British Royal Family Gossip Part 87

Meghan is cute with a sweet face.

New thread, let's see how long this lasts.

She'll have another child. My guess is the marriage cracks up somewhere closer to the seven to ten year mark. Diana and Charles, from marriage to divorce, managed fifteen years. They had different pressures to stick it out. Andrew and Fergie, probably a better comparison (both idiots, both clueless, both self absorbed, and to some degree both in love with each other), lasted from 1986 before separating in 1992 and divorcing in 1996.

Then again, as others pointed out, she's rapidly cruising forty... time's a wastin'. She may settle for the Duke and Duchess of Windsor model and just live with him in the relative financial comfort of prideful, brittle, annually increasing contempt.

If she regains the skinny figure he loves, they will stay together.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Could you explain again her title and what will happen if she divorces?

The Sun taking the piss?

LASTING LEGACY Meghan Markle will fulfil the Queen’s final wishes when she dies by continuing the popularity of the Royal Family, according to expert

The Queen relies on Meghan's counsel so it will come as no surprise that there's talk of creating a new title for Meghan as "counselor to the Queen." Kate sees the move as a threat, however.

I can't be arsed to wade through hundreds and hundreds and HUNDREDS of previous posts, so if this has already been posted, tough titties.

Prince Harry Pushing Meghan Markle To Seek Therapy ‘Before It’s Too Late’

Megan Markle will fulfill the Queen's final wishes when she dies, R7?

I know a lot of people here dislike her, but that's maybe taking it too far.

She'll divorce Harry and be a reality star like a Kardashian.

7 to 10 years then a divorce but they will despise each other long before that.

So International Business Insider is considered a reliable source, now?

[QUOTE] Could you explain again her title and what will happen if she divorces?

—Said no one

😂😂😂 Keep the Photographs Troll far hence too.

Now Danja Zone is getting mentioned in the thread post? She’s a crazed flyover state frau with a Meghan complex.

What was REALLY in Rachel's head.

Christ what's this? Seizure in the Greenhouse?

George resembles Kate's father Michael Middleton.

This is too much! The Sussexes posted this as a birthday greeting to Prince George.

Meghan looks very cracked out in that photo

r19, They might never have spent any real time with him, but they could at least have used a picture with him as the focus. pair of arsewipes.

R21, right? Perhaps an autographed, framed copy of this, as a birthday present.

The fuck...?

The Harkles probably don't have any fairly recent photos--or any photos at all of them with George. The wedding photo is probably not the best photo for the kid's birthday, but it's the best they have. Plus, George may get a kick out of the photo since he can have fun remembering that he was part of their wedding. Kids may like that sort of thing--and it's not any deeper than that. I'm no fan of the FrogCott duo, but the photo they posted is likely all they have.

If Will and Kate have a little birthday party for George, it would be nice if H&M attended, if they're invited.

If Meghan is still around in 10 years, she'll be around forever. She'll be pushing 50 at that point, and her options as an actress/lifestyle guru would be limited. If she's going to jump, even if she plans to take Harry with her, she has to do it soonish.

R23 - the wedding photo is the best they have? With Harry and Meghan as the focus of the photo with George as a supporting player? Why didn't they use one of Kate's new photos of George like they did with Louis?

To top it all off, they didn't even say his name. They just posted "Happy Birthday". If we didn't know who was celebrating, it could have been for Harry, Meghan, George or the other boy in the photo. They forget people's titles or they don't bother to acknowledge them at all. These two clowns NEVER get it right.

Can't stand the rancid ho but they didn't post that at all. That's from a stan Insta page.

HOW DARE SHE!

r26, Oops I never checked so I stand corrected. (r21), thanks.

George seems to have graduated to ordinary boy's clothes. Goodbye to Peter Pan collars on smocked blouses and Mary Jane shoes.

They can pass along all that Edwardian shit to Louis and Archie.

r19. I think that's just a kiddie version of a suit and tie at the formal events.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Swipe for photos of Charles and Camilla at the Royal Welsh Show.

Diana tried to like horses, she really did. I can tell by her face that it didn't go well. The second photo is her with the Queen.

R32, yeah, that seemed to be in the comment section, not a post. Which is even worse, IMO. What a pair of cunts.

R34, I believe horses can sense unease in humans who are riding them.

They can R35 , absolutely.

R25. Yes, that's the only photo the Harkle's have of them with George. You have to remember that the Harkles and Will and Kate barely see each other--they're not all that friendly--so of course, they're not going to have photos of each others' kids readily available. The reason Markle could post a single photo of Louis on his birthday taken by Kate is because Louis is only one year old. He has no idea what's going on, so a single shot of him alone is fine. However, with George, he's at an age where it's kind of fun for a kid to see himself in a photo with other people, in this case, his aunt and uncle. And the wedding photo is all the Harkles have even though the focus of that particular photo is really on Harkle duo and not on George. But at this age, George doesn't realize family dynamics and that he's really not the focus of the photo--he just knows that he's in the photo. He just sees a photo of himself smiling with his aunt and uncle--and for a six-year old having a birthday, that's probably good enough for him. And I'm sure Will and Kate are well aware that the Harkles have no photos of the Cambridge kids since neither family sees each other all that often.

One thing...the Harkles could have named Prince George in their birthday wish rather than simply this generic wish, but that's them. They also could have signed the Instagram with "Love from Harry and Meghan." But again, that's them.

R37, they didn't post a picture, that's from a stan site. They did post a generic greeting on KP's Instagram, though. Making sure they (she) was the first to post. But no picture.

She didn't mention his name, though. She just cannot bring herself to address those kids by their titles, and this time not even his name, whereas everyone else does. Yet she will call herself The Duchess, and Her Royal Highness, every bloody second sentence when posting about herself on Insta.

She is one nasty little cunt. Well, big cunt, these days.

'Kylie Jenner is what - 20? She's young and independently wealthy. Meghan is middle-aged. Seriously, she's practically 40 years old. That's just not hot'

Kim Kardashian is 39 years old and considered super hot, with 120m followers. The exact same people who like her like Meghan.

George's eyes are like black holes in his head, so deep set with the standard Kate eyebags underneath. At least he will be tall, I guess, but he'll never be a looker.

Any six-year old who’s being raised by sensible people is going to give two shits about their parents’ social media. Oh mommy, did Auntie Meghan post a photo of me on her Instagram? No. He just wants to throw water balloons at his party and is hoping someone defied his parents’ wishes and bought him a Nerf gun.

The slight was aimed at his parents. George doesn’t know and wouldn’t care if he did.

'To top it all off, they didn't even say his name. They just posted "Happy Birthday". If we didn't know who was celebrating, it could have been for Harry, Meghan, George or the other boy in the photo. They forget people's titles or they don't bother to acknowledge them at all. These two clowns NEVER get it right. '

It's not a question of not getting it right, it's a question of throwing shade, bitches. Which they will continue to do.

R38. Markle has ghosted her father. And is doesn't even seem like she's all that friendly with her mother. So you think it matters to her that she didn't post a photo of George or call him by name on the birthday wish? Not really. It's the furthest thing from her mind. However, I'm a bit surprised that Harry didn't think to name George in the birthday wish and sign his and his wife's name. I mean, Harry has known George since he was born--it's his brother's kid for god's sake. Harry could have made sure the greeting was a little warmer and more personal even if it seems to be lost or ignored by his wife.

R33 Is that Camilla on the left then?

Meghan will continue to undermine the BRF any chance she gets, and we are here for it

R44. Just to clarify, no, Camilla is not a cow; she's a Rottweiler.

[QUOTE] Harry could have made sure the greeting was a little warmer and more personal even if it seems to be lost or ignored by his wife.

Harry is ghosting Le Bald as much as he can. Their feud has reached Shakespearean proportions. Why else do you think he moved out to Windsor?

[quote] Why else do you think he moved out to Windsor?

Because his Granny booted him and his missus out of KP.

If Beatrice wants her wedding to be televised (and let's be honest, someone who dresses the way she does clearly enjoys being the centre of attention), she'll have to get moving. If Kate and/or Meghan have another two children between them, Beatrice will be knocked out of the top ten in line for the throne.

R49, she'll get her wedding televised even if there were ten more children. But marrying a guy with a toddler he's abandoned makes the Harkle optics look pristine.

[quote]Why else do you think he moved out to Windsor?

R47. Because after consultations between the RF and the gray men who run Buck House headquarters, Harry was told: "You're moving."

R39, Who are you dragging? Kim? Meg? Both?

[QUOTE] Who are you dragging? Kim? Meg? Both?

Nope, just disproving your theory that IG followers lose interest when a woman hits 40.

[QUOTE] Because after consultations between the RF and the gray men who run Buck House headquarters, Harry was told: "You're moving

Harry insisted on moving and demanded the 3m for renovations. KP would have been a much cheaper solution. Hilarious that you, Skippy and all the other clowns believe in 'grey men'.

Nothing disproven. Kim's old too. It's her sisters and her family controversy that keeps her relevant.

Meg - to the extent she was every sexy - no longer is sexy. She's flat-chested with a broad ass and even broader nose. She's uncultured and ungrateful and unloved.

Everyone hates her, and she keeps stepping on her own dick.

R54, Get out. KP is tony. Toad Hall is flyover country. The Harkles are an embarrassment, and they're being appropriately banished. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

R50, Nothing is going to make the Harkles look good. Bea isn't suckling at the taxpayer teat, so she can do whatever she pleases.

[QUOTE] Get out. KP is tony. Toad Hall is flyover country. The Harkles are an embarrassment, and they're being appropriately banished. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Windsor Park is beautiful. London is heavily polluted and way too hot and humid in the summer. Harry wanted to raise his child far away from his brother's toxic presence, and who can blame him?

[QUOTE] Meg - to the extent she was every sexy - no longer is sexy. She's flat-chested with a broad ass and even broader nose. She's uncultured and ungrateful and unloved.

And yet soon her IG will overtake Kate's. MM is adored worldwide. One of the most popular women on the planet. Her failure to snap back to a UK 6 straight after having Archie makes her more endearing to ordinary people who don't judge others by how much they weigh.

Obviously, the average basic bitch on the DL doesn't get her appeal, especially the 100 lb Asian troll who keeps saying Chinese people are the most attractive people on earth.

R58, If Frog Cot were desirable, then someone other than Baldy the Ginger and the Duchess of Griftenstein would have claimed it by now. It's been in the royal family for generations. Nobody wanted it for good reason, and it's only become less desirable.

Get as high as you want, nobody will judge you for that, but don't expect us to believe your rantings under the influence.

You dipshit.

R59, Meg is loathed in the UK. You know - where she grifts from the taxpayers? Not even the mouthbreathers who watch WAGs like her.

[QUOTE] You dipshit.

Are you that ugly tinhat HKN from the Robsten fandom? She used that word all the time.

H and M chose a house they could refit from top to bottom in their own style. If they'd stayed at KP it would have cost the tax payer 3m less, but H wanted to separate most definitively from Bald and Replikate.

[QUOTE] Meg is loathed in the UK. You know - where she grifts from the taxpayers? Not even the mouthbreathers who watch WAGs like her.

She has millions of 18-40 Uk followers. A few stuffy, dour old Tories like you dislike her, but they'll all be dead soon. She gets 1m more likes than jobless Kate on her IG posts.

R62 - No. What's a HKN or a Robsten? Nevermind, no-one gives a shit.

The Harkles were kicked out of KP. They're an embarrassment and the taxpayers loathe them. The whole point of banishing them to Africa is to get them out of the way so they stop angering the populace and embarrassing the BRF. Meg is just flat out ugly.

(T)roll Call

Grifter Troll

I have a hard time imagining Megantoinette happy out at Windsor. It's countryside. This is a sewer creature from LA... even gray, cold Toronto would have been livelier than Windsor Great Park. The Frog Cottage thing is a complete mystery to me. Unless someone decided she's not in for the long term, so in a divorce inducing her to leave Frog Pond would be easier than inducing her to leave KP.

I'm still amazed she agreed to it.

[QUOTE] The whole point of banishing them to Africa is to get them out of the way so they stop angering the populace and embarrassing the BRF. Meg is just flat out ugly.

Is your name Joey Deacon?

They haven't been banished to Africa any more than Stepford and Bald have been banished to Pakistan. They're visiting on a royal tour, staying in luxury hotels/lodges.

R63, Bless your heart.

No, even the rags are getting quite open about their disdain for her. She's loathed. That self-important show at Wimbledon was probably the last straw. She's too dumb to understand the difference between celebrity and royalty. She's a grifter, sucking up money from the UK populace. And her nose should be a ski slope at the Olympics.

How is it possible to have such a broad ass, yet so flat and unattractive? It's like she's already 55. Middle-age has already arrived for Duchess Smegma.

[QUOTE] She's a grifter, sucking up money from the UK populace.

Jesus, how tired and trite this is. Kate is a much worse grifter who has gone 38 years without doing a day's honest work. She even went on holiday to the Maldives when George was 6 months old and LEFT HIM BEHIND! She did that just two weeks after a Mustique vacation. She is weak, mercenary, and disgusting. Even her voice is a tiny little timid squeak. It's no wonder William goes elsewhere for sex.

R42, You know it just eats the Harkles alive that they have to bow to a 6-year-old.

Yeah, but at least Kate doesn't look like this.

Kate married one future king and gave birth to another plus 2 spares. She's done her job quite well.

R59 went to one of America's failing public schools. She thinks that IG number actually mean money in the bank. And that ketchup is a vegetable.

I read on Datalounge that Megan will be a special consultant to the Queen, and that if she gets a few more Likes she will go to the Prime Minister's meeting every week, too. Go Meg go! I am crossing my fingers that The Queen chooses Meg and Harry to be on the throne because they would be perfect there. Youth is best!

R75, It's widely known that Her Majesty relies upon Datalounge for advice on matters of state! Obviously Smeg's popularity here will have a great impact. In fact, she might just become the next PM! You heard it here first!

OOH! And remember "likes" and IG followers are absolutely as important as funding the sovereign grant! Yes! Go Smegma, Go!

[quote[Harry insisted on moving and demanded the 3m for renovations.

R54. Harry was not allowed to insist on anything. They wanted him out of KP. The RF decided to bite the bullet and put up with some momentary bad press regarding the $3 million renovation. The RF said, "We'll pay, but you're not staying at KP. It's FrogCott or nothing. We don't care if your wife wanted to live in a palace. When it's rent free, she'll live where we tell her to live."

And Meg INSISTED on not having a royal title for her sprog. Nevermind that their online presence includes a crown and the HRHs. But they INSISTED they wanted Archie to not have his own HRH.

You know - they just want MORE for him than they want for themselves. No hypocrisy whatsoever there.

How dumb is R77? She has yet to work out how to quote.

Square brackets, Mrs Joey Deacon.

[QUOTE] She thinks that IG numbers mean money in the bank.

If MM decides to leave the fusty royals, her IG followers will immediately translate into big bucks for merching and endorsements. So yes, followers = wealth.

[QUOTE] read on Datalounge that Megan will be a special consultant to the Queen, and that if she gets a few more Likes she will go to the Prime Minister's meeting every week, too

Why would she want to participate in any of the above? Beyond tedious. She is here for the foreign tours.

R79, only if people want to follow the merch of a menopausal whore who "used to be married to an HRH, but now is shilling diet products and mom jeans."

Yeah, let's see how that works out.

But good luck to her, as it will mean the British taxpayer will be off the hook! Only those foolish enough to give a shite for an elderly former consort to the 6th-in-line to the throne will be subsiding her lifestyle. It's really all "the tyg" ever wanted anyway right? Celebrity. She's not really built for the family stability that it is inherent to royalty.

R80, Yes, and the move to Frogmore was to facilitate Meghan traveling through the secret tunnels to Windsor Castle where she has become the Queen's most trusted advisor.

R80 - Don't forget hawking the copper tubs! There is so much merching to be done when you are "HRH the Duchess of Griftenstein, who doesn't want a title for her sprog, but still wants to recognized 'round the world as royalty!"

R79, How much do you suppose Her Merching Highness is worth?

[QUOTE] only if people want to follow the merch of a menopausal whore who "used to be married to an HRH, but now is shilling diet products and mom jeans

She will be back to a US 4 in another six months. The cache of being the only biracial woman to be/have been married to the queen's grandson won't ever wear off. She'll be A list for life, while you are here crying into your Shredded Wheat and wondering if you can afford a holiday in Mallorca this year.

The average age for the menopause is 52. Shame your Maths is as bad as your English and your IT skills. She's 15 years away.

Markle reminds me of Barbra singing So Long Dearie when she absolutely insisted that she was not pursuing Horace Vandergeller just as Markle absolutely INSISTED that Archie should not be given a title:

Prince Charles will make Archie an HRH and Duke of Suffolk.

William and the kids.

[quote] She will be back to a US 4 in another six months. Have you seen recent photos of her nose? Her backside? The spread is not only weight-induced, but also physiognomic. Not changes that a bit of fat loss will address. (Also not sure I agree with your assertion that she will be a size 4 in 6 months. Where'd you come up with this? Thin air?)

[quote] The cache of being the only biracial woman to be/have been married to the queen's grandson won't ever wear off. Again, why are you obsessed with her race?

One more time:

It. Is. Not. About. Her. Race.

It. Is. ABOUT. Her. (Poor) Behaviour. And. Actions.

R85, Hasn't she been 37 for the past 3 years? ;)

R87 - Why would he do that? The Sussex's "don't want an HRH for Archie" - remember?

Charles giving Archie an HRH would either A) go against their publicly stated wishes or B) prove that they are liars. Which is it?

R85, Yeah, that could probably translate into being a host on "The View" and merching Weight Watchers. Fergie made that work.

But at least she wouldn't have to curtsy to Queen Catherine. You know that's just going to destroy her.

Haha

[quote]She'll be A list for life

There is no A list. If you tie your prominence to that kind of measure, then there are just people whose fame burns brightest for a period of time. And it never lasts for life. It could, after a fashion, if she had any understanding of the family and position in which she's married, but she thinks she's queen of the A list not a working member of the British royal family and that is why in most ways she will inevitably return to where she came from.

My favorite affectation was when the weeks-old Master Archie had his own calendar on the official royal website - second only to the Queen, above the Duke of Edinburgh. So one can view his royal engagements.

That disappeared with a quickness.

33 years ago today, Andrew married Sarah Ferguson.

Bea’s wedding may have to be in Westminster Abbey. Her younger, less social sister, Eugenie, filled St George’s to capacity, with over two hundred more guests than at the wedding of the Sussex’s only a few months earlier. With her connections in London, New York, LA plus the euro crowd, it could be 1,000 plus guests.

[QUOTE] Yeah, that could probably translate into being a host on "The View" and merching Weight Watchers. Fergie made that work.

Fergie wasn't American, wasn't an actress in a popular series, and she didn't have over 9m IG followers. Nobody had heard of Fergie before Andew. Not the case with Meghan.

[QUOTE] But at least she wouldn't have to curtsy to Queen Catherine. You know that's just going to destroy her.

And here we have the Queen Catherine troll. Replikate probably won't even be called Queen Catherine and if MM wasn't okay with curtseying, she would never have married Harry in the first place. The enmity between those two women is far less than you like to fantasise about. Meghan isn't jealous of a little yacht girl who worked at Jigsaw for about five minutes.

[QUOTE] There is no A list. If you tie your prominence to that kind of measure, then there are just people whose fame burns brightest for a period of time. And it never lasts for life.

Yes, it does. There are many people considered A List until they die, as you know.

R98 - if William becomes King, his wife will become Queen Catherine. That's the way it works.

If you don't have anything truthful to say, please go away. Your stupidity is tedious.

I’m guessing Kate’s top 3 female royal relatives would be: 1. The Queen 2. Camilla 3. Zara Phillips

[quote]Prince Charles will make Archie an HRH and Duke of Suffolk.

Prince Charles CAN'T make Archie Duke of Suffolk as long as Ginger is alive (unless the title reverts to the Crown for whatever reason). The best Archie will get is HRH The Earl of Dumbarton, unless they style the sprog with one of the suspended or in dispute titles or just make one up especially for him. But as R91 posted, styling the sprog anything other than Master Archie goes against the public utterances of Megs and Ginger at least AT PRESENT. What will happen in the coming years is anyone's guess.

[QUOTE] With her connections in London, New York, LA plus the euro crowd, it could be 1,000 plus guests.

She will be asked to scale back on guests rather than be offered WA.

[QUOTE] if William becomes King, his wife will become Queen Catherine. That's the way it works.

So why isn't Phillip King Phillip? And we know Camilla won't ever be Queen Camilla. You need to get over your obsession with 'Catherine' as you so pathetically call her. You sound like a servile, sycophantic little spaz.

Good question [R104]

[QUOTE] if William becomes King, his wife will become Queen Catherine. That's the way it works.

The Queen Mother was known as Elizabeth, Queen Consort, NOT Queen Elizabeth, so you need to stop wanking over your pitiful Queen Catherine fantasies. And the media will still call her Kate.

[QUOTE] Not since Prince Hamlet was pouting around Elsinore has a Danish royal behaved quite as much of a brat, and this, at 83.

Thanks for the hilarious article, R105!

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[R108] Hair and outfit look good Lady Louise

James Viscount Severn is a beautiful looking boy but he has baldness in his genes.

So glad the Photographs Spam Troll has gone.

R104 - my God, you really are too stupid to post here.

Since a King is higher in rank than a Queen, Philip would never be anything but a Prince /Duke of Edinburgh because he can't outrank a Sovereign Queen.

R106 - The Queen Mum was known as Queen Elizabeth when married to King George VI.

I call her Catherine because that's her name. No one calls her Kate in the family. The press has called her Kate since she appeared on the scene so most people call her that name too. However, she will be Queen Catherine not Queen Kate. Is everything fucking straight in your mind now?

Who is the manic arguing that Kate won’t be called Queen Catherine? How is he even arguing that?

Her full style and title will of course be HM The Queen, but of course people will use her name “Catherine”. It would be weird not to.

Archie will eventually get an HRH style by (current) LP which state that male line grandkids of the sovereign (Charles at the time) are princes and get a princely style.

He will be entitled to one when Charles is King, but it's possible he won't be styled that way. Louise and James Wessex are both entitled to HRH and Prince/Princess designations but don't use them.

Speaking of syncophantic, Markle's crap PR continue their stellar work. Whoever dreamed up the Wimbledon empty seat appearance really knows how to make a middle aged fraulein shine.

I feel like half these posts are by some middle aged American woman who read a Wikipedia article on "titles of nobility" and decided to try her newfound "knowledge" out on DL.

From Master Archie (we want privacy and a normal life for our child) to HRH Prince Archie (we're special and deserve to have a title like the Cambridge children). They should make up their minds because it all sounds quite schizophrenic.

R117, they can't have the HRH for Archie until Charles is king. What is so hard to understand about that?

R118 - and I was saying @R117 either he's a private citizen named Archie Mountbatten Windsor or he's His Royal Highness Prince Archie. If they want privacy and a normal life, then they should decline the title like Edward and Sophie did. If they allowed their son to have a title when Charles becomes King, then they would be hypocrites.

Oh no! I am just reading elsewhere on Datalounge that Instagram is rolling out their new hide the likes policy. OMGee whizz what will Meg Markle do?

The Duke and Duchess of Gloucester are a low key couple. The Duke is the Queen's cousin and his wife is Danish. They had a big apartment in Kensington Palace when their three children were growing up but I'm not sure if they're still living there or if they've already moved. They keep a low profile.

A video of Harry meeting with Jane Goodall today.

Harry looking like a slob as usual.

Out with the old, in with the new. There's a new guy at the helm of The Royal Foundation. Swipe for info and photos.

R119, they might want him to have more privacy while he's still a little kid, but if he turns out to be an extrovert who loves the camera (and there's a BIG chance of that) you bet they'll ask Charles to style Archie as a prince.

His ignominy is not set in stone. I know it hurts you. 😂😂😂😂

On holiday at Balmoral, the Queen requests that discs made of her favourite TV programmes are made. In the past, these have include The Bill, Keeping Up Appearances, Midsomer Murders, New Tricks, Last Of The Summer Wine and the complete Doctor Who.

The list of programmes is not the only tradition in place at Balmoral.

Queen Victoria started the tradition of having a bagpiper play under the monarch’s window at 9am for 15 minutes every single morning.

Meanwhile, the current Queen began a tradition of inspecting the sandwiches given to guards according to another castle insider.

Errr, no edit button.

R126, Balmoral sounds deadly dull. Poor Meghan is supposed to be spending her birthday there, too. I'm sure she'd rather be in Sardinia or Capri.

R125 - I hate public figures who want privacy but still feel entitled that someone else (eg. British taxpayer) foots the bill for their home renovations.

I'm not hurt but you sure seem to have a chip on your shoulder, Miss Emoji.

R128 - we don't actually know for sure if Harry, Meghan and Archie will be invited to Balmoral or not. It was just reported but not confirmed. We'll have to wait and see.

The British taxpayer!

[QUOTE] hate public figures who want privacy but still feel entitled that someone else (eg. British taxpayer) foots the bill for their home renovations.

Of course you hate them. It's clear that you are impoverished and barely leave the house, so you're 50 shades of green. But you need to come to terms with the fact that an older Prince Archie might be very visible. Charles only has two sons and he might encourage it.

[QUOTE] we don't actually know for sure if Harry, Meghan and Archie will be invited to Balmoral or not. It was just reported but not confirmed.

Meg will try to get out of it if she can. Why go to chilly Scotland in mozzie season, when she could be sunning herself in the Med?

R132 - I'm neither impoverished and I do get out but my God you're fucking tedious with your insults. Is that all you have in your arsenal? You certainly don't bring any knowledge to these threads. I come here to escape your type of shit. You have no information to provide, no contribution to make so you're blocked, Miss Emoji.

Has Harry even been at Balmoral since he was a kid?

That was Harry and Meghan fishing for an invite, r130. We'll see if it works.

Not as much as others in the family, r135. But you know Meghan wants to be papped going to church with Granny so she can claim that they are besties.

R135 - come to think about it, I don't recall that he's been to Balmoral since his teenage years. Of course, another possibility is that he does go there every summer and we just don't hear or see any photos of him. Charles has his own place called Birkhall on the Balmoral estate and there are other more private lodges on the grounds. Balmoral is a stalking/hunting/fishing/riding/hiking sort of place so I'm not sure it would be Meghan's cup of tea.

^ riding

There's nothing wrong with Archie using his title or being visible. However, it would be silly to make a big deal of styling him Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor, strongly implying that he won't be a working royal one day and can make his own choices, but later on accept the Royal trappings and turn him into HRH Prince Archie. If that's the route they are planning to go, he should have been styled Earl Dumbarton from the beginning.

[QUOTE] You have no information to provide, no contribution to make so you're blocked, Miss Emoji.

And this is how a hot tempered dunderhead reacts when they have no counter argument. Charles has two sons. He will want ALL his grandchildren to be princes and princesses, regardless of what is being said now.

Poor little Archie. So much of his fate left up to those two feckless and selfish idiots. He’ll have no family, his mother having alienated everyone with her antics.

[QUOTE] that's the route they are planning to go, he should have been styled Earl Dumbarton from the beginning.

Nope, they don't want that ugly, meaningless title when Bea and Eugenie (Archie's counterparts in the older generation) are swanning around styled as princesses. They are playing a waiting game, and also waiting to see what kind of child Archie is.

Putting that Meg & Harry loon on ignore results in the disappearance of half of this thread, lol.

R59, stick to frau, fat, flyover state for describing DLers who don't get Meghan's appeal. "Average basic bitch" doesn't do it, as Meg is so very basic (one of the reasons she's so fun). And I guess you must be pretty basic, too, if your metric is IG followers, according to which Selena Gomez is queen of the world?

R143, so you’re saying they don’t want Archie to be a prince because Bea and Eug are princesses?

Titles are absolutely meaningless to HRH The Duchess of Sussex (Occupation: Princess of the United Kingdom).

Meaningless.

[QUOTE] . And I guess you must be pretty basic, too, if your metric is IG followers, according to which Selena Gomez is queen of the world?

It's a universally acknowledged metric, Cecilia...companies will pay per post based on likes. Megs gets over 1m for every post so is setting herself up for a nice merching future.

[QUOTE] [R143], so you’re saying they don’t want Archie to be a prince because Bea and Eug are princesses?

Nope. Archie should be Prince Archie, but I can see why they want to wait a bit til Liz pops her clogs. Then Charles will reward his own.

By that time he might not even have a decision to make. Kate might have another kid. George might marry young, unlikely, but you just never know. There might be no more room for a working royal if the decision is to be his, later on in life.

R147, I know it's a metric for marketing; I was talking about humans. How many followers a person has or how many likes their posts get does not have effect on how I view them.

They're cutting that shit way, way back for good. It's only going to be Willis' kids who get the HRH, and after him. it's only going to be George's kids (sorry Char and Louis-Louis).

R151, so they should have “chosen” to style Master Archie with the best title they could, while it’s still “available” to him.

Regardless of “what kind of child he is” (*guffaws*).

I can’t imagine that HRH the Duchess of Sussex would deprive her child of a title. She uses hers every chance she gets. It’s so ironic that I’m suspicious that the title wasn’t actually up for discussion and it’s sour grapes.

Wouldn’t it be better to let him have the title and reject it if he doesn’t want it, later in life?

That’s like being offered a fully-funded college fund at birth and your parents decline it because hey, you might be really good at sports and get a full scholarship!

The fact that Harry and Meghan declined a title for Archie makes me like them a bit more. I didn't expect them to do that.

R154 - the Queen "declined" to issue a decree to make Archie a Royal Highness and Prince. In a snit, Harry and Meghan decided to say "fuck it" , we won't give him the Dumbarton title either. Not admirable whatever way you look at it.

They 'declined' a title because a title was never on offer in the first place. Deal with it.

[quote] The fact that Harry and Meghan declined a title for Archie makes me like them a bit more. I didn't expect them to do that.

Uh-oh, the fraus aren't going to like this one bit.

Oh the word salad is just too much on the Sussex Royal account. Less is more.

Oh the word salad is just too much on the Sussex Royal account. Less is more.

Sorry for the double post at R158 & R159. DL is stalling again.

Obviously no title was offered. Even MM's is only a courtesy title, she's not got citizenship yet. But she snatched it immediately. Courtesy or not.

The Queen DID offer her a title. Meghan was too modest to accept at this time. She agreed to take the use of Frogmore House instead but I hear that the Queen is intent on convincing Meghan to reconsider this summer at Balmoral.

I'm intrigued by the awkwardness of the lack of title. As the birth approached, I wonder if Harry broached the topic with the Queen. Or maybe he passively aggressively said nothing and just got angrier with each passing day that she didn't issue a decree. Also, they chose a name that isn't very...princely. Prince Archie? Nope. Certainly they could have lived with one of the traditional names that was more regal. They could have named him Arthur but called him Archie as a nickname.

They could've picked a nice name like Anthony, Matthew, Benedict and the like - these are truly unusual names among the BRF, but they are classics and don't sound dumb and pretentious like Archie Harrison.

But being pretentious twats themselves, they chose a pretentious name for their sprog.

I do feel kind of sorry for that kid.

R161 That’s not correct. Markle acquired the style and title of “HRH The Duchess of Sussex” on her latest marriage. Citizenship has nothing to do with it.

Someone keeps stating, erroneously, otherwise, on these threads. It’s just not correct.

[quote] Someone keeps stating, erroneously, otherwise, on these threads. It’s just not correct.

Thank heavens there are diligent posters like yourself to correct the mistake every single time! God BLESS YOU!

Here ya go - for those of you with an interest in the history. "Anne of the Thousand Days" - a great film, and one of my favorites.

Harry has become a buffoon.

This year's birthday photos of the three Cambridge children.

Have any of you actually been to Scotland in the summer? Around 17c/66f average high per day, not much sun, plenty of rain, clouds of mosquitoes. The sea is much too cold to swim in and it is often windy. NOBODY goes there except HM. Places like Corsica, Sardinia, the Amalfi coast, Turkey, and all the Greek islands are only a 3/4 hour plane trip from London. That's where you'll find most royals and celebs.

Louis has such a direct gaze and a face that reminds me of Henry Viii's in its intensity. Even as a baby, he is such an alpha. George looks far more docile. It's a shame that age decides who should be king rather than personality or academic achievement. I think Louis would be FAR more suitable.

Why on earth would Meghan Markle, status seeker and social climber extraordinaire go to all the trouble of, well, everything she’s done up to this point, and then *decline* a royal title?

That makes no sense.

And neither does the explanation offered above: they’re waiting to see what kind of child Archie is. What? Did Diana decide whether simple-minded Harry was suited to be a prince?

Louis is also the only one of the three to have escaped the curse of the Middleton eye bags and the Windsor deep set, beady eyes. His eyes are large.

'Why on earth would Meghan Markle, status seeker and social climber extraordinaire go to all the trouble of, well, everything she’s done up to this point, and then *decline* a royal title?

That makes no sense'

Keep up, Doris, we're not saying she did decline it. We're saying it wasn't offered, but it will be when Charles is king.

R166 if idiots such as yourself and R161 didn’t keep quoting this supposition presented as fact there would be nothing to correct.

It’s a British royalty thread, not an American celebrity thread - the titles actually mean something if you care to learn something new.

'It’s a British royalty thread, not an American celebrity thread - the titles actually mean something if you care to learn something new. '

Get lost, Titles Troll. Nobody wants another heritage lecture from you, you patronising OAP.

r175 could you explain why Meghan is not called Princess Sussex? Thanks

R122 - WOW - Harry is every so bald! He looks like a monk with a tonsure. Hilarious how quickly he lost his hair.

R133 - Because she's a sow? If she can't look good in tailored designer dress, she's only going to look like a farm animal in beachwear.

R141, the way his wife laughs at Smeg and mocks her? Nope. Not looking to promote the agenda of the Duchess of Griftenstein.

Charles only ever cared about Charles. He threw his own sons under the bus. His reign will be short though, and then we can look forward to King William.

R147. Smegma gets exactly nothing for every post. She's on the taxpayer's dime - she's not allowed to double-dip by making money merching.

She's already middle aged and her ass is fat beyond recovery. By the time Harry divorces her she'll be insignificant. Now that she looks like her mother and is almost 40, her sex appeal is as invisible as her as her standing in the eyes of the Princess Royal.

Go away butt-sniffer.

R154 - they didn't decline the title. It was never on offer in the first place. And it's Charles who has made such a point of wanting to pare down the BRF. Charles doesn't want a large BRF. It's not coming from HM, it's coming from Charles. No HRH for Archie - it waters down the brand for the ones who really matter: William and George (and obviously Kate - which is why she gets the tiaras, sashes, royal orders, etc.).

R170 - Of course I've been to Scotland in the summer - and it was paradise! The temperatures were perfect, there was sunlight until quite late. It's no wonder that people with the option to go there (such as Her Majesty, the Queen) have chosen to do so for decades. It's gorgeous and perfect.

R174. Stuff and nonsense. She herself claimed that they declined it. But it was never offered, that was just self-promotion to suggest it was even a possibility.

Charles may or may not offer it. He's not above throwing Harry under the bus, he's done it before. He's made a point of saying the BRF needs to be streamlined, and Meg is just an embarrassment to them all.

R163, Disagree that they could have named him Arthur. That name is so meaningful to the English. It's really inappropriate for a half-American non-titled baby who'll never take the throne. William and Kate could've gotten away with it for their eldest son, but obviously, they went with George instead (which is, of course, legendary and full of positive connotations as well).

Archie Harrison is a foolish sounding name, but since he'll only decline in importance it doesn't really matter that he sounds more like a character from Riverdale than from the BRF.

R171, you're a freak. Seriously.

"Louis has such a direct gaze and a face that reminds me of Henry Viii's in its intensity. Even as a baby, he is such an alpha. George looks far more docile. It's a shame that age decides who should be king rather than personality or academic achievement. I think Louis would be FAR more suitable."

"reminds me of Henry Viii's in its intensity" When do you imagine you met Henry the VIII? How close were you that you could assess his gaze's intensity? Have you met other historical figures? Whom and how often?

R162, not only did Smegma jump at her husband's title, she would spread everything available if it would elevate her further.

She came in as an American thinking that all wives of princes are the same. Despite the fact that it's a much better gig than anything she had in the past (and she is DEFINITELY aging out of pretending to still be sexy - she's already middle aged). Honey, you're 40. How long do you expect to live? Look at your gene pool. You're halfway there!

She's publicly pissy about the fact that nobody worships at her feet. She was somewhat pretty on a Canadian TV show a few years back, and she married the dumb prince. Bully for her, but now we're supposed to kiss her arse? And she's quite flinty about the fact that our collective arse-kissing isn't up to her expectations!

If she and her dimwit husband and their weird-looking child (did you see those pictures? What is UP with the poor thing's eyes?) bugger off to Africa it's best for everyone. (Well, except for the poor Africans of course. They didn't ask for this nonsense.)

[quote] And yet soon her IG will overtake Kate's. MM is adored worldwide. One of the most popular women on the planet. Her failure to snap back to a UK 6 straight after having Archie makes her more endearing to ordinary people who don't judge others by how much they weigh.

OMG. The Sussex IG account may gain more followers than the Kensington Palace Account. And Meghan is definitely not snapping back to her sexy Suits body anytime soon.. What does this all mean for the monarchy?

It's not fucking American Idol. God I wish half the planet had never heard of the Royal Family.

The UK has bigger fish to fry than Meghan and Harry. Like their new PM and Brexit.

Perhaps these foolios are a welcome distraction. Or misdirection.

If they’re not careful, there won’t BE a royal family to worry about titles and tiaras.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Don't forget me - before MM I was the biggest slut out there, trotting out in my lingerie.

I wonder if William turned to Rose just for a chance to play with breast tissue, as poor Kate has the figure of a prepubescent male.

More photos of Kate "the slut" Middleton lounging topless. Imagine the screeching on this thread if MM was photographed doing this.

And don't start the shit of "this was a breach of privacy".

The future Queen of England should not be topless (and of course braying) anywhere, private or public. It is unseemly. Has any other future Queen sat around with her tits hanging out?

And yes, Kate sure looks "cracked out"

R194 is too angry to just be expressing a point of view. Blocked.

Henry Viii. Check his eyes. Louis' eyes.

That seems to be the goal consistent with their behavior, R190. Otherwise known as burning it all to the ground on your way out the door.

Harry banging on about how he has The Lion King memorized was not cute.

Jealous trolls Dim and Duch can fuck right off to LA to be eaten alive by Pimp Mama Kris. Begone!

Do you mean Louis CK, R197?

Because he looks exactly like Louis CK.

[quote]But being pretentious twats themselves, they chose a pretentious name for their sprog.

“Archie Harrison” isn’t pretentious.

It’s total white trash.

Congrats; Meghan, you’re officially white!

R194 Get lost, you annoying cunt.

Markle got her stiff looking tits with enormous nipples out on a PUBLIC beach and FILMED HERSELF. All so she could promote herself on her shitty, shallow blog. And you want to criticise Kate for being photographed by a stranger while she was sunbathing with her husband IN PRIVATE.

Markle twiddled with her tits, licked her lips and virtually fingered herself trying to look sexy for a men’s magazine...and you hate Kate for modelling for students at university and showing underwear?

Kate WORKED on a yacht for a summer... cooking, cleaning and serving drinks. People do that, you know...they get jobs that don’t involve faking blow jobs, stripping to their underwear to wash floors and adopting cum faces while simulating being fucked against filing cabinets.

And, let’s face it...if Markle ever worked on a yacht it would have been flat on her back with her grubby, over-used clunge being offered to whoever was paying enough.

You are desperate and pathetic. Go away.

And will the ignorant twat who keeps calling everyone a troll also piss off. It’s funny that it can’t afford the $2 for an actual account, but I supposed McDonalds doesn’t pay all that much, right?

[quote]Markle twiddled with her tits, licked her lips and virtually fingered herself trying to look sexy for a men’s magazine

I must have been off visiting rellies on Mars because I missed this.

R178 I was just going to note that Harry's hairline is in Friar Tuck territory.

I hope the Cambridge’s have another baby, this time a girl. Princess Susan would be a nice name

Overnight this thread has taken a turn into UNHINGED territory.

Lol, Fergie

R201 made me cackle aloud. Especially “grubby, over-used clunge”.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

The Queen has the ugly task of appointing Boris Johnson prime minister today. Does it get any worse?

R209. Yes. I've thought of that, and it makes me sad.

Her first Prime Minister was Winston bloody Churchill, and now she's appointing that fascist muppet Johnson.

I bet she wishes the Lord would take her now.

Meh, Churchill was no hero no matter how history mythologizes him now.

Thatcher was probably worse for her than Boris. It is understood that she abhorred Thatcher (of course, who wouldn't?).

If fights between the deeply invested Meghan defenders and the deeply invested Kate defenders were broadcast, I'd watch.

Thunderdome! Two duchesses enter, one duchess leaves.

While I think having three kids is more than enough, I'd like Kate and William to have another child. I don't think they'd pick a rather 'modern' name like Susan (mentioned somewhere in this thread). They'd be going for 'regal' names, as is tradition with heirs, heir's children respectively. As far as I know, they would've loved to call George Alexander, but, alas, Alexander wasn't deemed regal enough for a child that is likely to be king one day, so they went for George instead but sticked to Alexander as a middle name.

If they had another child and if that child were a girl, I suspect names like Alice, Alexandra, Victoria, Margaret, Mary to be chosen - names with a certain tradition within the BRF, that is.

*as is tradition with heirs, THE heir's children respectively

R214, I think we would want the Daily Mail to report. "Duchess Kate's trim pins and pert posterior prove no match for stylish Meghan's ample frame, as the crowd watches in horror while the ring is littered with hair extensions and stiletto heels."

Meghan is busy behind the scenes helping the Queen understand and process the change that will happen today. Of course the Queen has been around for a long time and knows how it's done but she doesn't really have a sense of how the people feel anymore. Meghan has stepped into this role of counselor and really wowed even the most skeptical of courtiers.

R218, Yes, the Frogmore tunnels have been even more active than usual. Duchess Meghan is requesting that they be refurbished to her specifications.

Yes R219, she wants them widened to fit her mobility scooter. Her thighs are chafed , walking through them in this heat.

R218 - too stupid to post here. You have NO CLUE.

R218, you're my new favourite.

Thank you, I like you too r222.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Tbf, if this is true (which probably isn't anyway) and if I were Kate and William, I would make sure to keep that toxic grifter bitch away from my children, too.

Meghan Markle was the school bike.

In an all-boys school not even local to her own.

"Who the hell is this guy's hairstylist? He should be fired. I am NOT amused".

I don't know where Sophie is here but I like the colors in the room.

The Royal Windsor Edition of Monopoly.

The Royal Windsor Edition of Monopoly.

^ sorry for the double post @R229 and R230.

Queen Mary sure loved her pearls.

R228 that's at her home, I remember that picture.

More info from Google....Photo taken at Bagshot Park, the Earl and Countess of Wessex’s residence in Surrey. Part of a February 2015 Harper’s Bazaar feature celebrating the Countess of Wessex’s 50th birthday.

From R226: “According to Meghan’s drama director at St Francis, Meghan stayed grounded despite the adulation.”

As ever...

Grounded.

Boris Johnson says the Queen told him "I don't know why anyone would want the job" as she appointed him prime minister. Apparently he breached royal protocol by revealing this.

R236 - PM's meet with the Queen to have frank but PRIVATE discussions on a number of subjects. The subjects of these meetings should never be discussed publicly. That's the rule.

It's clear that Boris Bedhead cannot be trusted. HM will have to be more careful in the future.

Who's that blond guy talking to the old hag? Is he kind?*

*Is he wealthy? I need to get me some filthy rich husband after leaving the dumb ginger.

Poor Queenie....a great gangly donkey schoolgirl of a prime minister with May and now this jackass to deal with.

The UK is as fucked up as the US.

I understand that Carrie Symonds (Boris Johnson's girlfriend) has reached out to Meghan via the palace. She thinks that Meghan can help her develop a personal style that connects with the people. We'll see what happens. I think this partnership could be a good thing for both our countries and also Ireland.

Ah damn, damn, DAMN! Miss Lillibet gonna get all up in dat ass next time, Boris!

'That seems to be the goal consistent with their behavior, [R190]. Otherwise known as burning it all to the ground on your way out the door. '

Hi, Welpy! You're always identifiable by your stock phrases like 'burn it all to the ground on your way out the door.' You used to say the same about Simon Cowell and One Direction when you posted non stop about Larry. It's a phrase which makes very little sense here. If M and H want to leave, they will want to leave on good terms, with income guaranteed.

The Queen is secretly hoping that Boris will drop his current girlfriend and hook up with Bea. She knows Bea is better off living in 10 Downing than some monochrome studio owned by the son of a penniless Italian count. BTW the Count owns no castle or villa in Italy and lives modestly in France now.

No fat shaming, you DL bitches!

Not quite the Little Mermaid, but still cute. There's a lot of Bea to keep skinny Edo warm during winter.

Bea should try out Tess Holiday's swimsuit line. Very flattering for curvy women.

Bea looks horrendous. Like a 46 yr old who's had four children. And trolls here criticise Meg's figure!

Bea down for the count. She is the quintessential British "good time girl". No wonder the Queen adores her.

She's no beauty - but she has captured the heart of the son of a penniless Italian count. Better pedigree than sis's husband, a brand boy for Mr. Amal's tequila.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

And now... for some fun...

just hover over the image...

DL tribute...

A vision in...purple. Say yes to this dress, Dlers?

How could Dave Clark ever leave her for that tall blonde woman....

OK I'm stopping... but it's a fun account...

Bea - such equine features. Did Fergie fuck a horse, rather than Randy to produce Bea?

Bea has lost weight, and has gotten rather fit. She ran the London Marathon. How many of us fat whores (DL, so please forgive) could do that?

Who wouldn't jump on Edoardo's dick? If you're going to be ruined, do it in style.

Ah, Edo's modest lair that he is preparing for Bea and Wolfie to co-exist.

No free apartment at any palace for Bea and Edo - and his bastard son, - says Prince Charles.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

For the time being he may be referred to as Hapless Harry, but by 2021 he might as well be referred to as Hairless Harry.

Well, that's what he gets for taking the piss out of his balding brother.

[quote] Later he will meet academics and students at Sheffield Hallam University.

Harry, of all people, at university, of all places - LOL, you can't make this stuff up.

I wonder how Madam will insert herself into her Insta post of his day?

Because you know she will.

Harry's features are too rodent like to suit baldness - he's going to have to go the awful toupee route.

Oh dear ....

Anybody who think he's Hewitt's leftovers need only look at that nose. That's Charles, right there.

That mop of red hair used to be his asset. Without it, he'll just look like some old geezer.

From the Royal Sussex IG account:

“His Royal Highness, the Duke of Sussex, visited Sheffield Children’s Hospital this morning. His Royal Highness’s wife, Her Royal Highness, the Duchess of Sussex, has inspired His Royal Highness in his interest in children since giving birth to His Royal Highness’s son, the future His Royal Highness, Prince Archie. Her Royal Highness, the Duchess of Sussex, has always adored children. She used to be one herself, and she took the opportunity of childhood to engage in feminist campaigns, inspiring other children worldwide. Her Royal Highness, the Duchess of Sussex, is also adored by every child she encounters including Geoff, Caroline and Leo, His and Her Royal Highnesses niece and nephews. EDIT: George, Charlotte and Louis.

LOL... in the opening sentences of that I thought it was legitimate.

R270, hahahaha, brilliant, thx for the laugh!

Harry resembles Charles facially and VERY much resembles Phillip facially. It's the ruddy Spencer coloring that throws people off.

Wow.

I'd LOVE to be a Royal Spider who has super-spider hearing so I could hide in hide the corner when Booris Johnson reports to QEII. Of course, now that he's blabbed about her remark, I suppose it'll just be his voice, and then hers saying, "Thank You." and then out the door he goes.

And then I'll be crushed under the Royal pump QEII is wearing...

Her Majesty should beat Boris up with her handbag every single time she will have to waste her time with this fuckwit.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I see the balding scruff has got that grey jacket on again. Ok, he may have a few, but why wear them when they look so unkempt?

Shows you how much Edward Lane Fox must have had to look after the manchild.

Swipe for Meghan's outfits - before and after her marriage.

Andrew and Sarah during their engagement. I never thought she would make a good "royal bride".

Gifts for Archie.

Why do we want to look at Meghan’s outfits?

Why do we want to look at Meghan’s outfits?

Meghan with her mother on her Northwestern graduation day.

R282 - because some on this thread like fashion and would be interested to see Meghan's style change. Is that so hard to understand? If you're not interested in a certain subject and/or photos, just scroll by. Is that so difficult to do?

It's hard to believe.

The royal men when they all had lots of hair.

R285 But you post endless photos, selected by you, with no reference to anything much except a royal connection. Difficult to “scroll past” your dozens of fucking pictures. This is a gossip thread.

Oooooooh look....a 40 year old photo of royal men.

Ffs.

R288 & R289 - so what do you have to contribute other than your annoying whine? Post some gossip then.

When the royals are on vacation, what the fuck do you expect?

Has Phil escaped again?

In all seriousness, I hope the young teen makes as much of a recovery as she can from her injuries.

"When the mania over Diana was at its height, one of the Queen’s courtiers said, ‘Ma’am, you will never have seen anything like the publicity Charles and Diana are having’.

"‘You were not around,’ she said witheringly, ‘when Margaret and I were having our future husbands talent-spotted for us’."

"alas, Alexander wasn't deemed regal enough for a child that is likely to be king one day"

Odd. My parents were never given that advice.

When royals visit NHS hospitals it always looks like all staff and patients are really happy. Of course department managers and selected staff/ patients smile for photos. Having worked for nearly 40 years in various ( mainly paediatric ) hospitals, this is not the case. Of the many royal and celebrity visits I have been around, the one that provoked the most anger was Diana's. She had come to unveil a plaque at a new unit that had been open 6 months. All the new flooring in that area was ripped up and replaced...because Princess feet?? Staff were enraged. but the usual sycophants went to shake hands/grin.

R281, you know Meghan will take one look at that blanket, sneer, and have the nanny burn it.

It's Tiara Time...The Queen doesn't wear this diamond and ruby tiara as often as some others.

Queen Alexandra in all her finery.

Alexandra was quite a beauty.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Pah.links not working, but she met Richard O'Sullivan

Any chance we could see a pic of your hearthrob with his feet out of the grave?

R293, I was talking about British kings. In other monarchies, obviously, Alexander used to be regarded as a very regal name.

And let's not forget about, say, Ingrid-Alexandra who is likely to become queen of Norway one day (she's the eldest child of crown prince Haakon).

R282 is the disgusting Scat Troll, F and F and block.

R302.I was trying to find a series of pics.but all I found was child or thirty plus.Here is his TIYL.

Charles and Camilla will be visiting New Zealand in November. So the Sussex pair will be in Africa and the Cambridges will tour Pakistan.

I can’t believe it. Things have really died down in this thread—even though it’s not behind a paywall.

Megs is only about 4 months pregnant in those retirement home pics.

She’s about the same size my sister was the day before she gave birth. Same size baby as Archie, too.

How is that possible? Is Megs really such a secret fattie? I did not see that coming.

I think it was more dodgy calling the heir William. Lest we forget the crimes of William of Orange. Yes we have had a Hanovarian since but still.

Let's face it, there aren't that many 'regal BRF names. Too many former kings' names are tainted.

No way Charles will be known as Charles III ... I think he'll be another King George.

George is even one of his middle names - a VERY convenient coincidence when it comes to his monarch name.

r310. respectfully I disagree. I think if the Queen had died years ago then he may have gone that route. Now .as an old man he will stay Charles. It would seem silly to the public in this day and age.

r310. I meant to add that Charlie boy sees himself as a bit of a god, so maybe he likes the idea of the martyr King Charles . Forget the hedonist one. but oops that may be more like him.

Yup, R311, the public have known him as Charles for more than seventy years now. Starting to go by George (or any of his other middle names) would just seem weird. Actually, I think people will just continue to refer to him as Prince Charles out of habit for a while. It'll be odd to adjust to him being King, his face appearing on currency, stamps, etc.

R310 of course choosing a regnal name differing from the one he's has been known his entire life would be downright odd. But that's what might happen. We're talking about royalty and dynastical stuff after all, and picking a regnal name different from the one you initially got isn't that extraordinary.

Funny anecdote: Upon her father's death, Her Majesty was asked what regnal name she was thinking of using, to which she sort of indignantly replied she'd still be known as Elizabeth.

Harry may be rodent-like Cousin Bea is a human woodchuck.

Beauties and the Beast.

r313, Currency will be strange. GeorgeVI was still on the 10p for a long time. When we went to new money a two shilling coin became a ten pence piece.They hung around longer than other coins.

Will a right Royal edict be issued upon accession?

"I declare before you all that the King, formerly known as Prince Charles, will never speak to the press again in the tradition of our late Queen of happy memory. Now kindly fuck off!"

Nope, not a secret Meg is a fattie --look at the high school and college pics. She is built like her father, barrel chest, no waist, flat ass. To be thin she literally has to starve herself with drugs and cigs.

Fat or skinny she is still ugly and a shitty person.

[QUOTE] I think he'll be known as King George.

What kind of spaz are you? Charles II isn't hated. He will definitely be Charles III.

Had the name Charles had any stigma attached to it, TQ would never have named her eldest that in the first place.

Some people find her attractive I guess. I agree about the phony, shitty interior aspect.

So, I've only seen the trailer. Has anyone actually seen King Charles III? I think it would be a wild ride. I've always been partial to my fellow Scorpio (Charles).

That movie is eerily prescient, R324. Harry gets involved with a black activist.

R325 It is super eerily prescient. The playwright completely saw the future. At least as far as Harry’s love life.

In other news, I may soon be getting my wish to have Edo join the cast!

I dearly hope they make it in time for the next season of the Windsors, though I'm sure he'll appear anyway, even as her goofy, sleazy boyfriend. But a goofy, sleazy fiance would be gold.

I think the little Italian is cute and rather elegant.

I saw the play of Charles III and DL-ers should prepare for the fact that William and Kate (she in particular) are basically cast as the Macbeths, for no reason founded in reality but only because it works for the plot. The play ruminates over some interesting political ideas, though.

The most prescient show of all time about the BRF was Evita. First staged a few years before anyone ever heard of Lady Diana, the funeral that opens it is pretty much an exact replica of hers (and Che's commentary very probably an echo of the Queen's thoughts at the time). It's spooky. Rainbow High and High Flying Adored are pretty prescient of her too, though I accept they equally apply to Eva (and that High Flying Adored probably also applies equally to Rice and Lloyd Webber themselves).

Where have all the troll trolls gone?

Long time passing

Where have all the troll trolls gone

Long time ago.

Where have all the troll trolls gone?

Banned by Muriel every one.

When will they ever learn?

When will they ever learn?

Charles in that film is like Henry Viii, dissolving parliament, and gentle, diffident Kate as Lady Macbeth is implausible too.

England is doomed to hundreds of years of aged monarchs, it seems.

[quote] although I accept they equally apply to Eva

Er...it was written about Eva, who had almost nothing in common with Diana except that they were both blond (although Eva dyed her hair), died young & produced hysteria when they died.

The entire thrust of Evita is watching a woman scramble & sleep her way to the top, manipulate a man who was in thrall to her & then find the view from the top isn’t very pretty.

Rainbow High is about a concerted PR drive to win hearts and minds by glamming up. High Flying Adored is about the dangers of wanting fame and then achieving it.

I’ll grant you that the opening funeral scenes & attendant hysteria is reminiscent of Diana’s death - but that’s more about mass hysteria of crowds rather than the woman herself.

Other than that, Evita is not even faintly prescient with regards to Diana.. As quite a few of us have remarked before, it’s far more applicable to Markle.

Kate Middleton’s guide to Bali

R333 Ha! I thought you’d taken leave of your senses until I started watching that. Uncanny!

[R33] That is amazing, where did you find that??!!

[R333] I mean

Yes, the "Evita" funeral and "High Flying Adored" applies to Diana, but the rest is Meghan Markle to a tee. "Evita" fans will appreciate the resonance of so many lyrics:

"I'm amazed, for I'm only an actress......It seems crazy but you must believe....there's nothing calculated, nothing planned....I'd be surprisingly good for you."

"I came from the people....they need to adore me....so Christian Dior me!"

"The actress hasn't learned the lines they'd like to hear...."

"There you are, I told you so....makes no difference where we go.....the whole world over, just the same.....you should have heard them call our name! And who would underestimate the actress now?"

"But Señora Peron, it's an easy mistake....I'm still called an admiral, yet I gave up the sea long ago...."

Someday the clueless fraus will learn how to post on DL.

[quote] Someday the clueless fraus will learn how to post on DL.

Or even better, they will fuck off to a site where their rambling posts are welcome.

R308, it’s not that she’s so fat, but she’s cramming herself into clothing that’s too small. She’s lucky that her face, arms and lower legs remain thin (her swollen face was temporary), so she only has to worry about fitting her midsection. A sleeveless shift dress should be her best friend.

No, she's a tub. If you think she is not, based on her Wimbledon pleated skirt apoearance, then you are too.

I went to Holyrood Palace today and they had Meghan's wedding outfit on display (plus a replica of Harry's suit). The embroidery of Meghan's veil looks gorgeous up close, as does Queen Mary's tiara. The dress itself, though, somehow looks even plainer in person than it does in photos. I still can't understand why, of all the dresses she could have worn, she picked that one.

They also had George's page boy suit and Charlotte's bridesmaid dress. I hadn't noticed before but George's suit had "GC" embroidered on the shoulders in gold (presumably for "George of Cambridge"). If you're going to be in Edinburgh and you fancy seeing them, they're on display until October. There's audio commentary from Harry and Meghan as well.

I go to every costume show I can, but that's one to miss -- Markle's poorly fitted dress that was out of step with the huge virgin veil. I bet it fits the mannequin much better than the only technically alive person.

They're all going vegans! Except the Queen, she clubs birds.

Young Wolfie will make the perfect ring bearer for Edo and Bea.

He is a beautiful little boy.

Wolfie will make such an adorable ring bearer.

He is a gorgeous child.

The audio commentary is optional though, right?

[quote]HARRY and Meghan’s neighbours have been warned by royal flunkies not to talk to the couple or ask to see baby Archie. They must even avoid stroking the pair’s dogs should they bound over.

[quote]A top British plastic surgeon claims the Duchess of Cambridge uses Botox, hints she is a client and has displayed alleged “before and after” photos of the royal to promote the procedure. Dr. Munir Somji, of the Dr. Medi Spa Clinic in the London cosmetic surgery capital of Harley Street, posted the images on his Instagram account, which have since been deleted.

[quote]In a statement to the New York Post, a spokesman for Kensington Palace says that the Dr. Medi Spa post is “categorically not true” and “in addition, The Royal Family never endorse commercial activity.”

Meghan is so fat she's interfering with the radar at Heathrow. She shows up as an unidentified blob on the radar. I expect she'll stick to the tunnels more in the future.

Yep Kate looks all tox'ed up, frozen face. She needs some fat transfer under her eyes - hopefully that is the next thing she will have done.

It's going to be fun to see her face transform into plasticine over the next decade. Poor dear needs to preserve her looks before hubby finds another "turnip toff" to fool around with.

Funny how Meghan couldn’t find any empowering females to profile who didn’t have any associations with entertainment/ fashion industry or “activist” IG influencers who pose more frequently in designer outfits or swimwear than documenting hands-on activism. How hard is it to find women who work tirelessly for worthy initiatives or organizations and who aren’t constantly promoting themselves on IG? Not very difficult at all unless you’re a famewhoring duchess who’s seeking solace in/ hide amongst similar-minded women.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Damn, Jan does not hold back.

You have to wonder how a woman, whose jarring demands for privacy make the ultra-secretive Bilderberg group look like a desperate boy band, can suddenly disport herself across a magazine and a website that is read and devoured by millions.

R352 Do you understand the world of magazine publishing? Vogue wants to SELL copies of their magazine.

I am sure there are kind old souls in your neighborhood who volunteer for Meals on Wheels or reading to the blind, etc. BUT VOGUE READERS ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THOSE PEOPLE.

Meghan is featuring people that Vogue selected TO SELL ISSUES.

I hope you understand now . You seem rather out of it regarding the world of magazine publishing.

We have seen this before.

They did just get all that Disney money in a donation for a foundation not yet operating.

Any fiction that the BRF would have any control going forward due to purse strings is doubtful. Funny how the Clinton PR person she hired is an officer of the foundation.

The love Harry claims to have for the story of The Lion King, even having much of it memorized, is telling, no?

They did just get all that Disney money in a donation for a foundation not yet operating.

Any fiction that the BRF would have any control going forward due to purse strings is doubtful. Funny how the Clinton PR person she hired is an officer of the foundation.

The love Harry claims to have for the story of The Lion King, even having much of it memorized, is telling, no?

Must be genetic.

We have seen this before.

Disney money, r358? Where'd you read that?

We have definitely seen this before.

Proves Harry is Charles' son, doesn't it.

R33, or 3-hundred and something, I don't know, these fucking threads are wack, anyway, the photos of Charles and Cam at the Royal Welsh Show are fun. Thanks for posting them. That horse statue made out of discarded horseshoes is beautiful. Seriously, I love it.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

She included Laverne Cox in the Women in Vogue, who was surprised?

She is just awful.

And such a cliche.

As they distance themselves more and more from the BRF, I wonder if celeb interest will wane?

They were fools to let her in but Liz has always been completely ineffectual with family drama.

The Rules?

She checks EVERY box of LA trash.

R364, Laverne Cox actually had the nerve to criticise black women for refusing to have sex with men who date trans "women". He said that this is stigmatising and directly leads to the murder of trans "women" (by men). He actually blames male violence on a woman's right to refuse sex. And Meghan has named him a trailblazing woman! For fuck's sake. In fairness, she probably didn't compile the list herself, but still - it wouldn't have killed her to do a bit of research before okaying the choices.

She really does not care. Going to do what she wants, no intention of letting anybody check her.

It'll get to the point where Harry will be afraid to leave, even if he wants to. He'd be accused of....well, things.

R104 that isn’t the way things work when a Queen is the monarch in her own right. There are two kinds of Queen - Regnant and Consort. The word ‘Queen’ has in its origin, a very old word for ‘wife’. Thus a Queen was always inferior to a King, and many monarchies, including the Japanese, do not allow for a Queen Regnant. When Victoria became Queen of England, she was not entitled to be ‘Queen’ of Hanover as well, because of the Salic Law which disallowed a woman to hold the title ‘King of Hanover’ - a title which the previous Hanover Kings of England had held. I’m not sure what will happen with the new Act which allows for absolute primogeniture over male preference, but it would be more in keeping if future consorts were just Prince or Princess. The only Prince Consort in British history was Albert, and Philip of Spain, the husband of Mary 1 was declared King of Naples by his father, so that he could be known as ‘King Philip’.

The Harry Styles/Spazz troll started Part 88 earlier today. Just when you think he could not be more annoying...he tries to circumvent our webby. Anyway, the discussion there is well over 100 posts.

What annoys me most about their insta account is that nearly every post has the word "special". A special issue (of the magazine), special event, special visit, special day, special moment. Get a fucking thesaurus.

No posts in a whole week! Why was this thread abandoned? In the past, we'd have filled up two whole threads in a week's time.

I think there are only ever 7-8 people posting in these threads. So, when the main crazies leave or get banned (e.g. the guy who repeatedly writes the same long posts insulting MM, or the guy who scours British tabloids for articles) things drastically slow down. Hopefully folks are enjoying the outdoors.

Edit:

Nevermind. All the usual posters are over in the “MM editing...” thread.

There's been a BRF part 88 thread up for a while, R372.