Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

DOJ warns Los Angeles, Illinois of possible illegality of stay-at-home orders

WASHINGTON – The Justice Department warned state and local officials Friday of the possible illegality of their stay-at-home orders, as the agency continues to monitor restrictions meant to contain the spread of COVID-19.

In a letter to Los Angeles officials, Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband said their recent comments suggesting that stay-at-home orders may stay in place longer "may be both arbitrary and unlawful." The Justice Department also said that Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker's "sweeping limitations" on Illinois residents raise constitutional concerns.

Attorney General William Barr said last month that the Justice Department would intervene if stay-at-home orders in response to the coronavirus pandemic become too restrictive, directing federal prosecutors "to be on the lookout" for state and local directives that could be violating constitutional rights. In a memo, Barr acknowledged that while lockdowns are "necessary" to stop the spread of the virus, such restrictions have placed "tremendous burdens" on Americans.

"If a state or local ordinance crosses the line from an appropriate exercise of authority to stop the spread of COVID-19 into an overbearing infringement of constitutional and statutory protections, the Department of Justice may have an obligation to address that overreach in federal court," Barr said.

The Justice Department's comments Friday regarding Los Angeles and Illinois stop short of declaring legal actions against the localities. But the agency warns of potential civil liberties violations.

"The Department of Justice does not seek to dictate how cities and counties such as Los Angeles determine what degree of activity and personal interaction should be allowed to protect the safety of their citizens," Dreiband said in the letter to Los Angeles officials. "However, we are charged with protecting the federal statutory and constitutional rights of all persons in our country, and ensuring that governmental restrictions are not unconstitutionally burdensome. ... Simply put, there is no pandemic exception to the U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights."

The letter was addressed to Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and Department of Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer and cited comments the two made about the possibility of long-term lockdowns. Ferrer said at a county supervisors' meeting earlier this month that some form of stay-at-home orders will likely stay in place "for the next three months." Garcetti also said in a media interview that Los Angeles would "never be completely open until we have a cure" for the virus.

"However, we remain concerned about what may be an arbitrary and heavy-handed approach to continuing stay-at-home requirements," Dreiband said in the letter. Garcetti's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Also on Friday, the Justice Department filed court papers in an unrelated lawsuit against Pritzker, Illinois' Democratic governor. The department argued Pritzker exceeded his authority when he ordered citizens to stay at home except for essential reasons.

Pritzker, who extended stay-at-home orders until end of May, had been sued by Republican Illinois state Rep. Darren Bailey. Bailey alleged the restrictions are unlawful because they extended beyond the 30-day emergency powers the state legislature granted Pritzker.

In its court filing supporting Bailey, the Justice Department said the lawmaker raised substantial questions on the lawfulness of Pritzker's stay-at-home order.

"Even during times of crisis, executive actions undertaken in the name of public safety must be lawful," said Steven Weinhoeft, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois. "And while the people of Illinois must be physically protected from the effects of this public health crisis ... their constitutionally guaranteed rights and liberties must be safeguarded as well."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4Last Friday at 11:30 PM

Is the Dem Establishment is trying to run the Obama/Trump economy into the ground?!

by Anonymousreply 1Last Friday at 10:49 PM

I'm glad the DOJ is putting this in writing.

We can use it against trump in November, if he tries to make people stay at home during election time.

by Anonymousreply 2Last Friday at 10:53 PM

'Possible' - we don't know either.

by Anonymousreply 3Last Friday at 11:12 PM

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but Trump and the DoJ don't have any say-so in a state matter like this, just like with his meaningless order to open all the churches.

by Anonymousreply 4Last Friday at 11:30 PM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Don't you just LOVE clicking on these things on every single site you visit? I know we do! You can thank the EU parliament for making everyone in the world click on these pointless things while changing absolutely nothing. If you are interested you can take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT and we'll set a dreaded cookie to make it go away. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!