Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Quick Summary of the Mueller Report

1. Although Mueller notes 140 Trump-associated colleagues meeting with Russia and Wikileaks, there's not enough direct evidence to say the campaign worked with Russia to collude. Instead, they knew what each other was doing and knew each would benefit.

2. Mueller decided not to look into Obstruction of Justice actions for fear that he would find evidence of a crime. He followed the Dept of Justice directive that a sitting president cannot be indicted so didn't look closer.

3. Russia worked directly to influence the election through false information peddling and trying to hack election systems.

by Anonymousreply 5April 23, 2019 8:29 PM

The report details all his obstruction without calling it obstruction. He must not get away scot free.

by Anonymousreply 1April 23, 2019 7:54 PM

And Miss Lindzey is daring Democrats to try impeach DJT rather than express dismay about the report's content. Catch her on on Sean Hannity nightly. I don't watch that network though.

by Anonymousreply 2April 23, 2019 7:59 PM

OP your summary sucks, What R1 says. Not only is obstruction thoroughly investigated and documented, it specifically explains which laws are broken and how they are broken.

by Anonymousreply 3April 23, 2019 8:08 PM

OP....you have to be a troll. Mueller did not find CONSPIRACY (he only looked at whether Trump and Co helped with the hacking by the IRA and GRU) because the people in Trumps camp LIED CONTINUOUSLY AND DESTROYED EVIDENCE. There is a difference. Whats missing from the public narrative is that all the people who lied and destroyed evidence should be charged with obstruction and aiding and abetting.

by Anonymousreply 4April 23, 2019 8:17 PM

[quote]Whats missing from the public narrative is that all the people who lied and destroyed evidence should be charged with obstruction and aiding and abetting.

But first, charge the Democrats: Obama, Hillary, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Huma Abedin. All have destroyed evidence and colluded with Russia and other foreign governments.

by Anonymousreply 5April 23, 2019 8:29 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!