Why hasn't brave, woke Meghan Markle denounced her rapist in-law Prince Andrew?

DEATH! DEATH TO MEGHAN MARKLE!! SHE IS TOO BLAME FOR EVERYTHING!!!!! BURN HER!!!!!!!

Why should she? It would only give you more reason to bash her, OP.

You know damn well you would be ripping her apart if she did that.

You anti-royalty people are just a bunch of rabble-rousing Communists. Who did Prince Andrew rape? Probably no one.

R3 last time I checked, some 17 year old his mate Epstein loaned him.

I doubt that. Look, you all have to stop being so jealous of royalty. People in the upper echelons of society are very different from the hoi polloi. They’re for you to admire and to fantasize about in order to lift you out of your hum-drum lives.

Jealousy is an ugly thing. Don’t you have anything better to do than attempt to tear down your betters?

Oh, please. She hasn't gone out of her way to attack him but she's not defending him either.

You sound like a Republican Trumpster who wants to bash her for being "woke"

If she had integrity, she would denounce him. And in doing so, she would fundamentally change the royal family for the better, by helping to make them accountable to the society which supports them. That would be a brave, democratic thing to do.

OP/R7/Anti-Meghan loon, you really attach a lot of importance on her, when she's really quite a minor member of the firm known as the Royal Family, and has zero cultural or historic significance. Of course, like any extended family member of any family, she's under no obligation say or do anything. So your criticism of her is worthless and your assertion is made only to condemn her further.

I know right? And while we’re at it why hasn’t she picked up an ak-47 and flown to Ukraine to defend that country from Russian aggression?

[quote]People in the upper echelons of society are very different from the hoi polloi.

For starters, they know that "the" is superfluous in front of "hoi polloi."

She also hasn't spoken on the plight of women with irritable bowel syndrome. WHAT'S STOPPING THAT SELFISH CUNT FROM MAKING A DIFFERENCE?

And WHY, if Sparkle's so WOKE, didn't she go back in time to warn her now-dead mother-in-law, the saintly Princess Diana, about what was in store for her that night in the tunnel? WHY DIDN'T YOU, MEGHAN, YOU CUNT???!!!

MURDERER!!!!

Some of us don't care much about Meghan or Prince Andrew. So there's that.

R13, tell that to OP, who's made it his life's mission to DESTROY HER!!!

[quote]fundamentally change the royal family for the better, by helping to make them accountable to the society which supports them. That would be a brave, democratic thing to do.

I think someone is missing the whole point of royalty. It’s too bad Her Majesty can no longer lock people in the Tower of London.

"It’s too bad Her Majesty can no longer lock people in the Tower of London."

Yes, it's always a shame when "Divine Right" is no longer the way of the world, R15.

[R7], if you ever find yourself in Paris... I urge you at all costs to avoid the Alma Tunnel.

The Queen should cancel Parliament and order them all beheaded! Then she should start ruling again!

People who think that "denouncing a child rapist in your own extended family" can be reasonably equated to "denouncing a common human bowel disorder" or "why can't Meghan travel in time" are too stupid for this earth.

And R19, you're too dense to understand irony or sarcasm. And only you give a fuck about her.

The rest of us are laughing at you, R19.

R19 Those posters were being sardonic, you complete cretin.

Are you familiar with the Dunning-Kruger effect? “Stupid people are too stupid to understand how stupid they are”.

That’s you. So, be quiet before you embarrass yourself again.

I'm still waiting for her to whip out her tit and breastfeed in public. She was going to "normalize" breastfeeding don't you know?

Zzzzzzz.

OP trying to make this woman a target of outrage and no one here cares to share his sad obsession.

r10 they probably wouldn't. The Mountbatten-Winsdors are notoriously stupid.

Because Markle is a glorified trophy wife and a faux-progressive.

So what, R27?

Oh poo shoes, you’re exhausting

But has she asked him is he's doing OK? Because no one hardly ever asks, you know.

r22 I am not a cretin, and the general rule is that anyone who references Dunning-Kruger in the service of their own ends is likely misusing it, as is the case here.

r21 Please stop laughing at me!

r20 But It's not irony nor sarcasm; the moronic analogies fail both tests. I might generously call it satire, but unless the satirical posts mentioned were actually supporting the idea that woke harry and meghan should call out their rapist family member and support the victims of his crimes--many of whom are underage girls--then it fails that test too and devolves into ham-handed misdirection.

And you're wrong again, I personally don't care one IOTA about meghan, harry, the queen, andrew, or any given rich person--what I care about is woke consistency, or more correctly the lack thereof.

"I personally don't care one IOTA about meghan..."

Oh my sides, R31! I'd hate to see what you'd do if you cared about her!

We're STILL laughing at you.

R31 is CONSTANTLY posting threads about this woman and yet claims he's not obsessed!

So she should get off the state payroll, R27. That’s “what”. You can pay her instead if you want to. My taxes can be used for better services than for providing security-men for that waste-of-space trophy-wife.

*Meant R28

Because she's a "glorified trophy wife and a faux-progressive" (your words @ R27) she should get off the state payroll? That makes no sense, but nothing does in your world does.

In fact, people like you are the reason she needs security!

I would say he's the trophy husband.

So many depraved, wizened fraus posting here.

Actually, she should be defending him. As we all know, she can understand only too well what it's like to be pilloried by the press and public. He's family, the "family she never had." But it turned out she married into a family even trashier than her own.

I think Andrew is a greedy, stupid, arrogant, entitled man. But I have little sympathy for his accuser and so-called victim Ms Giuffre.

"But I have little sympathy for his accuser and so-called victim Ms Giuffre."

So there are no victims in any of this, huh, R40? Everyone is culpable?

There are numerous victims of sexual trafficking in this sad old world, R41, eg, the captured Yazidi girls, the Rotherham school girls, the Nigerian schoolgirls kidnapped by Boko Harum, the Nepali girls sold into prostitution in India, the Thai girls sold into prostitution by their own families, etc, etc, etc. But judging from the photo of Virginia Roberts, aged 17, she is not one of them.

Amen, r42. No one ever wants to talk about the Rotherham (and all the other UK cities full of trafficked girls) - or indeed the Yazidi and Boko Haram sex slaves - so take an upvote for remembering them.

And you're right, Virginia Roberts doesn't seem to fall into the same category.

It’s smart of her to keep her trap shut on this one.

But it’s not out of family loyalty or better judgment. It’s just that it takes attention away from herself.

R44, how does her six week break from the limelight tally with your view of Meghan as an attention junkie? No headlines, no pictures.

R45, it doesn’t make a difference. You think Sunshine Sachs has stopped working on that account? The Daily Fail and People are still running pieces about them.

No photos or new stories, just speculation - and none of it placed by her PR. You are obsessed with Sunshine Sachs, R46. Literally fixated.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R48, People is a gossip magazine. It gossips, it speculates, it pretends to have sources. Why would Meghan place a harmful story like that? You have no concept of how the media works.

Why, OP? Because no doubt she is thrilled that the pitiless public censure has shifted from her to Andrew. Just as Kate, formerly known as Duchess Doolittle, was thrilled by the spotlight shifting to MM's missteps.

Cuckoo!

Finally you hoes have stopped talking about Meghan Markle.