Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

California to Stop Buying From Automakers That Backed Trump on Emissions

WASHINGTON — California’s government has hit back at automakers that sided with President Trump over the state on fuel efficiency standards, saying Sacramento will halt all purchases of new vehicles from General Motors, Toyota, Fiat Chrysler and other automakers that backed stripping California of its authority to regulate tailpipe emissions.

The ban, which the California governor, Gavin Newsom, plans to implement in January 2020, is the latest shot in the intensifying battle over climate change between Mr. Trump and the state, which he appears to relish antagonizing.

“Carmakers that have chosen to be on the wrong side of history will be on the losing end of California’s buying power,” Governor Newsom said in a statement on Monday.

A spokeswoman for G.M. said the state was depriving itself of the low-cost electric vehicles it needed to meet its environmental objectives.

“Removing vehicles like the Chevy Bolt and prohibiting G.M. and other manufacturers from consideration will reduce California’s choices for affordable, American-made electric vehicles and limit its ability to reach its goal of minimizing the state government’s carbon footprint, a goal that G.M. shares,” the spokeswoman, Jeannine Ginivan, said.

Representatives from the White House, Fiat Chrysler and Toyota did not respond to requests for comment.

The fight over planet-warming auto emissions has split the nation’s auto industry: Four major companies have sided with California on its legal authority to set tough state-level standards on tailpipe pollution, while at least five others have sided with Mr. Trump, who is rolling back Obama-era fuel economy standards and moving to strip California of its authority to set its own.

In a statement published late Friday, the California Department of General Services said that, effective immediately, all sedans purchased by the state would have to be electric or hybrid vehicles.

Beneath that announcement was a little-noticed policy that, starting in 2020, state agencies will only purchase vehicles from manufacturers that recognize the authority of California’s clean air agency to set its own greenhouse gas emission standards.

Editors’ Picks

Can FaZe Clan Build a Billion-Dollar Business?

The Most Watched Show at the Office? Sexual Harassment Training Videos

He’s Never Going to Put Away That Shirt Although the statement does not mention G.M., Toyota or Fiat Chrysler by name, the new policy amounts to ban on state purchases of vehicles made by those companies and a handful of others, represented by the lobbying group Global Automakers, a spokesman for Mr. Newsom confirmed on Monday.

Going forward, California’s state agencies will chiefly purchase cars from Ford, Honda, Volkswagen and BMW. In July, those companies sided with California when they struck a deal to follow California’s more stringent standards, which are close to the original Obama-era rules.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11November 20, 2019 1:35 AM

Great, take away more choice and drive up costs on consumers while importing more refugees that is making climate change worse. California is remarkably efficient at taking away freedoms but totally ineffective when it comes to solutions.

by Anonymousreply 1November 19, 2019 4:48 PM

[quote] take away more choice and drive up costs on consumers

California "chooses" not to continue polluting the environment

by Anonymousreply 2November 19, 2019 4:51 PM

So this ban only effects what the State of CA purchases for their own vehicles, correct? I don't see an issue here. Gavin Newsom is right.

by Anonymousreply 3November 19, 2019 4:52 PM

[quote] California is remarkably efficient at taking away freedoms but totally ineffective when it comes to solutions.

California came up with a GREAT climate change solution by demanding car companies work towards higher mileage per gallon. Nearly all the companies sign on until...Trump started trying to erase all that program by saying car companies should not follow California's rules.

by Anonymousreply 4November 19, 2019 4:53 PM

Correct, R3. R1 is mistaken. This is good news.

by Anonymousreply 5November 19, 2019 5:34 PM

Lately California's government has seemed hopelessly inept on a number of levels, but credit where it's due: Newsom is taking real action on the environment and punishing corporations that won't do the bare minimum to save all our asses. Good on him.

by Anonymousreply 6November 19, 2019 5:38 PM

Actually R1 the decision to use more efficient vehicles in the state will reduce all manner of costs related to pollution and health and certainly will not drive up prices or vehicles that can be sold in CA. Why do you think that? Because vehicles that do not accept standards will be cheaper? Are you kidding- you think less fuel efficient automobiles and those that eschew technology are going to be cheaper? Which would you rater have, a vehicle that gets 60 mil per gallon fossil fuel or one that get 20? You sound kind of stupid!

by Anonymousreply 7November 19, 2019 5:39 PM

R7 I'm not making any assumptions, just reading from the article.

[quote] “Removing vehicles like the Chevy Bolt and prohibiting G.M. and other manufacturers from consideration will reduce California’s choices for affordable, American-made electric vehicles and limit its ability to reach its goal of minimizing the state government’s carbon footprint, a goal that G.M. shares,”

When I buy a car, fuel economy is just one of the things I take into consideration along with cost, quality, and performance.

[quote] Which would you rater have, a vehicle that gets 60 mil per gallon fossil fuel or one that get 20?

I drive a car that gets somewhere in between with that is described as having a "respectable fuel economy" but "below average for its class". Who should be responsible for regulating something that is so inherently vague? If given the choice to upgrade to a vehicle with better performance and better fuel economy, then yes, I would upgrade if possible, but given my financial situation, it wouldn't be my first priority right now.

Lastly, what about unintended consequences to overregulation? What about workplace or used vehicles?

by Anonymousreply 8November 19, 2019 6:01 PM

R8, this only applies to vehicles purchased for STATE use by the government of California. You're still free to buy whatever you want. Did you miss that point?

by Anonymousreply 9November 19, 2019 7:13 PM

It's amazing that Trump is trying hard to prevent California from instituting standards for its own state.

So, state's rights is suddenly meaningless for the GOP?

by Anonymousreply 10November 19, 2019 8:19 PM

R10

States' rights only matter to the right when it's convenient for them, like when they're opposing marriage equality or racial justice. The same can be said for the left. The left likes states' rights for corporate regulation and weed legalization, but not much else.

by Anonymousreply 11November 20, 2019 1:35 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!