Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Corey Feldman Blasts “Call Me By Your Name” for Glamorizing Pedophilia

Can’t say I disagree.

by Anonymousreply 150Last Monday at 1:10 PM

I don't either OP.

by Anonymousreply 112/06/2017

Armie is supposed to be 24 in the movie? He looks like a 40 year old man to me.

by Anonymousreply 212/06/2017

Didn't she used to be somebody?

by Anonymousreply 312/06/2017

Corey Feldman's 1993 audio files naming alleged sexual predators found by Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office

by Anonymousreply 412/06/2017

Please F/F the OP. That “can’t say I disagree” horse shit is PURE HOMOPHOBIA.

Chalamet’s character in “Call Me By Your Name” is of the legal age of consent in Italy and Europe where the movie is set.

Furthermore, it is the younger man who initiates and pursues the romance consensually —NOT an old perv harassing the younger Corey Feldman.

Feldman is an idiot who can’t think or speak properly.

by Anonymousreply 512/06/2017

But its not pedophilia, Rose.

by Anonymousreply 612/06/2017

The righties have been saying for years now that we would try to normalize pedophilia and I thought it was the most ridiculous thing in the world. Now here we are with Hollywood trying to push this as the movie of the year. It’s unbelievable.

by Anonymousreply 712/06/2017

This article is a week old.

by Anonymousreply 812/06/2017

[QUOTE]That “can’t say I disagree” horse shit is PURE HOMOPHOBIA

FF R5 for equating homosexuality with pedophilia.

by Anonymousreply 912/06/2017

Some thoughts:

If they had made the character 18, would there be any discussion about this?

I haven't seen the movie but isn't the 17 year-old the pursuer in this relationship?

I live in NYS and the legal age of consent is 16.

People should really be talking about Roy Moore and his 14 year olds.

by Anonymousreply 1012/06/2017

All of this completely unnecessary backlash could have been easily avoided with a simple act of ageing the character up to 18. That's it. We love to shit on big studio execs but they would have caught this potential danger immediately.

And Corey Feldman is latching onto whatever he can to stay relevant. It' getting sadder and sadder to watch.

by Anonymousreply 1112/06/2017

R7, go nail yourself to a cross.

Call Me By Your Name is NOT PEDOPHILIA.

F/F

by Anonymousreply 1212/06/2017

I'm going to adore this film with its sumptuous locales and the story of blossoming love between a younger guy and a hot older guy. When I was very young I was always attracted to sexy older guys.

by Anonymousreply 1312/06/2017

You mean all those movies I watched growing up, where the teenage boy had sex with the nanny, tutor, mom's friend, etc were really glamorizing pedophilia ?

by Anonymousreply 1412/06/2017

It's always the teen conveniently pursuing the old dudes. Isn't that always the fantasy of these old men (Woody Allen, Louis CK)?

by Anonymousreply 1512/06/2017

The old guys probably make these movies to encourage young people to think this way.

by Anonymousreply 1612/06/2017

[QUOTE]It's always the teen conveniently pursuing the old dudes. Isn't that always the fantasy of these old men (Woody Allen, Louis CK)?

That’s how they got this in the door. Make the young guy look like a sex crazed maniac lusting after the older guy who eventually succumbs to his advances. If it were the other way around, this movie wouldn’t have been accepted.

by Anonymousreply 1712/06/2017

That man is the same age Katie Kanisky was when she went after a 34-year-old male professor on [italic]Gimme A Break![/italic] Nell shoved her in the closet so America would know how she felt in real life.

There's nothing wrong with teenage boys being with other teenage boys. [italic]In A Heartbeat[/italic], also made this year, does not condone pederasty nor is it a thinly-veiled excuse for adults to perv on teens. I wanted an older man when I was a teen, but wanting something and being ready for it are two different things.

And as for Armie Hammer:

by Anonymousreply 1812/06/2017

FFS you fraus are tiresome. Why don't you take your violated twats to your mommy sites?

by Anonymousreply 1912/06/2017

[quote]It's always the teen conveniently pursuing the old dudes.

I hate this non-defence as well but to be honest, I was also a sex-crazed horny maniac at 15. Judgment only came into play at around 17 or 18 and I would [italic]never[/italic] think of pulling the sex shit I pulled at 15 ever again.

by Anonymousreply 2012/06/2017

[QUOTE]FFS you fraus are tiresome.

I’m a gay man.

by Anonymousreply 2112/06/2017

R19 It's not the fraus because the fraus adore this movie.

by Anonymousreply 2212/06/2017

We live in a country where it is legal for a 90-year-old and a 18-year-old to have sex, but not a 20-year-old and a 15-year-old, and where people become sex offenders before they're old enough to have sex.

by Anonymousreply 2312/06/2017

So you want 90 year old men to be able to have sex with 15 year old boys, R23?

by Anonymousreply 2412/06/2017

The main character of Queer As Folk was 17 when he started a sexual relationship with Bryan who was...28 or something. And interesting enough, the main female character of that show is married to Bryan Singer.

by Anonymousreply 2512/06/2017

No, R24. I just don't think it's fair to make criminals out of horny teenagers except in extreme cases of sexual violence. There are US states where the age of consent is 16, like much of the rest of the west including the UK and Israel.

by Anonymousreply 2612/06/2017

fuck Corey Feldman... so sick of his irrelevant sorry ass...

by Anonymousreply 2712/06/2017

R25: The superior-because-it-couldn't-possibly-be-worse UK version made him 15. At the time the UK had differential ages of consent for homosexual and heterosexual sex. It was 16 for heteros and 21 for gays.

by Anonymousreply 2812/06/2017

[quote] fuck Corey Feldman...

I'd rather have Chad Allen, since he's actually gay and he was the voice of Charlie Brown at one point.

by Anonymousreply 2912/06/2017

Elio is SEVENTEEN. Didn't you seek out older guys when you were 17 and have sex with them? Jeeze.

by Anonymousreply 3012/06/2017

Pedophiles around the world point to countries/states where the age of consent is below 18 because they slowly want to chip away at age limits.

Is someone who is 17 years and 11 months old that much less mature than someone who is 18? It's the definition of the "slippery slope."

Sorry dudes, you can't fuck 'em (or download videos of them naked) until they turn eighteen.

by Anonymousreply 3112/06/2017

[QUOTE]There are US states where the age of consent is 16, like much of the rest of the west including the UK and Israel.

So you want the age of consent to be 16 nationwide? Or would you like to go lower?

by Anonymousreply 3212/06/2017

[quote]It's the definition of the "slippery slope."

It's a fallacious form of reasoning no matter what.

[quote] So you want the age of consent to be 16 nationwide? Or would you like to go lower?

I'm not comfortable with anything below that. 16 is when most people are done with puberty and thus the sex organs have completed physical development. Everyone I've met who lost their virginity before the end of puberty convinced me that it's not good to lose it before then. I'm all for obeying age of consent laws but we need to come to a consensus on when a child becomes an adult, and unfortunately the laws and science aren't in sync on this.

by Anonymousreply 3312/06/2017

It's not pedophilia!

by Anonymousreply 3412/06/2017

[quote]Is someone who is 17 years and 11 months old that much less mature than someone who is 18? It's the definition of the "slippery slope."

Yeah, it's ridiculous to assume people turn into adults at the stroke of midnight on their 18th birthday. We're never getting to the bottom of this debate as people mature at different rates, sexually, mentally, and emotionally. I think 16 is a nice compromise, with 14 definitely being too low and 18 too high. That's judging by my own experience growing up, not that I would ever have sex with anyone below 20. But prosecuting an 18-year-old for having sex with a 17-year-old just seems wrong to me.

by Anonymousreply 3512/06/2017

Well once it’s lowered to 16, what happens when we start prosecuting 16 or 17 year olds for having sex with 15 year olds?

by Anonymousreply 3612/06/2017

Pedophilia = attraction to pre-pubescent children 17 = over the age of consent across Europe, in Canada, in the majority of US states and in the vast, vast majority of the world Call Me By Your Name = a love story between two legally consenting adults that have both been through puberty Corey Feldman = a mentally ill man that abuses women in his own home, telling them what to eat, wear and so on as seen on 'Celebrity Wife Swap'

by Anonymousreply 3712/06/2017

It's not pedophilia because neither of them are children. If this were an adult taking advantage of a prepubescent child, Corey would have every right to be angry.

by Anonymousreply 3812/06/2017

[quote] Well once it’s lowered to 16, what happens when we start prosecuting 16 or 17 year olds for having sex with 15 year olds?

Don't some states and countries have age-span windows that allow teenagers to date other teenagers without being harassed by the authorities?

by Anonymousreply 3912/06/2017

[quote] Yeah, it's ridiculous to assume people turn into adults at the stroke of midnight on their 18th birthday.

In the eyes of the law, that's EXACTLY how it works.

You're either an adult, or a minor. Would you prefer a physician's note declaring that little Johnny has reached both physical and emotional maturity at 15 1/2 and he's now cleared for sex with adults? Every sexual pairing to be judged on a case-by-case basis?

Eighteen is the limit, and don't try to enlist gay men who have no interest in sex with 17,16, and 15 year-olds in your campaign to lower the age of consent.

by Anonymousreply 4012/06/2017

Loretta Lynn married Doolittle when she was 15 and he was 22. If it's good enough for the Queen of Country Music, then it's good enough for us.

by Anonymousreply 4112/06/2017

Remember this song, Cor?

"When a young man looks at Madame

She just throws herself right at 'im;

She's young at heart

And still getting her kicks."

by Anonymousreply 4212/06/2017

FF OP

by Anonymousreply 4312/06/2017

Woody Allen's "Annie Hall Monitor"

by Anonymousreply 4412/06/2017

I was thinking that too R25-- he was supposed to have been a high school student and the Brian character was a 30 year old ad guy.

I think they dodged a bullet because Gale Harold looked a whole lot younger than 30 and so the age difference wasn't as obvious as between Hammer and Chalomet.

by Anonymousreply 4512/06/2017

Did Corey Feldman get annoyed with Dirty Dancing? The characters are the same exact age in both films. Where was his outrage then?

I do feel sorry for anyone abused, but at this point we have been reading about the experiences of literally hundreds of women and men. Yes, everyone processes things differently but It has to be said Corey's career has been about his "experiences" for years now. Either shit or get off the pot, as they say.

Of course one can speculate and allege he is playing the blackmail game and it is just a cash grab but now things may not be so easy. But I am sre that is not the case.

by Anonymousreply 4612/06/2017

"But it's the law" is also a bad argument.

by Anonymousreply 4712/06/2017

God, how the fuck did so many R7s find DL suddenly? Truly Victorian prudes. And if he really is a gay man, then we are in trouble. The line between frau housewife and gay guy are blurred to the extreme these days (unless they are all women and just lying about it, which I truly hope).

by Anonymousreply 4812/06/2017

I think it's an optical thing R46

Harold and Harrison are the same ages as Chalamet and Hammer in that photo at R45 (21 and 30) but the age difference is nowhere as stark.

And Jennifer Grey looked a whole lot older than 16 in Dirty Dancing

by Anonymousreply 4912/06/2017

FF to everyone who FF'd someone earlier in the thread

by Anonymousreply 5012/06/2017

Film is gross.

by Anonymousreply 5112/06/2017

Corey Feldman has benefited from heterosexual privilege for decades and still does to this day, even douching it up on basic cable in the 2000s in ways that were extremely degrading to women. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for this mainly because I, too, am a survivor of extreme physical and emotional abuse at the hands of adults, but not sexual abuse. But after this, I'm not so sure. Maybe if he were a better actor he would have gotten further. You don't hear Jason Bateman complaining about his career, do you? Oh, right, that's because unlike Corey he can act and some of the TV shows he was on were actually hits.

He needs to save his outrage for people who are actually abusing children.

by Anonymousreply 5212/06/2017

When I was 14 Kevin Spacey made a pass

He was 26 and drunk and he wanted my ass

I said "no, I'm too young; get your hands off of me"

And now he's a pariah, and Von Trapp is Paul Getty!

by Anonymousreply 5312/06/2017

Do we really think this Call Me film will be a box office success, or even break even. Seriously, as others have pointed out, the optics and timing are not good.

by Anonymousreply 5412/06/2017

[quote]When I was very young I was always attracted to sexy older guys. Weren't we all?

If I wanted to get laid, older guys were it. They had cars.

by Anonymousreply 5512/06/2017

I used up all my FFs in this thread. Can someone please hit r54?

by Anonymousreply 5612/06/2017

It's doing quite well for an Indie film [R54]

by Anonymousreply 5712/06/2017

R13 I couldn't agree more. When I was 17 and never even kissed a guy I could only dream of an attractive older guy liking me or me having the guts to pursue him. The movie is a beautiful fairytale with a crushing ending. These articles and likening the story to paedophilia are poisonous and deeply unfair.

by Anonymousreply 5812/06/2017

When I was 16 I longed for the love of another man who knew what he was doing, not a boy, but a man. And I didn't just want one-night stands. I wanted to connect on an emotional level. But those men saw me as just another boy to avoid lest their lives be ruined. Now that I'm older, I understand why. Even once I started having relationships with men they were with (slightly) older men. I don't know, maybe part of it is getting to know people who knew what the world was like before I was born who were there for what I missed.

[quote]The movie is a beautiful fairytale with a crushing ending.

Thanks for spoiling it. We get enough sad endings in real life and we have enough of them in gay movies. Where are our Princes Charming? Where are our knights in shining armor? Why is "and they lived happily ever after" never the last thing you see or hear in a gay film? It happens in real life but almost never in movies, at least not from Hollywood, at least not in movies that get any mainstream exposure in the United States at all. Can't the tears at the end ever be tears of joy for two gay men who find each other and make love last? Or must I make these movies myself?

by Anonymousreply 5912/06/2017

I hate to say it because I think the story in itself is lovey, but...yea it can be seen as a degradable on a subject matter of child sex.

by Anonymousreply 6012/06/2017

At least the lovers in [italic]God's Own Country[/italic] aren't teenagers.

by Anonymousreply 6112/06/2017

Dear god the frautrage in this thread because some hysteric lives in a state where the age of consent is a year older than the age of consent in a foreign country. The Paedofinder General here whipping themselves into hysteria over something that is legal, consensual and,that is a perfectly standard / common subject for drama is fucking ludicrous. And save pointing the finger you nutcase - I'm in my fifties and my particular kink is that I can only really get off sharing a bed with someone whose body is in a similar state of decay as my own.

by Anonymousreply 6212/06/2017

frautrage is a masterpiece. but i don't want to break the pattern so FF for R62

by Anonymousreply 6312/06/2017

Heterosexual women are handmaidens.

by Anonymousreply 6412/06/2017

[quote] All of this completely unnecessary backlash could have been easily avoided with a simple act of ageing the character up to 18. That's it.

Even better - if they'd turned Oliver into Olivia, they could have made the characters' actions comply not only with the laws of all 50 US states, but also those of India and Egypt. They really missed a trick there!

by Anonymousreply 6512/06/2017
by Anonymousreply 6612/06/2017

R54 You have nothing to worry about. This movie takes year's highest per theater average!

by Anonymousreply 6712/06/2017

Stages in my life : baby - child - teen - adult - senior. All different. This is nothing new. In 1971 my favourite movie was, "The Summer of "42".

by Anonymousreply 6812/06/2017

What r62 said except for that last part.

by Anonymousreply 6912/06/2017

@10 it's more complicated than that. The age of consent in New York is 16 only when the other partner is only 16 if the other partner is under the age of 21. Other than that the age of consent in New York is 17. I'm not saying it's good or bad I'm just saying that's the law.

And here's a thought about Corey Feldman. He was asking for money so that he would name child abusers and I thought that sounded like BS but... If one of his abusers was a Scientologist then he's going to need every buck he can dredge up to protect himself from their wrath. Scientology is known for going after people who accuse celebrity $cientologists of anything illegal or unethical and they do it in the most vicious way possible by legal means and non-legal means.

by Anonymousreply 7012/06/2017

Corey Feldman cares about headlines and money, not getting abusers brought to justice.

Also, he has very public parties. If someone wanted him dead, it would not be hard.

by Anonymousreply 7112/06/2017

[quote]And here's a thought about Corey Feldman. He was asking for money so that he would name child abusers and I thought that sounded like BS but... If one of his abusers was a Scientologist then he's going to need every buck he can dredge up to protect himself from their wrath. Scientology is known for going after people who accuse celebrity $cientologists of anything illegal or unethical and they do it in the most vicious way possible by legal means and non-legal means.

That's not totally implausible. You'd still have to be able to prove it in a court of law, though.

by Anonymousreply 7212/06/2017

Isn't this guy a Michael Jackson defender?

by Anonymousreply 7312/06/2017

[quote]I hate to say it because I think the story in itself is lovey, but...yea it can be seen as a degradable on a subject matter of child sex.

Child sex? When both actors are over 20 it's pretty hard to turn their affair into "child sex".

BTW, I've said it before and I say it again. If hets start bitching about CMBYN sexualizing teens you only have to remind them that teen porn is usually in the top 3 of the most popular genres in straight porn. Many times it's the most popular. You only have to spend a few minutes at porn sites to see that most porn starlets look quite young. In fact it seems that today if you're over 25 you're pretty in the MILF category already.

I'm slightly bi so I watch straight porn as well, and many times I just simply refuse to watch certain totally mainstream porn vids because the girl looks way too young. I'm sure they are always over 18 but still. From that point of view I do get why Chalamet might seem a tad too young but in the end we're talking about a romantic film when in real life thousands of teen girls, younger than Chalamet, are making hardcore porn.

We all know if Chalamet's character was female no one would bat an eyelid.

by Anonymousreply 7412/06/2017

You see such pairings (17 v. 24 year old) all the time if you follow the lives of young celebrities. When Lorde came on the scene, at 17, she had a 24-year-old boyfriend. It's not that uncommon, it would not be thought of as pedophilia if it was a straight couple.

by Anonymousreply 7512/06/2017

Astounding how so many here don't get the gist of the problem. The problem isn't with the 17 year old feeling horny or pursuing an older guy. Many 17 yos will do that. The problem is with the older guy succumbing to this. The movie seems to justify that if a teen is horny enough, persistent enough then it's okay for an older person to give in. It's never ok for a teen hasn't yet developed completely. They don't know better. Most movies & shows that show such a relationship acknowledge that it is wrong. I agree with those that say that changing Elio's age to be 18 plus more importantly hiring an actor for Oliver who actually looked closer to 24 would've made sense. I, for the life of me, do not understand Luca's insistence that Armie play Oliver. It just seems creepy & weird as hell

by Anonymousreply 7612/06/2017

Please. Armie Hammer is 31 and looks 40. Nobody looks at him in that movie and sees a 24 year old.

by Anonymousreply 7712/06/2017

That was in response to R75.

by Anonymousreply 7812/06/2017
by Anonymousreply 7912/06/2017

[QUOTE]I agree with those that say that changing Elio's age to be 18 plus more importantly hiring an actor for Oliver who actually looked closer to 24 would've made sense. I, for the life of me, do not understand Luca's insistence that Armie play Oliver. It just seems creepy & weird as hell.

That was done on purpose. Luca wanted him to be an older looking character all along. The whole “17 and 24” thing is smoke and mirrors so the age gap doesn’t seem that bad.

by Anonymousreply 8012/06/2017

[quote] plus more importantly hiring an actor for Oliver who actually looked closer to 24 would've made sense

This, as mentioned above in Queer As Folk references.

See also the photo below of a 24 year old Zac Efron.

by Anonymousreply 8112/06/2017

[quote]The whole “17 and 24” thing is smoke and mirrors so the age gap doesn’t seem that bad.

You're an idiot. This age gap that was written in the book, which by the way was not written by Luca.

by Anonymousreply 8212/06/2017

Consent should be the only factor as to whether someone can have sex. The law should stay the fuck out of this, it's a person's choice when they want to have sex whether they are 40, 20 or 10.

by Anonymousreply 8312/06/2017

[quote]Astounding how so many here don't get the gist of the problem.

What is this problem supposed to be? Chalamet's character is 17, not 12, not 14, but 17, and he's legal in many or most places. You want to be appalled then be appalled about Nabokov's Lolita where the girl was 12. You want to be appalled be appalled about Roy Moore trying to have sex with 14 year old girls.

R83, well gee, are you pretending to be from NA MBLA or are you for real?

by Anonymousreply 8412/06/2017

Armie must feel under siege right about now.

by Anonymousreply 8512/06/2017

The only people who object to the age difference are those who haven't actually seen the movie

by Anonymousreply 8612/06/2017

I’m aware of the book, R82. Luca was making a movie in his own image, not the goddamn book. If he wanted the dude to be 40 looking then that’s exactly what he’d get.

When I said 17 and 24 was smoke and mirrors, I meant the movie. After casting Armie, it would’ve been logical to change the character’s age in the film rather than foolishly try to pass him off as 24. But they kept him at 24 so it could help calm the impending storm—“Hey, he’s only 7 years older!”

by Anonymousreply 8712/06/2017

Anyone saying Hammer looks like he's 40 in the movie is being deliberately idiotic. He looks like he might be in his late 20s.

by Anonymousreply 8812/06/2017

It's r31 and other Puritans and Perennial Prolonged Childhood advocates who are on a "slippery slope."

For 200,000 years of human existence before the 20th century, the age of consent in all cultures was PUBERTY.

Excessive mommying and sex -negativity invented "adolescence" and pushed society into ever-growing extremes of forced, prolonged childhood!

Why don't you do YOU until somebody gets raped?

by Anonymousreply 8912/06/2017

I have reported the movie Grease to the police for depicting the paedophilic rape of Betty Rizzo, 17 by Kenickie Murdoch, 19. If the producers had not intended to suggest paedophilia they would have got someone considerably older looking than Stockard Channing to play the role. The fiends.

by Anonymousreply 9012/06/2017

sooo gross

by Anonymousreply 9112/06/2017

R91 soo hot, you mean.

by Anonymousreply 9212/06/2017

R92 NO, i meant gross. guy on the right looks like he's a middle age dad. guy on the left doesn't even have an adams apple yet

by Anonymousreply 9312/06/2017

17 is not a child. Stop being ridiculous, assholes.

by Anonymousreply 9412/06/2017

Fuck Corey. He's a grifter.

by Anonymousreply 9512/06/2017

If it wasn't for pedophilia, Corey would completely unemployed.

by Anonymousreply 9612/06/2017

R91 looks like a teacher putting the moves on one of his students.

by Anonymousreply 9712/06/2017

R76 Perfect post.

by Anonymousreply 9812/06/2017

R76 Luca met Armie when he had only done Social Network and had a four hour meeting with him depsite having no project to cast him in. He has been after him since he saw him.

by Anonymousreply 9912/06/2017

Since the article and link are grayed out:

by Anonymousreply 10012/06/2017

R99. Exactly. Creepy as hell as I said

by Anonymousreply 10112/06/2017

reply 83 Seriously? The brain apparently does not fully develop until around mid 20's numb nuts, bad move to let a child believe they know what their doing ..10..wtf?

by Anonymousreply 10212/06/2017

I would have sex with a baby fresh out of the womb. And then I would eat it !

by Anonymousreply 10312/06/2017

There are more photos and vid at DM, can't link for some reason.

The optics are awful.

It looks like it could have been called "Bryan Singer Goes On a Picnic." The younger character is shirtless a lot. It is cringed in this post Spacey and Whalestein era.

by Anonymousreply 10412/06/2017

If gays seem ok with this it just fuels backlash. One is a minor, one much older. Just like Singer.

by Anonymousreply 10512/06/2017

It’s weird cause he’s shirtless all the time when most bony little kids like him hate taking their shirts off.

by Anonymousreply 10612/06/2017

R76

[quote] teen hasn't yet developed completely.

At 17? That's the American perception, not universal notion.

by Anonymousreply 10712/06/2017

R104 I agree at best the timing is well, awkward.

by Anonymousreply 10812/06/2017

The push to normalize pedophilia and incest must be separated from the gay community.

We cannot allow them to use us as a shield under some "queer" umbrella. They are trying to use legal rights to bootstrap, which is bad enough.

This movie has the same potential audience as Chad' s World. Grooming victims and predators.

N A M B L A types, take Dan Savage and Bryan Singer and sink or swim on your own.

by Anonymousreply 10912/06/2017

The Guardian is a big agenda promoter.

The still in puberty appearance is a problem for many, but The Guardian thinks more explicit sex was the answer.

Didn't people grow up hearing "16 gets you 18!"

Adults, mitts off minors. It's not glamorous or edgy, you look like an arrested development perv who can't get or keep an adult.

by Anonymousreply 11012/06/2017

I myself am in a relationship with much younger man. When we first met I was 48, he was 12. I became a friend of his parents to be closer to him and felt the spark between us from the very beginning. I was giving him money and lavish gifts secretly, just to have a chance to look at his sweet eyes and sometimes watch him under the shower and fantasise about popping his cherry. He soon made a move on me, but I resisted. We've been meeting secretly but expressed our love in a purely platonic way, at most we masturbated while looking at each other. I've waited patiently counting the days till he became legal, till the very hour of his birth. Then I ravished his ass and came like a horse all over his face. It was wonderful and I agree with those who said it is always better to wait until the young man becomes an adult in the eyes of law. I am strobgly against pedophilia.

by Anonymousreply 11112/06/2017

Wrong casting, wrong time

by Anonymousreply 11212/06/2017

R111 have you seen the movie yet and did you like it?

by Anonymousreply 11312/06/2017

R111 12 yr. old lust much? Are we suppose to applaud you're 'I wont touch/touched him until he's older' declaration? Fool..

by Anonymousreply 11412/06/2017

Looking at them, clothed, on Ellen is still uncomfortable.

by Anonymousreply 11512/06/2017

R115 how so? Nothing comes up when I click on it

by Anonymousreply 11612/06/2017

The relationship portrayed in the aformentioned movie pertains to ephebophilia, not pedophilia. Words have meanings.

by Anonymousreply 11712/06/2017

There's one or two Paedogeddon Trolls spamming this thread. Couple of blocks and it almost reads like normal people are having a discussion here.

by Anonymousreply 11812/06/2017

He's basically claiming everyone in H'wood is a pedo except MJ.

by Anonymousreply 11912/06/2017

A male enters puberty by 10-13 years of age so there is nothing wrong with the story of a 17 year old and a 24 year old being together and in love. I can relate to R111 as I am also in love with a much younger man but unlike R111, I won't wait till he is of "legal age" since that has no bearing on the physical and emotional maturity of most young men. Instead I will wait until the young man I'm in love with is ready for more than kissing and cuddling, which may occur before he turns 18. 18 is just an arbitrary number and everyone matures at a different pace. Some are ready 14 or 15, some a bit earlier, some a bit later.

by Anonymousreply 12012/06/2017

[quote]We all know if Chalamet's character was female no one would bat an eyelid.

This is heterosexual privilege in a nutshell.

by Anonymousreply 12112/06/2017

All heterosexuality is rape regardless of the age of the partners.

by Anonymousreply 12212/06/2017

R121 Did you not read the original article? It says Louis C. K & Chole Grace Moretz movie with romance between an adult man and a young girl will not be released due to the controversial subject matter.

by Anonymousreply 12312/06/2017

This is a similar reaction that happened in the past with Lolita and Pretty Baby. I would have made the boy 18 and just avoided all this uproar. The book wasn’t that good. Just wait until the religious right learns about the peach and cum. I really think this movie should be shelved. It is not the appropriate time.

The age of consent in NJ is 16, but you don’t see older guys dating high schoolers. It’s interesting that the Mann act would apply if they went from NJ into another state with the same age of consent. Crossing state lines with a minor to have sex is a federal crime.

by Anonymousreply 12412/06/2017

Come on R124 get real Pretty Baby (the film with Brooke Shields?) was creepy. Every pedophiles' wet dream

by Anonymousreply 12512/06/2017

Discuss here instead:

by Anonymousreply 12612/06/2017

[quote] Come on [R124] get real Pretty Baby (the film with Brooke Shields?) was creepy. Every pedophiles' wet dream

Paramount came in second for the bidding war to the movie rights to [italic]Annie[/italic], and based on that I'm glad they didn't get it.

by Anonymousreply 12712/06/2017

Discussion has been moved here:

by Anonymousreply 12812/06/2017

R128 STFU or else.

This is the thread.

You KNOW I am not fooling.

by Anonymousreply 12912/06/2017

Nope.

New thread here:

by Anonymousreply 13012/06/2017

How many people here have even seen the film?

by Anonymousreply 13112/06/2017

NEW THREAD HERE:

by Anonymousreply 13212/06/2017

How will it be a hit when Armie has not had a solo hit yet?

by Anonymousreply 13312/06/2017

NEW THREAD HERE:

by Anonymousreply 13412/06/2017

Armie looks older than his age - but he does not look 40!

by Anonymousreply 13512/06/2017

NEW THREAD HERE:

by Anonymousreply 13612/06/2017

Why when we are still talking about Corey in the other thread?

by Anonymousreply 13712/06/2017

NEW THREAD HERE:

by Anonymousreply 13812/06/2017

Hammer doesn't look 40, you hysterical queens. And WHO CARES what he looks like? People don't decide on these questions based on how old they look like.

by Anonymousreply 13912/06/2017

NEW THREAD HERE:

by Anonymousreply 14012/06/2017

They probably wanted to be edgy and have the character be 17. This was filmed and in the can long before everything hit the fan with Kevin Spacey.

by Anonymousreply 14112/06/2017

NEW THREAD HERE:

by Anonymousreply 14212/06/2017

True r41.

by Anonymousreply 14312/06/2017

If they made a movie about the death of Ann B. Davis, how many threads would there be about it?

by Anonymousreply 14412/06/2017

NEW THREAD HERE:

by Anonymousreply 14512/06/2017

r98 Perfect idiot.

by Anonymousreply 14612/07/2017

I really don't like the idea of kowtowing to the 'wrong time for this movie' ninnies. I'm not liking the fallout of the #metoo push to Puritanism. WTF! It's really getting on my last nerves. Cut the shit, millennials and other sheep. Grow up, mature and stop seeing pedo tendencies everywhere.

by Anonymousreply 14712/07/2017

agreed r147

by Anonymousreply 14812/08/2017

Agreed big time. Puritanism on DL is really strange to see. And so much of it.

by Anonymousreply 14912/09/2017

Why does Corey Feldman seem to think anybody values his opinion? I just want to see him performing train wreck music and weeping about it.

by Anonymousreply 150Last Monday at 1:10 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.
×

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed


recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!