Future POTUS and First Man’s Nipples
|by Anonymous||reply 50||Last Monday at 6:49 PM|
Gross, what’s next? VPLs? Why can’t they wear bras?
|by Anonymous||reply 1||04/09/2019|
I didn't know the husband was so fat.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||04/09/2019|
Poor Chasten is about five years from lookng exactly like Rudy Giuliani does at 74.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||04/09/2019|
These two are not going to end up in the White House so it's really a non-issue.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||04/09/2019|
There is a out and proud homosexual president of Ireland now. No DL interest because she is fug!
|by Anonymous||reply 5||04/09/2019|
One thing I cannot stand in the 21st century is how men have taken to carrying, in their front pants pockets giant rectangular devices. It ruins the look of an outift.
Your pants don't sit properly and I find the outlines completely distracting.
I know it's just a fact of modern life, but I hate the look.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||04/09/2019|
|by Anonymous||reply 7||04/09/2019|
Could these two hit the gym before being in public?
|by Anonymous||reply 8||04/09/2019|
I think the Democratic leadership's strategy is to flood the playing field with lots of 'types', hoping Turd will open his big hole and start personally attacking with slurs. There's so many he won't know who to attack first.
And Biden is not running. He's just out there to bring attention to the Pussygrabber-in-Chief.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||04/09/2019|
|by Anonymous||reply 10||04/09/2019|
|by Anonymous||reply 11||04/09/2019|
And don't fucking tuck the polo into the pants!
|by Anonymous||reply 12||04/09/2019|
It's not a look, R6. Don't be so fucking shallow.
They are busy. They put things in their pockets. That's why pants have them.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||04/09/2019|
Neither nice nor cute, but ugly. Pity Buttigieg (like most of the rest of the Dem candidates) has no problem sharing a platform with bigots.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||04/09/2019|
I think they're cute, and I 'd suck either of their nipples, only by request.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||04/09/2019|
I see Chasten has been maximizing their Kohl's Cash rewards.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||04/09/2019|
Chasten needs a gym and a makeover.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||04/09/2019|
[quote]Chasten needs a gym and a makeover.
Not if they want to win. It is the fact that they look like typical mid-westerners and not coastal A-Gays that is there appeal to swing votes. They are both doing everything exactly right. If they get a makeover, they will lose their authenticity and be seen as creating a fake persona.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||04/09/2019|
First Bottom needs to start working out.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||04/09/2019|
|by Anonymous||reply 20||04/09/2019|
[quote]that is there appeal to swing votes.
That is their appeal to swing voters.
Christ over an hour and no bitchy comments? You guys are slipping.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||04/09/2019|
I'd be tempted to vote D if he were on the ticket.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||04/09/2019|
Of all the potential first spouses, he will have the nicest tits!
|by Anonymous||reply 23||04/09/2019|
He will never win. Perhaps, if all the voters were Yankees but a gay boy will never win the south.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||04/09/2019|
Chewy McNip for VP!
|by Anonymous||reply 25||04/09/2019|
[quote]a gay boy will never win the south.
Time will tell. The problem is going to be the black vote.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||04/09/2019|
Just remember that the old people who actually vote are voting based on guns and abortions.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||04/09/2019|
I would like him to modernize his hair cut a bit - looks a little like Mr Bean....
|by Anonymous||reply 28||04/09/2019|
Anyone who actually believes this is completely disconnected from reality
|by Anonymous||reply 29||04/09/2019|
They look adorable. Real kind of cuteness. Not like those plastic, tweezed, gym rat, spray tanned coastal gays who, for me, are dick shrinkers.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||04/09/2019|
They look like an average middle American couple except the Mrs is a Mr. Nothing wrong with that - I wish Pete well.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||04/09/2019|
68% of Americans are perfectly willing to vote for a gay man as President - recent survey (I forget who conducted it). This "he could never win because of the South" stuff is nonsense - the South doesn't decide our elections, the Midwest does.
And those two really are the ultimate in schlubby Midwesterners. The key word is "relatable."
|by Anonymous||reply 32||04/09/2019|
R13. I'm not being shallow... I did not criticize either man in the photo. Yes we have pockets... we have them in the back as well. I was referring to the "look" when the pockets in the front are packed with what looks like a brick.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||04/09/2019|
Yeah, the phones and wallets in front pockets look chunky in today's tighter fashion.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||04/09/2019|
R33 - yes, you are right - it ruins "the drape" of the trouser
|by Anonymous||reply 35||04/09/2019|
If he wins the Democratic primaries Trump will put Lindsey Graham on his ticket as VP to get the gay votes.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||04/12/2019|
We want to see the droopy tits of Harris, Warren, and Klobuchar!!!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 37||04/12/2019|
Yes they're cute teddy bears. I wonder if they fuck.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||04/12/2019|
Guys, let's not pick on Pete. He's smart, focused, and with a bit of strategy, can actually win.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||04/12/2019|
You vant nippels? Here be best nippels!
|by Anonymous||reply 40||04/12/2019|
Pete said today he can’t get behind identity politics - which are the very reason he’s able to be married.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||04/12/2019|
But, I'm sure he can get behind proper grammar, R41.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||04/12/2019|
Pete is amazingly short-sighted about a lot of things related to the gay community. And why wouldn't he be? He only came out a few years ago.
On gay issues, he is absolutely a follower. Not a leader.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||04/12/2019|
Good. it will be nice to see a gay man publicly not fall for all the trans and non-binary bullshit.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||04/12/2019|
Hillary could have been our first non-binary president. I sincerely believe if she had been elected she would have come out as queer.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||Last Monday at 12:07 PM|
[quote]Pete said today he can’t get behind identity politics - which are the very reason he’s able to be married.
The civil rights movement is the reason he was able to get married, not identity politics. There's a difference.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||Last Monday at 12:12 PM|
Yikes, looks like some major tinymeat. Not sure if it's a good idea to put The Button into those hands. Better just to get a nice big truck to compensate.
|by Anonymous||reply 47||Last Monday at 12:15 PM|
R46 is right. The two are very different. The civil rights movement is based on universal principles and the rule of law. It was an interpretation of the Constitution that got us gay married. Intersectionality combined with identity politics is basically Marxism, it is divisive and will ultimately be rejected. It may also set us back as gay people. It is already hurting women. They are different intellectual traditions.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||Last Monday at 12:15 PM|
Is that you, Jason Johnson at R14?
|by Anonymous||reply 49||Last Monday at 12:27 PM|
I wonder if Chasten C. McNips is on DL. He should see all the love for them. The trolls don't count.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||Last Monday at 6:49 PM|