Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Abraham Lincoln's coat, and its hidden, bloody stories

While some arrivals at this year's Met Gala at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City were greeted with a lot of fanfare, one treasured object arrived undercover, amid great secrecy, from a museum warehouse outside Washington, D.C.: the coat that Abraham Lincoln was wearing on April 14, 1865, the night he was assassinated at Ford's Theatre. It arrived with a police escort.

"It's slightly an out-of-body experience to realize that this was worn by President Lincoln, and the circumstances in which it was worn," said Andrew Bolton, head curator of the Met's Costume Institute. "It's just incredibly meaningful and very emotional, I think."

The coat is part of the Met's new exhibit, "In America: An Anthology of Fashion," which illuminates the complex history of our country through clothing

"Sometimes the most moving stories are stories that are untold," Bolton told correspondent Faith Salie. "And this story, for many people, will be an untold story."

Untold and unseen, as well. Shortly after her husband's death, Mary Todd Lincoln gave the coat to their beloved doorman, Alphonse Donn, whose family kept it for over a century, before bequeathing it to Ford's Theatre in 1968.

The coat, created by Brooks Brothers for Lincoln's second inauguration, has never before left the D.C. area, and is rarely shown to the public in order to protect its fragile nature.

What's not on display is an embroidered message in the coat's lining: "The inside of the coat is very meaningful because it has the inscription, 'One country, one destiny,' which came from a speech from one of Lincoln's heroes. So, it has this very personal message for Lincoln."

"And how symbolic for a man who had to probably carry such a complicated inner life," said Salie.

"Absolutely And it was obviously something that he spoke to Brooks Brothers about, and Brooks Brothers came up with the lining."

Perhaps the most moving aspect of the coat is the part that's not there: the lining that was soaked in Lincoln's blood. "The sleeve has been severed because of the lining that has been cut away for relics, and sold as relics," said Bolton. "So, the sort of gruesomeness and the sadness and the pathos of this particular piece all comes out when you see it."

Salie said, "It makes you remember there was a human being in this."

"I think often when you see clothing, the absence of the body sometimes is more poetic than the presence of the body," said Bolton. "You walk around the exhibition and you look at the George Washington coat, or the coat worn by an enslaved man, the absence of that body somehow gives it almost more potency, I think."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23May 18, 2022 4:43 PM

Gross!

How macabre.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1May 16, 2022 3:11 PM

He was so tiny, look at how narrow that is at the waist.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2May 16, 2022 3:12 PM

Why are they spritzing it?

by Anonymousreply 3May 16, 2022 3:23 PM

Why is it only half a coat?

by Anonymousreply 4May 16, 2022 3:24 PM

[quote] Why is it only half a coat?

I'm assuming they removed the part that was soaked in blood.

by Anonymousreply 5May 16, 2022 3:27 PM

Weird that the arm is detached. How would you wear that?

by Anonymousreply 6May 16, 2022 3:28 PM

Was anyone else surprised that Brooks Brothers was around during Lincoln’s time?

by Anonymousreply 7May 16, 2022 3:31 PM

R4 and R6 need to read the article.

by Anonymousreply 8May 16, 2022 3:36 PM

They cut up the bloody parts for relics.

Where can I get me some of that?

by Anonymousreply 9May 16, 2022 3:42 PM

Reason I didn't want my pink Chanel gawked at by the Hoi Polloi.

by Anonymousreply 10May 16, 2022 3:59 PM

Do you think it will fit me?

by Anonymousreply 11May 16, 2022 3:59 PM

I wonder who has JFK's suit he was wearing when he was shot.

by Anonymousreply 12May 16, 2022 4:08 PM

I will answer my own question

[quote] The apparel worn by President Kennedy on November 22, 1963, is in the legal and physical custody of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The President's apparel was used as evidence during the Warren Commission investigation into the assassination during the years 1963 through 1964. When the work of the Warren Commission ended, the apparel was transferred to NARA under a deed of gift. The apparel is located in a secure area, under climate-controlled conditions, and stored flat in special containers for preservation purposes. In addition, NARA created detailed color photos of these materials as part of a larger preservation effort to photograph the significant artifacts in the JFK Assassination Records Collection. Due to the restraints of the deed of gift under which the materials were transferred to NARA, NARA has not posted these photographs online, as we have with photographs of other JFK assassination related artifacts. However, the photographs of the clothing are available for examination in our research room in College Park, Maryland, or may be purchased for a fee.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13May 16, 2022 4:15 PM

The National Archives also has Jackie's blood stained pink suit she was wearing when her husband was assassinated, it was deeded to the National Archives by Caroline Kennedy but she required that it will remain hidden until the year 2103.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14May 16, 2022 4:21 PM

[quote] Why are they spritzing it?

Just a guess here but I think they are blowing dust off with those tools.

by Anonymousreply 15May 16, 2022 4:24 PM

Fascinating! So much pivotal history in a piece of clothing.

by Anonymousreply 16May 16, 2022 4:37 PM

You can also see how well made clothing was made back then

by Anonymousreply 17May 16, 2022 4:39 PM

Thin because he was a gay who liked to keep his figure.

Unless that gross fat James Buchanan.

by Anonymousreply 18May 16, 2022 4:44 PM

Correction:..You can also see how well made clothing was back then..*

by Anonymousreply 19May 16, 2022 4:44 PM

Was Abe gay?

by Anonymousreply 20May 17, 2022 6:03 AM

Beats me.

by Anonymousreply 21May 17, 2022 6:05 AM

Josh and Abe were lovers?

by Anonymousreply 22May 18, 2022 1:12 AM

Beats me.

by Anonymousreply 23May 18, 2022 4:43 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!