Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Is this really a frontal of Burt

?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 62March 5, 2018 10:57 AM

yup

by Anonymousreply 1July 14, 2013 7:04 PM

Yea, that is the one from Stern magazine.

by Anonymousreply 2July 14, 2013 7:09 PM

Wow, so they captured an outtake when he wasn't "hiding" himself. Awesome. Looks uncut.

by Anonymousreply 3July 14, 2013 7:11 PM

Huh. I saw the Cosmo? one as a teen, but he was covered.

Why didn't he fluff?

by Anonymousreply 4July 14, 2013 7:12 PM

Cosmo shot frontals but did not publish, they sold to Stern a German magazine. The frontal is from Stern, I still have an old copy.

by Anonymousreply 5July 14, 2013 7:16 PM

Looks uncut?

Whattaya blind???

by Anonymousreply 6July 14, 2013 7:59 PM

Burt Reynolds is uncut, so I'm not sure about that pic. It looks like he might have his foreskin retracted.

by Anonymousreply 7July 14, 2013 8:06 PM

R4, they didn't do that back then

by Anonymousreply 8July 14, 2013 8:11 PM

No. That's Bea Arthur.

by Anonymousreply 9July 14, 2013 8:17 PM

Don't be ridiculous, R9. Bea Arthur's cock was much bigger!

by Anonymousreply 10July 14, 2013 8:19 PM

Now you know why I divorced him.

by Anonymousreply 11July 14, 2013 8:24 PM

I think it's a hot picture. I bet not one of you guys is bigger than that when you are soft.

by Anonymousreply 12July 14, 2013 8:35 PM

He is indeed intact.

by Anonymousreply 13July 14, 2013 11:59 PM

Half the shaft is covered by that 1970s bush. It's bigger than it looks.

by Anonymousreply 14July 15, 2013 12:06 AM

Why did he agree to have frontals taken? That's just weird for an actor.

by Anonymousreply 15July 15, 2013 12:10 AM

That bush is big enough to film the entire backwoods rape scene and still hide both of Burt's dueling banjos.

by Anonymousreply 16July 15, 2013 12:21 AM

There was just not a better looking man alive in the early and mid Seventies.

by Anonymousreply 17July 15, 2013 12:26 AM

I'm so glad that dudes trim their pubes now. A big bush like that is nasty and such a turn-off.

by Anonymousreply 18July 15, 2013 12:33 AM

Speak for yourself, R18.

And yeah, he's intact. His foreskin is indeed retracted.

by Anonymousreply 19July 15, 2013 1:22 AM

Are we sure that his real?

I read an interview where he madefun of George Maharis and Jim Brown for showing penis. It kind of implied he didn't do that.

by Anonymousreply 20July 15, 2013 1:25 AM

Well he technically didn't do it, R20. The photos showing his cock were outtakes.

by Anonymousreply 21July 15, 2013 1:38 AM

I heard frontals were taken, and they were planning on using one of them in Cosmo. Burt was on board with it, but his agent told him a full-frontal would end his career.

I don't see how. Women and we gay men were anxiously waiting for the issue to arrive in the stores. Playgirl began publishing a couple of years later. There were male celebrities who went full-frontal there. Johnny Mathis even posed fully-frontal for a future Playgirl issue. Again, an agent quashed the idea.

Damn agents.

by Anonymousreply 22July 15, 2013 2:28 AM

Now that is a man's man bush! Sexy.

by Anonymousreply 23July 15, 2013 3:01 AM

weren't there obsenity laws back then? could Burt have been arrested in certain states for a penis shot?

I'd kind of like to see the Johnny Mathis nude shots. I wonder what his intention was with posing nude...he always had a pretty wholesome image.

by Anonymousreply 24July 15, 2013 3:05 AM

[quote]I wonder what his intention was with posing nude...

Proud of his 12-inches!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 25July 15, 2013 3:11 AM

Well, then, where are the other eleven?

by Anonymousreply 26July 15, 2013 3:35 AM

Attitudes toward nudity were very different back then. What was this, around 1971?

Burt posed in the nude as a lark, not even thinking there could be a problem....he was immensely flattered to be the first celeb asked.

The only difference in the shot used was his arm posed over his cock, it's not like he was ever clothed down there.

Things have really changed in America.

by Anonymousreply 27July 15, 2013 1:04 PM

[quote]Things have really changed in America.

Have you checked out the recent cover pictures of Giancarlo Stanton?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28July 15, 2013 2:29 PM

he's a hottie

by Anonymousreply 29July 15, 2013 2:49 PM

My neighbor had that poster in her basement laundry room.

Right next to the laundry was a knotty pine bathroom decorated with demonic-looking elves and wooden shoes.

It was my prepubescent hell: find an excuse to drag her fat kids into laundry and then run home to masturbate.

by Anonymousreply 30July 15, 2013 2:52 PM

What's Burt doing now?

by Anonymousreply 31July 15, 2013 7:17 PM

Burt is having his pudding in the day room then going to Bingo.

by Anonymousreply 32July 15, 2013 7:18 PM

Johnny Mathis? That's the first I've heard of that. Are you sure he posed for Playgirl?

by Anonymousreply 33July 15, 2013 7:19 PM

I wonder if he was musky the day he posed for this pic.

by Anonymousreply 34July 16, 2013 4:21 AM

Sadly, Dinah Shore was unavailable to fluff him.

by Anonymousreply 35July 16, 2013 5:57 AM

[quote]Burt posed in the nude as a lark, not even thinking there could be a problem....he was immensely flattered to be the first celeb asked.

Actually, Paul Newman was asked first, but he declined. Then Burt was filling in as guest host for Johnny Carson and the editor-in-chief of Cosmopolitan, Helen Gurley Brown, happened to be a guest and she made him the offer after the show.

BTW: Here's another version of OP's picture.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 36July 16, 2013 6:25 AM

Why is the only image yellowed and ripped as if photocopied from a mangled magazine clipping?

I remember seeing a two sided poster of the famous image at a head shop chain in the early '70 that had the same pose but from the back on the alternate side. I've never come across another despite years of searching on eBay. It was the first adult butt I'd ever seen and I was transfixed by its hairiness.

by Anonymousreply 37July 16, 2013 10:31 AM

How did they get his peen to lay perfectly straight without having a full chubby to prop it up? And.. that IS a real pube fest he has going on there!

by Anonymousreply 38July 16, 2013 10:44 AM

Pat Dallas, a Playgirl photographer, described the shoot with Johnny Mathis in detail in her book "Dallas in Wonderland." He was definitely into the session at his backyard pool. According to Dallas, he was split-leg naked before she was ready to shoot. Later, he had second thoughts... Peter Lupus was not willing to go full-frontal when Dallas took the initial photos. His wife insisted on it; otherwise the peen shots wouldn't have been taken. Dallas had sex with some of the centerfold models. The book was published in 1978 and has many photos of the models which weren't printed in Playgirl. It's an interesting read. I had to look hard, but I found a copy on e-Bay several years ago.

by Anonymousreply 39July 17, 2013 6:05 AM

Love those pubes.

VERY HOT...sorry shaved boys you are not real men.

by Anonymousreply 40January 15, 2014 12:37 PM

Beautiful man. Perfect.

by Anonymousreply 41January 15, 2014 12:43 PM

[quote]Why didn't he fluff?

Honey, he DID fluff. That's IT.

by Anonymousreply 42January 15, 2014 12:43 PM

He's so small it must be real.

by Anonymousreply 43January 15, 2014 4:01 PM

His ass was very hairy too!

by Anonymousreply 44January 15, 2014 4:12 PM

He was hot, hot, hot. Except I always thought that he had really ugly ears.

by Anonymousreply 45January 15, 2014 6:23 PM

*giggles

Is that his cock?

by Anonymousreply 46January 15, 2014 6:33 PM

His left leg looks awful photoshop weird.

by Anonymousreply 47January 15, 2014 6:38 PM

very hot who else is uncut and famous?

by Anonymousreply 48March 24, 2016 8:49 PM

Wouldn't touch the walls.

by Anonymousreply 49March 24, 2016 9:01 PM

Yeah, about as tiny as his brain.

by Anonymousreply 50March 24, 2016 9:07 PM

sexy

by Anonymousreply 51March 24, 2016 9:13 PM

Yes it's real it was from a German magazine. I guess it was cold in the room, or he is a grower?

by Anonymousreply 52March 25, 2016 10:28 PM

R52 = doesn't know cocks get bigger when erect.

by Anonymousreply 53March 26, 2016 1:43 AM

Burt can only dream of having Maharis' nice cock.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 54March 26, 2016 1:57 AM

He was clearly a Big Bush Supporter.

by Anonymousreply 55March 26, 2016 2:09 AM

1970's = hairy holes for everyone!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 56March 26, 2016 2:10 AM

Good thread.

by Anonymousreply 57March 26, 2016 2:16 AM

Actually this is a common error -- that's Ernie.

by Anonymousreply 58March 26, 2016 3:16 AM

Of course I know that R53. He recently admitted in an interview that he was drunk when this picture was taken, and that he regrets it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 59March 26, 2016 3:30 AM

Merle Oberon

by Anonymousreply 60March 26, 2016 3:42 AM

Yes that's him, and he's not cut.

by Anonymousreply 61March 5, 2018 10:41 AM

Big Bush is so hot why did guys start trimming?

by Anonymousreply 62March 5, 2018 10:57 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!