Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Eldergays, please tell me about the hysteria for Pretty Woman when it released in 1990.

The movie grossed 464 million dollars at the box office in 1990. When adjusted for inflation, it's approximately 920 million today which is absolutely nuts for a romantic comedy. And it's an R-rated movie. My God !! What was happening then ?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 91February 22, 2019 3:23 PM

Don't understand it myself. It was a movie about a prostitute, not a fucking fairy princess. No one in their right mind would have encouraged the Richard Gere character to have an open, committed relationship with a hooker he picked up off the street, no matter what she looked like.

And yes, I am aware high-class escorts have had long-term relationships with clients before.

by Anonymousreply 1February 19, 2019 2:06 AM

I cant even describe the mayhem in the streets. Standing in line at the theater was like being in thw crowd at Diana's funeral, Op. People waited in.line for days.

by Anonymousreply 2February 19, 2019 2:07 AM

My sister was a model in NYC at the time. She had long, red curly hair for real, unlike Roberts' which was just for the movie. She was also tall and thin and had presence. She said that when she would wear big sunglasses around town, she would be mobbed by people thinking she was Julia Roberts.

by Anonymousreply 3February 19, 2019 2:12 AM

It was Julia. Regardless of how she’s perceived today, this was when she became a movie star. She just had ‘it’.

by Anonymousreply 4February 19, 2019 2:12 AM

What's more inexplicable is how Go West's career was resuscitated for a minute.

by Anonymousreply 5February 19, 2019 2:13 AM

The movie was trash. Klute was a far better movie about “love” with a hooker.

by Anonymousreply 6February 19, 2019 2:14 AM

That and Ghost were runaway hits that year, and they both kind of sucked.

by Anonymousreply 7February 19, 2019 2:16 AM

Julia was the golden girl, the silver screen goddess that gay male audiences had been clamoring for, pining for, needing since Dunaway and Streisand at their mid-70s prime. And her movie was a reflection of our collective fantasy... and a need for love.

The glamour, the style, the infectious humor, the knowing intelligence Julia brought to the screen--it was camp, it was DIVA, it was heartbreak all at once. Julia galvanized the gays like nobody's business, and PW became an instant staple in the G&L canon!

by Anonymousreply 8February 19, 2019 2:17 AM

Hmmm Julia Roberts was on her first run as a hoe and hadn't yet slept with another client, hence she wasn't really a hoe and that excused it all for the movie's fans.

by Anonymousreply 9February 19, 2019 2:18 AM

People love a rags to riches story. The shopping spree, clothes and subsequent takedown of the snooty store bitch were all part of it. The funny thing to me is, how many trust fund sluts who dressed like Vivian when she starts out would visit those same stores every day, and the help would hardly kick them out. They would be great customers, as would all the cheap side pieces in town.

by Anonymousreply 10February 19, 2019 2:19 AM

[quote]And yes, I am aware high-class escorts have had long-term relationships with clients before.

Da, but vee vill see jus how "long-term" eet ees

by Anonymousreply 11February 19, 2019 2:19 AM

R8, you write really well, are you Andrew Holleran?

by Anonymousreply 12February 19, 2019 2:19 AM

bump

by Anonymousreply 13February 19, 2019 2:37 AM

I got to go to a screening of it on the Disney lot when it was still a "rough cut" and titled "2000." I don't know if I've ever seen the finished final print.

by Anonymousreply 14February 19, 2019 2:46 AM

R7, it could've been a great year for Molly Ringwald if she hadn't turned down both Pretty Woman and Ghost. I guess Betsy's Wedding looked more appealing on the page.

by Anonymousreply 15February 19, 2019 2:57 AM

It is weird to look back and recall what a huge phenomenon this movie was. I admit I really liked it at the time but when I've caught bits of it in recent years it doesn't hold up for me. Julia was charming in it and the Cinderella/fairy tale aspect was certainly a huge factor in its popularity. It was a chick flick but the hooker fantasy kept straight guys from tuning out. Very impressive that Garry Marshall made prostitution palatable to the movie going masses.

by Anonymousreply 16February 19, 2019 3:07 AM

In the original ending, she realized her life promised with the Richard Gere character was an empty materialistic sham and she threw herself off a tall building; but it tested poorly with audiences.

by Anonymousreply 17February 19, 2019 3:11 AM

Wasn't that also the original ending for Betsy's Wedding?

by Anonymousreply 18February 19, 2019 3:15 AM

Lmao!!!!

Everyone here has done their job in describing the Why. She had “it” at a time when there was a large void, together they had incredible chemistry, men loved that she was a whore, but her whoring hadn’t actually been consummated, the Cinderella angle. I would say all of these aspects reigned quite equally.

by Anonymousreply 19February 19, 2019 3:16 AM

I don't even remember it.

by Anonymousreply 20February 19, 2019 3:17 AM

This was a dramatic reenactment of the hysteria many of us felt about going to see the film for the first time, OP.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21February 19, 2019 3:18 AM

okay

by Anonymousreply 22February 19, 2019 4:31 AM

Eldergays? I still think of it as a recent movie. Which, I guess, makes me an eldergay.

by Anonymousreply 23February 19, 2019 4:34 AM

It closed the New York Stock Exchange.​

Shut down the schools in Indonesia.​

In Florence, Italy, a woman leapt from the Duomo clutching a picture of Julia Roberts and cursing her name—

by Anonymousreply 24February 19, 2019 4:38 AM

I'll never forget the hysteria for Little Women when it was published in 1868.

by Anonymousreply 25February 19, 2019 4:40 AM

Those March sisters! So shockingly modern in their attitudes and behavior!

by Anonymousreply 26February 19, 2019 4:46 AM

Christopher Columbus! What richness!

by Anonymousreply 27February 19, 2019 4:51 AM

Boulmiche! What richness!

by Anonymousreply 28February 19, 2019 4:54 AM

Have never understood the appeal of Julia Roberts. I can think of at least 10 other leading ladies of the 90s who I preferred.

by Anonymousreply 29February 19, 2019 4:55 AM

Julia Roberts' star power was evident in "Mystic Pizza" (1988). Richard Gere did Cotton Club in 1984, Officer & a Gentleman in 1982. I would say that his career had cooled off by the time Pretty Woman came out.

Like R16 said, it was a Cinderella fantasy story. Not sure if it was a "hooker with a heart of gold" story. Maybe it was kind of like "My Fair Lady." Basically, it reinforced hopes in young women that you could be poor, sexy, and uneducated and still meet a good-looking, nice-ish, rich man who would actually consider you to be marriage material.

by Anonymousreply 30February 19, 2019 5:22 AM

bump

by Anonymousreply 31February 19, 2019 8:39 AM

I saw it once and thought it was pretty appalling. Nowadays it should be in a vault next to Song of The South.

by Anonymousreply 32February 19, 2019 9:35 AM

IIRC, she wasn't some virgin whore on her first nighttime stroll. That seems to be the idea some here are perpetuating.

by Anonymousreply 33February 19, 2019 1:39 PM

I blinded myself immediately after seeing it as I knew I would never see a work of art so beautiful ever again.

by Anonymousreply 34February 19, 2019 1:42 PM

R4 and R19 pretty well nailed it.

It was about Roberts' charisma and looks, and the Cinderella fantasy. It was also about the comeback of Richard Gere, who in his time away from the A list had become a silver fox. He had just had his first hit in ages with Internal Affairs, then this - and around the same time he was also having his very public relationship with Cindy Crawford. It was a confluence of a bunch of things - but mostly, it was about Julia. She was never as charismatic or appealing again, but in that movie she absolutely had IT.

by Anonymousreply 35February 19, 2019 1:54 PM

[quote]I saw it once and thought it was pretty appalling. Nowadays it should be in a vault next to Song of The South.

And yet the musical version is currently running on Broadway.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 36February 19, 2019 2:03 PM

Ghost would have worked with Ringwald. Pretty Woman would have tanked.

by Anonymousreply 37February 19, 2019 4:26 PM

I never got her appeal. She has a “Simpson” mouth. Upper lip hangs over the lower one and drooping hound eyes.

by Anonymousreply 38February 19, 2019 5:31 PM

It must have tested really well. Kind of like Speed tested really well.

When the test scores are good, there will be celebrating going on.

by Anonymousreply 39February 19, 2019 5:36 PM

Every 13 year old girl likes the thought of Daddy buying her all the expensive clothes she wants.

by Anonymousreply 40February 19, 2019 5:39 PM

I saw this in the theater when it came out. The most memorable line came from my date sitting next to me. After Julie Roberts is transformed into respectability, she turned to me and said "She's still quite HO-ISH!" haha

by Anonymousreply 41February 19, 2019 5:55 PM

It wasn’t the best movie, but Roberts had charisma in spades and her peculiar good looks were a change of pace from the typical generic starlet. I have to admit that I was totally impressed with her makeover, especially when she wore the red gown to the opera.

by Anonymousreply 42February 19, 2019 6:02 PM

I preferred the Ken Russell corrective, "Whore" starring Theresa Russell

by Anonymousreply 43February 19, 2019 6:15 PM

I can't believe this is going to be 30 years ago. It really does seem like only yesterday.

by Anonymousreply 44February 19, 2019 6:24 PM

This movie has dated. In today's PC climate it doesn't stand the test of time. Not many movies do I guess. Feminists hate this film with the heat of a million suns.

by Anonymousreply 45February 19, 2019 6:26 PM

Julia Roberts became HUGE with thus Movie

She was on more magazine covers in 1990 than any other celebrity except Madonna that year

They both dominated 1990

by Anonymousreply 46February 19, 2019 6:35 PM

1990 feels so far away now. I was 12. It's like another era.

by Anonymousreply 47February 19, 2019 6:40 PM

I was 12 when the movie came out, too! All of my female cousins were obsessed with this movie. I remember then singing that stupid Roxette song over and over.

by Anonymousreply 48February 19, 2019 6:44 PM

I was a teen in 1990. My mother and I were downtown (we never went downtown...) and were at a movie theater (we never went to the movies....) and she said “We are NOT watching a movie about a hooker!” so we saw Kenneth Brannagh in Henry V instead.

Thanks, Mom!

by Anonymousreply 49February 19, 2019 6:45 PM

The Roxette song is lovely.

The Go West song is terrible.

by Anonymousreply 50February 19, 2019 6:46 PM

Roberts was fine but the role isn’t too difficult.

“Edward” is the tough role because he has to be a hard-ass businessman who gets slowly charmed into being a romantic softie. Gere did a great job.

by Anonymousreply 51February 19, 2019 6:49 PM

There really aren't many entertaining romantic movies, or romantic comedies, so when one has some entertaining qualities, it is a big hit. Plus Julia Roberts.

(I never watched it.)

by Anonymousreply 52February 19, 2019 7:17 PM

That Roxette song sucked, with her whining voice. Natalie Cole's song was much better and should have been a bigger hit.

by Anonymousreply 53February 19, 2019 7:21 PM

R53, you have terrible taste in music

by Anonymousreply 54February 19, 2019 11:45 PM

Just because

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 55February 20, 2019 1:05 PM

It's utter nonsense--that movie....but it made Julia Roberts a star. She was the last real star....very little to do with talent, everything to do with star power, which she had and still has. Now, we have...Brie Larson? You've got to be kidding.

by Anonymousreply 56February 20, 2019 1:25 PM

It was popular, but it wasn't all that and a bag of chips.

by Anonymousreply 57February 20, 2019 1:26 PM

OP - i dont know where you got your numbers, but different sources on the web say that Pretty Woman made 178 million, not 400 million. It was the 4th highest grossing film of the year, had 4 weeks as number one -which is hardly the WOW event you think it was - I remember no such phenomena.

by Anonymousreply 58February 20, 2019 3:20 PM

Domestic: $178 million Foreign: $285 million WORLD: $463 million

America is not the world!

by Anonymousreply 59February 20, 2019 3:38 PM

Hysterical? Are you kidding? I cried for a week when I read how much it grossed.

by Anonymousreply 60February 20, 2019 3:43 PM

And let's not forget--the change of title to "Pretty Woman" was a stroke of genius.

by Anonymousreply 61February 20, 2019 5:02 PM

Laura San Giacomo had a good line when her character tells Roberts’ that she “cleans up nice”, but otherwise I thought it was a bad film. Some irritating touches, like when Gere’s character accuses accuses Roberts’ of using drug, yet she’s actually flossing her teeth. The story overall was cloying and just stupid.

by Anonymousreply 62February 20, 2019 5:14 PM

R56 I'd argue Will Smith was the last real star. He was able to consistently open movies...for a period of 10+ years, his movies dominated the box office every summer.

by Anonymousreply 63February 20, 2019 5:19 PM

Its strange when people criticize something for not being something that it was never meant to be.

It’s kike criticizing a potato because it isn’t an automobile.

Exactly what did you expect to get from a Cinderella story directed by Garry Marshall?

by Anonymousreply 64February 20, 2019 5:26 PM

It's not that hard to understand. All straight sex is transactional, so women enjoy seeing a woman like them get a hot, rich guy.

by Anonymousreply 65February 20, 2019 5:29 PM

The script can was called 3000 originally and Madonna was offered the part, she even met with Garry Marshall to discuss the role and her possibly doing it according to Marshall himself in his autobiography

Madonna turned it down.

by Anonymousreply 66February 20, 2019 6:04 PM

Everybody wants a whore in bed...but they want to meet them on their first day of work. Stupid fantasy.

by Anonymousreply 67February 20, 2019 6:14 PM

This film was released at the height of the "femi-nazi" political correctness. Despite the entire film being clueless to Camille Paglia's rise, it's a well-crafted film. Julia Roberts was NOT yet a star. This film made her into one. Her on-screen performance was so strong that feminists reluctantly enjoyed it. But the film is trash. Especially that ending.

by Anonymousreply 68February 20, 2019 6:17 PM

[quote]Madonna turned it down.

And did [italic]Dick Tracy[/italic] instead where she performed a Sondheim song that won him an Oscar. This still made more money.

by Anonymousreply 69February 20, 2019 6:26 PM

My partner took me to see Pretty Woman on my 70th birthday back in 1990. I adore Richard Gere. This was a great film and despite Mystic Pizza being Julia’s break out role, this film turned her into a movie star.

by Anonymousreply 70February 20, 2019 6:30 PM

[quote]I saw it once and thought it was pretty appalling. Nowadays it should be in a vault next to Song of The South.

I’d rather watch [italic]Song Of the South[/italic].

by Anonymousreply 71February 20, 2019 6:32 PM

Darren Star came in his pants since he knew 8 years later he would make a fortune by ripping it off as a TV show.

by Anonymousreply 72February 20, 2019 6:33 PM

Julia is a Scorpio, the sex sign, so it worked well for her playing a prostitute.

by Anonymousreply 73February 20, 2019 7:34 PM

a stinking heap of dreck that's worse now than it was then

by Anonymousreply 74February 20, 2019 8:02 PM

r70 so u r 98 now ?

by Anonymousreply 75February 21, 2019 4:29 AM

Garbage movie, a total fantasy and not even a GOOD or interesting fantasy. I could never watch the film from beginning to end.

The client looked like Richard Gere in his prime, instead of H. Weinstein.

Also, I never got JR as a MOVIE STAR, never, ever appealed to me ever (neither did Nicole Kidman).

Big brother Eric, got the looks and talent and the charisma in that family, IMO.

by Anonymousreply 76February 21, 2019 5:15 AM

How hot was Gere in "Internal Affairs"?

All of the leading in "Internal Affairs", including Garcia and Baldwin were at their peak hotness. Internal Affairs is as dated as Pretty Women but the male leads are so drool-worthy still worth watching.

by Anonymousreply 77February 21, 2019 5:15 AM

OP should look up histeria in the dictionary.

by Anonymousreply 78February 21, 2019 6:05 AM

[quote] It’s kike criticizing a potato because it isn’t an automobile.

Let's not be anti-Semitic.

by Anonymousreply 79February 21, 2019 6:26 AM

I was a kid (10 yoa). My mother's friends loved this movie and gushed about it non-stop. They would recite some line that she said so I googled it: "Edward Lewis: I think you are a very bright, very special woman. Vivian: The bad stuff is easier to believe." I suppose that the sappy, vulnerable elements appealed to many women. The prince charming crap did as well. All of the men of course went crazy over Julia's looks. Her character was strikingly different than many of the sex symbols around that time - far taller, red hair vs. bleach blond or dark brunette, "innocently" self-conscious (if you could use that verbiage), etc. It seemed as if all of Robert's individually "odd" features seemed to come together into a very stunning whole and suddenly she was more popular than Demi Moore and on more magazine covers than Madonna. It was an era when the unique was glorified (Winona Ryder for example). If memory serves, most of her follow-up films were duds at the box office in comparison to Pretty Woman, but her super-star die had already been cast. Again, I was a few years too young to really speak of what was happening in pop culture then - these are just the memories that stood out.

by Anonymousreply 80February 21, 2019 7:16 AM

R80 Julia was SECOND to Madonna, who turned down the role in Pretty Woman, for person on the most magazine covers in 1990

by Anonymousreply 81February 21, 2019 10:18 AM

That makes sense, R81. Madonna was more deserving for sure. But Roberts was suddenly everywhere.

by Anonymousreply 82February 21, 2019 10:20 AM

[Quote] OP should look up histeria in the dictionary.

Oh the irony

by Anonymousreply 83February 21, 2019 11:09 AM

Julia was the pre Jennifer Lopez. She and her look were the latino light for the early 90’s. Mainstream was hesitant to put a Latina in a feature role.

by Anonymousreply 84February 21, 2019 11:22 AM

She was never as beautiful or as feminine as her brother

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 85February 21, 2019 11:25 AM

Why was it a hit? Great chemistry between Roberts and Gere, impossible Cinderella love story, glamorous fashion, great music, and the notion that all your dreams can come true.

It’s certainly not one of the greatest movies of all times, but it’s different from your typical romantic movie. Julia Roberts has always had the “it” factor and I still enjoy seeing her on screen.

by Anonymousreply 86February 21, 2019 12:48 PM

[Quote] Mainstream was hesitant to put a Latina in a feature role.

They still are.

by Anonymousreply 87February 22, 2019 11:33 AM

Are they?

by Anonymousreply 88February 22, 2019 1:41 PM

Fairy tale about a fairy (Gere) paying for sex with a lesbo (Roberts).

by Anonymousreply 89February 22, 2019 2:18 PM

They stuck me with Katherine fucking Heigl.

by Anonymousreply 90February 22, 2019 3:19 PM

R84 Lopez has the charisma of a bag of rocks

by Anonymousreply 91February 22, 2019 3:23 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!