP

President Hillary Rodham Clinton

Just practicing. She is going to be great. Despite the asshole snipers constantly nipping at her heels for being, well, for having the nerve to be Hillary Clinton.

[quote] Trump may not be everybody's cup of tea, but his opinions are strong reality checks for any citizen concerned about the future.

Yes deporting 11 million immigrants and building a wall for which Mexico will pay are realistic.

Trump appeals to bigots because he's a bigot. Plain and simple. Just like the homophobic bigots who voted for G. W. Bush. Bush spoke out against gay marriage and that was all a certain segment of the population needed to hear. Twice they voted their prejudiced and cast their ballots for GW. They too were concerned citizens. Unfortunately, they weren't concerned enough about their own futures. Instead they were concerned about punishing gays and limiting future prospects for gays. Trumps bigot supporters have the same mindset. We know all know how things panned out with G.W. . The bigots couldn't stop progress and by twice electing Bush, they harmed themselves with their attempts. Left to their own devices Trump supporters would do the same thing. I just wish the Trump supporters would stop trying to spin, dress up and disguise their reason for supporting him. It's so tired.

She is a dumb-ass liar and would tank America! America deserves better than her!!!!!

What R9 said.

You guys are hilarious and seriously deluded.

She's a smug cunt

R35 perfectly sums up the 'lesser of two evils' mentality that means there isn't a cigarette paper's width between D and R.

She was being facetious. Besides its a technical question that she may not actually know the answer to.

[quote]there isn't a cigarette paper's width between D and R. Except for on the issues of progressive taxation, immigration, reproductive rights for women, gay rights, healthcare for all Americans, a safety net for low income Americans and foreign policy, you're exactly right!

Both parties support mass illegal immigration, lowering taxes, both of them hate universal healthcare, both of them attack welfare, and both of them love Israel. Both of them are in the pockets of the banks and hedge funds. Hillary will bomb Iran the first chance she gets.

So what's the difference? Maybe gay rights?

"smartest woman in the world"

Ahem.

R42, thank you. I agree everything you said (and you said it perfectly). Donald Trump should only be President in a world in which Kim Kardashian is Secretary of State and NeNe Leakes is Speaker of the House. People have truly lost their fucking minds.

[quote]Both parties support mass illegal immigration, lowering taxes, both of them hate universal healthcare, both of them attack welfare, and both of them love Israel. Both of them are in the pockets of the banks and hedge funds.

Pure bullshit. You clearly don't know a damn thing about American politics.

One party supports healthcare for all, women's reproductive rights, raising the taxes of the 1%, finding peaceful and diplomatic solutions to the middle east problem, gay marriage and easing the burdens of the middle class. The other one actively works against every single one of these positions.

Merkel can't speak English! Smart? Ha!

She wasn't being serious. However she's really annoying me with her comments on this issue. These are the comments I want her to have ready.

I did the same thing Colin Powell did but you never heard the Republicans worry about it, did you?

The FBI, an independent, non-partisan organization, is handling this and I will be completely cleared of any wrongdoing. (She could have deflected this question with this comment)

I employed this mom-and-pop operation to run my server because I wanted to help small business.

[quote] I am not old like most of you posting on this thread but why such disdain for Hillary and do you really think Sanders is the right dude? I don't hear it as much out in the real world or on other sites but why so much here...come on DL are all you old queens republicans or what gives?

R27, there are some Rethuglicans posting in this thread, they are terrified of Hillary because she can (and will) beat anyone they nominate. She also won't take any of their shit or try to be "nice" to them, the way President Obama was for (imo) too long. They know President Clinton always beat them at their own game and Hillary will do the same.

We also have one, maybe two, wannabe "socialists" who post here. Once Occupy Wall St. got shut down they were at a bit of a loss as to what to do. Instead of something useful, this moron spends his time here, ranting and raving at gay people. Like most of our truly batshit posters, he's probably been kicked off of other, more politically specific, websites.

I am looking forward to voting for Hillary Clinton for president - again. This time she'll win.

WOW! TONS OF FFC's ON THIS THREAD!

What's an "FFC" and why are you cyber-shouting?

Her five minute back and forth verbal tangle with FOX'S Ed Henry was the best.

F***t Freeper Cunts Maybe? Just a guess.

When sarcasm eludes someone, that someone is on the path to dementia or Alzheimers. Hilary's comment was hilarious...too bad she couldn't have said "What? How? You mean 'front to back'?"

Hillary has known for a long time that she was going to run for POTUS. She seems like she doesn't know how to answer any of the questions put to her. She's had plenty of time to craft a logical response to everything that is thrown at her. And yet she stumbles with every response.

Chris Hayes said on his show the other night that, as a member of the media, he can just feel those in his own industry rooting for her to fail. Though hardly a surprise, I still thought it a startlingly honest thing to say.

R62, exactly.

R63 What a childish thing for him to say. she's made poor choices and she's being held accountable for him. Is he a sobbing fanboi?

R62 The lie gets bigger and then the liar starts losing track of where their lie began and what they've said to cover it up.

R65 [them]

FFC = FREEPER FUNDIE CUNTS

Thank you, R68, it's a very appropriate term.

Now please turn off the all-caps key on your keyboard, it's rude and unpleasant.

HAHA, R69.

I love you.

R69 Asking a childish, FF happy narcissist to turn off his caps is like whistling in the wind.

She's so incredibly careful not to say anything the teeny-tiniest bit potentially, maybe, possibly controversial or capable of being misconstrued as even hinting at a position (ask Teri Gross), and yet she's comedy good for not giving a fuck about what the cameras catch.

If I were running against her, I'd keep an ever-changing stack of cue-card like blow-ups of photos of her looking buffoonish, haughty, like a rabid jackal, like a Macy's Parade balloon about to burst... and just say "Oh, Hillary." as I flipped through the photos at random.

*comedy gold

It's like she's Damian from The Omen. The right wing media (which BTW is practically ALL of it) is sitting with their daggers ready to stab Hillary! Nothing has changed in almost 25 years. Nothing.

The Republicans have nothing and nobody, so of course they're going after her to keep people at home. That's the way they win. Funny how John Ellis practically did the same thing as governor including purging voter rolls and the right and the so called liberal media have nothing to say...

R74 Poor, little Hillary! The opposition is...opposing her! Reporters are reluctantly asking questions! It's all so unfair!

R75 The 'opposition' (I call them what they are idiots but I digress) isn't asking her about anything relevant to her being in the White House. They certainly aren't asking the same questions to everyone else WHO DID THE SAME THING! Again see Jeb! for more details.

Notice they always ask if HRC is trustworthy, while giving EVERYONE ELSE a pass. And they're just as bad if not worse!

Flinging bullshit and opposition are two totally different things. But by all means, we have to kill her or else! Let the right take the election and Watergate, the Iraq war and the economic collapse of 2008 will seem quaint!

[quote] President Hillary Rodham Clinton Just practicing. She is going to be great. Despite the asshole snipers constantly nipping at her heels for being, well, for having the nerve to be Hillary Clinton.

OMG I agree that she will be great! It's all the elder miserable queens on DL that HATE her most will die before she is elected or in office so who cares what they think! LOL

R76 She is a Presidential candidate. Of course she's being asked questions about her past choices in leadership roles. Of course Republicans are getting it, too, as they well should. Jeb isn't being asked the sorts of questions Trump is because Trump is polling higher. No on is asking Sanders the hard questions.

Clinton bouncing between victim posing and displaying smug arrogance is not going to help her at election time.

Mr. Trump, if you are elected President will you place your billions of dollars in a blind trust?

Answer: How blind?

The misogyny on this board is out of control as to Hillary.

The only cunts are the cunts who call her a cunt.

R79 Holding her to the same standards as men is "misogynistic"? Who's being patronizing, now?

"I CAN SHOVE A WHOLE MIDGET UP MY ASSHOLE"

I can't believe you guys actually believe her.

R82 Old dreams die hard.

Her staff brainstormed that canned response in advance. It's actually pretty good.

Get real guys, gals. Hil's not my first choice for the Democratic nomination. That would be Liz W. But she'll make a helluva lot better president that any of the Neanderthal clowns running for the Repug nomination. Not one of them is presidential in any way.

R85 That's the kind of arrogance that's turning The American People off to Democrats.

I detect the putrid stench of DUHvida Witchiepooshoes all over this fucking thread. She posts multiple anti-Hillary threads every day and constantly comments in them.

That grease fire's ready 24/7, cunt.

[quote] [R85] That's the kind of arrogance that's turning The American People off to Democrats.

1) That's the kind of fucked up capitalization that turns everyone off - period.

2) The Democratic Party is doing just fine, thank you. It's the Republican Tea Party that Americans are turning away from in droves. Good luck with your fabulous, amazing, biggest, best, most luxurious, exclusive nominee, Donald Trump.

—Anonymous

reply 86

Only deluded libratards would vote for this lying,arrogant lesbo called hillary. You fraus need a freaking reality check!

R80, no she isn't. When the GW Bush ADMINISTRATION ran 30 FUCKING MILLION, that is MILLION!, emails through RNC servers, nobody gave a mouse fart.

She is NOT being held to the same standards as men. She is being held to Mother Teresa standards.

This is not fair. Less than a hundred thousand, let it go.

R62: you are the wisest person on this thread. Your astute observation should concern anyone who cares regardless of political affiliation.

Why aren't they demanding that Colin Powell turn over his computers so they can retrieve his emails while he was SOS? He admitted that he deleted ALL of them.

R87 You need help.

Colin Powell isn't running for president

R90 She is being held to her own standards. The very ones she fought for and reminded her own staff to obey.

[quote] Only deluded libratards would vote for this lying,arrogant lesbo called hillary. You fraus need a freaking reality check!

Why is it only on DL is the word libertards and fraus used????? I don't get it?

R87 I agree 100%!

What's that cunt's address? I'll start one myself!

R89, Libertards are not the same as Liberals.

oh wow clinton has her own DL tag - this is going to be serious

R74, you think the media is right wing? I'm starting a cult and you will be my first subject.

The media is VERY right wing, always has been. The big Fixed News Rethuglican whine fest over the left wing media was nothing but bullshit.

R101 Obama, himself, when discussing his personal view that importing people to thin-out the natives, changes Americainto a more Progressive (Left leaning). He said there are now 600 media channels, versus the big 3 or 4 there once was and one Conservative one "that all the conservatives watch". He made the statement himself.

She pisses me off because she often appears to abandon Democrat principles in order to get things done. And she does so at the expense of her authenticity. Which is why many people don't trust her. It may be the way things work in Washington but some people manage to get along without losing their souls. Joe Biden works that system to the benefit of the American people but he does have a line that he will not cross. Obama has refused to play that game and we all know how that's worked out for him. Still, he held his ground, has had some spectaculaor wins, and will probably go down in history as not only the first AA president, but one of the greats. Hillary dug herself this hole by trusting younger, more tech savvy aides, who probably told her that it was perfectly fine to use her HOME IP server to conduct official gov'ment bizness. She's to blame because she handed her enemies the means to fuck her, and I don't mean just the Republicans, who never give up trying to put a Clinton in jail. No. I'm talking about the rumors that Valerie Jarrett leaked the e-mail story. Which means Obama is not feeling Hillary. At all. And is going to wait to see if she's the last one standing to endorse her. I hate bullies. Of any kind. I have to admit that she is starting to win my sympathy. She needs to push back and hard. Stop hiding behind campaign aides and the secret service. The more she tries to pretend that this isn't a major problem the more people think she has something to hide. Start swinging and don't worry so much about where those punches land. That's the first step.

Good thing the Bitch likes to wear orange.

R102, are you under the impression that I am President Obama or that I share every view he has down to the last detail?

There is more to right-wing media that Fixed News. The Nation is left-wing, Mother Jones, some websites, some of the shows on MSNBC (some not). The rest of the media is decidedly right-wing with some of it (like Fixed News) being extremist right wing. They count on corporate advertising for their money, what else would they be? It's not shocking in the slightest.

I'm not sure that you have a reasonable perception of what "right wing" and "left wing" actually mean. (Hint: Presenting facts that show the right-wing as the lying sacks of shit they are is not left-wing, it's simply accurate journalism. Sack up or get the fuck out of politics and media, ladies.)

*THAN Fixed News

She was joking, but this is a very important point not yet discussed. Hillary is not tech savvy, hell most of congress still uses paper instead of email. She personally did not wipe the server clean. She did not set it up; I'm sure she had no idea now secure it was or wasn't.

I want to know who the IT person was. I want to know why the State Department did not inform her that the rules had changed.

[quote][R85] That's the kind of arrogance that's turning The American People off to Democrats.

How dare they support their own candidates! You'd never see a Republican do such a thing.

I don't care who the IT person was, I don't care what was on the fucking server. It's already been established that there was nothing terribly compromising, it's a non-issue.

This is the Benghazi non-issue all over again. Sorry, Rethugs, we didn't care about that, we don't care about this and we won't care about the next thing either. You think you can pick off enough Independents to make up for the fact that Hispanics hate you. It won't work. You're toast in 2016 so wrap your lips around saying President Hillary Rodham Clinton for at least four years.

Good times.

If only someone had asked Bill that question after Monica visited.

Who's Monica?

R105 No. I'm just stating that there is no basis in reality for your claim that mass media overwhelmingly favors Conservatives, Republicans and Right Wingers. It has nothing to do with your personal opinion. You are simply wrong.

No, actually R112, you are completely wrong but that's all right. We already knew you were either ignorant or lying. You remind me of DUMBvida and her endlessly stupid right-wing talking points pronouncements.

[quote]You think you can pick off enough Independents to make up for the fact that Hispanics hate you. It won't work.

NAILED IT.

R113 Have you been paying any attention, at all? The Progressive Cynic starts of with assumptions about what critics of Progressive media are actually saying: He controls the conversation from the very beginning. It's not just who's financing these outlets but what they are actually promoting and how much airtime is given to what; particularly, relative to importance (as weighed by power balance, sort of like the 40 mins. CBS gave to the affair between two Conservative House members this past week, vs. the 15 mins. given to investigating why the FBI has decided 300 of Hillary's emails contained classified information ).

He gives no links, no resources, nothing supporting that Soros financing certain outlets is somehow not factual (because he is financing these outlets). He calls out 5 different Conservative leaning news sources as proof of some "bubble"; this would actually confirm the overwhelming imbalance that those patrons believe exists. The "alphabet" networks nearly all own the cable news networks, respectively, so it's not extreme to think the management managing one network and the investors investing in a parent company, might have influence on what content is culled and the stories curated.

The rest is just opinion. Just speculative opinion.

This is the funniest thing I've seen in a while.

She was clearly joking, and OP is an idiot.

Keep fucking that chicken, R115.

r94, and neither Hillary or Colin are the war criminals that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are. Two ran their emails through the DNC, the other, presumably, through the Pentagon.

R119: what does any of that have to do with the current campaign? If it makes you feel better, bush, Powell, and Rumsfeld can be assigned to the same chain gang, and then Hillary needs to be fully vetted on this issue. Pointing to other's bad behavior from the past shouldn't absolve current candidates from answering important questions about their record and their character.

[quote]She pisses me off because she often appears to abandon Democrat principles in order to get things done.

And with the use of the "Democrat" instead of the grammatically correct "Democratic" you reveal yourself as a wingnut operative.

Bye Felicia!

"I don't have to wipe the hand of my servers. They are required to change their gloves twice a day."

No, r121. I believe that is the correct term. I am a Democrat. Not a Democratic. Grow the fuck up you myopic moron. Do you have anything meaningful to add to the discussion or are you just the designated thread asshole?

WHY r120? Because YOU and her other enemies say so? Meanwhile in the real world outside of you and your right wing friends (and DON'T even bother telling me you're a Dem or Independent because YOU would be lying), NO ONE REPEAT NO ONE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT THAT SERVER!!!

Your hero is actually trying to break the law by trying to throw millions of AMERICAN children out of their own country! But this is YOUR priority!

GET BENT!

I have a vat of Crisco and it's NOT for fisting! I'm looking for matches now.

[quote]I believe that is the correct term. I am a Democrat. Not a Democratic.

Aha! Now it makes sense.

You're an illiterate moron who was never taught the difference between a noun and an adjective.

Meanwhile Hillary continues to poll 20 points above any of the clowns in the GOP.

Carry on.

The "Democrat" versus "Democratic" thing really needs to go. Sure, some of them are rightwing concern trolls who forget to use the correct term, but in this day and age with autocorrect issues and general lack of caring about grammar on informal websites, it seems really bizarre to use that one single criterion as justification to derail a whole thread.

Especially nowadays when you can just ignore someone. BLOOP. Ignored. Add them to all the Freeper fucks you ignored and go on with your day.

[quote]Pointing to other's bad behavior from the past shouldn't absolve current candidates from answering important questions about their record and their character.

No, but it does re-establish the point - that so many seem to have willfully forgotten - that she wasn't violating protocol as she understood it at the time, nor was she violating any stated rules.

R123, Democrat is a noun. Democratic is an adjective. Now think as if you were back in fifth grade.

Who entitled people who entered the country illegally and have further broken laws on employment, entitlements, taxation, and declared them immune from deportation? People whom have lived by the rules are suppose to embrace those that don't? The 14th amendment was intended to address another situation, not the proliferation of anchor babies and their kin. Fine the hell out of employers of illegals, and shame on the Roman Catholic Church, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, CEO busselguts, pig bankers, and politicians that have allowed and promoted this horrible mess in moving the USA towards the third world. You tell 'em Donald!

I hate presidential elections because there so much time wasted on "scandals" like this one.

The Presidency is about policies. The discussion should be solely about which policies you support and which you don't.

Everything else is a distraction.

R129 Sure the 14th Amendment was used for one situation but the writers specifically did not list that one situation--so it's meant for all situations. Read the words.

If it were only to recognize only blacks as citizens, it would have said so.

Which amendment recognizes Hillary as a cunt?

R132 The same one that recognizes you as an ass

GREAT ANSWER! 👍👍

Hillary is a criminal! Not only guilty for the email negligence but also responsible for the deaths of the 4 Americans in the Benghazi attack. She should be in jail and not running around as a presidential candidate. What an alibi to evade prosecution?

I really hate the new DL format but I love the hell out of that ignore feature.

Buh-bye Freeper scum!

It's absolutely laughable that this would be considered a "scandal." Nothing illegal or inappropriate occurred. The only reason it's being called that is because the right wing propaganda machine has infected what used to be "objective" media sources like the broadcast networks, CNN, MSNBC who've completely abandoned fact checking in favor of sensationalism. We have a corporate media. Scandals, however fake, drive ratings, which drive corporate profits. Period. Donald Trump gets big ratings so they obsess on him too. They don't want to talk about the candidate's policies. It doesn't make them money.

"Wiped? Who found out about that?! All I'll say is that he knew he shouldn't have been clearing dishes while our special 'donor discussion' was going on. The server was warned. That is all."

R124: you are ridiculous. I don't think you are capable of holding an original or independent thought. The fact you are incapable of either facing anyone who doesn't think exactly like you or accepting that you don't have to be a 'right wing nut' to think Hillary Clinton is not the be all end all candidate disqualifies you as someone to be taken seriously.

On its merits, the email server issue shouldn't be that big a deal. It's too bad you can't see how ineffective Hillary has been in dealing with the issue. Her answers are smug and slippery. If she had the ability to be straightforward and honest, the whole thing would have probably been left in the dust by now.

A truly effective leader would have realized that and made the whole thing go away.

I hope you grow up one day and realize that anyone who wants to be president should be put to the test over everything. It's what is best for everyone involved (including the candidate).

[quote]responsible for the deaths of the 4 Americans in the Benghazi attack

Explain in detail how she is responsible for these deaths and why she should be jailed for it.

[quote]A truly effective leader would have realized that and made the whole thing go away.

A truly effective leader would answer all questions and cooperate with any investigations while biding her time for the answers to come, secure in the knowledge that she didn't do anything illegal or actionable.

And that's exactly what she did.

I think you are conflating an effective politician with an effective leader.

The fact that they can't find any of her Benghazi emails is a suspect. She wiped out evidence regarding Benghazi, that she abandoned those 4 poor Americans.

[quote] Clinton bouncing between victim posing and displaying smug arrogance is not going to help her at election time.

The fact that you choose to characterize - mischaracterize - Clinton's responses to more false allegations this way says it all about you.

After nearly 25 years of outrageously false allegations about her, Clinton has every right to react as she chooses. As it is, the future President has been gracious and forthright and responding with the respect and gravitas it deserves - which is actually none.

Exactly so, R144, the anti-Hillary clowns are so tiresome. She is, without question, the most qualified candidate running for president. She has my vote. The End.

[quote] I think you are conflating an effective politician with an effective leader.

Unless she is an effective politician she will not be an effective leader, R142. Happily, our next president is both.

I don't get you Hillary supporters, r144 and r145 . Why are you so voraciously against The Public pointing out what they see as her weaknesses, what messages she might not be getting across to the general public?

Do you really think a handful of Hillary skeptics on DL are the only ones asking these questions? There are some very, intelligent people on this site and many are saying "This looks bad for her". If you really support her, why wouldn't you want to learn from this? I would be surprised if you're in politics, advertising or PR. This is freebie information for her campaigners and you are demanding dissenting voices be silenced. I don't get it.

I just don't see the effective leadership:

She failed to bring about healthcare in bill's first term

She, as a feminist icon, slut shamed the women bill used and abused as a way to protect him

As senator she voted to authorize the war in Iraq

As 2008 candidate, she fanned racial tension when she got desperate to beat Obama

As Secretary of State, she really didn't do anything of note and her big initiative to handle Putin and Russia was a failure.

Those are big time moments when her leadership was absent or a failure that are consistently dispersed over nearly 25 years

We are fucked! Joe Biden, please save us!

She doesn't listen and she never admits when she's wrong. She makes poor hiring choices, and her management style is disengaged. Not a good candidate by any means.

When she and Bill were in the White House they really were the poorest people to occupy it since the 19th century. Why they gave that up for questionable associations is puzzling to me.

Gave up the White House r150? What do you mean? They stayed in the White House for 8 fucking long years and that's the maximum for 2 terms.

[quote]I don't get you Hillary supporters, [R144] and [R145] . Why are you so voraciously against The Public pointing out what they see as her weaknesses, what messages she might not be getting across to the general public?

The real question here is how much the RNC is paying you to shill on the internet.

We have what - another 14 months of this shit?

Gave up their pose of public service for greedy speaking fees and pandering to donors.

[quote] This is freebie information for her campaigners and you are demanding dissenting voices be silenced.

No one is doing any such thing, you precious little concern troll.

Hil is a doddering old fool. She doesn't remember the last time she wiped her ass let alone wiped her server.

R155 and R152 Suit yourself. Stick your heads in the ground, Democrats and hope for the best. I'm an Independent and I do my research. This isn't a religion. It's not like I have some spiritual obligation to worship Hillary Clinton or back ideological dogma. If you want to be pig headed, so be it.

Thank you, r157. You may go now.

Biden will come in to save the day. Hil is such a naked opportunist. I can't wait to see him laugh at Hil when they debate. Unfortunately he might laugh at Bernie too.

[quote]Clinton bouncing between victim posing and displaying smug arrogance is not going to help her at election time.

Oh, I don't know. That's exactly what's helping Donald Trump in the race. In fact, his entire campaign is nothing but complaining and arrogance.

The GOP's got nothing on Hillary, which is why they keep harping on nonexistent issues like Benghazi and emails.

What's hilarious is America just doesn't care about the GOP attacks anymore.

R161 She is being actively investigated.

R161 What GOP candidate ISN'T actively being investigated? Heck, Bush and Jindal have to deal with their own email issues, but no one's talking about that

[quote]She is being actively investigated.

By a party that is DESPERATE to find anything to hang on her but so far keeps coming up with bupkis.

My, but the GOP shills are out in force today.

It's ALL about what policies Hillary will support vs. what ANY republican candidate will support, not these made up scandals.

Even GWB came into office as a "compassionate conservative" and he left office with the rich becoming wildly richer and the middle class torn apart. The GOP is NEVER for the middle class no matter what BS they speak.

It's because she's not suffering from their attacks like they'd hoped, r165.

R161 The GOP has had decades to actively investigate Hillary. The fact that they only have Benghazi and emails shows they have nothing.

Even the conservative Ken Starr, the special prosecutor who spent millions of tax dollars investigating the Clintons, said he came up with NOTHING.

GOP shills--please stop pretending any progressive is hoping for Biden to run.

[quote]A truly effective leader would have realized that and made the whole thing go away.

Sigh... That's the "Green Lantern" theory of politics, that all you have to do is "will" away the problem. We see this shit in discussions about foreign policy, too. It's total bullshit and it doesn't work out here in the real world. Nobody can "make the whole thing go away" so long as have a VRWC noise machine working overtime to keep it alive. Look at Benghazi, for example. Investigation after investigation, all of which have been negative, all of which have cleared her, and yet Congressional Republicans and candidates just will not let it die.

[quote]She is being actively investigated.

Not really. The New York Times completely botched the original story. All that was being investigated was whether the State Department followed appropriate policies for classifying documents and email. That had little to do with Clinton; she simply got caught in the crossfire. All that's happening now is that the FBI is currently looking at her server to verify whether it was configured properly to meet government standards. There's really nothing there, no matter how much screaming is going on.

Even Rubio at the start of the GOP debate said that Hillary had the most compelling resume of all of them

Hillary is as responsible for the deaths of the four in Benghazi as GWB is responsible for the 99 US embassy deaths during his 8 years.

The FBI has to cover up Killary the Terrorist's email scandal because she wasn't the only one in the terrorist government that supports ISIS/ISIL, which is what Benghazi was all about. It leads to the top of the presidency, and to both parties.

See, idiots/morons/sheep, our great terrorist government created, funded and supplied the 'terrorist' Al Kayda and ISISrael, with Britain and Terrorist Bagel Israel.

But you cum drinkers don't care. You would rather vote for Channing Tatum's butthole. Reality is heartbreakingly painful sometimes. It is best, though, to confront the facts that she, like many in our terrorist government, is a traitor and a liar and a war criminal.

Maybe the stupid cunt can explain how she 'killled' bin Laden, who was already dead for over 10 years. Idiots.

4 GOP-led congressional committees COMPLETELY vindicated Hillary on Benghazi but the GOP ignore those findings and doesn't mention them at all.

[quote]Hillary is as responsible for the deaths of the four in Benghazi as GWB is responsible for the 99 US embassy deaths during his 8 years.

Which is to say not at all. Next shill?

R173 it's been 5 days. Lay off the meth pipe

YAY! The complete lunatics have arrived!

R164 The Obama Administration?

The powers that run the GOP have to be aware that they have a collection of brain-damaged assclowns for candidates.

And so we're all being subjected to the Hillary Clinton Scandal Channel 24/7 for the next fifteen fucking months.

I can't think of a better way to burn through hundreds of millions of dollars, can you?

Since when is the Obama administration investigating Hillary Clinton?

The FBI answers to the justice department which is currently run by the Obama administration

According to the logic used and rules set up by R179 & R180, Obama and Lynch are GOP shills

[quote]The FBI answers to the justice department which is currently run by the Obama administration.

And none of them are investigating Hillary Clinton.

R183 Are you implying her server is a sentient being?

Liar, Liar, Pants suit on fire.

r128, Democrat is a proper noun and is capitalized. Democratic is an adjective and is capitalized when used as the Democratic Party (a proper noun). More often than not people capitalize democratic when it shouldn't. The democratic process is one thing, the Democratic Party is another while being a Democrat yet another.

When you call Hillary a cunt should cunt be capitalized?

The real question r173 l mean Cunty McCunterson is why you and your cohorts are infesting this site with your filthy lies. Drudge and the Daily Caller down today? No railroad tracks to play on? Your boyfriend Trump already boring you to death? Sore loser.

All you have to do is Google:

Is the FBI investigating Hillary Clinton?

There are articles from the last 2 days sourced to Al Jazeera America, NPR, and the Washington Post discussing the fact that more Clinton emails have been flagged for further evidence of security breeches and that the current investigation of Clinton is about to expand into a criminal one. Up to 12 extra investigators have been tapped to handle the widening investigation.

Well at least she didn't destroy her entire cell phone. That would have been a really, really stupid move !

But Tom she's deflated more balls than you could shake a stick at.

democrat.

democrat, democrat, democrat, democrat, democrat !

R107, you need to remain mute on issues of which you are ignorant. Anybody exposed to classified information is given a course on how to determine what should have a classification and how it should be transmitted and stored. The Secretary of State would have that education. She decided it didn't apply to her. The state department never issued her any type of smart device, but she was pictured with one many times, which means it was not secured. If any standard person with her level of clearance had pulled this shit they would be in jail.

This is so funny. These morons actually believe that they can do to Hillary Rodham Clinton what they did to Al Gore and John Kerry. Just tell a lot of lies and throw a bunch of wild accusations out there and hope something sticks.

This is Hillary Clinton, morons, she will have your balls for breakfast and we get to watch.

R194 No one's doing anything to her. She'd done it to herself.

To the anti-HIl crowd: Hil is a lying phony cunt. Even if they had video of her screwing Huma AND molesting a young boy or girl she would wiggle her way out of it. As fucked up as her reign as Secretary of State was nobody in the Democratic sphere really gives a fuck.

On the other hand, if Biden comes in Hil will have a problem. Democrats would have a real choice there. It's sad that Sanders is not taken seriously but he is not cunted, is from Brooklyn and looks older/disheveled. It's a shame politics are so superficial in this country because a former Republican like Liz Warren gets all the glory whereas the unsexy life long progessive independent, Sanders, is far from a media darling. Though I love the passion from the Bernie supporters.

Do you seriously imagine that Joe Biden, as likable as he is, actually poses a problem for Hillary Clinton? He doesn't and I say that as someone who has always liked him.

Just wrap your minds around President Hillary Clinton and call it a day, 'tards.

Biden does pose a problem for Hillary. If he takes 10 to 15 percent of her votes, which will be easy, Bernie wins.

[quote]that the current investigation of Clinton is about to expand into a criminal one.

I rather doubt that.

You are correct, r197. Hillary is her own worst threat

[quote]As fucked up as her reign as Secretary of State was

How so?

If not for the fact that she were running for President, no one would give a flying fuck. No one would even notice.

R202 It's okay for her to break the law if no one's looking? Now, with increased scrutiny, people are looking and that's a problem?

[quote] It's okay for her to break the law if no one's looking?

She hasn't broken any laws, liar.

Joe Biden is an idiot. He was an idiot back in the 1980s when I had to watch him make a fool of himself in Committee hearings and he remains one. Luckily for him he had a fabulous staff who did great work. So kudos to Joe for hiring a good staff.

"Increased Scrutiny" only means that someone will go to any lenghts, and any means to discredit their opponent.

She's broken a million laws! She is a criminal and should be hog-tided!!!

R204, you should not weigh in on topics you don't understand, I have clearance, not as high as hrc's but I know what is classified and how to handle it. I would be in jail if I funneled potentially classified information to a non secure steam.

Of course laws don't apply to HRC.

Hillary's press secretary, Brian Fallon, destroys rightwing talking points concerning Hillary's emails in a newly released video.

[quote]you should not weigh in on topics you don't understand

Oh, the irony, given your posts thus far.

Oops! Trey Gowdy and his fellow Republicans on the Benghazi committee are now in the same boat:

“Just as an aside, for the I.G. to now declare the material as classified, since it was provided by State to the House Benghazi committee earlier this year in unredacted form, presumably that means that members of the House Benghazi committee may have unwittingly handled classified material on unclassified systems within the House of Representatives,” Mr. Fallon said. “Now, I don’t think that anybody here at the Clinton campaign is going to say that members of, say, Chairman Gowdy’s staff should have their computers confiscated for having possibly trafficked in classified material,” he said. “I don’t think we would say that. But that is, fundamentally, the same logic behind the I.G.’s referral to the State Department with respect to Mrs. Clinton’s server, since she was at worst a passive recipient of unwitting information that subsequently became deemed as classified. Let’s raise that as an aside.”

[quote]you should not weigh in on topics you don't understand, I have clearance, not as high as hrc's but I know what is classified and how to handle it. I would be in jail if I funneled potentially classified information to a non secure steam.

And yet no one has brought any charges against her, there is no criminal investigation, and virtually every expert who has weighed in on the topic has made it clear that she broke no laws. So yeah, I'ma go with "liar."

I think we all understand quite clearly what's going on here. Don't presume to know our level of knowledge and capabilities R208.

But your first mistake was in assuming that you're smarter than the rest of us.

The laws of gravity certainly apply.

R206 So? Did she do it or did she not? That's what I care about.

As far as I can tell, there are no signs that Clinton broke the law or even broke the rules, no sign that she sent or received anything explicitly labelled "classified." All that's being asserted is that she may have received and/or forwarded items that were later classified or that "should" have been classified, where someone in the intelligence community thinks that a particular exchange really ought to have been classified.

As Jeffrey Toobin notes, though, the intelligence community *always* wants to mark things classified. As he writes:

[quote]In one case, according to media reports, one of Clinton’s potentially classified e-mail exchanges is nothing more than a discussion of a newspaper story about drones. That such a discussion could be classified underlines the absurdity of the current system. But that is the system that exists, and if and when the agencies determine that she sent or received classified information through her private server, Clinton will be accused of mishandling national-security secrets.

In short, this is much ado about nothing, so far, precisely as Clinton's supporters have asserted from the very beginning. The only real issue, from the very beginning, is who is deciding what should and should not be classified and are they doing so appropriately?

OOPSIES! I misread the headline.

I thought it said Hillary when asked if she wiped her own ass.

R217 That's what the server's for, silly.

Poor Hillary. She had to interrupt her 50K a week, just like you and me, vacation to go campaign. While Joe Biden is meeting with Elizabeth Warren.

To my dearest r219:

WHAT FUCKING DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!!!

Well Ms Mez when it's all said and done not a lot. I bet within 30 days she hits her head on the toilet again and is out of the campaign.

You mean like when Dubya choked on a pretzel and hit his head? Something like that? Allegedly.

But he already won didn't he?

Biden is not going anywhere. He is done, finished, finito.

Biden probably doesn't even remember to zip his fly when he's done taking a leak.

Hillary probably leaks into depends.

So will she r223. So will she.

Do you hear that sound? It's the GOP circling the drain! That idiot boyfriend of yours is proposing a constitutional crisis and you're putting HRC on blast.

Your meds have expired. Contact your pharmacist immediately!

[quote] Biden does pose a problem for Hillary. If he takes 10 to 15 percent of her votes, which will be easy, Bernie wins.

"Bernie" will never win the White House. VP is as high as Joe Biden will ever go.

Hillary Rodham Clinton is our next president. If you don't like it, I hear the Libertarian paradise of Somalia loves Teatards. Bon voyage.

I always wipe my server, then I leave a big tip.

LOL she still leads that bunch of clowns...it will all pass....

Not for long, r230. Not for long.

Yes for long, DUMBvida Witchiepooshoes @ R231, Hillary Clinton will beat them all including that bloviating pig-fucker with the hooker wife he wants to make first lady of this country.

Don't worry. R231 will DIE in a mysterious grease fire! Guaranteed!

It took 233 replies before Vince Foster checked in.

R234 Here's some gossip for you being that you're special needs and all...Mr. Foster IS deceased! That is all.

Hillary is trapped. She cannot go on the offensive against Republicans and other opponents in the media because the Justice Dept. (FBI) is examining the server she used, and the question about how alleged classified information was handled or maintained. Anything she would further say on the matter could be used against her if it later proves untrue. This controversy will drag on for months and chip away at her support. It will be the prime topic surrounding Hillary rather than focusing on campaign issues and distinguishing herself on the issues from GOP and primary opponents. I do feel bad for her due to the dilemma, but she made a stupid mistake in how she set-up her Email format and related structures, which displays poor judgment in this regard. Her secrecy, desire for control, and convenience preferences, have brought her pain. She had to know her opposition would hold her to standards, reasonable or not, beyond what is normally expected of others.

Nobody cares. It's just a red herring.

Now there is possibly a second server with hillary e-mails on it. When is enough, enough?

I can't wait to see this cow get beat out in the primaries.

The hand wringing over Hillary is absolutely exhausting.

R208, your problem is you don't understand the law.

[quote] VP is as high as Joe Biden will ever go

That's higher than he ever should have gone. He's lucky he comes from such a small state. Easier to create a dynasty with little opposition.

I like Joe. He's dedicated his life to trying to help people. I don't hear him demonizing anyone. I've voting for Hillary, but I like being proud of my President and VP.

[quote]I can't wait to see this cow get beat out in the primaries.

Oh honey, bring a snack. Ain't gonna happen.

[quote]Hillary probably leaks into depends.

Getting Hillary and your mother mixed up again, are we?

The Hillary hate is a lot less creative than I would have expected. Nobody attacking her daughter? Bill has been done to almost death. Nobody is saying anything new. The tiresomeness is rather...tiresome.

[quote] "Hillary probably leaks into depends.". Getting Hillary and your mother mixed up again, are we?

Actually I think he's getting Hillary and his underwear drawer mixed up.

She's dumb, she's stupid, she lied, and she got caught............the perfect American politician! 🗽

Bill, I think that when Hillary is President, you should simply be called The Former President. No name needed.

WE are all still voting-going with Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hmmm....A top Hillary campaign donor is ready to jump ship if Papa Joe decides to run. Other donors and muck-a-de-mucks in the party are becoming increasingly concerned that the e-mail issue is not going away any time soon and no one really knows where the investigation is heading. They certainly don't consider it a non-issue or much a do about nothing. Many are critical of the way she has chosen to address it and how the campaign is being run. r246 got it right. Some power brokers within the party see Biden as the Democratic;) answer to counter Trump's so-called straight talking style of campaigning which is proving to be very effective. Even with people who find him personally repugnant. Voters who do not trust Hillary want a candidate who is going to tell it like it is but who also shares their values and sticks to his or her principles and is not going to sell them out. The people who like Bernie, but know that he cannot win a national election, and who also like Warren, but are convinced that she is not going to run, are going to take another look at Biden. They like and trust Joe. They see him as a decent man who never forgot where he came from and loyal to a fault. Everyone knows he comes with baggage. Are a few potentially embarrassing gaffes from someone who will work for the middle class and the disenfranchised and has the balls to stand up to Putin and the Chinese and who will keep his promises and knows how to WORK with Republicans to get those things done a reason to write him off?. Hillary is someone who hasn't walked it the way she talks it for a very long time. She doesn't have to. Why walk when you can ride in a limousine? Or take that private plane to Martha's Vineyard? Hillary and Bill have acquired Champagne tastes and like rolling with big money. He can still sell himself as a man of the people because no one is better at making people feel like he really cares about them. In part because he does have a big ole heart. But the allure of big ole bucks was too tempting. She comes off as a polished politician who doesn't have a clue as to how to talk with "regular folks" anymore. And would rather be ANYWHERE else than another State Fair rubbing shoulders with the rubes with their fried butter and corn dogs and pie eating contests, side-stepping cowpies in her Manolos. Then there is that little Valerie Jarrett problem. Which means Hillary has an Obama problem. Would she be a better President than any of the Republican Clown Car Posse? Yes, of course. But don't think for a minute she has this shit locked up. Whispers of ABH are going to get louder if she doesn't get her shit together and starts fighting back. I think r246 gives a good analysis of why she might be unable to do that. And she has no one else but herself to blame.

Doh! My admiration is for r236. Not r246. I think you have presented a rational explanation as to why she seems so bumbling, lost, and out of character in her responses to the e-mail controversy. She's hiding out in Bumfucke and playing rope-a-dope with the press. It worked for Bonnie and Clyde but they weren't seen as "untrustworthy" or "dishonest". Folks liked them. Does anyone working on her campaign actually like this woman?

I wish Obama would have one of his "grow up" moments and call this out for what it is, complete bullshit. I think that would really help the situation actually. Especially since the Hillary-hating press tries to make the whole thing sound legitimate by saying the Obama Administration is "investigating" her. They are not. That is a Republican talking point not a fact.

The rumor is Valerie Jarrett leaked the e-mail story. She would never do that without Obama's okay. Does anyone really believe that Hillary chose to use her own IP server because it was just more convenient? Or was she afraid that using a government IP would make it easier for her enemies within the administration to keep tabs on her? And Bill?

[quote]You mean like when Dubya choked on a pretzel and hit his head? Something like that? Allegedly.

Dubya was a drunken drug addict. Hillary is a recovering stroke victim. There is a big difference.

Do you have clearance r,241?

State Dept. sez there was no policy against Hillary using her personal email.

Nice try, wingnuts.

Maybe try that Vince Foster puppet show again?

30 days. Tops.

R258, I'm sure there's always room for 30 Tops in the State Department.

Bye Felicia

Hillary is proof that if you live by the lies then you DIE by the lies!!!!!! LOL She's a messed-up brassy-blond, grey-rooted hag!

[quote] Hillary is proof that if you live by the lies then you DIE by the lies!!!!!! LOL She's a messed-up brassy-blond, grey-rooted hag!

Translation: She has a vagina! Vagina! Benghaziiii! Vagina! Benghaziiiii! Benghaziiiii!

She's toast.

R251 Use paragraphs the next time you want to rant. Most of what I can decipher in that jumbled mess is ridiculous at best!

R263 If she's toast, what DOES that make gaffe machine Jeb? Or I can smell pizza from a mile away Christie?

HILLARY POTUS 2016

Well, she does have the biggest potamus I've ever seen!

Forget the e-mail fiasco. A growing number of voters, including Democrats, think she is dishonest and not to be trusted. THAT is what she should be worrying about. Hiding out in Bumfucke on another bullshit "discovery tour" while ducking the press and refusing to sit down and address the issue head on is not helping her image. She acts like a person who has something to hide. Read the writing on the wall. Carville and Jerry Brown are going public with appeals to Biden not to run. You can smell the desperation. And that was BEFORE Obama gave Biden his blessing. If Biden wants to run for President then more power to him. There will be major blowback if it appears that anyone in Clinton's campaign is trying to strong arm Biden into backing down.

Hillary is a lying criminal!

Faux News. As far as Ailes is concerned she is the NEXT antichrist.

Tonight on Fox Entertainment: ...America's Next Antichrist.

r269 Actually, if you carefully look at Hillary when she opens her eyes so wide, she looks like the anti-Christ.

r270, claiming to know what the anti-Christ looks like is psychotic.

Hillary is not the Anti-Christ. She is more of a Whore of Babylon type.

Oops! The face of Democrats!

Here is the anti-Christ!

UNTRUSTWORTHY? Give me a break here!

Like THAT stopped Nixon from being elected or Shrub from being selected. Both were shady from the word go.

If we use that litmus test, explain why Cheney was Vice President.

It's all because she's a Clinton and therefore we must kill it!

Rinse That Priebus: KILL IT! KILL IT BEFORE IT ESCAPES! NOW BEFORE IT GETS INTO THE WHITE HOUSE! BENGHAZI DIDN'T WORK! HURRY! FIND SOMETHING ELSE BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!

As you RedState/Drudge/Breibart/DailyCaller trolls that frequent any site that brings up HRC know that horrible monster must be destroyed at all costs.

She will be the second coming of FDR.

[quote]Hillary is a lying criminal!

Funny that you should bring up Mukasey, R268. I listened to the NPR interview he gave where he tried to defend his editorial. Notable in that interview is that he could not defend a single one of his accusations. He had not one shred of actual data that supported anything he wrote. Everything was hypothetical. Basically, what it came down to was, "If Hillary did something illegal, then she would have broken the law." Duh. Seriously, it was just that kind of illogical, circular reasoning.

You are delusional, paranoid or smoking some K2 if you believe that this thread is infested with Republican party operatives and FREEPERS! Spoiler Alert: Hillary Rodham Clinton is a REPUBLICAN. Some of you are dumber than dirt.

hillary's backers will stop at nothing to convince you that she is a trustworthy saint! I can't believe that people are so gullible as to believe their BS spin that she didn't think that anything she did was considered classified. Hell, if nothing she did was "classified", then what did she do as secretary of state? Exactly! hillary is a grade-A-certified liar and is funded by trial attorneys and socialists. True Americans need to stand up and stop this false prophet that is hillary!

Hilary's enemies will stop at nothing to convince you she is Lady Dracula.

I can't believe YOU people are so gullible as to believe the Daily Caller/Breitbart that she did EVERYTHING wrong and must pay with her life.

Hell if wasn't so busy messing around with that fucking server like the expert IT she is, she wouldn't have to kill those 4 Americans BENGHAZI! and she could do the job she was paid for! Exactly! You agree don't you?

Hillary according to Rush is a known liar and must be destroyed at all costs. Besides, she funded by calling Communists and Nancy Grace who was a prosecutor (just a reminder in case you forgot).

True Americans need to stand up fight Lady Dracula to the death! Hunt her down if you have to

...see how THAT works... Cretin.

Who's the Aids infected faggggot who keeps posting these ridiculous photos hopped pics of Hillary? Give it up faggggot. She ain't gonna win.

Sorry r281. Your stinky, rancid cunt won't put out the huge grease fire that's coming your way soon.

Interesting, I have 281 blocked but when I hover over the link in 282 THE SAME FUCKING ASSHOLE shows up and validates why I have it blocked.

Hillary would be blocking 99% of the posters on Datalounge.

"Even as the media talk continues of how her campaign is in trouble, popular sentiment reflected by the numbers says that she’s still the most popular Presidential candidate in modern history."

Suck it, Freepers.

And in a poll released today Biden is seen as the Democrat who has the best chance of beating Trump. Notice that the Hillary supporters are the nastiest and cannot make their case without doing a Captain Renault? FREEPERS! FREEPERS EVERYWHERE! They refuse to face the facts. The people posting here who are the most critical of her are other DEMOCRATS. And what was that bush;) league move she pulled reciting all of Biden's personal tragedies? Why, oh why, didn't one of those pain in the ass journalists ask her what she thought of the quote attributed to Beau Biden that " the country will be better off with Biden values than Clinton values." Oh, Monica. Paging Monica Lewinsky. How's the book coming, Hon?

[quote] And in a poll released today Biden is seen as the Democrat who has the best chance of beating Trump. Notice that the Hillary supporters are the nastiest and cannot make their case without doing a Captain Renault? FREEPERS! FREEPERS EVERYWHERE! They refuse to face the facts. The people posting here who are the most critical of her are other DEMOCRATS. And what was that bush;) league move she pulled reciting all of Biden's personal tragedies? Why, oh why, didn't one of those pain in the ass journalists ask her what she thought of the quote attributed to Beau Biden that " the country will be better off with Biden values than Clinton values." Oh, Monica. Paging Monica Lewinsky. How's the book coming, Hon?

You are referring to the Quinnipiac University poll. According to Quinnipiac, Clinton Sanders and Biden lead in every Republican match up, except for Sanders v/s Rubio. Biden has a 3 point lead on Hillary in a race against Trump.

[QUOTE]You are referring to the Quinnipiac University poll. According to Quinnipiac, Clinton Sanders and Biden lead in every Republican match up, except for Sanders v/s Rubio. Biden has a 3 point lead on Hillary in a race against Trump.

It also showed that in the primary - meaning, among the Democratic base - she had 45 percent of the vote while Sanders had 22 and Biden 18. Which once again puts the lie to semi-hysterical rage fantasies like r286.

[quote]The people posting here who are the most critical of her are other DEMOCRATS.

The people posting here who are the most critical of her are MEAT PUPPETS CLAIMING to be Democrats.

What, is this your first day at DL?

Of course you DO know quinnie pee pee is run by the GOP. They WILL say and do anything to make sure Republicans stay in charge including the WHITE HOUSE.

If Morning Joke is quoting their skewed stats daily, that ought to tell you something.

Fun fact: Our own reliable Nate Silver STILL has HRC in the WH in 2017. Hasn't been wrong yet about Dems or The GOP.

Quinnipiac Polls are just another GOP rubber stamp.

Meaningless.

[quote] Quinnipiac Polls are just another GOP rubber stamp. Meaningless.

The poll shows democrats ahead.

The polls are deceptive. They're hiding the truth about the "statistics". Notice how the numbers keep changing. It is because, ... oh wait...

It just goes to show that the GOP is in some serious trouble if this shit polling university shows Democrats ahead.

[quote]The polls are deceptive. They're hiding the truth about the "statistics". Notice how the numbers keep changing. It is because, ... oh wait...

I would love to hear the end of this clearly half-formed thought.

[quote]Notice how the numbers keep changing.

From poll to poll and week to week? Yeah... and? That's kind of how polling works.

[quote] It just goes to show that the GOP is in some serious trouble if this shit polling university shows Democrats ahead

WE already know that the GOP is in trouble that's a given!

POTUS Hillary it will happen!

Do you actually believe your own bullshit or are you just stupid, r289? You seem to have an agenda and that is to deflect and redirect any criticism leveled at Clinton. Meatpuppet? Is that what the kids are calling FREEPERS? "semi-hysterical rage fantasies"? Like the kind TERRORISTS have? Glad I hit a nerve. I see she's breaking out the "I'm not sitting here like some little woman standing by my man, like Tammy Wynette" phony southern accent. A sure sign that what she's saying is pure BULL.

David Ignatius writes in The Washington Post about the "Hillary Clinton Email 'Scandal' That Isn't":

It's cute how r299 froths at the mouth like a lunatic but convinces herself she "hit a nerve."

r290 Are you 12?

Can someone check on R290?