[quote]My card is not marked with SNAP.
Why would your stimulus payment be marked with SNAP? You misread my comment. Nevertheless, you prove my point when you state
[quote]where you pull up the card, it says it's an Economic Impact Payment Card that "you are receiving as a result of the Coronavirus Aid." That's after you lift up the card that you see that.
So, the purpose of the card was hidden? How many people, like me, who have received real- and official-looking "cards" in the mail from every organization from the WWF to AARP (yes, I'm old), throw them away without removing the card from the paper attachment?
I'm usually not one for conspiracy theories, but forgive me if I'm acutely aware of Republican hijinks designed to separate poor people from what little money they have. This just pisses me off, and what makes it all that much worse is that the entire stimulus bill was implemented by the Trump administration in ways to hurt poor people in any way they could. For example, the first people who received the stimulus payments were people who had their checking account linked to their tax returns, a practice that is predominantly performed by professional accountants and tax consultants. Who pays for professionals to do their taxes? Oh, that's right, the wealthy, and sometimes, middle class. But poor people? Not so much. Then there is the fact that you have to own a checking account in the first place, in order to have one on file with the IRS.
Then they mailed out tens of millions of paper checks. Which you must either have a checking account to cash, or pay one of those horrible payday loan/check cashing places an exorbitant fee to cash a check that is backed by the full faith and credit of the American people (as in, it's not a check that is going to bounce). Zero risk should result in a very, very low fee to cash a check, if at all.
If the payment was lost or delayed, did Treasury charge someone who received an electronic deposit a fee to research the payment? Does Treasury charge people who lost a paper check a fee to replace it? No and no. But they do charge people who lose or discard an unmarked debit card a fee to replace that.
[quote]so why would they try to screw a mere 4 million people out of their payments through nefarious means?
Because Republicans get hard when they shaft poor people (with apologies for the sexual analogy, but it's the most apt). It is that simple, and to suggest otherwise simply indicates you're not paying attention. These EBT-style cards are just another nail in that coffin.