The Warren Gays Are Still Pissed At Mayor Pete

feminism trumps homophobia because gay men are the reason women hate themselves

but I've noticed he is now using all the inclusivity code speak to ingratiate himself to the intersectionality, woke crowd, who can never be appeased anyway..

read up on why they let off pete lightly for the crimes of his male homosexuality

Another shitty thread by a fat, ugly and unloved DIVISIVE TROLL. Go eat Trump's shit and die

I wish these fucking fuckers would kindly fuck off and then keep fucking off.

They have NO IDEA who the real enemy is.

R4= Warren Gay

“ his status as a White male was not widely discounted because of his sexual orientation. Indeed, as I argue below, his sexual orientation—which intersectionality reminds us is interwoven with his masculinity, Whiteness, religiosity, status as a veteran, and multiple other markers of mainstream identity—conferred an advantage on him when compared to White men such as O’Rourke. Moreover, Buttigieg wielded male privilege in aggressively attacking Senators Warren and Klobuchar without smudging his halo as a nice, well-behaved Midwesterner.128

One could look at this accomplishment narrowly as a victory for (certain) gay men because Buttigieg’s sexuality did not prevent him from accessing and deploying a full measure of White male privilege against women. Buttigieg was permitted to fully embody male identity and privilege, and his outness as gay did not generally undermine his masculine status. However, gender-non-conforming White gay male, queer male of color, queer female, bisexual, transgender, and non-binary candidates are unlikely to be able to pull off this feat”

When the fuck did he aggressively attack Klobuchar? She had been doing that for months before he ever said one thing back to her. And his “attack” on Warren was asking her specific questions about her health care plan. That’s fair game imo.

Oooh I love this permission slip to attack women. Thanks intersectionals!

It’s hard to judge Qanaon when the Warren gays exist and write this garbage in law reviews.

Gay rights without white gay men and terf lesbians.

I give not a penny to "gay" orgs who support this shut. I give money to food kitchens instead. Which are btw in my city mostly feeding people of color.

I'm a reactionary gay man!

The Warren gays are Yaaas Kweens.

[quote]the combination of his gay identity and his alignment with masculinity norms generally assigned to heterosexual men, and by taking aim at more senior and qualified women candidates, namely Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar.

But, he did kind of do those things. He went after the women much more vociferously than he went after the men in the race. And, while it's understandable that he kept talking about his military experience in a political race, it did have the effect of masculinizing him in the eyes of the average voter who would certainly have had a problem with a more feminine gay man.

Whew gurl, I think it's time to LET IT GO

R13, No he didn’t. His biggest spat was with Bernie at the Nevada debate. Do you not remember when he handed Beto’s ass to him over gun control?

We really do need a polygamourous genderqueer of color to run for the Democratic nomination. They would definitely show that GLBTQ+ (OTHER THAN GAYS AND LESBIANS) have been truly liberated.

That Warren black trans that worked on her campaign really hated gays and Asians. Remember them? I don’t think anything ever came of that. Elizabeth Warren is horrid.

R17, That is true. The media did make Bernie fire one of his gay staff members because he made a crack about Warren on his Twitter account though.

But that’s a gay staff member, R18. Gays are treated—like trash.

Okay yeah from that preview, what the hell is this doing in a law review journal??

The University of Buffalo School of Law? You're kidding right?

He was for sure the target of some of the most intense and vile online hate posts, more than it seemed a lot of the other candidates. I know Kamala was smeared with the “cop” bs and Warren the “snake” shit but goddamn it felt so intense for Pete.

I still remember one of the most vile ones was the campaign manager for Julian Castro who seemed so obsessed it was kind of concerning.

You just can tell an effeminate loser wrote this piece. It's unbelievable how fem gays are out of touch, lost in their female centric cliques.

Masculinity has nothing to do with sexual orientation and it's not a hetero feature. It's homophobic to think so. Maybe if the fem or dyke that wrote this piece should go out more and meet different people other than his friends clowning women to be accepted.

Not everyone in the world is doing something to annoy you.

Part of what I liked about Pete's campaign was that his "attacks" were policy based. Elizabeth Warren attacked Pete's integrity, she insinuated through their donor atracks and the McKinsey insinuations that he could be bought and that he was unethical. They were attacking his character. She is awful.

[quote] feminism trumps homophobia because gay men are the reason women hate themselves

a) I don't hate myself.

b) If I did, I can't imagine gay men having anything to do with it.

c ) The Adrienne Rich quote at r1 is from 1979. Both lesbian and gay male culture looked a lot different at the time. No one should be using that in an argument today and if it's included in the law review article (which I did not read), it doesn't belong there.

I'll admit the wine cave reads gave me life 😁

The premise of that article seems absurd, but I wouldn't blame Warren or Klobuchar for that. The article was written by some guy from Berkeley law school; don't think the women who ran against Pete had anything to do with it or would agree with its main points.

Kween yaasss ^^^.

[quote]gave me life

Weeeerq!

Fuck Elizabeth Warren.

She ran the most toxic campaign second only to Bernie Sanders. Meanwhile the media covered for her every step of the way and excused her obvious hypocrisy.

Warren really went off the deep end with the whole populism and identity politics thing. Throwing around LatinX, Sylvia Rivera/Marsha, "wine caves"....all when she herself had attended a couple of "wine cave" events herself and was a Republican for YEARS. She was stupid to think her attacks would work.

They identify as QUEER, OP. You knew that!

[quote]Kween yaasss

What is this shit and why is it all over DL now?

The fact that they identify as "queers" tells me all I need to know.

Yaaas R34.

Honestly, I would have thought I'd support Pete just because he's gay, but he annoyed the hell out of me. He was so determined to appeal to a bunch of GOP old ladies in Iowa and to every white pundit on CNN and MSNBC. He was showing up on TV more than Flo from Progressive. I wondered why the media was so determined to make him happen. Though Warren got almost as much coverage as Pete did. At the end of the primary, I couldn't stand the sight of either of them.

Fuck intersectionality. At this point I am for gays and lesbians (of all colors) and that's it. I am opposed to racism and religious bias, but this fucking alphabet soup of every misfit under the sun, including straight hookers, can eat shit right out my ass.

If it weren't for white gay men and lesbians, we wouldn't have made the progress we have, and the organizations that have been hijacked wouldn't exist.

I think Pete would look great in a black leather harness, black boots and a leather cap.

Don’t forget R32 she was going to have a trans child interview all of her potential secretary of education pics.

r37, You were a Warren gay. “Almost as much coverage as Pete got” are you kidding? The week after Pete won Iowa, Warren got more coverage than he did for her Fourth place finish. She got tons more coverage than he did and it was all fawning unlike Pete’s which was all about how black people hate him and how working for the same organization Warren once worked for makes him corrupt.

R41 I dislike Pete. I loathe Warren. I supported Beto and then Biden - both of whom the media absolutely trashed.

Damn some of you all got really invested in this. I knew neither of them would never be president so I just watched for fun.

R42, The media did not trash Biden. While they spent all their energy attacking Pete for taking donations from well off donors, they were ignoring the fact that Biden did the same thing.

R42 only likes straight white guys. Shocking.

[quote] Don’t forget [R32] she was going to have a trans child interview all of her potential secretary of education pics.

I forgot about that! Fucking ridiiculous. If she was trying to go after Bernie voters....well, that didn't go so well. And I thought it was hilarious when the NYT was so bent out-of-shape when she lost. She didn't lose because of sexism. She lost because she sucked.

No, the media did trash Biden quite a bit. Let's not forget how the media announced his candidacy as over when he lost the earlier states in the primaries and you also had people in the media/other Dems calling for people to believe Tara Reade's accusations against him.

Congratulations, OP. You brought all these anti-Warren trolls out, who have specious arguments and are misogynists on top of it.

Intersectional = everything has to be about race

LGBTQ must equal the rights of trans sex workers of color

Feminism must equal the rights of people of color

Intersectionality is Orwellian doubletalk because there is no intersection. It’s sublimating every other progressivism movement to the fight against racism.

Correct R49.

My suspicion is that the concept of intersectionality was secretly created by a right-wing think-tank to tear apart the left.

"It’s hard to judge Qanaon when the Warren gays exist and write this garbage in law reviews."

Yes, writing garbage in law reviews is exactly the same as trying to overthrow our democracy.

“Mayor Pete doesn’t wear a tiara and a jock to work. We hate him!”

Being gay is still a bigger political liability than being a woman, even among Democrats.

R54, that list is an inverse correlation to how acceptable it is to be openly prejudiced against that group in society. What people say and what they actually do are two different things.

Ha ha, OP. Tough shit!

[quote] The University of Buffalo School of Law? You're kidding right?

The author is not at Buffalo.

Prior to joining UC Berkeley, Robinson was Professor of Law at UCLA. Robinson graduated with honors from Harvard Law School (1998), after receiving his B.A. summa cum laude from Hampton University (1995).

Russell Robinson teaches at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Robinson’s scholarly and teaching interests include antidiscrimination law, race, gender, and sexuality, law and psychology, constitutional law, and media and entertainment law. Russell does research in Public Law. His most recent publication is 'THE AFTERLIFE OF HOMOPHOBIA'.

And he is black so you are racist if you don't agree with him.

Case in point: The Pod Save America Warrenbros still refuse to mention Pete's name like he's Voldemort. Only their housefag Jon Lovett mentions him on his personal show.

Liz who lied about being Native American and Amy who was physically violent towards her staff. But Pete’s the bad guy.

I’m sure he calls him Mayo Pete.

We all know that gay white males did nothing but take responsibility for everything queer POC did.

Warren is a hypocritical twat. Can’t stand her.

[quote]If it weren't for white gay men and lesbians, we wouldn't have made the progress we have, and the organizations that have been hijacked wouldn't exist.

If trans women of color had actually been in charge of the gay rights movement, homosexuality would still be illegal.

Funny how Gay men are now seen as privileged and Queer people are not, when most “queer” people are straight people who just call themselves queer for attention.

In what way is Pete even masculine? He is short intellectual married to a school teacher. He played up his military experience for the same reason Tulsi did: its good politics. And, he attached Bernie and Beto as much as he attacked Warren and Amy. The only person he didn’t attack was Biden, who no one else attacked either.

I know OP is a troll, so it's no surprise that he's lying about "Warren gays" being responsible. It's not "Warren gays" who started all this crap about Pete, it was all the leftists, the Tulsi variety and the Bernie variety and all lefties in between.

Yeah, to this day they're still saying "Pete isn't really gay, he's a CIA operative who used identity politics to fool centrists and Democrats" kinds of things, but they're also saying "Biden is a pedo" and "Bill Clinton flew the Lolita Express 147 times" and "Kamala isn't really black." They're also calling Warren "Pocahontas" and if you point out that's racist, they'll start posting videos of themselves crying and saying "How can you care about racist slurs when my sister's insulin is expensive?!"

But nobody cares. Nobody is listening anymore except the other conspiracy-minded idiot pseudo leftists. Beyond a few corners of social media, they're basically invisible.

[quote[] Warren is a hypocritical twat. Can’t stand her.

How times change. A few months ago that would get a person red-tagged or at least greyed out and unable to post.

[quote]My suspicion is that the concept of intersectionality was secretly created by a right-wing think-tank to tear apart the left.

No, it's an old academic method used to interrogate sociocultural events, protest movements, literature, movies, things like that.

It's a perfectly valid concept; if someone is gay and disabled, they have two intersectional sociocultural issues to contend with, and they'll statistically have more trouble getting help from doctors and the government than someone who is straight and disabled.

The problem is that Repugs hate gays and disabled people both, so they scream to high heaven about "gay black lesbians in wheelchairs" like they always do, and that still gets media attention, somehow. The tankies on the left also do the same, because they're of the "you have to be in perfect health without any disadvantages so you can contribute to society like a good worker and not drain our resources" type. A lot of the Tulsi & Greenwald kind of lefties are just baby Republicans, give them a decade and they won't be couching their homophobia in complaints about "identity politics" anymore.

That doesn't mean the concept is not valid, it just means various political groups warp it for their own agendas.

R66, This guy donated to Warren twice.deck records confirm. How much of a Warren kiss ass can he be in this section?

Recognizing the tightrope of gendered perceptions, Warren initially avoided attacking her rivals and focused on demonstrating competence by rolling out a series of highly detailed policy plans.137 For months, pundits had predicted that Warren would be a formidable debater and anticipated her attacking rivals Sanders and Biden. Yet for most of the primary season, she avoided confronting them, even when Biden shouted at her and tried to take credit for her signature achievement. When a story leaked that Sanders had told Warren, while she was deciding whether to run for president, that a woman could not win after Clinton’s loss, Warren, seemingly cowed by the threat of Bernie’s sexist supporters, sought to de-escalate tensions. 140 While Warren was typically ranked among the strongest debaters, her performances as muted and solid, but not exciting.141 performances as muted and solid, but not exciting.141 In addition to her copious policy plans, her other signature was a promise to take a “selfie” photograph with as many voters as approached her, which consumed many hours of her time. This high-touch strategy also allowed her to demonstrate warmth and accessibility and sought to combat stereotypes that she was angry and elitist.142

*fec redords

Why am I not surprised the person denying a Warren gay is behind this article is also the person defending the e bogus concept of intersectionality?

[quote] Liz who lied about being Native American

To be fair, I think it’s 100% believable that she was told she has Indian ancestry. And it turns out she actually does, although even then the trolls sneered about that.

I didn’t support her or Pete in the primaries, but I like them both and think it’s pointless to publish articles like the one linked in OP. It’s clear that particularism is alive and well in the Democratic Party.

[quote] Don’t forget [R32] she was going to have a trans child interview all of her potential secretary of education pics.

LOL, forgot about that. For the most part, I really liked Warren and for a long time, I considered myself a Warren gay (though ultimately I was relieved and happy that Biden got the nom), but she did go off the deep end on occasion.

Warren or Pete would have handed the election to Trump on a silver platter. Which is why I never understood why the allegedly 'liberal' media was promoting them constantly to the detriment of every other candidate. Did they hope one of them would get the nom so Trump could easily take them down and ensure their Trump ratings bonanza never ended?

NBC execs hosted fundraisers for Pete and Maddow couldn't stop interviewing Warren. They wanted to hold onto their Trump.

r74, The liberal media declared Pete a racist who was a corporate sellout for the last 7 or so months of the primary. Maybe you mean Warren alone who the media elitists not-so-openly endorses and sobbed over when she lost miserably the Fray after Super Tuesday.

Pete received a very dismissive farewell even after he made way for Biden to take the delegates without any competition.

I think the hate for Pete comes from "I want my gays to be prancing queens in feather boas, goddammit!" A regular guy who happens to be gay (which is what so many of us are) is just too much for people. They want stereotypes.

I think the hate for Pete comes from the fact that giant ego thought he was qualified to be President because he'd been the mayor of a small town which hadn't elected a Republican in 30 years. He got 7,000 votes in his last election. And working for McKinsey? Talk about poison.

The two most important gay politicians in the country - Jared Polis and Sean Patrick Maloney - both endorsed their former Congress colleague Beto O'Rourke.

Today, the law reviews.

Tomorrow, the courts.

That's your shit to deal with r77. Pete is an intelligent man who has some great ideas.

r77 Jared Polis didn't endorse Beto. And Maloney worked with Beto closely for many years in Congress and is a close friend of Beto, so obviously endorsed him. Beto's home state Texas' Austin Mayor endorsed Pete on the very first day. How about that ?

Pete being Maltese has a thicker cock then Beto but Beto is clearly longer. I really seasawed between them in the primaries.

Beta's hot, but Pete's a true Alpha!

Law Reviews are shit. Law professors have no training in academic scholarship, no peer review, and little sense of ethics or humility.

[quote] A regular guy who happens to be gay (which is what so many of us are) is just too much for people. They want stereotypes.

So? Everyone who isn't a straight white male has to deal with fighting stereotypes. Pete isn't singled out in that regard.

White gays live rent free in the minds of leftist schmucks like this guy

Mayor Pete wasn't allowed to be married until 2015. Warren was allowed.

Mayor Pete could be fired for being gay with no protection until 2020. Warren couldn't be fired because she was a woman.

His suffering > her "suffering"

Oh [italic]please[/italic] Miss Mary r86. Have you [italic]seen[/italic] Chasten? His suffering has only just started.

Elizabeth Warren is such a cunt.

If Warren had spent less time up Sanders asshole and doing more than loving the attention she was getting shitting all over Bloomberg, perhaps she might have had more time to connect with a greater amount of voters. As it was, she couldn't even carry her own damn state.

Again: her own state said: "No fucking way." She came in third there. Her fans can write all the articles they want but they can't change reality.

I'm sure Secretary of Transportation Peter Buttigieg isn't bothered. Too busy being a cabinet member for President Joe Biden. 😎

[quote]If Warren had spent less time up Sanders asshole and doing more than loving the attention she was getting shitting all over Bloomberg,

The Sanders thing I agree with. The Bloomberg thing, she should have been proud of herself and Biden should have thanked her for doing it. People forget how Bloomberg's money was putting him in a place he shouldn't have been to challenge (eventually) Biden.

She did what no one else could do: very surgically knocked him out cold.

He never recovered.

One of her problems was appearing to be too far left. While she isn't as far left as Bernie, for a while there, she was really going for every single disenfranchised group out there. I do wonder what would have happened had Trump not been able to attack her with the Native American stuff. That haunted her every speech. Going for "one legged, latina lesbians from South Dakota between the ages of 24 and 16" did her no favors. Also her beef with Sanders. You can't have that happening with someone who you're very close to politically.

Liz Warren came in 3rd in the Democratic primary in her home state Massachusetts. She came in 4th in the 2 other states she lived in: Oklahoma and Texas. She should be humiliated.

I loved it when the day after Warren dropped out her campaign officials started attacking Pete on twitter. They seriously think he was why she couldn’t connect with anyone except intersectional woke feminists./_

When she dropped out, all these female SJWs were posting statuses on facebook about how they "have the right to be upset right now!".

There are also many parts of this world where Pete could not travel openly with his husband without risking his life.

These intersectionality obsessed twats conveniently happen to forget that.

r94 they live in their little bubbles and have no idea about a lot of real world things.

Lesbians perform better in election than gay men, yet THESE PEOPLE would never dare argue lesbians enjoy any privilege whatsoever that gay men don't have, like they're doing now, based on a sample size of ONE (= Pete).

R 37 I'm with r38. We thought society was moving to a post homophobic state, but the alphabet soup had completely detailed that. I too am a "good liberal" but like r38 now I put my neck out for gays only. We are heading for cultural siege, it's all we can do.

Warren also used fake Affirmative Action credentials to get hired at Harvard. How does anyone have credibility after that!

She also wanted a trans child to vet the Secretary of Education.

No one, outside of a few fringe voters, wanted her. She came in at the pack of the pack in liberal Mass. She's deluded and calculating.

Warren was a Republican all the years she lived in Texas. She lived in Austin while Ann Richards was governor. She only flipped to being a Democrat when she moved to Boston where being a Republican would have hurt her career.

I agree with r38. It's insane now. I, as a gay man, have nothing in common with a trans pansexual genderqueer who sucks dick for money under the highway overpass. These people can just fuck right off.