Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Photos of Gay Pride in the 1980's

I wonder if many are still around? Kinda sad.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 99May 17, 2020 4:40 AM

What's sad is that it looks like it could be today. All pictures of beautiful boys with beautiful bodies. The gay community still won't recognize the average, the overweight or the ugly.

by Anonymousreply 1June 21, 2015 4:31 PM

And it will always be that way R1 .

by Anonymousreply 2June 21, 2015 4:50 PM

I want to know about Mud Sex Club. Is it like Fight Club? Tell me!

by Anonymousreply 3June 21, 2015 5:06 PM

Love pics 6, 43 and 55.

by Anonymousreply 4June 21, 2015 5:08 PM

Too many mustaches, ill pass.

by Anonymousreply 5June 21, 2015 5:16 PM

But R5 think of all the free mustache rides!

by Anonymousreply 6June 21, 2015 5:18 PM

All that joy and love soon to be swept away by the tidal wave of HIV. Thankfully I washed ashore.

by Anonymousreply 7June 21, 2015 5:25 PM

What really struck me about he photos of 80s LA Pride was the lack of Asians and Latinos. Was LA really that white back then?

by Anonymousreply 8June 21, 2015 5:28 PM

Love the bodies...and no tattoos

by Anonymousreply 9June 21, 2015 5:32 PM

The permed mullet: may it rest in peace. But it's nice to see people having fun.

by Anonymousreply 10June 21, 2015 5:44 PM

No hideous Andrew Christian underwear!

by Anonymousreply 11June 21, 2015 5:48 PM

All the feathered hair and mullets are funny. People actually thought those hairstyles were attractive, for some bizarre reason.

And I also didn't see a single tattoo.

by Anonymousreply 12June 21, 2015 5:50 PM

I'm a millennial so this was my first time seeing these. Going through the pics, I was relieved to see that at least half of the guys there were really fit! That was nice to see. Fuck all the fatties, skinnies and average idiots. Also, 1 big difference I saw is that in those pics, most of the guys appear to be NORMAL-looking and not dressed in freakish or embarrassing garb. I didn't see overly tatted guys, guys with millions of piercings or guys with way too much facial hair. I'm not into mustaches but I'd gladly take that over the bushy beard trend we're seeing now. When and why did gay culture devolve into freakish-looking gays? It's awful.

Also round of applause for the dearly departed former mayor of Chicago Harold Washington. It was great to see a black mayor in the 80s support gays.

by Anonymousreply 13June 21, 2015 5:51 PM

R10. We called it The Poodle Perm!

I'm happy to say I thought it was ugly at the time. I had a roommate who got one. He was flipping it girlishly one time and it snagged in the latch of an enormous medicine cabinet-like spice rack in our apartment. The whole thing came off the wall, opened, spewing its contents everywhere while remaining attached to his giant hair. The weight of it yanked his head violently to one side and just hung there, door open and empty.

This was during the NBA Finals in about 1981 in Boston. I had about eight friends over to watch the game. We were pretty baked and weren't able to get ourselves under control from laughing at the sight of Mark with the worlds largest spice rack in her Poodle Perm.

by Anonymousreply 14June 21, 2015 6:05 PM

Basically, if you don't have biceps and pecs, then fuck off and die. Some things never change.

by Anonymousreply 15June 21, 2015 7:00 PM

We were the most beautiful generation of gay men and women ever visited upon this country. Amen to all of their souls.

by Anonymousreply 16June 21, 2015 7:15 PM

I click the link and get "Page Not Found"... wtf?

by Anonymousreply 17June 21, 2015 7:19 PM

R15, if you look hard enough, you'll see all sorts of average-shaped and out-of-shape people in those pics. Gay men and lesbians and their friends of all types went to those events and had good times. What's scary is wondering how many of those men were infected before such weekends were over. Not too many people who contracted HIV back then are still alive today.

by Anonymousreply 18June 21, 2015 7:21 PM

Can't see ANYTHING. Just a "page not found". No pics.

by Anonymousreply 19June 21, 2015 7:23 PM

Looking at those pics, you can't help wondering how many of those guys are dead.

by Anonymousreply 20June 21, 2015 7:24 PM

[quote]We were the most beautiful generation of gay men and women ever visited upon this country.

Talk about subjective. Have you not seen the current crop of gays?

by Anonymousreply 21June 21, 2015 7:27 PM

R21, you mean the ones with arms full of prison tats and waxed bodies? UGH!!

by Anonymousreply 22June 21, 2015 7:53 PM

I think there may be a slight chance that the photographer was more interested in snapping the beauties than the slubs.

But maybe that's because it's what superficial me would do.

by Anonymousreply 23June 21, 2015 8:06 PM

No tattoos, platforms and topiary facial hair. There was something so sunkissed and sexy about them, but I wasn't born til 88 so maybe I am romancing the 80sinto something they were not.

by Anonymousreply 24June 21, 2015 8:17 PM

Gay Man Says Gay Pride Parade Gross Distasteful & Reinforces Stereotypes

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25June 21, 2015 8:18 PM

Yeah, still no pics... just "Page not found".

by Anonymousreply 26June 21, 2015 8:32 PM

r26 try another browser.

by Anonymousreply 27June 21, 2015 8:56 PM

Great pics. We may laugh at the mullets and frosted tips, but I'm sure in 20 or 30 years, the Tin Tin haircuts and fauxhawks of the 2000-2010s will look equally silly.

I see a lot of average and untoned bodies in there, but nobody seriously overweight. The US obesity epidemic didn't really kick in until the late '90s.

by Anonymousreply 28June 21, 2015 9:36 PM

Pic 17 showing off his huge sack!

by Anonymousreply 29June 21, 2015 9:50 PM

Hairy hole @ pic 55.

by Anonymousreply 30June 21, 2015 9:53 PM

Just a bunch of vapid narcissists. Next!

by Anonymousreply 31June 21, 2015 10:09 PM

Majority of DL agrees with commentator at R25

by Anonymousreply 32June 21, 2015 10:13 PM

[quote] What really struck me about he photos of 80s LA Pride was the lack of Asians and Latinos. Was LA really that white back then?

No, just selective photography.

by Anonymousreply 33June 21, 2015 10:18 PM

In the background, LA is so ugly and "blah" looking compared to SF and Chicago.

by Anonymousreply 34June 21, 2015 10:18 PM

This trio are proto DLers, just waiting for the internet to be invented so they can post 'once again it's gingers presenting their holes wearing only socks!!'

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35June 21, 2015 10:21 PM

R28 is right, the skinny jeans and the bow ties and the nerd specs and the beards of today's genderqueers will look even more funny than a permed mullet and high waisted 'dad jeans'.

by Anonymousreply 36June 21, 2015 10:23 PM

r35's pics are 80's porn stars.

by Anonymousreply 37June 21, 2015 10:33 PM

And in the distance, the echo's of Last Dance richocheted off the flat, white, tombstones. The raspberry sun dipped and dimmed mournfully beneath its thin thread of life and everywhere did the Ravens scream: Water! Water! Water!

by Anonymousreply 38June 21, 2015 10:38 PM

The body hair was much sexier then. Now, guys are looking more like shaved girls.

by Anonymousreply 39June 21, 2015 10:49 PM

I get to the Advocate site, but that site says "page not found". How the fuck are you guys seeing anything? THE LINK IS BAD.

by Anonymousreply 40June 21, 2015 10:50 PM

The guys look really hot, in comparison to the trashy tattoo look now.

by Anonymousreply 41June 21, 2015 10:54 PM

[quote]And in the distance, the echo's of Last Dance richocheted off the flat, white, tombstones. The raspberry sun dipped and dimmed mournfully beneath its thin thread of life and everywhere did the Ravens scream: Water! Water! Water!

That's poetic and awful at the same time.

by Anonymousreply 42June 21, 2015 10:55 PM

I liked pic 113. I don't know how dudes carried around huge and heavy boomboxes on their shoulders all day. However they dd have portable cassette players back in 87 and cd players were starting to emerge. I still have my cassette and cd player collections and never threw them out.

by Anonymousreply 43June 21, 2015 11:14 PM

people were thinner back then because they didn't stay at home at night glued to their entertainment centers, laptops, etc. They physically moved and bicycles were considered too nerdy to use so they walked. Additionally the foods back then were not infested with GMO's and other hidden chemicals, like trans fats, to induce obesity.

by Anonymousreply 44June 21, 2015 11:19 PM

Those 80s fashions may look dated today, but I think they look better and "cleaner," so to speak, than the hipster shit a lot of gay guys wear now. And don't even get me started on the beards, tats and piercings. None of the guys in the '87 pics look like they could be homeless or junkies like so many hipster guys.

And no, I'm not an elder. I was 9 years old back in '87.

by Anonymousreply 45June 21, 2015 11:21 PM

OP's link doesn't work in Chrome or IE...

by Anonymousreply 46June 21, 2015 11:36 PM

It works for me in Chrome

by Anonymousreply 47June 21, 2015 11:41 PM

[quote]Additionally the foods back then were not infested with GMO's and other hidden chemicals...

That is a scientifically illiterate, and fact-free screed. You sound like a flouride-fighting anti-vaxxer!

The biggest "chemical" in food is salt, and "GMOs" are no different than any other produce. You simply don't have facts or reason on your side, but you do have SHRIEKING!

by Anonymousreply 48June 21, 2015 11:54 PM

I'm using Chrome and it works just fine.

by Anonymousreply 49June 22, 2015 12:15 AM

Uhhhh, but it was LA so they no doubt spent a lot of time sitting on their asses in a car.

by Anonymousreply 50June 22, 2015 12:19 AM

Much hotter guys, barring the goofy hairstyles. Love the chest hair and neatly groomed facial hair! Nice to see fewer to no tats or piercings. I'm 24 and hate the homeless junkie tin-tin look.

by Anonymousreply 51June 22, 2015 12:19 AM

"All that joy and love soon to be swept away by the tidal wave of HIV"

Approx. 50,000 new seroconversions per year, according to the CDC. Not much has changed (except the drugs).

by Anonymousreply 52June 22, 2015 12:19 AM

The AIDS crisis was already in full swing by 1987. Rather than crying, I see a bunch of brave people still gathering to show the world that gays weren't going to run back into the closet.

by Anonymousreply 53June 22, 2015 1:03 AM

OK R42. So they screamed, "Nevermore!". You happy now?

by Anonymousreply 54June 22, 2015 1:07 AM

This definitely has the feel of 70-80's gay.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 55June 22, 2015 1:11 AM

Body hair was appreciated back then.

by Anonymousreply 56June 22, 2015 1:13 AM

My gosh, 80s fashions were so awful. The big poofy hair. The big poofy socks coming out of the high tops. The big loose bright-colored t shirts tucked into tight faded jeans. UGH! So ugly.

by Anonymousreply 57June 22, 2015 1:15 AM

At least I figured out why the link isn't working. The URL is truncated at the first hyphen, just like messages are being.

I'm guessing that nobody on the Legacy site can get the link to work, but it might be working on the 'new' site.

by Anonymousreply 58June 22, 2015 1:21 AM

Way hotter and self-respecting than what we see today.

The lack of tattoos is heavenly.

by Anonymousreply 59June 22, 2015 1:22 AM

R59:

[quote]Way hotter and self

That is the entire contents of your post as I see it... completely truncated at the first hyphen.

by Anonymousreply 60June 22, 2015 1:24 AM

The fashion was very trailer park-esque. It goes to show that the media can convince us to wear just about anything.

by Anonymousreply 61June 22, 2015 1:25 AM

80s sucked, and not in the good way.

by Anonymousreply 62June 22, 2015 1:32 AM

They were really out into the streets celebrating the demise of the previous decade's hideous apparel!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 63June 22, 2015 1:53 AM

[quote]Those 80s fashions may look dated today, but I think they look better and "cleaner," so to speak, than the hipster shit a lot of gay guys wear now. And don't even get me started on the beards, tats and piercings. None of the guys in the '87 pics look like they could be homeless or junkies like so many hipster guys.

Agree with your comments, nowadays the tattoo fad is just awful looking in every which way.

by Anonymousreply 64June 22, 2015 1:57 AM

My era. All my friends were young and gorgeous like this. Everybody was a runner and/or weight lifter. I knew a bunch of female body builders. We all thought we looked amazing!

An old friend recently showed me photos of a gay event in 1985 and we resembled these photos rather closely! I knew virtually every person pictured and about 80% of them are now dead; most died before 1995. About 35 of my closest friends died of AIDS and I was acquainted with maybe one hundred others who perished. Sadly, beauty doesn't mean invulnerability.

I don't even remember thinking about gay marriage thirty years ago but so much has changed for the better for gay men. I'll never forget that brief era when we were muscular and bronzed and wore feathered hair and short shorts!

by Anonymousreply 65June 22, 2015 2:01 AM

Who's the fucking anti-tattoo troll? Where are you that you're seeing millions and millions of tattoos on young men nowadays? I've bedded tons - none with tattoos.

by Anonymousreply 66June 22, 2015 2:16 AM

r14 I can't stop laughing picturing that. Great story and well told!

by Anonymousreply 67June 22, 2015 3:19 AM

[quote]Who's the fucking anti-tattoo troll?

There are lots of people on this board who find tattoos trashy and evidence of poor decision-making abilities. I can't say I disagree. There are plenty of otherwise hot guys who have some really unfortunate tattoos randomly placed on their bodies. Even the little tiny ones take a 10 down to a 6.

by Anonymousreply 68June 22, 2015 3:24 AM

Huge tattoos, especially sleeve and neck, are a deal breaker with me. Sorry, can't do it. Will be your friend though, as I understand wanting to express yourself and be counter-culture, rock and roll, and all that.

However, it is such a huge turn-off that I immediately disengage from you. Maybe that's a good thing--maybe you need to weed out the more traditional types from your life.

Either way, it's a win-win because your tattoos let me know, immediately, where I stand with you and we do not have to waste time on a dinner date.

by Anonymousreply 69June 22, 2015 3:31 AM

It looks like a casting call for a Bijou Video porn!

by Anonymousreply 70June 22, 2015 3:54 AM

We didn't need tatoos then! We had FACES!

by Anonymousreply 71June 22, 2015 4:07 AM

I have no desire to look at those pics. Too painful. I was in my 20's in the 80's. Yes, we looked preppy and clean and muscular and beautiful. We WERE a better looking generation than the current crop of idiots but, then again, doesn't every generation think that they were the best? But the 80's were terrifying, painful and sad, too. Mostly that. AIDS killed a generation of talent. The world would be a more beautiful place if AIDS had not decimated so many artists, designers, talented people of all walks of life. A large chunk of a generation of gay men was wiped from the planet. Those pics would just make me sad sad sad.

by Anonymousreply 72June 22, 2015 4:10 AM

[quote]Who's the fucking anti-tattoo troll? Where are you that you're seeing millions and millions of tattoos on young men nowadays?

There's no 'single' troll, anti-tattoo numb nuts.

[quote]I've bedded tons - none with tattoos

what happened 40 years ago doesn't count

by Anonymousreply 73June 22, 2015 4:11 AM

[quote]We didn't need tatoos then! We had FACES!

We didn't need tattoos then, we had MULLETS!

by Anonymousreply 74June 22, 2015 4:18 AM

It's bizarre reading all of these posts about how amazing looking these very average looking guys are. Water seeks its own level I guess.

by Anonymousreply 75June 22, 2015 4:23 AM

Back in the day LA had smog, but it was still a happening place.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 76June 22, 2015 4:45 AM

But it was a big deal in LA compared to this teeny tiny little parade in Toronto in 1985. Talk about a place which has changed radically since then.... Even the gay activists in this clip referred to gays as "them"!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 77June 22, 2015 4:55 AM

I remember how the news would always focus on the off the beaten path people in the parades, like the nuns in chains.

by Anonymousreply 78June 22, 2015 6:55 AM

Odd, I grew up then, in L.A. no less, and those photos do not make me the least bit nostalgic. I swear, it looks like a war zone that some of us survived. Sorry to be a downer, that's just my major impression (and I had a great time in the 80s, no less, got laid a lot, fell in love... but I don't remember ever really liking big clusterfuck celebratoins, even in my youth).

by Anonymousreply 79June 22, 2015 7:10 AM

Yes - I don't see what the big deal is about these completely average looking '80s Joes. You can find better (and scruffier) looking guys in any LA bar nowadays.

by Anonymousreply 80June 22, 2015 7:44 AM

I've never seen so many striped shorts in all my life.

This picture is just dying for a caption. There's a resentful putto on the left, Wolverine on the right, and I'm not quite sure what to make of the center.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 81June 22, 2015 7:47 AM

[quote]I'm guessing that nobody on the Legacy site can get the link to work, but it might be working on the 'new' site.

I'm on legacy and see the photos just fine.

by Anonymousreply 82June 22, 2015 10:42 AM

Some other older photos of gay marches etc

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 83June 22, 2015 11:34 AM

Anyone remember a gay themed film from the late 70s that had scenes from NY pride? One of the marchers was being interviewed and he said, "We march for the people that can't."

At the end of the story the couple breaks up because one refuses to be monogamous and the other guy moves to California where he meets a like minded guy.

by Anonymousreply 84June 22, 2015 5:12 PM

Notice some of the people in the Toronto parade are trying to hide their faces from the camera. One of the early things antigays used to do was take photos of the marchers, threatening to tell their employers. So it was a reflexive response to hide face from an unknown camera person even while expressing pride by marching in the street. Those were the times.

by Anonymousreply 85June 22, 2015 6:49 PM

Love the shot of Mary Wilson supporting the gays in the LA parade. Good for her. You wouldn't have seen Diana Ross do such a thing in that era.

by Anonymousreply 86June 22, 2015 7:01 PM

R14, that is one of the funniest stories I've ever read on here.

by Anonymousreply 87June 22, 2015 7:14 PM

In pic 35 the sign says "Bring back Tammie!"

Was that an 80s meme?

by Anonymousreply 88June 22, 2015 7:40 PM

I was at one of those prides, but not in a photo.

by Anonymousreply 89June 22, 2015 8:23 PM

I wish we could go back to when Pride was real and not a corporate, branded, government-sanctioned event.

by Anonymousreply 90May 17, 2020 2:26 AM

I notice there were many shirtless guys, and one or two in speedos, but it didn't appear to be nearly as sexual as today.

by Anonymousreply 91May 17, 2020 2:40 AM

I'm assuming the overwhelming majority of the guys in the photos are not alive today.

by Anonymousreply 92May 17, 2020 3:16 AM

And basically any guy who sported that Poodle Perm then and who is still around with us today, by some help by science or their hairdresser will inexplicably still be wearing it in 2020 too.

by Anonymousreply 93May 17, 2020 3:24 AM

I lived in ATL back then and mercifully almost all my friends emerged unscathed or got the bug but did not succumb and are still alive. I never understood the severity or sustainability difference with which it attacked. Some just got lucky. Most didn't.

by Anonymousreply 94May 17, 2020 4:04 AM

My one, out and proud, relative was in ATL at that time, too. Sadly, he succumbed. I never really got to know him. It would have been nice to have had him to talk to, when I hit puberty. Anytime I can find photos showing gay Atlanta from the 1980s and 90s, I search to try and find him.

by Anonymousreply 95May 17, 2020 4:16 AM

Ahhh,... so many ATL stories, so many names to protect.

by Anonymousreply 96May 17, 2020 4:24 AM

R96 LOL, I hope my cousin was one of them.

by Anonymousreply 97May 17, 2020 4:26 AM

I was at that Pride Parade in 1987. AIDS was starting to get more press traction as a mystery gay disease, but the death toll was underway.

Putting that plague aside, for most people these were very happy and optimistic times. No cell phones and no social media. People talked to each other back then. Politics wasn’t considered a normal topic of conversation. You could afford a house or apartment in L.A. on an average income and the economy was good.

Would love to go back to those years, if I knew what I know now.

by Anonymousreply 98May 17, 2020 4:36 AM

Formerly The Blue Parrot?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 99May 17, 2020 4:40 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!