A Question For Any Knowledgeable Virus Follower
The Mayor of LA Eric Garcetti made this statement yesterday,
[quote]The mayor said L.A. is six to 12 days behind New York in being hit with a wave of positive cases. "The peak is not here yet," he said. "It will be bad."
I'm not understanding what New York has to do with the timing of events here in Los Angeles. San Francisco is already a virus "hot spot". We have plenty of people traveling from all over the world here just like New York, many from the East.
I'm trying to make sense out of his statement, is there some kind of chart or something I missed that points to what he is saying?
by Anonymous | reply 49 | March 30, 2020 1:35 PM
|
The developing cases seem to follow a similar kind of curve everywhere. That said since barely anyone is tested the only numbers that really say something are the ones of the casualties IF they are reported correctly to have been caused by the coronavirus.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | March 25, 2020 4:17 PM
|
Where the hell have you been? Time to put the Fleshlight down for two minutes and pay attention.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | March 25, 2020 4:20 PM
|
Appears most serious cases involve the elderly and/or people with underlying health issues.
If you're young and healthy and you get it bad, I would get a full physical after you're well to determine if you have some undiagnosed health problem (diabetes? HIV? cancer?).
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 3 | March 25, 2020 4:22 PM
|
I know they have been tracking some kind of curve but San Francisco would seem to have more to do with LA's projection than New York which is on the other side of the country no?
by Anonymous | reply 4 | March 25, 2020 4:23 PM
|
I don't think LA will get anywhere near as bad as NYC. LA is spread-out, unlike NYC where people live on top of one another and use the subway to get around. Plus, LA went into lockdown, which NYC failed to do.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | March 25, 2020 4:27 PM
|
NYC has been in lockdown for over a week now. It doesn't mean what you think it means, r5.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | March 25, 2020 4:30 PM
|
Government officials are as in the dark about the progress of Wuflu as medical professionals. Everyone is guessing and speculating.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | March 25, 2020 4:35 PM
|
There is a map in this NYT article that shows where the cases are clustered in this country. There is a dense cluster in the North Eastern part of the country. Then you look at places like Arizona and New Mexico and the cases are spread out.
Other than sporting events, conventions and concerts there are no other places where large numbers of Angelenos come in contact with each other. If this virus can't be spread by incidental contact then maybe the numbers won't be as bad out here in CA. A this point though, there is no report on how it is spread.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 8 | March 25, 2020 4:44 PM
|
[quote]I know they have been tracking some kind of curve but San Francisco would seem to have more to do with LA's projection than New York which is on the other side of the country no?
FFS - it doesn't have anything to do with proximity or people traveling and spreading the virus.
This is why we're all going to die in a massive extinction-level epidemic.
Extremely simplified:
* the spread of the virus and infection rates appear to follow a geometric pattern (the rate of change of a number of infected people over time time is proportional to the number of infected people - the more people who are infected the faster the infection rates will become). You will hear people speak of "exponential" or "geometric" growth rates - while they are mathematically different, over the relevant range, they essentially express the same type of growth pattern.
* since this pattern appears to be consistent (so far), LA can look at the infection rates over a period of days and weeks that another city like NY had and forecast the likely rise in infections and infection rates that LA will experience over a similar period of time.
* based on the current infection rates, Garcetti is saying that in terms of the pattern (infection rates), LA is now where NY was 6-12 days ago, assuming it follows the same trajectory.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | March 25, 2020 4:46 PM
|
Thank you r9.
You started out kind of bitchy though.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | March 25, 2020 4:53 PM
|
[quote]FFS - it doesn't have anything to do with proximity or people traveling and spreading the virus
That's not what Cuomo said in his daily briefing today. In fact, he said the exact opposite.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | March 25, 2020 4:59 PM
|
[quote]That's not what Cuomo said in his daily briefing today. In fact, he said the exact opposite.
Perhaps it would be better if we all died and the planet started again since we clearly have so few sentient life forms in any case.
No one can possibly be this stupid, and yet...
Read OP's post and my answer. Garcetti's statement is not a reference to spreading the virus, but when LA will peak. Yes, spreading the virus will have an impact on the rate at which infections occur. But, the notion of using the observed growth curve for infections in NY as a baseline to compare when LA will hit a (local) peak is a different matter.
Did people simply sleep during high school biology and intro to calculus when the derivative (rate of change) was taught?
by Anonymous | reply 12 | March 25, 2020 5:04 PM
|
^^Well, i did.
Rate of what? Derivatives?
by Anonymous | reply 13 | March 25, 2020 5:08 PM
|
Oh, and one more thing.
What Cuomo et al. are trying to do is FLATTEN the curve and slow the infection rate since, as noted, the more people who are infected, the fast the rate of infections will be (and therefore, more people will be become infected).
Sheltering in place, self-imposed quarantines, and eliminating travel between locations will reduce exposure and lower the rate at which new infections occur. If that rate can be sufficiently flattened, we will essentially have the situation under control - until the next wave of rising infections that ALL experts predict will occur will necessitate a second round of social distancing.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | March 25, 2020 5:09 PM
|
[quote]^^Well, i did.
Well, then you have insufficient knowledge to grasp the basic principles.
So...virus - bad. Makes people sick. No get close to other people who might be sick - make you sick, too. Some people who get sick go to heaven.
Simple enough for you?
by Anonymous | reply 15 | March 25, 2020 5:12 PM
|
R9 / r14 / r14, you're doing the written version of flailing about.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | March 25, 2020 5:13 PM
|
No r12 I was stoned as fuck during Biology.
Biology was right after lunch during which I'd got out and burn one.
My brain was fried, I remember nothing.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | March 25, 2020 5:15 PM
|
Per one of the abandoned cruise ships, the active virus can survive on hard surfaces for a minimum of 17 days. Yes, you can and people have caught it from touching things it is sitting on. LA being spread out is only as helpful as the hygiene of the people and businesses they enter.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | March 25, 2020 5:16 PM
|
Pople in LA can;t even stand to drive together, so there are different problems than in NY, which is the most conducive city to communicating the virus.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | March 25, 2020 5:17 PM
|
[quote][R9] / [R14] / [R14], you're doing the written version of flailing about.
We mock what we don't understand.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | March 25, 2020 5:17 PM
|
R15, I was kidding but your response was even more hilarious. Thank you, I needed a laugh. I really did.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | March 25, 2020 5:21 PM
|
This peak projection data is for novel coronavirus COVID-19. Chinese researchers are saying there is a COVID-2020, also known as a different or second strain.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | March 25, 2020 5:27 PM
|
No, r20. I understand, which is why I'm mocking you.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | March 25, 2020 5:34 PM
|
[quote]the active virus can survive on hard surfaces
Then it doesn't stand a chance on my dick.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | March 25, 2020 5:45 PM
|
Has anyone said anything about how it lasts on other surfaces like cloth?
by Anonymous | reply 25 | March 25, 2020 5:47 PM
|
Summary: You're going to die in a week
by Anonymous | reply 26 | March 25, 2020 5:48 PM
|
R12 in all her visages does a rather convincing job of looking like an unhelpful, unwanted pisspot who is just toooooooo for anyone else.
And with cunts, it doesn't matter where the gash is locating or if it is still bleeding. It's still a cunt.
And not an effective communicator, either.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | March 25, 2020 5:58 PM
|
R11 although it makes sense I believe Cuomo stressed that it was a personal opinion.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | March 25, 2020 6:20 PM
|
r28 - you type poor...and unedumacated.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | March 25, 2020 8:10 PM
|
Girls! Girls! You're all insufferable.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | March 25, 2020 8:53 PM
|
Jesus OP, why not go to an official coronavirus website and EDUCATE YOURSELF.
or is it too tough for you
by Anonymous | reply 32 | March 25, 2020 9:24 PM
|
The poster on this thread had some good info, but ruined it by being an overall cunt.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | March 25, 2020 9:43 PM
|
No he didn't, r33. he was wrong about a lot. As r32 said, go to an official website and educate yourself vs. someone on DL who speaks authoritatively.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | March 25, 2020 9:54 PM
|
What is the difference between "coronavirus" and "covid-19"?
by Anonymous | reply 35 | March 25, 2020 10:23 PM
|
Unconfirmed, r35, but I read somewhere:
COVID-19
[bold]Co[/bold]rona [bold]Vi[/bold]rus [bold]D[/bold]isease 2019
by Anonymous | reply 36 | March 25, 2020 10:32 PM
|
[quote]he was wrong about a lot.
Really? Like what specifically?
by Anonymous | reply 37 | March 25, 2020 10:44 PM
|
R22, is there a short story version? I have a low attention span.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | March 25, 2020 10:44 PM
|
Lots of Chinese people in LA and SF. It will be bad there
by Anonymous | reply 39 | March 25, 2020 10:52 PM
|
"So...virus - bad. Make people sick. No get close to other people who might be sick - make you sick, too. Some people who get sick go to heaven."
Patient Zero?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 40 | March 25, 2020 10:55 PM
|
I think many Angelenos took it seriously and self-quarantined but the social distancing wasn't taken seriously by some as the better weather had people going out to the parks, beaches, etc.. It sets back everything.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | March 25, 2020 11:00 PM
|
"What is the difference between "coronavirus" and "covid-19"?
R35. There are many different coronaviruses. Some are responsible for the "common cold". Covid 19 is the specific coronavirus responsible for the current pandemic.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | March 25, 2020 11:02 PM
|
I walked through the Grove today and it was practically empty; a security guard or two; three cops getting take out (I think the restaurant gave it to them gratis) - it was surreal.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | March 25, 2020 11:08 PM
|
And R42, the China virus?
by Anonymous | reply 44 | March 25, 2020 11:16 PM
|
I call it the Trump virus to go along with the Trump Recession.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | March 26, 2020 3:11 AM
|
He’s an interactive map with peak medical resource usage dates.
In Massachusetts, it looks like April 12th is peak resource use, and by about May 1, we’ll be through the worst of it. Virginia doesn’t peak until about May 1st.
How is your state going to do?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 46 | March 30, 2020 6:05 AM
|
this is biological warfare and agents infiltrated NYC and purposely spread the disease there, which explains the large number of cases.
The rest are just natural cases. The idea to use this for biological warfare came after a few cases were detected naturally.
This is why you have all these "foreign," missing "children" (late teens) as of late. They are sleeper cells gone into action
by Anonymous | reply 47 | March 30, 2020 7:48 AM
|
Lots of Chinese people in LA and SF. It will be bad there
The virus map of NYC has shown comparatively little spread in the Chinese populated areas, because they are used to wearing masks and have taken the stay at home directive very seriously.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | March 30, 2020 1:35 PM
|