Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Trust Fund Brat, Justin Trudeau Is A Piece Of Shit

"‘We’re shocked': Justin Trudeau went public with reports of misconduct against the wishes of the alleged victims, NDP says"

Two NDP MPs who brought forward allegations of harassment feel blindsided by Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau’s move to go public with the information against their wishes, the NDP says.

Nycole Turmel, NDP whip, said Thursday one of the alleged victims found out through social media that her allegations had become public and that an investigation was being sought.

One of the alleged victims had come to Turmel previously to discuss misconduct allegations, but didn’t want them to become public, Turmel told the Postmedia News. NDP leader Tom Mulcair echoed her remarks at a press conference, saying the alleged victims had a “strong desire to keep this confidential.

“That was their request and we were not about to override that and make them victims a second time,” Mulcair said in Whitby, Ont.

“Anyone who went against that (request) would, of course, be running the risk of making them becoming victims a second time.”

Turmel said neither of the two NDP MPs had wished to file formal complaints, over concerns that the allegations could destroy the careers of Liberal MPs Scott Andrews and Massimo Pacetti.

“Rumours sometimes destroy people’s lives,” Turmel said.

Turmel was to meet with Speaker of the House of Commons Andrew Scheer Thursday to determine what the means will be to investigate the allegations, given that the Commons has no such process in place. It’s only after that meeting that the two alleged victims will know the next steps, or whether they will participate in any investigation.

Trudeau announced Wednesday that Andrews and Pacetti were suspended from the Liberal caucus over allegations of “serious personal misconduct” in how they dealt with two female MPs from another party. He also suspended the two men’s candidacies for the next election pending an investigation.

Neither the nature of the misconduct, nor the identity of the two New Democrats who lodged the complaints, has been detailed by any of the parties. Both Pacetti and Andrews deny wrongdoing.

Also unclear is when the alleged misconduct took place. A report Thursday in Le Journal du Quebec said Liberal MP Scott Simms was aware of allegations as far back as March 2013, but the alleged victim who told him of the misconduct asked him to keep it secret and he did.

What is known is that one of the alleged victims approached Trudeau directly on Oct. 28, when MPs from various parties travelled together to Hamilton, Ont. for the funeral of Cpl. Nathan Cirillo, slain by a gunman at the National War Memorial six days earlier. After the funeral, Trudeau was on a bus on his way back to the airport to fly to Ottawa, when an NDP MP approached him to discuss alleged misconduct by one of the Liberal MPs.

Trudeau said Wednesday he immediately directed Foote to make her counterpart from the NDP aware of this.

When Turmel met Foote on Oct. 29, Turmel said she was only aware of one allegation of wrongdoing. The MP who approached her had told her the details in confidence, asking that they not go any further. Turmel said she was not told the identity of the MP at the centre of the allegations.

“The person said to me, ‘I don’t want this to go anywhere,’ ” she said. “This person said, ‘I will deal with this on my own terms.’”

Turmel wouldn’t say when the conversation took place. She said the NDP tried to help the alleged victim, but she provided few details of what was offered or done.

Turmel said she learned of the second allegation of wrongdoing when she met with Foote. At that time, she also learned Liberals Andrews and Pacetti were at the centre of the allegations.

Turmel said the NDP had heard rumours Wednesday morning that the Liberals were going to take some action on Andrews and Pacetti. She said all she knew for sure before Wednesday was that Pacetti and Andrews were to meet with the Liberal leadership to discuss the allegations.

Mulcair said “there was no prior warning” that the Liberals were going public with the allegations.

Turmel said Liberal whip Foote gave her an envelope marked “confidential” that contained the letter the Liberals were about to give to the Speaker of the House of Commons.

We’re shocked as well that Mr. Trudeau decided to go forward and do a press conference and naming the people involved without telling the alleged victims Turmel was en route to warn one of the alleged victims that news of misconduct allegations was going to the Speaker and would be made public, but the news was already out. Turmel said the alleged victim was upset because she had seen the letter on social media.

Trudeau then held a press conference outlining the allegations, without providing details.

“We’re shocked as well that Mr. Trudeau decided to go forward and do a press conference and naming the people involved without telling the alleged victims,” Turmel said. The NDP says the Liberals did not tell them ahead of time about Trudeau’s plans.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5September 2, 2020 8:36 AM

"John Ivison: Trudeau-Mulcair distrust deepens amid sexual harassment scandal"

It didn’t take long for the consensus about the need to stamp out sexual harassment on Parliament Hill to dissolve, amid poisonous accusations and counter-accusations of partisan chicanery.

The upshot is the odds on a Trudeau-Mulcair coalition after the next election just got considerably longer.

Tom Mulcair, the NDP leader, said Thursday Justin Trudeau’s decision to publicize the sexual harassment complaints by two NDP MPs against two Liberal MPs has victimized the women a second time. (Liberals Scott Andrews and Massimo Pacetti have been suspended from caucus over the allegations. The two NDP MPs have not been named, nor the nature of the allegations revealed, but one of the women is understood to have taken a leave of absence because of what happened.)

Mr. Trudeau, who was an activist in the struggle against date rape and other sexual assaults at university, is said to be spitting mad at the suggestion.

There was never much love lost between the two leaders — now the feeling is if one found the other hanging from a ledge by his fingertips, he’d stamp on them.

The case for the Trudeau defence lies in the circumstances in which he found out about the alleged inappropriate conduct.

He was sitting on a bus leaving Cpl. Nathan Cirillo’s funeral in Hamilton on Oct. 28, when a young NDP MP sat next to him.

They had never met before and he was disconcerted because he wasn’t 100% sure of her name.

The young MP then said she wanted to get something off her chest — the allegations of inappropriate behaviour she was subjected to by a Liberal MP.

She added that there was a second case, involving another NDP MP and a different Liberal member.

I have some sympathy for Mr. Trudeau. Critics accuse him of lacking life experience but the consequences of sexual assault are something he does know about.

Quite why a young NDP MP went to the leader of another party – someone she’d never met – rather than the head of her own party is a mystery. NDP sources said that one staff member was aware of the allegations but Mr. Mulcair was not.

But, having heard the allegations, Mr. Trudeau could not unhear them. He was obliged to take action, which he did by dispatching Liberal whip Judy Foote to a meeting with the two NDP MPs and the party’s whip, Nycole Turmel.

It was Mr. Trudeau’s next step that has upset the New Democrats – and they have grounds for anger.

One of the NDP MPs (not the one who spoke to Mr. Trudeau) was explicit in the meeting with Ms. Foote that she did not want the allegations to go public.

Now the feeling is if one leader found the other hanging from a ledge by his fingertips, he’d stamp on them The incident that sparked the complaint last Christmas was serious enough to force her to take a leave of absence and she was clear she did not want to have to deal with any publicity.

Despite that plea, Mr. Trudeau held a press conference Wednesday saying that Mr. Andrews and Mr. Pacetti had been suspended from caucus for “serious personal misconduct.” Both MPs deny any wrongdoing.

Liberals say Mr. Trudeau did everything he could “to the point of looking ridiculous” not give out any information that could identify the two women. They say Mr. Mulcair is now politicizing the incident. “It’s disgusting,” said one Liberal.

But the NDP are not buying it.

“The Liberal leader just wanted to look good – he was not thinking of the victims,” said one senior New Democrat.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1November 8, 2014 6:45 AM

Why are you posting this NDP propaganda, OP?

Most people are commending Justin Trudeau for his handling of this situation and for taking a strong stand against sexual harassment.

Angry Tom Mulcair is just trying to score political points because he is running 3rd in the polls.

And now the NDP has its own sexual harassment allegations to contend with in the lawsuit that was filed against an NDP MP today.

by Anonymousreply 2November 8, 2014 6:47 AM

OP, shame on you for saying that about a Black man.

by Anonymousreply 3September 2, 2020 8:19 AM

The trolls are on full attack. It started yesterday across all gossip sites and big forums. Mass bombardment of rightwing threads. Start greying out. They are wanting to overwhelm the sites.

by Anonymousreply 4September 2, 2020 8:24 AM

I FF and block all poster with the words “shit” or “shitter” in their OP

by Anonymousreply 5September 2, 2020 8:36 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!