Watch in awe as Nancy Pelosi hands Wolf Blitzer’s ass to him

He is a moron but she owed it to viewers to explain the details, not get bitchy with him about it and pull out that ad-hominem "apologist" bullshit.

He seriously is an idiot. I've seen him on the actual Celebrity Jeopardy. I thought at the time like, as with applicants for law enforcement, one had to fail an IQ test to have Wolf Blitzer's job.

Blitzer frequently makes assumptions about what is factual. Just because a person or two who are not in the know may have said something to him in passing, it is not necessarily true, so she was right to correct him, especially since he was insisting.

It sounded like she was explaining things when the clip cut off. And she should get “bitchy”, Wolf wanted his gotcha moment and Nancy wasn’t having it. Plus he has the IQ of a fruit fly.

Blitzer was a complete asshat that entire interview, right up until the end (not shown in that clip) where he said he hoped help would come soon, “we all see the rising homeless people on the streets...” whereupon. Nancy cut him off to ask him “And have you fed them? We have, Wolf. We have.”

Nance looks great there.

He deserves to be treated like shit for daring to question any Democrat. As far as I’m concerned, you need to have him fired from CNN for disgraceful behavior that borders on treason.

Here’s the end of the interview where he refers to people in the streets begging for food:

Robotic and cold. He takes himself too seriously. I never liked Blitzer. And did I mention, ugly as fuck?

No, r7 he deserves to be treated like every Republican treats every Journalist for pretending that the Trump/McConnell Party gives a flying fuck about anyone but rich people and that any deal with those fuckers is bound to be a good deal just cause they're so gosh darned awesome and caring.

Shut him down like a salon!

She really does not like her authority questioned.

She doesn't suffer fools, r12.

[quote] She really does not like her authority questioned.

Neither does anyone who is not a deplorable. You will fall into line right fucking now.

R14 = Trumptard assbag = GFY

Well I for one was awed by the fact that our Nancy seemed so spry, alert, and cognitive in this clip. She has seemed the exact opposite prior.

Not a good look for Nancy and the Democrats right now.

I stopped watching him, and CNN, the day he repeatedly (like twenty times in fifteen minutes) showed the clip of Hillary Clinton having trouble getting into her car during the 911 event in 2016. That told me everything I needed to know about the man.

R17, FUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!

Clips like this are a preview of what will happen when the Democrats can no longer blame Trump for everything.

Concern trolls galore in this thread.

Troll better.

WB is unable to talk and breathe at the same time.

It's hilarious that this Republican shill whines about people begging for food on the streets. This was clearly bait to make Nancy look uncaring in order to stick it to Trump. It's this shill's masters who screwed those people out of jobs and decent income in the first place.

She looks like Lucille Bluth in OP's picture.

I thought she was Lucille Blush!

My bad.

R7 please fuck off with your trolling. We know you're not even gay.

You're the troll, R26, for daring to question any Democrat for any reason whatsoever.

R19, bless you! Tissue?

No one ever won an argument against an Italian.

I watched this happen and loved it. It's high time that someone called out CNN for their Republican apologists. Wolf was getting on my nerves with this phony pie-in-the-sky, "Well, why don't you just call them?" attitude, followed by his parroting Andrew Yang's talking points. Nancy was right to point it out: Yang's not a negotiator. He's not even credible. And still Wolf tried with the concern routine. He was pissed, and it showed, and it was brilliant. "You don't know what you're talking about." And later, from him, "I *am* compassionate."

They're in the TisSue, r28.

Radical left Nancy Pelosi is getting ornery! 🤡

Stop watching CNN. It’s toxic garbage.

Lots of triggered and anxious Trump fans in the thread. 😂🤣

She's corrupt as the day is long but looks amazing for 80. He's a fucking idiot.

Wolf has a great look with the hair and beard and a cool name. And that’s about it.

I only watch CNN for Brianna, r33.

I love Nancy Pelosi. I think she'd make a far better president than Biden, but this wasn't a victory for her. News outlets and pundits everywhere are calling her out over this spat. She could have handled this exchange much better. We all have bad days but damn. We don't need this so close to the election.

[Quote ]She's corrupt as the day is long but

Watch your mouth, R35, or I will reach thru the phone and punch your lights out.

I love Brianna, R37!

Wonder what happened to Brooke Baldwin. CNN took her off until after the election. She claimed it wasn't her choice.

Blitzerkrieg

R34, since I may be one of the “trolls” of which you speak posting on this thread, please note that I’ve contributed well to the Biden/Harris campaign (& have the 24/7 texts & e-mails to prove it), but I’ll be damned if I’m going to be MAGA-like & fall into place no matter what our Democratic leaders say & do.

Uh...huh

He's the main reason I have not watched CNN in almost 20 years.

R38, of course the news pundits are mad. They're being held accountable.

"So poor and so black"

Best comment on Twitter about this:

News & Gifs @YessGossip

The media is going to both sides us into a dictatorship.

I was not really following what either of them were trying to say.

I am a fan of both Blitzer and Pelosi.

It's the reporters' job to ask questions on behalf of the PUBLIC, and it's politicians' job to give interviews in order to inform the PUBLIC or make their case about something. Anything personal that goes on, like a reporter attacking the pol or the pol evading the question or using their appearance to grandstand is bullshit.

I don't have time for that. I'm not there to watch two individuals argue, like I'm watching a wrestling match and cheering for "my side". I want info, not feel-good drama.

That's what Wolf did R 49. It appeared to me that Pelosi was argumentative and much too angry for the circumstances. Wolf asked a legitimate question.

Fuck Wolf and all the journalists inquiries! Republicans are not held accountable for shit, ever! Why should we Democrats be held to a different standard?!

She came off horribly here. People are starting to get pissed at her. She knows she’s never going to get what she wants. Accepting 1.8 is better than nothing. It’s the right thing to do even if it is handing Trump a win.

^^Evil Republican CUNT

Nancy is too used to CNN only throwing her softballs.

She is the dumbass with that shit eating grin on her face. She knows no struggles. I'm tempted to not vote at all as all she is worried about is people getting a check with trump's name on it before election day.

The press is more than willing to repeat Republican bullshit talking points.

[quote]I'm tempted to not vote at all ...

OK Boris. Now kindly wipe Trump's crusty shit out from the corners of your mouth and get the fuck out of here.

Not Boris, trump hater and possible non-voter in a swing state. These politicians have no clue. Politicized per her own letter quoted and she would not listen to the facts. She knows nothing. Politics is all ego.

Fuck off and keep drinking the kool aid. They can all fuck off.

Why the fuck does he always have to shout everything?

If something doesn't happen by the end of the week, I am not voting. I'm done.

[quote]R38 News outlets and pundits everywhere are calling her out over this spat.

Where?

God forbid a woman does’t stay meek and docile - -

And if the Dems win they can change the plan. Duh. She does not want people seeing trump "helping." Politicizing people's economic situation. Simple and selfish.

This is nothing. It’s not even a hill of beans. Wolfe accomplished nothing.

They lost a dem voter in NC.

I cannot stand that CNN rolls out Wolf Blitzer to scream whenever they do coverage of major events. I dread every election when he announces predictions at the top of his lungs.

That said, this exchange is one they've done many times before. Nancy cannot go on the offense, now that the pressure is reaching a critical level. Dems and Rethugs alike have had months to generate this past due stimulus, and she cannot take it out on anyone but those colleagues she mentioned. CNN's reporting aint got shit to do with millions of people about to get put out on the street this winter.

You know, she really doesn't seem like she is nearly 80.

I guess that's because she is 80, but ehh, you get my point.

"She came off horribly here."

Only to assholes like you.

Still love her.

Politicizing cunt.

The Repugs could have done a deal back in May. Fuck them.

No matter how you slice it, there should have been some stimulus money since May. Why does it all have to be a 'package deal'- or nothing?

The $1200 should be retroactive back to May, June, July, August, September, and October = $7200. Corporate Welfare cheats get billions they don't need.

I just don't get how ANYONE - and I don't care how left-wing you are - could vote for her. She is a programmed, insane idiot. I wish he would have asked her what her net worth is when she was going on about needy people and their income.

So much pressure. I would not want to be a politician on either "side", especially not at this time. She's 80 years old and needs to have a clear overview of so many numbers.

Well, not everyone is so generous when it comes to this Pelosi's performance... By the way, let's remember that she has ensured that three stimulus bills pass, and over 90% of the money goes to corporations and oligarchs!

Oh, but she had a condescending tone, so she is a political genius!

After this interview, Nancy must be so angry she has to go to her favourite spa or salon to relax. And god forbid anyone set her up for not wearing a mask!

In the entire interview, Nancy reminded me of so many women I met in my life. First, when Wolf challengered her, she got all restless like the that bitch Sandy in high school when I called her out for stealing my wallet! Then, when Wolf doubled down his accusation, Nancy turned into my history teacher when I pointed out she was wrong. That "how dare you challenge me" face, it surely brings back old memory. When she referred Andrew Yang as "lovely", oh, that is my grandma when she described her neighbor. When she used the words "lovely" or "adorable", it mean "I don't like her and I don't care about that person." Lovely.

I really thought the "they are SO poor and they are SO black" comment during Katrina would get him axed but the motherfucker still has a career, it's incomprehensible.

“Dems and Rethugs alike have had months to generate this past due stimulus, and she cannot take it out on anyone but those colleagues she mentioned. “

I’m more than sure that you are aware that Democrats had a new stimulus bill on Cunt McConnell’s desk back in May. But Republicans sat on it, let benefits expire, precisely to create this whole situation we’re in right now.

So why doesn’t Wolf Blitzer go after the Republicans?

R77 probably told his English teacher they were wrong too.

Oh, dear!

Old people have less filter and just blurt out stuff.

True.

R80 shut up my darling. My English is perfect the way it is.

Does anybody know the date Blitzer declared himself King Wolf I of CNN?

People like R80 only speak one language then go around and judge others for their "imperfect english".

So true R79, McConnell also said that he would not bring any new stimulus bill to a Senate vote (even a “Trump approved” version. So why should Nancy acquiesce? At this point any compromise agreement is performative.

Handing Wolf Blitzer's ass to him is so easy, even a child can do it.

I watch Wolf and Erin Burnett every night. My problem with Wolf is that he acknowledges that people need help from this stimulus package but he never mentions all of the bullshit Republicans have tried to sneak through. In fact, neither does Pelosi for that matter which I think is the Dems weakness. We all know that Trump is a used car salesman but giving SPECIFIC DETAILS should be first and foremost.

I mean...letting people know that Republicans want to protect corporations from being held responsible for unsafe work conditions that may contribute to employees catching Coronvirus is something that people should know.

[quote]Handing Wolf Blitzer's ass to him is so easy, even a child can do it.

I doubt a child could even lift that flabby thing.

The Dems already passed a second stimulus back in May. Why should Pelosi twist herself into pretzels just to do what The GOP wants?

"How dare she get angry! How dare she take umbrage at anything a reporter may ask! She's an ANGRY WOMAN, and we just can't have that.; so unbecoming on a woman."

Blitzer used to be mean to Bill Hemmer on CNN.

Get real, Nancy! You're not that important. Your job has gone to your wooden, empty head.

Get it together and get people the help they need. You can do it - even though you don't want to.

I'm assuming your best friends aren't telling you, r93, but your posts reek of severe flatulence and decomp.

You deserve to get yelled at and abused for questioning Democrats.

If she is part of the 1%, then she has fucking earned it.

I think there are some good points on the thread, but here's the thing: Wolf didn't come with any specifics like "the repigs are meeting your XYZ demands, yet you reject a deal" - which is a valid point. Rather, he came at her in a very condescending, heavy handed way, as if "people are rummaging through garbage cans and you're quibbling over a tax credit for pet goats." I don't blame her for being pissed- he was totally out of line, almost "Chuck Todd-like", if you will. That said, if you love Nancy, I was glad to see her swipe back at Blitzer and smack him hard and if you hate her, she's a shrill, crazy old lady. This exchange was a blip on the screen in a fast moving world.

The Democrats know what’s best for everyone, so the media needs to fall in fucking line.

Wolf Blitzer needs to lose his job over this.

Oh, and Shahid Buttar is just another Republican mole.

Cancel Wolfe !

Once Harris is president we send him to the gulags!

I do not see her as a shrill, old lady. I see her as a politician using it for political gain and votes. Too keep a "trump" check from getting into voters hands. She had no specific answers either.

Fuck all of them.

She deserves to be the richest member of Congress. Sexism is the reason she’s only the eighth richest member of Congress.

The trolls on this thread are proving their republican't cred.

Everything that has been proven true about them is now being projected onto the Democrats.

r102 eats bloody stools...

^ for r101

How much is Wolfie paid by CNN? Is he rich? And, is "Wolf Blitzer" his stage name?

R104’s IQ isn’t that high if he thinks a stolen joke from [italic]Grease[/italic] is the height of cleverness.

It is fucking embarrassing in this day and age when James fucking Corden demonstrates more skills as an interviewer. James fucking Corden!

I'm crying! They can pass something now and fix it when the dems win. Simple. She does not care about people. And I am not a rethug. Carry on when you think people cannot make informed decisions for themselves. Be a lemming.

[quote] And I am not a rethug.

Oh yes you are. This was pure concern trolling. Wolf Blitzer is a moron and a hack, and this was yellow journalism at its worst.

I wasn't going for cleverness, r107, I was going for accurate.

She's such a bitch.

Think what you like.

[quote]Watch in awe as Nancy Pelosi hands Wolf Blitzer’s ass to him

If only she had sliced it off first.

[quote]And, is "Wolf Blitzer" his stage name?

His real name is Leslie.

R112 is such a misogynistic racist prick. Die in a grease fire!

r110 is r112. Figure that out.

No, r117, r110 is not r112.

It's the Datalounge r118. What's to figure out?

Wolf Blitzer is a terrible journalist, asking flippant and impertinent questions to distract from the fact that Trump, the GOP, and all opposition to Democrats is 100% complicit for everything wrong right now.

On a similar note, I’m tired of people complaining that the rent or the taxes are too high in San Francisco. They need to be high to keep deplorables from moving in.

He should have asked her about the differences in the 1 bills because in the middle of this segment she mentions that they are trying to squeeze in a tax cut for the rich and that they are leaving out tax cuts for families with young children. This is what we need to know. Especially because I saw a Republican this morning on TV accusing Nancy of trying to get in her pet pieces of legislation! This is what we need to know. Launching into attack mode was silly. Ditto asking her why she doesn't pick up the phone to Trump. Really?!

Both the rich and the poor should have to pay 100% of their income in taxes. The speaker of the house knows what’s best for “your” money better than you do.

And in our misogynist world the Daily Mail's headline for this is called

"Pelosi Spectacularly Unravels"

The spectacular sexism still astounds me.

All criticism of straight white liberal women is sexism. They are goddesses to be worshiped like divas!

Yes, we know the rules: Republicans can lie, cheat and steal, and of course berate any journalist when they get, very mildly, called on their bullshit.

Democrats must all accept Republican talking points, must always accept being on the defensive as Republicans are just naturally righteous, true, always filled with the best intentions. And certainly no Democrat must ever, ever call out a journalist on their particular brand of Both Sides Bullshit.

Got it.

We reject those rules. Please and thank you.

Mild questions? This was a fucking ambush orchestrated and calculated by the GOP. Wolf Blitzer is a fucking deplorable. Shut CNN down now or this country will turn into a fascist dictatorship before the end of the month.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I've never understood why Wolf Blitzer is venerated. I've seen way too many interviews where he just gives Republicans, anti-global warming activists and the like a pass.

Fuck him. He knew what has happened with Republicans the past few months and how hard she had tried to secure a deal - then, when they were just about to cut a deal - Trump says no stimulus until after he's reelected.

When that backfired in his face, all of a sudden Trump and Republicans want to pass something through ASAP. Wolf knew this - fucking bastard.

He's a funny looking dude.

He's hawt!

Chris Cillizza was just on with Brianna Keilar. The headline was "Pelosi pushes back against dems calling for stimulus compromise". Nancy mustve known some shade would be thrown.

As much as I dont care for Wolf Blitzer, I agree with Cillizza. None of the questions he asked were unfair or things he wouldn't ask another lawmaker. Cillizza also said policy making shouldnt get caught up in the personality complexes of the lawmakers. ZING!!! Bottom line they need to send out those checks ASAP

From r131 :

You can settle for peanuts now or negotiate for a bigger longer term stimulus package that will actually make a difference.

A short stop gap is fine but bending to unreasonable actors in McConnell and Trump ain’t really a smart negotiating tactic.

Not to mention that the Senate isn't on board with any of this, anyway. And yes, Blitzer absolutely was buying into the Republican framing of the issue.

Think of it this way: Congressional Democrats have identified 100 items at the federal, state, and local level that badly need funding. Of those, Republicans are determined to vote for only 5 of them. If Pelosi agrees on the 5, she doesn't get the other 95. If she refuses to play the game and insists on a real negotiation, she might get as many as 75 of the items.

Obviously, I'm making up the numbers; feel free to substitute the numbers of your choice; the main point stands.

She would have made a terrific President.

And of course this whole negotiation should be happening in May or June, after the House passed their bill, but of course the Republican Senate won't do shit about shit until it's past every reasonable deadline

EXCEPT putting fanatics and corporate whores on the Supreme Court.

Maybe ask the next Republican you have on about that, Wolf.

I'm not sure, but I believe Lawrence addressed Wolf this evening.

Trump 2016, Trump 2020 and beyond! Donald J Trump forever. Pelosi go to hell.

Everybody knows that the GOP wants that stimulus package before election day to score some points and that they would take it all away if they'd win.

Nancy knows this, everybody with 2 working brain cells knows this ... except W Blitzer.

R128 I think Blitzer comes and goes. I've seen more interviews with him calling people on their shit than less. I think maybe this was a strategy to get Pelosi to be more specific than just "Trump is Satan." And it didn't work--of course.

I mean...if you want to see a shady interview on CNN watch Erin Burnett. She shades gloriously. But Cuomo is the quarterback. The way he handled Cruz was beautiful.

Then he should have just asked her to be more specific and let her answer, r139. If you honestly think Wolf didn't have an agenda...well...

Wolf Blitzer is a stupid old shit. Next time he comes for a Democrat without pointing out Republicunt fuckery, they should tear him another leaky asshole. She went far too easy on him.

All the trolls on this thread are going to shoot themselves after Nov. 3 and I am here for it.

I swear there is a constant, well-funded campaign to bash Pelosi every time her name is mentioned, anywhere. It's insane.

Tell me about it r142.

[quote]Pelosi go to hell.

Who needs the competition?

That's because she is is the epitome of a lying, corrupt, old school, out of touch, tone deaf politician out for her own gains and not truly fighting for the American people.

R142 or maybe because she is a corrupted politician and everyone hate her

R142 and I swear there are no funds behind it, some of us can see her for what she is. She has one god, money, she has one political interest, her own fortune.

So many triggered trolls!

R147 Sooo, she's basically like every person who ever existed?

They don't seem to be able to, r149. Perhaps COVID is hitting the troll community hard.

R150: Killing all the right people.

-"You are nothing but a rotten, crooked politician"

Wasn't this a line in Mommy Dearest? Anyway, this applies to Nancy.

Pelosi made a point to say "it will be retroactive"

Do you think people who don't have a dime to the name right now care about that? They want something passed NOW. They need money NOW. Nancy is living in an alternate universe and clearly cannot relate to the average American who has been hurt by the economy due to COVID. I read the other day that NY unemployment can be as low as 150 dollars a week - who can live on that? Forget paying rent or other necessities. You can barely buy food for 150 a week if you are a family of 4.

She doesn't care at all about the people - she only cares about her package that will benefit her special interest groups. Most of that money isn't going to "the people" - it's all special interests calling the shots. She's just awful.

R153, nice regurgitation of Republican talking points. If you want something passed NOW, then talk to Mitch McConnell, who has flatly rejected both the White House proposal and the House Democrat proposal.

Pelosi is, in fact, ready to pass something NOW but it has to be sufficient to do the job and it has to cover what is needed. It has nothing at all to do with "special interest groups" and "most of that money" is indeed going to "the people," so basically, you're full of shit.

Dumbass, some Dems in Congress feel the same way.

Really? So "some Dems in Congress" believe that Nancy Pelosi "only cares about her package that will benefit her special interest groups?" That "Most of that money isn't going to 'the people'?" That "it's all special interests calling the shots?" That Nancy Pelosi is "just awful?" That Nancy Pelosi is "living in an alternate universe?" That Nancy Pelosi "clearly cannot relate to the average American who has been hurt by the economy?"

So tell me: what color is the sky in your world? In ours, it's blue. Dumbass.

On CNN this morning, lemming.

Contents of the House Democrat bill:

- Assistance to state and local governments to help them with their funding shortfalls and increased costs.

- Hazard pay for frontline workers.

- Extension of unemployment benefits.

- Forgiveness of student loan debt.

- Funding for testing, tracing, and treatments.

- Assistance to famers, farmers markets, and local food outlets.

- Protection to renters and homeowners from evictions and foreclosures.

- Direct payments to Americans.

- Housing assistance.

- Increased funding for food stamps.

- Assistance to the U.S. Postal Service.

- Funding for states to beef up election security.

- Assistance for small businesses.

- Assistance for airline industry workers.

- Funding for education and child care.

Yup, this clearly does just "benefit her special interest groups" and "most of that money isn't going to the people." Not.

Pelosi is absolutely right about Blitzer's framing of the question: it's a Republican frame.

Oversimplifying this a bit, what you have is a scenario where House Democrats want 15 things funded; Senate Republicans want 3. If Pelosi gives in and funds those 3 items, it's a total capitulation and she has just handed those Senate Republicans a total victory. Even worse, those other 12 items will never get funded because there is no leverage left to bring Republicans to the bargaining table.

So what Blitzer is [italic]really[/italic] asking is, "Nancy, why don't you just give up those other 12 items and give Republicans exactly what they want?"

Blitzer has been around long enough that he knows how this is supposed to work: the House passes their version; the Senate passes theirs; they meet in conference committee; they negotiate and compromise. So he has no excuse for pulling shit like this and Pelosi has every reason to be pissed at him.

Blitzer is the perfect news face person. He never digs deep, never asks the important questions, always speaks in generalities, and is a republican shit head.

R159, they could negotiate to give $1 trillion EVERY DAY to the banks in record time, but they cannot agree about feeding people who have plunged into poverty and are starving? Blitzer did the right thing questioning Skeletor In A Wig, and she lost all composure and started to shout like the vile fishwife that she is.

And she says it clearly: she doesn't want to provide any relief to American citizens because that would be a political victory for Donald Trump, and would lower the chances of Joe Biden's victory. She is a repulsive sow and a depraved psychopath.

Watch the video below and tell me that this woman isn't a monster and that Wolf Blitzer hasn't done the right thing for once in his entire lifetime...

R161 is such a shithead. GFY.

Well one need only look at his registered name to know that.

Arrian = Aryan?

Brilliant argument, R162. Just brilliant... 😒 My only answer is: eat lots of seafood, because that brain of your is pure, liquified intellectual... Radiance.

Oh, and R163's nonsense is even better! I am a white supremacist because of a random name I chose? Yes, you're right! I guess that's why I am sharing Jimmy Dore videos, because he is the embodiment of leftist activism, supports BLM and non-interventionism and that's what far right neo-Nazis like! Oh my, aren't you an utter and complete genius? 🤣

Well, indulge in your partisan blindness while immoral psychopaths that have become millionaires while in Congress, explote your idiocy for their benefit.

R164 I think the point here is that your rage isn't aimed at ALL parties involved. You seem focused on Pelosi--while not even acknowledging the roles of Moscow Mitch or President Dump. McConnell hasn't passed ANYTHING the Dems have proposed.

Criticism is fine BUT you post as if Pelosi is intentionally doing this to further her career and we're not sure why. Because we ALL know that's a play from the Republican handbook.

[quote]they could negotiate to give $1 trillion EVERY DAY to the banks in record time, but they cannot agree about feeding people who have plunged into poverty and are starving?

ROFL.... You really are genuinely intellectually challenged, aren't you? You completely ignored everything I wrote and simply mindlessly regurgitated your idiotic Republican talking points. Do feel free to come back when you've actually got a rational response to R154, R156, R158, and R159. Until then, you're not worth my time, as I've already handed your ass to you and need more of a challenge.

[quote]And she says it clearly: she doesn't want to provide any relief to American citizens because that would be a political victory for Donald Trump, and would lower the chances of Joe Biden's victory. She is a repulsive sow and a depraved psychopath.

So now you think that blatantly lying is a better tactic than mindless regurgitation of partisan talking point? Yeah, good luck with that.

[quote]Brilliant argument, R162. Just brilliant.

Well, dear, if you insist on posting mindless drivel, you can hardly complain when people respond appropriately.

[quote]Nancy Pelosi only cares about her package

Pics please.

[quote]they could negotiate to give $1 trillion EVERY DAY to the banks in record time

Just for the record, you do understand that not only is this a lie, it's incredibly stupid, right?

Just checking.

[quote]Do you think people who don't have a dime to the name right now care about that? They want something passed NOW. They need money NOW. Nancy is living in an alternate universe and clearly cannot relate to the average American who has been hurt by the economy due to COVID.

And thanks to Nancy Pelosi, and Obama, those people who don't have a dime right now have access to free or low-cost health coverage...which the Republicans are working hard every day to eliminate. But you won't hear Wolf Blitzer ever mention that.

Wolf Blitzer is a staunch democrat. He just asked basic questions that I think many people want answers to. Pelosi came off looking bad. I will all politicians would just stop with the fake, poised smiling when discussing tough issues effecting the country. I don't think it's meant in malice, it's probably a tool to maintain composed and attentive, but it really has bad optics.

The original Aryans were Indian so they were not even white!

Right, r171, and "boat signs" are a great way to determine who will win the election.

What's interesting is that your "faux reasonable" post followed two other posts on this thread from you:

[quote]That's because she is is the epitome of a lying, corrupt, old school, out of touch, tone deaf politician out for her own gains and not truly fighting for the American people.

[quote]-"You are nothing but a rotten, crooked politician" Wasn't this a line in Mommy Dearest? Anyway, this applies to Nancy.

Yes, I hate Pelosi and that interview cemented it for me. I don't think Blitzer was being unreasonable in his line of questioning and is a staunch democrat. Maybe my view on Pelosi might have been softened if she didn't reaffirm what I already thought of her. Not everything is black and white. I'm always open to discussion.

For the record, R171, you were lying when you said that Blitzer is a "staunch Democrat."

But even if you were correct, that doesn't change the simple fact that Blitzer parroted the Republican framing of this issue and Pelosi was absolutely right to call him on it.

Most new sources thought it was fair questioning. DL is just hyper defensive of Pelosi and any scorns anyone who dare question her. His questioning was not out of line, but that's my opinion and who cares? You can think differently. We can still be friends.

[quote] tough issues effecting the country.

Oh, dear!

[quote]Most new sources thought it was fair questioning.

LOL... Tell me, does randomly making up shit work on the other forums you hang out in?

[quote]Yes, I hate Pelosi....

Duh.... Like we couldn't tell that.

[quote]I don't think Blitzer was being unreasonable in his line of questioning and is a staunch democrat.

You're still lying; I have no idea why you think that's the right thing to do here.

[quote]I'm always open to discussion.

No, you're really not, as you've proved on multiple threads.

"Blitzer did the right thing questioning Skeletor In A Wig, and she lost all composure and started to shout like the vile fishwife that she is."

R161 and other anti-Pelosi trolls like him/her/it on this thread don't give a flying fuck about hungry people. They're only interested in scoring political points against a very formidable, Democratic party opponent, one who can beat Republican assholes as their own game.

This is the first time I've seen anyone suggest he didn't destroy her in this interview. Guess you don't need aid but a lot of people do.

You don't get out much, do you, R181?

But I did love the incredibly lame, "Guess you don't need aid but a lot of people do," as though that has anything at all to do with what Pelosi is doing.

Funny how you cannot seem to condemn McConnell, who has already said the Senate won't vote on either Pelosi's bill or the White House proposal. Or Trump, who first blew up the negotiations only to change his mind a few days later. And I love how you completely ignore what is actually in the bill that House Democrats have passed that includes precisely the "aid" that "a lot of people need."

That bill has passed the House, which means that there is one and only one thing standing in the way of getting that aid to the American people: Mitch McConnell.

Congressional GOPers see the writing on the wall and have dedicated themselves to leaving President Biden with an utterly destroyed US economy. Leaving idiots like Wolf asking why Dems in the house haven't fixed everything yet.

They're playing the "but the DEFECIT!" card already.

ummm...votes this week.

Right, R185. We'll be sure to give your opinion exactly the attention it deserves:

[quote]She is the dumbass with that shit eating grin on her face. She knows no struggles. I'm tempted to not vote at all as all she is worried about is people getting a check with trump's name on it before election day.

[quote]Not Boris, trump hater and possible non-voter in a swing state. These politicians have no clue. Politicized per her own letter quoted and she would not listen to the facts. She knows nothing. Politics is all ego.

[quote]Fuck off and keep drinking the kool aid. They can all fuck off.

[quote]If something doesn't happen by the end of the week, I am not voting. I'm done.

[quote]And if the Dems win they can change the plan. Duh. She does not want people seeing trump "helping." Politicizing people's economic situation. Simple and selfish.

[quote]They lost a dem voter in NC.

[quote]Politicizing cunt.

[quote]I do not see her as a shrill, old lady. I see her as a politician using it for political gain and votes. Too keep a "trump" check from getting into voters hands. She had no specific answers either.

[quote]Fuck all of them.

[quote]I'm crying! They can pass something now and fix it when the dems win. Simple. She does not care about people. And I am not a rethug. Carry on when you think people cannot make informed decisions for themselves. Be a lemming.

[quote]Think what you like.

[quote]Dumbass, some Dems in Congress feel the same way.

[quote]ummm...votes this week.

Whatever. I can't have an opinion? They need to do something and not politicize it FOR THE PEOPLE!

Now where did I say that you could not have an opinion, R187? Is reading really so difficult for you?

But just as you are allowed to have some really silly, ignorant opinions that you cannot support, I'm allowed to have the opinion that you're both an ideologue and a fool. Ain't freedom wonderful?

And why don't you quote al my posts? See how I feel about politics? Write a book!

And you tow the party line. Lemming. You are the fool.

Because you're not worth it, R189. Sorry to disappoint you but you're a garden-variety sociopath and troll and you're just here for my (temporary) amusement. And since I've had sufficient amusement for one day and since you're a complete fool, I'll move on.

It's not like anyone else here needs me to point out just how incredibly silly you are.

Dude, stop taking the bait. He’s distracting from the conversation and you’re allowing him to derail the entire thread. Block and carry on. What the fuck point is there in engaging with a bot?

Not worth it but worth it to quote posts only from this thread. Mental. Take your meds.

R166, I am not lying, and saying that I am doing so only shows your lack of morality. They DID agree to lend $1 trillion a day loans to banks, on top of the $1 trillion in 14-day-loans that they were offering them. Read the article below, if you please.

As for Skeletor In A Wig, she says that "Trump just wants to send out a check with his name on it" in the video above (minute 07:00), and when the interviewer asks her what the problem is, she comes up with the excuse that more is needed... So, people should starve and not receive a cheque from the government, because more is needed? That cannot be negotiated later on?

Moreover, Democrats and Republicans alike supported the Cares Act, which is nothing more than an upward transfer of wealth - this woman, nor any other politician who voted for it, has any authority to yak about what they do for the American people.

So no, you haven't handed anything to me and calling me an idiot as you gloat over your imaginary victory, only showcases your own imbecility.

By the way, even Democrats themselves are attacking Pelosi on this, and demanding her to take the deal now and negotiate additional measures later.

And no, The Hill is not a Republican-leaning news source, so quit making excuses for this psychopath.

[quote] And you tow the party line.

Oh, dear!

[quote] I am not lying, and saying that I am doing so only shows your lack of morality.

Thank you for confirming that you were, in fact, lying, since the Federal Reserve is a separate entity that has nothing at all to do with Congress or with anything under discussion in this thread. And note the time limit there, "through the end of the month," and that it was in the form of loans, not a gift. In short, you were lying.

Although I'm quite happy to go with "uninformed and stupid" if that makes you feel any better.

[quote]As for Skeletor In A Wig, she says that "Trump just wants to send out a check with his name on it" in the video above (minute 07:00)

Since that is, in fact, true, I'm not sure what point you think you're making.

[quote]That cannot be negotiated later on?

See R159.

[quote]Moreover, Democrats and Republicans alike supported the Cares Act, which is nothing more than an upward transfer of wealth

LOL.... So you get caught lying and you respond by ... more lying.

[quote]So no, you haven't handed anything to me and calling me an idiot as you gloat over your imaginary victory, only showcases your own imbecility.

ROFL... No comment needed.

dude, get a new hobby.

last word ain't working. people are struggling. just do it.

[quote]And no, The Hill is not a Republican-leaning news source

Wrong.

Mitch is going to vote on his own proposal this week, proposing a fraction of what's needed. Is President Shitstain onboard with it?

[quote] By the way, even Democrats themselves are attacking Pelosi on this, and demanding her to take the deal now and negotiate additional measures later.

Then they are even bigger deplorables than the deplorables.

How he and that other always miserable seeming Asperger’s robot Erin Burnett keep their jobs based on whom or on what dirt they must know on that network, is beyond me. Can’t stand either of those annoying, boring, droning-on fcuks.

[quote]Or Trump, who first blew up the negotiations only to change his mind a few days later.

Remember the blackmail--”I won't negotiate until AFTER the election”

But Pelosi's the bad guy.

At least Chuck Schumer knows his place.

[quote]Is President Shitstain onboard with it?

Who knows? Trump changes his mind on a daily basis. His last instructions were to "go big." McConnell ignored it.

Where my money at, Nancy? You hiding it in your purse?

I suspect Nancy has a plan to kill off the Senate's shitty "please don't let us lose control of the Senate" financial bill.

Shade and strategy are her two strong points.

Pelosi Sets FAKE Deadline For New Excuse To Kill Stimulus Talks Before Election - the latest from The Hill.

LOL... oh, you poor thing. You do understand that the deadline wasn't "fake" and that was based on legislative realities, don't you?

Oh, you really don't, do you? That's just sad. Tell me, have you figured out the difference between Congress and the Federal Reserve yet? Or the difference between a gift and a loan?

As we can all see, R210, you're as starved for attention as always. Besides, didn't you say in one of your many frantic interventions that I am too stupid for you to deign to respond to my "ill-informed" judgements and "lies"?

You cannot avoid the unstoppable desire to be right at any cost, can you? Well, enjoy your little victory, then! 😂

Why, no, R211, you didn't see that. Tell me, does blatantly lying work on those forums you frequent?

[quote]You cannot avoid the unstoppable desire to be right at any cost, can you?

LOL.... So being wrong, as you so often are, is preferable?

And why should Nancy allow the Republicans to pass a stimulus bill before the election? Bitch McTurtle has made it clear that the Senate's ONLY priority is railroading that Covid-infected Fundie Judge through. So fuck them.

R182 I didn't hear any concrete plan, she should be saying how people will receive actual help.

R213 - Maybe because we are in the middle of a pandemic, there are still people laid off and out of/or cannot go back to work. This has been going on since March. Even people with savings are starting to run out of money. The election will be a huge distraction and something might not get passed for another 2 months. Those stimulus checks and extra $300/week would help a lot of people and Biden can always amend and revise for more funds if he should win.

[quote]“I don’t want to carry over the droppings of this grotesque elephant into the next presidency,” Ms. Pelosi told her members. “We’ve got to get something big, and we’ve got to get it done soon and we’ve got to get it done right.”

Why do so many right wing videos have that yellow font on the thumbnail? They are listed by different accounts but I’m starting to think it’s one person/organization churning them out.