Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Tulsi Gabbard slams Kamala Harris as 'not qualified to serve as commander in chief'

[quote]"Kamala Harris is not qualified to serve as commander in chief and I can say this from a personal perspective as a soldier," Gabbard said on Fox Sports Radio. "She has no background or experience in foreign policy and she lacks the temperament that is necessary for commander in chief."

Girlfriend, you are so on.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 105November 12, 2019 10:11 PM

That argument doesn't work now that we have had Trump. Sorry, Tulsi.

by Anonymousreply 1July 24, 2019 1:52 AM

Lacks the temperament? Tulsi is cray-cray.

by Anonymousreply 2July 24, 2019 1:53 AM

Oh Please, this homophobic former Repug bitch suddenly friend of the gay community is not fooling anyone. And her sad attempt to get attention by attacking another candidate is completely transparent. Maybe she should have just tried harder during the first round of debates.

by Anonymousreply 3July 24, 2019 1:54 AM

What’s “Tulsi” mean, anyway? The plural of Tulsa?

by Anonymousreply 4July 24, 2019 1:54 AM

Agree with R3.

She should not be considered seriously as a Democratic candidate after working for her father's anti-gay marriage organization.

by Anonymousreply 5July 24, 2019 2:00 AM

That second night of the second debates is going to be... wow. I can already sense a "I was that little girl who was told she'll never be qualified enough" coming.

Tulsi is so fucking finished after this. She's won't know what hit her after Kamala is done with her. She'll just wake up the next morning with a full head of white hair.

by Anonymousreply 6July 24, 2019 2:01 AM

This dumb bitch! I hope Kamala draaags her ass.

by Anonymousreply 7July 24, 2019 2:02 AM

Kamala certainly has potential but she seems a lot of talk and very little action as well as changing her policies like musical chairs.

by Anonymousreply 8July 24, 2019 2:04 AM

No one running is really qualified. Biden is the closest merely because he was VP.

by Anonymousreply 9July 24, 2019 2:04 AM

And what foreign experience did an Arkansas Governor have? A scofflaw son of CIA Director? An Illinois community organizer? Fuck her.

Don't worry, she will never make it to the third debate.

by Anonymousreply 10July 24, 2019 2:04 AM

[QUOTE]And her sad attempt to get attention by attacking another candidate is completely transparent.

Isn’t that what Kamala did?

by Anonymousreply 11July 24, 2019 2:09 AM

r10 Right? How the fuck do you even get foreign policy experience aside from working for the State Department, serving on the Foreign Relations committee, or being the former VP? Even serving in the war doesn't give you that experience. So that basically excludes most candidates.

by Anonymousreply 12July 24, 2019 2:09 AM

Why did Tulsi feel the need to randomly lash out at Kamala?

by Anonymousreply 13July 24, 2019 2:10 AM

Geez, I am not Kamala's biggest fan, but I can't with this bitch.

by Anonymousreply 14July 24, 2019 2:11 AM

r13 It's not random, Beto has been subtweeting Pete as well. It's a desperate attempt to provoke a showdown during the second debate and then qualify for the third due to the resulting bump in donors and in the polls. Beto has already qualified for that, so Tulsi is naturally more shameless in her attacks.

by Anonymousreply 15July 24, 2019 2:14 AM

Both are qualified.

Between the two, and others, I'd care more about whether they are *worthy*.

We already know Trump is neither qualified nor worthy so this Canadian urges D no matter who, or at the very worst sit out/not vote R.

by Anonymousreply 16July 24, 2019 2:16 AM

Alternative take: neither is qualified. And that's perfectly fine because that's what the cabinet and the generals and the countless advisors and the intelligence community is for.

by Anonymousreply 17July 24, 2019 2:19 AM

Neither were W, Obama or the current asshole-in chief. Although I liked Obama after two and a half years.

by Anonymousreply 18July 24, 2019 2:19 AM

r12, I agree but I would add that being a military intelligence officer would give you access to a vast repository of information and insight into foreign affairs that the others do not have.

by Anonymousreply 19July 24, 2019 2:22 AM

Tulsa...you in danger, gurl!

by Anonymousreply 20July 24, 2019 2:31 AM

To excel in foreign policy is not difficult if one has the temperament

Apparently

**I** have the temperament.

by Anonymousreply 21July 24, 2019 2:33 AM

Stop trying to make Tulsi happen, Gretchen!

by Anonymousreply 22July 24, 2019 2:57 AM

Her argument is garbage. We have generals and admirals to lead the troops strategically, and so on. A commander in chief needs to have the force options explained to him or her and make the difficult decisions, such as FDR’s decision to prioritize the defeat of Germany before japan in WWII. Can Kamala do that? Yes.

by Anonymousreply 23July 24, 2019 3:07 AM

Because she was in the military, Tulsi suddenly has foreign policy experience?

LOLOLOLOL

by Anonymousreply 24July 24, 2019 3:10 AM

The fact that she's telling this to Fox Sports Radio is a pretty good indication of how well her campaign is doing.

by Anonymousreply 25July 24, 2019 3:11 AM

[quote]Gabbard served in a field medical unit of the Hawaii Army National Guard in a combat zone in Iraq from 2004 to 2005 and was deployed to Kuwait from 2008 to 2009.

[quote]On October 12, 2015, Gabbard was promoted from captain to major at a ceremony at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific. Akaka administered the oath of office to the new major. She continues to serve as a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard.

Nor is a worker on the factory floor in Shenzen, China, is qualified to run Apple, even if she became a supervisor or manager.

by Anonymousreply 26July 24, 2019 3:19 AM

Yawn, do we still live in a world where people think you need experience in the military to be President?

This attack feels so damn old school.

by Anonymousreply 27July 24, 2019 3:38 AM

She's just emphasizing the fact that she's a vet and can't attack Biden who is a veteran also.

by Anonymousreply 28July 24, 2019 3:49 AM

Tulsi will disappear after the July debate.

by Anonymousreply 29July 24, 2019 3:52 AM

[quote]Harris as 'not qualified to serve as commander in chief'

Gabbard is right. But neither is she or any of the other candidates.

by Anonymousreply 30July 24, 2019 3:52 AM

[quote]Biden who is a veteran also

Nope.

by Anonymousreply 31July 24, 2019 3:54 AM

Tulsi must know she doesn't have a chance right now. Perhaps she's doing this hoping to take Kamala down a few pegs to help out the other top contenders.

by Anonymousreply 32July 24, 2019 4:06 AM

Uncle Joe must have asked Tootsie to take the bullet for him in Detroit on July 31, 2019. What a cunty homophobic bitch!

by Anonymousreply 33July 24, 2019 4:12 AM

[quote]I agree but I would add that being a military intelligence officer would give you access to a vast repository of information and insight into foreign affairs that the others do not have.

Like durgs, depression and PTSD? It's not 1950 anymore Gramp. Most military have very little exposure to the big picture. They are trained for a very specific job and that's all they get to see. You have to be way up there like a General before you get that kind of worldly exposure to foreign affairs.

by Anonymousreply 34July 24, 2019 8:53 AM

Tulsa is a crooked DINO looking for attention by attacking another female candidate like the snake she truly is.

by Anonymousreply 35July 24, 2019 4:55 PM

If this even becomes an issue during the debate, and Kamala says she'll rely on the advice of miliary advisors, I hope Tulsi says something along the lines of, "Why do you have to rely on the advice of a bunch of men if you're such a strong women?"

ZING!!!

by Anonymousreply 36July 24, 2019 5:03 PM

If there is a showdown between these two next week, imagine the hair action that'll go down. Tulsi won't look Kamala's way because she likes to look into the camera instead so as not to mess her blowout (watch her catfight with Ryan), but Kamala will be whipping her hair around like nobody's business.

by Anonymousreply 37July 24, 2019 5:17 PM

Democrats are a mess. We’re gonna be stuck with Trump a total of 8 years.

by Anonymousreply 38July 24, 2019 5:20 PM

Shouldn't Tulsi be getting a good dermabrasion prior to the next debate?

by Anonymousreply 39July 24, 2019 5:23 PM

[quote] She's just emphasizing the fact that she's a vet and can't attack Biden who is a veteran also.

A veteran of what??! Fucking up?

by Anonymousreply 40July 24, 2019 5:23 PM

I admit I started doubting my recollection of historical events when someone mentioned Biden being a veteran.

He *is* a veteran of paperology and building close personal relationships to climb higher, though.

by Anonymousreply 41July 24, 2019 5:28 PM

I’m not voting for Harris simply because the way CNN and NBC and the DNC are pushing her is one gigantic red flag. More foreign intervention? No thanks. A former prosecutor with an abominable record? Yikes!

And, this is vital, Gabbard somehow can be a liberal in current year without demonizing white people and men. Shocking!

The best part of the debates, hands down, was when Gabbard disemboweled Harris and the best part of the aftermath was how the champagne socialist establishment tried to smear her as a Russian asset. LMFAO. But surely Datalounge is au courant and knows screaming “but Russia” when they have no facts to back up their bullshit is passé, right?

Surely I won’t be called Boris for liking Gabbard?

(If not, pease FF me so you can stay in your bubble until your 2016 tactics re-elect your boogeyman, thereby embiggening what is shaping up to be quite the post-2020 salt mine.)

by Anonymousreply 42August 1, 2019 8:44 PM

So then you support gay conversion therapy R42. Got it.

by Anonymousreply 43August 1, 2019 8:49 PM

[quote] Tulsi will disappear after the July debate.

Didn't seem to work out that way.

by Anonymousreply 44August 1, 2019 9:03 PM

I wish they'd stop attacking each other. Let this be on policy. Giving them any ammunition makes me cringe. Tulsi can suck it.

by Anonymousreply 45August 1, 2019 9:17 PM

Harris' office kept innocent men in prison on technicalities to keep up her conviction score. She pressed through a needless lynching law based on an obvious hoax by Jussie. She's not qualified and it doesn't take Gabbard to point that out.

by Anonymousreply 46August 1, 2019 9:29 PM

Tulsi got really nasty today on MSNBC when they asked about her friendly visit with Syrian Dictator Assad. How dare they ask her about it? Frankly, I think she's a little nutty.

by Anonymousreply 47August 1, 2019 9:33 PM

Why does the fact that she worships a murdering dictator like Assad bother you people? Sheesh. It's not like she's pro gay conversion therapy or something.

by Anonymousreply 48August 1, 2019 9:48 PM

Is it wrong of me to hope Tulsi & Kam have a physical fight?

That aside, fuck 'em both. Tulsi's a nut and Kam kares about Kam. Her constituent services efforts are a joke.

by Anonymousreply 49August 2, 2019 1:31 AM

Warren next on the firing line.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50September 26, 2019 4:06 PM

Besides being a Russian stooge, isn't Gabbard the member of a religious cult that stands just this side of Scientology on the crazy scale?

by Anonymousreply 51September 26, 2019 4:18 PM

Just say NO to the libertarian Hare Krishna cult trying to claw their way into politics.

Imagine these people setting up shop in the White House. Skinny shaven head cult members creating a cacophony with their mindless chanting and banging on drums.

by Anonymousreply 52September 26, 2019 4:56 PM

I can't get past the fact Tulsi is anti-gay and only apologised because she had to. Girl, bye!

by Anonymousreply 53September 26, 2019 5:06 PM

Of all the candidates in this race, why is this Tulsi woman so focused on Kamala? She's not even in the top four in the polls.

by Anonymousreply 54September 26, 2019 5:17 PM

So, Tulsi Gabbard is the first person to come around on gay rights? Why be hard on her and not virtually all the others?

by Anonymousreply 55September 26, 2019 5:19 PM

I can’t stand this pockmarked bitch.

by Anonymousreply 56September 26, 2019 5:21 PM

No, I'm sorry but you misunderstood: She was the LAST person to come around on gay rights. You see the difference there?

As far as I'm concerned, she can go cry in Assad's arms. She's a creep.

by Anonymousreply 57September 26, 2019 8:44 PM

R57' No she wasn't. . She supported marriage equaity before Biden'Obama, and Hillary did.

by Anonymousreply 58September 26, 2019 9:03 PM

Fun Fact: Tusli spelled backwards is:

by Anonymousreply 59September 26, 2019 9:10 PM

Tulsi? This is a person named Tulsi?

by Anonymousreply 60September 27, 2019 12:34 AM

Is Kulfi the Hindu homo-hater still running? I thought she had fucked off back to Assad's asshole by now.

by Anonymousreply 61September 27, 2019 12:47 AM

Tulsa needs to shut her Russian asset twat.

She is a embarrassment.

by Anonymousreply 62September 27, 2019 12:49 AM

People are speculating she might take on (out?) Warren at the October debate.

by Anonymousreply 63September 27, 2019 12:55 AM

Well Tulsi, not to worry because Harris hasn't a chance in Hell at getting the nomination.

by Anonymousreply 64September 27, 2019 12:57 AM

What an odd target. Kamala isn't even leading in the polls. But women are their own worst enemies.

by Anonymousreply 65September 27, 2019 12:59 AM

r65 This happened back in July when Kamala got her her main polling bump after attacking Biden at the first debate. I only bumped the thread because Tulsi has now brought up a similar argument against Warren. Seems like this will be her main line of attack.

by Anonymousreply 66September 27, 2019 1:04 AM

You guys only hate her because straight guys want to lick her butthole and not yours. lol.

by Anonymousreply 67September 27, 2019 1:16 AM

Not surprising. She seems the male-identified type who hasn't any woman friends other than a female sibling/relative (so long as they're not prettier/more successful than she).

Her religious beliefs are suspect, and the fact she either bristles or verbally misdirects when asked direct questions about it, shows she has no integrity. Any devoutly religious person who does this is untrustworthy.

She is repulsive.

by Anonymousreply 68September 27, 2019 1:19 AM

Tulsi said NO MORE WASTEFUL WARS FOR ISRAEL! Love her.

by Anonymousreply 69September 27, 2019 1:21 AM

Harris needs to reply.

by Anonymousreply 70September 27, 2019 1:21 AM

She's one of the 12 Impeachment Holdouts in the Dem caucus.

by Anonymousreply 71September 27, 2019 3:42 PM

Tulsa needs to be primaried.

by Anonymousreply 72September 27, 2019 3:44 PM

I find it more than suspect that Tulsi is on Fox and RT complaining and sniping about other Democrats, instead of the Orange Anus.

Primary her pizza pie faced ass and get rid of her, Hawaii!

by Anonymousreply 73September 27, 2019 3:49 PM

Why is she attacking someone in 4th place who has really a slim chance of improving that? Is Tulsi running for VP and thinks that Kamala is a potential for that spot? I don't think Kamala will take a VP spot unless it's with Biden who will tell her he is only seeking 1 term. But seriously what is Tulsi goal to keep giving attention to someone not in the running. Perhaps Kamala can run with the attention and make a headline because no one is talking about her but Tulsi.

by Anonymousreply 74September 27, 2019 4:06 PM

Was explained at r66. She attacked Kamala when it looked like she would rise to the very top.

by Anonymousreply 75September 27, 2019 4:14 PM

Her district is strongly Democratic - Hillary Clinton won it overwhelmingly. So why exactly is she against impeachment?

I suspect it's because her friends Putin and Assad prefer having Trump in office.

by Anonymousreply 76September 27, 2019 8:45 PM

I'm surprised she's still in the race.

by Anonymousreply 77September 27, 2019 8:48 PM

Tulsi's hubby has the ghey face.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 78September 27, 2019 8:59 PM

She's a Republican plant, the Jill Stein of 2020.

by Anonymousreply 79September 27, 2019 9:09 PM

Not defending Tulsi at all, I don't like her -- but I have done exhaustive research on Harris and she is a despicable human being. She willfully ignored police brutality cases (while making claims about the death of Michael Garner), she fought body cameras, she fought mandatory investigations in to murders committed by police officers. She fought to keep an innocent man on DEATH ROW over a paperwork technicality... think about that: innocent man + death sentence + paperwork technicality (she lost, thankfully). What kind of human being does that? One without a conscience, a psychopath. She ignored pleas for justice from victims of Catholic priests. She fought to keep prisoners eligible for parole in jail for the cheap labor. She let Mnuchin off the hook. She did nothing to stop fracking. A federal judge condemned her office's actions for violating the constitutional rights of 600+ people. Not even going into her frequent lies, several big Pinocchios there... If a Republican DA/AG had done all that, Democrats would be demanding justice, and rightfully so.

by Anonymousreply 80September 27, 2019 9:17 PM

She has a primary challenger for her seat in the House. And she is NOT paying attention to any House campaign.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 81September 27, 2019 9:26 PM

She now supports the impeachment inquiry.

by Anonymousreply 82September 27, 2019 9:50 PM

Because her Republican puppet masters told her to.

by Anonymousreply 83September 27, 2019 9:51 PM

Fuck this Putin puppet cunt!

by Anonymousreply 84September 27, 2019 10:26 PM

[quote] but I have done exhaustive research on Harris

Why?

by Anonymousreply 85September 27, 2019 11:19 PM

I would agree

by Anonymousreply 86September 28, 2019 12:49 AM

Cute fiance.

by Anonymousreply 87September 28, 2019 2:38 AM

So she's evolved on impeachment. We don't need leaders who evolve. We need leaders who lead.

by Anonymousreply 88September 28, 2019 5:36 AM

R88, Then you certainly dont want Biden because he hasn't led on anything ever.

by Anonymousreply 89September 28, 2019 5:45 AM

R80, Everything you said is true.

Her supporters have a lot of damn nerve bringing up Pete's issue with the police in south bend constantly. If he had half of that bullshit on his record he wouldn't even be allowed to be in the race anymore.

by Anonymousreply 90September 28, 2019 5:47 AM

R88 you're right. I'm not a big fan of Biden.

by Anonymousreply 91September 28, 2019 5:53 AM

Pock-marked, homophobic, cult-member Tulsi WAS trash, IS trash and always WILL BE trash... Why does anyone care what this repulsive excuse for a human being has to say about anyone? Kamala is an educated, accomplished, eloquent AG and widely-regarded Senator who is fighting for the fate of this country and all of our citizens. Kamala is a patriot and elegant woman in EVERY WAY. Tulsi was the LAST to agree with impeachment of Trumpy Bear.....LAST. Who in Hell cares what Tulsi has to say about anything???? She is as likable as Mother Pence. Gag..

by Anonymousreply 92September 28, 2019 6:19 AM

R92' I bet you said the same things about Hillary that your saying about Kamala.

by Anonymousreply 93September 28, 2019 6:25 AM

Tulsi = TRASH

by Anonymousreply 94September 28, 2019 6:37 AM

[quote]What an odd target. Kamala isn't even leading in the polls. But women are their own worst enemies.

Because she knows if Biden gets the nod it will be Biden/Kamala and she wants to be the first woman Vice President.

by Anonymousreply 95September 28, 2019 9:13 AM

R95. She has nothing to worry about. That ticket wouldn’t win.

by Anonymousreply 96September 28, 2019 9:56 PM

Yep, R95 - my guess is that Biden will choose Kamala if he gets the nom (despite the little hiccup with the first debate). She fills in for everything that he is weak on (except the midwest vote I suppose). Whether or not she will accept is the big question. She is currently a very powerful senator from a very powerful state.

by Anonymousreply 97September 29, 2019 2:55 AM

Just curious: evolving on impeachment overnight isn't acceptable, but evolving on gay marriage after decades is (Obama, Clinton, Biden)? Evolving from being a decades-long Republican and voting for Reagan during the onset of the AIDS epidemic is acceptable (Warren), but evolving on impeachment overnight isn't?

by Anonymousreply 98September 29, 2019 3:30 AM

A lot of people didn't support impeachment because there weren't grounds for it yet. Once the facts came out about Trumps behavior in regards to to Ukraine of course she changed her tune. SO DID NANCY PELOSI.

by Anonymousreply 99September 29, 2019 4:28 AM

[quote] Whether or not she will accept is the big question. She is currently a very powerful senator from a very powerful state.

She (Kamala Harris) would accept (running as VP with Biden running for POTUS). 100% sure.

by Anonymousreply 100September 29, 2019 5:03 AM

Tulsi Gabbard on David Duke's Twitter banner.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 101November 12, 2019 9:08 PM

r101 Oy vey. 😬

by Anonymousreply 102November 12, 2019 9:10 PM

Gabbard will be in next debate (November), so watch for more fireworks.

by Anonymousreply 103November 12, 2019 10:05 PM

Not only will she be at the debate next week, she's also cusping when it comes to the December debate, i.e. she needs just one more qualifying poll before December 12th.

by Anonymousreply 104November 12, 2019 10:08 PM

I wish this bitch would go away.

by Anonymousreply 105November 12, 2019 10:11 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!