Who Dis?

[quote] "I usually don’t like blond guys"

We're sure they're devastated.

But thanks for telegraphing us. We'll send out sympathy cards:

"Take heart darlings. Somewhere else there's a delusional blubbery old fart for you. Just not this one."

I don't know him (but I'd like to).

My future husband, OP.

Sponsored by Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Endo is a specialty pharmaceutical company committed to helping everyone we serve live their best life through the delivery of quality, life-enhancing therapies.

Quite big tits.

He doesn't exist.

Original pic...

lol.

Apparently, there are people who have nothing better to do with their time than to 'improve' pictures by making the guys hotter. I'm assuming they jerk off to these pics.

Why they would do this with pictures of clothed men, I don't understand at all. I mean, if you take your time to carefully photoshop these pics, then do it with pornographic pics...

See here for more.

It's interesting to A/B the photos. Obviously the face, but check out which spots on the body that might not have predicted make such a difference. It also helps understand how teenagers are tortured by trying to reach impossible standards.

The photoshopper is learning a highly marketable skill.

Elonganting and thinning the abdomen, building up the shoulders, adding a little curve to the waistband of the sweats, narrowing the waist. They took a guy with an [italic] amazing [/italic] body and still morphed it to an impossible-to-achieve state.

I recommend to check out the site that I posted above. There are many pics like this, especially if you google the user names to see the originals. I mean, I can appreciate the beauty of the 'enhanced' pictures (although often the original is handsome as well in a natural way) but, in the end, it seems a bit mean-spirited and pointless.

I find the originals hotter actually.

I don’t understand the strings of letters and number’s attached to these images? What do they mean and where to they come from? Who assigns them?

Can I send them a picture of me to fix?

…AND, the assault on the truth continues…

Some dude with huge tits

Trannies are the ultimate assault on truth r17

[quote]I don’t understand the strings of letters and number’s attached to these images? What do they mean and where to they come from? Who assigns them?

The websites (Twitter, Tumblr, etc). They don't mean anything.

[quote] Can I send them a picture of me to fix?

Oh honey, no. Nobody's got that much free time.

Looks like this is just a guy who likes twinky faces and hunky bodies, and since he doesn't find enough naturally occuring instances of this combination, he turns to Photoshop.

[quote] in the end, it seems a bit mean-spirited and pointless.

R13 - It's worse than that. They whitewashed the Hispanic guy in photo A by making him Anglo-white. Read into that what you will.

I hate the race card but God damn, sometimes it's real.

A British gymnast has had the upgrade.

Just another roided out young man.

Which type is the artist?

The "decile" chart on "incels.wiki" - yes, this is real.

The photoshoppers are making 19-25 yo "gigachads" (10s) out of often slightly older 8-9s.

I'm telling you now so I don't have to tell you later.

Is this real?

Looks real until it opens its mouth to speak.

It's as real as you want it to be... just like the news!

r27/r28

No, I think you've got this wrong. That "incel" community has a very straight perspective - "gigachads" are a straight male's idea of what appeals to straight females. This stuff on the other hand is clearly tailored to a gay male gaze.

There are gay incels.

R34

No, there aren't - the incel ideology is very gendered. And even if there were, they wouldn't be obsessed with "gigachads", cause gay men have different beauty ideals.

It's funny how some of you take a Reddit community with a small number of users and turn it into this giant worldwide conspiracy.

R35 has a very narrow, rigid archaic/quaint view of gay men

R37

No - my point is that incels have a very narrow view of what constitutes an attractive male (square jaw, tall, etc). That ideal appeals to some gay men, but overall gay men's taste is more varied. And the beauty ideal in these pictures, which puts a premium on boyish facial features, doesn't fit in with the "gigachad" concept at all.

The difference between OP and r6 is very subtle to me, but r6 is hotter to me

Whew gurl, can you incel trolls take a hike and start your own thread? Either post hot dudes caught morphing their pics or step off!

Hot bodies, too many overly boyish faces though.

R37, agree. R35/R38 seems to think most DLers are representative of gays at large lol. If anything, I’d say the average gay dude IS very much into the stereotypical gigachad look (even if he doesn’t look anything like that himself).

The real pic dude is hot. Who is he?

Wait , r40 thinks the blisteringly hot dudes are photoshopping THEMSELVES as late teen boys with big eyes????? 🤪

More!

He is ideal

Sizzlin