The Bryan Singer Timeline: a History of Allegations and Defenses, from Troubled Films to Sexual Assault Claims

When will be the Esquire article out? Because I really doubt something will happen to him. He needs to die. A painful death on top of that.

An Open Secret claims to be involved with that article. Given the company they've kept in the past year (Enty, Cernovich, Alex Jones, etc.), you think they actually have anything on him? They notably deleted their tweets accusing Charlie Sheen when someone attacked them and claimed they never accused him.

I’m curious as to why they’d go to Esquire for a major news story. It’s a fashion magazine! Does Hoffman not know what credibility is?

R3, Esquire has done some really great articles over the years

Where are all the old Singer posts at DL? They were loaded with info, pics of him and young boys, pics of his pool parties. Someone please post the link. Get a headstart on Esquire!

Singer is Untouchable. Accept it. He will never be arrested.

To be honest, there is not rotund evidence, unpopular opinion I know, meh, I don't give a fuck this speculation

Rotund? Oh, dear.

I was a fan of Amy Berg and Gabe Hoffman when An Open Secret came out. I've followed them on twitter and all. Unfortunately they are as right wing as you can get I was very disappointed. After they did an award winning documentary on pedophilia in the Catholic church I though they were progressive types. Gabe Hoffman is a loser with a blatant jealousy of Elon Musk, it's pathetic. Most blind itens from Crazy Days and Nights on Musk are fabrications of his envious ego. He also dismisses other victims who come forward as conspiracy theory if it doesn't fit his agenda. True asshole.

Huh. The Esquire article dropped and there is no Bryan Singer article.

What? There's an article but no article?

[quote]I’m curious as to why they’d go to Esquire for a major news story. It’s a fashion magazine! Does Hoffman not know what credibility is?

Do you not know Esquire was also a literary journal for much of its early history? It published Hemingway and Fitzgerald long before The New Yorker did. Much like Vanity Fair, it continues to mix the highbrow with the declasse, albeit not as much as in the past.

R11 The issue of Esquire dropped and there's no article on Bryan Singer.

I remember last November when I was visiting a friend in LA, who works in TV production as well as her husband, the dinner conversation turned at one point to the Kevin Spacey scandal since it was relatively fresh at the time and, obviously, a hot topic over there. She said that she was surprised Bryan Singer's habits didn't get dragged out into the open. I know we had talked about him and his penchant for very young guys on DL for ages but I was surprised as to how matter of factly she was about it, while her husband just chuckled.

I'm surprised at this point as well, given that even with the network he likely has behind him, getting fired from a film, losing a studio contract and banned from press events for said film is a pretty serious knock against him. And this is all without An Open Secret doing anything, so it's kind of a wonder as to whether the Esquire article was just a threat they made or not.

Wasn't the plan for it to come out online just before BR opened? That gives it tomorrow and Thursday. I assumes the timing would be close to the film's opening.

And for Singer to pitch a public hissy about it two weeks ago tells me it's real. I'm sure the tip-off for him re its imminent publication is when Esquire contacted him for comment/rebuttal, as any reputable publication will do

[quote]I'm sure the tip-off for him re its imminent publication is when Esquire contacted him for comment/rebuttal, as any reputable publication will do

Or maybe when DL first started talking about it months ago.

But if they wanted to really affect his career, wouldn't it have been more sensible to publish the article at least two weeks prior? By publishing it right when the movie comes out, people will have bought tickets and it will be too late to really change the direction of it.

It's meant to hurt box office weekend, I get it. To ride the wave of this crappy movie (it's a mediocre film).

But if they published it earlier than release, then they really could've done some damage, because no one would want to buy tickets then and it would surely bomb without the crappy reviews.

Oh crap, it looks like the film is apparently going to do decent business. I guess people really don't care enough that Singer's a pedo. This is why the article should have come out earlier. Singer's going to walk away with some money in royalties.

Gabe Hoffman is a major sociopath, but his dislike for Singer sounded real. Maybe he is a shill meant to control opposition since his main hobby on twitter these days is to invest hours into discrediting people who come forward with their own stories of child sex abuse. Maybe he announced all that just to incite a response and see how interest people would be and then Singer bought the magazine and it was all orchestrated.

Singer is a sociopath who needs to go down, but Hoffman isn't the best person to go forward with this investigation since he only wants it to be told as he sees fit and not in truth.

It's on track to open well

He's very youthful looking. He can't be more than 38? Peter Pan syndrome doesn't make you a pedophile.

He's actually in his 50s

He looks great! Not sexy but attractive enough to fuck for a part.

He was cute a few years ago but now his face looks weird and puffy (Booze bloat? Too many fillers?)

It made 18 million on Friday alone. It's a hit.

So is the hit piece really happening or what? Was it a ploy from Singer himself, because he did write that Instagram post anticipating the inevitable. What happened? I'm curious as to why won't Ronan Farrow touch this subject matter after Harvey?

Im surprised others in Singers circle have managed to skirt the problem as well............ie particularly roland emmerick. Also, I suspect David Geffen liked them young but probably never under legal consent age. For a billionaire, Geffen hung out with a pretty questionable crowd in the years past.

Fox has Disney money now. And Disney is not going to let any pedo news affect any box office. Mucho mouse experience in that department.

Any updates?!

He is SO gross and makes me embarrassed to be gay....like beaming straight-acceptable queens like Rob Marshall and Ryan Murphy.

Why compare Rob Marshall and Ryan Murphy to him? Those guys aren't sexual predators.

Well near a month and the supposed expose still hasn't come and Singer's had a huge hit with Bohemian Rhapsody - must've paid off Esquire to withdraw it.

I wonder if he threatened Esquire with a lawsuit and they backed down....

R34 but singer believes himself to be bi. Its aint our problem, the bi's can have this disgusting sack of shit.

At this point one has to wonder given his dirty laundry is easy to look up and Wikipedia material if he's just going to be another Woody Allen and Roman Polanski - one who always has their disgusting shit brought up, but continue to make films.