So the National Enquirer can just declare Civil War 2.0?

WHAT?!?!

J-Lo is battling paralysis?!?

I'm more interested in the top story on that page... "J-Lo's paralysis!"

Kill the entire staff at The National Enquirer. Problem solved.

But who is the hottest cougar?!

Naomi Judd was only worth $25 million? That is the most shocking thing on the cover.

Are they ever wrong?

R6 still , a call to war like that is treasonous

Weekly World News did it long before the National Enquirer.

What kind of paralysis are they talking about? Did her Botox esthetician overdo it?

It is not the same thing and you know it R8

NE has a political angle, Weekly World News's is religious

R2 I read the J-Lo story at the supermarket, it was BS. It was some kind of "mental paralysis " caused by stress and overwork.

We can't properly make fun of the article if you don't post it, OP.

It is not about making fun of the article, it is about how can that headline be OK legally?

It's the National. Fucking. Enquirer, Rose.

When was the last time they published anything that's true?

True or Not, it is certainly not legally sound. It is illegal to step on the flag jokingly, Then why are things like this be OK? Also I thought some judge make them playing nice after J6. WHET?

[quote] It is not about making fun of the article, it is about how can that headline be OK legally?

You're right. It's as if they think there's freedom of the press in this country!

[quote] "J-Lo is battling paralysis?!?"

Oh, no! I hope it isn't of the vocal variety!

Why would it be illegal, r15?

If somebody at the Natioanl Enquirer wants to write that, then they have the right to write that.

And you have the right not to reward them by buying it, and you also have the right to disprove their argument (not that I'm pretending the N.E. will make anything like an actual "argument'), or to just call them assholes. whatever. So long as you're not threatening anybody, you're good.

It's called the First Amendment: Freedom of Speech; Freedom of the Press.

I understand from the National Enquirer that aliens are among us.

Also, they report that Elvis is alive.

Not sure if the two are related.

The real problem here is OP taking anything seen on the cover of NE seriously.

[quote]It is not about making fun of the article, it is about how can that headline be OK legally?

It’s called THE FIRST AMENDMENT, commie fuck.

It’s called TREASON for declaring war on UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, commie fuck.

I've never told anyone this, but I sold a photo of an A List Celebrity to the National Enquirer once that ended up on the Cover. They paid me $10,000 Dollars! I know many bitter bitches here won't believe it, but it's true!

Sure, Jan

I miss the days of the three headed martians landing...or the human baby born from a dog.

[quote]It’s called TREASON for declaring war on UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, commie fuck.

Wrong.

OP = Boris.

Ignore.

[quote]It’s called TREASON for declaring war on UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, commie fuck.

Learn how to read, retard. Jesus. Another victim of Betsy Devos.

But more importantly, WHET Bat Boy??

In 2016 they did weekly stories about Hillary being near death. They were also involved in buying stories from the two porn stars who had sex with Trump and then burying their stories. They are just stirring up right-wing shit again. I'm surprised they haven't been sued into bankruptcy.

And before someone yells about the first amendment again, that is not an absolute blank check to print whatever you want.

What does civil war even mean? A few MAGATs upset about Maralago? No one gives a shit about that,

The article revolves around the poll that says Americans expect to see a Civil War in their lifetime and that they’re prepared to take up arms. Interestingly, the article goes pretty hard on Right wingers and Right wing extremism.

[quote] "J-Lo is battling paralysis?!?"

**snickers**

More like battling electrolysis!

R23 who was the picture of ?Was the person a gay in the picture?

Hasn’t everyone and their mother been constantly saying it has erupted over the past several years. Unsurprisingly this phenomenon has coincided with less historical literacy. Because anyone who has spent anytime studying the Civil War would damn sure not be calling for a reboot.

Are we really debating stories in the National Enquirer?

Really?

Seriously?

I mean, seriously.

Cvil War is so boring.

We are, bc after J6, NE was supposed to be restructured to be less political per pressure from election machine company. WHET?

Also, MAGA would absolutely believe this and gun down the public, so this is a public safety issue

The Enquirer is the paper of record for this shithole!

I believe, r23!

the lunatic left declared war in 2016 when their corruptocrat clinton's lost. it's been brewing ever since. give them what they want!

r13 it's called "free speech/freedom of the press". remember that? liberal lefty loons like you are frightened of anything that might pierce your little liberal drag queen reading hour/slavery reparations confirmation bias bubble.

I believe you R23.

10 Gs is a very tidy sum. Good for you, r23!

The first amendment will be the death of democracy in America.

Every evil lying propagandist out to establish a rightwing dictatorship piously invokes the first amendment when called on their dangerous mob incitement. Remember “Q: into the storm?”

Remember that Alex Jones’ LLC is/was called “ Free Speech Systems.”

R42, did you get lost on the way to a Q discussion group?

The National Enquirer was always laughable and tabloid, but tabloidism (a word?) has filtered into mainstream media now...to some extent.

many things Q brought forward came to light remember epstein and his murder? keep your heads up your ass you're addicted to the smell of all you ingested.

Yeah, the National Enquirer is always wrong!

They're confusing civil war with oligarch-sponsored terrorism.

R23, I believe you because I've done the same thing and you have the correct pay scale. Yours was a half cover story, correct? Mine was a quarter cover and I was paid half that.

1. Go to the supermarket and fill your shopping cart with lobster tails and filet mignon.

2. Get on line at the checkout and have the cashier ring you up.

3. When she says ‘that will be $9,548 and 38 cents’, hold up two copies of the Enquirer, turn to display them to the whole store and scream at the top of your lungs ‘Fuck You bitch! There’s a Civil War going on! You and your market are saying so! Eat shit!’

4. Run to your waiting car with Bonnie at the wheel, toss the lobster and meat into the trunk and drive away at a very high speed.

Clyde Barrow

QAnonners are lower than dogshit on your shoe, on a 100° day.

FOAD, Q scum. FOAD.

The right to shout 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre , indeed.

Meanwhile, Trump will have called the 'Editor' in praise of such astute responsible journalism. And then assert he'd do all he could to secure said hack a Pulitzer. And then forget about it two minutes later.

[quote] many things Q brought forward came to light remember epstein and his murder

Yeah right, Q brought Epstein forth & jailed him in FL. Q arrested Epstein and prosecuted him. Q put him in probation & rearrested him.

Note - nobody was paying attention to Epstein until Barr became head of DoJ. It had been years since Epstein had been released on parole.

FF the Qtard who stumbled in here.

Q is WRONG 99.999% of the time, you dumb motherfuck!

Editrix!

Here’s an example of why a civil war isn’t possible, no matter how hard people try to insinuate one is eminent:

In the 2020 election, Trump received his highest percentage of votes in Wyoming (nearly 70% of all votes cast). However, that only represents 193,559 people, which is a little over half of the population of eligible voters in the entire state.

The point is, in even the most deep red, conservative states, at least half of the people are Democrats, independent, or apolitical. Republicans in Texas always talk about seceding, yet 5.8 million Texans voted for Trump and 5.2 million voted for Biden. No state would be able to fight a civil war at the national level before they finished their county, then state civil wars.

If the US ever had anything close to a “civil war,” it would be similar to The Troubles.

There must be, or should be, some journalism oversight body?

Let's end freedom of speech and freedom of belief because people don't think and say what I want them to.

Shouldn't you be on the hunt for Qdrops, R63? Do your own research!

The resident Qloon here is actually the Vegas barmaid with shitty shoes.

Random violence is already happening, but not a civil war. Not sure but wonder if they mean deplorables may start shootings government officials and Democrats?