Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Trump's coal push loses power as U.S. goes green

DALLAS (Reuters Breakingviews) - President Donald Trump’s coal push is losing power as America goes green. An administration plan to subsidize solid fuels has stirred a backlash from industry, which fears it will distort power prices. Meanwhile U.S. carbon emissions from coal fell at a record pace in 2015. Environmental and economic forces are conspiring against the president’s campaign pledge.

In September, Secretary of Energy Rick Perry proposed that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission adopt new grid rules that would effectively subsidize coal- and nuclear-powered electricity producers. The feedback has been strongly negative. Respondents ranging from grid operators to oil and gas trade groups to Brooklyn-based arts and crafts website Etsy have opposed the plan. The commission is supposed to take a decision by Dec. 11, but on Tuesday Chairman Neil Chatterjee told an industry publication the commission might order a new round of study to ensure that whatever decision it takes can stand up to legal scrutiny.

Coal’s future may not brighten even if FERC adopts Perry’s plan. On Monday, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said coal emissions fell by a record amount in 2015. There were big declines in states that were key to Trump’s election victory, including Ohio and Pennsylvania. And the ultimate irony came in Perry’s home state of Texas, which recorded the largest drop and enjoyed a surge in wind power. One year after the election, Trump’s big coal push has produced a whimper. The 2017 Global Carbon Budget, released by the Global Carbon Project, said U.S. carbon emissions from fossil fuels would continue their decade-long decline in 2017, albeit at a slower pace. The group predicts coal’s share will increase slightly, though the EIA shows renewable energy growing at a far faster pace.

That pattern looks set to endure. Wind power should cost less than natural gas and coal by about 2030 if recent price trends persist, researchers at the Rochester Institute of Technology said in a recent study. The Rhodium Group anticipates carbon emissions at that point will be 27 percent to 35 percent below 2005 levels as a result of coal-plant closures. No amount of subsidies are likely to bend those curves.

by Anonymousreply 712/07/2017

If the hillbillies don't get: 1) coal and factory jobs; 2) gays put into concentration camps; 3) an end to the Obamafine (for not having insurance); 4) a wall to keep the Mexicans out ("Dey tk 'er jbs!!"); and 5) Muslims sent back to Muslimakhstan... they will turn on Tweety.

by Anonymousreply 111/15/2017

Rick Perry should never wear a spread collar.


by Anonymousreply 211/15/2017

Excellent news, trending on Twitter right now:

[bold]General Electric to cut 12,000 jobs in power business revamp[/bold]

[quote]The U.S. company launched the cuts to save $1 billion in 2018, saying it expected dwindling demand for fossil fuel power plants to continue.

[quote]GE has previously said it would exit its lighting, transportation, industrial solutions and electrical grid businesses. It also plans to ditch its 62.5-percent stake in oilfield services company Baker Hughes (BHGE.N).

[quote]GE rival Siemens (SIEGn.DE) is cutting about 6,900 jobs, or close to 2 percent of its global workforce, mainly at its power and gas division, which has been hit by the rapid growth of renewables.

by Anonymousreply 312/07/2017

Deplorables on Twitter are of course blaming European libs for this.

by Anonymousreply 412/07/2017

It's just diversionary and rabble rousing. Keep following the money.

by Anonymousreply 512/07/2017

Why is Rick Perry air-grabbing tits in OP's pic?

by Anonymousreply 612/07/2017

I've just come across this translation of news at R3 into deplorable-speak (deplora-speak?) on Twitter:

[quote]General Electric expected to lay off 4,500 ppl in europe bringing jobs back to the United States its starting and good morning America!

by Anonymousreply 712/07/2017
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Don't you just LOVE clicking on these things on every single site you visit? I know we do! You can thank the EU parliament for making everyone in the world click on these pointless things while changing absolutely nothing. If you are interested you can take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT and we'll set a dreaded cookie to make it go away. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!