For better or for worse, most of the profiles we’ve read on "Mad Men" star Christina Hendricks, 37, throw in a mention or two of her enviably curvaceous figure.
For better or for worse, most of the profiles we’ve read on "Mad Men" star Christina Hendricks, 37, throw in a mention or two of her enviably curvaceous figure.
|by Anonymous||reply 483||05/11/2015|
Would she prefer "fat fuck?"
|by Anonymous||reply 1||10/05/2012|
She really is an idiot. She's confusing Full Figure with Plus Size. She bought the tits and thrusts them out every where she goes and when someone comments on her figure, she's gets upset.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||10/05/2012|
As opposed to "fat"?
|by Anonymous||reply 3||10/05/2012|
How about curvy with major breast implants?
|by Anonymous||reply 4||10/05/2012|
Later she changed her mind and remarked, "You can call me anything as long as you don't call me late for dinner."
|by Anonymous||reply 5||10/05/2012|
She passed full figure this season and is now downright obese.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||10/05/2012|
And then they showed the entire interview even with the gaffes. How come?
|by Anonymous||reply 7||10/05/2012|
Isn't she girdled to hell and back in the show?
|by Anonymous||reply 8||10/05/2012|
Christina says she wears her glasses all the time even to award shows. No, Christina, you don't.
Your tits are front and center sans any glasses, you full-figured mama.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||10/05/2012|
Full-figured is not an insult -- it's just a description. I mean, they called Jane Russell "full-figured" in this Playtex bra commercial.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||10/05/2012|
Fine, you're a cow.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||10/05/2012|
She has such a beautiful face. Those fake tits are huge!
|by Anonymous||reply 12||10/05/2012|
And Christina, of course you always try so hard to hide your full figure.
Wherever on earth did anyone ever get the idea that your extraordinary bazzooms might cause anyone to think of you as full-figured?
|by Anonymous||reply 13||10/05/2012|
[quote]She passed full figure this season and is now downright obese.
No she isn't. You don't even know what actual obese looks like, do you, Karen Carpenter?
|by Anonymous||reply 14||10/05/2012|
She's a fat cunt.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||10/05/2012|
She's just Kathy Bates without the cancer.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||10/05/2012|
DL, Would you call Marilyn Monroe "full-figured?" There's a difference between "curvy" and fat. Of course in Hollywood a naturally busty women with toned hips and a size 10 might be considered all of the above.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||10/05/2012|
"Full figured" is not an insult, but of course it's never polite to comment too much on anyone's body, even in a flattering way. I'm sure she's sick to death of talk about her bod, and all the veiled allusions to her poundage.
And yes, she is corseted to hell and back on "Mad Men", women in those days wore girdles, cinch belts, and bullet bras. It's a great look for her, much better than anything she's ever work in real life.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||10/05/2012|
She is full figured. Christina is plumper than Marilyn was. I think she carries weight well, but would look better if she lost about 10-15 lbs (like she was earlier in Mad Men).
|by Anonymous||reply 19||10/06/2012|
She probably IS clinically obese. You'd be surprised at what physicians consider obese.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||10/06/2012|
Christina is about 5'7". Clinical obesity (BMI above 30) starts at about 190 at that height. Christina is NOT 190. She might be 170 at most, and probably 160.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||10/06/2012|
Honestly, I think she is fat. Full-figured is a compliment.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||10/06/2012|
No, Christina, they're merely being diplomatic and polite.
Plus there's no such term as "fat-figured."
|by Anonymous||reply 23||10/06/2012|
It is rude to call her full-figured since she's clearly "rubenesque"
|by Anonymous||reply 24||10/06/2012|
Marilyn Monroe was much thinner. She would have been called 'curvy' or hourglass. Hendricks is full figured b/c while she's curvy, she's way heavier than most curvy celebs of the past. She's a big girl. Nothing wrong with that.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||10/06/2012|
R24 - actually the figures in the paintings Rubens painted were very full on bottom, but not so big in the boobs.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||10/06/2012|
And her ass is still flat as the Midwestern Plains.
And just as wide.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||10/06/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 28||10/06/2012|
She should totally play Ginger Grant in the Gilligan's Island movie.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||10/06/2012|
Her proportions are so odd. From the tits down she's really fat (just look at her midsection and thighs when she's not wearing clothes that hide it or girdle it in), but her arms and face are skinny. She has a pretty face, though.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||10/06/2012|
She's got a bit of a belly, but not much. I like her proportions, though she could lose a little.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||10/06/2012|
Full-figured = Big tits, matching hips and a small waist.
For some reason, men seem to like this look.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||10/06/2012|
R32, I thought that that was just curvy. So what was Marilyn Monroe? What size dress does Hendricks wear, without a girdle. Size 10 is now average for ladies, although not for actresses.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||10/06/2012|
I'd guess Christina is a 12 now. MM at her absolute heaviest was a 6-8 in today's sizes.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||10/06/2012|
She does have a flat ass and small arms.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||10/06/2012|
Exactly. Marilyn was never bigger than a six 8 of today. Marilyn was a C cup and at her heaviest 140 pounds.
Even with vanity sizing, Hendricks is at least a size 12. She's at minimum 40 inches on top and a 40 in hip area. Her waist isn't Marilyn's 22 inches either, she's more like 29 inch waist with heavy corseting/girdle.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||10/06/2012|
They pad her for Mad Men.
In real life she is probably full figured but the cameras make her look a little chubby.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||10/06/2012|
R36, I think MM was a solid D at her heaviest. MM also had an odd midsection, very thin waist, but she almost always had a belly pooch. Marilyn also had comparatively plumper arms. Marilyn's figure is probably closest to Scar Jo's today - though Scarlett doesn't have as defined of a waist.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||10/06/2012|
Someone is in denial. They girdle Christina up to the gills in Mad Men. In real life her waist is huge without the girdle/spanx cinching her in. Lucky for her in Mad Men it's expected that a woman would be wearing girdles and bullet bras to show off the curves.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||10/06/2012|
She looks like the pretty girl from the trailer park, in the face. In a non northern state.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||10/06/2012|
Yes, she is heavy. Luckily, it suits her...but she IS heavy.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||10/06/2012|
Even without the girdle, Christina's waist isn't huge. Actually, R40, I think Christina looks like the hot waitress at a southern diner.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||10/06/2012|
She also resembles those sex workers in the documentaries of the legal brothels, like C ranch. Same type.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||10/06/2012|
Christina, give us a week and well take off the weight! You'll have your own ad campaign too.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||10/06/2012|
She looked good in the leaked cell phone pics
|by Anonymous||reply 45||10/06/2012|
She looked great, too bad about the dead ugly husband.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||10/06/2012|
R32, So if most men prefer the curvy look, why are most actresses the opposite?
|by Anonymous||reply 47||10/06/2012|
R47: Good question.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||10/06/2012|
It is rude, she's not some old lady who is full-figured. The bitch is "Thick"!
|by Anonymous||reply 49||10/06/2012|
Christina is downright skinny compared to a lot of American women today.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||10/06/2012|
She looks a hella lot hotter in r45's pix.
|by Anonymous||reply 51||10/06/2012|
Yeah -- and I'm sure you boys all look like fucking Adonis.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||10/06/2012|
Don't call me tiny!
|by Anonymous||reply 53||10/06/2012|
Don't call me African-American!
|by Anonymous||reply 54||10/06/2012|
Don't call me butch!
|by Anonymous||reply 55||10/06/2012|
Her boobs look real.
|by Anonymous||reply 56||10/06/2012|
Her boobs are obviously fake. You can see the outline of the capsules in some pictures. And there are old photos of her in playboy that are obviously pre-augmentation.
|by Anonymous||reply 57||10/06/2012|
She's about the same size as Nigella Lawson at her heaviest.
|by Anonymous||reply 58||10/06/2012|
R32, because the camera puts on 10 pounds, and because America is conditioned to pick apart the weight of females in the media.
Most men settle for rotund because they can't attract what they see on TV or well-made porn. They say they don't want skinny women, but what they mean is they don't want Twiggy or the early Kate Moss. They do not look for plump women, but if that's the best bet, they're ok with it.
Plump is ok if they bring a lot of value, especially if they love sex and aren't lazy
|by Anonymous||reply 59||10/07/2012|
A few decades ago, there were more sexpot TV actresses who were pushing chubby: Adrienne Barbeau on Maude, Marilu Henner on Taxi, Loretta Swit on MASH (early years), etc.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||10/07/2012|
She's a fat fuck
|by Anonymous||reply 62||10/07/2012|
My acting teacher thinks she is a one-note actress. He says she tries to be sexy in every scene she is in instead of connecting with the other performers. No subtlety in her performance at all.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||10/07/2012|
I love her on Mad Men but her film career, despite several film roles, is going absolutely nowhere.
|by Anonymous||reply 64||10/07/2012|
R63 - your film teacher has not watched enough Mad Men. Yes, often, she plays up the sexiness, but she has made Joan into a very complex character.
R64 - So what? Joan has become an iconic character on an iconic TV show.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||10/07/2012|
Is it the dress, or has Christina put on more weight?
|by Anonymous||reply 66||10/21/2012|
I'm 5'4" and if I weighed even 135lbs, I'd consider myself pretty fat. Good for her but I don't think I could let myself get that large.
It is really bizarre, as others have mentioned, that she has a thin face and arms.
|by Anonymous||reply 67||10/21/2012|
R67, I'm 5'3" and start feeling chubby around 130 (where I am now).
|by Anonymous||reply 68||10/21/2012|
I'm 5'3" and you don't WANT to know what I weigh. I go up and down. But I think Christina Hendricks has to "own" that she's an actress, and it's a pretty visual medium, especially film and TV. I read online somewhere that she finds it frustrating, to be a size 14, when it's time for costume fittings.
As well, she might: most actresses, for good or bad, these days are size 0, 2, 4, 6; an 8 is considered bordeline chunky (not be me: but an not an actress.)
There are people who have had breast reduction. Not saying she should, but I've read about plenty of people, NOT in showbiz, that have.
TO the question within: I would pleasantly but vehemently DISAGREE that calling her full-figured is just rude. Uh, NO, dear: it just shows that people have, you know: EYEsight??!!
|by Anonymous||reply 69||10/21/2012|
She needs to pay more attention to what she's wearing.
|by Anonymous||reply 70||10/21/2012|
she has a bm once a week
|by Anonymous||reply 71||10/21/2012|
|by Anonymous||reply 72||10/22/2012|
New pics, even fuller.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||10/27/2012|
At the season 6 premiere, even heavier
|by Anonymous||reply 74||03/21/2013|
When Mad Men is over no one will talk about her at all. She needs to shut up and tighten that girdle.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||03/21/2013|
She is full figured, so what's her fucking problem.
|by Anonymous||reply 76||03/22/2013|
She looks fantastic on the show,but in real life she rarely wears clothes that suit her.
I don't find her a one note actress at all.
|by Anonymous||reply 77||03/22/2013|
I've only seen her in Firefly and Mad Nen, but she was great in both.
|by Anonymous||reply 78||03/22/2013|
Big difference between full figured, a bit overweight, and fat. All depends on how PC you're being
|by Anonymous||reply 79||03/22/2013|
Boo hoo, fatty. You make a shitload of money and are on a hit show, tough shit if you get "offended" when people talk about your gross body that is always on display. If it were me I would ask if you were in your 5th trimester with that gut. Oh and nice cankles.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||03/22/2013|
If by 'full' they mean 'full of pie and ice cream' then it fits.
|by Anonymous||reply 81||03/22/2013|
My god, she is big.
|by Anonymous||reply 83||03/22/2013|
Isn't she the actress who has bm's the size of squirrels?
|by Anonymous||reply 84||03/22/2013|
She really is a big woman, to call her "full-figured" is a compliment as she's clearly overweight.
|by Anonymous||reply 85||03/22/2013|
She is gorgeous and a decent actress. I guess she is a bit sensitive about how she is presented in the media. Every single article mentions her figure. I guess that must get tedious. As though that's all she is about. Her Joan is great in a show where there are few characters to care about. Most of them are horrible. Love thd show though.
|by Anonymous||reply 86||03/22/2013|
Her face isn't beautiful, she's a "jolie ladie" at best. She's wants the media to talk about her "full-figure" constantly, probably because she doesn't want to give up pie.
|by Anonymous||reply 87||03/22/2013|
Her face on its own would never garner any attention because she's pretty/average at best. She's one of those girls who think they're better than they are because their breasts get them attention. Your chest is turning heads, dear, not your face.
|by Anonymous||reply 88||03/22/2013|
I think she's gorgeous but do admit she is thick by Hollywood standards. Still, I like that she isn't a lollipop headed anorexic like everyone else.
|by Anonymous||reply 89||03/22/2013|
[quote]Her face on its own would never garner any attention because she's pretty/average at best. She's one of those girls who think they're better than they are because their breasts get them attention. Your chest is turning heads, dear, not your face.
Yes! If people stopped looking at her image and judged solely by her facial features. They'd see she's quite plain.
[quote]Still, I like that she isn't a lollipop headed anorexic like everyone else.
Most respected Hollywood actresses are a healthy weight. Hendricks is overweight.
And her fake breasts aren't fooling anyone.
|by Anonymous||reply 90||03/22/2013|
Many Hollywood actresses are too skinny: Angelina Jolie, Keira Knightly.
If CH's face is not at least pretty then I'd like to know who is pretty/beautiful.
It's not just about her lovely breasts. I like to think they're real bye. Most women would not go for breast implants that big. Plastic surgeons might even advise against that size, given the strain it can put on your back.
|by Anonymous||reply 91||03/22/2013|
[quote]Many Hollywood actresses are too skinny: Angelina Jolie, Keira Knightly.
Jolie is too thin. I don't know if Knightley is naturally thin or not, but she is quite slim.
However most fraus don't like to admit that most A-List actresses in Hollywood are a perfectly healthy weight (slim yes, but not malnourished). They also like to delude themselves into thinking Hendricks "curvy" body is the type men find attractive.
[quote]If CH's face is not at least pretty then I'd like to know who is pretty/beautiful.
[quote]It's not just about her lovely breasts. I like to think they're real bye. Most women would not go for breast implants that big. Plastic surgeons might even advise against that size, given the strain it can put on your back.
She was totally flat-chested before. She's gotten implants in addition to gaining weight.
Facially, I don't think she's attractive at all. Although it is nice to see an actress in Hollywood embrace her pale skin.
|by Anonymous||reply 92||03/22/2013|
It's not a "perfectly healthy weight" if you have to do drugs and/or develop an eating disorder to maintain it.
|by Anonymous||reply 93||03/22/2013|
First World problem.
|by Anonymous||reply 94||03/22/2013|
[quote]It's not a "perfectly healthy weight" if you have to do drugs and/or develop an eating disorder to maintain it.
Most don't have eating disorders or take drugs. They just diet.
|by Anonymous||reply 95||03/22/2013|
Plus, what R94 said.
|by Anonymous||reply 96||03/22/2013|
She is bovine.
|by Anonymous||reply 97||03/22/2013|
R81, she's a FAT FUCK.
|by Anonymous||reply 98||03/22/2013|
R91 - Most Hollywood actresses are too thin, but Christina has had too much lunch. She does have gorgeous skin.
|by Anonymous||reply 99||03/22/2013|
Most Americans today have a distorted view of what is a healthy body size. Hendricks is overweight, look at her thighs in R81's link
Sort of like how their taste-buds are distorted and have become accustomed to food the is unnaturally sweet.
|by Anonymous||reply 100||03/22/2013|
Whoa r100. Those pics are not good, she is huge and she has ham hock arms too.
|by Anonymous||reply 101||03/22/2013|
Whilst at my link at R99, I saw Mariah Carey far slimmer than Hendricks.
|by Anonymous||reply 102||03/22/2013|
She looks better in R100 link.
|by Anonymous||reply 103||03/22/2013|
R92, where are the photos it her flat chested? If she really was flat chested and went for this size then she really is dumb and her plastic surgeon totally irresponsible.
Admittedly I've really only seen her in Mad men where she is usually well covered and wearing a lot of underwear.
Straight men really do like big breasts though it isn't usually a deal breaker. Women like CH and Nigella Lawson really are considered gorgeous. It isn't just some media myth. They could both maybe lose a kilo or two for health reasons but have such pretty faces and nicely curvy bodies this doesn't detract. Is every overweight/obese woman considered attractive therefore? Of course not.
R92 you've selected possibly the most beautiful Hollywood actress ever to argue your case - Grace Kelly. CH isn't as beautiful but then who is?
|by Anonymous||reply 104||03/22/2013|
here she is before and after. She had tits, just not huge ones.
|by Anonymous||reply 105||03/22/2013|
Wow r105 she was kind of cute before, had a little Lauren Holly thing going on. Now she's gross. Did she just get big tits so she could excuse getting obese? Like how Jessica Simpson got pregnant again to get off her crappy weight watchers diet.
|by Anonymous||reply 106||03/22/2013|
She's nowhere near obese for fucks sake. Dramaqueens.
She is quite a lot heavier than when she was young though, so of course her boobs would be bigger. Boobs are just fat. That dress in the after pic is just gross, I don't think her tits look that insane normally. Just saying. She could have easily have a boob job too.
|by Anonymous||reply 107||03/22/2013|
sorry but that pic at r81 is an obese woman. This is her without girdles.
|by Anonymous||reply 108||03/22/2013|
I bet her uncorralled boobs hit the top of her feet.
|by Anonymous||reply 109||03/22/2013|
[quote]R92 you've selected possibly the most beautiful Hollywood actress ever to argue your case - Grace Kelly. CH isn't as beautiful but then who is?
Yes, that was unfair. Beauty's in the eye of the beholder but I just don't think the woman's face in R105's link is pretty in fact at times she can look downright homely.
A good way to judge someone's looks is to imagine them without makeup and bald. Somehow I think people are judging Hendricks looks on her overall image and that fact the the media and other people keep saying she's beautiful.
I'm not sure what it is, maybe it's the manly chin. Here's a photo below, admittedly not the best angle but it shows her without that pouty pose she seems to be pulling in every other picture:
|by Anonymous||reply 111||03/22/2013|
I'm just not seeing the supposed beauty everyone keeps talking about.
This one's fairer, head on angle:
|by Anonymous||reply 112||03/22/2013|
She had a nice voluptuous shape the first season of Mad Men. But she's gained about five pounds each season.
|by Anonymous||reply 113||03/22/2013|
Ugh r11, she's got those little baked bean teeth. Like George and Jerry's coach in high school
|by Anonymous||reply 114||03/22/2013|
Sorry I meant r111
|by Anonymous||reply 115||03/22/2013|
She was so beautiful and lithe as "Saffron" in those Firefly episodes (although that was 10 years ago.).
|by Anonymous||reply 116||03/22/2013|
How did she gain such a massive amount of weight? She seems to have put on about fifty pounds, what did her agent think? Wasn't she worried for her career. She is very big for an actress.
|by Anonymous||reply 117||03/22/2013|
The weight gain has been gradual.
|by Anonymous||reply 118||03/22/2013|
R111 & R112 is my online doppelganger. I concur.
When she's not contorting her visage in that pose by splaying her lips and lifting the cheeks, she's plain as dog shit in the face. She has that southern trailer park demeanor and features, Think Reba McIntyre. The Judd mother.
If we're talking gorgeous heavy weights then Delta Burke would fit the bill. Now that is some face. She's a beauty on any level. Not this fly by night Tits McGee and her makeup job.
|by Anonymous||reply 119||03/22/2013|
You're doppelganger here, R119 and I also agree with you on Delta Burke, she had beautiful cat-like eyes.
|by Anonymous||reply 120||03/22/2013|
My link failed. Imagine beautiful eyes.
|by Anonymous||reply 121||03/22/2013|
Doppel, your link doesn't work
|by Anonymous||reply 122||03/22/2013|
I'll look in the mirror -and see you.
|by Anonymous||reply 123||03/22/2013|
Look at this link... if it works...
|by Anonymous||reply 124||03/23/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 125||03/23/2013|
Delta was gorgeous.
|by Anonymous||reply 126||03/23/2013|
124, dare I say Delta is even more beautiful than Vivien Lee in Gone With The Wind? Her eye shape is catlike, almondesque.
|by Anonymous||reply 127||03/23/2013|
Holy Hell!! A plastic surgery dizasstur! Now that's a sin.
|by Anonymous||reply 128||03/23/2013|
I think she looks lovely r128
|by Anonymous||reply 129||03/23/2013|
Cheek implants aren't for everyone. Especially one whose weight fluctuates. She looks more akin to Roseanne before her botched surgery. RoRo had her cat shaped eyes erased or were they just squinty? Don't remember.
|by Anonymous||reply 130||03/23/2013|
Delta would've been perfect as Elizabeth Taylor in a biopic in the early eighties.
Delta has Type II diabetes, which might explain her face's puffiness in recent years.
When Delta gained weight during "Designing Women" the media were quite nasty. Yet Christina is being applauded for her "curvy" figure.
|by Anonymous||reply 131||03/23/2013|
You're absolutely right r131. I remember they even had that (very special) episode where she overheard people calling her fat from a bathroom stall or something, to address that she did know she was getting shit about her weight. I don't remember her being half as big and she was a great actress. That's weird and I am glad you brought it up because you would think it would be less acceptable now but I guess not.
|by Anonymous||reply 132||03/23/2013|
I disagree but I'd certainly like to hear from Miss Hendricks why she thinks it's rude.
In any event, I love her.
|by Anonymous||reply 133||03/23/2013|
If I were Christina, I would find being called full-figured tedious and boring from hearing it constantly. Being an accomplished person - and she is - and constantly being linked to a physical attribute is always demoralizing, no matter what that physical attribute is. But I would like to think I'd have the presence of mind to not confuse the annoyance with with rudeness. She is full-figured. And proof there is nothing wrong with it.
|by Anonymous||reply 134||03/23/2013|
[quote]If I were Christina, I would find being called full-figured tedious and boring from hearing it constantly. Being an accomplished person - and she is - and constantly being linked to a physical attribute is always demoralizing, no matter what that physical attribute is. But I would like to think I'd have the presence of mind to not confuse the annoyance with with rudeness. She is full-figured. And proof there is nothing wrong with it.
She encourages it. Full figured is the politest way to describe her, she's overweight.
|by Anonymous||reply 135||03/23/2013|
There's no way around it. Full figured doesn't really cut it for this doll. Grotesque is the only word.
|by Anonymous||reply 136||03/23/2013|
Wow. r129's link is TRAGIC.
|by Anonymous||reply 137||03/23/2013|
Hendricks has a plain face. I always roll my eyes when people say she's beautiful.
|by Anonymous||reply 138||03/23/2013|
She also looks much better as Joan than as Christina.
|by Anonymous||reply 139||03/23/2013|
She may look better as Joan but her shelf precedes her into every scene. Not a pretty sight, and I would think she has trouble walking almost anywhere.
|by Anonymous||reply 140||03/23/2013|
She looks better here.
|by Anonymous||reply 141||03/29/2013|
Better than what? Puh leese.
|by Anonymous||reply 142||03/29/2013|
Better than in some recent pics.
|by Anonymous||reply 143||03/31/2013|
She looked even bigger on the new Mad Men episode.
|by Anonymous||reply 144||04/11/2013|
I always thought full-figured was a polite way of saying fat. She is certainly not fat. That being said, I always referred to her as the lady from Capital Knockers City. Is that better?
|by Anonymous||reply 145||04/11/2013|
She's not quite fat, but she is pushing fat. She is now past voluptuous.
|by Anonymous||reply 146||04/11/2013|
I'm a straight chick and I found myself getting turned on my R pic post.
|by Anonymous||reply 147||04/11/2013|
Can anyone take her seriously either as an actress or as tits on wheels?
|by Anonymous||reply 148||04/11/2013|
She'll miss being called full figured when they're labelling her WEHT?
|by Anonymous||reply 149||04/11/2013|
LOL for R147 I'm a gay dude and I too found myself turned on by that pic.
|by Anonymous||reply 150||04/11/2013|
She has huge fake implants like Dolly Parton and she's fat. What does she expect?
|by Anonymous||reply 151||04/11/2013|
Filming the Ryan Gosling movie
|by Anonymous||reply 152||05/09/2013|
She's pretty and a good actress, but I hate the character of Joan. She's cuntier than Betty truth be told.
|by Anonymous||reply 153||05/09/2013|
Joan is sharp tongued, but she's not whiny like Betty. She's also managed to make something of herself.
|by Anonymous||reply 154||05/09/2013|
It's a good thing Christina's got the Joan role going for her. It's the best she's gonna get, I'm afraid. If only she wasn't so grotesque. Her talent isn't full-figured at all.
|by Anonymous||reply 155||05/10/2013|
She must have the world's best publicist:
|by Anonymous||reply 156||05/10/2013|
She has an unusual body. Her face and her limbs are a lot slimmer than her torso.
|by Anonymous||reply 157||05/11/2013|
ok, is lard ass acceptable?
And those boobs are just ridiculous.
|by Anonymous||reply 158||05/11/2013|
Just Damn, r81.
|by Anonymous||reply 159||05/11/2013|
Her face is so beautiful. How does she not get carb face or double chins?
|by Anonymous||reply 160||05/11/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 161||05/11/2013|
How much more weight must she gain before the media start calling her fat?:
|by Anonymous||reply 162||05/11/2013|
Don't bother. She's there.
|by Anonymous||reply 163||05/11/2013|
Actually, I think it's a real disservice to the nation's health to call fat women "full-figured" or "curvy" -- they're fat, maybe even obese, and if they don't have Type 2 diabetes, joint pain and heart disease, they will.
|by Anonymous||reply 164||05/11/2013|
She's definitively chubby.
|by Anonymous||reply 165||05/11/2013|
She's built like Tyler Perry's Medea
|by Anonymous||reply 166||05/11/2013|
[quote]Don't bother. She's there.
Of course she's there, but the media are still being complimentary to her, whilst suggesting that women half her size [italic]are[/italic] fat.
|by Anonymous||reply 167||05/15/2013|
The media should stop obsessing over women's looks. It's perverted and pathological the way women are constantly being scrutinized. Of course, it's a savvy tool to powertrip women but I am bored with the fucking nagging in regards to women's appearance.
|by Anonymous||reply 168||05/15/2013|
[quote]The media should stop obsessing over women's looks. It's perverted and pathological the way women are constantly being scrutinized. Of course, it's a savvy tool to powertrip women but I am bored with the fucking nagging in regards to women's appearance.
That sounds somewhat reasonable. But Hendricks is the one pushing everyone to talk about her "curvy", "womanly" figure, so they don't call her fat.
|by Anonymous||reply 169||05/15/2013|
It seems to be the way to promote this show. They talk about her tits and Jon Hamm's huge cock.
|by Anonymous||reply 170||05/15/2013|
I like her curves - unlike many here - but admit that she is overweight (not obese). I think she gets away with it because the weight hasn't gone to her face. Anyone obese claiming her as one of their own, is having themselves on.
I still think she is healthier looking than some of the stick insect actors around the place.
|by Anonymous||reply 171||05/15/2013|
[quote]I like her curves - unlike many here - but admit that she is overweight (not obese). I think she gets away with it because the weight hasn't gone to her face. Anyone obese claiming her as one of their own, is having themselves on.
Yes, but at times she does look at the heavier range of the overweight category, see R81's link. Constance McCashin has a better figure than her, despite her infamous love of junk food:
|by Anonymous||reply 172||05/15/2013|
Yes, R172, but I have to work out like a fucking *bitch* to keep my svelte figure.
|by Anonymous||reply 173||05/15/2013|
What if we just call her a great big fat person.
|by Anonymous||reply 174||05/15/2013|
Christina Hendricks is a human roach nest!
|by Anonymous||reply 175||05/15/2013|
But ya are, Blanche.
|by Anonymous||reply 176||05/15/2013|
Describe her to me. I know what would be first on my list.
|by Anonymous||reply 177||05/15/2013|
She'd totally rock the cheese ball contest at michfest.
|by Anonymous||reply 178||05/16/2013|
She looks so matronly:
|by Anonymous||reply 179||05/16/2013|
So matronly...and so grotesque.
|by Anonymous||reply 180||05/16/2013|
She's lost considerable weight.
|by Anonymous||reply 181||08/10/2013|
"Curvy" is a shape, not a size. Marilyn Monroe was absolutely tiny-- she hips were 36 inches-- but her waist hip ratio was the definition of curvy.
Hendricks is just fat.
|by Anonymous||reply 182||08/10/2013|
r182, you have to factor in the bust. Hendricks is (was?) busty.
|by Anonymous||reply 183||08/10/2013|
Marilyn fluctuated, but you are right, she was curvy based on her proportions.
Christina is curvy herself. She has a relatively small waist for her bust and hips. She's also no longer fat based on the recent picture.
|by Anonymous||reply 184||08/10/2013|
She's craftily dressed in black. Her tits still precede her into any room. And now she just looks weird.
|by Anonymous||reply 185||08/10/2013|
Look at how slim her waist is, R185. She's lost weight.
|by Anonymous||reply 186||08/10/2013|
I think MM's hips were 36 at her smallest. They were not 36 in Some Like It Hot or Niagra.
|by Anonymous||reply 187||08/10/2013|
She claims her boobs are real.
|by Anonymous||reply 188||08/10/2013|
In news that will please the yearnings of many men, Christina Hendricks is set to play a stripper in the film adaptation of Gillian Flynn's best-selling thriller "Dark Places." The "Mad Men" actress joins Charlize Theron, Chloe Moretz, Nicholas Hoult and Corey Stoll in the Gilles Paquet-Brenner ("Sarah's Key," "Pretty Things") film.
Hendricks, who is no stranger to attracting buzz, plays Krissi Cates, who years ago accused a man (Stoll) of being a child molester. Krissi is down on her luck and must address secrets from her past that have implications for the accused man's older sister (Theron).
"Dark Places" marks one of two acclaimed Flynn novels to ink a movie deal recently. "Gone Girl," a 2012 best-seller, will receive a David Fincher adaptation, with Rosamund Pike and Ben Affleck in the lead roles.
|by Anonymous||reply 189||08/31/2013|
Even slim Christina still looks grotesque.
|by Anonymous||reply 190||08/31/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 191||08/31/2013|
I feel bad for this girl. People discuss her figure and her shape so much, but it really has nothing to do with her. Men love to tell anyone who will listen that they think she's hot, because it's a way of bragging that they aren't shallow because they'd fuck a fat girl. And women love to applaud her full-figured shape because they think it will help them to better accept their own physical flaws. Because she's overweight, people think it's okay talk about her in a strictly sexual sense. But if she had an athletic body, and people said they same things about her, it would be perceived as being as creepy and exploitative as it is. Not to mention a weird form of pity.
But, most of all, if anyone gains a little weight, the LAST thing they want people to discuss is their weight. And that's all anybody discusses about her.
|by Anonymous||reply 192||08/31/2013|
i WISH someone would call me "full figured!"
|by Anonymous||reply 193||08/31/2013|
Let's face it, Christina. As the years go on, calling you full-figured would be a high compliment.
|by Anonymous||reply 194||09/01/2013|
What kind of weirdo are you r192? Sure, some women might enjoy calling a heavier woman sexy in order to feel better about their own weight. (Though the ONLY celeb I see that working for right now is Hendricks, actually.) But there isn't a single men in this universe who pretends to lust after the sex bomb secretary from Mad Men so that they don't seem shallow. Are you insane?
|by Anonymous||reply 195||09/01/2013|
She's fortunate in having a thin face.
|by Anonymous||reply 196||09/01/2013|
[all posts by ham-fisted troll a removed.]
|by Anonymous||reply 197||09/01/2013|
R197 - She is talented. She's been able to make Joan into a complex character.
|by Anonymous||reply 198||09/01/2013|
I'm not saying they're pretending, R195. I'm saying they're more vocal about their lust for her than they would be with someone of a more conventional shape because they think that makes them seem more admirable.
|by Anonymous||reply 199||09/02/2013|
Or maybe they like big boobs, R199
|by Anonymous||reply 200||09/02/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 201||09/07/2013|
I'd call that a hell of a lot more than full-figured. I'd call that wearing a tablecloth to enhance her tittays. Poor baby.
|by Anonymous||reply 202||09/07/2013|
At least this outfit works with her figure.
|by Anonymous||reply 203||09/23/2013|
I'd prefer her naked body to Claire Danes skinny and gross looking body! Hendricks has the perfect fuck body.
|by Anonymous||reply 204||09/23/2013|
Somewhere right in between Claire and Christina would be nice.
|by Anonymous||reply 205||09/23/2013|
Honey, you should consider being called full-figured as a full-blown compliment. Take it in the spirit it's intended.
|by Anonymous||reply 206||09/24/2013|
Christina carries it better than Kirstie.
|by Anonymous||reply 207||09/24/2013|
I dated Tom Irwin right after his breakup with Christina. The girl is a total bitch. She used him hardcore. I think she's great on Mad Men, but she is typical Hollywood: soulless.
|by Anonymous||reply 208||09/24/2013|
This bitch has been 37 for 200 years. God damn.
|by Anonymous||reply 209||09/24/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 210||09/24/2013|
And her cup size is M, for MAMMOTH.
|by Anonymous||reply 211||09/24/2013|
Her size worked in the early days of Mad Men. Now she's carrying too much weight and it doesn't look good anymore.
She's not a blimp but she is fat. The industry standards for the industry she chooses to work in actually do matter.
She looks much prettier in person, really gorgeous.
|by Anonymous||reply 212||09/24/2013|
She's put on at least 20 lbs since Mad men started.
|by Anonymous||reply 213||09/24/2013|
She's like Sandra....from Confederate Northern Virginia where they still worship Robert E. Lee.
Yes, she's hot and beautiful but like Sandra, she's hiding A LOT (this is all conjecture, I'm sure).
|by Anonymous||reply 214||09/24/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 215||09/24/2013|
Here's a younger Christina in a commercial.
|by Anonymous||reply 216||11/17/2013|
Jeez, have never seen her before. I googled her, she's a life support for two buckets of silicone.
|by Anonymous||reply 217||11/17/2013|
R217 - You've never seen her before?
|by Anonymous||reply 218||11/17/2013|
No 218, I don't have cable. Breaking Bad, Sopranos etc., I've never seen them.
|by Anonymous||reply 219||11/17/2013|
She is on Mad Men. But she's been talked about a lot.
|by Anonymous||reply 220||11/17/2013|
And the bitch denies her udders are implants.
|by Anonymous||reply 221||11/17/2013|
Bitch should be lucky anyone finds her flabby, pasty, flat-ass attractive at all.
|by Anonymous||reply 222||11/17/2013|
Hard to believe in that commercial she once looked human (forget full figured).
|by Anonymous||reply 223||11/17/2013|
She looked great in Firefly.
|by Anonymous||reply 224||11/17/2013|
She also looked fine and was terrific in the 2011 NY Philharmonic production of Company with Neil Patrick Harris, which finally got aired on PBS a few weeks ago. She played the dumb airline hostess April really well, although she did strip down to her slip and bra, and, well, she probably shouldn't have.
|by Anonymous||reply 225||11/19/2013|
She's a good actress.
|by Anonymous||reply 226||11/19/2013|
She's still a house, good actress or not. Christina, honey, I think you should get used to "full-figured gal" and take it as it's meant: a high compliment.
|by Anonymous||reply 227||11/20/2013|
I don't know what her problem is. I have her figure (although my E cup size is natural)and I love it. So do the men--and women.
|by Anonymous||reply 228||11/20/2013|
R228. Are you a man or a woman?
|by Anonymous||reply 229||11/20/2013|
I know, Christina. I feel the same way when people talk about my giant, long, thick penis straining to escape my pants .
|by Anonymous||reply 230||11/20/2013|
A man with an E cup size?!
|by Anonymous||reply 231||11/20/2013|
She'd look better if she lost 20-30 lbs.
|by Anonymous||reply 232||11/20/2013|
R231. These days you can't be sure. It never hurts to ask! LOL!
|by Anonymous||reply 233||11/20/2013|
Big Tina's interviewer's rebuttal:
[bold]Hollywood's voluptuous beauty was offended? Go (full) figure...
Last week I dropped the F-bomb and it went global. No, I didn't swear - the international media storm was because I called the Mad Men actress Christina Hendricks 'full-figured'.
I asked: 'You have been an inspiration as a full-figured woman; what is the most inspiring story that you can remember?' It seemed inoffensive to me, so I was shocked when she refused to answer the question and told me it was 'just rude'.
I was not intending to be rude. In fact, I think she is one of the sexiest women on the planet. Indeed, I would die for some of those curves! But no one can deny that Hendricks is voluptuous and, whether she likes it or not, she has become a poster girl for full-figured women - especially when considered next to your typical size zero Hollywood actress. Advertisement
I hope she realises that refusing to own up to the fact that she is full-figured only breeds more insecurity on body acceptance.
Unfortunately, she has now made the term full-figured a dirty word.
In response to my story, the editor-in-chief of the US-based Plus Model Magazine, Madeline Jones, told me she was disappointed by Hendricks's reaction. 'I was personally offended by it. She is a curvy woman and she is fuller than most women in Hollywood, so therefore she is a role model to plus-size women,' she said.
'She is a role model to 65 per cent of American women and millions around the world. What a powerful statement she could have made. She should be humbled that she can inspire so many people. The fact that she made such a big deal about it shows truth about how she feels and how she feels about her plus-size fans.'
Curiously, on the same day as my interview, Hendricks answered questions from News Ltd, including 'Have you ever felt a time in your career that you have had to change just to fit a model type' and 'Have you ever thought 'Oh gee, should I lose weight?'' She answered: 'It's important to embrace who you are and celebrate who you are and we are all completely different and I think that's gorgeous.'
Exactly right! For the record, full-figured is defined as 'amply proportioned', it does not mean fat or obese. It is a term to describe buxom and shapely, with broad hips and lots of sensuous, womanly curves as opposed to an androgynous waif-like figure. To me, this is political correctness gone mad.
So why did she take offence? No issues or topics were off limits for the interview and in my weekly Date with Kate column I often discuss weight, health and fitness. Her publicity people had approached me as she was being paid a significant sum of money to promote a brand of glasses in Australia.
As a journalist, my role is to ask what our readers would like to know. Her shapely appearance is an important part of her appeal, so it would have been unprofessional not to ask the question - albeit politely and with the best intentions. When I asked Kim Kardashian - who is also regarded as voluptuous in Hollywood terms - a similar question, she replied: 'I feel excited that young girls look up to me and I'm not your typical stick-skinny girl.'
Hendricks later told The Sun-Herald that she prefers her shape to be described as 'feminine'. But does that mean that I'm not feminine because I'm slight?
Since referring to Hendricks as full- figured, I have had countless abusive tweets, emails and comments about my weight. But I choose not to take offence. Yes, there are plenty of things I would change about my body. I would love bigger breasts and I'd kill for long legs. But I am proud of my body because I know that I eat well and I am healthy.
Above all, I celebrate women of all shapes and sizes.
|by Anonymous||reply 234||12/05/2013|
Link for above:
|by Anonymous||reply 235||12/05/2013|
Closing bold tag.
|by Anonymous||reply 236||12/05/2013|
[quote]And the bitch denies her udders are implants.
Her breasts are big because she gained so much weight. They're probably quite saggy without support. I have a friend who's built just like her. A good bra makes all the difference.
Look at what Lohan's (now obviously real) large breast looks like from the side. That's clearly a natural (and premature) sag.
|by Anonymous||reply 237||12/05/2013|
[bold]Bold over, yet?[/bold]
|by Anonymous||reply 238||12/05/2013|
In this picture.....
|by Anonymous||reply 239||12/05/2013|
And this one.....
You can see how Christina would be a great WW
|by Anonymous||reply 240||12/05/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 241||12/12/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 242||12/12/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 243||12/12/2013|
She is gorgeous.
|by Anonymous||reply 244||12/12/2013|
[quote]She is gorgeous.
It's "ginormous", sweetie.
|by Anonymous||reply 245||12/12/2013|
Full-figured is putting it mildly, and kindly.
|by Anonymous||reply 246||12/12/2013|
Back fat #2
|by Anonymous||reply 247||12/12/2013|
Big Tina endorses everything. She looks like a gal who enjoys her margarine:
|by Anonymous||reply 248||12/12/2013|
Give her a fucking break, she is a hot mess, but she was a scream in the Neil Patrick Harris version of Company, and should better more comedy turns.
|by Anonymous||reply 249||12/12/2013|
Rose Mcgowan's fat little sister
|by Anonymous||reply 250||12/12/2013|
R220 - She does not have the WW look.
|by Anonymous||reply 251||12/12/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 252||12/15/2013|
She does look gorgeous. Even in photos revealing backfat, the entire rest of her looks amazing. She's thick and beautiful, lets accept it and move on.
|by Anonymous||reply 253||12/15/2013|
R252 - That's actually flattering. Who is with her?
|by Anonymous||reply 254||12/15/2013|
|by Anonymous||reply 255||12/16/2013|
Why does no one remark on her resemblance to Gabourney Sidibe?
|by Anonymous||reply 256||01/15/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 257||02/06/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 258||02/06/2014|
Have never understood the obsession with this sow. Bad dye job and her breasts are disgusting. Massive mounds of shapeless fat, squished together and overflowing under a too-tight top. Maybe quantity over quality matters to straight men, but I've seen good tits and these ain't good tits. These are fat girl tits.
|by Anonymous||reply 259||02/06/2014|
[quote]Plump is ok if they bring a lot of value
We're talking about women like they were steaks at the local Kroger now?
|by Anonymous||reply 260||02/06/2014|
Remember she has BMs the size of squirrels.
|by Anonymous||reply 261||02/06/2014|
She is full-figured and gorgeous. This is such a tedious thread. Let it go.
I love how you Americans obsess over certain celebrities being "fat". The truth is that more than 50% of your population is overweight. Not sure why you take it out on this woman or Jennifer Lawrence (who basically has the perfect figure) when there are millions of truly overweight men and women you could target.
|by Anonymous||reply 262||02/06/2014|
Her younger self had blondish hair and a normal-sized bust. If she regrets the attention her artificial hair and breasts generate, she should return to her more natural features.
|by Anonymous||reply 263||02/06/2014|
Better than calling you fat bitch-chi-sha... go run 'long now...
|by Anonymous||reply 264||02/06/2014|
There are far worse things she could be called
|by Anonymous||reply 265||02/06/2014|
Let Tina alone! What's done can't be undone and she'll just have to live with all the augmentation! And so will we.
|by Anonymous||reply 266||02/06/2014|
Probably best to say nothing then ! Calling her 'full figured' is being 'kind'. She's borderline Zaftig. Really. Give her a few more years and you'll see. PLUS, truth is the ideal for the past 40,50 years has been women that are no bigger than a size 8.
|by Anonymous||reply 267||02/06/2014|
R262 - Christina is several sizes larger than Jennifer Lawrence.
|by Anonymous||reply 268||02/06/2014|
I love that one...
|by Anonymous||reply 269||02/06/2014|
Zaftig fits Christina.
|by Anonymous||reply 270||02/06/2014|
Call her a whale
|by Anonymous||reply 271||02/06/2014|
Gut at 0:25
|by Anonymous||reply 272||02/09/2014|
I like the glasses R272
|by Anonymous||reply 273||02/09/2014|
Funny thing is, in recent photos (last several months), she appears to have lost about 15-20 pounds--maybe not from her boobs but from her midsection, and looks much better. In that last photo upthread she looks way thinner than last year's show (including her face). Maybe calling her full-figured has actually worked...
|by Anonymous||reply 274||02/09/2014|
She has lost some weight and is getting back her shape.
|by Anonymous||reply 275||02/09/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 276||02/23/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 277||02/23/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 278||02/23/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 279||02/23/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 280||02/23/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 281||02/23/2014|
Pot Belly 2
|by Anonymous||reply 282||02/23/2014|
"Side gut". How's that for her nickname?
|by Anonymous||reply 283||02/23/2014|
[italic]Although Hendricks had to be dragged away from the hot dog stand, she promised to return.[/italic]
|by Anonymous||reply 284||02/23/2014|
That before picture is hot! The perfect woman. Shame she didn't get famous earlier.
|by Anonymous||reply 285||02/23/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 286||02/23/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 287||02/23/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 288||02/23/2014|
R279 looks like early in Mad Men's run.
|by Anonymous||reply 289||02/23/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 290||02/23/2014|
She looked slimmer at Sundance this year:
|by Anonymous||reply 291||02/23/2014|
The size of squirrels, people!
|by Anonymous||reply 292||02/24/2014|
She looks best at the weight @ r279
|by Anonymous||reply 293||02/24/2014|
^^ Yeah, WHAT are you going on about?
It's unfortunate that she'd understand a comment about being 'full-figured' to be negative. I sensed it as a nod to her having delicious curves--a welcome sight, from a purely lustful perspective. But, I do understand it was kind of dim for the interviewers to have not worded it more carefully.
And I [italic]love[/italic] a girl in glasses.
...Here's a heartbreaking Mad Men scene, when Joan's good friend Carol admits that she loves her.
|by Anonymous||reply 294||02/24/2014|
R259 = very gay man
|by Anonymous||reply 295||02/24/2014|
Who said "I'm so over you" in 1960.
|by Anonymous||reply 296||02/24/2014|
All right, you're not full figured, You are FAT!
|by Anonymous||reply 297||02/24/2014|
Pic from a month ago. Not slim, but not bad.
|by Anonymous||reply 298||02/24/2014|
There's STILL an expedition lost inside those sagging, droopy, oversized meat curtains!
|by Anonymous||reply 299||02/24/2014|
Squirrels, I tell you - SQUIRRELS!!
|by Anonymous||reply 300||02/24/2014|
R298 Elizabeth Moss's face is terrifying in that pic.
|by Anonymous||reply 301||02/24/2014|
[quote][R298] Elizabeth Moss's face is terrifying in that pic.
Julianna Margulies looks awful in that picture with Tom Hanks. She took the zero percent body fat a tad too far.
|by Anonymous||reply 302||02/24/2014|
"morbidly obese" would be more accurate
|by Anonymous||reply 303||02/24/2014|
Holy cow, R299. You are an off-the-chart 'mo.
As for us gay girls, [italic]I'm getting that tingle in my tummy[/italic] just looking at these photos of her.
|by Anonymous||reply 304||02/24/2014|
Elisabeth looks overweight too, and she does not pull it off well.
|by Anonymous||reply 305||02/24/2014|
[quote]Elisabeth looks overweight too, and she does not pull it off well.
I saw Elisabeth M. in NYC last summer when she was shooting a film and she does not look overweight. She looked petite in person. It is crazy how much weight a camera adds.
|by Anonymous||reply 306||02/25/2014|
Camera or no camera, it's completely obvious that E. Moss is slender. Some people are just insane.
|by Anonymous||reply 307||02/25/2014|
Hendricks is a natural blonde.
|by Anonymous||reply 308||03/06/2014|
No joke - SQUIRRELS. Seriously.
|by Anonymous||reply 309||03/07/2014|
Tipping me over in a field is even ruder!
|by Anonymous||reply 310||03/08/2014|
What's this squirrel shit?
|by Anonymous||reply 311||03/08/2014|
Big Tina looked fatter than ever in her full-figured interview:
|by Anonymous||reply 312||03/12/2014|
Loud prints don't work on big women like Christina:
|by Anonymous||reply 313||03/27/2014|
No they don't.
|by Anonymous||reply 314||03/27/2014|
Big Tina's outfit from the interview:
|by Anonymous||reply 315||03/29/2014|
I actually like it R315
|by Anonymous||reply 316||03/29/2014|
Are they really as big as SQUIRRELS?
|by Anonymous||reply 317||03/29/2014|
Timeline of her weight gain:
|by Anonymous||reply 318||04/09/2014|
Nothing about Hendricks is natural as this 1999 photo proves.
|by Anonymous||reply 319||04/14/2014|
That's some photo, R319! Thanks for posting it.
|by Anonymous||reply 320||04/14/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 321||04/14/2014|
R319 - She's not flat chested there.
|by Anonymous||reply 322||04/14/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 323||04/16/2014|
How about "Facunt" or "C-Barge"?
|by Anonymous||reply 324||04/28/2014|
[quote]How about "Facunt" or "C-Barge"?
Appropriate. But Hendricks official DL designation is Big Tina Hendricks or Fat Sow Christina Hendricks.
See AnnE for for Anne Hathaway whilst Anne Fakeaway or Anne Fauxhumilityway also work she's already been given an official name.
|by Anonymous||reply 325||05/01/2014|
She's looking thinner on Mad Men.
|by Anonymous||reply 326||05/01/2014|
[all posts by childish idiot removed]
|by Anonymous||reply 327||05/01/2014|
Are they really as big as squirrels?
|by Anonymous||reply 328||05/02/2014|
Yes, as big as squirrels.
|by Anonymous||reply 329||05/02/2014|
Just saw her in "God's Pocket," where her breasts looked beyond ridiculous. They were practically up to her neck and nothing on her moved naturally. I watch a LOT of indie movies with a lot of different body types and never even notice when someone doesn't have a Hollywood figure... until Christina.
|by Anonymous||reply 330||05/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 331||05/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 332||05/08/2014|
Christina Hendricks: 'Calling me full-figured is just true.'
I fixed that for you.
|by Anonymous||reply 333||05/08/2014|
I thought she looked good in R331's pic.
|by Anonymous||reply 334||05/08/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 335||05/09/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 336||05/09/2014|
Too fussy. Makes her look even fatter.
|by Anonymous||reply 337||05/15/2014|
That's a good pic R337
|by Anonymous||reply 338||05/15/2014|
Is it true she's really good in God's Pocket?
|by Anonymous||reply 339||05/15/2014|
Mel Brooks: "Calling me Jewish is just rude"
|by Anonymous||reply 340||05/22/2014|
She looked much slimmer in the last Mad Men where Bob Benson proposes.
|by Anonymous||reply 341||05/22/2014|
She looked mammoth last season.
|by Anonymous||reply 342||05/22/2014|
She looks like the fat office frau:
|by Anonymous||reply 343||05/28/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 344||05/28/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 345||05/28/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 346||06/01/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 347||06/01/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 348||06/01/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 349||06/01/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 350||06/01/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 351||06/01/2014|
Full figured is better than overweight cow!
|by Anonymous||reply 352||06/01/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 353||06/01/2014|
Good lord are those huge knockers real?
She looks pregnant in the belly area. Unless she has stopped wearing Spanx.
|by Anonymous||reply 354||06/01/2014|
She looks good here.
|by Anonymous||reply 355||06/04/2014|
On the Tonight Show. Definitively slimmer, and looking gorgeous.
|by Anonymous||reply 356||06/24/2014|
New photos. Still fat.
|by Anonymous||reply 357||07/19/2014|
No, R355, she looks huge. Her face and arms are still but her body's huge. She isn't even curvy. Look at the photos above. Her waist is bigger than her husband's and barely goes in. She's Spanxed to the max in every outfit. Can we see a photo of her where she isn't covered up and in shapewear. She's overweight.
|by Anonymous||reply 358||07/19/2014|
She looks the same size as always in that gold skirt ^^. If you think she isn't overweight take a look in the mirror. She has a gut.
|by Anonymous||reply 359||07/19/2014|
Her waist is about 30 inches with girdle. It might be smaller than her hips and boobs but there's no denying her hips are wide.
|by Anonymous||reply 360||07/19/2014|
Her publicist works over-time to promote her "curviness". She's just a great big fat person. She should be thankful no one called her "stocky" or "big boned".
|by Anonymous||reply 361||07/19/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 362||07/19/2014|
I'm an ass man and big tit fan...but some curious reason she does nothing for me. On paper that hip-to-waist ratio may perhaps equal classic hourglass; in reality, however, it's the waist numbers that matter most. Hendricks waist is far too thick and merely makes her upper body, shoulders, hips, and overall appearance robust or matronly.
Academic studies have found that by altering a models picture by narrowing just the waist to achieve the perfect ratio 0.7(IIRC); or alternatively only altering the hips (broadening) but leaving waist unaltered..the smaller waist wins virtually every time among males studied. Moreover, guys will specify a preference for an smaller waist than the standard 0.7 ideal.
In my opinion that real ideal sexy curvy woman is a mixture of the delicate and plushly fleshy. Christina, however, is in BBW territory. Not that that's a bad thing. In keeping with the shows era, I think "curvy" should be reserved for classic Gina Lollobrigidas, Sophia Lorens, Marilyn? (in her nude pics she has no ass or tits to speak of).
Hendicks's lustrous luminescent alabaster skin IS kinda hot tho.
|by Anonymous||reply 363||07/19/2014|
She's a top heavy hourglass.
|by Anonymous||reply 364||07/19/2014|
WTF? Is some brazen cad copping a feel in R355? LOL
|by Anonymous||reply 365||07/19/2014|
That's hysterical R365 and it looks like a woman's hand.
Maybe a randy lesbian?
|by Anonymous||reply 366||07/19/2014|
You must be at least kinda gay, R363, if Christina Hendricks does nothing for you.
In her 1960's Joan get-up, she is unquestionably sexy.
|by Anonymous||reply 367||07/19/2014|
R365 good question.
|by Anonymous||reply 368||07/19/2014|
I like her character on Mad Men (although I did not watch the previous season because Winer lost me and I can't be bothered if he can't be bothered), and in general I think she is a good actress. However, she seems to be in the most shit indie movies that she does over her hiatus. Except for Drive, which she had a minor role, she cannot seem to get in any decent movies. I hope that changes once Mad Men is over next year.
I will say that I see her having a film career over John Hamm. He does not have that elusive "it" factor for the big screen.
|by Anonymous||reply 369||07/19/2014|
Christina in Company (2013). I can see her having a Broadway career.
|by Anonymous||reply 370||07/19/2014|
BMs the size of squirrels. Just reminding you.
|by Anonymous||reply 371||07/20/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 372||08/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 373||08/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 374||08/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 375||08/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 376||08/02/2014|
She has a gut in everything.
|by Anonymous||reply 377||08/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 378||08/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 379||08/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 380||08/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 381||08/02/2014|
i liked her in Company.
|by Anonymous||reply 382||08/02/2014|
What did R220 mean by WW?
|by Anonymous||reply 383||08/02/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 384||08/02/2014|
The bitch is fat. Her ass is incredibly flat as well. She actually has a horrible shape if you look at her sideways, but her boobs camouflage all of the problem areas.
|by Anonymous||reply 385||08/02/2014|
She looks slimmer in R379
|by Anonymous||reply 386||08/02/2014|
Thank you 384!
|by Anonymous||reply 387||08/02/2014|
She has rather pronounced collar bones.
|by Anonymous||reply 388||08/02/2014|
She looks more like a walking mountain range to me.
|by Anonymous||reply 389||08/02/2014|
R358 Her husband looks very skinny though. If she is overweight then she's the best looking overweight person in the world.
|by Anonymous||reply 390||08/02/2014|
I think she looks wonderful.
A normal sized woman, and one who is put together and cares about her appearance. Looks classy and doesn't look bland, suburban or as if she stopped giving a fuck.
|by Anonymous||reply 391||08/02/2014|
Perhaps it's rude to call someone full-figured. But then it's also rude to call someone fat, even though it may well be true.
|by Anonymous||reply 392||08/02/2014|
Interview in The Guardian to promote her film with PSH, God's Pocket. Disappointed to learn she's one of those people who register their pets as service animals so they can carry them on planes, despite all lack of therapeutic need.
|by Anonymous||reply 393||08/03/2014|
"I've been asked by Hendricks's PR not to ask any questions about her body in the interview. But, obviously, I try to bring it up anyway. Hendricks spots the approach from a mile off. "Don't do it," she says firmly, before I even get to the end of the sentence. She smiles but it's quite clear she means it. She finishes her raw steak and then places her knife and fork together on the plate. Just like Joan, there's a steely underwiring beneath that pale-skinned, blush-cheeked exterior."
|by Anonymous||reply 394||08/04/2014|
I love the subtle dig at her eating raw steak. Bitch, you can stall me all you want but I am gonna write that you are a COW!
|by Anonymous||reply 395||08/04/2014|
And the wine.
|by Anonymous||reply 396||08/04/2014|
Joan being a total bitch to Paul Kinsey:
|by Anonymous||reply 397||08/04/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 398||08/04/2014|
R397 - Paul deserved it.
|by Anonymous||reply 399||08/04/2014|
R386, that photo is older, all the others are recent.
|by Anonymous||reply 400||08/04/2014|
If R379 is Christina looking 'good' I don't want to see what she looks like now! Those melons she calls tits look like they're suffocating.
|by Anonymous||reply 401||08/04/2014|
I think she jacks up the size of her implants each time she puts on weight (see link). She's either delusional or in denial if she thinks people aren't going to comment on those freakish chin rests. In contrast, Dolly Parton responds with humor and doesn't take herself so f*ing seriously.
|by Anonymous||reply 402||08/04/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 404||08/04/2014|
What do you queens care about her weight? You don't see straight guys going on about Jonah Hill.
|by Anonymous||reply 405||08/04/2014|
[quote]You don't see straight guys going on about Jonah Hill.
No, but you see gays guys discussing his disgusting obesity.
|by Anonymous||reply 406||08/04/2014|
Well, actually maybe straight guys do make cracks on his weight but the difference is he is is/was/is once again genuinely obese. Christina Hendricks isn't. I doubt many straight guys are put off by her weight.
|by Anonymous||reply 407||08/04/2014|
And my point is gays aren't supposed to fancy her, just as straights aren't supposed to fancy Jonah Hill or other guys.
|by Anonymous||reply 408||08/04/2014|
She has what might be called a Lainie Kazan figure.
|by Anonymous||reply 409||08/04/2014|
She'll be lucky if she's called anything once Mad Men ends.
|by Anonymous||reply 410||08/04/2014|
[quote]And my point is gays aren't supposed to fancy her, just as straights aren't supposed to fancy Jonah Hill or other guys.
The gays don't fancy him either. At any weight.
|by Anonymous||reply 411||08/04/2014|
She seems to be doing well in theater.
|by Anonymous||reply 412||08/05/2014|
There was a blind about her getting turned down at auditions specifically because it's thought she is too fat, and that she is losing weight and is considering a breast reduction.
|by Anonymous||reply 413||08/14/2014|
where was that BL?
|by Anonymous||reply 414||08/16/2014|
Looking fat in recent video.
|by Anonymous||reply 415||08/17/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 416||08/17/2014|
That lardy thigh.
|by Anonymous||reply 417||08/17/2014|
R415 - That was a well done video.
|by Anonymous||reply 418||08/17/2014|
She’s Melissa McCarthy without the jokes.
She’s Precious without the welfare check.
|by Anonymous||reply 419||08/24/2014|
There’s a deluded three hundred pound frau on this thread. Everytime it gets bumped up, she’s there heralding Big Tina’s weight loss and how she’s soooooo not fat.
|by Anonymous||reply 420||08/24/2014|
Profile shots are not her friend.
|by Anonymous||reply 421||08/24/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 422||08/24/2014|
It’s rare to see obese people care like her. Most have given up.
|by Anonymous||reply 423||08/24/2014|
She looks normal. Considering the normal ‘Murkin, that’s not a healthy thing.
|by Anonymous||reply 424||08/24/2014|
The stop for Curvytown was forty pounds ago. She’s in Fatgirltown.
|by Anonymous||reply 425||08/24/2014|
If she only wants to lose weight for roles then she’ll gain it back. She needs to want to lose it for the sake of her health.
|by Anonymous||reply 426||08/24/2014|
She's lovely, and not at all obese.
|by Anonymous||reply 427||08/24/2014|
R427 = Ginny in Billing.
What happened to those brownies Shelley brought in, Ginny?
|by Anonymous||reply 428||08/24/2014|
She was miscast in Company. Too fat to be believable as a sexy air hostess. I see the baby voice and now she’s supposed to be sexy, but she isn’t, she’s big.
|by Anonymous||reply 430||08/24/2014|
Her phony baby voice sounds so odd on a great, big, fat woman.
|by Anonymous||reply 431||08/24/2014|
Big boobs, big thighs —— where’s the nipped-in waist?
|by Anonymous||reply 432||08/24/2014|
She’s not an hourglass. Her waist doesn’t go in —— without Spanx.
|by Anonymous||reply 433||08/24/2014|
She’s a cello.
|by Anonymous||reply 434||08/24/2014|
Darlin’, she’s a whole orchestra.
|by Anonymous||reply 435||08/24/2014|
Once the roles stop coming in after Mad Men ends, she’ll probably blow-up.
|by Anonymous||reply 436||08/24/2014|
She needs to get back to here Firefly weight. What happened?
|by Anonymous||reply 437||08/24/2014|
Maybe she has a glandular problem.
|by Anonymous||reply 438||08/24/2014|
Too much lunch R437
|by Anonymous||reply 439||08/24/2014|
She's a lot thinner than Melissa.
|by Anonymous||reply 440||08/24/2014|
She's a life support system for those silicon melons.
|by Anonymous||reply 441||08/24/2014|
She looks thinner here at an Emmy pre-party.
|by Anonymous||reply 442||08/24/2014|
She doesn't, R442. Although, black suits her. Dark colors are slimming.
|by Anonymous||reply 443||08/25/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 444||10/08/2014|
With Bellamy Young and Betsy Brandt. CH looks better.
|by Anonymous||reply 445||10/08/2014|
Wonder what this bitch looks like naked
|by Anonymous||reply 446||10/08/2014|
|by Anonymous||reply 447||11/06/2014|
What about "Ed-Asner-esque" ?
And what's more, this discussion is useless without pie. And ice cream.
|by Anonymous||reply 448||11/06/2014|
Born 1975 supposedly.
|by Anonymous||reply 450||11/07/2014|
She at least looks proportional in that outfit in R447
|by Anonymous||reply 451||11/08/2014|
She has a thin skin and hates the constant carping over fashion faux pas or what she perceives as the non-issue of her weight. "I am too emotional," she admits. "I do take things personally because someone is always wanting to criticise or say something negative. I don't know why it is. I'm sure there's tons of blogs out there about how horrible Meryl Streep is." She guffaws at the thought. "And we all know that's not true."
She's right that her physical attributes come up again and again whenever she is interviewed or written about. On one level you can understand why – in a world where wraith-like thinness in actresses is revered, Hendricks is full-blooded proof that gorgeousness can exist, and be embraced, in a different construct. Her costumes in Mad Men – fitted dresses with nipped-in waists and knee-length pencil skirts worn over uncomfortable girdles and underwired long-line bras – only served to accentuate her hourglass figure and have influenced a host of fashion designers.
On another level you can also see why Hendricks is fed up with talking about it, because it is demeaning to suggest that the success of any woman's work depends on her vital statistics rather than her talent.
I've been asked by Hendricks's PR not to ask any questions about her body in the interview. But, obviously, I try to bring it up anyway. Hendricks spots the approach from a mile off. "Don't do it," she says firmly, before I even get to the end of the sentence. She smiles but it's quite clear she means it. She finishes her raw steak and then places her knife and fork together on the plate. Just like Joan, there's a steely underwiring beneath that pale-skinned, blush-cheeked exterior.
|by Anonymous||reply 452||11/22/2014|
Call her a fat cunt who can't dress for shit who is weeks away from emulating the last phase of Joan Crawford's career and see what she says. Full figured never bothered Marilyn Monroe or Jane Russell. Pretentious basic cable twat. Better yet, TWUNT! El Twunte Grande!
|by Anonymous||reply 453||11/27/2014|
Do you ever get tired of your own nastiness, R453?
|by Anonymous||reply 454||11/27/2014|
She's chubbier than Marilyn was.
|by Anonymous||reply 455||11/27/2014|
I'm totally gay, but I would love to explore Christina's curves.
She is sex on a stick.
|by Anonymous||reply 456||11/27/2014|
no 454. It keeps me alive. I kill your pets! I KEEL them!
|by Anonymous||reply 457||11/27/2014|
Calling me sarcastic is just true.
|by Anonymous||reply 458||11/28/2014|
[quote] "Call her a fat cunt who can't dress for shit who is weeks away from emulating the last phase of Joan Crawford's career and see what she says. Full figured never bothered Marilyn Monroe or Jane Russell. Pretentious basic cable twat. Better yet, TWUNT! El Twunte Grande!"
R453, your post made me laugh till tears rolled down my legs.
|by Anonymous||reply 459||11/28/2014|
[quote]I'm sure there's tons of blogs out there about how horrible Meryl Streep is." She guffaws at the thought. "And we all know that's not true."
Could she be pretending that she hasn't been on DL before?
|by Anonymous||reply 460||11/28/2014|
[quote] Calling me full-figured is just rude.
Would she prefer fat?
|by Anonymous||reply 461||11/28/2014|
She is overweight, but Christina does have great skin.
|by Anonymous||reply 462||11/29/2014|
A little slimmer?
|by Anonymous||reply 463||02/13/2015|
You know, Hendricks had no problem earning money as a model while playing up, to put it lightly, her enormous assets. If she did not have the body type she has she never would have been cast on Mad Men.
She uses her voluptuousness to make money and get acting jobs but she is clearly unhappy about the way she looks. Weird!
|by Anonymous||reply 464||02/13/2015|
What are we supposed to call her? Slender and petite? Should the Australian journalist phrased her question as, "Well, chubbo you've probably inspired a lot of other chubbos. Are there any chubbos that inspired you?"
The chick has got issues.
|by Anonymous||reply 465||02/14/2015|
R465 If the journalist was Australian then I'd be surprised if they didn't say something like that.
|by Anonymous||reply 466||02/14/2015|
She's more fat than curvy.
|by Anonymous||reply 467||02/14/2015|
R464 -"If she did not have the body type she has she never would have been cast on Mad Men."
She has gained about 20 lbs since Mad Men started
|by Anonymous||reply 468||02/14/2015|
She's fat. More attractive than most fat girls, sure, but she's still fat.
|by Anonymous||reply 469||02/14/2015|
I think Hendricks is unbelievably beautiful. I'm a 9 on the kinsey and I'd do her- gorgeous. Nice to see a woman with an actual figure, I'd gladly have that voluptuous ginger on my arm.
|by Anonymous||reply 470||02/14/2015|
How much do you think she weighs?
|by Anonymous||reply 471||04/25/2015|
R465 they are supposed to not ask her about her body. It is considered rude to be commenting on a woman's tits or ass or size. If she were a size zero, no one would bring it up in interviews. At most you'd get a how do you keep in shape question.
|by Anonymous||reply 472||04/25/2015|
Straight men love her. They don't seem to think she's fat, but they think women much thinner than her are.
|by Anonymous||reply 473||04/25/2015|
Christina Hendricks is a homely fatso who got lucky by landing the part of Joan.
She has used her enormous breasts and the rest of her "curves" to draw attention to herself and to land parts and now whines, "Why does everyone make such a big deal about my body????" (And then she proceeds to show up on the red carpet with her "twins" sticking out the top of her gown.)
Because you have used it as a selling point hon'! Ever hear of breast reduction surgery (and while we're at it, ever hear of but firming exercises?)?
Christina Hendricks LOOKS like she has emotional problems and that red hair looks hideous on her.
Once Mad Men is done and over with Hendricks, Jones and Hamm will be done and over with too.
|by Anonymous||reply 474||04/25/2015|
Come on, she's not homely at all. Elizabeth Moss is homely.
|by Anonymous||reply 475||04/25/2015|
Zac Efron is full figured, rigtht? Thas's wahat all the posts were about wasn't it.
|by Anonymous||reply 476||04/25/2015|
I agree with R475. There is nothing homely about her. She has lovely features.
|by Anonymous||reply 477||04/25/2015|
170 lbs? 180 lbs?
|by Anonymous||reply 478||04/25/2015|
|by Anonymous||reply 479||04/25/2015|
R474 you sound like a jealous frau. She is a bit overweight but her coloring is beautiful.
|by Anonymous||reply 480||04/25/2015|
I agree R480
|by Anonymous||reply 481||04/25/2015|
I think you're an ugly woman, Christina. I saw the picture online, and I felt compelled to tell you how disgusting you look, and you have a cigarette. You're not woman enough to be called full-figured. You're just nasty.
|by Anonymous||reply 482||05/11/2015|
Based on these pics, it looks like she has lost weight.
|by Anonymous||reply 483||05/11/2015|