20,000 WWs!

[quote] SYKE,

Oh, dear!

OP = Serena Wiliams

You got this, OP.

20,000 out of how many posts? 2,000,000? It's the percentage that matters, not the raw numbers.

That better not be some sort of implication that I’m a Russian asset recruited by the SVR, R3.

[QUOTE] 20,000 out of how many posts? 2,000,000? It's the percentage that matters, not the raw numbers.

You have started 500 threads which have received 35793 replies. You have received 20006 WW votes and have posted 8043 replies to threads.

[quote] Saul Berenson

Bullshit, Boris!

Is this where we brag about who's is bigger?

Ha! I have started less than half as many threads as you and have a higher WW percentage than you! Ha!

[QUOTE] Bullshit, Boris!

You forgot "Jealous, Bitches?" OP

Yeah, r9, but he averages 71 replies per thread, that’s notable.

[QUOTE] Ha! I have started less than half as many threads as you and have a higher WW percentage than you! Ha!

But you’re a bottom, R9. I’m a top and everything I do means more.

OP, I just checked my stats:

[quote]You have started 378 threads which have received 21581 replies. You have received 21154 WW votes and have posted 7724 replies to threads.

Take a seat.

R14 must be Meryl.

Sorry, OP. Screenshot or it is a pack of lies.

That, or you like your own posts to the point you have blisters on your "like" finger".

No one is that fucking witty.

R14 that’s because you started all those stupid Robert Mueller impeachment threads probably. I had to put in that work to get mine.

Won't someone WW me for once so I can brag?

Erm, no r17

Happy to help r18 :-)

[quote] Is this where we brag about who's is bigger?

No, this is the thread where we brag about knowing the difference between who’s and whose.

I’ll give one R18 if you promise not to become a boorish brag like OP

OP, are you Soupy Sales?

R18 = Darfur Orphan begging for sustenance

[quote] R14 must be Meryl.

R14 is Mace Windu.

OP=the gurl with something extra

[quote] OP=the gurl with something extra

Extra fat!

What an obscure reference, r26. Come sit next to me.

Well, we know for sure it isn't Your Millennial Fuckhead so at least there's that. Then again, I can see him being a "self liker", so I could be wrong.

I wanna sit next to John Davidson.

OP is an attention whoring cunt.

OP is Mia Farrow!

[quote]You have started 500 threads

[quote]and have posted 8043 replies to threads.

Jesus, are you [italic]that[/italic] bored you have nothing to do but post on DL?

My. That's hours and hours and hours of WWing yourself, OP, hitting refresh and pounding the button over and over.

When was your carpal tunnel surgery?

It's the ratio of WW upvotes to replies that matters, not simply the raw numbers. For example, r14 has received 2.73 WW votes per reply. r6 has 2.49.

I'm not a big thread starter - I've only started three myself. Am more of a responder, even if my raw numbers are less than others. But I have a nice 3.16 ratio of WW upvotes.

Muriel will vaporize this thread.

I ceased to be impressed when I realized you can WW your own posts.

What does WW even stand for?

Wit & Wisdom.

Am I missing something r12 or do our stats not tell us how many threads we've posted in? I don't understand how you got that percentage.

I have a 3,92 ratio, but I have a life outside the internet, so my total numbers are much lower.

What’s that like?

We care about ratios now ?

Why can’t Millenials fucking spell?

Neither OP nor R14 have been outside of their mum's basement in years.

[quote] Why can’t Millenials fucking spell?

Irony.

[quote]I don't understand how you got that percentage.

He took his WW votes and divided that by his posted replies.

No, sorry r47, that doesn't equal the average number of replies posted per thread.

To know the average number of replies someone posted to a thread, we'd have to know (a) how many threads they posted in and (b) total number of replies. We have (b) but we don't have (a).

Number of WW votes doesn't equal the number of threads he's posted in.

I have 27, 998 WWs.

And I've only been here for two glorious years.

I was told there’d be no math.

My ratio rounds out to 3.3.

More wit. More wisdom.

I have 19,906 WW you stupid CUNT FLAP!!!

Eat my cooter!

Not that I would DEIGN to care what others thought of me.... but where would I find this if I’m on an iPhone?

^^ I guess everyone has me blocked : (

R48 - I misunderstood and thought you were asking about what others were talking about - the average WWs per reply.

To get average replies per thread, divide the number of threads you started by the total replies. (For example in my case, I started only 2 threads and got a total of 52 replies, for an average of 26.)

I'm now up to 31,873 WW's.

It's so wonderful to be appreciated here.

I'm wisely trying to suppress my wit on this thread because I don't want the OP to have her feelings hurt. She seems brittle.

I beat you OP. Not that anyone cares.

[quote] You have started 593 threads which have received 12287 replies. You have received 25479 WW votes and have posted 13788 replies to threads.

May I congratulate every fucking one of you for your rapier wit and I still hate you. Yes, even you. And, especially you.

Op, around these parts you cant be witty enough, you can't be smart enough, and you can't even be slutty enough.

In other words, you'll never be good enough.

Now, go kill yourself, because....

You're dead to me!!!

Just you & your alts. The gang all high-tailed it here when you'd grab their ip address & hacked them

Pest

Thousands of alts on Datalounge, Daily Mail, YouTube & let's not forget Reddit! Although, u/datalounge gives away the secret stalkings on r/datalounge, gotta say u/delusionalcookie has to be the creepiest! Sex w/a pokemon fan fict on numerous platforms

Oh, they're coming for you... ....

[quote]To get average replies per thread, divide the number of threads you started by the total replies.

That would get you the average number of replies received in threads you started.

I thought someone earlier was claiming they knew how many times OP had posted in every thread he participated in. If it's number of replies he gets on average for each thread he starts, that makes more sense.

Gurls, GURLS!

You're ALL witty cunts.

20,000 WWs for 8,000+ posts is a decent ratio (better than two per post).

I refuse to believe op got 25 WW for this lame thread. Obviously, she is manipulating the system.

Smell me, bitches.

[quote] You have started 1493 threads which have received 52809 replies. You have received 38376 WW votes and have posted 26071 replies to threads.

Syke? Bitch you deserve DOA, not W&W.

I FFd you, OP, to balance things out.

r65 you have a rather paltry 1.47 ration between your replies and WW upvotes. Others here have posted much higher.

I don't cater to a mass audience, doll. Never have, never will.

[quote] you have a rather paltry 1.47 ration

What the hell is he going to do with that? We need more!

You have started 188 threads which have received 4152 replies. You have received 34730 WW votes and have posted 22999 replies to threads.

I'm up to 47,297 WWs!

Thank you all for recognizing me for the wit I am.

1.5 ratio r71. Nothing to brag about.

OP =

Are there other actors who can pull off hysterical perkiness as well as Sally?

Another hospital stay then followed by prison.

Enjoy your time as a weak chinned, no-lipped free man..for now

58,000! Just now!

Jealous, OP??????

Wait! I can't believe it!

59,000!!!!

Up to 77, 252 W&Ws now!

How about you, OP. Huh? Huh? Huh?

How about you?

I have 29,192 WWs