Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police

Oh, how unfortunate. Rather like when the cameras in the tunnel where Princess Diana died happened not to be working that night.

Big Liz will stop at nothing to protect her grifter brood... and the cash flow that spurts from the teat of public funds.

Well, then we just have to assume he's innocent, don't we?

Molestation? How hard is it to say RAPE? That's exactly what he did...

Oh that’s it then, he’s fuck’n guiltily

People are going off at the media that is trying to throw Meghan under the bus right now. They are being watched like a hawk. Mass Twitter rants at the hypocracy and racism. It's so out in the open now. People are talking about mass protesting and boycotting media sites if Meghan is used as a shield for Andrew. Next week is going to be an epic shitstorm. I don't do sm and am just an observer but even this interests me.

Leave Andrew alone.

Oh for Crissake, extradite him already!!

Has Fergie commented yet?

The article says that the records are routinely destroyed after two years, so this is probably not the smoking gun that will take down Randy Andy.

R10 True, but his Royal uncut cock probably will.

I was just shredding all my receipts older than 7 years old with the new shredder I purchased. Keeping things simple, what is the standard retention limit for those sort of records? I'm not an Andrew supporter, but if the records were destroyed following established retention limits, I can't see that there's an issue, other than one of general frustration. I'd rather know what actually happened.

R6 is “just an observer” who’s here daily with its lunatic posts.

How come every epic shitstorm you predict doesn’t happen?

Do you understand the law of diminishing returns? The more you say the less people listen because you sound seriously disturbed - your pronouncements make less sense every time.

How come you’ll say anything to try to deflect from the Harkle’s “disaster-a-day” PR scheme.

I don't see why he'd expect security records to be released to random members of the public, regardless of how long they're kept.

We The People demand them. He is a public employee, and we deserve to know exactly who we’re paying.

There had to be an accessible record somewhere: how else could such a busy important man recall and assert that he was at the Woking Pizza Express with his family on the night in question?

An alibi is not the same as a receipt from Fortnum & Mason, R12.

Hold me Philip. I'm scared.

They know what's good for them

OP's article is a poor rehash of a Fail article. Neither make much sense.

Whatever the record was -- security footage, interviews with staff, what have you -- surely it could be reconstructed?

R11, all the Royals are cut. They even have a royal mohel.

Not William and Harry R22.

I don't even want to think about that.

R12, the Met police have said that they are obligated to keep records for only two years, but that does not answer the question of when these particular records were destroyed.

[quote] "Witness claims to have seen Prince Andrew at club with Virginia Giuffre. The FBI has been passed information from a witness claiming to have seen the Duke of York at a nightclub with a woman who alleges the pair had sex when she was a teenager. Andrew has denied Giuffre’s claim he was at the Mayfair club on the night of 10 March 2001, saying he was at home after visiting the Pizza Express restaurant in Woking with daughter Beatrice."

Can we please have an official statement from Beatrice? A statement from Pizza Express would also be helpful, before they finally go out of business altogether.

This is an interesting analysis of the BBC interview debacle by a criminal psychologist. It is quite damning,

They are covering it.

It's good to be king and better to be the son of a queen

The police are guilty of evidence tampering.

r30

Only if the queen allows it.

They're all crooks.

Quick! Release more stories about Meghan!

Andrew is only protected as long as the Queen is around. Charles will not go to these lengths to cover up whatever he’s done, especially if he’s only been sitting on the throne a short time when the next scandal happens.

The Queen is protecting Andrew because he’s her son. He’s Charles’ uncle. That’s not the same. And Charles has said for a long time that he wants to streamline the family. That’s probably a euphemism for “throw Andrew and his grifter ex-wife under the bus.”

R34, you mean he’s Charles’s brother. That, by itself, explains why Charles hates him. Charles was never anybody’s favorite.

[quote]Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police

Oh well, I guess this means he's innocent. Move it along.

The very idea of the Queen of England actually giving birth is funny to me for some reason.

If you think THAT’S funny ....

OP, Virginia Giuffre was 26 in March 2011. It's in fact her 37th birthday today! Do you mean 2001?

In any case, I thought it was common knowledge that the sex happened at Ghislaine's place in London - the one in which the infamous photo that shows Andrew and Giuffre smiling and with their arms around each other was taken, so he could easily have believed that she actually wanted to have sex with him (even if she didn't). She was also over the age of consent.

Extradite him on what charge, r8?

Everyone in this story is unlikable and sleazy. And I'm sick of hearing from Giuffre , the more I hear from her the less sympathy I have.

The satirical puppet show 'Spitting Image' is returning to TV soon. One of the main caricatures in publicity images was Andrew.

In its heyday the show had Andrew as a smiling stupid randy boor. The new puppet shows a lined harried greying man deep in troubled midlife.

It'll be fascinating to see how close to the mark the scripts go. Allusions will no doubt speak volumes. But unwanted attention for Andrew will remain steady.

So some rich old men pay some teenage hookers? We don't get what all the uproar is about. There is obviously something else going on here.......

The world of heterosexual is a sick and boring life!

A statement from Pizza Express in Woking:

[bold]Pizza Express wishes to make clear that while we certainly appreciate the patronage of HRH Prince Andrew over the years, we cannot endorse any specific client statements pertaining to visits to our establishments. However, one of our servers does recall a brief visit by HRH Prince Andrew on the evening of March 13, 1995 in the company of Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice as well as 4 bodyguards. We were delighted to have served our house dish "Under 16 and Never Been Kissed" which the Prince personally requested. The Under 16 Pizza has been a huge favourite of HRH's which he usually has with our fiery house cocktail "Conduct Unbecoming". We also recall that the royal party ordered our very popular house dessert "Geh Lane Special" which features a plate of fresh tarts, covered in frothy white meringue oozing warm buttercream". Of course, no pizza supper would be complete without a final very special dessert to cap off the evening's festivities. HRH ordered a takeaway dessert called "Burst with Ecstasy" - I can tell you that owing to the special ingredients, we only make about 10 of these desserts a year. HRH's Burst with Ecstasy was a private affair and for this reason, cannot comment.

We hope this clears up any confusion relating to HRH's visit to Pizza Express in Woking.

Bravo 👏🏼 [reply 44]

Candid photos of Andrew from decades ago revealed, sadly, severe tinymeat.

Probably why he has to pay for stinkfish!

R44, Andrew has never been accused of kissing or having sex with under 16s, only a 17 year old, which is above the age of consent in the UK and most of the US.

All 'victims' were full grown sexually mature and sexually active stinkfish: ov-ulating, gizz-ulating, and stink-ulating!

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]