Michael Jackson's Accusers Might get New Trial.

Hologram defendant?

I give them milk and cookies and we sleep in the same bed. It's charming!

[quote]Hologram defendant?

I'd watch that trial.

James and Wade with Anthony Edwards.

Wade is looking especially good.

Linky

Wade Robson mooching off MJ even in death.

Lock his remains up!

Good, the Jackson estate and his disgusting relatives that defend him KNOWING he was a pedophile deserve to lose their wealth. They actually deserve to go to prison. All the useless Jackson kin may have to actually work. Horrors! Good luck to James and Wade.

Good. And for anyone who starts screeching "gold diggers" I say, so what? Just because somebody wants to be compensated doesn't mean Jacko didn't abuse them.

And for anyone who thinks #metoo is just for women, this will be the big case that helps abused men speak up more.

I'm fairly convinced MJ sexually abused several children...just not either these two.

What if James and Wade are awarded 100% of the MJ estate as restitution for MJ’s crimes? Would that make MJ music more popular or less popular?

This whole thing will be dead in the water. They've already been proven liers in that documentary they did.

Even Oprah distanced herself from these two. They wont be getting a dime of the Jackson estate. They for decades said MJ did nothing wrong, and suddenly when one of them start having financial problems their a molestation victim?

I just don't know, there's so much that doesn't add up with these to and it keeps getting pointed out. Even the FBI investigated MJ for a decade without him knowing it, and it was closed because they found nothing. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THE FUCKING FBI FOUND NOTHING. THAT SHOULD TELL YOU SOMETHING RIGHT THERE.

The world is a safer place without MJ.

[quote] Even Oprah distanced herself from these two.

Prove it.

R14 Google it.

Our society has a long, long way to go before it will treat sex abuse victims with the dignity and respect that they deserve.

Michael would be mortified to take his clothes off in front of anyone. Do you even understand him? He didn't even cuss.

[quote]Michael would be mortified to take his clothes off in front of anyone. Do you even understand him? He didn't even cuss.

So? He kept his clothes on.

Michael Jackson stans are certifiably insane. Imagine having blind adoration for a child abusing freak. Get a life - you’re sicker than him.

"I'm fairly convinced MJ sexually abused several children...just not either these two."

[quote]Michael would be mortified to take his clothes off in front of anyone. Do you even understand him? He didn't even cuss.

his first accuser was able do describe distinctive marks on his penis.

"Michael Jackson stans are certifiably insane. Imagine having blind adoration for a child abusing freak"

Much like Trump stans.

He didn’t “cuss”. He fucked little boys instead.

Those kids got what they were after..

[quote] Even Oprah distanced herself from these two.... Prove it.

[quote] Google it. - R12

NO you Google it. Don't lay a claim like that and not provide a link. You might as have well added..."some people are saying".

R25 If your to fucking stupid to Google the fact that oprah, put distance between herself and these two $ hungry no credibility having white supremacists.

Then that's your problem. Do your own fucking research, it's not my responsibility to do so for you.

Lazy ass.

It's entirely possible to think Jackson is a child molester and also think that Robson is a con artist looking to make a few bucks off the backs of MJ's real victims. There's nothing wonderful about that. It's disgusting and shameful all around.

And to those saying so what? After he defended Jackson for years, during the two trials when he could have been brought to justice? You think he deserves monetary rewards over those victims? Sick.

He lied for decades, and now hes a victim? That's what I have a problem with.

So much isn't adding up.

R27, save the hate for Michael and his defenders

R10, Michael pulled Safechuck out of school to go on tour with him and be with him 24/7....you think he did that for purely platonic purposes?

Michael fans are delusional

[quote]save the hate for Michael and his defenders

You mean like Robson was for twenty years?

Save your pity for his real victims.

Rick and kathy Hilton were really close friends of Michael Jackson, and they don't believe this stuff either.

Dear friends.

R31, he is a real victim

r29, I stand by my previous statement.

I believe it's probable that Michael Jackson molested children. I simply do not find either of these two credible.

I do not believe that he molested EVERY child that interacted with him. Based on all the stories about the Sanduskys and pedo priests that have come to light, he more likely surrounded himself with many children and only molested some of them, as would be typical of molesters.

Most grown straight men don’t even want to spend hours on end with their own children. Michael Jackson shared his bed with them. As long as they were prepubescent, male and very good looking. I hope Safechuck and Robson bankrupt the motherfucking Jackson’s. Straight up pedo enablers.

"I do not believe that he molested EVERY child that interacted with him. Based on all the stories about the Sanduskys and pedo priests that have come to light, he more likely surrounded himself with many children and only molested some of them, as would be typical of molesters."

Why would he pull Safechuck out of school to go on tour with him, share hotel rooms with him on the tour, spend 24 hours a day with him.....you think he did all that for no reason? You are weird.

[quote]Why would he pull Safechuck out of school to go on tour with him, share hotel rooms with him on the tour, spend 24 hours a day with him.....you think he did all that for no reason? You are weird.

And you are repeating yourself.

I've already said I believe Jackson is a molester. We'll probably never know how many actual victims of his abuse are out there.

I just don't find either of these two accusers credible. Why are you so invested in this particular person being a victim? Both of their stories are so filled with inconsistencies, inaccuracies, and flip flops that their credibility is strained. You are weirder that you are so invested in this guy.

r38, why are you so invested in claiming he's not credible? What about him do you find unbelievable? It's weird that you think Michael was a molester, but didn't molest two of the boys he spent the most time with.

And as for "flip flops" - Jerry Sandusky's son told a grand jury that his father never molested him.....then later said he was a victim. And yet no one disbelieved him. Victims change their stories, sometimes they maintain they weren't molested when they really were, often because they don't want to deal with the truth.

[quote] He lied for decades, and now hes a victim? That's what I have a problem with.

Couldn’t agree more, r28. “Dating” Brooke Shirlds while carrying Emmanuel Lewis around should have been a warning siren, but so many missed it. Michael Jackson was that sort of liar.

[quote][R38], why are you so invested in claiming he's not credible? What about him do you find unbelievable? It's weird that you think Michael was a molester, but didn't molest two of the boys he spent the most time with.

I'm not invested at all - I'm responding to you and your manic insistence.

And to prove that I'm not invested, I'll stop responding to you.

Because they are so successful in their careers now, I'm sure the fellas will donate any lawsuit 'winnings' to the prevention of child abuse.

As opposed to your manic attacks on child molestation victims

[quote]He lied for decades, and now hes a victim? That's what I have a problem with. So much isn't adding up.

Were you fucked by an adult at eight years old and threatened not to talk and then grew up to be a completely normal psychologically?

Who would side with a perv like Michael?

Best of luck guys.

I believe Latoya, even if she later recanted (she was probably forced to, I would say). The evidence is there yet his fans refuse to listen. If we were talking about any other man, a neighbour perhaps, who has an obsession with young boys. This man would have special 'friends', with whom he would hang out with and let sleep at his house; he would take them on tours, share hotel rooms and so forth, and then dump them once they hit puberty and replace with a new friend. What would they say about that person?? Would they let their kids stay at his house?