R128 During my summer in England two decades ago, countless Brits told me that the US is a puritanical country [as opposed to the UK]. It makes sense that that would be your national view since many Puritans fled Britain for North America, and it is part of our founding. (The other major part of our founding, entirely separate from the Puritans, was the commerce of the tobacco, and later cotton, trades in the south that had no relation to Puritanism.) But the statement was made so often by so many different people that it seems clear that that is a British stereotype that has taken on a life of its own—even though it is true in many ways.
Regarding Brits’ reputation for being ‘reserved,’ my experience was that they are not reserved at all—which perhaps is why I was SO put off by the drunken rowdiness and pissing in the streets every night. I saw this a few years ago in Amsterdam, as well. I sat at an outdoor cafe and occasionally a boat full of screaming, rowdy and clearly drunk guys would come along and inevitably, in every case, it was British guys who were behaving like frat boys do in the US. And then in the airport on the way back, a small group of British people were disturbing the whole security area with their rowdiness. So ‘reserved’ certainly doesn’t fit.
But it seems to me that British people promote the stereotype of being mannered and overly polite. Netflix has a British show about true British stereotypes, linked here, and among the things British people make fun of themselves for is politeness. They themselves frequently joke about how supposedly passive and deferential and self-blaming they are. I’ve seen this in YouTube video commentaries, as well, and hosts of Guardian podcasts regularly joke about how overly mannered and apologetic Brits are, as well as how much they talk about the weather. These seem to be exported stereotypes to a degree. I think the difference is that British people may be culturally apologetic and culturally deferential in a way—probably in part due to the accepted class system that puts some people socially beneath others, which we have but refuse to acknowledge, and so lower-class people are perhaps bolder here—and we may equate that with reserved, but Brits especially when drunk are not reserved.
We in the US are Puritanical about sex compared with many Europeans to be sure. That seems to be changing since the most conservative Americans now embrace a cheating, porn star fucking president who is married to a nude model/mail-order bride. And we do probably assign greater stigma to drug and alcohol use.
But we’re less Puritanical in some ways, too: Puritans believed, for example, that your lot in life is assigned by God and if you are successful, that is part of the natural order and it demonstrates inherent goodness, and if you’re poor, then that means you’re not favored. That idea is contrary to the ‘American dream’ of working your way up, and it’s more compatible with British hierarchy. We’re also a violent culture, and part of the cultural violence is predicated on inherent distrust of our own governors, and that’s also the opposite of a Puritanical view, whereas the British hold onto the notion of royals as demigods with special blood as decreed by God, even if their power has been stripped and handed to the people.
I think the US and the UK both hold onto aspects of Puritan ideals, just different ones. You retain hierarchy and orderliness and an assigned lot in life, which is very Puritanlike, and we reject that; however, we retain prohibition of sensual pleasures, or at least we condemn those who engage in them. We seem to have greater religious extremes, more extreme violent crimes, and more extreme chemical drug use, and we lock away people for some of these things, which could theoretically include whipping out a dick while drunk and pissing in the street in front of people, and over there, that’s just a typical Tuesday night activity.