?
yup
by Anonymous | reply 1 | July 14, 2013 7:04 PM |
Yea, that is the one from Stern magazine.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | July 14, 2013 7:09 PM |
Wow, so they captured an outtake when he wasn't "hiding" himself. Awesome. Looks uncut.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | July 14, 2013 7:11 PM |
Huh. I saw the Cosmo? one as a teen, but he was covered.
Why didn't he fluff?
by Anonymous | reply 4 | July 14, 2013 7:12 PM |
Cosmo shot frontals but did not publish, they sold to Stern a German magazine. The frontal is from Stern, I still have an old copy.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | July 14, 2013 7:16 PM |
Looks uncut?
Whattaya blind???
by Anonymous | reply 6 | July 14, 2013 7:59 PM |
Burt Reynolds is uncut, so I'm not sure about that pic. It looks like he might have his foreskin retracted.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | July 14, 2013 8:06 PM |
R4, they didn't do that back then
by Anonymous | reply 8 | July 14, 2013 8:11 PM |
No. That's Bea Arthur.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | July 14, 2013 8:17 PM |
Don't be ridiculous, R9. Bea Arthur's cock was much bigger!
by Anonymous | reply 10 | July 14, 2013 8:19 PM |
Now you know why I divorced him.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | July 14, 2013 8:24 PM |
I think it's a hot picture. I bet not one of you guys is bigger than that when you are soft.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | July 14, 2013 8:35 PM |
He is indeed intact.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | July 14, 2013 11:59 PM |
Half the shaft is covered by that 1970s bush. It's bigger than it looks.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | July 15, 2013 12:06 AM |
Why did he agree to have frontals taken? That's just weird for an actor.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | July 15, 2013 12:10 AM |
That bush is big enough to film the entire backwoods rape scene and still hide both of Burt's dueling banjos.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | July 15, 2013 12:21 AM |
There was just not a better looking man alive in the early and mid Seventies.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | July 15, 2013 12:26 AM |
I'm so glad that dudes trim their pubes now. A big bush like that is nasty and such a turn-off.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | July 15, 2013 12:33 AM |
Speak for yourself, R18.
And yeah, he's intact. His foreskin is indeed retracted.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | July 15, 2013 1:22 AM |
Are we sure that his real?
I read an interview where he madefun of George Maharis and Jim Brown for showing penis. It kind of implied he didn't do that.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | July 15, 2013 1:25 AM |
Well he technically didn't do it, R20. The photos showing his cock were outtakes.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | July 15, 2013 1:38 AM |
I heard frontals were taken, and they were planning on using one of them in Cosmo. Burt was on board with it, but his agent told him a full-frontal would end his career.
I don't see how. Women and we gay men were anxiously waiting for the issue to arrive in the stores. Playgirl began publishing a couple of years later. There were male celebrities who went full-frontal there. Johnny Mathis even posed fully-frontal for a future Playgirl issue. Again, an agent quashed the idea.
Damn agents.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | July 15, 2013 2:28 AM |
Now that is a man's man bush! Sexy.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | July 15, 2013 3:01 AM |
weren't there obsenity laws back then? could Burt have been arrested in certain states for a penis shot?
I'd kind of like to see the Johnny Mathis nude shots. I wonder what his intention was with posing nude...he always had a pretty wholesome image.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | July 15, 2013 3:05 AM |
[quote]I wonder what his intention was with posing nude...
Proud of his 12-inches!!!!!!
by Anonymous | reply 25 | July 15, 2013 3:11 AM |
Well, then, where are the other eleven?
by Anonymous | reply 26 | July 15, 2013 3:35 AM |
Attitudes toward nudity were very different back then. What was this, around 1971?
Burt posed in the nude as a lark, not even thinking there could be a problem....he was immensely flattered to be the first celeb asked.
The only difference in the shot used was his arm posed over his cock, it's not like he was ever clothed down there.
Things have really changed in America.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | July 15, 2013 1:04 PM |
[quote]Things have really changed in America.
Have you checked out the recent cover pictures of Giancarlo Stanton?
by Anonymous | reply 28 | July 15, 2013 2:29 PM |
he's a hottie
by Anonymous | reply 29 | July 15, 2013 2:49 PM |
My neighbor had that poster in her basement laundry room.
Right next to the laundry was a knotty pine bathroom decorated with demonic-looking elves and wooden shoes.
It was my prepubescent hell: find an excuse to drag her fat kids into laundry and then run home to masturbate.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | July 15, 2013 2:52 PM |
What's Burt doing now?
by Anonymous | reply 31 | July 15, 2013 7:17 PM |
Burt is having his pudding in the day room then going to Bingo.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | July 15, 2013 7:18 PM |
Johnny Mathis? That's the first I've heard of that. Are you sure he posed for Playgirl?
by Anonymous | reply 33 | July 15, 2013 7:19 PM |
I wonder if he was musky the day he posed for this pic.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | July 16, 2013 4:21 AM |
Sadly, Dinah Shore was unavailable to fluff him.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | July 16, 2013 5:57 AM |
[quote]Burt posed in the nude as a lark, not even thinking there could be a problem....he was immensely flattered to be the first celeb asked.
Actually, Paul Newman was asked first, but he declined. Then Burt was filling in as guest host for Johnny Carson and the editor-in-chief of Cosmopolitan, Helen Gurley Brown, happened to be a guest and she made him the offer after the show.
BTW: Here's another version of OP's picture.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | July 16, 2013 6:25 AM |
Why is the only image yellowed and ripped as if photocopied from a mangled magazine clipping?
I remember seeing a two sided poster of the famous image at a head shop chain in the early '70 that had the same pose but from the back on the alternate side. I've never come across another despite years of searching on eBay. It was the first adult butt I'd ever seen and I was transfixed by its hairiness.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | July 16, 2013 10:31 AM |
How did they get his peen to lay perfectly straight without having a full chubby to prop it up? And.. that IS a real pube fest he has going on there!
by Anonymous | reply 38 | July 16, 2013 10:44 AM |
Pat Dallas, a Playgirl photographer, described the shoot with Johnny Mathis in detail in her book "Dallas in Wonderland." He was definitely into the session at his backyard pool. According to Dallas, he was split-leg naked before she was ready to shoot. Later, he had second thoughts... Peter Lupus was not willing to go full-frontal when Dallas took the initial photos. His wife insisted on it; otherwise the peen shots wouldn't have been taken. Dallas had sex with some of the centerfold models. The book was published in 1978 and has many photos of the models which weren't printed in Playgirl. It's an interesting read. I had to look hard, but I found a copy on e-Bay several years ago.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | July 17, 2013 6:05 AM |
Love those pubes.
VERY HOT...sorry shaved boys you are not real men.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | January 15, 2014 12:37 PM |
Beautiful man. Perfect.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | January 15, 2014 12:43 PM |
[quote]Why didn't he fluff?
Honey, he DID fluff. That's IT.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | January 15, 2014 12:43 PM |
He's so small it must be real.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | January 15, 2014 4:01 PM |
His ass was very hairy too!
by Anonymous | reply 44 | January 15, 2014 4:12 PM |
He was hot, hot, hot. Except I always thought that he had really ugly ears.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | January 15, 2014 6:23 PM |
*giggles
Is that his cock?
by Anonymous | reply 46 | January 15, 2014 6:33 PM |
His left leg looks awful photoshop weird.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | January 15, 2014 6:38 PM |
very hot who else is uncut and famous?
by Anonymous | reply 48 | March 24, 2016 8:49 PM |
Wouldn't touch the walls.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | March 24, 2016 9:01 PM |
Yeah, about as tiny as his brain.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | March 24, 2016 9:07 PM |
sexy
by Anonymous | reply 51 | March 24, 2016 9:13 PM |
Yes it's real it was from a German magazine. I guess it was cold in the room, or he is a grower?
by Anonymous | reply 52 | March 25, 2016 10:28 PM |
R52 = doesn't know cocks get bigger when erect.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | March 26, 2016 1:43 AM |
Burt can only dream of having Maharis' nice cock.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | March 26, 2016 1:57 AM |
He was clearly a Big Bush Supporter.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | March 26, 2016 2:09 AM |
1970's = hairy holes for everyone!!!!!
by Anonymous | reply 56 | March 26, 2016 2:10 AM |
Good thread.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | March 26, 2016 2:16 AM |
Actually this is a common error -- that's Ernie.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | March 26, 2016 3:16 AM |
Of course I know that R53. He recently admitted in an interview that he was drunk when this picture was taken, and that he regrets it.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | March 26, 2016 3:30 AM |
Merle Oberon
by Anonymous | reply 60 | March 26, 2016 3:42 AM |
Yes that's him, and he's not cut.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | March 5, 2018 10:41 AM |
Big Bush is so hot why did guys start trimming?
by Anonymous | reply 62 | March 5, 2018 10:57 AM |