Oh please, Oliver looks like a perv from Central Casting, who is he to throw stones.
John Oliver uses Wag the Dog reunion Q&A to ambush Dustin Hoffman
|by Anonymous||reply 117||12/07/2017|
Oliver should ask Hoffman about his recent male lovers. All in their 20s, including gogo boys...
|by Anonymous||reply 1||12/04/2017|
You mean, OP, that all pervs look British? Oliver isn't one (that we know). So why are you demonizing him?
|by Anonymous||reply 2||12/04/2017|
Even now Dustin is the better-looking of the two.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||12/04/2017|
What's that got to do with anything, r3?
|by Anonymous||reply 4||12/04/2017|
Nothing, but do you seriously disagree on that statement?
|by Anonymous||reply 5||12/04/2017|
WHY WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE "GOOD-LOOKING" ABUSIVE SENIOR?!?!? HE HAS NEEDS AND AN IMAGE TO PROTECT!! LET HIM HARASS IN PEACE!! HE'S GOTTEN AWAY WITH IT FOR SO LONG, HE'S EARNED THE PRIVILEGE OF NOT HAVING TO DEAL WITH THE CONSEQUENCES OF HIS ACTIONS! WHY WON'T SOMEBODY TAKE UP FOR THESE POOR MILLIONAIRE ABUSERS!?!?!?!?
|by Anonymous||reply 6||12/04/2017|
Yes, I do disagree. I think Oliver is cute.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||12/04/2017|
That reminds me, how old was Shoshanna Lowenstein when she met Jerry Seinfeld
|by Anonymous||reply 8||12/04/2017|
I had no idea. Well I sort of did. I think I said something but then I think I retracted or clarified it. Anyway see The Post and vote #4!
|by Anonymous||reply 9||12/04/2017|
Oliver has gone full retard..."You’ve given no evidence to show that it didn’t happen." Someone needs to tell him how the justice systems works in the US.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||12/04/2017|
Is Oliver documented?
|by Anonymous||reply 11||12/04/2017|
I wouldn't be surprised if sexual misconduct allegations surface about John Oliver, the rumors/whispers are out there...
|by Anonymous||reply 12||12/05/2017|
Really, r12? Let's have some sort of detail on that claim... a link, a story, anything.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||12/05/2017|
Wag the Dog was a shitty movie, as well, never got the hype.
|by Anonymous||reply 14||12/05/2017|
In that article, Oliver sounds like a jerk trying to get attention for himself & Hoffman sounds like a reasonable man.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||12/05/2017|
R12 I haven't heard that before.
I'm not comfortable with what Oliver did, but Hoffman came off pretty badly imo. That said, I am seeing a lot people saying, in all seriousness, that people should be treated as guilty until proven innocent and I am not okay with that at all.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||12/05/2017|
I love John Oliver. His show is great.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||12/05/2017|
Didn't he grab Meryl's boob as soon as he met her? How is Tootsie, a role, proof of his character?
|by Anonymous||reply 18||12/05/2017|
The rumors about Hoffman have been around for years and years. Expose it! No one gets a pass, and this includes the women.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||12/05/2017|
Was the crowd well-heeled?
|by Anonymous||reply 20||12/05/2017|
Hoffman was notorious for sexually assaulting himself in his trailer during the filming of TOOTSIE.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||12/05/2017|
From what I can tell on the video, Oliver kept going because Hoffman just kept coming up short on his responses. It's not as if Oliver laid trap after trap and Hoffman just kept falling into them. Oliver was only trying to get straight, honest responses; Hoffman didn't do himself any favours by persisting on defending the indefensible. That tangent about Tootsie was desperate, embarrassing, and did not ring true at all.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||12/05/2017|
Oliver was amazing.
Fuck yourself, OP.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||12/05/2017|
And, yes, I think Oliver is hot as fuck. I love men who believe in what's good and true, and are not afraid to stand up for their beliefs. He's not Colbert-hot, but then who is?
|by Anonymous||reply 24||12/05/2017|
Guilt or innocence only resides in a court of law. The court of public opionion is a whole nuther kettle of fish. So enough with the innocent until proven guilty nonsense which the guilty always use to deflect.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||12/05/2017|
Right, R25. But the time factor around these allegations prevents many from seeking justice. The alleged perps' counted on the statute of limitations and the complicit silence of those who financially benefited. Sometimes the court of public opinion is all you have. I do agree with you that this is a dangerous tactic. Hopefully this situation will convince people currently being harassed and abused to report it, immediately, to both HR and law enforcement.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||12/05/2017|
At this point, only Chris Hayes would shock me.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||12/05/2017|
Hoffman admitted to participating in the humorous gang rape of his brother's girlfriend. He told the heartwarming story to Playboy in 2009. He said the girl was in a back bedroom at a party, being visited by different guys. Not one to pass up such an opportunity, he took a turn. When he went in, she called him by his brother's name and he pretended to be his brother. Of course, if she really thought that she was fucking his older brother, I'm pretty sure she was extremely intoxicated. So, fair game. When someone opened the door, letting light shine on Dustin's face, the girl screamed! It was hilarious!!! As Hoffman explained, she was a total "nymphomaniac." He lamented that you can't say that anymore about women. Nymphomaniac. Sad. Of course, he should get a pass on using that word since he acquired such tremendous insight into female sexuality from from wearing makeup and heels on the set of Tootsie. So there. Shame on you, John Oliver. And you're not even hot!
|by Anonymous||reply 28||12/05/2017|
OH FUCK, R28. Good actor, better liar, fucking raping pervert.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||12/05/2017|
Gross. Good for John Oliver
|by Anonymous||reply 30||12/05/2017|
Years ago Hoffman harassed someone I know. She worked on a film he was in.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||12/05/2017|
OP's thread is so fucking dumb. "I don't like the way John Oliver looks, so how dare he!!111!!"
|by Anonymous||reply 32||12/05/2017|
R25, employment law is civil and you can be fired for behavior that does not rise to a criminal charge. So Matt, Spacey, and Levine? Civil law. No criminal charges needed to dismiss them. No criminal charges needed to discuss civil allegations.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||12/05/2017|
[quote]Didn't he grab Meryl's boob as soon as he met her?
Yeah, and slapped her during Kramer vs. Kramer because he didn't think she was giving a good enough performance and needed "help."
Plus there have been perv rumors about him for years and years. The creepy OP and others saying "yeah but John Oliver LOOKS like a perv" are fucking ridiculous. Actual documented examples of inappropriate behavior? Doesn't mean anything. "Looks" like a perv? THE MOTHERFUCKER'S GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY. People are such goddamned idiots nowadays.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||12/05/2017|
"Ambush" LOL. Did Hoffman and that Deadline writer forget what the movie Wag the Dog was about?
|by Anonymous||reply 35||12/05/2017|
[quote] The court of public opionion is a whole nuther kettle of fish.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||12/05/2017|
Don't forget r34 - he'd also "helped" her by bringing up Cazale's recent death in rather wretched ways.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||12/05/2017|
Translation = Dragging someones name through the mud and ruining their reputation and livelihood is perfectly okay even if there is no way to prove if the allegations are true or not. However, posting fake news on Facebook is not OK if it influences the election? Why not if we're going by the court of public opinion?
Why is it we never hear about cases where the accused is absolved of any wrongdoing but their alleged crimes are plastered all over the news. Once accused, the taint of suspicion never leaves. John Oliver is in a position of influence so people will believe whatever he has to say without investigating it further. It's totally irresponsible.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||12/05/2017|
Not if it's true, R38. Get a grip. The taint of suspicion always finds someone else.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||12/05/2017|
MeToo is a Scientology type cult.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||12/05/2017|
Katherine Ross has now said he grabbed her breast during filming the graduate. On phone so can't link. He sure has fixed his looks with all the plastic surgery he has used to stop aging. Sure doesn't look like an older version of the guy in the graduate.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||12/05/2017|
How long before a scandal comes up to taint John Oliver? Sanctimonious pommie twits have always been closet Jew-haters deep down. Comes from hanging around with Arabs.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||12/05/2017|
This is a witch hunt against Jews and against men.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||12/05/2017|
r16, you haven't heard anything about Oliver because r12 is making up shit.
r42, how long before the scandal comes up to your taint?
|by Anonymous||reply 44||12/05/2017|
#believemen? Why? Most are lying, unstable bitches.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||12/05/2017|
Here's a video of some of it:
who is the woman in the middle?
Robert De Niro is the guy sitting next to Oliver.
|by Anonymous||reply 46||12/05/2017|
Producer Jane Rosenthal, r46.
|by Anonymous||reply 47||12/06/2017|
Michael (who?) Rappaport:
[quote]This Motherfucka John Oliver calling Dustin Hoffman “Dustin” Motherfucka you address this man as Mr.Hoffman. You came to moderate a discussion about a movie #JohnOliver, you selfish fuck,you ruined paying customers evening out in Manhattan
Unfortch, Ron Perlman got involved as well:
[quote]Dude’s got a point. And I particularly loved how he kept saying “I hate to do this, but..” Dude, you LIVE to do this. Cutting people down gets you hard!
They are both dead to me.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||12/06/2017|
Surely we've got past the point of thinking that someone "looks like a pervert"? Obviously not. One of the reasons why "nice" men can have a nice long pervert career.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||12/06/2017|
I agree with Rappaport and Perlman. If Oliver wants to go after every sexist actor pig in Hollywood, he's going to be a very busy man.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||12/06/2017|
R48 What a stupid headline. Rappaport and Perlman are 100% correct. Asking someone to prove they didn't do something or claiming to have firsthand knowledge or something that happened over 30 years ago even though you weren't there are the very definition of a witch hunt. Oliver lost whatever little credibility he had left. I'm no longer interested in anything he has to say.
|by Anonymous||reply 51||12/06/2017|
Alec Baldwin weighs in as well. The swines stick together, as per usual.
[quote]Alec Baldwin complains that John Oliver has turned talk shows into “grand juries”
|by Anonymous||reply 52||12/06/2017|
R51 Meryl said he groped her and another poster posted about how he admitted himself he pretended to be his brother while fucking someone. He's scum. Stop with this witch hunt shit. Get new idols.
|by Anonymous||reply 53||12/06/2017|
I think the NYT, the Post, Vanity Fair have done a responsible job reporting on this issue. It can probably be argued they have not always been responsible but they are now. This exchange is an example of irresponsible behavior that does more harm than good. At one point Oliver criticizes Hoffman for not proving it didn't happen. A feat that is next to impossible.
If Oliver wants to be taken seriously as something other than a comedian I suggest he needs to act accordingly. "Prove it didn't happen" is something I expect from Rush Limbaugh.
|by Anonymous||reply 54||12/06/2017|
I agree with Alec Baldwin, Harvey Weinstein, and Woody Allen. This has gone too far.
|by Anonymous||reply 55||12/06/2017|
Doesn't Oliver have some rumors behind him? He might look like Lauer interviewing O Reilly quite soon.......
|by Anonymous||reply 56||12/06/2017|
Only what you keep trying to make up r56.
|by Anonymous||reply 57||12/06/2017|
Oh the irony: everyone bitching about a witch hunt and "what about false allegations?" keep lying about what's been said and done.
R51 "Asking someone to prove they didn't do something or claiming to have firsthand knowledge or something that happened over 30 years ago even though you weren't there are the very definition of a witch hunt."
No he didn't and no he didn't. Oliver's comments about Hoffman not proving it didn't happen were in response to Hoffman's statement that what he did didn’t reflect who he is as a person. Oliver's point was "you did this, you didn't deny it, you're just trying to cop out by saying don't judge me for it."
Oliver's EXACT words, talking about Hoffman's "I am sorry. It is not reflective of who I am" comment:
“It’s that part of the response to this stuff that pisses me off. It is reflective of who you were. You’ve given no evidence to show that it didn’t happen. There was a period of time when you were a creeper around women. It feels like a cop-out to say, ‘Well, this isn’t me.’ Do you understand how that feels like a dismissal?”‘
See? He's not saying "you must PROVE it didn't happen." He's saying Hoffman's response amounts to "don't judge me" while Hoffman's not even saying or proving it's not true.
Taking people's words out of context and misrepresenting them is the very definition of a witch hunt.
|by Anonymous||reply 58||12/06/2017|
R56 No, Oliver has zero rumours behind him. He married the first woman who gave him attention (an Iraq War veteran), and they had their first child two years ago. That's literally all there is to him.
|by Anonymous||reply 59||12/06/2017|
"He married the first woman who gave him attention"
The awesome thing about John Oliver is he probably wouldn't deny that or even get defensive. He'd be like "Of course, just look at me. I know where I fall on the food chain."
|by Anonymous||reply 60||12/06/2017|
[quote] #believemen? Why? Most are lying, unstable bitches.
In the majority of cases I'll take a gay man's word over some lying homophobic breeder cunt any day of the week. I'm tired of being forced to believe the negative traits about my own sex are the default or that they define me.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||12/06/2017|
R61's head explodes whenever a gay man accuses another man of abuse/assault.
|by Anonymous||reply 62||12/06/2017|
Don't call yourself a feminist or a gay ally if you'd rather attack a woman than admit when a man is right.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||12/06/2017|
[quote][R61]'s head explodes whenever a gay man accuses another man of abuse/assault.
Heterosexuality is inherently abusive therefore they have no right to define what constitutes abuse.
|by Anonymous||reply 64||12/06/2017|
^ yeah, OK. Ask the Anti-Violence Project then.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||12/06/2017|
[quote]Don't call yourself a feminist or a gay ally if you'd rather attack a woman than admit when a man is right.
R63 - could you please diagram your post since I think I agree with you but the wording gives me serious doubts.
|by Anonymous||reply 66||12/06/2017|
R60 Yeah, even when writing that, I knew he could take it. He makes fun of his own appearance all the time on his show. And I've always found him sexy because of that.
|by Anonymous||reply 67||12/06/2017|
Hoffman wasn't exactly going to go into an interview where he knew he would be approached with these questions, so Oliver took the opportunity to confront him.
Considering what we actually know, from Streep and Ross as well as Hoffman's own words, I don't think it was inappropriate in the least.
Disappointing to see people like Ron Perlman act like there's some kind of sanctity at a movie reunion show that should not be violated. People said the same thing about Polanski and that awards ceremony he was arrested at. Bullshit, all of it.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||12/06/2017|
Wag the Dog is about a President faking a war to distract from getting caught creeping on an underage girl. How utterly fucking stupid must Hoffman be to not expect the subject to come up?
|by Anonymous||reply 69||12/06/2017|
R65: Yeah, I'll ask them what makes heterosexual men think they have the right to treat women and gay men as second-class citizens while we get punished for challenging it in any way shape or form.
|by Anonymous||reply 70||12/06/2017|
This is what I will never understand or respect about heterosexual men of any race, religion or nationality: why they go after women they can't have and ignore men they could have if they'd only just ask.
|by Anonymous||reply 71||12/06/2017|
I almost said that to Perlman on Twitter, R69, then decided to just keep my mouth shut because I didn't want the crazies coming after me.
But yeah, a Wag the Dog reunion is the PERFECT time to bring it up.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||12/06/2017|
John Oliver is just another racist pretentious goysplaining Brit douchebag, and if he's heterosexual then he, too, has forfeited any kind of benefit of the doubt and should be assumed guilty of rape even after proven innocent.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||12/06/2017|
He can do penance with a movie about the lynching of Leo Frank at the hands of racist white gentiles descended from Englishmen who along with Italians, French, and Spanish, stole land from Indians.
|by Anonymous||reply 74||12/06/2017|
Oh, and Portugal.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||12/06/2017|
This whole thread is a great illustration of the dishonest, amoral, manipulative and down right hysterical bullshit women have to deal with every day.
|by Anonymous||reply 76||12/06/2017|
As if gay men don't have to deal with it, too? First we get automatically assumed to be predators because we're gay, now we're automatically assumed to be predators because we're male. That ends right now.
|by Anonymous||reply 77||12/06/2017|
Both of these men benefit from the same heterosexual privilege heterosexual women benefit from.
|by Anonymous||reply 78||12/06/2017|
Did Oliver really think he'd get to the bottom of it by ambushing and haranguing Hoffman?
Pure virtue signal img from Oliver -- he was just polishing his own brand. And this is from someone who believes Hoffman's accusers.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||12/06/2017|
If I never hear another whiner use the term "virtue signalling" again, it'll be too soon. Enough already.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||12/06/2017|
The term was invented because it's relevant in the age of social media, in which people say things to define themselves, rather than because they believe them. If you want to disagree with that, do proceed, but if you're just "tired of it," well....
|by Anonymous||reply 81||12/06/2017|
Preach r80. Right-wing idiots collectively got obsessed with the word "virtue-signaling" and are determined to run it into the ground.
|by Anonymous||reply 82||12/06/2017|
It irritated me when Hoffman was talking about Tootsie and how when he was in character he was introduced to certain men who looked right through her because they weren't attracted to her and how much it upset him about how men were and how he had always been.
OK - here comes a Gurl, please...because
WOMEN DO THAT ALL THE FUCKING TIME AS WELL.
They'll look right through and dismiss a man for not being attractive in a New York second.
and they often enjoy doing it.
enjoy abusing their sexual power to make a man feel like shit about himself.
It's NOT just a male thing.
|by Anonymous||reply 83||12/06/2017|
I'm neither rightwing nor an idiot, r82. If you think we shouldn't fight back against the excesses of the loony Left (which put trump in power), then you're probably part of the problem -- you're just Steve Bannon's useful idiot.
|by Anonymous||reply 84||12/06/2017|
r74 Leo Frank was guilty of raping and murdering Mary Phagan, his 13 year old sweatshop employee.
Then Leo Frank's wealthy NYC Jewish friends bribed the governor of Georgia into blocking Leo's death sentence.
It's the same kind of Jewish crap that we're seeing today, with mensches like Harvey Weinstein. Leo Frank even employed an army of private investigators to alter the crime scene, and pressure witnesses. Just like Harvey Weinstein hired Jewish Mossad operatives to pressure victims and get fictitious narratives published in the media about how Weinstein was innocent, and being persecuted by racist gentiles.
|by Anonymous||reply 85||12/06/2017|
Oh dear, Matt's off his meds again.
|by Anonymous||reply 86||12/06/2017|
If you look like a perv you can’t criticize sexual harrassment.
Logic by Datalounge. You can’t make this shit up.
|by Anonymous||reply 87||12/06/2017|
Wherever antisemites go, other forms of bigotry are sure to follow.
|by Anonymous||reply 88||12/06/2017|
Just because you have a cunt doesn't give you an excuse to act like one.
|by Anonymous||reply 89||12/06/2017|
I love Michael Rappaport. Does this mean I have to stop listening to his podcast?
He usually is an unvarnished truth teller.
|by Anonymous||reply 90||12/06/2017|
[quote]If you think we shouldn't fight back against the excesses of the loony Left (which put trump in power)
|by Anonymous||reply 91||12/06/2017|
[quote]I love Michael Rappaport. Does this mean I have to stop listening to his podcast? He usually is an unvarnished truth teller.
Well, he's not a good breaker-upper:
[quote][bold]Michael Rapaport Sentenced for Harassment[/bold]
[quote]Michael Rapaport, known for his edgy, eccentric portrayals onscreen, is in trouble for some some real-life rude behavior.
[quote]In a case of love-gone-bad Hollywood-style, the 28-year-old actor has admitted in court to harassing ex-girlfriend Lili Taylor. The thick-accented Rapaport, whose credits include Cop Land, Mighty Aphrodite, Beautiful Girls and Higher Learning, pleaded guilty to aggravated harassment in a New York courtroom Monday. He told the judge he called Taylor 21 times in four days after they split up. Then, on May 17, 1997, he showed up at Taylor's apartment at 1 a.m. and repeatedly banged on her window.
[quote]He was arrested the following day, after Taylor (Ransom, Short Cuts, Mystic Pizza), 30, complained to police that he ignored her requests to leave. She claimed Rapaport said he wanted "to get back with" her and that his actions left her "seriously annoyed." New York Supreme Court Justice Arlene Goldberg issued a protection order that forces Rapaport to keep away from Taylor. Although he was spared jail time, the actor was ordered to seek counseling twice a month for a year.
|by Anonymous||reply 92||12/06/2017|
[quote]If you think we shouldn't fight back against the excesses of the loony Left (which put trump in power)
Yeah, you're an idiot.
|by Anonymous||reply 93||12/06/2017|
[quote]I love Michael Rappaport. Does this mean I have to stop listening to his podcast? He usually is an unvarnished truth teller.
And he's a Chris Brown apologist:
[quote]Aziz Ansari hosted “Saturday Night Live” a day after Donald Trump’s inauguration and poked fun at the 45th president by comparing him to Chris Brown.
[quote]“I’m sure there’s a lot of people who voted for Trump the same way a lot of people listen to the music of Chris Brown, where it’s like, ‘Hey, man! I’m just here for the tunes,” Ansari joked. “‘I don’t know about that other stuff. I just like the dancing and the music. I don’t condone the extracurriculars.’”
[quote]“The Parks and Recreation” alum was called out by Brown in an Instagram post and was also slammed by actor Michael Rapaport on his latest episode of “I Am Rapaport Stereo Podcast.”
[quote]“Aziz Ansari, who the f*ck do you think you are?” said the actor. “Why are you dragging him [Chris Brown] through the mud? Who are you to talk about him?’”
[quote]Rapaport continued by adding that no one supports the beating of women, but defended Brown by saying, “This guy has obviously suffered, you see all the trouble he has and all the trouble that surrounds him. He’s definitely dealing with some sh*t and dealing with his own personal demons.” The “Sully” actor didn’t stop there, criticizing the comedian for being “holier-than-thou.”
[quote]“But Aziz Ansari, you are one of these holier-than-thou political correct police,” he said. “This little f*ck. Mr. Racial, he’s like Mr. Provocative… He’s like, ‘Oh, the brown people this.’ He’s always talking about the brown people and I get that he tries to be racially provocative. He is racially provocative… I said this once and I’ll say it again.”
[quote]“F*ck you, you little politically correct f*ck, you. I’m not saying he’s not funny. I’m not saying he’s not talented. And I’m not saying his voice isn’t warranted, but you are not holier than thou,” he added.
|by Anonymous||reply 94||12/06/2017|
Jesus, Rapaport sounds like an enormous fucking asshole.
|by Anonymous||reply 95||12/06/2017|
Rapaport is a fucking asshole.
|by Anonymous||reply 96||12/06/2017|
John Oliver is our friend.
Bill Maher is not our friend.
|by Anonymous||reply 97||12/06/2017|
SOMEONE, PLEASE, I BEG OF YOU, BREITSHART IN MY MOUTH!!!!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 98||12/06/2017|
R97 What the hell are you talking about and what is it in reference to?
|by Anonymous||reply 99||12/06/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 100||12/06/2017|
R58 That's right. Hoffman apologized to those women and explained how it was wrong. He said it doesn't reflect the person he is. You can choose to believe him or don't believe him. I've read the accounts and made up my own mind. I feel he did act inappropriately but did not engage in any criminal conduct. I believe he has changed his outlook since then as he hasn't been involved in any public scandals and has led a fairly private life. Oliver shouldn't speak for Hoffman's accusers. If he has a beef with Hoffman, then it was the wrong choice to have him moderate a panel with Hoffman in it. Of course, Hoffman will defend himself as we all would. Hoffman has apologized for what he did. He doesn't have to apologize too for what he didn't do.
|by Anonymous||reply 101||12/06/2017|
"Hoffman apologized to those women and explained how it was wrong."
Never once heard him say either one of those things in the interview. If he had this would all be a footnote instead of something that is looking like it will be the end cap to his career.
All I got from Hoffman was, "I WASN'T WRONG" because.... Because it was way back when. Because I was only kidding. Because the crew is a family...blah, blah, blah.
It's no surprise to me that the "never apologize" types can never admit the error of their ways because EGO!!! EGO!!! EGO!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 102||12/06/2017|
Having Ron Perlman defend Hoffman is not a feather in Dustin’s cap. Didn’t Revlon’s Ron Perlman abuse or torment Ellen Barkin? These creeps stick together: Ron, Michael R., Geraldo.
|by Anonymous||reply 103||12/06/2017|
I wonder why Anne Heche wasn't invited to be on the panel.
|by Anonymous||reply 104||12/06/2017|
Ah R104- I forgot Anne was in that movie...and had a nice sized role.
|by Anonymous||reply 105||12/06/2017|
Is she still denying being a big old lesbian?
|by Anonymous||reply 106||12/06/2017|
Anne Heche? Thought she was dead. Like this thread.
|by Anonymous||reply 107||12/06/2017|
she's been with James Tupper for 10 years r106 so I guess so.
|by Anonymous||reply 108||12/06/2017|
Heche as perhaps the biggest role in the film. As I remember she's in more of the film than either Hoffman or De Niro.
She was quite hot there for a moment in the film world. She also did Donnie Brasco this year.
|by Anonymous||reply 109||12/06/2017|
R92 In all fairness, Rappaport was 28 when he harassed Lili Taylor, and he is around 47 now. I think he has probably changed his methods of conducting relationships in the nearly 20 years which have passed.
I can certainly see why some would say he seems like an asshole. He is an asshole, but he is a likeable asshole to me. I am a big sports fan, and I love his take on the NBA(which is a major part of his podcast.) Many people thought David Letterman was an asshole as well, but I have never before or since he retired ever had someone to make me laugh and think like he does.
|by Anonymous||reply 110||12/06/2017|
Donnie Brasco...that classic.
|by Anonymous||reply 111||12/06/2017|
Oliver is a hypocrite. He remained silent about Louis CK even though many female comedians had publicly said that he had exposed himself and masturbated in front of them.
|by Anonymous||reply 112||12/06/2017|
R112 he would be a hypocrite if he had Louis on, knew it was true, and didn't say anything. Who cares anyway if he's a hypocrite? The questions should be asked
|by Anonymous||reply 113||12/06/2017|
He remained silent about Louis CK even though many female comedians had publicly said that he had exposed himself and masturbated in front of them.
What a load of bullshit. And you've posted this kind "WHY DIDN'T SO AND SO SAY THIS ABOUT SUCH AND SUCH" on a ton of threads as though that means anything.
Twitter bullshit to the contrary, it's not a moral imperative for one celebrity to comment on anything and everything going on with another celebrity.
|by Anonymous||reply 114||12/07/2017|
I love Anne. She's the best we've got - & what a loony/character she is.
I remember when she wrote her autobiography - she was doing the rounds & BOOOM >> 9/11.
So she never got to promote it properly.
|by Anonymous||reply 115||12/07/2017|
You're probably wondering if I read the book.
I couldn't get through it.
I'll give it another chance.
|by Anonymous||reply 116||12/07/2017|
& she called her kid ATLAS.
YOU do the math.
|by Anonymous||reply 117||12/07/2017|