Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Prince Charles funded Harry and Meghan even after they stepped down as royals

Yet all they do is bitch about him.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16June 25, 2021 6:14 PM

Who cares? Do you complain that Andrew’s parasite family continues to receive funding?

by Anonymousreply 1June 24, 2021 6:18 PM

LONDON — Prince Charles continued to financially support the Duke and Duchess of Sussex after they stepped down as senior members of the British royal family, according to financial accounts released Thursday.

Prince Charles’s office, Clarence House, published in its annual accounts that Charles paid his sons Prince William and Harry, and their families, a sum of $6.3 million. The annual report covers the period from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021. It’s not broken down by family.

[bold]Prince Harry had previously told Oprah Winfrey that his family "literally cut me off financially" in the first quarter of 2020. [/bold] He said he had to use money left to him by his mother, Princess Diana, to help pay for security for his family.

A spokesman for Clarence House told the BBC that “the Prince of Wales allocated a substantial sum” to Harry and Meghan last year “to support them” with their transition in stepping down as senior members of the British royal family and relocating to California.

“That funding ceased in the summer of last year. The couple are now financially independent,” he said.

A spokesman for the Sussexes told The Washington Post that it was inaccurate to suggest a contradiction, and that Harry’s comments were “in reference to the first quarter of the fiscal reporting period in U.K., which starts annually in April.”

Buckingham Palace, meanwhile, also published its annual royal accounts, which included figures on ethnic diversity of its staff for the first time.

The figures showed that 8.5 percent of its staff members are from an ethnic minority background, far less than the population in London, where it is just under 40 percent, or the country in general, which the latest census estimated to be 13.5 percent.

Most of its staff is based in London.

An official for the palace said “we recognize we are not where we would like to be and that despite all our efforts to target recruitment, train managers and build an inclusive workplace, the results have not been what we would like.”

The official, speaking on the condition of anonymity according to protocol, added that “we are committed to improving this, hence we have started to publish diversity statistics to ensure we are open and transparent about our efforts to improve. We fully expect to be held accountable regarding our progress.”

The palace says it wants to reach a target of 10 percent in 2022. A recruitment and pay freeze was imposed last year in response to the financial pressures resulting from the pandemic.

In their stunning interview with Winfrey, the Sussexes claimed that an unnamed member of the royal family had voiced concerns about their unborn child’s skin color.

Following the interview, William insisted that the royals were “very much not a racist family.”

The annual report of royal accounts also offered an insight into the inner workings of the royal household. Last year, the queen received the equivalent of $120 million — equal to $1.80 per person in Britain — from the Sovereign Grant, the publicly funded contribution to the royal family’s work. The money is spent on things such as paying for staff — the bill for 508 full-time employees came in at $33.7 million — and the upkeep of royal residences. Buckingham Palace is undergoing a major, multiyear refurbishment. (cont.)

by Anonymousreply 2June 24, 2021 6:19 PM

They hate paying for a Black person. Brits are so laughable deferring to this glorified welfare family. The Queen has done fuck all for anyone

by Anonymousreply 3June 24, 2021 6:19 PM

(cont.) The accounts show that Harry and Meghan made a $3.4 million payment as a reimbursement for the renovation costs to Frogmore Cottage, their previous residence in Windsor. This also included 18 months of rent.

The annual accounts also showed that the royal coffers have taken a hit during the pandemic. The income from the paying public fell by half, compared with the previous year, as palaces were closed to the tourists and visitors.

This summer, for the first time ever, Buckingham Palace will allow paying visitors to picnic in the queen’s 39-acre garden, starting in July. The area, the largest private garden in London, includes a 3.5-acre lake and over 1,000 trees, including mulberry planted by James I in 1608.

by Anonymousreply 4June 24, 2021 6:19 PM

Why do all the Royals look like they belong in a barn?

by Anonymousreply 5June 24, 2021 6:20 PM

... as most parents do- help their children - regardless

by Anonymousreply 6June 24, 2021 6:23 PM

[quote]Who cares?

The Washington Post, which is breaking this story on their website just now.

If you really don't care, then just scroll past . Stop constantly bitching (which is what we also say to your whining idols).

by Anonymousreply 7June 24, 2021 6:23 PM

[quote] ... as most parents do- help their children - regardless

But most children don't whinge that they're receiving no help and have been "cut off without a penny."

by Anonymousreply 8June 24, 2021 6:24 PM

[quote] Why do all the Royals look like they belong in a barn?

That's a cruel (albeit accurate) thing to say about Meghan and Harry!

by Anonymousreply 9June 24, 2021 6:25 PM

OMG!! R1/R3/R5 never sleeps and resides on DL to respond to sMEGs threads nonstop. OMG!!!

by Anonymousreply 10June 24, 2021 6:26 PM

[quote] Do you complain that Andrew’s parasite family continues to receive funding?

WTF does that have to do with anything? Andrew is not complaining about it and lying about it.

Try to stay on topic or vamoose.

by Anonymousreply 11June 24, 2021 6:29 PM

Maybe start a new thread about Andrew. This thread is about Harry and Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 12June 24, 2021 6:32 PM

R1 Neithet Andrew nor his children receive public monies. Andrew has a trust fund of about $80 million and each of his daughters have a more modest one and are married to very well heeled men fro well heeled families.

by Anonymousreply 13June 24, 2021 8:15 PM

Edo has grifter written all over him, time will tell.

by Anonymousreply 14June 25, 2021 3:15 PM

I thought Edo was a successful business man of some sort. His family owns a giant palace in Italy, no need to grift.

by Anonymousreply 15June 25, 2021 5:51 PM

Why buy a house with 16 bathrooms if you feel financially pressed?

by Anonymousreply 16June 25, 2021 6:14 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!