Why isn't this cinematic masterpiece more fondly remembered?
Eldergays, tell me all about Exorcist II: The Heretic
by Anonymous | reply 59 | December 17, 2018 12:42 AM |
Did they intentionally hire Louise Fletcher because they thought that if they couldn't get Ellen Burstyn to return for the sequal they might as well get someone that everyone thinks is Ellen Burstyn?
by Anonymous | reply 1 | November 16, 2017 9:58 AM |
When I watched it, people openly booed, with many walking out of it after 15-20 minutes.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | November 16, 2017 10:42 AM |
James Earle Jones dressed as a bee was briliant.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | November 16, 2017 10:42 AM |
I love it. It is great fun to watch.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | November 16, 2017 10:52 AM |
The acting, Fletcher, Blair, Burton, Kitty Winn.... All are beyond terrible. Nothing scary ever happens. The premise is paper-thin. Cinematography is ugly. The ridiculous scene where Regan meets her possessed double (played by non-lookalike Eileen Dietz) plays like a comedy, and is just one of many awful set pieces. Direction is heavy handed and absurd. Dumb resolution. Unlikable characters. Wailing soundtrack that comes complete with YODELING.... Did I mention that I absolutely LOVE this movie as well?
by Anonymous | reply 6 | November 16, 2017 11:06 AM |
You bitches are heartless!
by Anonymous | reply 7 | November 16, 2017 11:11 AM |
It is a total laugh riot from the moment at the beginning when that latina sets herself on fire and does that wacky scream with the flames around her head.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | November 16, 2017 11:11 AM |
R2, I love how Regan just randomly mentions that she was possessed by a demon, as if it was the common cold.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | November 16, 2017 11:14 AM |
Cracks me up everytime I see it.
Here at 02:14...
by Anonymous | reply 10 | November 16, 2017 11:15 AM |
I never saw it.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | November 16, 2017 11:16 AM |
Some of the only redeeming features of this film were the aerial sequences of the demonic locust storm flying over Africa.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | November 16, 2017 11:20 AM |
Linda Blair was probably in her sluttiest phase during the filming of this movie.
She got some Grade A dick.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | November 16, 2017 11:36 AM |
Saw it opening night with one ending, the movie ended it's run in theaters with a different one.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | November 16, 2017 11:44 AM |
The Music
by Anonymous | reply 15 | November 16, 2017 11:48 AM |
"Come, ride the wings of the demon"
by Anonymous | reply 16 | November 16, 2017 11:58 AM |
Dana Plato in thT clip posted above.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | November 16, 2017 1:15 PM |
How did John Boorman survive this?
by Anonymous | reply 18 | November 16, 2017 1:55 PM |
I have never been able to understand how the same person who made Point Blank (which is a [italic]great[/italic] movie) did Exorcist II. It’s just beyond my humble cognitive abilities...
by Anonymous | reply 19 | November 16, 2017 2:29 PM |
There's some scene where pudgy Linda Blair is tap dancing in a glittery outfit. WTF? Anyway, this film is regarded as one of the worst movies of all time. That's really all you need to know.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | November 16, 2017 3:09 PM |
Poor Dana Plato :(
by Anonymous | reply 21 | November 16, 2017 4:42 PM |
I’m Austic.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | November 17, 2017 12:15 AM |
Is there no hope for you? Once you have been brushed by Liz Taylor's... Er, I mean Pazuzu's wings??
by Anonymous | reply 25 | November 17, 2017 1:22 AM |
Best line: “Kokomo can help me find Pazuzu!”
by Anonymous | reply 26 | November 17, 2017 5:06 AM |
Poor Dana Plato didn’t even get her name in the credits. Girl was screwed from the get go.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | November 17, 2017 5:12 AM |
Linda Blair's actual menstrual blood was used in several scenes...beyond creepy.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | November 17, 2017 5:19 AM |
"You must rip out ber evil tampon!"
by Anonymous | reply 29 | November 17, 2017 6:49 AM |
I consider it a cult classic.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | November 18, 2017 2:35 AM |
I thought Richard Burton was still quite hunky in the movie.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | November 18, 2017 3:58 AM |
Bump -- it's airing tonight on TCM (4:00am Eastern, 1:00am Pacific); set your dvr's!
by Anonymous | reply 32 | January 21, 2018 2:46 AM |
This is a hilarious movie to watch stoned!
by Anonymous | reply 33 | March 20, 2018 3:15 PM |
R14, how did that happen? Did WB finally send out the last reel?
by Anonymous | reply 34 | March 20, 2018 3:19 PM |
Linda was robbed of an Oscar nomination for this role.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | March 20, 2018 3:27 PM |
Didn't Pauline Kael LOVE this movie? I suspect Pauline may have been stoned when watching this film, too.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | March 20, 2018 3:30 PM |
Blair was enjoying lots of primo blow and Rick James’ BBC during this, she was possessed by dat good dick and bad script!
by Anonymous | reply 37 | March 20, 2018 3:35 PM |
The recut is by far the worse version, the storyline is changed but attempts to rectify the campy dialogue of the original make the recut version banal. Sharon's line muttering "stupid bitch" is cut. When describing the hypnosis session, Lamont's line of "horrible...and fascinating" is shortened to just "horrible." The rest of his conversation with Dr. Tuskin is snipped out. The scene where "evil Regan" and Father Lamont have a demonic necking session has been removed; so has the moment when Dr. Tuskin calls "help!" and runs up and down the street.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | March 20, 2018 3:55 PM |
We still don’t know who played possessed Regan in this dreck. It’s a mystery.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | March 20, 2018 4:15 PM |
Let's all be the press conference held after it. Anybody got a pic?
by Anonymous | reply 40 | March 20, 2018 4:16 PM |
R36, Kael did defend it and said it might be a classic if we didn't speak English.
Boorman cut out the eyerolling scenes that elicited screams of laughter.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | March 20, 2018 4:22 PM |
Hilarious, R41.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | March 20, 2018 5:27 PM |
The who? The what? What the...?
by Anonymous | reply 43 | March 20, 2018 5:38 PM |
It is one of the worst things I have ever seen. And what's weird is that John Boorman has directed two classics, Deliverance and Point Blank. And there was so much talent involved in the movie. And the score is by Ennio Morricone. It takes a special kind of stupid to ruin everything you're given.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | March 20, 2018 11:13 PM |
The only effective scene in the entire movie is where Reagan is walking up on the balcony in her Manhattan apartment and you hear evil Reagan (or whoever) whispering.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | March 20, 2018 11:31 PM |
Did Ellen Burstyn bow out because she knew the script was terrible?
by Anonymous | reply 47 | March 20, 2018 11:33 PM |
Yes, r44, and I also love Excalibur and like Zardoz very much. Boorman may not have been a brilliant director but when things went right he could be a very good one. I wonder what really happened here.
Is the first version with all the excesses available on home video? Boorman recut the film a few days after the opening to remove the parts that had audiences throwing things at the screen. The first version is supposed to be a lot more fun.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | March 20, 2018 11:37 PM |
R48, I think Boorman has a great sense for visuals. But the Exorcist II brings out all of his worst traits--robotic (yet, Baroque?) dialogue, unnatural human communiation. I'm sure the reaction to The Exorcist II really changed his approach to film. And I really need to watch Zardoz, it looks very interesting and quirky.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | March 20, 2018 11:48 PM |
I like Zardoz but I figured out the plot twist immediately from the title, which evidently most people didn't at the time.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | March 21, 2018 12:02 AM |
R50, if only Sean connery was like 10-15 years younger when he was in Zardoz, he would have looked even hotter (and just as ridiculous) in that red jock strap costume.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | March 21, 2018 12:06 AM |
i have a Daddy thing and Sean Connery looked perfectly fine in Zardoz.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | March 21, 2018 12:34 AM |
So is the first cut of Excorcist II available? And did people really not get the plot reveal in Zardoz from the title?
by Anonymous | reply 53 | March 21, 2018 12:45 AM |
R53.
1) Yes. But it's complicated because most home video version don't reveal on the cover which version is contained and there was a third version, cut from both that was the first TV version, as well as the European version. You have to check IMDB and WP and Amazon reviews and Google to know what you're getting.
2) Yes, most people are that stupid.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | March 21, 2018 1:01 AM |
R56, the only great thing about the entire movie is Morricone's music. Particulary, "Reagan's theme".
by Anonymous | reply 57 | March 24, 2018 3:48 PM |
Awful!
by Anonymous | reply 58 | December 16, 2018 9:20 PM |
The plot line involving Sharon was creepy.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | December 17, 2018 12:42 AM |