It's inevitable, given the composition of the Court
Next up - the overturn of Obergefell v. Hodges
by Anonymous | reply 11 | June 24, 2022 8:06 PM |
you're right
by Anonymous | reply 1 | June 24, 2022 2:35 PM |
Yep, agree
by Anonymous | reply 2 | June 24, 2022 2:35 PM |
Thomas writes in his concurring opinion:
"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents."
by Anonymous | reply 3 | June 24, 2022 2:37 PM |
And heeeere it is!
by Anonymous | reply 4 | June 24, 2022 2:37 PM |
Hey, Clarence...why don't you go after Loving v. Virginia?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | June 24, 2022 4:14 PM |
Well, obviously the government should have no say in MY marriage, R5
by Anonymous | reply 6 | June 24, 2022 5:12 PM |
R3, that makes my heart hurt.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | June 24, 2022 5:23 PM |
[quote] Hey, Clarence...why don't you go after Loving v. Virginia?
Have you seen and heard my wife? Hell, I would fight to write the majority opinion to overturn Loving. No messy divorce required.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | June 24, 2022 5:29 PM |
Not to worry, the Human Rights Campaign will save you!
by Anonymous | reply 9 | June 24, 2022 5:45 PM |
[quote]Next up - the overturn of Obergefell v. Hodges
Followed by the overturn of Lawrence v. Texas and a national ban on homosexuality
by Anonymous | reply 10 | June 24, 2022 7:54 PM |
Separate but equal, Clarence...
Enjoy the walk to the closest bathroom.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | June 24, 2022 8:06 PM |