Will sexism kill Hillary's Presidential bid?
|by Anonymous||reply 55||Last Tuesday at 6:27 PM|
no but her lying mouth will
|by Anonymous||reply 1||07/21/2015|
Unfortunately, R1 is right. No one believes her anymore. Very sad.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||07/21/2015|
OMG Just the miserable and old which counts for a smal % so it doesn't matter LOL
|by Anonymous||reply 3||07/21/2015|
Get off my lawn!
|by Anonymous||reply 4||07/21/2015|
It's possible. America is full of juvenile idiots.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||07/21/2015|
It already did once. It probably will again.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||07/21/2015|
Who cares she's still gonna win at the end fuckers
|by Anonymous||reply 7||07/21/2015|
No but her lying about losing public records might.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||07/21/2015|
R5 Yes, it's so "juvenile" to expect a Secretary of State follow the very rules she lectures her staff to follow. It's so juvenile to question why this one person, out of millions of options, is treated as so inevitable by some people.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||07/21/2015|
She did not lose the first campaign because of sexism. She lost because of her racism. Early polls had her ahead of Obama even among blacks.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||07/21/2015|
All the supposed lying she is doing are faux-scandals created by the GOP.
America has seen the GOP trying to demolish the Clintons for decades and we just collectively roll our eyes at this point.
Do you really care that Clinton had a personal email server (big fucking deal and so did Jindal. Jeb! still hasn't released 90% of his emails)? No one cares.
Benghazi? Vindicated by at least 4 GOP-led Congressional panels.
If anyone is telling lies, it's the GOP and America knows it.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||07/21/2015|
Sexism won't kill it, she'll do that just fine on her own. Kim Jong Un got his power because it was his turn as well you know.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||07/21/2015|
I'm ready for the first female President.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||07/21/2015|
[quote]I'm ready for the first female President.
Me too, she'll save the taxpayers 30% on the salary we'd have to pay a man.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||07/21/2015|
R11 Nope. Chris Stevens repeatedly asked for backup and was ignored. She sent a memo telling her staff what not to do, then broke the very rule her fellow Democrats had pushed for. Yes, this is all a big deal and there's much more.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||07/21/2015|
[quote] I'm ready for the first female President.
YES! America is ready for the first female POTUS and her name is: Hillary Clinton
|by Anonymous||reply 16||07/21/2015|
R16 "Yes! I'm ready to succumb to my delusions!"
|by Anonymous||reply 17||07/21/2015|
It'll be too bad if our first female President had to marry her way to the position. A woman who rose to prominence on her own merits rather than her husband's would have been a greater inspiration to young women.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||07/21/2015|
As long as the glass ceiling is broken, it's all good R18.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||07/21/2015|
Sexism is not a problem for over-the-hill Hill. The American voter with more than one functioning brain cell is her problem. Arrogant fangurls who assume the voter is trite, naive and blind is her problem. The bottom line: Hillary Rodham Clinton is Hillary Rodham Clinton's problem.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||07/21/2015|
R18 it's not like she's going from First Lady to President. with nothing else to show for it. She went to law school and was an attorney before being First Lady. Afterward, she was a Senator,and after her first presidential bid floundered, the Secretary of State. She's accumulated quite a resume.
It's funny that the same people who accuse her of being the brains behind Bill's ascent and of being the woman behind the president during Bill's administration are also the same ones who denounce her because of her marriage.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||07/21/2015|
|by Anonymous||reply 22||07/22/2015|
|by Anonymous||reply 23||07/22/2015|
[quote]She did not lose the first campaign because of sexism. She lost because of her racism. Early polls had her ahead of Obama even among blacks.
Blacks backed the black candidate. OMG, stop the presses!
|by Anonymous||reply 24||07/22/2015|
[quote]Arrogant fangurls who assume the voter is trite, naive and blind is her problem.
Sounds like Bernie's fangurls, not Hill's, who beats everyone in every poll she's put in.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||07/22/2015|
[quote]Unfortunately, [R1] is right. No one believes her anymore. Very sad.
Unfortunately, the country backs her over every Republican candidate, and every Democratic candidate. Sad, Bernie.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||07/22/2015|
R25 Like polls 16 months before an election actually mean something.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||07/22/2015|
Okay that was funny r24.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||07/22/2015|
Really r10, her "racism"? I have to say, I have followed every election carefully since Carter/Reagan in 1980, and this is the first I've heard of it.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||07/22/2015|
I still marvel at the large group of (whining) people pushing Bernie Sanders, who could possibly win 6-8 states vs. whichever weasel the GOP puts up. I guess the mean things they say about Democratic circular firing squads is all true.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||07/22/2015|
[quote]Will sexism kill Hillary's Presidential bid?
You mean like it did in 2008?
|by Anonymous||reply 31||07/22/2015|
nope not at all 2016 is Hillary's!
|by Anonymous||reply 32||07/22/2015|
R29 apparently, in 2008, Bill accused the Obama campaign of using the race card, and in turn Hillary's campaign was called 'racist.'
|by Anonymous||reply 33||07/22/2015|
r18 would vote for Michelle Obama if she ran in 2016, then accuse everyone who didn't vote for her of racism.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||07/22/2015|
[quote]It's funny that the same people who accuse her of being the brains behind Bill's ascent and of being the woman behind the president during Bill's administration are also the same ones who denounce her because of her marriage.
What the hell are you talking about? No one has ever said she is the brains behind Bill. What everyone does say, and is true, is that she used her marriage to a powerful man to get everywhere she is.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||07/22/2015|
[quote]No one has ever said she is the brains behind Bill.
You're either retarded or twelve-years-old. In the 90s, it was always "Hillary runs the White House."
|by Anonymous||reply 36||07/22/2015|
Yes, her racism. Hillary was in the lead until she leaked the Obama madrasa stories and started with the spook tactics that were so obviously planted by her camp. The Clintonite lowdown tactics backfired big time and just disgusted the media and the electorate, and got even more people on the Obama wagon. It is a fact that Hillary was polling better than Obama among blacks for most of 2007. This is why I laugh when people call Bernie unelectable and do not take him seriously. Obama was also seen in the same light, until people started to hear him speak and he started getting bigger crowds.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||07/22/2015|
[quote]Hillary was in the lead until she leaked the Obama madrasa stories and started with the spook tactics that were so obviously planted by her camp.
Tinfoil hats workin' overtime.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||07/22/2015|
[quote]This is why I laugh when people call Bernie unelectable and do not take him seriously. Obama was also seen in the same light
Obama came after George W. Bush, you dingbat.
Bernie Sanders: 75-years-old, Socialist, Atheist, Jewish
You sound white and stupid.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||07/22/2015|
Are we really going to pretend Hillary was undone because of sexism? She was the party favorite for most of 2007 and was seen as the inevitable victor. She had one of the biggest falls of a Democratic frontrunner ever, only second to Howard Dean. She needs Axelrod if she wants to run a masterful campaign this time around.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||07/22/2015|
Yes OP. It already is.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||08/12/2015|
|by Anonymous||reply 42||08/14/2015|
The conservative Dems on DL love Hil.
She can't win. Way too much baggage. No one will vote for her just because she's a woman (they shouldn't anyway, that's tokenism). If the Repukes nominate a far-right loon, she might win, but we all know they're going to go with Jeb Bush. She can't win against Bush. She is too unlikable, too conservative for young Dems to get excited about her, and then there's BILL. All that stuff about his affairs will come flooding out again, Gennifer flowers will be on TV every day, and Lewinsky will write another book. America won't go for it. As much as they're tired of Bushes, they'll be much more tired of Clintons.
I'd rather see Biden get the nod. He's a real liberal, he's likable, he has the Obama association.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||08/14/2015|
No, arrogance and an inability to face the music for her deeds will.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||08/14/2015|
I'm thinking a stroke will. Or Bill is going to Cosbyed. Then Hillary will have to try, with a straight face, to tell she knew nothing about it, didn't help smear her victims after the fact, and is indeed, as she has self-labeled herself, a "fierce advocate for women and children."
|by Anonymous||reply 45||08/14/2015|
In 2008 she was in it to win it. She wanted the job and she went after it with all she had. It was exhilarating;) to watch her on the stump. Unfortunately for her a couple of Obama operatives were able to put enough doubt in the minds of black voters, who were probably looking for a reason to abandon the Clinton's for Obama, who are we kidding, and that really hurt her. Plus, the Obama campaign used social media brilliantly and went after the youth vote like a Kennedy on steroids. Everyone else had written them off. I was disappointed tha Hillary didn't win the nomination in 2008. It's taken me years to appreciate just what a great President Obama has become. This time around she looks like she would rather be anywhere else than on the campaign trail. She doesn't appear to have the fight in her to do battle with a bunch of Bozos who shouldn't be running a dry cleaning store let alone the country. She's going through the motions because the Clinton's are all about making HISTORY. It's not gonna happen for her. Sad, but true. Isn't there anyone else in the Democratic party who qualifies for that job? Or has a fire in his or her belly to run? Castro perhaps? Did O'Malley give up? I haven't heard a thing about him in weeks.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||08/14/2015|
|by Anonymous||reply 47||08/15/2015|
Sexism has nothing to do with it. Obama's Six-Point Plan , orchestrated by Valerie Jarrett, will sink Hill.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||08/15/2015|
To answer OP's question: No, but that's the excuse she'll settle on since she's vehemently against accepting personal responsibility.
If she were a man, like David Petraeus, nobody would say anything about her processing unclassified emails on an unclassified server!
|by Anonymous||reply 49||08/15/2015|
Some resume r21.
As senator, she accomplished nothing. And as SoS, she helped make the world less safe than it was before.
Zero accomplishments except having tits and a gash.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||08/15/2015|
This is Hilbot's 500-plus thread about Hillary Clinton. Enough, troll!
|by Anonymous||reply 51||08/15/2015|
You all should have listened to r1
|by Anonymous||reply 52||Last Tuesday at 5:27 PM|
FUCK YOU TROLL. FF. Blocked
|by Anonymous||reply 53||Last Tuesday at 6:18 PM|
|by Anonymous||reply 54||Last Tuesday at 6:20 PM|
BUT BUT BUT... bumping 2015 threads will kill you and your mom, R52. Just gag and die of painful and terrible death, CUNT!
|by Anonymous||reply 55||Last Tuesday at 6:27 PM|