Has Badly Has Jussie Smollett Screwed Over Kamala Harris and Corey Booker?

*How

I googled "Kamala Harris Jussie Smollet." The top ten results are from three days ago from august media institutions such as: The Daily Caller, The Washington Times, Fox News, Breitbart and Youtube.

FF troll thread.

TROLLING, TROLLING, TROLLING.

Not badly, but it will give the media fodder. I just watched Allison Camerota lambast Kamala over being a ;lawyer who didn't wait for the facts. So, it's a fodder issue that might be conflated. If anything it will aide Harris b/c she'll think more before she speaks.

This really needs its own post, even with the existing 26 Smollett threads? You seem desperate, OP.

CNN was just discussing this.

Not as badly as Kamala is going to screw over racist homophobic scum like OP when she becomes President.

Kamala is a former AG and prosecutor and it’s seen as even worse than what Booker did.

The FBI will address the Harris-Booker connection in their comments at 8:00PM tonight.

How does what Jussie did have to do with them? Everyone, including Trump, condemned the attack and said how horrible it was. Because it was the right and compassionate thing to do. To not do that, would seem heartless.

Say Lady Gaga said she was raped. Of course everyone would support her and say how horrible it was because that’s the human thing to do. If later Gaga said “Just kidding, I wasn’t raped” that doesn’t mean all the people who supported her now look bad and have to apologize. It just means they were fooled too.

[quote]I googled "Kamala Harris Jussie Smollet." The top ten results are from three days ago from august media institutions such as: The Daily Caller, The Washington Times, Fox News, Breitbart and Youtube.

WTF are you talking about??! Nice try.

The Independent.

It’s not Brietfart. It’s very fucking media outlet.

[quote] that doesn’t mean all the people who supported her now look bad and have to apologize. It just means they were fooled too.

Agree. No one knew all the facts. You can make fun of them for speaking out in the first place I suppose but it's not a major stand in the long run..

The facts changed.

Homophobic and racist suspicion of ALL hate crimes is not what gays want to see in an elected official. I'm glad she made her comments when she did because that's what it looked like at the time.

Fuck off, Nazi troll.

And make no mistake, this is all an attempt to discredit all past and future hate crimes committed by the right. This will be used against the gay and black community for at least another 5 or 10 years. ... Except from people like Kamala, who is squarely in our corner.

The only people who would negatively judge Harris or Booker for the benefit of the doubt they extended are bigots who never planned on voting for them in the first place. Neither one of their presidential ambitions is over, sorry Oleg.

I think this is exactly why we need a white male nominee. I really would like it to be Harris but we need white voters to switch over. Lots will see this, again, as they are quick to jump when ever a white man is accused of anything. White men are evil. This will not help turn people, especially white women who will vote to protect their families. Their comments seem minor but the Republicans are great at spinning these things and keeping them alive.

And the Dems never fight back.

R16 You're why this country and 3 million more voters are sick of white male nominees.

Why is OP grayed out and has strikethrough text?

Yes bitches I remember seeing an explanation before but couldn’t find it in help.

R9, I’m developing a crush on you.

Harris, Booker (and a host of other dems) gave a gay black man the benefit of the doubt when he said he'd been hate crimed

R16: Guess this proves why whites should always be on top!

R18 and you're why we are going to lose this election again. You have to wake up. As we learned, having the most votes means nothing. You have to turn lots of Trump voters. I don't like the idea but we need a white male. We are in disaster mode. How much longer do you thing RBG is going to last. Do you really want 3 Trump appointees on the Court. We have to win and I'm sorry but winning over white voters is how it will get done.

[quote]Harris, Booker (and a host of other dems) gave a gay black man the benefit of the doubt when he said he'd been hate crimed

So did Donald Trump.

R22 Simply being white and male isn't a qualification. I know this will come as a shock to you.

An even better logical conclusion to your "let's make sure it's a white guy to win over racist voters that vote based on the color of someone's skin" thesis would be to make dems nominate ANOTHER RACIST that rivals Trump! Problem solved! You're either an idiot or the worst undercover Republican I've ever seen.

"We have to fight Trump's racism by making sure the democratic nominee is a white man that will woo racist voters! It makes perfect sense!"

You can all live in your denial of the truth but reality is reality. Simply crying racist does not address real issues. The narrative has been set, whether real or not. Democrats are against white people. You want to win you need to change that narrative.

[quote]Not as badly as Kamala is going to screw over racist homophobic scum like OP when she becomes President.