Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.
Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.
Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.
Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.
[quote]A new analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) took a look at the different plans and found that while each proposal would reduce the number of uninsured Americans, the least costly would be Buttigieg’s plan.
Net fiscal impact:
Biden -$800 billion
Buttigieg +$450 billion
Sanders -$13.4 trillion
Warren -$6.1 trillion
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | January 24, 2020 1:00 PM |
Waiting for the “that’s disqualifying” cancel trolls to arrive.
| by Anonymous | reply 1 | January 24, 2020 12:55 PM |
Impressive
| by Anonymous | reply 2 | January 24, 2020 12:57 PM |
I will close my eyes and vote for Sanders if he is the nominee. But his plans are sheer idiocy. There is more to effective and efficient policy than "taxing the rich". Just taxing the rich won't even cover 40% of his 60 Trillion dollar plans. This is why I support Biden or Buttigieg over him--they have actual plans and policies that actually have a chance of passing in congress and they won't punish the middle class (despite what Bernie supporters say).
| by Anonymous | reply 3 | January 24, 2020 1:00 PM |
Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.
Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!
