Straight porn and it's violent tropes

Porn is general is brain frying - gay men and straight men alike have had their expectations warped by it. I'd say straight porn is more violent, but does it even matter if the effect on the brain is the same?

Straight men perform for other men. It's the same dynamic that leads to street harassment, gang rape, etc. Chimps, the lot of them.

Most men merely tolerate women, Porn is a way for them to degrade the gals and get their hatred out.

[quote] On the rare occasion that I stumble upon straight porn

Sure. You just "stumble" onto that violent, degrading porn.

Never believe anything typed by a moron who doesn't know the difference between its and it's.

[quote]Most men merely tolerate women, Porn is a way for them to degrade the gals and get their hatred out.

Absolutely.

R4 I meant that I don't actively search for straight porn. But whatever gets recommended to me is always violent, even if it is supposed to be between lovers or happy couples.

R5 kindly eat shit, throw it back up then eat it again.

Dear R7 / OP, kindly learn basic grammar and punctuation in between viewing your favorite scat videos.

I like straight pron but only the amateur stuff. When I see bleach blonde hair, waxed bodies, fake boobs and garish lighting- it's a turnoff.

I LOVe how rough and animate straight porn stars have become. Even rimming has become more common (girl on guy). I wish more gay tops could be that dominate and nasty in bed. It's all a bit of fun and gives the fantasy of the nice hard fuck most men love to have from time to time.

What R2 said. Straight porn has nothing to do with what pleases women. Even the amateur stuff is bullshit.

Someone asked why women are "obsessed" with gay porn. I wouldn't say obsessed per se, but this right here is why women watch this porn instead of its' straight counterpart.

R12 Yep, we're not obsessed with gay porn but we enjoy watching the intimacy that doesn't exist in straight porn.

[quote] its'

More apostrophe idiocy from the pornisseurs!

Oh for fucks sake. Do we really need nibby nosing straight women trolling this site?!

"Nibby nosing"??

British or Appalachian-derived (either way, it should be hyphenated):

I saw something once, I think it was on Twitter, where a woman/young girl, was having her tits nailed or stapled down to a plank of wood. It was seriously disturbing the image of that lingered in my head for days after. And I saw something else where a guy was punching, spitting and stepping on the woman's face.

I don't understand how anyone can seriously find that enjoyable. There's some really sick and twisted fucks out there.

[quote] There's some really sick and twisted fucks out there.

Not unlike the many DLers who pontificate about serial killers to the point of obvious sexual obsession?

I don't understand how anyone who has seen the two can say there are any similarities. 90% of the time it's about abuse and degradation of the woman.

It's shocking.

But there are so many things in straight culture that are just so weird and fucked up from a gay's perspective. Straight people can be some of the meanest, unsympathetic, anti-social people on the planet. SEE Republican Party.

There are different levels of hardcore in porn. If you watch stuffs from Brazzers, Tushy, Passion, Reality guys etc. then, you usually get the mellow version of hardcore. Some are outright silly and hilarious like the woman gets her torso "stuck" in the dryer machine and the guy fucks her to get her out. A lot of bangbros and bangbus videos are very focused on the body parts, so most of their videos are extreme close-ups of cock, ass and pussy. Watch Mike Adriano's stuffs for that. Most of the aforementioned porn are not violent or abusive per se. Now, if you stumbled upon a site like Facial Abuse, then you'd be perplexed. Pass around gangbang scenes? Yes, it is humiliating. If you see some stuffs from animated porn from a genre called Guro, you'd be downright traumatized.

Also, men and women are subject to different standards regarding sexuality. Certain things that would horrify you to see in straight porn will somehow be not so concerning in gay porn. For example, Sketchy sex is a gay porn site that films sex scene in a frat house setting where one or two bottoms get fucked silly by the house mates. There's a lot of name calling, degrading and humiliating elements to it. But we accept it as it is. However, a similar setting with a chick that's getting pushed around by bunch of frat boys, writing counts of loads on her ass that she's taken and being passed around to everybody would have different reaction.

R21, eh....no.

Women like gay porn better than straight porn because it's more realistic.

R22 I don't care what kind of porn women like. I was only pointing out that there are different levels of hardcore and different genre in porn. Straight porn is not targeted to women audience anyways.

[quote] to women audience anyways

OH DEAR

R18 That is grotesque and I wish I hadn't read it. It just sounds like torture/rape. I avoid straight porn because it is more about degradation and violence than sex. I guess some men hate women a lot. I also read in a DL thread the other day that someone felt gay porn was becoming too violent as well so there might be a larger problem with humanity in general. Homo sapiens are the worst.

R24 Yes, please. Pick on a measly mistake while avoiding the main argument and discussion.

What I hate about straight porn is the women are always moaning whores. It's more sexy to me if the woman is kind of reluctant. Give her some dignity!

I can watch straight amateurs fuck but professional straight porn is pointless.

There was a straight sex series I came across recently (no pun intended), and I can't remember the name but it was actually pretty sweet. In each video there would be two porn stars who you would normally see in all those fantasy/role-play pornos choose each other just to have sex with, like they normally would when not acting out a studio's fantasy. There's no weird positions for the camera or anything, they just fuck. After you've seen some of the straight porn out there, that many of these actors are involved in even, it is quite pleasantly surprising how romantic and gentle and fun the whole thing looks.

R29 wish you remembered the name of this series. By any chance do you remember anyone who was in this?

Oh yeah, I remember it had male porn stars like Chad White, Lucas Frost, Charles Dera. Like, I'd seen some of these guys be really rough in other videos, but when it was just casual and no frills and sex like they wanted it, it just looked sweet, fun and sexy.

I also watched a discussion between Robby Echo and Stirling Cooper before and they were talking about how the type of sex they like is like that too. The other stuff really is just acting, and it's based on what gets the most views - so it is down to what a lot of consumers want to see. They had a big joke about how everything was family related in porn now, but they have to call it "stepfather, stepdaughter, stepmother" etc, so it's not incestuous, but everyone knows what fantasy is being catered to.

I'll look around and see if I can remember what it was called, R30.

Thanks for the info!

Was it possible 'Pure Taboo'?

Hey R32. No, not Pure Taboo, but Pure Taboo is where a lot of the actors in this other series seem to do their work which is why it was nice seeing them doing something more light hearted.

Hey R32, I found it. I think the company do different series, but this one is the type of thing I mean. These two hadn't actually met before doing this video.

Straight porn is sexist because a lot of times you don't even see the guy's face. He is just an object for the pleasure of women.

And in this one, the two talk in the beginning about not being that fond of the storylines they get told to perform in their other work:

Do straight porn actors have vasectomies in case of an accident?

I used to watch quite a bit of straight porn when I was trying to force myself to be straight (the fact that I only liked straight porn if it was mfm should've made me realize that was a lost cause) and so much of it had coercion as a theme. This has steeped into gay porn in recent years too.

Straight sex, not just in porn, has always been about the man making the woman have his baby. Gay sex has a different dynamic.

[quote] where a woman/young girl, was having her tits nailed or stapled down to a plank of wood

When I say I screamed😱

And I’m someone who doesn’t mind a bit of moderate S&M, and has a love/hate relationship with my own breasts (they’re D side sitters that hang low, fucking nightmare to make look presentable or perky). That is too fucking far.

To make a guy flinch: going down pull the dick slightly to the right and lick the skin and hair on the left side base

R35 Straight porn is catered to straight guys. They are the core audience and straight guys don't even like to hear the men in the porn breathe too heavy. Also, the women are the object of pleasure in straight porn, not men. How do you even write such a bullshit? Have you ever watched straight porn where the men tried to make the women cum? No, the climax is always the men jizzing and getting off.

I don't watch straight porn, but there sure in the hell is a lot of ass slapping, rough play, mild choking, etc. in gay porn.

R34 Thanks for finding the show!

Suprised it's even debatable at this point. I believe there's been studies proving it's more violent. It's been theorized that straight women and girls have flocked to gay content for that reason (graphic novels, porn, etc.) They find it less aggressive, with pleasure being more mutual. Obviously that's not all porn, you can find anything these days, but on an average.

R42 A lot of guys in straight porn are ugly with big cocks.

I never understand people who look to porn for romance or positive depictions of sex. Porn is about beating that pussy up. Wrecking a hole. Messing up her makeup when you nut on her face. No one fucks like that in real life. It's a fantasy. Check out Legal Porno. 8 guys on one little Russian, just destroying her.

Bump

Captain Obvious typed what, this time?