I thought this was the best in the Elm Street franchise. Lots of great special effects, especially the girl and the television. I loved the original, but thought this one was the most entertaining. What did the rest of you think?
A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors
|by Anonymous||reply 81||Last Tuesday at 6:06 AM|
Is this the one where the one chick g Debbie?) gets turned into a cockaroach?
|by Anonymous||reply 1||10/09/2018|
I like part 3. My favorite after the original.
R1 No, that's part 4.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||10/09/2018|
This was Patricia Arquette's very first film.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||10/09/2018|
Is this the gay one?
|by Anonymous||reply 4||10/09/2018|
It's the best of the series for me - it brings something new to the series, sets up the rules (the first two are all over the place with this), and sets up the formula that the rest of the series will copy. Good special effects for the year too, and Freddy is still quite mean and less of a cartoon.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||10/09/2018|
The first one was scary, but the rest sucked.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||10/09/2018|
I liked this one the best, too.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||10/09/2018|
I agree that this sequel was the most entertaining ... but I will always lament the transition of Freddy from purely terrifying villain into comedic virtuoso. And this is the episode that started all that.
So I have mixed feelings on this topic.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||10/09/2018|
Part 3 is technically the best of the series after the first. I love this movie so much and Rodney Eastman was my first crush although Laurence Fishburn was so sexy in this.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||10/09/2018|
I loved this movie but I have never forgiven it for killing Nancy and in such as bitch of a way.
It fits Freddy and is suitably cheap and evil but I hated it as a kid and I hate now.
I think part of it is that she was more than a”final girl”. She was a truly kick ass hero in the first film and she defeated Freddy absolutely. Then she comes back to help these new kids and gets skewered by Freddy impersonating her father whom he had just killed. I think that’s part of what makes me hate it so much. It’s SUCH a dick move, coming there and pretending to be her dad and apologetically telling her he is dead and saying goodbye, going for a last hug and kiss from dad to daughter and WHAM! It’s such a sucker punch.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||10/09/2018|
I loved it too but thought it was out of character for Nancy to believe that really was her dad.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||10/09/2018|
I loved the Dream Warriors theme song by Dokken.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||10/09/2018|
Its a classic horror movie.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||10/09/2018|
I remember being so excited to see this one when it came out and then being so disappointed when I saw it. I hated all the elaborate death set pieces, which were cartoonish and not scary. All the added backstory to Freddy Krueger demystified the character and he just wasn't scary anymore (I would say the same for sequel mythologies in the Halloween and Friday the 13th series as well.) Add in a milquetoast lead actor (Craig Wasson) and a painfully awkward performance by Heather Langenkamp and it just helped cement my general dislike of movie sequels.
And r10 brings up a great point. To have such a cruel twist come after all the other cartoon violence and one-liners was a huge tonal shift and didn't feel earned.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||10/09/2018|
[quote] a painfully awkward performance by Heather Langenkamp
If you thought she was bad in this, you should see her in the one where she plays herself.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||10/09/2018|
LOL, r15. So true but by that time my expecations for the sequels were so low that I found her wooden line readings weirdly charming.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||10/09/2018|
She was so gorgeous then
|by Anonymous||reply 17||10/09/2018|
REDUNDANT THREAD THIEF STRIKES AGAIN!
|by Anonymous||reply 18||10/09/2018|
Yes, it's the best Elm Street ever because Wes Craven had a hand in the story and script, plus teenagers got to fight back with their fantasy powers.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||10/09/2018|
You're thinking of Part 2:
|by Anonymous||reply 20||10/09/2018|
And also our discussion here:
|by Anonymous||reply 21||10/09/2018|
Second best after the original. The nurse with those incredible tits made the movie for me. I wish my tits were as fucking awesome as that perfect pair of sexy tatas.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||10/09/2018|
Freddy always cracked wise.
In the first Nightmare on Elm Street, he taunted Nancy and friends with lines like, "THIS is God!" "No running in the hallway!" or "I'm your boyfriend now!" while trying to French-kiss Nancy through a telephone. Freddy cackled A LOT.
In Elm Street 2, he was at his most serious apart from New Nightmare. But he still made time for puns like, "You've got the body and I've got the brains!" while peeling his skull back to reveal his literal brains.
I, for one, don't mind some jokes from Freddy. And I think Dream Warriors found the right balance between humor from Freddy without upending the horrific tension.
It's when the majority of the tone is wacky comedy that the franchise turns to shit, like Freddy's Dead / part 6.
Or when the story and the horror is lame, anyway, so it doesn't deliver on its main job and jokes just make it worse (like Elm Streets 4,5 or Freddy Vs. Jason).
|by Anonymous||reply 23||10/09/2018|
[quote]All the added backstory to Freddy Krueger demystified the character and he just wasn't scary anymore
This is what I liked about it the most. It was still mindless killing but at least he had a motivation even before the parents on Elm Street murdered him. As someone else mentioned, I also loved the fact that the characters now had rules to follow and you could actually beat him if you followed the rules. I still pretend "New Nightmare" was canon and that Heather/Nancy is alive somewhere because I hated her death in Dream Warriors.
And so what if there were threads in 2016 and 2013. Who the hell would bump a thread from actual years ago?
|by Anonymous||reply 24||10/09/2018|
Nancy's death is GOOD for all the reasons you state, r10.
Shit doesn't always go according to plan and I respect franchises that have the balls to kill off beloved characters -- LIKE LIFE DOES.
P.S., It's just a fantasy movie and they can bring back Nancy any time. Like they did in Part 7.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||10/09/2018|
r14 says Nancy's death "didn't feel earned."
Lots of real people's deaths "aren't earned" but we lose them anyway.
It's a surprise and a shock. That's good for movies rather than a predictable, fairy tale ending to everything.
And her death wasn't a "tonal shift," either. It was a horror movie where several beloved characters died before her. Duh.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||10/09/2018|
[quote]If you thought she was bad in this, you should see her in the one where she plays herself.
Even playing herself was too much of a stretch for Heather's acting skills.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||10/09/2018|
I liked that fourth one better.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||10/09/2018|
Ooh well thanks for the education R25 I’m pleased you’re here to tell us why our opinions are wrong and yours are right.
ANOES 3 IS a fantasy and some of us think fantasies don’t need to mimic reality with “shit happens, that’s life” shock bummers.
As you said a LOT of characters died before Nancy so it’s not like the movie needed to veer away from the relentless positivity it had been spewing for the first hour and a half.
Not to mention that killing the heroine from a previous film had been done at that point already so it wasn’t exactly groundbreaking either.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||10/09/2018|
R15 I find it really hard to believe Langenkamp beat out Courtney Cox, Demi Moore and Jennifer Grey for the Nancy role, how??!
|by Anonymous||reply 30||10/09/2018|
|by Anonymous||reply 31||10/10/2018|
Aside from the first being the best, I actually liked Part 2 better than 3.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||10/10/2018|
TNT is having a marathon of the first 3 films this Thursday night starting at 9pm.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||10/10/2018|
R32 me too, it was ahead of it’s time with a gay bottom teen as the heroine of a horror movie.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||10/10/2018|
Nightmare 1 introduced Freddy, but Nightmare 3 MADE Freddy!!
|by Anonymous||reply 35||10/10/2018|
Wes Craven has said that he picked Langenkamp because of her "girl next door" quality and he didn't want an actress who was "too pretty"for Nancy, r30.
I can see how that would eliminate Moore and Cox. And maybe Jennifer Grey is too ugly.
i liked Langenkamp in the role; I don't see her as a terrible actress.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||10/10/2018|
Langenkamp was great in the original. You really care about her and want her to live and be safe. She had that same flash of brilliance in New Nightmare, as well.
One of the main reasons I don't love Dream Warriors like everyone else is because she comes across as so sedated in it. There is no life to her character.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||10/10/2018|
Isn’t Nancy supposed to be on some massive dose of sedatives or something though?
|by Anonymous||reply 38||10/10/2018|
|by Anonymous||reply 39||10/10/2018|
R38, she takes a Dream suppressant called Hypnocil.
Actually, in number 3, (which I saw before number 1), I thought Nancy came across like some children’s Sunday School teacher.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||10/10/2018|
Nancy was a therapist in Dream Warriors. She didn't take Hypnocil herself -- she prescribed it for the kids.
Freddy wasn't invading her dreams, either. Kristen had to pull Nancy into dreams that Freddy was haunting.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||10/10/2018|
R25 shut the fuck up. You are a knee jerk contrarian and therefore nothing you say can be taken seriously. Which is why you’re failing at your job and in life.
The lines you cited from the first Elm Street were not Freddy cracking wise. Not one single line that you cited was written for the express purpose of making the audience laugh. That’s the difference.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||10/10/2018|
She was on Hypnocil because craig picked up her prescription vile and noticed the name then “Looked it up on his computer(internet)?!
|by Anonymous||reply 43||10/10/2018|
I thought Langenkamp was fine. I thought all the teens were well cast. Amanda Wyss was particularly good.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||10/10/2018|
Not one single line you have written suggests you know what you're talking about.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||10/11/2018|
r43, the line is "dream deprivation is nothing to fool around with."
|by Anonymous||reply 46||10/11/2018|
Thank you R46. Its been awhile.
|by Anonymous||reply 47||10/11/2018|
Sorry, not TNT tonight... The first 3 films are airing on the Paramount Network channel.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||10/11/2018|
The forth movie had fantastic effects for the time, but the story is weak and it doesn't hold up. Same with 3, although it does have a stronger story. The original looks so cheap now, and not in a good way. Halloween was probably even cheaper but it doesn't effect the quality at all. I enjoyed the series in the 80s but now I wouldn't care if I never saw one of the movies again, and I probably won't.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||10/11/2018|
Part 4 was a carbon copy of part 3, and riddled with plot holes.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||10/11/2018|
But filled with super hot guys
|by Anonymous||reply 51||10/11/2018|
R51 just what I was thinking part 3 just did not have much eye candy. nancy’s cop father Is probably the hottest one in part 3 :/ Part 1 had johnny depp in his absolute prime and Tina’s hot dumb latino boyfriend.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||10/11/2018|
Nick Corri (now acting under his real name Jsu Garcia) was very hot. Hotter than Depp then and especially now. He later admitted he was high on heroin during the filming of the first NOES.
|by Anonymous||reply 53||10/11/2018|
R53 If you are a bottom you would pick Garcia for sure but tops would probably pick depp ( back in 1984)
|by Anonymous||reply 54||10/11/2018|
Watching he first one right now Langenkamp’s giant cystic pimple on her forehead is so distracting. Love the part where she looks in the mirror after not sleeping for days and says god I look 20 years old.
|by Anonymous||reply 55||10/11/2018|
So much NEW NIGHTMARE hate in here - I think it's wonderful. You can see where Craven's head was at and how Csream was right around the corner. The last act gets pretty goofy but I think it's pretty scary up until the exploding head thing
|by Anonymous||reply 56||10/11/2018|
[quote]Watching he first one right now Langenkamp’s giant cystic pimple on her forehead is so distracting. [bold]Love the part where she looks in the mirror after not sleeping for days and says god I look 20 years old.[/bold]
I vaguely remember that it was older than 20. Regardless, whatever the number, the in-joke was that that was Heather's real age when she made the film.
|by Anonymous||reply 57||10/11/2018|
At least number 3 had twink Joey!
|by Anonymous||reply 58||10/11/2018|
I beg to differ with r52. Rodney Eastman as Joey is one of the primary reasons I am a gay man today.
|by Anonymous||reply 59||10/12/2018|
The grey streak in Langenkamp’s hair in this movie, what the fuck was that about?
|by Anonymous||reply 60||10/12/2018|
It was the result of the high stress that Freddy put Nancy through.
Nancy acquired the grey streak of hair in the first movie after waking up from a stressful dream where Freddy was trying to kill her. It showed that Freddy's fearmongering took an extreme physical toll -- it could turn Nancy's hair white overnight.
That's where the "Oh, God! I look 20 years old" line comes in.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||10/12/2018|
There were some very hot guys throughout this series, but definitely more of them in Part 4 than any other installment.
|by Anonymous||reply 62||10/12/2018|
|by Anonymous||reply 63||10/12/2018|
And Danny. I really liked that the punk kid and the football jock were good friends in 4, a refreshing change.
|by Anonymous||reply 64||10/12/2018|
Danny was hot but I was never into Rick.
I'd take the comic book nerd/ skater before Rick. Plus, I heard the actor who plays Rick is a stalking psycho in real life.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||10/12/2018|
One of my favourite Freddy lines.
|by Anonymous||reply 66||10/12/2018|
R61, that line happens before her hair turns grey.
Also, her grey streak is on the opposite side in 3.
|by Anonymous||reply 67||10/12/2018|
The 4th seemed like a “pop” horror movie with its green hues and primary colors. The 3rd was red tinged, darker and more frightening. The new Kristen was somewhat distracting because Patricia was a great screamer.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||10/12/2018|
A bunch of the sta from Part 3 are going to be at Hyaena Gallery in Burbank this weekend. It's free if anyone is interested in meeting them.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||10/12/2018|
|by Anonymous||reply 70||10/12/2018|
I liked Penelope Sudrow as Iola Boylan’s neice Bernice.
|by Anonymous||reply 71||10/12/2018|
Those nurse's tits were superlatively salacious peaks of heaven. Mmmmmmmmm. Even now I still want them.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||10/12/2018|
Yeah, Patricia Arquette was a much better actress, and better looking, than Tuesday Knight.
But DL has at least one Tuesday Knight superfan who collected all of her albums.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||10/12/2018|
In all honesty, Ira Heiden as the handicapped nerd was cute.
He's not really handicapped and would have made an excellent Twink Bottom Bitch.
|by Anonymous||reply 74||Last Saturday at 2:14 PM|
The promo for the Paramount marathon is actually pretty funny:
|by Anonymous||reply 75||Last Saturday at 2:22 PM|
Say what you want about 4, but you have to admit it made for one hell of a music video:
|by Anonymous||reply 76||Last Monday at 2:17 PM|
Is this the one where Freddy's fingers turn into syringes that he injects into the junkie girl, saying, "What a RUSH!"
|by Anonymous||reply 77||Last Monday at 2:26 PM|
Pretty sure that's 3: The Dream Warriors, R77.
|by Anonymous||reply 78||Last Monday at 7:04 PM|
Yes, r77, this thread is about the movie with the syringe overdose dream.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||Last Monday at 10:58 PM|
No love for my cameo, dahlinks?
|by Anonymous||reply 80||Last Monday at 11:03 PM|
|by Anonymous||reply 81||Last Tuesday at 6:06 AM|