Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

New Hampshire school officials distance selves from 'bias-free language guide'

New Hampshire school officials distance selves from 'bias-free language guide'

The guide, developed by University of New Hampshire students and staff in 2013, attracted little attention until a conservative news site featured it this week

Associated Press in Concord, New Hampshire, Wednesday 29 July 2015 16.42 EDT

The president of the University of New Hampshire said on Wednesday he is troubled and offended by many parts of a “bias-free language guide” posted on the school’s website, particularly a suggestion that using the word “American” is problematic because it fails to recognize South America.

The guide, developed by students and staff in 2013, attracted little attention until this week, when it was featured on the conservative news site Campus Reform. Asked about it on Wednesday, the university president, Mark Huddleston, said the guide is not campus policy.

“While individuals on our campus have every right to express themselves, I want to make it absolutely clear that the views expressed in this guide are NOT the policy of the University of New Hampshire. I am troubled by many things in the language guide, especially the suggestion that the use of the term ‘American’ is misplaced or offensive,” he said. “The only UNH policy on speech is that it is free and unfettered on our campuses. It is ironic that what was probably a well-meaning effort to be ‘sensitive’ proves offensive to many people, myself included.”

The guide appears as a resource on a UNH website detailing the university’s efforts to create an inclusive, diverse and equitable community. It says it is meant to serve as a “starting point” to encourage critical thinking about terms commonly used in conversation and writing.

One section warns against the terms “older people, elders, seniors, senior citizens”. It suggests “people of advanced age” as preferable, though it notes that some have “reclaimed” the term “old people”. Other preferred terms include “person of material wealth” instead of rich, “person who lacks advantages that others have” instead of poor and “people of size” to replace the word overweight.

In another suggestion unlikely to gain traction in New England, the guide suggests “y’all” as a better option than “guys” when referring to a group of people.

State senator Jeb Bradley, a Republican from Wolfeboro, said he was outraged by the guide and would remember it when lawmakers next consider how much money to provide to the university.

“Implying the word ‘American’ is not appropriate to use on campus is un-American to say the least,” he said. “Will UNH next propose to change our Live Free or Die motto to Live Free but Upset No One?”

It’s unclear when Huddleston became aware of the guide. A university spokeswoman said it was created by a “small group of community members”, though a report submitted by the President’s Commission on the Status of People with Disabilities last year describes it as a “4-commission effort”. The college also has a commission on women, people of color and gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender issues. The leaders of the four groups did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Wednesday.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17June 22, 2020 11:16 PM

Social justice warriors.

by Anonymousreply 1July 29, 2015 11:52 PM

@LosFelizDaycare 10 hours ago

Apricot (3) found a frog and it resulted in two incident reports - kissing someone without consent and perpetuating patriarchal stereotypes.

by Anonymousreply 2July 29, 2015 11:59 PM

Wow, that's fucking scary. Diluting language like that is dangerous and not without precedent.

by Anonymousreply 3July 29, 2015 11:59 PM

@LosFelizDaycare Jun 27

Any parents that haven't changed their Facebook profile picture to the Pride filter run risk of extra volunteer time in the community garden

by Anonymousreply 4July 30, 2015 12:00 AM

Really, what the fuck do you expect when you allow university students to draw up the guidelines? I bet they were falling over themselves trying to out-SJW each other.

by Anonymousreply 5July 30, 2015 12:06 AM

How did this change so suddenly? I'm in my late 20s and couldn't imagine this happening and I went to fucking Bowdoin.

by Anonymousreply 6July 30, 2015 12:12 AM

[quote] One section warns against the terms “older people, elders, seniors, senior citizens”. It suggests “people of advanced age” as preferable

Interesting. I wonder what the PC terminology is for “eldergay.”

by Anonymousreply 7June 22, 2020 2:37 PM

"Knock, knock, knockin' on heaven's door" for older citizens.

by Anonymousreply 8June 22, 2020 3:03 PM

^ OFFENSIVE TO ATHEISTS! BASTARD!

by Anonymousreply 9June 22, 2020 3:06 PM

^ OFFENSIVE TO ALTERNATIVE PARENTING PARADIGMS! LOW PRIORITIZER OF CONVENTIONAL INTELLIGENCE!

by Anonymousreply 10June 22, 2020 3:06 PM

[QUOTE]what was probably a well-meaning effort to be ‘sensitive’ proves offensive to many people

This is true. These people exist in their bubble. The rest of us carry on talking. From six feet apart, of course.

by Anonymousreply 11June 22, 2020 3:07 PM

ANOTHER bumped 5 year old thread? WHY????

by Anonymousreply 12June 22, 2020 3:12 PM

Dear non existent deity it's bad enough we know have to qualify as cis gendered etc. Now this? I mean come on it doesn't get any more PC. People of Advance age. Christ on a stick.

by Anonymousreply 13June 22, 2020 3:37 PM

Muriel, please, for the love of God get these bumping trolls under control. They are exhausting.

by Anonymousreply 14June 22, 2020 3:45 PM

people of advanced age discriminates against old furries.

by Anonymousreply 15June 22, 2020 3:47 PM

R7, “People who are 67 but can pass for 23”

by Anonymousreply 16June 22, 2020 3:51 PM

[quote]ANOTHER bumped 5 year old thread? WHY????

The past seven days have been really bad for Trump. Someone is trying to bury the threads where we ridicule him.

by Anonymousreply 17June 22, 2020 11:16 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!