Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Hollywood Screen Tests

Here's a wonderful reel of Gone With The Wind screen tests.

While some of the actresses auditioning to play Scarlett O'Hara were clearly all wrong for the part, others, like Paulette Goddard, were quite good.

Included are (silent) tests of Leslie Howard and Clark Gable, who melts the screen.

Please add any of your favorite screen tests, or related commentary.

by Anonymousreply 12012/13/2017

Not only did Coppola have to fight for Al Pacino to play Michael Corleone, but the part was very nearly played by James Caan, Robert Redford, even Martin Sheen. Caan's screen test is pretty bad.

Diane Keaton's audition is also here, towards the end.

by Anonymousreply 112/07/2017

Paulette Goddard is an underrated actress who lost out on the part because she refused to confirm she and Chaplin were married. (they were)

oddly enough, Vivian Leigh was having an affair with Olivier, both were married to others and had small children, but that didn't stop her from playing Scarlett.

by Anonymousreply 212/07/2017

Help me out, R2. Why would it matter that Goddard was married to Chaplin? Was he in trouble at the time?

by Anonymousreply 312/07/2017

James Dean and Paul Newman audition for East of Eden. Their attraction to each other here is palpable.

At 1:01

Dean: Kiss me.

Newman: Can't right here.

by Anonymousreply 412/07/2017

R3, being unmarried and living together could ruin a screen career in 1938.

by Anonymousreply 512/07/2017

Why is Paulette Goddard auditioning with Nicholas Cage?

by Anonymousreply 612/07/2017

R4, omg! They had to have ripped each others clothes off minutes later. I'm gonna watch it again.

by Anonymousreply 712/07/2017

I found one of actresses testing for Lois Lane.

There's Anne Archer, Lesley Ann Warren, Debra Raffin, Margot Kidder, a very butch Stockard Channing, and Susan Blakely.

Lesley Ann comes in at 1:56 and I must say I truly missngi seeing her on the screen. She may be a little over the top here, but God I love her.

(Christopher Reeve has the presence of paste.)

by Anonymousreply 812/07/2017

James Dean, the anti-paste.

This screen test is super-charged with homo eroticism. Who's the other actor? Holy shit.

by Anonymousreply 912/07/2017

Fucking brilliant, OP.

by Anonymousreply 1012/07/2017

R9 At any moment it seemed they could kiss and make out.

by Anonymousreply 1112/07/2017

Goddard and Chaplin claimed to be married but they couldn't produce a marriage certificate. They claimed to have been married at sea on an ocean liner by the Captain but couldn't prove it.

The tests of Gable and Howard aren't screen tests. Neither had to audition. The tests are for their costumes and makeup, to see how they would photograph.

by Anonymousreply 1212/07/2017

Chaplin and Goddard were never married. A grandniece of Goddard told me such.

by Anonymousreply 1312/07/2017

Hmm. I don't believe I've ever seen a Goddard film. What does the DL recommend? She is captivating.

by Anonymousreply 1412/07/2017

The first preview of GWTW ran nearly five hours. Many or most of the cut scenes and trims allegedly exist in the hands of a private collector but they've never been seen publicly if they do.

by Anonymousreply 1512/07/2017

R14 You've never seen Modern Times? The Great Dictator? THE WOMEN???!!!

by Anonymousreply 1612/07/2017

You're right, R16, I have! Back in the 80's... Fucking Geritol is a goddamn snake oil scam.

by Anonymousreply 1712/07/2017

The ones that have always fascinated me the most are the screen tests for the lead tole in "Rebecca." Selznick had another GIANT talent search for the part, and many of the best actresses in Hollywood tried for it.

Laurence Olivier (who was cast beforehand) desperately wanted Vivien Leigh for the part, but she was completely wrong for the part--she was much too kittenish and self-possessed.

by Anonymousreply 1812/07/2017

Tallulah Bankhead tried out of the part of Scarlett? That's pretty funny. At the beginning of the novel Scarlett is 16. Bankhead looked at least 40.

Leslie Howard was handsome but miscast as Ashley. Ashley was 19 or 20 at the time of the barbecue; Leslie Howard was in his 40s. Actually, all the young men at the barbecue were supposed to be in the 19-20 age range, and they all looked much older than that.

Clark Gable was perfect as Rhett. Perfect! As was Vivien Leigh as Scarlett and Hattie McDaniel as Mammy and Olivia De Havilland as Melanie.

by Anonymousreply 1912/07/2017

I wish i could find the other "Rebecca" screen tests on youtube, but I could only find Leigh's and Fontaine's. Fontaine is aboslutely perfect for the part from the get-go. She was so great and conveying insecurity and nervousness (but with great charm all the same).

There are many other screen tests on the Criterion disc set. Surprisingly some excellent actresses lie Margaret Sullavan are completely wrong for the part--Sullavan comes across as deeply neurotic, which is not right for the role.

Surprisngly the most affecting reading comes from Loretta Young, who is deeply poignant--but she was far too beautiful to be believable as the self-deprecating second Mrs. de Winter.

Anne Baxter read for the part at age 16 (!), and she was actually Hithcock's first choice... but Selznick wanted Fontaine, and got his way. Baxter's reading for her screen test is actually excellent (she had not yet picked up the mannerisms that render her so bizarrely artificial in "the Razor's Edge" and "All About Eve"), but having a 16 year-old American girl in the part would have changed the movie very drastically from what we know of it today.

by Anonymousreply 2012/07/2017

And Butterfly McQueen, R19, don't forget that.

by Anonymousreply 2112/07/2017

R20 is very shy.

by Anonymousreply 2212/07/2017

Still lovely at 71.

by Anonymousreply 2312/07/2017

Bankhead's test was the first, in 1936. It was, short, silent and in black and white, just a photography test. Bankhead would have been great. She born into Southern aristocracy and was even more more wild and independent than Scarlett.

At any rate, Selznick didn't like the way she photographed but instructed his assistant to offer her the part of Belle Watling. Neither she nor anyone else on the staff had the balls to contact Bankhead and tell her that Selznick thought she was a good fit to play the town madame and the offer was never passed on.

by Anonymousreply 2412/07/2017

Bankhead was almost 40 when GWTW was filming.

by Anonymousreply 2512/07/2017

Gwyneth Paltrow and Helen Hunt audition for "Jurassic Park" (1992)

by Anonymousreply 2612/07/2017

Tallulah Bankhead as a fresh young 16 year old Southern belle? That would have made Gone With The Wind a science fiction movie.

by Anonymousreply 2712/07/2017

Ugh. Paltrow and her diffident, bubble headed upspeak. Scientist my ass. She's about as convincing as a woman of science as Tanya Roberts was in "A View to A Kill".

Helen would have worked just fine.

by Anonymousreply 2812/07/2017

R19 - actually Ashley was about 25-26 at the time of the barbecue. He had graduated college, spent 3 years on his "Grand Tour" and spent 2 years squiring Scarlett around the county. So Scarlett was 16 and Ashley 25 or so when the ook and movie begins. The Tarleton twins were supposed to be 19 and the other boys around 20 - but you are right, they look around 30.

by Anonymousreply 2912/07/2017

I've always thought Clark Gable was less than perfect as Rhett because he doesn't sound anything like someone out of Charleston, SC.

by Anonymousreply 3012/07/2017

[quote] Bankhead would have been great. She born into Southern aristocracy and was even more more wild and independent than Scarlett.

George Cukor once said about Tallulah Bankhead, "She had beautiful bones, but her eyes were not eyes for movies. They looked somehow hooded and dead.... Her smile did not illuminate."

by Anonymousreply 3112/07/2017

'Tippi' Hedren's screen test depicted in the HBO film "The Girl". Watching Sienna Miller attempt to re-create Miss Hedren's beauty, elan and effortless elegance was excruciatingly painful to watch. It literally looked like a 6yo prancing around in mommy's high heels.

Hedren was actually ONE of three actresses Hitchcock tested(the others being Claire Griswold and Joanna Moore) and were reportedly the most expensive tests in Hollywood history.

It's easy to see why she was selected. Wonderful, mid-Atlantic inflections, refined posture and body line and bitch knew how to wear and manipulate her Edith Head created costumes. I especially love how at 00:35 she gracefully removes the wrap, catches it behind her back and subtly "presents" the gown all while deftly emasculating Martin Balsam.

She breezily fends off the creepy boorishness of Hitch and Balsam and is stylized to the point of pantomime....which was precisely the aesthetic Hitchcock was going for.

by Anonymousreply 3212/07/2017

Great thread, OP.

r26 wasn't Spielberg Gwenyth's godfather? Glad he and the casting director didn't let that connection compromise their casting decision.

As much as I like Laura Dern, I think Helen Hunt would have been a great choice. Within ten seconds, I totally believed her, unlike Gwenyth's disastrous audition.

by Anonymousreply 3312/07/2017

Sharon Stone, Basic Instinct.

Say what you will about Stone, but she is completely magnetic in this screen test. And just watching her, there's no doubt she knew she had that part in the bag.

by Anonymousreply 3412/07/2017

Jeanne Tripplehorn's "Basic Instinct" test was pretty much "in the bag, too".

I actually found her character more compelling than Stone's.

by Anonymousreply 3512/07/2017

Leslie Ann Warren was a cutie but too neurotic, pop eyed and high strung for Lois Lane. She always gives off a dirty sex vibe. I wasn't even born in 1977 but it's easy to see why Kidder won that role. She's layered and charming, flinty and sweet. Not pretty, but ironic. She would never be cast today.

by Anonymousreply 3612/07/2017

R9, that's Dick Davalos, Dean's co-star in "East of Eden."

by Anonymousreply 3712/07/2017

R37, thanks alot for that. What an electric pairing they are.

by Anonymousreply 3812/07/2017

That delicious eye roll when he mentions Tallulah Bankhead.....the sexiest man alive. Marlon Brando in his Rebel Without a Cause screen test and "interview."

by Anonymousreply 3912/07/2017

[quote]Leslie Ann Warren was a cutie but too neurotic, pop eyed and high strung for Lois Lane

As long as we're discussing "Superman" related screen tests here are some of the other actresses who auditioned for the role of "Ursa".

Sarah Douglas was ideal but if you ever wanted to see Alexis Carrington with super powers then I think Dana Gillespie could have been great as well. And she could do stunts.

by Anonymousreply 4012/08/2017

Here's Audrey Hepburn's famous screen test for Roman Holiday. They told her the camera was turned off when she started talking about surviving WWII as a teen. Apparently this part of the screen test won William Wyler over and he gave her the role of Princess Anna:

by Anonymousreply 4112/08/2017

Chris Klein's screen test for Mamma Mia has to be seen (or should I say heard) to be believed.

by Anonymousreply 4212/08/2017

Hard to believe a man so handsome, so jaunty and so cool was just a B-list television actor. He even makes talking with a cigarette in your mouth look sexy.

He's every inch the star everyone thinks George Clooney is.

by Anonymousreply 4312/08/2017

r43 he screamed desperate and his acting is terrible. what's hard to believe?

by Anonymousreply 4412/08/2017

a very butch Stockard Channing,

Is there any other kind?

by Anonymousreply 4512/08/2017

Can I stop this thread for a moment to implore everyone to watch R42 's submission?

I almost didn't click, thinking who is this guy?


R42, I am giving you kudos. I created this thread hoping for revelation, and you delivered.

Thank you.

by Anonymousreply 4612/08/2017

R42 is better than Pierce Brosnan.

by Anonymousreply 4712/08/2017

R42 Currently wins this thread. By a wide margin.

But oh how sweet it would be to find competitors for the throne!

by Anonymousreply 4812/08/2017

Here you go, R48

by Anonymousreply 4912/08/2017

What ever happened to her, anyway? She is not very good here.

by Anonymousreply 5012/08/2017

Blonde god William Katt and Kurt Russell test for Star Wars

by Anonymousreply 5112/08/2017

R20 wouldn't Hedy Lamarr have made a great Mrs. DeWinter. I realize we never see her but still, she was exactly the type.

by Anonymousreply 5212/08/2017

Where the hell is Liza's test for Russell's EVITA?!

by Anonymousreply 5312/08/2017

R50 NO ONE was particularly good. They didn't know what the fuck was going on! Nowadays its less forgivable because this genre has been around long enough that this goobledygook should be more familiar by acclimatization.

by Anonymousreply 5412/08/2017

R54 what are you talking about, have you been drinking? Am I gonna have to go all Rhoda Young on your ass? Put down the PBR before you burn your damn house down.

by Anonymousreply 5512/08/2017

PBR?! I'm more likely to have a PBJ!

I was referring to the technobabble and heightened language that is rife in Sci-Fi. American actors in particular don't comprehend it or internalize it, esp in '76. Now, its more common.

by Anonymousreply 5612/08/2017

I agreed to narrate this piece as the work originated on the legitimate stage.

by Anonymousreply 5712/08/2017

[quote][R43] he screamed desperate and his acting is terrible. what's hard to believe?

I would say that assessment would apply more to R42.

by Anonymousreply 5812/08/2017

Miss Fire Prevention

by Anonymousreply 5912/08/2017

Funny Girl would have been so much better with someone other than Streisand.

by Anonymousreply 6012/08/2017

[quote]Funny Girl would have been so much better with someone other than Streisand.

Funny Girl wouldn't have been POSSIBLE without Streisand.

by Anonymousreply 6112/08/2017

Love these! More please.

by Anonymousreply 6212/08/2017

Gillian tests for Pathe in 1944.

by Anonymousreply 6312/08/2017

And when our good housekeeper, poor Mrs. Cooper, finds out what you've been doing on these "supposed" fishing trips of ours......

I'm afraid the blow will kill her.

by Anonymousreply 6412/08/2017

Maybe she's doing a screen test for a film on how not to do a screen test r63.

by Anonymousreply 6512/08/2017

Any Tab Hunter or Tony Perkins screen tests out there?

by Anonymousreply 6612/08/2017

Awesome link, OP.

I can't believe Joan Bennet was ever in the running. I am assuming Paulette knew how close she came to getting the role. She must have been heart broken.

by Anonymousreply 6712/08/2017

Thanks, R67, glad you enjoyed it. Had I been Paulette Goddard I never would have gotten over the loss. Much like owning then losing a jackpot lotto ticket.

R66, I googled both Tab Hunter and Tony Perkins, came up with nothing. Maybe someone out there can help us out (a private collection,maybe?) Great suggestions.

by Anonymousreply 6812/08/2017

[quote] Had I been Paulette Goddard I never would have gotten over the loss. Much like owning then losing a jackpot lotto ticket.

She got over it, all right - she was extremely rich by the time she died in her lakeside Swiss villa and left more than 20 million $ to NYU alone in her will.

by Anonymousreply 6912/08/2017

Always fascinating Sandy Dennis' screen test for Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf. With Roddy McDowall.

by Anonymousreply 7012/08/2017

I found this. I don't know what this is. But I'm leaving it here.

by Anonymousreply 7112/08/2017

Sandy Dennis can do no wrong. Good one, R70.

She's another one I'd have loved to have over for dinner. Strange, peculiar lady with a fascinating brain.

by Anonymousreply 7212/08/2017

Ann-Margret the enchantress.

Could anyone else have been a contender after this? Is there anyone who didn't fall immediately in love with her?

by Anonymousreply 7312/08/2017

Bill Bailey, you're a fool for ever leaving in the first place.

by Anonymousreply 7412/08/2017

Oh what the hell, let's make it a trifecta.

by Anonymousreply 7512/08/2017

Wardrobe tests with Judy.

She seems to become a little wobbly. Maybe it's just me.

by Anonymousreply 7612/08/2017

While not a screen test, this is rehearsal footage mixed in with Judy's actual performance.

It's extremely disturbing, and very sad.

by Anonymousreply 7712/08/2017

Paulette as Scarlett is so fascinating to ponder. She would have been great but entirely different from Vivien Leigh.

Paulette is foxier, sexier, earthier but could never convince Rhett or the audience that she was a virginal well-brought up 16 year old. American vs British demeanor, and while you'd think the former would be preferable and more logical, I completely get why Selznick and Cukor went with the latter.

by Anonymousreply 7812/09/2017

Great thread for this snowy day. I may just binge on Ann-Margret movies til spring.

by Anonymousreply 7912/09/2017

Here's a lengthier companion piece to the Audrey Hepburnscreen test up-thread.

This one has fantastic commentary from wardrobe designer Edith Head!

by Anonymousreply 8012/09/2017

Edith Head gave good wardrobe

by Anonymousreply 8112/09/2017

I can see why they snatched Ann-Margret up.

by Anonymousreply 8212/09/2017

I don't think Edith was terribly loved or appreciated by Audrey Hepburn and Grace Kelly.

As soon as Roman Holiday made her a star, Audrey used that power to insist that her friend Hubert de Givenchy design her wardrobe for her next film Sabrina. Head still got the credit as Paramount's resident Costume Designer.

And Grace Kelly asked MGM's Helen Rose to design her wedding gown for her royal Monaco wedding in spite of Head's best efforts in several of Kelly's Hitchcock films.

by Anonymousreply 8312/09/2017

That Chris Klein clip is hilarious

by Anonymousreply 8412/09/2017

Audrey Hepburn was exquisite.

by Anonymousreply 8512/09/2017

I can’t watch at r42. I can’t stand 2nd hand embarrassment. Anyone want to sum it up?

by Anonymousreply 8612/09/2017

He acts like a chummy douchebro and then sings off-key, sometimes way off. You should watch it.

by Anonymousreply 8712/09/2017

R77 what was so sad and disturbing about that? Thrill us with your acumen. Judy was rehearsing that’s why they call it a rehearsal. When it was showtime she was polished, poised and at the top of her game. That’s what you call a professional. And I think it’s magnificent.

by Anonymousreply 8812/09/2017

I'm a bit surprised at the relative lack of comments on R4's Dean-Newman screen test.

That had to have been buried for years, the sparks between them were so undeniable that I can't see a studio letting it see the light of day. Had it been in color I'd bet Newman's face and neck were bright red. I've watched it several times now. If you haven't watched yet I recommend you do.

Same goes for R9's post.

by Anonymousreply 8912/09/2017

Rebel without a Cause tests

by Anonymousreply 9012/09/2017

Head was NOTORIOUS for stealing design credits.

Only Givenchy dared to sue, however, and he won.

by Anonymousreply 9112/09/2017

R91, "The minx in mink, with a yen for men?"

Well done, indeed.

by Anonymousreply 9212/09/2017

Sal Mineo.....yum...

by Anonymousreply 9312/09/2017

Head made the first version of the mink dress with heavy lead beads. It was so heavy that Rogers could barely walk, much less dance. in it . Director Mitchell Liesen had to instruct Head to have her costume department rebuild it with sequins instead of heavy lead beads as the brilliants. Leisen, who had started his career as a costume designer for Cecil DeMille, had given Head a sketch of what he wanted and even a written description. She later claimed the dress as her own design and she and Leisen were enemies thereafter. All she really did basically was supervise the Paramount costume department in cutting the patterns and the dress's construction. Leisen was the real designer and it became a very minor Hollywood scandal.

It was only years later, when Givenchy finally sued her successfully for claiming credit for his designs for Audrey Hepburn, that people finally became aware of what she really was.

Don't get me started about her ruthless, vicious backstabbing of her former mentor Travis Banton in order to replace him as head of Paramount's costume department.

by Anonymousreply 9412/10/2017

The Hollywood studios employed many brilliant designers over the years in the golden age but only Adrian at MGM and Banton at Paramount were true couturiers who could have been equally successful in Paris if they had so chosen. Banton was indeed a true mentor to Head, who repaid him by spreading awful rumors and lies about him that lead to his forced resignation from Paramount and her succeeding him as head of the costume department.

by Anonymousreply 9512/10/2017

More dish about Edith Head, please. I had no idea she was such a gigantic cunt.

by Anonymousreply 9612/10/2017

But, sadly, the studio heads loved Edith Head, who loyally stayed on budget and efficiently ran her department, rather than a true artist like Travis Banton. They hated that Banton had so much control over their leading ladies like Dietrich, Colbert, Lombard and Mae West. And Banton's unpredictable drunken binges didn't exactly help his case.

Similarly, after Adrian retired from MGM, LB Mayer never allowed a costume designer or head of wardrobe to gain the kind of power Adrian wielded. He was replaced by the more reliable and mundane Irene and eventually Helen Rose. The other Irene, the fabulously talented Irene Sharaff, was spunkier and not easy to control, but she was never interested in a long term and exclusive contract with any studio.

Was there also some kind of homophobia at play at the studios (never mind that some of those ladies were closeted lesbians)?

by Anonymousreply 9712/10/2017

R97 et al, I'd like to single you out as a great raconteur and contributor to this thread.

Without becoming too invasive, may I ask how it is you've come too know so many details to so many stories of old Hollywood?

I thank you very much.

by Anonymousreply 9812/10/2017

Thanks, OP.

I've always been interested and curious about old Hollywood, ever since I was a little kid watching b&w vintage films on TV. My natural curiosity just led me to reading books and articles and interviews. I'm especially fascinated by all of the behind the scenes areas of the early film industry like costume design.

by Anonymousreply 9912/10/2017

Hugh Jackman, Wolverine

by Anonymousreply 10012/10/2017

Julia Roberts with Alan Boyce in a test for Blue Heaven

by Anonymousreply 10112/10/2017

Jennifer Garner, Elektra

by Anonymousreply 10212/10/2017

From another dimension, Lindsay Lohan, ten and a half years old, The Parent Trap.

She and Dennis Quaid engage in an unscripted chat at 2:06.

by Anonymousreply 10312/10/2017

Koko, testing for Red Dog.

by Anonymousreply 10412/10/2017

Tom Selleck, for Indiana Jones.

by Anonymousreply 10512/10/2017

Wow Sean Young and Tom Selleck? Sean sure missed out on a lot of good parts.

by Anonymousreply 10612/10/2017

Tom Selleck just screams TV star.

by Anonymousreply 10712/10/2017

I'm loving this thread.

by Anonymousreply 10812/11/2017

This one blew me away. I never saw the movie, but to think this tape is only an audition? This guy is genius. I would not want to be the actor to follow this audition.

by Anonymousreply 10912/11/2017

She's a natural. Her screen partner gives her nothing to work with, yet she emotes and cries right on cue. Never saw this film. Curious now.

by Anonymousreply 11012/11/2017

OP, R98: I posted the first and following posts about Liesen, de Givenchy, Head's notorious design stealing and backstabbing Banton, and yet you thanked r97. Well, I never. What a swell party THIS is.

Lucas and Spielberg desperately wanted Selleck for the first Indiana Jones film and offered Magnum PI's TV producers every accomodation and a small fortune to free him up for just a very few weeks to do the film but they would barely negotiate. Selleck was furious and devasted. He despately wanted the role. And then the Jones film wrapped up a few days early and he could have done both projects without either interfering with the other.

by Anonymousreply 11112/11/2017

Pity Ann-Margret's screen test for Hello, Dolly! is not on YouTube. I seem to remember it being on a Fox video. She tested for Irene Malloy.

by Anonymousreply 11212/12/2017

I really don’t know anything about Sal Mineo or James Dean, but the above links were interesting. I’m going to check out the Rebel movie over the holidays. I wonder if it’s on netflix or hulu.

by Anonymousreply 11312/12/2017

R111, I 'm sorry for my witless flub. What can I say. You, too, are a gift to this thread. Thank you.

Now come get your crown, you've earned it.

by Anonymousreply 11412/12/2017

Poor Tom. Sad story.

by Anonymousreply 11512/12/2017

I'm playing catch-up with all these clips, and I gotta thank R64 for the Batman test. The double-entendres are a scream and it's all so very very gay.

Which brought me to this clip of all the guest stars doing those campy window cameos. While they are not screen tests, they're a delicious side dish to the thread and I hope you enjoy it.

by Anonymousreply 11612/12/2017

Screen test for Titanic with La Winslet and Jeremy Sisto in the Leo role

by Anonymousreply 11712/12/2017

I wonder why their screen tests involved full costuming, hair and make-up? I was under the impression that those things were tested after final casting.

I don't care for Leo but Sisto and Winslet have dud chemistry. Thanks R117.

by Anonymousreply 11812/12/2017

I didn't think Leo and Kate had much of the right kind of chemistry. (Yeah, I know, I'm the only person in the world who thinks that).

She seemed like a elegant, slightly hard, worldly teacher that schoolboy Leo was intimidated by but not sexually attracted to.

by Anonymousreply 11912/12/2017

Were they testing both Kate and Jeremy in that Titanic screen test or just one of them?

by Anonymousreply 12012/13/2017
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Don't you just LOVE clicking on these things on every single site you visit? I know we do! You can thank the EU parliament for making everyone in the world click on these pointless things while changing absolutely nothing. If you are interested you can take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT and we'll set a dreaded cookie to make it go away. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!