Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Christina Hendricks: 'Calling me full-figured is just rude'

For better or for worse, most of the profiles we’ve read on "Mad Men" star Christina Hendricks, 37, throw in a mention or two of her enviably curvaceous figure.


by Anonymousreply 48305/11/2015

Would she prefer "fat fuck?"

by Anonymousreply 110/05/2012

She really is an idiot. She's confusing Full Figure with Plus Size. She bought the tits and thrusts them out every where she goes and when someone comments on her figure, she's gets upset.

by Anonymousreply 210/05/2012

As opposed to "fat"?

by Anonymousreply 310/05/2012

How about curvy with major breast implants?

by Anonymousreply 410/05/2012

Later she changed her mind and remarked, "You can call me anything as long as you don't call me late for dinner."

by Anonymousreply 510/05/2012

She passed full figure this season and is now downright obese.

by Anonymousreply 610/05/2012

And then they showed the entire interview even with the gaffes. How come?

by Anonymousreply 710/05/2012

Isn't she girdled to hell and back in the show?

by Anonymousreply 810/05/2012

Christina says she wears her glasses all the time even to award shows. No, Christina, you don't.

Your tits are front and center sans any glasses, you full-figured mama.

by Anonymousreply 910/05/2012

Full-figured is not an insult -- it's just a description. I mean, they called Jane Russell "full-figured" in this Playtex bra commercial.

by Anonymousreply 1010/05/2012

Fine, you're a cow.

by Anonymousreply 1110/05/2012

She has such a beautiful face. Those fake tits are huge!

by Anonymousreply 1210/05/2012

And Christina, of course you always try so hard to hide your full figure.

Wherever on earth did anyone ever get the idea that your extraordinary bazzooms might cause anyone to think of you as full-figured?

by Anonymousreply 1310/05/2012

[quote]She passed full figure this season and is now downright obese.

No she isn't. You don't even know what actual obese looks like, do you, Karen Carpenter?

by Anonymousreply 1410/05/2012

She's a fat cunt.

by Anonymousreply 1510/05/2012

She's just Kathy Bates without the cancer.

by Anonymousreply 1610/05/2012

DL, Would you call Marilyn Monroe "full-figured?" There's a difference between "curvy" and fat. Of course in Hollywood a naturally busty women with toned hips and a size 10 might be considered all of the above.

by Anonymousreply 1710/05/2012

"Full figured" is not an insult, but of course it's never polite to comment too much on anyone's body, even in a flattering way. I'm sure she's sick to death of talk about her bod, and all the veiled allusions to her poundage.

And yes, she is corseted to hell and back on "Mad Men", women in those days wore girdles, cinch belts, and bullet bras. It's a great look for her, much better than anything she's ever work in real life.

by Anonymousreply 1810/05/2012

She is full figured. Christina is plumper than Marilyn was. I think she carries weight well, but would look better if she lost about 10-15 lbs (like she was earlier in Mad Men).

by Anonymousreply 1910/06/2012

She probably IS clinically obese. You'd be surprised at what physicians consider obese.

by Anonymousreply 2010/06/2012

Christina is about 5'7". Clinical obesity (BMI above 30) starts at about 190 at that height. Christina is NOT 190. She might be 170 at most, and probably 160.

by Anonymousreply 2110/06/2012

Honestly, I think she is fat. Full-figured is a compliment.

by Anonymousreply 2210/06/2012

No, Christina, they're merely being diplomatic and polite.

Plus there's no such term as "fat-figured."

by Anonymousreply 2310/06/2012

It is rude to call her full-figured since she's clearly "rubenesque"

by Anonymousreply 2410/06/2012

Marilyn Monroe was much thinner. She would have been called 'curvy' or hourglass. Hendricks is full figured b/c while she's curvy, she's way heavier than most curvy celebs of the past. She's a big girl. Nothing wrong with that.

by Anonymousreply 2510/06/2012

R24 - actually the figures in the paintings Rubens painted were very full on bottom, but not so big in the boobs.

by Anonymousreply 2610/06/2012

And her ass is still flat as the Midwestern Plains.

And just as wide.

by Anonymousreply 2710/06/2012

How rude?

by Anonymousreply 2810/06/2012

She should totally play Ginger Grant in the Gilligan's Island movie.

by Anonymousreply 2910/06/2012

Her proportions are so odd. From the tits down she's really fat (just look at her midsection and thighs when she's not wearing clothes that hide it or girdle it in), but her arms and face are skinny. She has a pretty face, though.

by Anonymousreply 3010/06/2012

She's got a bit of a belly, but not much. I like her proportions, though she could lose a little.

by Anonymousreply 3110/06/2012

Full-figured = Big tits, matching hips and a small waist.

For some reason, men seem to like this look.

by Anonymousreply 3210/06/2012

R32, I thought that that was just curvy. So what was Marilyn Monroe? What size dress does Hendricks wear, without a girdle. Size 10 is now average for ladies, although not for actresses.

by Anonymousreply 3310/06/2012

I'd guess Christina is a 12 now. MM at her absolute heaviest was a 6-8 in today's sizes.

by Anonymousreply 3410/06/2012

She does have a flat ass and small arms.

How weird.

by Anonymousreply 3510/06/2012

Exactly. Marilyn was never bigger than a six 8 of today. Marilyn was a C cup and at her heaviest 140 pounds.

Even with vanity sizing, Hendricks is at least a size 12. She's at minimum 40 inches on top and a 40 in hip area. Her waist isn't Marilyn's 22 inches either, she's more like 29 inch waist with heavy corseting/girdle.

by Anonymousreply 3610/06/2012

They pad her for Mad Men.

In real life she is probably full figured but the cameras make her look a little chubby.

by Anonymousreply 3710/06/2012

R36, I think MM was a solid D at her heaviest. MM also had an odd midsection, very thin waist, but she almost always had a belly pooch. Marilyn also had comparatively plumper arms. Marilyn's figure is probably closest to Scar Jo's today - though Scarlett doesn't have as defined of a waist.

by Anonymousreply 3810/06/2012

Someone is in denial. They girdle Christina up to the gills in Mad Men. In real life her waist is huge without the girdle/spanx cinching her in. Lucky for her in Mad Men it's expected that a woman would be wearing girdles and bullet bras to show off the curves.

by Anonymousreply 3910/06/2012

She looks like the pretty girl from the trailer park, in the face. In a non northern state.

by Anonymousreply 4010/06/2012

Yes, she is heavy. Luckily, it suits her...but she IS heavy.

by Anonymousreply 4110/06/2012

Even without the girdle, Christina's waist isn't huge. Actually, R40, I think Christina looks like the hot waitress at a southern diner.

by Anonymousreply 4210/06/2012

She also resembles those sex workers in the documentaries of the legal brothels, like C ranch. Same type.

by Anonymousreply 4310/06/2012

Christina, give us a week and well take off the weight! You'll have your own ad campaign too.

by Anonymousreply 4410/06/2012

She looked good in the leaked cell phone pics

by Anonymousreply 4510/06/2012

She looked great, too bad about the dead ugly husband.

by Anonymousreply 4610/06/2012

R32, So if most men prefer the curvy look, why are most actresses the opposite?

by Anonymousreply 4710/06/2012

R47: Good question.

by Anonymousreply 4810/06/2012

It is rude, she's not some old lady who is full-figured. The bitch is "Thick"!

by Anonymousreply 4910/06/2012

Christina is downright skinny compared to a lot of American women today.

by Anonymousreply 5010/06/2012

She looks a hella lot hotter in r45's pix.


by Anonymousreply 5110/06/2012

Yeah -- and I'm sure you boys all look like fucking Adonis.

by Anonymousreply 5210/06/2012

Don't call me tiny!

by Anonymousreply 5310/06/2012

Don't call me African-American!

by Anonymousreply 5410/06/2012

Don't call me butch!

by Anonymousreply 5510/06/2012

Her boobs look real.

by Anonymousreply 5610/06/2012

Her boobs are obviously fake. You can see the outline of the capsules in some pictures. And there are old photos of her in playboy that are obviously pre-augmentation.

by Anonymousreply 5710/06/2012

She's about the same size as Nigella Lawson at her heaviest.

by Anonymousreply 5810/06/2012

R32, because the camera puts on 10 pounds, and because America is conditioned to pick apart the weight of females in the media.

Most men settle for rotund because they can't attract what they see on TV or well-made porn. They say they don't want skinny women, but what they mean is they don't want Twiggy or the early Kate Moss. They do not look for plump women, but if that's the best bet, they're ok with it.

Plump is ok if they bring a lot of value, especially if they love sex and aren't lazy

by Anonymousreply 5910/07/2012

A few decades ago, there were more sexpot TV actresses who were pushing chubby: Adrienne Barbeau on Maude, Marilu Henner on Taxi, Loretta Swit on MASH (early years), etc.

by Anonymousreply 6110/07/2012

She's a fat fuck

by Anonymousreply 6210/07/2012

My acting teacher thinks she is a one-note actress. He says she tries to be sexy in every scene she is in instead of connecting with the other performers. No subtlety in her performance at all.

by Anonymousreply 6310/07/2012

I love her on Mad Men but her film career, despite several film roles, is going absolutely nowhere.

by Anonymousreply 6410/07/2012

R63 - your film teacher has not watched enough Mad Men. Yes, often, she plays up the sexiness, but she has made Joan into a very complex character.

R64 - So what? Joan has become an iconic character on an iconic TV show.

by Anonymousreply 6510/07/2012

Is it the dress, or has Christina put on more weight?

by Anonymousreply 6610/21/2012

I'm 5'4" and if I weighed even 135lbs, I'd consider myself pretty fat. Good for her but I don't think I could let myself get that large.

It is really bizarre, as others have mentioned, that she has a thin face and arms.

by Anonymousreply 6710/21/2012

R67, I'm 5'3" and start feeling chubby around 130 (where I am now).

by Anonymousreply 6810/21/2012

I'm 5'3" and you don't WANT to know what I weigh. I go up and down. But I think Christina Hendricks has to "own" that she's an actress, and it's a pretty visual medium, especially film and TV. I read online somewhere that she finds it frustrating, to be a size 14, when it's time for costume fittings.

As well, she might: most actresses, for good or bad, these days are size 0, 2, 4, 6; an 8 is considered bordeline chunky (not be me: but an not an actress.)

There are people who have had breast reduction. Not saying she should, but I've read about plenty of people, NOT in showbiz, that have.

TO the question within: I would pleasantly but vehemently DISAGREE that calling her full-figured is just rude. Uh, NO, dear: it just shows that people have, you know: EYEsight??!!

by Anonymousreply 6910/21/2012

She needs to pay more attention to what she's wearing.

by Anonymousreply 7010/21/2012

she has a bm once a week

by Anonymousreply 7110/21/2012

Huh? R71

by Anonymousreply 7210/22/2012

New pics, even fuller.

by Anonymousreply 7310/27/2012

At the season 6 premiere, even heavier

by Anonymousreply 7403/21/2013

When Mad Men is over no one will talk about her at all. She needs to shut up and tighten that girdle.

by Anonymousreply 7503/21/2013

LOL r5

She is full figured, so what's her fucking problem.

by Anonymousreply 7603/22/2013

She looks fantastic on the show,but in real life she rarely wears clothes that suit her.

I don't find her a one note actress at all.

by Anonymousreply 7703/22/2013

I've only seen her in Firefly and Mad Nen, but she was great in both.

by Anonymousreply 7803/22/2013

Big difference between full figured, a bit overweight, and fat. All depends on how PC you're being

by Anonymousreply 7903/22/2013

Boo hoo, fatty. You make a shitload of money and are on a hit show, tough shit if you get "offended" when people talk about your gross body that is always on display. If it were me I would ask if you were in your 5th trimester with that gut. Oh and nice cankles.

by Anonymousreply 8003/22/2013

If by 'full' they mean 'full of pie and ice cream' then it fits.

by Anonymousreply 8103/22/2013

My god, she is big.

by Anonymousreply 8303/22/2013

Isn't she the actress who has bm's the size of squirrels?

by Anonymousreply 8403/22/2013

She really is a big woman, to call her "full-figured" is a compliment as she's clearly overweight.

by Anonymousreply 8503/22/2013

She is gorgeous and a decent actress. I guess she is a bit sensitive about how she is presented in the media. Every single article mentions her figure. I guess that must get tedious. As though that's all she is about. Her Joan is great in a show where there are few characters to care about. Most of them are horrible. Love thd show though.

by Anonymousreply 8603/22/2013

Her face isn't beautiful, she's a "jolie ladie" at best. She's wants the media to talk about her "full-figure" constantly, probably because she doesn't want to give up pie.

by Anonymousreply 8703/22/2013

Her face on its own would never garner any attention because she's pretty/average at best. She's one of those girls who think they're better than they are because their breasts get them attention. Your chest is turning heads, dear, not your face.

by Anonymousreply 8803/22/2013

I think she's gorgeous but do admit she is thick by Hollywood standards. Still, I like that she isn't a lollipop headed anorexic like everyone else.

by Anonymousreply 8903/22/2013

[quote]Her face on its own would never garner any attention because she's pretty/average at best. She's one of those girls who think they're better than they are because their breasts get them attention. Your chest is turning heads, dear, not your face.

Yes! If people stopped looking at her image and judged solely by her facial features. They'd see she's quite plain.

[quote]Still, I like that she isn't a lollipop headed anorexic like everyone else.

Most respected Hollywood actresses are a healthy weight. Hendricks is overweight.

And her fake breasts aren't fooling anyone.

by Anonymousreply 9003/22/2013

Many Hollywood actresses are too skinny: Angelina Jolie, Keira Knightly.

If CH's face is not at least pretty then I'd like to know who is pretty/beautiful.

It's not just about her lovely breasts. I like to think they're real bye. Most women would not go for breast implants that big. Plastic surgeons might even advise against that size, given the strain it can put on your back.

by Anonymousreply 9103/22/2013

[quote]Many Hollywood actresses are too skinny: Angelina Jolie, Keira Knightly.

Jolie is too thin. I don't know if Knightley is naturally thin or not, but she is quite slim.

However most fraus don't like to admit that most A-List actresses in Hollywood are a perfectly healthy weight (slim yes, but not malnourished). They also like to delude themselves into thinking Hendricks "curvy" body is the type men find attractive.

[quote]If CH's face is not at least pretty then I'd like to know who is pretty/beautiful.

Grace Kelly.

[quote]It's not just about her lovely breasts. I like to think they're real bye. Most women would not go for breast implants that big. Plastic surgeons might even advise against that size, given the strain it can put on your back.

She was totally flat-chested before. She's gotten implants in addition to gaining weight.

Facially, I don't think she's attractive at all. Although it is nice to see an actress in Hollywood embrace her pale skin.

by Anonymousreply 9203/22/2013

It's not a "perfectly healthy weight" if you have to do drugs and/or develop an eating disorder to maintain it.

by Anonymousreply 9303/22/2013

First World problem.

by Anonymousreply 9403/22/2013

[quote]It's not a "perfectly healthy weight" if you have to do drugs and/or develop an eating disorder to maintain it.

Most don't have eating disorders or take drugs. They just diet.

by Anonymousreply 9503/22/2013

She's gorgeous.

Plus, what R94 said.

by Anonymousreply 9603/22/2013

She is bovine.

by Anonymousreply 9703/22/2013

R81, she's a FAT FUCK.

by Anonymousreply 9803/22/2013

R91 - Most Hollywood actresses are too thin, but Christina has had too much lunch. She does have gorgeous skin.

by Anonymousreply 9903/22/2013

Most Americans today have a distorted view of what is a healthy body size. Hendricks is overweight, look at her thighs in R81's link

Sort of like how their taste-buds are distorted and have become accustomed to food the is unnaturally sweet.

by Anonymousreply 10003/22/2013

Whoa r100. Those pics are not good, she is huge and she has ham hock arms too.

by Anonymousreply 10103/22/2013

Whilst at my link at R99, I saw Mariah Carey far slimmer than Hendricks.

by Anonymousreply 10203/22/2013

She looks better in R100 link.

by Anonymousreply 10303/22/2013

R92, where are the photos it her flat chested? If she really was flat chested and went for this size then she really is dumb and her plastic surgeon totally irresponsible.

Admittedly I've really only seen her in Mad men where she is usually well covered and wearing a lot of underwear.

Straight men really do like big breasts though it isn't usually a deal breaker. Women like CH and Nigella Lawson really are considered gorgeous. It isn't just some media myth. They could both maybe lose a kilo or two for health reasons but have such pretty faces and nicely curvy bodies this doesn't detract. Is every overweight/obese woman considered attractive therefore? Of course not.

R92 you've selected possibly the most beautiful Hollywood actress ever to argue your case - Grace Kelly. CH isn't as beautiful but then who is?

by Anonymousreply 10403/22/2013

here she is before and after. She had tits, just not huge ones.

by Anonymousreply 10503/22/2013

Wow r105 she was kind of cute before, had a little Lauren Holly thing going on. Now she's gross. Did she just get big tits so she could excuse getting obese? Like how Jessica Simpson got pregnant again to get off her crappy weight watchers diet.

by Anonymousreply 10603/22/2013

She's nowhere near obese for fucks sake. Dramaqueens.

She is quite a lot heavier than when she was young though, so of course her boobs would be bigger. Boobs are just fat. That dress in the after pic is just gross, I don't think her tits look that insane normally. Just saying. She could have easily have a boob job too.

by Anonymousreply 10703/22/2013

sorry but that pic at r81 is an obese woman. This is her without girdles.

by Anonymousreply 10803/22/2013

I bet her uncorralled boobs hit the top of her feet.

by Anonymousreply 10903/22/2013

[quote]R92 you've selected possibly the most beautiful Hollywood actress ever to argue your case - Grace Kelly. CH isn't as beautiful but then who is?

Yes, that was unfair. Beauty's in the eye of the beholder but I just don't think the woman's face in R105's link is pretty in fact at times she can look downright homely.

A good way to judge someone's looks is to imagine them without makeup and bald. Somehow I think people are judging Hendricks looks on her overall image and that fact the the media and other people keep saying she's beautiful.

I'm not sure what it is, maybe it's the manly chin. Here's a photo below, admittedly not the best angle but it shows her without that pouty pose she seems to be pulling in every other picture:

by Anonymousreply 11103/22/2013

I'm just not seeing the supposed beauty everyone keeps talking about.

This one's fairer, head on angle:

by Anonymousreply 11203/22/2013

She had a nice voluptuous shape the first season of Mad Men. But she's gained about five pounds each season.

by Anonymousreply 11303/22/2013

Ugh r11, she's got those little baked bean teeth. Like George and Jerry's coach in high school

by Anonymousreply 11403/22/2013

Sorry I meant r111

by Anonymousreply 11503/22/2013

She was so beautiful and lithe as "Saffron" in those Firefly episodes (although that was 10 years ago.).

by Anonymousreply 11603/22/2013

How did she gain such a massive amount of weight? She seems to have put on about fifty pounds, what did her agent think? Wasn't she worried for her career. She is very big for an actress.

by Anonymousreply 11703/22/2013

The weight gain has been gradual.

by Anonymousreply 11803/22/2013

R111 & R112 is my online doppelganger. I concur.

When she's not contorting her visage in that pose by splaying her lips and lifting the cheeks, she's plain as dog shit in the face. She has that southern trailer park demeanor and features, Think Reba McIntyre. The Judd mother.

If we're talking gorgeous heavy weights then Delta Burke would fit the bill. Now that is some face. She's a beauty on any level. Not this fly by night Tits McGee and her makeup job.

by Anonymousreply 11903/22/2013

You're doppelganger here, R119 and I also agree with you on Delta Burke, she had beautiful cat-like eyes.

by Anonymousreply 12003/22/2013

My link failed. Imagine beautiful eyes.

by Anonymousreply 12103/22/2013

Doppel, your link doesn't work

by Anonymousreply 12203/22/2013

I'll look in the mirror -and see you.

by Anonymousreply 12303/22/2013

Look at this link... if it works...

by Anonymousreply 12403/23/2013


by Anonymousreply 12503/23/2013

Delta was gorgeous.

by Anonymousreply 12603/23/2013

124, dare I say Delta is even more beautiful than Vivien Lee in Gone With The Wind? Her eye shape is catlike, almondesque.

by Anonymousreply 12703/23/2013

Holy Hell!! A plastic surgery dizasstur! Now that's a sin.

by Anonymousreply 12803/23/2013

I think she looks lovely r128

by Anonymousreply 12903/23/2013

Cheek implants aren't for everyone. Especially one whose weight fluctuates. She looks more akin to Roseanne before her botched surgery. RoRo had her cat shaped eyes erased or were they just squinty? Don't remember.

by Anonymousreply 13003/23/2013

Delta would've been perfect as Elizabeth Taylor in a biopic in the early eighties.

Delta has Type II diabetes, which might explain her face's puffiness in recent years.

When Delta gained weight during "Designing Women" the media were quite nasty. Yet Christina is being applauded for her "curvy" figure.

by Anonymousreply 13103/23/2013

You're absolutely right r131. I remember they even had that (very special) episode where she overheard people calling her fat from a bathroom stall or something, to address that she did know she was getting shit about her weight. I don't remember her being half as big and she was a great actress. That's weird and I am glad you brought it up because you would think it would be less acceptable now but I guess not.

by Anonymousreply 13203/23/2013

I disagree but I'd certainly like to hear from Miss Hendricks why she thinks it's rude.

In any event, I love her.

by Anonymousreply 13303/23/2013

If I were Christina, I would find being called full-figured tedious and boring from hearing it constantly. Being an accomplished person - and she is - and constantly being linked to a physical attribute is always demoralizing, no matter what that physical attribute is. But I would like to think I'd have the presence of mind to not confuse the annoyance with with rudeness. She is full-figured. And proof there is nothing wrong with it.

by Anonymousreply 13403/23/2013

[quote]If I were Christina, I would find being called full-figured tedious and boring from hearing it constantly. Being an accomplished person - and she is - and constantly being linked to a physical attribute is always demoralizing, no matter what that physical attribute is. But I would like to think I'd have the presence of mind to not confuse the annoyance with with rudeness. She is full-figured. And proof there is nothing wrong with it.

She encourages it. Full figured is the politest way to describe her, she's overweight.

by Anonymousreply 13503/23/2013

There's no way around it. Full figured doesn't really cut it for this doll. Grotesque is the only word.

by Anonymousreply 13603/23/2013

Wow. r129's link is TRAGIC.

by Anonymousreply 13703/23/2013

Hendricks has a plain face. I always roll my eyes when people say she's beautiful.

by Anonymousreply 13803/23/2013

She also looks much better as Joan than as Christina.

by Anonymousreply 13903/23/2013

She may look better as Joan but her shelf precedes her into every scene. Not a pretty sight, and I would think she has trouble walking almost anywhere.

by Anonymousreply 14003/23/2013

She looks better here.

by Anonymousreply 14103/29/2013

Better than what? Puh leese.

by Anonymousreply 14203/29/2013

Better than in some recent pics.

by Anonymousreply 14303/31/2013

She looked even bigger on the new Mad Men episode.

by Anonymousreply 14404/11/2013

I always thought full-figured was a polite way of saying fat. She is certainly not fat. That being said, I always referred to her as the lady from Capital Knockers City. Is that better?

by Anonymousreply 14504/11/2013

She's not quite fat, but she is pushing fat. She is now past voluptuous.

by Anonymousreply 14604/11/2013

I'm a straight chick and I found myself getting turned on my R[45] pic post.

by Anonymousreply 14704/11/2013

Can anyone take her seriously either as an actress or as tits on wheels?

by Anonymousreply 14804/11/2013

She'll miss being called full figured when they're labelling her WEHT?

by Anonymousreply 14904/11/2013

LOL for R147 I'm a gay dude and I too found myself turned on by that pic.

by Anonymousreply 15004/11/2013

She has huge fake implants like Dolly Parton and she's fat. What does she expect?

by Anonymousreply 15104/11/2013

Filming the Ryan Gosling movie

by Anonymousreply 15205/09/2013

She's pretty and a good actress, but I hate the character of Joan. She's cuntier than Betty truth be told.

by Anonymousreply 15305/09/2013

Joan is sharp tongued, but she's not whiny like Betty. She's also managed to make something of herself.

by Anonymousreply 15405/09/2013

It's a good thing Christina's got the Joan role going for her. It's the best she's gonna get, I'm afraid. If only she wasn't so grotesque. Her talent isn't full-figured at all.

by Anonymousreply 15505/10/2013

She must have the world's best publicist:

by Anonymousreply 15605/10/2013

She has an unusual body. Her face and her limbs are a lot slimmer than her torso.

by Anonymousreply 15705/11/2013

ok, is lard ass acceptable?

And those boobs are just ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 15805/11/2013

Just Damn, r81.

by Anonymousreply 15905/11/2013

Her face is so beautiful. How does she not get carb face or double chins?

by Anonymousreply 16005/11/2013


by Anonymousreply 16105/11/2013

How much more weight must she gain before the media start calling her fat?:

by Anonymousreply 16205/11/2013

Don't bother. She's there.

by Anonymousreply 16305/11/2013

Actually, I think it's a real disservice to the nation's health to call fat women "full-figured" or "curvy" -- they're fat, maybe even obese, and if they don't have Type 2 diabetes, joint pain and heart disease, they will.

by Anonymousreply 16405/11/2013

She's definitively chubby.

by Anonymousreply 16505/11/2013

She's built like Tyler Perry's Medea

by Anonymousreply 16605/11/2013

[quote]Don't bother. She's there.

Of course she's there, but the media are still being complimentary to her, whilst suggesting that women half her size [italic]are[/italic] fat.

by Anonymousreply 16705/15/2013

The media should stop obsessing over women's looks. It's perverted and pathological the way women are constantly being scrutinized. Of course, it's a savvy tool to powertrip women but I am bored with the fucking nagging in regards to women's appearance.

by Anonymousreply 16805/15/2013

[quote]The media should stop obsessing over women's looks. It's perverted and pathological the way women are constantly being scrutinized. Of course, it's a savvy tool to powertrip women but I am bored with the fucking nagging in regards to women's appearance.

That sounds somewhat reasonable. But Hendricks is the one pushing everyone to talk about her "curvy", "womanly" figure, so they don't call her fat.

by Anonymousreply 16905/15/2013

It seems to be the way to promote this show. They talk about her tits and Jon Hamm's huge cock.

by Anonymousreply 17005/15/2013

I like her curves - unlike many here - but admit that she is overweight (not obese). I think she gets away with it because the weight hasn't gone to her face. Anyone obese claiming her as one of their own, is having themselves on.

I still think she is healthier looking than some of the stick insect actors around the place.

by Anonymousreply 17105/15/2013

[quote]I like her curves - unlike many here - but admit that she is overweight (not obese). I think she gets away with it because the weight hasn't gone to her face. Anyone obese claiming her as one of their own, is having themselves on.

Yes, but at times she does look at the heavier range of the overweight category, see R81's link. Constance McCashin has a better figure than her, despite her infamous love of junk food:

by Anonymousreply 17205/15/2013

Yes, R172, but I have to work out like a fucking *bitch* to keep my svelte figure.

by Anonymousreply 17305/15/2013

What if we just call her a great big fat person.

by Anonymousreply 17405/15/2013

Christina Hendricks is a human roach nest!

by Anonymousreply 17505/15/2013

But ya are, Blanche.

by Anonymousreply 17605/15/2013

Describe her to me. I know what would be first on my list.

by Anonymousreply 17705/15/2013

She'd totally rock the cheese ball contest at michfest.

by Anonymousreply 17805/16/2013

She looks so matronly:

by Anonymousreply 17905/16/2013

So matronly...and so grotesque.

by Anonymousreply 18005/16/2013

She's lost considerable weight.

by Anonymousreply 18108/10/2013

"Curvy" is a shape, not a size. Marilyn Monroe was absolutely tiny-- she hips were 36 inches-- but her waist hip ratio was the definition of curvy.

Hendricks is just fat.

by Anonymousreply 18208/10/2013

r182, you have to factor in the bust. Hendricks is (was?) busty.

by Anonymousreply 18308/10/2013

Marilyn fluctuated, but you are right, she was curvy based on her proportions.

Christina is curvy herself. She has a relatively small waist for her bust and hips. She's also no longer fat based on the recent picture.

by Anonymousreply 18408/10/2013

She's craftily dressed in black. Her tits still precede her into any room. And now she just looks weird.

by Anonymousreply 18508/10/2013

Look at how slim her waist is, R185. She's lost weight.

by Anonymousreply 18608/10/2013

I think MM's hips were 36 at her smallest. They were not 36 in Some Like It Hot or Niagra.

by Anonymousreply 18708/10/2013

She claims her boobs are real.

by Anonymousreply 18808/10/2013

In news that will please the yearnings of many men, Christina Hendricks is set to play a stripper in the film adaptation of Gillian Flynn's best-selling thriller "Dark Places." The "Mad Men" actress joins Charlize Theron, Chloe Moretz, Nicholas Hoult and Corey Stoll in the Gilles Paquet-Brenner ("Sarah's Key," "Pretty Things") film.

Hendricks, who is no stranger to attracting buzz, plays Krissi Cates, who years ago accused a man (Stoll) of being a child molester. Krissi is down on her luck and must address secrets from her past that have implications for the accused man's older sister (Theron).

"Dark Places" marks one of two acclaimed Flynn novels to ink a movie deal recently. "Gone Girl," a 2012 best-seller, will receive a David Fincher adaptation, with Rosamund Pike and Ben Affleck in the lead roles.

by Anonymousreply 18908/31/2013

Even slim Christina still looks grotesque.

by Anonymousreply 19008/31/2013

Big titters!

by Anonymousreply 19108/31/2013

I feel bad for this girl. People discuss her figure and her shape so much, but it really has nothing to do with her. Men love to tell anyone who will listen that they think she's hot, because it's a way of bragging that they aren't shallow because they'd fuck a fat girl. And women love to applaud her full-figured shape because they think it will help them to better accept their own physical flaws. Because she's overweight, people think it's okay talk about her in a strictly sexual sense. But if she had an athletic body, and people said they same things about her, it would be perceived as being as creepy and exploitative as it is. Not to mention a weird form of pity.

But, most of all, if anyone gains a little weight, the LAST thing they want people to discuss is their weight. And that's all anybody discusses about her.

by Anonymousreply 19208/31/2013

i WISH someone would call me "full figured!"

by Anonymousreply 19308/31/2013

Let's face it, Christina. As the years go on, calling you full-figured would be a high compliment.

by Anonymousreply 19409/01/2013

What kind of weirdo are you r192? Sure, some women might enjoy calling a heavier woman sexy in order to feel better about their own weight. (Though the ONLY celeb I see that working for right now is Hendricks, actually.) But there isn't a single men in this universe who pretends to lust after the sex bomb secretary from Mad Men so that they don't seem shallow. Are you insane?

by Anonymousreply 19509/01/2013

She's fortunate in having a thin face.

by Anonymousreply 19609/01/2013

[all posts by ham-fisted troll a removed.]

by Anonymousreply 19709/01/2013

R197 - She is talented. She's been able to make Joan into a complex character.

by Anonymousreply 19809/01/2013

I'm not saying they're pretending, R195. I'm saying they're more vocal about their lust for her than they would be with someone of a more conventional shape because they think that makes them seem more admirable.

by Anonymousreply 19909/02/2013

Or maybe they like big boobs, R199

by Anonymousreply 20009/02/2013

Wrong outfit.

by Anonymousreply 20109/07/2013

I'd call that a hell of a lot more than full-figured. I'd call that wearing a tablecloth to enhance her tittays. Poor baby.

by Anonymousreply 20209/07/2013

At least this outfit works with her figure.

by Anonymousreply 20309/23/2013

I'd prefer her naked body to Claire Danes skinny and gross looking body! Hendricks has the perfect fuck body.

by Anonymousreply 20409/23/2013

Somewhere right in between Claire and Christina would be nice.

by Anonymousreply 20509/23/2013

Honey, you should consider being called full-figured as a full-blown compliment. Take it in the spirit it's intended.

by Anonymousreply 20609/24/2013

Christina carries it better than Kirstie.

by Anonymousreply 20709/24/2013

I dated Tom Irwin right after his breakup with Christina. The girl is a total bitch. She used him hardcore. I think she's great on Mad Men, but she is typical Hollywood: soulless.

by Anonymousreply 20809/24/2013

This bitch has been 37 for 200 years. God damn.

by Anonymousreply 20909/24/2013

She's 38.

by Anonymousreply 21009/24/2013

And her cup size is M, for MAMMOTH.

by Anonymousreply 21109/24/2013

Her size worked in the early days of Mad Men. Now she's carrying too much weight and it doesn't look good anymore.

She's not a blimp but she is fat. The industry standards for the industry she chooses to work in actually do matter.

She looks much prettier in person, really gorgeous.

by Anonymousreply 21209/24/2013

She's put on at least 20 lbs since Mad men started.

by Anonymousreply 21309/24/2013

She's like Sandra....from Confederate Northern Virginia where they still worship Robert E. Lee.

Yes, she's hot and beautiful but like Sandra, she's hiding A LOT (this is all conjecture, I'm sure).

by Anonymousreply 21409/24/2013

Sandra who?

by Anonymousreply 21509/24/2013

Here's a younger Christina in a commercial.

by Anonymousreply 21611/17/2013

Jeez, have never seen her before. I googled her, she's a life support for two buckets of silicone.

by Anonymousreply 21711/17/2013

R217 - You've never seen her before?

by Anonymousreply 21811/17/2013

No 218, I don't have cable. Breaking Bad, Sopranos etc., I've never seen them.

by Anonymousreply 21911/17/2013

She is on Mad Men. But she's been talked about a lot.

by Anonymousreply 22011/17/2013

And the bitch denies her udders are implants.

by Anonymousreply 22111/17/2013

Bitch should be lucky anyone finds her flabby, pasty, flat-ass attractive at all.

by Anonymousreply 22211/17/2013

Hard to believe in that commercial she once looked human (forget full figured).

by Anonymousreply 22311/17/2013

She looked great in Firefly.

by Anonymousreply 22411/17/2013

She also looked fine and was terrific in the 2011 NY Philharmonic production of Company with Neil Patrick Harris, which finally got aired on PBS a few weeks ago. She played the dumb airline hostess April really well, although she did strip down to her slip and bra, and, well, she probably shouldn't have.

by Anonymousreply 22511/19/2013

She's a good actress.

by Anonymousreply 22611/19/2013

She's still a house, good actress or not. Christina, honey, I think you should get used to "full-figured gal" and take it as it's meant: a high compliment.

by Anonymousreply 22711/20/2013

I don't know what her problem is. I have her figure (although my E cup size is natural)and I love it. So do the men--and women.

by Anonymousreply 22811/20/2013

R228. Are you a man or a woman?

by Anonymousreply 22911/20/2013

I know, Christina. I feel the same way when people talk about my giant, long, thick penis straining to escape my pants .

by Anonymousreply 23011/20/2013

A man with an E cup size?!

by Anonymousreply 23111/20/2013

She'd look better if she lost 20-30 lbs.

by Anonymousreply 23211/20/2013

R231. These days you can't be sure. It never hurts to ask! LOL!

by Anonymousreply 23311/20/2013

Big Tina's interviewer's rebuttal:

[bold]Hollywood's voluptuous beauty was offended? Go (full) figure...

[bold]Kate Waterhouse:

Last week I dropped the F-bomb and it went global. No, I didn't swear - the international media storm was because I called the Mad Men actress Christina Hendricks 'full-figured'.

I asked: 'You have been an inspiration as a full-figured woman; what is the most inspiring story that you can remember?' It seemed inoffensive to me, so I was shocked when she refused to answer the question and told me it was 'just rude'.

I was not intending to be rude. In fact, I think she is one of the sexiest women on the planet. Indeed, I would die for some of those curves! But no one can deny that Hendricks is voluptuous and, whether she likes it or not, she has become a poster girl for full-figured women - especially when considered next to your typical size zero Hollywood actress. Advertisement

I hope she realises that refusing to own up to the fact that she is full-figured only breeds more insecurity on body acceptance.

Unfortunately, she has now made the term full-figured a dirty word.

In response to my story, the editor-in-chief of the US-based Plus Model Magazine, Madeline Jones, told me she was disappointed by Hendricks's reaction. 'I was personally offended by it. She is a curvy woman and she is fuller than most women in Hollywood, so therefore she is a role model to plus-size women,' she said.

'She is a role model to 65 per cent of American women and millions around the world. What a powerful statement she could have made. She should be humbled that she can inspire so many people. The fact that she made such a big deal about it shows truth about how she feels and how she feels about her plus-size fans.'

Curiously, on the same day as my interview, Hendricks answered questions from News Ltd, including 'Have you ever felt a time in your career that you have had to change just to fit a model type' and 'Have you ever thought 'Oh gee, should I lose weight?'' She answered: 'It's important to embrace who you are and celebrate who you are and we are all completely different and I think that's gorgeous.'

Exactly right! For the record, full-figured is defined as 'amply proportioned', it does not mean fat or obese. It is a term to describe buxom and shapely, with broad hips and lots of sensuous, womanly curves as opposed to an androgynous waif-like figure. To me, this is political correctness gone mad.

So why did she take offence? No issues or topics were off limits for the interview and in my weekly Date with Kate column I often discuss weight, health and fitness. Her publicity people had approached me as she was being paid a significant sum of money to promote a brand of glasses in Australia.

As a journalist, my role is to ask what our readers would like to know. Her shapely appearance is an important part of her appeal, so it would have been unprofessional not to ask the question - albeit politely and with the best intentions. When I asked Kim Kardashian - who is also regarded as voluptuous in Hollywood terms - a similar question, she replied: 'I feel excited that young girls look up to me and I'm not your typical stick-skinny girl.'

Hendricks later told The Sun-Herald that she prefers her shape to be described as 'feminine'. But does that mean that I'm not feminine because I'm slight?

Since referring to Hendricks as full- figured, I have had countless abusive tweets, emails and comments about my weight. But I choose not to take offence. Yes, there are plenty of things I would change about my body. I would love bigger breasts and I'd kill for long legs. But I am proud of my body because I know that I eat well and I am healthy.

Above all, I celebrate women of all shapes and sizes.

by Anonymousreply 23412/05/2013

Link for above:

by Anonymousreply 23512/05/2013


Closing bold tag.

by Anonymousreply 23612/05/2013

[quote]And the bitch denies her udders are implants.

Her breasts are big because she gained so much weight. They're probably quite saggy without support. I have a friend who's built just like her. A good bra makes all the difference.

Look at what Lohan's (now obviously real) large breast looks like from the side. That's clearly a natural (and premature) sag.

by Anonymousreply 23712/05/2013

[bold]Bold over, yet?[/bold]


by Anonymousreply 23812/05/2013

In this picture.....

by Anonymousreply 23912/05/2013

And this one.....

You can see how Christina would be a great WW

by Anonymousreply 24012/05/2013

[/bold]Back fat

by Anonymousreply 24112/12/2013

Ham-hock arms

by Anonymousreply 24212/12/2013

Side profile

by Anonymousreply 24312/12/2013

She is gorgeous.

by Anonymousreply 24412/12/2013

[quote]She is gorgeous.

Oh, dear.

It's "ginormous", sweetie.

by Anonymousreply 24512/12/2013

Full-figured is putting it mildly, and kindly.

by Anonymousreply 24612/12/2013

Back fat #2

by Anonymousreply 24712/12/2013

Big Tina endorses everything. She looks like a gal who enjoys her margarine:

by Anonymousreply 24812/12/2013

Give her a fucking break, she is a hot mess, but she was a scream in the Neil Patrick Harris version of Company, and should better more comedy turns.

by Anonymousreply 24912/12/2013

Rose Mcgowan's fat little sister

by Anonymousreply 25012/12/2013

R220 - She does not have the WW look.

by Anonymousreply 25112/12/2013

Thigh fat:

by Anonymousreply 25212/15/2013

She does look gorgeous. Even in photos revealing backfat, the entire rest of her looks amazing. She's thick and beautiful, lets accept it and move on.

by Anonymousreply 25312/15/2013

R252 - That's actually flattering. Who is with her?

by Anonymousreply 25412/15/2013

She's unhealthy.

by Anonymousreply 25512/16/2013

Why does no one remark on her resemblance to Gabourney Sidibe?

by Anonymousreply 25601/15/2014


by Anonymousreply 25702/06/2014


by Anonymousreply 25802/06/2014

Have never understood the obsession with this sow. Bad dye job and her breasts are disgusting. Massive mounds of shapeless fat, squished together and overflowing under a too-tight top. Maybe quantity over quality matters to straight men, but I've seen good tits and these ain't good tits. These are fat girl tits.

by Anonymousreply 25902/06/2014

[quote]Plump is ok if they bring a lot of value

We're talking about women like they were steaks at the local Kroger now?

by Anonymousreply 26002/06/2014

Remember she has BMs the size of squirrels.

by Anonymousreply 26102/06/2014

She is full-figured and gorgeous. This is such a tedious thread. Let it go.

I love how you Americans obsess over certain celebrities being "fat". The truth is that more than 50% of your population is overweight. Not sure why you take it out on this woman or Jennifer Lawrence (who basically has the perfect figure) when there are millions of truly overweight men and women you could target.

by Anonymousreply 26202/06/2014

Her younger self had blondish hair and a normal-sized bust. If she regrets the attention her artificial hair and breasts generate, she should return to her more natural features.

by Anonymousreply 26302/06/2014

Better than calling you fat bitch-chi-sha... go run 'long now...

by Anonymousreply 26402/06/2014

There are far worse things she could be called

by Anonymousreply 26502/06/2014

Let Tina alone! What's done can't be undone and she'll just have to live with all the augmentation! And so will we.

by Anonymousreply 26602/06/2014

Probably best to say nothing then ! Calling her 'full figured' is being 'kind'. She's borderline Zaftig. Really. Give her a few more years and you'll see. PLUS, truth is the ideal for the past 40,50 years has been women that are no bigger than a size 8.

by Anonymousreply 26702/06/2014

R262 - Christina is several sizes larger than Jennifer Lawrence.

by Anonymousreply 26802/06/2014

Howzabout ZAFTIG?

I love that one...

by Anonymousreply 26902/06/2014

Zaftig fits Christina.

by Anonymousreply 27002/06/2014

Call her a whale

by Anonymousreply 27102/06/2014

Gut at 0:25

by Anonymousreply 27202/09/2014

I like the glasses R272

by Anonymousreply 27302/09/2014

Funny thing is, in recent photos (last several months), she appears to have lost about 15-20 pounds--maybe not from her boobs but from her midsection, and looks much better. In that last photo upthread she looks way thinner than last year's show (including her face). Maybe calling her full-figured has actually worked...

by Anonymousreply 27402/09/2014

She has lost some weight and is getting back her shape.

by Anonymousreply 27502/09/2014


by Anonymousreply 27602/23/2014


by Anonymousreply 27702/23/2014

Side gut

by Anonymousreply 27802/23/2014


by Anonymousreply 27902/23/2014


by Anonymousreply 28002/23/2014

Pot Belly

by Anonymousreply 28102/23/2014

Pot Belly 2

by Anonymousreply 28202/23/2014

"Side gut". How's that for her nickname?

by Anonymousreply 28302/23/2014

[italic]Although Hendricks had to be dragged away from the hot dog stand, she promised to return.[/italic]

by Anonymousreply 28402/23/2014

That before picture is hot! The perfect woman. Shame she didn't get famous earlier.

by Anonymousreply 28502/23/2014


by Anonymousreply 28602/23/2014


by Anonymousreply 28702/23/2014


by Anonymousreply 28802/23/2014

R279 looks like early in Mad Men's run.

by Anonymousreply 28902/23/2014


by Anonymousreply 29002/23/2014

She looked slimmer at Sundance this year:

by Anonymousreply 29102/23/2014

The size of squirrels, people!

by Anonymousreply 29202/24/2014

She looks best at the weight @ r279

by Anonymousreply 29302/24/2014

^^ Yeah, WHAT are you going on about?

It's unfortunate that she'd understand a comment about being 'full-figured' to be negative. I sensed it as a nod to her having delicious curves--a welcome sight, from a purely lustful perspective. But, I do understand it was kind of dim for the interviewers to have not worded it more carefully.

And I [italic]love[/italic] a girl in glasses.

...Here's a heartbreaking Mad Men scene, when Joan's good friend Carol admits that she loves her.

by Anonymousreply 29402/24/2014

R259 = very gay man

by Anonymousreply 29502/24/2014

Who said "I'm so over you" in 1960.

by Anonymousreply 29602/24/2014

All right, you're not full figured, You are FAT!

by Anonymousreply 29702/24/2014

Pic from a month ago. Not slim, but not bad.

by Anonymousreply 29802/24/2014

There's STILL an expedition lost inside those sagging, droopy, oversized meat curtains!

by Anonymousreply 29902/24/2014

Squirrels, I tell you - SQUIRRELS!!

by Anonymousreply 30002/24/2014

R298 Elizabeth Moss's face is terrifying in that pic.

by Anonymousreply 30102/24/2014

[quote][R298] Elizabeth Moss's face is terrifying in that pic.

Julianna Margulies looks awful in that picture with Tom Hanks. She took the zero percent body fat a tad too far.

by Anonymousreply 30202/24/2014

"morbidly obese" would be more accurate

by Anonymousreply 30302/24/2014

Holy cow, R299. You are an off-the-chart 'mo.

As for us gay girls, [italic]I'm getting that tingle in my tummy[/italic] just looking at these photos of her.

by Anonymousreply 30402/24/2014

Elisabeth looks overweight too, and she does not pull it off well.

by Anonymousreply 30502/24/2014

[quote]Elisabeth looks overweight too, and she does not pull it off well.

I saw Elisabeth M. in NYC last summer when she was shooting a film and she does not look overweight. She looked petite in person. It is crazy how much weight a camera adds.

by Anonymousreply 30602/25/2014

Camera or no camera, it's completely obvious that E. Moss is slender. Some people are just insane.

by Anonymousreply 30702/25/2014

Hendricks is a natural blonde.

by Anonymousreply 30803/06/2014

No joke - SQUIRRELS. Seriously.

by Anonymousreply 30903/07/2014

Tipping me over in a field is even ruder!

by Anonymousreply 31003/08/2014

What's this squirrel shit?

by Anonymousreply 31103/08/2014

Big Tina looked fatter than ever in her full-figured interview:

by Anonymousreply 31203/12/2014

Loud prints don't work on big women like Christina:

by Anonymousreply 31303/27/2014

No they don't.

by Anonymousreply 31403/27/2014

Big Tina's outfit from the interview:

by Anonymousreply 31503/29/2014

I actually like it R315

by Anonymousreply 31603/29/2014

Are they really as big as SQUIRRELS?

by Anonymousreply 31703/29/2014

Timeline of her weight gain:

by Anonymousreply 31804/09/2014

Nothing about Hendricks is natural as this 1999 photo proves.

by Anonymousreply 31904/14/2014

That's some photo, R319! Thanks for posting it.

by Anonymousreply 32004/14/2014

ROLF, R245.

by Anonymousreply 32104/14/2014

R319 - She's not flat chested there.

by Anonymousreply 32204/14/2014


by Anonymousreply 32304/16/2014

How about "Facunt" or "C-Barge"?

by Anonymousreply 32404/28/2014

[quote]How about "Facunt" or "C-Barge"?

Appropriate. But Hendricks official DL designation is Big Tina Hendricks or Fat Sow Christina Hendricks.

See AnnE for for Anne Hathaway whilst Anne Fakeaway or Anne Fauxhumilityway also work she's already been given an official name.

by Anonymousreply 32505/01/2014

She's looking thinner on Mad Men.

by Anonymousreply 32605/01/2014

[all posts by childish idiot removed]

by Anonymousreply 32705/01/2014

Are they really as big as squirrels?

by Anonymousreply 32805/02/2014

Yes, as big as squirrels.

by Anonymousreply 32905/02/2014

Just saw her in "God's Pocket," where her breasts looked beyond ridiculous. They were practically up to her neck and nothing on her moved naturally. I watch a LOT of indie movies with a lot of different body types and never even notice when someone doesn't have a Hollywood figure... until Christina.

by Anonymousreply 33005/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 33105/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 33205/08/2014

Christina Hendricks: 'Calling me full-figured is just true.'

I fixed that for you.

by Anonymousreply 33305/08/2014

I thought she looked good in R331's pic.

by Anonymousreply 33405/08/2014


by Anonymousreply 33505/09/2014


by Anonymousreply 33605/09/2014

Too fussy. Makes her look even fatter.

by Anonymousreply 33705/15/2014

That's a good pic R337

by Anonymousreply 33805/15/2014

Is it true she's really good in God's Pocket?

by Anonymousreply 33905/15/2014

Mel Brooks: "Calling me Jewish is just rude"

by Anonymousreply 34005/22/2014

She looked much slimmer in the last Mad Men where Bob Benson proposes.

by Anonymousreply 34105/22/2014

She looked mammoth last season.

by Anonymousreply 34205/22/2014

She looks like the fat office frau:

by Anonymousreply 34305/28/2014


by Anonymousreply 34405/28/2014


by Anonymousreply 34505/28/2014


by Anonymousreply 34606/01/2014


by Anonymousreply 34706/01/2014


by Anonymousreply 34806/01/2014


by Anonymousreply 34906/01/2014


by Anonymousreply 35006/01/2014


by Anonymousreply 35106/01/2014

Full figured is better than overweight cow!

by Anonymousreply 35206/01/2014


by Anonymousreply 35306/01/2014

Good lord are those huge knockers real?

She looks pregnant in the belly area. Unless she has stopped wearing Spanx.

by Anonymousreply 35406/01/2014

She looks good here.

by Anonymousreply 35506/04/2014

On the Tonight Show. Definitively slimmer, and looking gorgeous.

by Anonymousreply 35606/24/2014

New photos. Still fat.

by Anonymousreply 35707/19/2014

No, R355, she looks huge. Her face and arms are still but her body's huge. She isn't even curvy. Look at the photos above. Her waist is bigger than her husband's and barely goes in. She's Spanxed to the max in every outfit. Can we see a photo of her where she isn't covered up and in shapewear. She's overweight.

by Anonymousreply 35807/19/2014

She looks the same size as always in that gold skirt ^^. If you think she isn't overweight take a look in the mirror. She has a gut.

by Anonymousreply 35907/19/2014

Her waist is about 30 inches with girdle. It might be smaller than her hips and boobs but there's no denying her hips are wide.

by Anonymousreply 36007/19/2014

Her publicist works over-time to promote her "curviness". She's just a great big fat person. She should be thankful no one called her "stocky" or "big boned".

by Anonymousreply 36107/19/2014

Her waist.

by Anonymousreply 36207/19/2014

I'm an ass man and big tit fan...but some curious reason she does nothing for me. On paper that hip-to-waist ratio may perhaps equal classic hourglass; in reality, however, it's the waist numbers that matter most. Hendricks waist is far too thick and merely makes her upper body, shoulders, hips, and overall appearance robust or matronly.

Academic studies have found that by altering a models picture by narrowing just the waist to achieve the perfect ratio 0.7(IIRC); or alternatively only altering the hips (broadening) but leaving waist unaltered..the smaller waist wins virtually every time among males studied. Moreover, guys will specify a preference for an smaller waist than the standard 0.7 ideal.

In my opinion that real ideal sexy curvy woman is a mixture of the delicate and plushly fleshy. Christina, however, is in BBW territory. Not that that's a bad thing. In keeping with the shows era, I think "curvy" should be reserved for classic Gina Lollobrigidas, Sophia Lorens, Marilyn? (in her nude pics she has no ass or tits to speak of).

Hendicks's lustrous luminescent alabaster skin IS kinda hot tho.

by Anonymousreply 36307/19/2014

She's a top heavy hourglass.

by Anonymousreply 36407/19/2014

WTF? Is some brazen cad copping a feel in R355? LOL

by Anonymousreply 36507/19/2014

That's hysterical R365 and it looks like a woman's hand.

Maybe a randy lesbian?

by Anonymousreply 36607/19/2014

You must be at least kinda gay, R363, if Christina Hendricks does nothing for you.

In her 1960's Joan get-up, she is unquestionably sexy.

by Anonymousreply 36707/19/2014

R365 good question.

by Anonymousreply 36807/19/2014

I like her character on Mad Men (although I did not watch the previous season because Winer lost me and I can't be bothered if he can't be bothered), and in general I think she is a good actress. However, she seems to be in the most shit indie movies that she does over her hiatus. Except for Drive, which she had a minor role, she cannot seem to get in any decent movies. I hope that changes once Mad Men is over next year.

I will say that I see her having a film career over John Hamm. He does not have that elusive "it" factor for the big screen.

by Anonymousreply 36907/19/2014

Christina in Company (2013). I can see her having a Broadway career.

by Anonymousreply 37007/19/2014

BMs the size of squirrels. Just reminding you.

by Anonymousreply 37107/20/2014


by Anonymousreply 37208/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 37308/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 37408/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 37508/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 37608/02/2014

She has a gut in everything.

by Anonymousreply 37708/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 37808/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 37908/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 38008/02/2014


by Anonymousreply 38108/02/2014

i liked her in Company.

by Anonymousreply 38208/02/2014

What did R220 mean by WW?

by Anonymousreply 38308/02/2014

Wonder-woman, R383?

by Anonymousreply 38408/02/2014

The bitch is fat. Her ass is incredibly flat as well. She actually has a horrible shape if you look at her sideways, but her boobs camouflage all of the problem areas.

by Anonymousreply 38508/02/2014

She looks slimmer in R379

by Anonymousreply 38608/02/2014

Thank you 384!

by Anonymousreply 38708/02/2014

She has rather pronounced collar bones.

by Anonymousreply 38808/02/2014

She looks more like a walking mountain range to me.

by Anonymousreply 38908/02/2014

R358 Her husband looks very skinny though. If she is overweight then she's the best looking overweight person in the world.

by Anonymousreply 39008/02/2014

I think she looks wonderful.

A normal sized woman, and one who is put together and cares about her appearance. Looks classy and doesn't look bland, suburban or as if she stopped giving a fuck.

by Anonymousreply 39108/02/2014

Perhaps it's rude to call someone full-figured. But then it's also rude to call someone fat, even though it may well be true.

by Anonymousreply 39208/02/2014

Interview in The Guardian to promote her film with PSH, God's Pocket. Disappointed to learn she's one of those people who register their pets as service animals so they can carry them on planes, despite all lack of therapeutic need.

by Anonymousreply 39308/03/2014

R393's link

"I've been asked by Hendricks's PR not to ask any questions about her body in the interview. But, obviously, I try to bring it up anyway. Hendricks spots the approach from a mile off. "Don't do it," she says firmly, before I even get to the end of the sentence. She smiles but it's quite clear she means it. She finishes her raw steak and then places her knife and fork together on the plate. Just like Joan, there's a steely underwiring beneath that pale-skinned, blush-cheeked exterior."

by Anonymousreply 39408/04/2014

I love the subtle dig at her eating raw steak. Bitch, you can stall me all you want but I am gonna write that you are a COW!

by Anonymousreply 39508/04/2014

And the wine.

by Anonymousreply 39608/04/2014

Joan being a total bitch to Paul Kinsey:

by Anonymousreply 39708/04/2014

Huge Tina

by Anonymousreply 39808/04/2014

R397 - Paul deserved it.

by Anonymousreply 39908/04/2014

R386, that photo is older, all the others are recent.

by Anonymousreply 40008/04/2014

If R379 is Christina looking 'good' I don't want to see what she looks like now! Those melons she calls tits look like they're suffocating.

by Anonymousreply 40108/04/2014

I think she jacks up the size of her implants each time she puts on weight (see link). She's either delusional or in denial if she thinks people aren't going to comment on those freakish chin rests. In contrast, Dolly Parton responds with humor and doesn't take herself so f*ing seriously.

by Anonymousreply 40208/04/2014


by Anonymousreply 40408/04/2014

What do you queens care about her weight? You don't see straight guys going on about Jonah Hill.

by Anonymousreply 40508/04/2014

[quote]You don't see straight guys going on about Jonah Hill.

No, but you see gays guys discussing his disgusting obesity.

by Anonymousreply 40608/04/2014

Well, actually maybe straight guys do make cracks on his weight but the difference is he is is/was/is once again genuinely obese. Christina Hendricks isn't. I doubt many straight guys are put off by her weight.

by Anonymousreply 40708/04/2014

And my point is gays aren't supposed to fancy her, just as straights aren't supposed to fancy Jonah Hill or other guys.

by Anonymousreply 40808/04/2014

She has what might be called a Lainie Kazan figure.

by Anonymousreply 40908/04/2014

She'll be lucky if she's called anything once Mad Men ends.

by Anonymousreply 41008/04/2014

[quote]And my point is gays aren't supposed to fancy her, just as straights aren't supposed to fancy Jonah Hill or other guys.

The gays don't fancy him either. At any weight.

by Anonymousreply 41108/04/2014

She seems to be doing well in theater.

by Anonymousreply 41208/05/2014

There was a blind about her getting turned down at auditions specifically because it's thought she is too fat, and that she is losing weight and is considering a breast reduction.

by Anonymousreply 41308/14/2014

where was that BL?

by Anonymousreply 41408/16/2014

Looking fat in recent video.

by Anonymousreply 41508/17/2014


by Anonymousreply 41608/17/2014

That lardy thigh.

by Anonymousreply 41708/17/2014

R415 - That was a well done video.

by Anonymousreply 41808/17/2014

She’s Melissa McCarthy without the jokes.

She’s Precious without the welfare check.

by Anonymousreply 41908/24/2014

There’s a deluded three hundred pound frau on this thread. Everytime it gets bumped up, she’s there heralding Big Tina’s weight loss and how she’s soooooo not fat.

by Anonymousreply 42008/24/2014

Profile shots are not her friend.

by Anonymousreply 42108/24/2014


by Anonymousreply 42208/24/2014

It’s rare to see obese people care like her. Most have given up.

by Anonymousreply 42308/24/2014

She looks normal. Considering the normal ‘Murkin, that’s not a healthy thing.

by Anonymousreply 42408/24/2014

The stop for Curvytown was forty pounds ago. She’s in Fatgirltown.

by Anonymousreply 42508/24/2014

If she only wants to lose weight for roles then she’ll gain it back. She needs to want to lose it for the sake of her health.

by Anonymousreply 42608/24/2014

She's lovely, and not at all obese.

by Anonymousreply 42708/24/2014

R427 = Ginny in Billing.

What happened to those brownies Shelley brought in, Ginny?

by Anonymousreply 42808/24/2014

She was miscast in Company. Too fat to be believable as a sexy air hostess. I see the baby voice and now she’s supposed to be sexy, but she isn’t, she’s big.

by Anonymousreply 43008/24/2014

Her phony baby voice sounds so odd on a great, big, fat woman.

by Anonymousreply 43108/24/2014

Big boobs, big thighs —— where’s the nipped-in waist?

by Anonymousreply 43208/24/2014

She’s not an hourglass. Her waist doesn’t go in —— without Spanx.

by Anonymousreply 43308/24/2014

She’s a cello.

by Anonymousreply 43408/24/2014

Darlin’, she’s a whole orchestra.

by Anonymousreply 43508/24/2014

Once the roles stop coming in after Mad Men ends, she’ll probably blow-up.

by Anonymousreply 43608/24/2014

She needs to get back to here Firefly weight. What happened?

by Anonymousreply 43708/24/2014

Maybe she has a glandular problem.

by Anonymousreply 43808/24/2014

Too much lunch R437

by Anonymousreply 43908/24/2014

She's a lot thinner than Melissa.

by Anonymousreply 44008/24/2014

She's a life support system for those silicon melons.

by Anonymousreply 44108/24/2014

She looks thinner here at an Emmy pre-party.

by Anonymousreply 44208/24/2014

She doesn't, R442. Although, black suits her. Dark colors are slimming.

by Anonymousreply 44308/25/2014


by Anonymousreply 44410/08/2014

With Bellamy Young and Betsy Brandt. CH looks better.

by Anonymousreply 44510/08/2014

Wonder what this bitch looks like naked

by Anonymousreply 44610/08/2014

Fashion disaster

by Anonymousreply 44711/06/2014

What about "Ed-Asner-esque" ?

And what's more, this discussion is useless without pie. And ice cream.

by Anonymousreply 44811/06/2014

Born 1975 supposedly.

by Anonymousreply 45011/07/2014

She at least looks proportional in that outfit in R447

by Anonymousreply 45111/08/2014

She has a thin skin and hates the constant carping over fashion faux pas or what she perceives as the non-issue of her weight. "I am too emotional," she admits. "I do take things personally because someone is always wanting to criticise or say something negative. I don't know why it is. I'm sure there's tons of blogs out there about how horrible Meryl Streep is." She guffaws at the thought. "And we all know that's not true."

She's right that her physical attributes come up again and again whenever she is interviewed or written about. On one level you can understand why – in a world where wraith-like thinness in actresses is revered, Hendricks is full-blooded proof that gorgeousness can exist, and be embraced, in a different construct. Her costumes in Mad Men – fitted dresses with nipped-in waists and knee-length pencil skirts worn over uncomfortable girdles and underwired long-line bras – only served to accentuate her hourglass figure and have influenced a host of fashion designers.

On another level you can also see why Hendricks is fed up with talking about it, because it is demeaning to suggest that the success of any woman's work depends on her vital statistics rather than her talent.

I've been asked by Hendricks's PR not to ask any questions about her body in the interview. But, obviously, I try to bring it up anyway. Hendricks spots the approach from a mile off. "Don't do it," she says firmly, before I even get to the end of the sentence. She smiles but it's quite clear she means it. She finishes her raw steak and then places her knife and fork together on the plate. Just like Joan, there's a steely underwiring beneath that pale-skinned, blush-cheeked exterior.

by Anonymousreply 45211/22/2014

Call her a fat cunt who can't dress for shit who is weeks away from emulating the last phase of Joan Crawford's career and see what she says. Full figured never bothered Marilyn Monroe or Jane Russell. Pretentious basic cable twat. Better yet, TWUNT! El Twunte Grande!

by Anonymousreply 45311/27/2014

Do you ever get tired of your own nastiness, R453?

by Anonymousreply 45411/27/2014

She's chubbier than Marilyn was.

by Anonymousreply 45511/27/2014

I'm totally gay, but I would love to explore Christina's curves.

She is sex on a stick.

by Anonymousreply 45611/27/2014

no 454. It keeps me alive. I kill your pets! I KEEL them!

by Anonymousreply 45711/27/2014

Calling me sarcastic is just true.

by Anonymousreply 45811/28/2014

[quote] "Call her a fat cunt who can't dress for shit who is weeks away from emulating the last phase of Joan Crawford's career and see what she says. Full figured never bothered Marilyn Monroe or Jane Russell. Pretentious basic cable twat. Better yet, TWUNT! El Twunte Grande!"

R453, your post made me laugh till tears rolled down my legs.

by Anonymousreply 45911/28/2014

[quote]I'm sure there's tons of blogs out there about how horrible Meryl Streep is." She guffaws at the thought. "And we all know that's not true."

Could she be pretending that she hasn't been on DL before?

by Anonymousreply 46011/28/2014

[quote] Calling me full-figured is just rude.

Would she prefer fat?

by Anonymousreply 46111/28/2014

She is overweight, but Christina does have great skin.

by Anonymousreply 46211/29/2014

A little slimmer?

by Anonymousreply 46302/13/2015

You know, Hendricks had no problem earning money as a model while playing up, to put it lightly, her enormous assets. If she did not have the body type she has she never would have been cast on Mad Men.

She uses her voluptuousness to make money and get acting jobs but she is clearly unhappy about the way she looks. Weird!

by Anonymousreply 46402/13/2015

What are we supposed to call her? Slender and petite? Should the Australian journalist phrased her question as, "Well, chubbo you've probably inspired a lot of other chubbos. Are there any chubbos that inspired you?"

The chick has got issues.

by Anonymousreply 46502/14/2015

R465 If the journalist was Australian then I'd be surprised if they didn't say something like that.

by Anonymousreply 46602/14/2015

She's more fat than curvy.

by Anonymousreply 46702/14/2015

R464 -"If she did not have the body type she has she never would have been cast on Mad Men."

She has gained about 20 lbs since Mad Men started

by Anonymousreply 46802/14/2015

She's fat. More attractive than most fat girls, sure, but she's still fat.

by Anonymousreply 46902/14/2015

I think Hendricks is unbelievably beautiful. I'm a 9 on the kinsey and I'd do her- gorgeous. Nice to see a woman with an actual figure, I'd gladly have that voluptuous ginger on my arm.

by Anonymousreply 47002/14/2015

How much do you think she weighs?

by Anonymousreply 47104/25/2015

R465 they are supposed to not ask her about her body. It is considered rude to be commenting on a woman's tits or ass or size. If she were a size zero, no one would bring it up in interviews. At most you'd get a how do you keep in shape question.

by Anonymousreply 47204/25/2015

Straight men love her. They don't seem to think she's fat, but they think women much thinner than her are.

by Anonymousreply 47304/25/2015

Christina Hendricks is a homely fatso who got lucky by landing the part of Joan.

She has used her enormous breasts and the rest of her "curves" to draw attention to herself and to land parts and now whines, "Why does everyone make such a big deal about my body????" (And then she proceeds to show up on the red carpet with her "twins" sticking out the top of her gown.)

Because you have used it as a selling point hon'! Ever hear of breast reduction surgery (and while we're at it, ever hear of but firming exercises?)?

Christina Hendricks LOOKS like she has emotional problems and that red hair looks hideous on her.

Once Mad Men is done and over with Hendricks, Jones and Hamm will be done and over with too.

by Anonymousreply 47404/25/2015

Come on, she's not homely at all. Elizabeth Moss is homely.

by Anonymousreply 47504/25/2015

Zac Efron is full figured, rigtht? Thas's wahat all the posts were about wasn't it.

by Anonymousreply 47604/25/2015

I agree with R475. There is nothing homely about her. She has lovely features.

by Anonymousreply 47704/25/2015

R471 Anyone?

170 lbs? 180 lbs?

by Anonymousreply 47804/25/2015


by Anonymousreply 47904/25/2015

R474 you sound like a jealous frau. She is a bit overweight but her coloring is beautiful.

by Anonymousreply 48004/25/2015

I agree R480

by Anonymousreply 48104/25/2015

I think you're an ugly woman, Christina. I saw the picture online, and I felt compelled to tell you how disgusting you look, and you have a cigarette. You're not woman enough to be called full-figured. You're just nasty.

by Anonymousreply 48205/11/2015

Based on these pics, it looks like she has lost weight.

by Anonymousreply 48305/11/2015
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!