**OFFICIAL** Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Wedding Spring 2018

I hope Sarah gets invited. She should. She lives with Andrew. Harry is friendly with his cousins. Beatrice and Eugenie, who will be invited. Don't be a dick like William and not invite Sarah leaving her at home. It's not going to kill Harry to invite Sarah. And Harry has spent time at Sarah and Andrew's ski lodge in Switzerland.

Her clothes are always much too tight and she needs industrial-strength Spanx.

Does she really live in the same house as Andrew? I heard that he let her stay at his place, he wasn't there a lot or he had a separate wing or something, but that was 20 years ago. I think it's something people keep repeating but it's not true anymore. Same as "they're waiting for Prince Philip to die before they remarry." Not gonna happen.

I can see it now. Fourth bottle of pink champagne and Fergs "is off to the races" as they say.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Any fashion advice for Meghan as she reads her Princess-In-Training manual?

R1 Harry will invite the relatives he's told to invite, just as his brother did.

According to The Sunday Times the royal siblings Prince George and Princess Charlotte have been confirmed as bridesmaid and pageboy for the nuptials of their Uncle Harry to Meghan Markle in May next year.

Andrew. Yes, I keep forgetting about him. (And count myself lucky to have that privilege) Let's hope they keep him well-chaperoned. Revolting man. Stay away kids.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Yeesh, Sarah's looking ROUGH! I think it's funny how the hissing, snapping brits are tearing into Meghan's looks. She's a stunning supermodel compared to 99.9% of British women.

R9 Geez, let's hope he puts some decent clothes on for the ceremony...

How many threads do we need about this woman?????

Meghan will ship her Dad off to a "Health and Rejuvenation Resort" for the next 5 1/2 months. No way he'll be slim as Philip but......he obviously is in desperate need of a "polishing up."

R10 I thought the straight, white teeth were veneers. No?

Wait till Kate's Uncle Gary slugs Duchess Meghan in the chops one night in a drunken rage. See how many porcelain bits are left on the sidewalk, then you'll know how many veneers, r14.

R13 you could send my dad to one of those spas and he'd break out. He would just ask the designer to make him a bigger suit and get over it. No ones looking at him anyway, would be his argument.

Fat old guys don't care. So good luck to Meghan.

Buck Palace is in charge now, r16. "On Her Majesty's Orders" overrides everything. Watch William being publicly scolded by the Queen.

I understand that r17 but I don't think the Queen cares one iota how bad the Americans look. Her staff won't be asking any of them to lose weight. If they want to waddle into the Church, that's Meghan's problem.

R17 Oh the horror, the horror!!! Seriously... if that’s the most grandma has to criticize, that’s not bad.

But that dirty look the queen gave william was hilarious.

"Ew, ew, who squats down to speak with their children. What are we? The help? Ew"

Exactly, r20. One does have one's priorities, after all.

I don't think Sarah will be invited. At the time of her death, Diana wasn't even speaking to Sarah. All because Sarah said she caught warts from borrowing Diana's shoes.

If Charles has any say and he might ......there's no way Andrew or Sarah will be invited. At least Sarah. By May, God forbid, Phillip might be gone leaving the Queen alone and dependant entirely on Charles for everything.

I’m growing quite fond of the Sarah Ferguson troll who manages to force the dreadful woman into every single thread about the Royals.

Fergie wasn't invited to William and Kate's huge wedding at the Abbey and she won't to Harry' smaller one at St George's which holds half the capacity. She isn't close to either of them and is no longer a relative.

Now whether Andrew ups and remarries her next spring after Will and Kate's new sprog is born is a better topic to debate. Andrew will fall out of the top six in line of succession and will no longer need the Queen's approval to wed.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

If they can help it the royals don't air their dirty laundry so Andrew will be invited, regardless of whatever he is doing now to embarrass the Queen. They won't invite Sarah for a few reasons, the first being she's the ex wife of the sixth in line to the throne so she's just not important enough, regardless of how well she gets along with Andrew or Harry. But she really burned her bridge when she tried to sell access to Andrew for £500,000 in 2010. Nail in the coffin right there.

Even though it was a coons piracy between Sarah and Andrew, r27 to sell access? Remember it was Andrew who rigged the scheme to sell access to Buck Palace only a few weeks ago.

The Beckham blew it by posting photos of their kids dressed up in vintage princess costumes on their Instagram. Andrew had to quickly come up with a plausible story that these celebrity kids (including Paul McCartney's grandchildren) only had access to his - Prince Andrew's office.

The deceit is neverending either those two - Andrew and Sarah. Always trying to make a quick buck.

While we're on this topic - Andrew is in DM'S headlines today saying he's the Royal Family's "Ideas Factory" when it comes to commercial investment concepts.

Andrew and Sarah concocted that original access to himself scheme / scandal. They're thick as thieves those two.

"conspiracy"

Oh no doubt r28, but he's protected and she isn't. So she takes the fall.

Correct, r30. But his hands are dirty.

A British journalist on CNN stated that it was HIGHLY UNLIKELY that White Supremicist Donald and his fascistic racist former hooker wife would receive invitations to the Wedding. I eagerly anticipate the snub when Javanka’s goes missing too!

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I hope not r32, especially because he'd expect an invitation and will be highly offended if he doesn't receive one. Which will be hilarious. And he won't take it graciously either. He'll rant on twitter and try to put a pox on the marriage.

By the time the May Wedding rolls around, Trump will be so knee deep in his own excrement, that a royal wedding snub will be the least of his concerns.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Have the paps stalked him there? That's rude. I assume everyone in her family is fair game now that she's marrying a Prince. Poor things.

Half her family have already sold stories and/or pictures to the tabloids. No need to pity them.

I can't exactly picture Tom Markle in a morning suit sipping champagne at the pre-reception at Windsor Castle. Is it me?

Not her dad r41.

Kensington Palace courtiers have probably told Prince Philip that Harry is engaged to:

Princess Madeleine: 28. Third in line to the Swedish throne. An equestrian rider who is recently single after allegations of infidelity ended her engagement.

R44 - Madeleine is already married with two children. Oops.

That hussy!

I bet my life they haven't told Philip she's half African American. Then they'll just try to keep him away from anyone more than slightly olive skinned at the wedding because he's guaranteed to say something like "in my day that girl wouldn't even be allowed to work in the kitchens!" within earshot of Meghan's mother.

I'm seeing a marvelous Shakespearean tragedy ahead.

Okay, second runner-up for Harry r45 and she's a German Princess! Philip will do cartwheels guaranteed. They can put her photo all around the palaces and bring in look alikes to meet Philip.

Princess Elisabeth: 29. Princess of the German Thurn und Taxis. A jet-setting socialite who works as a writer and editor in London.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Sarah always wears dresses which accentuate her gunt, she could look much more flattering if she didn’t try to squeeze into such tight things.

I doubt she’ll get an invite, it would be too awkward considering she’s an ex.

He did lighting for General Hospital and some prime time show. She spent time on the sets when growing up.

The media needs to leave the man alone.

Bet Meghan is doing cartwheels over it, r50. She's being Mortanized.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

May19th is the Wedding Date.

Look for May 19, 2018 to be the date Trump opens the new London Embassy.

So who will perform at The Wedding Reception? Ellie Goulding sang Elton John's Your Song at William and Kate's.

^^^ I bet Ed Sheeran.

I was about to write that, r59. But which song?

Plane and hotel are booked. I'll be there for this once in a life time American/British wedding celebration.

Sarah still dresses in the worst styles of the 80s. Her and Andrew’s young heifers sure are hard on the eyes.

Meghan’s dad mayclean up decently. Professional grooming of his beard and a well tailored suit and good shoes can work wonders.

What the hell are they going to do with Prince Philip?

R61 You better be reporting to DL everything you experience!

Song to rock on at the wedding reception. Rhianna. She knows Harry and would be happy to do him the favor.

Put him on the prince stand and wheel him about.

The Celebitches are collectively creaming their panties; further proof that "Third-Wave" feminists are truly just MRA's wet dreams.

The Sparkle former acquaintance keeps feeding me info, and even though I won't share the juicy parts, I almost feel like opening an account at Celebitchy to fuck with Frau Kaiser and her Frau-ettes, none of whom know Megs from a cunt hole, but seem to very sincerely think that Sparkle is the Second Coming of their Personal Mary Magdalene, La Jolie.

I just hope there isn't a funeral in the family before then.

I thought the British royal didn't get married in May because it was bad luck?

Does this meanHer Majesty not approve after all?

I don't think they had a choice, r69. There's all these events on the royal calendar. I found this link - from 2016 citing 2016 royal engagements. They were probably constrained by Kate's pregnancy and wanted it done well before summer break. So May it was.

R70, Awesome website. Thanks!

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

R67, Please spill! You're among friends... (And some of us would love to know!!!)

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

^^^there she is again with the black pantyhose. Either she thinks it’s a signature look, or she’s got fugly legs she’s trying to hide.

I'm sure Victoria Beckham was delighted to see Fergie's lumpy legs going bump bump bump down the funny stairs further accentuating the ill-suited VB mini-skirt.

Ed sang this song a day ago at Miss France 2018. Bet he sings this song at Harry and Meghan's reception.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Sorry but dat girl be one homely beeyatch. She must know how to make Harrys dick sing. This is the best he can do? She ugly black or white and her kiddy photos were scary ugly. Never heard of her before her sucking Harry's hairy dick, but she sho knows how to get in de dough. Well look at is dis way. One less ugly trollet to take away fine black mens from the rest of us.

She won't be wearing the outfit at r79. Not unless she's trying to kill the Queen.

An Israeli designer? Won't happen. The Beeb, The Guardian, The Independent, and Jeremy Corbyn would squeal in outraged indignance. To say nothing of what Brit Muslims would do.

She'll use an English designer to show her devotion to her new home and role.

R28, I prefer "coons piracy"! They DO like to pilfer!

Monster in law the queen has to approve the wedding gown length and no chest exposed.

Those sketches were supposedly approved for release / publication by the Palace.

But here's the style Meghan is really working on......

The shoes. A nod to the bride's "entertainment industry" roots.

You have all missed the major controversy over the wedding. It's on the same date as the football (soccer) finals. It would be like have the wedding in USA on the day of the super bowl... even more so. But I feel that the fans of Br. football would be different than fans for the wedding.

It's only the FA Cup and isn't it played in the evening? Wedding will be earlier.

This engagement is not like the others. Harry and Meghan posed for the obligatory photo op, did an interview and made one public appearance as an engaged couple and then - nothing. Miss Sparkle has disappeared. No one has seen her since the Nottingham appearance. It's like it never happened. What the hell has she been doing these last weeks?

Apparently she attended some Palace staff Christmas parties but interestingly enough. while paps got pics of Wills and Kate coming and going, nothing on the Sparkles.

She is being "tutored", r91.

Maybe she's getting a "makeover" from her long, lanky and straggly locks at the Engagement Photo Op to something more "stylish" like this befitting her new role.

And shoes that fit.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Meghan's legs are sticks without shape. But then, like any number of wealthy men, Harry wanted a skinny long-haired brunette.

R91, I think she’s pregnant. She did one public appearance after the engagement, then disappeared.

The baby will be born, she’ll starve herself before the wedding, then wear a baby bump for nine months after the wedding and give birth to a healthy, one year old baby!

Prince Harry just received a new military honor that previously was held by Prince Philip? Is this a big deal?

R100 - passing the torch to the younger generation. Philip is retired and the queen approved Harry as his replacement. I guess Charles and William have enough on their plates so she decided that the grandson who served in Afghanistan should get the honor.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Am I the only one who finds it strange that they're all driving there in separate cars? William, Kate, Harry, Meghan, and the Cambridge kids all live barely 2 miles away in Kensington Palace. Couldn't they all go in one big limo?

I notice she likes to show the ring. Even when pulling her hair away from her face, she does it in a very conscious way in order to show some diamond sparkle.

In theory they could have r102, but not surprised they went in separate vehicles.

Do you think the little kids sit at a different table at this luncheon, or do they sit at the big table with the Queen and everyone else?

Just wondering what the nanny does then. Does she eat in the kitchen?

The little kids probably sit elsewhere with their nannies. Maybe HM pops her head in for a quick greeting but I doubt they’re allowed to run amuck. Ca you imagine the withering looks of death from Princess Anne?

I also would like to know what they eat.

Did Andrew and Edward go?

Oh, and I'm disappointed they didn't get a nice picture of Lady Sarah Chatto, as she's my favorite.

[quote] What the hell has she been doing these last weeks?

She was in LA privately visiting her mother before the holidays. It was in all the papers.

I was hoping for a quick photo of Lady Sarah’s hot son.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Don't want to rain on anyone's parade but Enty of CDAN had a few shocking reveals re Sparkle in the last few weeks. Well not shocking for an actress on a night soap. Definitely not Royal Family photos and past behavior if the Blinds are at all true.

Spill, r113. And Link.

Seconding R114.

R111, I’ve read (here) that Anne and her husband have been separated for a while.

It's kind of obvious that Anne's relationship is on the rocks. Interesting how SM never says much - if anything about it.

Sarah is aging horribly!

That sketch at R79 is a joke, right?

It seems it would be less obvious if Anne's husband simply rode another car in, but the man is like, "Oh no, I'mma walk, and I'mma walk slowly so no one misses me"!

No joke, r79. DM looked at the supposed Palace -approved designs and then done one transposed the design onto a fake Markle body.

She's petite and short and I'm not all that surprised that she'd want something feminine (to her way of thinking), non-traditional and expressive of her personality.

I'm not shocked at all.

Blind Item #9, where most of the 55 guesses are MM

"Blind Item #9 CDAN Blind linked above Refers to "Deal or No Deal" There are more people coming forward who say this now former B+ list mostly television actress supplemented her income when she was starting out by meeting men for money and being a sugarbaby. She was not alone in that from this particular show where there were another dozen women who joined her supplementing their income. They used the little bit of fame the hit network show gave them to earn some extra money."

Blind Items Revealed #1 (test next post)

"Blind Items Revealed #1 October 17, 2017

Apparently there are several dozen nude photos of this alliterate B list mostly television actress from a long running cable show. Normally this would not be a big deal, but in this case it could be huge, especially if the plan for a specific website for the photos is put in place.

Meghan Markle POSTED BY ENT LAWYER AT 8:00 AM 84 COMMENTS "

In a side view, Harry's nose is just like the Red Setter's.

R126, And his hairline at the temples, his hair color (yeah, yeah, Charles Spencer, blah, blah), his teeth (no huge Windsor choppers, which his brother, aunt, uncles, and even his cousins all have),...

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Great photos! She’s a beautiful woman.

She looks like she’s wearing a see through dress in R128’s photo.

R129, looks like a jewelry advertisement. Even the turn of the collar. Lol!

Insta-ham feel.

The Harry and MeAgain photo setup you didn't see, r132. That version is on Harry's nightable.

Poor Harry.

What r132 said.

I'll be riveted on how she solves her wedding gown dilemma. It can't be sleeveless. It can't be strapless. ( And thank God or Satan for that. Why do brides who have no business being in a sleeveless/ strapless gown insist on it? ugh)

So then, how to avoid echoing Kate's wedding gown?

Easy, but it would take some daring on her part- Go with a sheath, NOT a ballgown. A sheath, however, takes height and I don't think Markle has it.

Forgot to add that it shouldn't be a stand alone sheath. Given the formality of the wedding it should be a two piece ensemble. It would need a bolero cut jacket or a longer, thigh length jacket, made from an exquisite spring/summer weight fabric.

Markle is tiny. And short. What looks great on a runway fashion model would make Smeg look like a munchkin. That's why I'm not surprised that the "Palace" revealed that design by Israeli designer at r80.

Than again, Me-Again has becomes fast buddies with Victoria Beckham. So Smegs could end up wearing something like this.

Meg's Honeymoon dress by VB.

Sounds like her dad "plans" to walk her down the aisle but actually has no idea if he's asked.

For all their love and reverence for their mom, and how they want her respected, neither William nor Harry married a woman remotely like her. She had short blonde hair, their wives have long flowing dark hair. She had blue eyes, their wives have brown eyes. She was 12 years or more younger than Charles; Kate is slightly older than William and Meghan is 3 years older than Harry. Kate's tall - that's the only commonality. While I think both Meghan and Kate are better looking than Camilla, it's like they did a do over and stuck with the experienced, more sophisticated peer as a spouse instead of going for an aristocrat. Of course it's also possible the aristocrats didn't want either of them. More fun not being in the family.

Isn't Meghan about 5'6"? I wouldn't necessarily count that as short. She's got long arms and legs which I guess make her look taller. I would have estimated her to be about 5'8".

She'll look tiny/short next to W,K, & H though.

R139, actually, I get damaged, neurotic vibe from Kate; I can see that there might be a psychological resemblance to Diana.

R132, Guess I'm not the only one who doesn't see a real tight connection between these 2 lovebirds. Definitely more than with Princesses Dianna and Kate Middleton had with their fiance's but still a little too posed vs natural, flowing chemistry. It's as if Central Casting matched them up based on what the job officially required rather than due to intense passion between them.

Then again many Hollywood marriages have the same look in the beginning and middle of the marriage. Seems off to me as a couple should be there for each other, rather than posing for the public. Much more believable if the couple ignored the general public watching them and concentrated only on their beloved so close besides them.

Would also work if we saw a pic of a twosome sharing a private joke, or a more intimate comment.

R136, Della I agree. Love the look of a bolero jacket for the actual ceremony which then can be taken off for dancing afterwards. I'm also 5'4" so well aware that many fashions can make me look "like I'm drowning in fabric."

I think they’re a fantastic couple and I wish them all the best!

7th pic down on 12/21/17 CDAN Blind Gossip page is another pic of the twosome. What do you think?

R127...

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

The hat looks like a poo emoji.

R147, You're right. She also should have angled the hat. It looks even worse placed incorrectly.

A better look for tiny Meghan. And she should lose the straggly hair and do something with it.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

I think Meghan might do well with a wrapper worn over her dress, like the Countess of Wessex wore at her wedding.

Damn, Harry’s bald spot is enormous! It’s on full display in the new pics of them going to church with HM.

Based on what I've seen so far of how Meghan dresses (straggly hair, crumply-looking blanket coats tied at the waist, ill-fitting shoes, loose boots, and dull, colorless, upside down salad bowl hats), I am not holding out for much of a dazzling gown or wedding get-up.

If she shows her legs, it will be guaranteed to be a total fashion disaster.

[quote] The deceit is neverending either those two - Andrew and Sarah. Always trying to make a quick buck.

She's his pimp. That's why he's kept her around all this time. She arranges the meetings and handles the money exchange. And when Andrew got caught selling access to Buckingham Palace, the courtiers said, the Beckhams were guests of Andrew and, "‘From time to time members of the Royal Family who reside at royal residences invite guests to visit privately.’

That little disclaimer was in case all the other various times Andrew rented out the Taxpayer's palace like it was Airbnb came to light. Make no damned mistake about it, Andrew has been renting out Buckingham palace to the rich and famous for a long time. That's how he was able to buy a 13 Million pound villa in Switzerland - and he put Fergie's name on it too. They are thick thieves. After the press reported on it, the Queen strong armed the press to drop the story

Yet Andrew made a big stink in the press a few months ago about having to call off Eugenie's wedding or engagement because Charles wanted Andrew to pay some costs to rehab the KP cottage Eug was going to move into (with Jack the pub manager).

I thought at the time Charles doesn't want Fergie anywhere near KP which is what would inevitably happen. Fergie would move right in (likely turn that space into more Airbnb opportunities) and within weeks, Eugene would start complaining about needing more room thus spreading the York tentacles even deeper onto KP property.

I'm surprised Charles hasn't moved the York sisters further away from public view. They seem to be playing bigger roles. Gaining greater visibility.

MM looks frumpy in the photo at r151. Ill-fitting and too-long coat, wrinkled boots, doofus hat, unflattering colors. Meanwhile, pregnant Catherine looks classy and trim.

Also, in the pictures of the foursome walking, she and Kate seem to avoid assiduously even glancing in the other's direction. Br-r-r-r!

"she" = Meghan.

Jeez. I mean r157.

At least Meghan is consistent, r157.

Those blanket style coats look great on tall models with nice legs and sophisticated hair styles.

Her stage 5 clinging is weird. The body language was especially off as she was clinging like mad to his arm and yet both his hands were slouched in his pockets.

Yes, her being photographed with having her arm around his has been commented upon ad nauseum. Some people like closeness and body contact, perhaps it's the influence from her mother. It may in fact be one of the things Harry loves about her, since he probably didn't have many hugs as a child due to the dry British upbringing.

r154 Meghan's got great style, look at her many outfits over the years. I am having a hard time seeing one that doesn't look great on her. I think you may be suffering from Markle Derangement Syndrome - I'd be surprised if she could wear anything you would approve of.

Agree, the clinging is weird, r162. Everyone keeps saying "She's an Actress!" so she can handle publicity, crowds, public pressure. Even Harry himself said he wanted someone with previous experience in the limelight.

Yeah right.

You sound unloved, r165

Now looking at it the coat is too long and boot is a little too casual for that event. She should have gone for a more fitted boot, slouchy boot is a no no. I just knew that she is just an overhyped media flavor in terms of look, style and career level. I never believed she was this confident feminist because if she were she would not have married into that family. By the way Kate coat and boot look well fitted minus the hat.

In other words, not Meghan, R161.

Meghan Markle always looks like a committee of drunken elves puts her outfits together. And shoves her out the front door.

R169 bullshit She looked fantastic at the church service. Kate looked like a doll you'd buy in Harrod's basement shop.

In the past year, has Harry gotten worse looking?

R170 = Meghan fanatic.

None of the Windsors gets better looking with age, r171. Charles if anybody, is one who seems to be decaying at a rapid rate (very red face, swollen hands, significant weight gain).

Just look at other aristocrats - some are just stunning. Earl George Percy, son of the Duke of Northumberland (linked) and his sister who is gorgeous are just two examples.

Well put, r167.

True to the strategy of the royal firm, Charles and his brood are front and center. Non-royal, unmarried Meghan is standing IN FRONT of Princesses of The Blood (Anne and the two Yorkies) as well as being several layers ahead of Edward and Sophie and their children.

As much as I like Meghan and some of her fashion, this coat looked too long on her, the boots too slouchy and casual, and the hat and bag calling to each other as too round. But I’m sure she’ll improve. Kate wasn’t much better. She was trying WAY too hard to look Christmassy and cheery in those cliche holiday colors and the bushy furry hat (late 1960s Queen Juliana/Queen Fabiola/Princess Grace style) didn’t flatter her. I’m glad she attempted a different hat though, I always think hats are usually Kate’s weakest fashion moments and I’m waiting for her to wear one with the same ease and style as Diana did.

Style.

Megan is not short like some of you are saying. She's about 5'6. Harry is 6'2, Wills is 6'3 and Kate is 5'10. So she only looks short next to them in comparison.

She's very oddly built. She gets compared to SpongeBob because she has a very square body with now very skinny legs. Her legs weren't always quite that scrawny but she went on the Windsor Fiance diet, I assume to try to thin out her middle, and all it did was make her legs even skinnier. Some have said her legs make her look like she has some kind of muscle wasting disease but her mid section is still wide in comparison. All of that makes those coats that tie at the waist unfortunate choices.

I am trying to imagine the design for her wedding gown that would be appropriately modest and at the same time flatter her odd figure. I think a tea length 1940s style might be nice, (it IS her second wedding after all...) but I don't think she'd go for that-not glam enough. I have a feeling that whatever she chooses, because of her thick middle there are going to be pregnancy rumors from day one. They started already but they'll just go into overdrive once they're actually married.

Kate is 5' 9" , r177. So, given that, I would say Meghan is 5' 6" max. She is very short compared to these 3 amazons.

Oh, Miss Sparkle is lapping up all of the attention. She even stuck her tongue out at the people lined up to greet the royals after the church service. If she spots a camera nearby, she never fails to look directly into it and flash her megawatt smile. What an actress! This woman is so full of herself I can only imagine how big her ego will get with years of royal privilege under her belt. She's going to become quite insufferable.

It seems like she has worn that slouchy boot before with harry. I guess she hasn't really gotten a royal budget for boots since she is not yet married to the firm. I don't want to hear people calling her a feminist because she is not one. Her self worth now is defined by who she is going to marry. She is nothing more now than a dependent golddigger whose identity is defined by the royal family.

[QUOTE] nothing more now than a dependent golddigger whose identity is defined by the royal family.

Like Kate

Sparkle, sticking out her tongue, upstaged everyone else.

R181

Since Kate's family is wealthy, she can't be considered a "dependent golddigger".

Am I invited to the wedding?

R156 I think Bea and Eugenie's problem is Fergie and, to a certain degree , Andrew . Fergie's unpredictable and if those two had a bigger role that it would come with Fergie drama attached to them .

[QUOTE] Since Kate's family is wealthy, she can't be considered a "dependent golddigger”

Since Meghan had a full-time job on a TV series she was hardly poor. Estimates vary but I’d say Town & Country is in the ballpark of Meghan already being a millionaire. Not a gold digger either.

She was a supporting character on a minor mid level cable tv show.

She ain't insanely rich.

Not insanely rich, but richer than a lot of Americans.

Sparkle is rich, I tells ya! RICH!!!

Kate is new money, as is Meghan. Kate is no aristocrat. Both hit the lottery in terms of mates.

By the way, I didn’t realize how many British DL readers there are. Because all this anti Meghan stuff about her being American can’t be coming from Americans.

If it is, get over yourselves you fat old queens.

Lol at the uptight Meghan fangurls...

Where are the dick pics fro Las Vegas? Someone besides random whores saw that thing. Full red bush? Big balls? Thick shaft? Washed?

Take that $450,000 a year, minus taxes, agent and management fees. Now also consider that her 'curated' wannabe Paltrow lifestyle could not have come cheap, I bet she was probably spending almost everything she was making.

No way she's a millionaire. Whoever keeps on linking to Town and Country or Celebrity Net Worth must be retarded. $5 million? Yeah fucking right.

And while the Middletons are new money for sure, they sure have a hell of a lot more than Meghan. The comparisons are laughable.

I’m not saying the Middleton’s didn’t make out extremely well with their party supply business, they’re worth a ton of money NOW. But unless I’m missing something, last time I checked having money doesn’t buy class, and in this case I mean class as in social position. If it did, most of you here wouldn’t be so hysterical over the Trump family.

Face it, Kate comes from a family with humble roots.

Face it, she’s no great beauty.

Face it, she didn’t go to church on Christmas Day with the royal family prior to her marriage.

What Kate does have is that she’ll someday be the queen consort to the king. However she’ll be a queen without the gentle touch, more Queen Mary than Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother. Meghan will be doing a lot of heavy lifting in terms of being the smiling face of the future monarchy.

Meghan has worked and earned her money even if its not millions. Kate has never worked in her life.

Lol!

Yes Meghan worked her whole life just to give it up. If she had such a successful acting career she won't have giving it up to marry into this cult of a family. This is her most important career, which is been harry wife. She is no different than Kate now but only difference is that Kate has the superior title. Both women identity is shaped through their husbands.

Yes, I know what you mean - I had to give up my extremely successful career in Hollywood to go slum in Monaco, r198.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

At least grace Kelly had an actual successful acting career and was well known prior to marrying the prince of monaco. I am sure when she abandoned her career people were shocked. We know how it all ended.

Kate's family of parvenus did not get rich selling $Dollar$ Store (Poundland in the UK) party tat. The speculation is that Uncle Gary, the wife beater, who made a lot of money in some kind of IT or headhunting startup, funded the rise of the Middletons. Since the Middletons' company is held in such a way that no one has access to their accounts, we will never know, so the myth of the Moneymaking Middletons continues.

Meghan was a supporting character in a cable show; she did not make bank. Far from being overworked, her SUITS' schedule would probably have been much more relaxed than that of her colleagues, as evidenced by the fact that she and Harry claim to have not spent more than two weeks apart in the last however long they were dating (which changes with each telling- why are they so coy about the details of their meeting)?

Meghan also hired a very pricy PR agency to get her into charity work, charity being an effective way to raise her profile as she aged out of acting (if one could call her making pouty faces and taking off her clothes "acting") and started her lifestyle brands and clothing line/ hunt for a very wealthy husband.

Meghan is not rich. At most, she might have a couple million in the bank, but given her OTT spending, even well before she snagged Dimmy, she's probably broke.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Her hybrid vigor can only improve their tainted family lineage.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

She is gaming the crown for when she emerges as a flawless Princess Henry, Duchess of Somefuck.

Agreed R204, as a proud Woman of Color Megs needs to go back to her natural 'Fro; it's time to make it popular again.

Can you imagine if the Afro became trendy again how much time and money would be saved? Following Princess Meghan's lead, hundreds of millions of women worldwide would regain valuable time and billions of dollars that they could spend for families and pursuing their dreams!

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Meghan needs a major makeover. Head to Toe. Needs a polishing up along these lines.

1. Get rid of plum pudding hats and ditch fascinated look unless you want to simulate UFO landings on your head. You are short. Choose hats that don't overwhelm your silhouette.

2. Realize you live in a damp windy climate and style hair accordingly (stragglers in your face resemble bedhair)

3. Dump floppy-around-your-ankles boots and invest in good leather boots

4. Cut your hair or get rid of extensions. Get a proper haircut.

5. Find a designer to fit your clothes so you don't show up with blanket-style coats tied hapzardly around waist.

6. Ditch showy high heels hung together with strings. Get a good pair of court shoes.

7. Stop hanging off Harry's arm in public. You're a supposedly well-known "actress" at least in your mind. Show some confidence.

8. Explore brighter colours. Navy. Brown. Black gets boring fast. White is not your colour - make you look like a chicklet. Discuss with a stylist.

9. Legs are not your strong suit. Pantsuits. Boots. Gowns, etc will be your wardrobe staples. Kate has the legs and will only make you look under-nourished or deformed in comparison.

10. Ditch the scarves wrapped around your neck like a neckbrace. You look like you're in the North Pole. Wear proper outdoor clothing and you won't feel the chill.

[QUOTE] if one could call her making pouty faces and taking off her clothes "acting"

Asshole. Her character wasn’t like that at all. She played a paralegal studying to get into Harvard. Always dressed.

You cunts criticizing her are Americans, I can tell because this board is overrun with #MAGA racist deplorables. It’s like a mushroom cloud of crap has descended on this world thanks to your orange leader.

"glamour model" is Brit for nudie model. Classy.

Britain's Royals are a mentally-ill and emotionally-damaged surplus of carbon. A guillotine, used humanely can put these unfortunate individuals out of their misery.

R209 she sounds like a DLer. And you have to admit, she was actually right about some things (specifically the "dumb little actress nobody has heard of" part).

This is an American board, R213

An American!

*clutches pearls*