(Copypasted from linked Twitter account) I first met #BryanSinger in 2000. My boyfriend was one of his best friends, so I had many interactions with him. From the first time I met him, he was always on something. He also constantly hit on me, always asking me to show him my dick or ass. (1/14) When I’d tell my boyfriend about this, he’d say “oh Bryan just gets playful when he’s high”. But we stopped dropping by his house at my insistence. We’d still bump into him at parties. He almost always had a “posse”. (2/14) This was always him, 2-3 older 50-70 year old men who were obviously on drugs but still wearing their dress shirts & pants (he introduced them as producers) and at least 5 to sometimes 10 young men. I should really say boys, none of them could’ve been older than 16 or 17. (3/14) They were all aspiring models/actors who were always doped up & partially naked. Bryan always made a point to tell me they were going to his place for a “private party” & asked me to come with them. I said no every time. (4/14) This same scenario happened 5 times. Every time, the cast was different. Different gross old “producers”, different harem of boys. But every time, Bryan tried to convince me to join, offering me drugs, even offering me a bit part in X Men 2. (5/14) One night, I asked him who these old men were, & he said “they have a lot of money”. I then asked who all these young guys were & he said, “does it matter?” & laughed. And I laughed back. Yes, I hate myself for it. I don’t really have an excuse. (6/14) This same situation had played out so many times, & even though I knew what was happening was awful, I think part of me had resigned myself to the fact that this was Hollywood. Speaking out about this was unimaginable then. (7/14) That same night, in response to all my questions, Bryan again asked to see my dick. I said no. He then asked to feel my ass. After hesitating, I relented, thinking he’d give it a quick squeeze. Nope. (8/14) He quickly & very aggressively shoved his hand down my jeans & underwear and tried to shove his finger inside me. He had his other hand clamped on my shoulder so I couldn’t immediately move away. He penetrated me for a split second before I shoved him away (9/14) I got his hands off me & basically told him to fuck off & he proceeded to blame me, saying I had been teasing him since we met & what did I expect. I tried to leave & he asked if GHB would make me feel better. (10/14) I said no, that I just wanted to go home. He said fine, but I’d better not tell anyone because no one would believe me anyway. I absolutely believed this, so I never said anything until now. (11/14) I never went to any of Bryan Singers “private parties”, but I guarantee the stories of the young men who say they were raped are true. I witnessed the beginning of many of these nights. I wish I would’ve loudly objected to what I saw happening. (12/14) I also wish I would’ve had the courage to speak out when he sexually assaulted me. It didn’t benefit me at all to stay silent, all it did was allow myself to become disillusioned & bitter. I hope telling this story helps. Not just me, but anyone else who’s struggling. (13/14) Don’t be like me. Don’t keep this awful shit bottled up for 15+ years. It poisons you. Call the motherfuckers out. They are cowards. You are stronger than you know. (14/14)
Is Bryan Singer’s Collapse Imminent?
|by Anonymous||reply 419||11/17/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 1||11/01/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 2||11/01/2017|
Who is this whiny cocktease?
|by Anonymous||reply 3||11/01/2017|
Why didn't this guy speak out when all those accusations were made about Singer a few years back?
|by Anonymous||reply 4||11/01/2017|
If you don't like it then walk away, snowflake.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||11/01/2017|
I knew that the pedo defenders would be here instantly.
I hope Singer goes the way of Spacey and Weinstein. Buh bye.
|by Anonymous||reply 6||11/01/2017|
He let him squeeze his ass?
What a whiny snowflake.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||11/01/2017|
This is sad.
|by Anonymous||reply 8||11/01/2017|
Bryan, you in danger gurl
|by Anonymous||reply 9||11/01/2017|
Has anyone here seen Justin Smith? He's a fucking MOUNTAIN!
|by Anonymous||reply 10||11/01/2017|
Justin Smith is 6' 4", and has a neck wider than his head. But I don't think this Justin Smith is that Justin Smith.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||11/01/2017|
This podcast from 2014 has stories of Bryan Singer's house parties starting at 1:10:00
|by Anonymous||reply 12||11/01/2017|
I wonder if Singer and Spacey harassed Brandon Routh on the set of Superman. More importantly, did they abuse the little boy who played Clark as a youngster?
|by Anonymous||reply 13||11/01/2017|
Actor from 7th Heaven claimed Spacey hit on him
|by Anonymous||reply 14||11/01/2017|
"BUT, I HAD A BABY WITH A WOMAN!"
|by Anonymous||reply 15||11/01/2017|
Headline should read "Is Bryan Singer's Prolapse Imminent?". My sources say yes.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||11/01/2017|
[quote]I wonder if Singer and Spacey harassed Brandon Routh on the set of Superman. More importantly, did they abuse the little boy who played Clark as a youngster?
Yeah, it’s like the 10 gazillionth time this question has been asked. Spare us and use the search function, man.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||11/02/2017|
r14 the hot cop! he was so hot!
|by Anonymous||reply 18||11/02/2017|
Jesus, Routh was not Singer or Spacey’s type! He was a grown man with big muscles!
But the actor playing young Clark, Stephan Bender, they both would have definitely tried to rape him.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||11/02/2017|
Good thing you copied it cuz the thread is gone now.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||11/02/2017|
The tweet's been deleted and the account closed. Fast lawyers are fast.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||11/02/2017|
Wow, that was scary fast.
|by Anonymous||reply 22||11/02/2017|
It's disturbing how quickly they can shut someone down, damn.
And I hope the jackholes on this thread that think sticking a finger in an ass is the same as grabbing it get clocked in the face by the next person they try that on.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||11/02/2017|
I just watched 'An Open Secret' yesterday. There were few surprises, other than they do pretty much out Singer. If you've got a few hours to spare before the weekend it's worth watching but it's only free on Vimeo until Sunday.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||11/02/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 25||11/02/2017|
Bryan Singer has the most violent defenders. From his lawyers to publicists. No one will ever be able to take him down.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||11/02/2017|
Just watch it happen, R26.
The guy is ugly as fuck, too.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||11/02/2017|
That he paid someone to have a baby boy for him is chilling.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||11/02/2017|
Singer has a VERY POWERFUL mogul defender who’s into the same things. A defender who has close ties to a former President. Singer goes down, the defender goes down, the former Pres is embroiled. Defender is a sly old...FOX!!!
|by Anonymous||reply 29||11/02/2017|
Yeah, Singer has had years to clean up his messes and is now learning from Spacey's mistakes as well. He's not going anywhere.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||11/02/2017|
The DEFENDER’S President friend is not “BARRY...”
|by Anonymous||reply 31||11/02/2017|
Epstein again? Come on R29 just spell it out
|by Anonymous||reply 32||11/02/2017|
R32, I did. Twice.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||11/02/2017|
Presumably the mogul defender is Geffen who's close to the Clintons.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||11/02/2017|
Jesus Christ, he's implying Barry Diller, who used to run the Fox Network
Some of you people are too stupid to live.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||11/02/2017|
There’s a new President now, and whether you like him or not, this stuff that’s been happening is one of his pet projects. And for that, I kind of love him a little. Stay tuuuuuuuned.
|by Anonymous||reply 36||11/02/2017|
You mean Diane von Fürstenberg's husband.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||11/02/2017|
Oh sure R36, because he's not done anything like it himself. Because he is not EXACTLY like these men.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||11/02/2017|
That's Matthew 7:3 btw.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||11/02/2017|
Personally, I have always preferred the term "seraglio" to "harem".
|by Anonymous||reply 40||11/02/2017|
I wonder if any of the older guys referred to as Bryan Singer’s posse were involved with Digital Entertainment Network (AKA “The DEN of Pedos”).
|by Anonymous||reply 41||11/02/2017|
[quote]Some of you people are too stupid to live.
You must be a very sad and lonely person. Consider therapy (or suicide).
|by Anonymous||reply 42||11/02/2017|
R35 is completely correct in everything he said.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||11/02/2017|
Singer has been insulating himself for the past few years. The people to go after are those men who procured for him - they would hang around that club in WeHo - TigerHeat. We've had threads on it. Hugh Jackman and Nicolas Hoult partook of Singer's hospitality.
|by Anonymous||reply 44||11/02/2017|
Wayne Castro, procurer of twinks (and younger?) for Singer
|by Anonymous||reply 45||11/02/2017|
Cops / investigators need to speak to this guy Ray Rhodes who DJed at TogerHeat
|by Anonymous||reply 46||11/02/2017|
Those twinks are all of age though r45. Having consentual sex with 18 and 19 year olds is not a crime.
And I am not a Singer defender, would be happy to see him go down, but it won't be for that.
|by Anonymous||reply 47||11/02/2017|
Michael Egan was of age R47, the allegations are that Singer rapes / uses roofies and booze
|by Anonymous||reply 48||11/02/2017|
Ugh, crazy Poo Shoes is all over this thread.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||11/02/2017|
Three Hollywood executives were accused of sexual abuse Monday in lawsuits filed by the man who last week accused X-Men director Bryan Singer of sexually abusing him.
Garth Ancier, Gary Goddard, and David Neuman allegedly sexually abused Michael Egan during parties at an Encino, Calif., mansion and on trips to Hawaii, the suits, which were filed in a federal court in Hawaii, state. The allegations against Singer, which he has denied, took place at the same parties and trips. Egan, 31, says he was 15 when the abuse first occurred.
The men each allegedly fondled or groped Egan, sodomized him, forced him to engage in oral copulation and encouraged him to consume drugs or alcohol, according to the suits. Egan's attorney Jeff Herman described them as part of a larger "Hollywood sex ring" at a press conference Monday.
Garth Ancier was the founding entertainment president, at age 28, of Fox in 1986. He later went on to become the entertainment president of the WB and of NBC.
Gary Goddard runs an entertainment and design company specializing in large-scale live entertainment venues for hotels and casinos. He also directed the 1986 movie Masters of the Universe.
David Neuman is a former president of Disney TV who joined Digital Entertainment Network, or DEN, the company founded by Marc Collins-Rector, who allegedly hosted the parties in Encino.
|by Anonymous||reply 50||11/02/2017|
A long time ago, Brent Corrigan attended one of Singer's parties and recorded a bit of it. He put it on his website and then immediately took it off. I remembered he went with one other Twink, an Asian, and then they went to the pool area. There are likely a lot of those videos around.
|by Anonymous||reply 51||11/02/2017|
Of course last time I posted this documentary link some fool on here claimed it was "Anti gay propaganda" and a "conspiracy theory".
These men are NOT gay or bisexual they are pedos/hebephiles.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||11/02/2017|
does Singer have a career to destroy? has he directed anything in years?
|by Anonymous||reply 53||11/02/2017|
Dude, where's my escape vehicle?
|by Anonymous||reply 54||11/02/2017|
False r47. During the DEN era Michael Egan would have been under the age of consent.
|by Anonymous||reply 55||11/02/2017|
Fuck Anthony Rapp for doing this to a gay community
|by Anonymous||reply 56||11/02/2017|
Meant to refer to r48. I was r47.
|by Anonymous||reply 57||11/02/2017|
He's implying Murdoch.
|by Anonymous||reply 58||11/02/2017|
R56, so I guess you're cool with pedos/hebephiles and sexual abuse of underage boys and girls, eh?
|by Anonymous||reply 59||11/02/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 60||11/02/2017|
[quote]does Singer have a career to destroy? has he directed anything in years?
He directed the last two X Men movies and is currently shooting the Freddie Mercury biopic. He also produces tv series including Legion.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||11/02/2017|
This thread will be deleted in 3...2...
|by Anonymous||reply 62||11/02/2017|
R52, pedophile isn't a sexuality. They can be gay or straight. Allegedly Singer is a gay man who also happens to be a pedophile.
I wonder what will happen. Without evidence it may just look like drug-fueled sex with barely legals. Which won't bring anyone down nor should it. Rape or sex either minors though, different story. Either way, bad optics. I'm thinking he might squeak by as more prominent names are called out for more explicit stuff.
If FOX was smart (someone at FOX take heed, please), they would get another director to film an alternate ending to Dark Phoenix just in case. You could even make it completely reset the universe and start fresh in two years with a completely new cast.
|by Anonymous||reply 63||11/02/2017|
r56 You should be saying fuck Spacey for doing this to the gay community. Guys like him are the problem here.
|by Anonymous||reply 64||11/02/2017|
[quote]If FOX was smart (someone at FOX take heed, please), they would get another director to film an alternate ending to Dark Phoenix just in case. You could even make it completely reset the universe and start fresh in two years with a completely new cast.
Singer isn’t directing Dark Phoenix. The guy that co-wrote the last few X-Men movies is directing this time.
|by Anonymous||reply 65||11/02/2017|
OP doesn't know how to post or use paragraphs.
|by Anonymous||reply 66||11/02/2017|
We discussed all this back is 2014 and since then his career has exactly fizzled.
|by Anonymous||reply 67||11/02/2017|
Wow - gone very fast. Considering Twitter barely takes action on the most egregious content imaginable (not to mention fake news who led to our National Disgrace in Chief) I think this person must have been threatened directly. He couldn't pay the legal bills in a defamation suit even if he's right, and that's the sad part too.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||11/02/2017|
What is dark phoenix? Is it like black swan? I didn't see that movie.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||11/02/2017|
Dark Phoenix in the name of a storyline from the X-Men comics circa 1980. That storyline is the title and plot of the next X-Men movie, due out next year.
|by Anonymous||reply 70||11/02/2017|
[quote]Fuck Kevin Spacey and Bryan Singer for doing this to a gay community
Fixed it for you R56.....
|by Anonymous||reply 71||11/02/2017|
Ah. Maybe there are people who watch that type of movies.
|by Anonymous||reply 72||11/02/2017|
[quote]I wonder what will happen. Without evidence it may just look like drug-fueled sex with barely legals. Which won't bring anyone down nor should it.
No, no, of course not......feeding "barely legal" kids drugs (this is illegal, jackass) and alcohol (illegal for anyone under 21 y/o, retard) so they are unconscious and then raping them is nothing for anyone to be concerned about.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||11/02/2017|
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Many more will come out against pedo-freak Singer. Many. More.
|by Anonymous||reply 74||11/02/2017|
Hitting the mainstream.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||11/02/2017|
No one's mentioned that cunt Michelle Clunie yet. The bitch that is trying to legitimize this pedophile piece of shit and turning a blind eye to all his disgusting activities.
I hope that two faced lying bitch beard rots in hell.
|by Anonymous||reply 76||11/02/2017|
What a dumbass Michele Cluny was to agree to spawn with a known pederast. Now she will have to fight to keep her little boy out of Singer's evil clutches.
Guess she did it for the money. What is the going rate these days to sell your kid to the devil?
|by Anonymous||reply 77||11/02/2017|
R77 It makes my skin crawl.
|by Anonymous||reply 78||11/02/2017|
When I started reading this it suddenly occured to me that if Singer gets dragged like Weinstein it could drag Hugh Jackman out. He is in that pic on the plane so you know he went to parties. All it takes is for one kid to mention him. Boy, will Deb be pissed.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||11/02/2017|
The Forward has noted the Twitter account is gone:
Smith’s Twitter account is now gone. It isn’t clear if Smith deleted his own account or if his account was suspended by the website. We’ll update this story as it develops.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||11/02/2017|
 Smiths was harrased to delete his account.
|by Anonymous||reply 81||11/02/2017|
Singer's hands aren't so clean. His own pool parties may be populated with barely legal twinks but at the DEN parties he attended (with mandatory nudity for the boys), the kids were far from legal.
The statute of limitations will save him legally but there may still be repercussion. Fewer people will want to work with a creep.
|by Anonymous||reply 82||11/02/2017|
I recall after Egan withdrew his lawsuit there was talk some goons were sent to threaten him - or even actually attacked him. Wonder if that's what happened here.
And R82 - it's such a shame that you're right to say "fewer" as opposed to be able to say "no-one will want to work with a creep"
|by Anonymous||reply 83||11/02/2017|
People will talk. They can't threaten or buy off everyone. It will be like trying to hold back a tidal wave.
|by Anonymous||reply 84||11/02/2017|
What I don't understand. There are so many reports out there that Bryan Singer gets these barely legal twinks drunk (and high). The legal drinking age is 21. A lot of people make themselves complicit for not taking action to get Singer for that creepy fact alone.
|by Anonymous||reply 85||11/02/2017|
I wonder if Bryan Singer's former fuck buddy writer Michael Dougherty participated in Singer's pedo pool parties.
|by Anonymous||reply 86||11/02/2017|
The Yahoo-Article is deleted. His Lawyers are working fast.
|by Anonymous||reply 87||11/02/2017|
R87 Not surprised at all. He's the only one of these creeps that seems like he could arrange for the accusers to "go away forever", if you catch my drift.
A psychopath through and through. You can see it in his eyes; it's always been there.
|by Anonymous||reply 88||11/02/2017|
Okay, I know this site is awful but the Daily Wire still has their article up.
|by Anonymous||reply 89||11/02/2017|
His first movie was really weird, come to think of it. And he built everything else from then on.
I'm very glad I never watched An Apt Pupil.
|by Anonymous||reply 90||11/02/2017|
Singer's Twitter account is also closed.
|by Anonymous||reply 91||11/02/2017|
Singer's face makes my skin crawl even worse than Spacey's, which is saying something.
|by Anonymous||reply 92||11/02/2017|
It's like back in 2014 when Singer was accused of sexually abusing a boy - and nothing was done. It's disgusting and a shame.
|by Anonymous||reply 93||11/02/2017|
I believe the current (SJW / social media) outrage culture can do thing that were not possible in 2014.
|by Anonymous||reply 94||11/02/2017|
THINGS! not thing (sorry).
|by Anonymous||reply 95||11/02/2017|
The Google cache for the Yahoo article.
|by Anonymous||reply 96||11/02/2017|
[quote]It's like back in 2014 when Singer was accused of sexually abusing a boy - and nothing was done. It's disgusting and a shame.
And look where the accuser is now, in jail. Not because of a conspiracy but because he scammed people for years. I'm not saying Singer is innocent just because Egan is unreliable but you definitely need someone else than a grifter to take Singer to court.
"After Egan accused Singer and others of sexual abuse committed when he was a teen, his story fell apart, and in June, Egan’s former lawyer issued an apology to two of the accused, Garth Ancier and David E. Neuman, writing, “Based on what I know now, I believe that I participated in making what I now know to be untrue and proveably false allegations against you. Had I known what I learned after filing the lawsuits, I would never have filed these claims against you.”"
|by Anonymous||reply 97||11/02/2017|
[quote]Fuck Anthony Rapp for doing this to a gay community
Unfortunately, when one says that it REINFORCES the idea that we're all pedos...or that we are complicit in our silence.
Better to have this day of reckoning and for good gays to disavow this evil and actively try to purge it from our ranks if we can.
|by Anonymous||reply 98||11/02/2017|
So Michael Egan is a grifter? That his accusations about Singer were a lie? I was never up for conspiracy theories, but personally doubting that his accusations are false. And yes, you need more evidences (more power) to take Singer down and truth to be told, I don't believe it will happen.
Srry, English is not my native language.
|by Anonymous||reply 99||11/02/2017|
R99, Egan most definitely is a grifter, and was sentenced to jail for conning people in 2015. Now, I've always thought he wasn't lying about everything involving DEN or even Singer, especially since some of the guys there were most definitely abusing teen boys, but he was proven to have lied in the 2014 lawsuit against Singer and others. I couldn't find it now but I remember reading somewhere that he had admitted to a friend that none of the guys he was accusing had raped him. I'm sure I'll be called a Singer apologist once again but the reality is you can't throw a man in jail based on lies. You need a solid case.
Based on the rumors it's quite obvious Singer likes twinks. The question is has he been taking advantage of them by drugging and raping them, like some people are accusing him of doing.
|by Anonymous||reply 100||11/02/2017|
Now that's an interesting development, R91
As for Singer's victims - so often the victims of sexual abuse will turn to drugs or get fucked up in different ways which makes them incredibly easy to dismiss as reliable. Why do you think so many Hollywood victims mention drugs being pushed on them from a young age?
|by Anonymous||reply 101||11/02/2017|
Who cares. If it's not work related, it's just plain gossip. Fuck off. You want what you do in your off hours reported and used against you? What you did 30 years ago even? Jesus...
|by Anonymous||reply 102||11/02/2017|
[QUOTE]You want what you do in your off hours reported and used against you?
That's exactly what Singer and his cronies were doing. You play along, you get cast, you don't then you don't get work.
|by Anonymous||reply 103||11/02/2017|
Michael Egan is a homophobic straight guy trying to being down gays (not just Singer - he accused other men). He admitted as much.
I could buy that Singer abused other boys but I think Egan is full of it
|by Anonymous||reply 104||11/02/2017|
Singer’s Twitter account deleted. Wow.
|by Anonymous||reply 105||11/02/2017|
I wonder if Tom Hardy is going to say something. Baird & Singer both fucked him on the Nemesis shoot and Hardy was only hired because Baird 'discovered' him when Hardy was selling himself back in the UK.
|by Anonymous||reply 106||11/02/2017|
[quote]I remembered he went with one other Twink, [bold]an Asian[/bold]
|by Anonymous||reply 107||11/02/2017|
He’s not escaping this time. The knives are out.
|by Anonymous||reply 108||11/02/2017|
Everything you need to know about Singer's relationships with these boys can be seen in the eyes in this photo. Singer is projecting smug dominance, confident defiance and sexual ownership and indulgence. The kid is giving the seductive, Lolita looks he knows THEY want that can get him the acceptance he craves.
|by Anonymous||reply 109||11/02/2017|
It's WND but whatever:
Unleashed! 'Flood' of Hollywood sex-abuse survivors ready to talk Producer: 'It's not just a lone pedophile. This is a highly organized group of people'
The sexual assault accusations against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein and now actor Kevin Spacey have Hollywood bracing for a “flood” of abused actors to come forward in the coming days and name the predators who targeted them, a scandal that one activist says will reach epic proportions.
“This is big. [T]his is going to be worse for Hollywood than the church scandal was for the Vatican,” said Matt Valentinas, one of the executive producers behind the 2015 documentary “An Open Secret,” which pulled back the curtain on the sexual abuse of children in Hollywood and named many producers, agents and other figures who work with kids in show business...
Valentinas told WND and Radio America that, for those in the know, the allegations against Spacey did not come as a shock. He said Spacey’s name came up in the research for “An Open Secret.”
“Yes, it did, in the sense that he’s very close friends with Bryan Singer,” Valentinas said. “Bryan Singer is the director of ‘X-Men’ and is currently shooting the movie on (the rock band) Queen. That’s how we came upon some of these rumors about Kevin Spacey. It wasn’t really the focus of our investigation, but his name was definitely brought up all the time for sure.
Valentinas believes Rapp and Smith will only be the beginning of an avalanche of current and former child actors coming forward to name their abusers.
“We’re already getting calls from many other survivors, so I think we’re going to start seeing floods of survivors coming out in the next couple of weeks or even days with stories,” Valentinas said. “The truth cannot be kept back...”
What was the response from the Screen Actors Guild?
“Instead of SAG saying, ‘Oh my God, that’s a problem. How can we help you?’ they sent us threatening letters to take out the interview from the movie, take out all mention of SAG from the movie. It might have been the first instance of a creative guild trying to go after a director and a producer and censor content. It was unprecedented,” Valentinas said...
What was the response from the Screen Actors Guild?
“Instead of SAG saying, ‘Oh my God, that’s a problem. How can we help you?’ they sent us threatening letters to take out the interview from the movie, take out all mention of SAG from the movie. It might have been the first instance of a creative guild trying to go after a director and a producer and censor content. It was unprecedented,” Valentinas said.
|by Anonymous||reply 110||11/02/2017|
I remember when the Singer allegations came out and no one backed the guy and they ripped him apart. Now everyone is coming out of the woodwork to recall sexual assaults for HW, KS, BR etc. What has changed? They used to sweep this stuff under the rug, blackball accusers, push people off buildings, threaten lawsuits etc. I am glad this is coming out but the whole town is corrupt and the fucking for roles/stardom has been going on for a long time. Now the whole town is full of virtuous men and women who ran scared at any sexual contact or suggestion. Obviously some stars were down for whatever and are now successful and famous.
|by Anonymous||reply 111||11/02/2017|
Culture Shift due to mass of Millenials + (Gen X + Gen Y) + Social Media.
|by Anonymous||reply 112||11/02/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 113||11/02/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 114||11/02/2017|
That Yahoo article is something. The Forward piece has been pulled.
What of Teflon Woody (disgusting nickname), the guy with the 16 yr old first wife (not SY!), the one he met at 15, he was in 20s? He used to pick her up after school her sophomore year.
BS is taking an aggressive approach, probably due to his "connections." Will the protection hold as per usual for Allen and Polanski?
|by Anonymous||reply 115||11/02/2017|
We need to call out this agenda in the gay community and on DL, as we did in the 70s and the 90s.
------------ "Eileen Scheff — who has represented BAMN on multiple occasions, including at the Supreme Court — has been a self-described “member of NAMBLA.” The bulletin identified Scheff as an RWL member.
Scheff has been identified as a founder of BAMN.
Peter Schmidt, a senior writer for the Chronicle of Higher Education, wrote in a book for which Scheff was interviewed that she “helped found” BAMN, in addition to serving as its legal counsel. “Affirmative action was built by people taking direct militant action,” she told Schmidt, explaining BAMN’s riotous approach to activism.
At a 1991 NAMBLA press conference, Scheff denounced the “witch-hunt” against pedophiles.
“As an activist in the legal and political struggle for lesbian/gay rights and for freedom of sexual expression, I am here to support NAMBLA and to demand that the witch-hunt against it must be stopped,” Scheff said at the conference. “The media and police are targeting NAMBLA because it stands for the rights of young people to have consensual sex with whomever they want.”
“Denying youth their sexuality or driving sexual expression deeper and deeper underground will not stop child molestation,” Scheff added. She called for “youth-controlled centers where they can freely socialize and enjoy safe, consensual sex.”
“I call on all progressive people in the lesbian/gay community, in the women’s movement, and in the community at large to defend NAMBLA and its right to advocate for consensual sex regardless of age, and to unite our forces to make a fight for the real solutions to sexual coercion and abuse,” Scheff said."
|by Anonymous||reply 116||11/02/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 117||11/02/2017|
Family Guy writer exposes Bryan Singer.
|by Anonymous||reply 118||11/03/2017|
R63 they are first and foremost pedophiles/hebephiles, they can claim they are "gay" all they want but if an adult man is gay, or bisexual he's not going to be sexually attracted to kids or teenagers at all period.
|by Anonymous||reply 119||11/03/2017|
A lot of the so called "leaders" of gay/LGBT rights are actually pedos/hebephiles, or sexual predators towards teens and children, and this includes Harvey Milk, Harry Hay, Matthew Shepard (did not argue for N A M B L A but he did sexually abuse kids), Larry Kramer, and Allen Ginsberg. They have all admitted to sexually abusing teens or young boys, or have records of this. They also argued for the inclusion of N A M B L A at pride events in the 80s and early 90s. Dan Savage also has an unhealthy obsession with teenage boys but this is not a secret.
Dan Savage also has an extremely unhealthy obsession with teenagers.
John Waters is a pedo/hebephile or a pedo /hebephile apologist since in a collection of essays he wrote and self-published he actually argued that it was fine for a pedo/hebephile who had a sock/foot fetish who was HIV+ or living with AIDS to sexually abuse teenage boys via oral sex since in Waters' delusional mind 'nobody has ever gotten HIV from oral sex' which is not true.
|by Anonymous||reply 120||11/03/2017|
Dan has also written about "inter-generational sex" all while posing as a gay parenting expert.
|by Anonymous||reply 121||11/03/2017|
One of the founders of HRC is a pedo. Lesbian mom "icon" Rosen defended him, despite video.
Don't forget Spacey and his yen for 14 year olds.
|by Anonymous||reply 122||11/03/2017|
Dan Savage has written some really creepy things about teens. Of course he and Singer acquired sons...
|by Anonymous||reply 123||11/03/2017|
Yeah, the most prominent gay rights activists seem to be the most vocal about having sex with teens. Peter Tatchell kept bitching about lowering the age of consent in the UK as well.
Makes me think gay liberation was always just a stepping stone for them. Shudder.
|by Anonymous||reply 124||11/03/2017|
So little concern here for the victims. Disgusting DL worries much more about how this will affect the gays.
|by Anonymous||reply 125||11/03/2017|
Of course R125 I have told what R124 said to gay friends or former friends of mine and they all replied about how this is not true of course, and anyone with a brain knows they're just in denial or naive.
|by Anonymous||reply 126||11/03/2017|
How old was he when this happened? The fact that he doesn't say probably means he was of age. No, that does in no way excuse being sexually assaulted. I just think in order to call these fuckers out, something VERY bad had to have happened to the victim. It's more serious if those who come out about being sexually molested/abused/assaulted were minors.
|by Anonymous||reply 127||11/03/2017|
Most members of NAMBLA since the 1980s have been paid police informants.
|by Anonymous||reply 128||11/03/2017|
R128 sounds suspiciously like the pedo appologist troll Erna/Mrs. Patrick Campbell who claims that the CIA, NWO, Cannanites/bankers, FBI, etc. are to blame for everything, and that pedos really do not exist and that sexual abuse cases in European countries between an adult and minor would be "laughed out of court" or "not even make it to court".
If you are NOT MPC/Erna I'd hope that there are undercover LEOs in pedo groups like N A M B L A.
|by Anonymous||reply 129||11/03/2017|
It's disturbing that all the news stories have been pulled. It looks like Singer has some powerful people working for him.
|by Anonymous||reply 130||11/03/2017|
The big head/flat face/squinty eyed funny looking queen can run but she can't hide.
|by Anonymous||reply 131||11/03/2017|
I must be naive or without a brain then, R126, because I've never heard Tatchell advocate child abuse. He's proposed a tiered age of consent as exists in some other European countries. That is very different to some pedo free for all.
|by Anonymous||reply 132||11/03/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 133||11/03/2017|
Asia Argento @AsiaArgento
#BryanSinger doesn't exist - #BrettRatner is "protected"
|by Anonymous||reply 134||11/03/2017|
@AsiaArgento He's going to get fucking busted.
@AsiaArgento Fight for truth every day. Shit is bound to surface and float.
|by Anonymous||reply 135||11/03/2017|
[QUOTE]Peter Tatchell kept bitching about lowering the age of consent in the UK as well.
Yes - because at the time the age of consent for hetrosexuals was 16, and for homosexuals was 18. He wanted it equalised. Fuck you for trying to make it seem sleazy.
|by Anonymous||reply 136||11/03/2017|
.@YahooEnt Why was your article on sexual assault allegations against Bryan Singer pulled down? (And FYI, the cached page is still visible.)
|by Anonymous||reply 137||11/03/2017|
I just got finished watching An Open Secret. These pervs seemed to go after boys they had figured out were probably gay. If they then told people they were abused, Singer, et al could claim consensual sex, the kid is gay. Here's a list of the guys he's slept with. Corey Feldman continued to have sex with one of these men because he claimed the guy had him hooked on drugs. There's a fine line. In the doc, one of the older guys in the biz who had given one of them a blowjob said he would never ever have done anything like that if he thought he was hurting someone or doing something to someone who didn't want it, as though a 65-year-old giving a 14-year-old a blowjob is something the kid would want. Maybe this film will stop parents from pimping their kids out to Hollywood pedophiles, because they're all still working in the business.
|by Anonymous||reply 138||11/03/2017|
Plus if they're gay but then want a movie career, they need to closet themselves - making it even more unlikely they'd ever step forward about the abuse, and giving Singer and his friends more power over them. I wonder how many times the threat of being outed was dangled over some of these guys.
|by Anonymous||reply 139||11/03/2017|
What about Roland Emmerich? How come no one is talking about this friend to Singer?
|by Anonymous||reply 140||11/03/2017|
Good point, r139. That makes me fucking furious.
|by Anonymous||reply 141||11/03/2017|
Aaron Carter is a good example, with that Lou Pearlman guy, including the whole emancipation from the family thing and being gay. Ugh. Pearlman was like the Harvey Weinstein of the gays.
|by Anonymous||reply 142||11/03/2017|
Watch this film if you can find it
|by Anonymous||reply 143||11/03/2017|
Besides being castrated Bryan Singer needs to cut back on the facial peels. He looks like a mutant from outer space.
|by Anonymous||reply 144||11/03/2017|
[quote]I wonder how many times the threat of being outed was dangled over some of these guys.
And no doubt there is photo evidence of these boys doing all sorts of things while drugged. They are probably being bombarded with threats of exposure as I type.
|by Anonymous||reply 145||11/03/2017|
Lou Pearlman. Truly one of the ugliest men who have ever walked to earth. Nothing worse than a fat pervert.
|by Anonymous||reply 146||11/03/2017|
Such a sick man
|by Anonymous||reply 147||11/03/2017|
Brad Bufanda, 34, killed himself yesterday by jumping from a building. A homeless man found him on the sidewalk at 1 a.m. Collateral damage?
"The former child star's other TV credits included Roseanne, CSI: Miami, Malcolm in the Middle, Boston Public and Days of our Lives.
In a statement Brad's management company spoke of their devastation.
'We are completely devastated for he was an extremely talented young actor and wonderful, caring human being,' they wrote.
|by Anonymous||reply 148||11/03/2017|
R130 didn't he delete his twitter account? Or was it just disabled?
|by Anonymous||reply 149||11/03/2017|
There's been rumours of Singer employing a fixer who has a posse of heavies and ex jailbirds who work for him. He apparently threatens the accuser with rape, if that doesn't work the heavies will be sent round and will rape the guy. A couple of the black ex gang members he uses are also supposed to be HIV pos. The threats are usually enough to make a lot of these people back down but if they don't they'll be attacked. He's worked for other clients besides Singer and the threats have been carried out. Some of these young kids have committed suicide because of this...
|by Anonymous||reply 150||11/03/2017|
Damn r150! That's horrible! Well hopefully someone will be brave enough, or have their own back up, to stand up to that. Maybe someone could touch base with a really good journalist to tell their story to and look into this, eventually exposing Bryan Singer. Most good journalists don't give a shit and are not easily intimidated.
|by Anonymous||reply 151||11/03/2017|
Wayne Castro looks like he's HIV+.
|by Anonymous||reply 152||11/03/2017|
R138, I don't know...Muriel Hemmingway had a creepy story of her parents actively urging her to go to Paris with Allen when she was a teen (after Manhattan) despite her discomfort.
|by Anonymous||reply 153||11/03/2017|
Is Bryan Singer’s prolapse imminent, that’s the REAL question.
|by Anonymous||reply 154||11/03/2017|
Wasn't there a story on another thread about how Singer is really a nelly submissive queen.
|by Anonymous||reply 155||11/03/2017|
From the Yahoo article:
[quote]Allegations against Singer have been simmering for a long time. As pointed out by the Daily Beast, in 1997, Singer reportedly “made minors shower in the nude on film for Apt Pupil.” Underage extras claimed that Singer “had required them to strip naked for hours while he shot a shower scene.” The allegations resulted in a lawsuit, but after the L.A. district attorney’s office investigated, the suits were dismissed.
Of course the suits were dismissed. Los Angeles is as much of a "company town" as it was in the 1930s. A few phone calls and the problem is fixed.
|by Anonymous||reply 156||11/03/2017|
An explanation from The Forward about why they deleted their Singer story:
An Editor’s Note About Bryan Singer
November 3, 2017 By Forward Staff
Our source for an aggregated story published about ‘X-Men’ director Bryan Singer, was Yahoo News. When they took their story down we removed ours, too, as we could not independently confirm the sources originally cited.
The Daily Wire is the last one standing with their Singer story.
|by Anonymous||reply 157||11/03/2017|
I think someone is behind this, maybe they were paid off or something to delete the story.
|by Anonymous||reply 158||11/03/2017|
Singer played a Jeffrey Epstein-like role. If he goes down, then all the secrets come out. He was an abuser but also a procurer.
|by Anonymous||reply 159||11/03/2017|
Our Singer thread from 2014 closed so can't bump it
|by Anonymous||reply 160||11/03/2017|
Did Singer ever procure for Geffen?
|by Anonymous||reply 161||11/03/2017|
Just a note about Geffen: He recently opened a private K-12 on the campus of UCLA called, what else, Geffen. The school could be in trouble if Geffen gets hammered.
|by Anonymous||reply 162||11/03/2017|
It really is funny how Seth McFarlane documented all of this on his show.
|by Anonymous||reply 163||11/03/2017|
Allegations against Singer connect back to long ago Dicaprio pal Dana Giacchetto
|by Anonymous||reply 164||11/03/2017|
Does Family Guy ever get sued?
|by Anonymous||reply 165||11/03/2017|
It's stunning how the floodgates have opened and all of these victims have started appearing day after day in the news impacting the lives of different celebrities all over the world. Used to be you'd get like maybe one scandal every few years.
|by Anonymous||reply 166||11/03/2017|
Good article @R164 for those who want more background on DEN and the scumbags who founded it.
|by Anonymous||reply 167||11/03/2017|
For what, R165? Telling the truth?
|by Anonymous||reply 168||11/03/2017|
Patricia ArquetteVerified account @PattyArquette 9h9 hours ago @Corey_Feldman I know you have carried this weight along time. Just know you have support.
Skylady @Skylady1963 2h2 hours ago Why did it take until now for you and all your rich Hollywood buddies to stand up for the victims of the rapists/abusers/pedophiles in Hollywood? You all took your money and didn't give the victims a thought! SHAMEFUL!
Patricia ArquetteVerified account @PattyArquette Replying to @Skylady1963 @Corey_Feldman Brock Turner dumb ass. Look up Bryan Singer case idiot.
|by Anonymous||reply 169||11/03/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 170||11/03/2017|
[quote]You all took your money and didn't give the victims a thought! SHAMEFUL!
I agree with Skylady
|by Anonymous||reply 171||11/03/2017|
Has Michele Clunie said anything yet?
|by Anonymous||reply 172||11/03/2017|
"but if an adult man is gay, or bisexual he's not going to be sexually attracted to kids or teenagers at all period."
You can be attracted to teen boys as well as adult men.....just like plenty of straight men are attracted to teen girls as well as adult women. When rock stars bang 14-year-old groupies no one says they aren't straight, just pedophiles
|by Anonymous||reply 173||11/03/2017|
Jessica ChastainVerified account @jes_chastain
Let us not forget
Attention Circles Back Onto Director Bryan Singer's Past Sexual Assault Allegations
|by Anonymous||reply 174||11/03/2017|
Asia ArgentoVerified account @AsiaArgento 2h2 hours ago
Attention Circles Back Onto Director Bryan Singer's Past Sexual Assault Allegations
|by Anonymous||reply 175||11/03/2017|
I'm sure poor Brad Renfro would have some things to say if he were still alive. Remember the scandal of the underage boys in the shower in Apt Pupil?
|by Anonymous||reply 176||11/03/2017|
Singer has superpowers...teflon powers. The guy is just plain creepy and yet nothing sticks.
|by Anonymous||reply 177||11/03/2017|
Sorry, Infowars video. Where are the media sites on the left?
If the right-wing sites like Daily Caller aren't afraid of lawyers why are the ones on the left buckling?
|by Anonymous||reply 178||11/03/2017|
R148 why did he KHS? Rest in peace.
|by Anonymous||reply 179||11/03/2017|
Interesting considering Chastain is starring in the Singer produced X Men: Dark Phoenix movie.
|by Anonymous||reply 180||11/03/2017|
I noticed how the full version of an open secret was removed from youtube, and I just saw it up on there a few days ago.
You can still find the edited PG-13 version but you have to really search for it.
|by Anonymous||reply 181||11/03/2017|
I guess it's Pedo Power!
|by Anonymous||reply 182||11/03/2017|
R181 What's the difference between R version and PG-13 version of the docu?
|by Anonymous||reply 183||11/03/2017|
Nothing new under the sun, goes to the top. Look at this or who was on Epstein' s plane and island.
Doubt Spacey was doing little girls so there must have been young boys there...
|by Anonymous||reply 184||11/03/2017|
Side eyeing that Africa trip. Bill sure is handsy.
|by Anonymous||reply 185||11/03/2017|
R183 I was wondering the same thing. I watched it on Vimeo a couple days ago; all that was edited out was a few profanities
|by Anonymous||reply 186||11/03/2017|
More from Jessica Chastain:
Jessica ChastainVerified account @jes_chastain 17m17 minutes ago If a victim gets cease&desist letter for reporting sexual harassment odds are its intimidation. Last thing they want is a discovery process.
Jessica ChastainVerified account @jes_chastain Im not a lawyer but I was told this by someone in the know. I want to encourage victims to speak up and feel they have support.
|by Anonymous||reply 187||11/03/2017|
Chastain is amazing. Hopefully this will finally get the ball rolling. About time!
|by Anonymous||reply 188||11/03/2017|
Either get the ball rolling, or she knows something's about to hit. And I don't mean that in a negative way, but for an actress to speak out against a producer on one of her most recent projects - that takes more than just hearing some random rumours, surely.
|by Anonymous||reply 189||11/03/2017|
Someone asks Chastain on Twitter: "Aren’t you starring in an X-Men movie he is producing?"
Jessica Chastain Verified account @jes_chastain 1h1 hour ago: "I didn't realize he was involved until recently. I had no dealings with him and he wasn't on set."
|by Anonymous||reply 190||11/03/2017|
I like Chastain a lot. But that is some bulllllshit answer on her part. Singer has directed 4 X-Men films, including the last two. That’s like saying you didn’t know Zach Snyder helmed DC movies, or that Kevin Feige is the overlord on all things Marvel. It’s Singer’s franchise. He produces the movies and the tv shows. She can’t not have known that.
|by Anonymous||reply 191||11/03/2017|
The Machine was designed to taint everyone who came in contact with it. This helped to keep people quiet. There really are no innocents in Hollywood as the system corrupted everyone.
There are no reports of Chastain actively abusing or assaulting anyone so she is fine.
|by Anonymous||reply 192||11/03/2017|
R190 Singer may just have a legacy EP credit due to his originating the characters continuity in his first X-Men film. For example, Christopher Nolan gets EP credit for Justice League because they are using Henry Cavill as Superman which Nolan originated in Man of Steel (which he produced), but he himself did no work on Justice League.
|by Anonymous||reply 193||11/04/2017|
It's funny how in 2009 Querry covered the Singer-Emmerick pool parties as a too-bad-you-weren't-there affair. This was before all the allegations of rape that would follow in 2014:
[quote]Whenever there’s something gay in Los Angeles, there is always an after party at 2012 director Roland Emmerich’s estate. With Valkyrie director-producer Bryan Singer at his side, the A-gays gather to pay their respects — before stripping down to their Speedos and diving into the pool. With West Hollywood’s gay pride parade yesterday, it only made sense Emmerich would once again open up his gates to LA’s gays. One attendee sends photo evidence of the fracas, which came complete with Candis Cayne performing with a Jaws theme (she ended up in getting “attacked,” ended up in the pool, and “blood” going everywhere) — although the photos shuttled to our inbox shows less performance, more “attempting to stand.”
[quote]Alas, we cannot confirm whether involuntarily adult film star Dustin Lance Black attended last night’s soiree, as he’s been known to.
[quote] And sorry, no photos of the after-after party (which generally has a clothing-optional policy), nor do we have pictures from what happened when Roland and Bryan took a few select young men into the house for private casting sessions.
|by Anonymous||reply 194||11/04/2017|
R148, are you saying there is some connection between Brad Bufanda's suicide and Bryan Singer?
|by Anonymous||reply 195||11/04/2017|
So happy to see the Bryan Singer stories getting more publicity. He’s worse than Spacey.
|by Anonymous||reply 196||11/04/2017|
[quote]Singer may just have a legacy EP credit due to his originating the characters continuity in his first X-Men film.
That’s not the case with Singer. He doesn’t have a mere legacy credit. Both his Instagram and (now deleted) Twitter show his continuing active involvement in the X films up to and including Dark Phoenix. He’s been the name behind the series for 17 years.
Again, I support Chastain, but her answer just makes no sense.
|by Anonymous||reply 197||11/04/2017|
From an article linked above, I discovered Brock Pierce is from my hometown in Minnesota. Never thought I’d read my city on Datalounge.
This article is circulating on Twitter - though it’s from 2014, goes into some details relating to the DEN / pedo crew
|by Anonymous||reply 198||11/04/2017|
Someone must be protecting Singer! There's just as much dirt out there on Singer as there was on Spacey. However, why isn't anything being reported in the mainstream press?
|by Anonymous||reply 199||11/04/2017|
R148 I saw that story the other day. I wondered about it myself due to the timing. Very sad.
|by Anonymous||reply 200||11/04/2017|
[QUOTE]Again, I support Chastain, but her answer just makes no sense
Not necessarily. If she was a fan of the X Men films, then yes she would've known Singer was attached. But if she wasn't, if this was just a project offering a lot of money to her, it is possible she was unaware of his involvement. And she doesn't exactly seem like the type to have a deep interest in comic book films.
|by Anonymous||reply 201||11/04/2017|
He has different connections - powerful people are protecting him to protect themselves.
|by Anonymous||reply 202||11/04/2017|
[quote] powerful people are protecting him to protect themselves.
Then the exposé sounds like a job for Ronan Farrow!
|by Anonymous||reply 203||11/04/2017|
The fact that he was able to pull all those news stories within hours of them being published is a sign that he has some very powerful connections.
|by Anonymous||reply 204||11/04/2017|
Why the audio in this article is not available ?
Bret Easton Ellis: I Was Invited to a Bryan Singer ‘Underage’ Party (Audio)
|by Anonymous||reply 205||11/04/2017|
[quote]powerful people are protecting him to protect themselves
Yes. No one wants Singer spilling the beans to get a better deal should he be arrested.
Also, Singer makes a lot more money for the industry than Spacey does.
|by Anonymous||reply 206||11/04/2017|
R183 I'm not sure I saw the original one that was about 2.5 hours long, and the PG-13 version has footage cut and is only maybe 1.5 hours long.
|by Anonymous||reply 207||11/04/2017|
R205 nobody should be surprised at hearing that. Ellis seems to like younger men but they are all adults and well over age 18 or 21.
|by Anonymous||reply 208||11/04/2017|
I remember when a former male prostitute posted here on DL years ago about being at Bryan Singer parties and how there were lots of underage guys, drugs, and barebacking and all sort of nasty kinky sex including scat.
[quote]Okay, if we're doing this. %0D %0D Right after college, 2002, I moved to LA. I lived with a guy who was a rentboy. I was a waiter and needed some quick cash and he suggested it. I did it for about six months and made between $10K-$15K.%0D %0D I did a Bryan Singer party. It was one of the most degrading experiences of my life. I was totally used. No condoms (got paid extra)and me and some other guy just hung out in a bedroom all night and random guys would come and fuck us. We couldn't leave the room. The pool area was reserved for the younger rents, I was 22 and was considered young but not young enough for the pool/patio area. %0D %0D One of my regulars was an actor on the show Alias, not BC. He was a great tipper. He got pissed at me when I quit. He hooked me up with another actor from a canceled 90s NBC sitcom who liked to pay for overnights. %0D %0D I also had a threeway with a well known tv director (a former HBO show (Hey Now!) and a former FOX comedy and a current NBC comedy with Tina Fey) and his boyfriend.%0D %0D %0D %0D
[quote] I didn't have HIV then and I don't have HIV now. I was 22, broke, and very, very lucky. %0D %0D I got $1500 for the Singer party.%0D %0D My rates were pretty standard. $200 for a single out call. That didn't include tip. %0D %0D $300 for a three way, but I would only do three ways in hotels, unless it was someone famous. %0D %0D Overnights and weekends were neogotiable. %0D %0D And yes, I would bareback for additional cash. Again I was stupid and very lucky. The only ones who wanted to bareback were the married dudes in town for a conference or a convention. Directors and producers are also big into barebacking. With actors its mostly coke and oral and a lot of body worship.%0D %0D It was also extra if you wanted me to cum. %0D %0D
[quote]Except for the barebacking, I don't really have any regrets about it. I got in, made the money I needed to make, and then moved on to a legit life. Yeah, I could have gotten a second job, but, at the time, this was easier.%0D %0D I was 22 and looked 17, my market was older guys into a young twink look. Even though I didn't look young enough to be in the pool area at Singer's, I still looked young enough to be one of the bedroom fuck boys. %0D %0D Singer, through his people, had very stringent criteria for the guys at his parties. You had to be a twink, not your standard twink, but a young looking twink. The younger you looked the better spot you got at the party. %0D %0D Pool/patio was the best area. Second best was putting on a sex show with a fellow worker. They watched you, but couldn't touch you. Low tier was bedroom fuck boy; you got paid the most, but you had to put out for anyone who wanted it. %0D %0D It wasn't Michael T. Weiss. %0D %0D I recevied tips all the time, especially for a really good session. The role players were the best tippers. I was always the "nephew", the "stepkid", the "horny neighbor kid." A lot of these guys were really into younger/older role play. You would be surprised. %0D %0D I once got offered $1000 to Cleveland Steamer a dude, but wouldn't do it. Thought about it, but decided not to. %0D %0D The "Alias" guy was very nice to me, but he seemed very sad all the time. %0D %0D The roommate who kinda got me into it, is still doing it. I don't judge him, but I feel bad for him. %0D
[quote]Other than Singer, I've given more than enough clues. I will say this, everyone has been named in this thread, except for the 90s sitcom guy. Here's a clue about the sitcom guy. It was an NBC sitcom. Set in New York City about 30somethings. The main lead did some 80s movies.
[quote]They're grown adults!!! Honey, if they were grown adults Miss Singer wouldn't want them at one of her parties....
|by Anonymous||reply 209||11/04/2017|
^^I remember reading that. It should be posted all over social media, because it's very believable.
As a longtime DL'er, I particularly love this little nugget:
[quote]The role players were the best tippers. I was always the "nephew", the "stepkid", the "horny neighbor kid." A lot of these guys were really into younger/older role play.
Sounds like Singer's pool parties were crawling with DL eldergays. LOL.
|by Anonymous||reply 210||11/04/2017|
Also from the thread: [quote]Singer is the only one people will talk about because he is out. He is obsessed with barely legal age boys (there was a storyline in US QAF that mirroed Singer). He hand picked Nicholas Hoult to be his next star - Jack the Giant Slayer flopped though.
His parties have a lot of celebrity guest. I know Hugh Jackman has been as well as Taylor Lautner.
|by Anonymous||reply 211||11/04/2017|
Was Lautner meant as a guest though or as a party favor?
|by Anonymous||reply 212||11/04/2017|
SO it seems Bryan Lourd will want Singer’s unscathed because that will allow Lautner to be free of scandals too..... especially since Lautner is now dating/bearding his daughter.
|by Anonymous||reply 213||11/04/2017|
No one cares about Lautner and his nonexistent career.
|by Anonymous||reply 214||11/04/2017|
R213 Lautner and Lourd's daughter broke up.
|by Anonymous||reply 215||11/04/2017|
NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! I thought they would last forever!
|by Anonymous||reply 216||11/04/2017|
I also remember this thread at R209. If I were him, I'd blackmail some of these dudes. A couple thousand a night isn't nearly enough if you're fucking big names.
|by Anonymous||reply 217||11/05/2017|
It looks like Little St. James Island is where it all goes down. If you fuck kids outside the country, can they still sue?
|by Anonymous||reply 218||11/05/2017|
The 90s sitcom r209 is referring to sounds like The Single Guy starring Jonathan Silverman. The make costars were Mark Moses and Joet Slotnik.
|by Anonymous||reply 219||11/05/2017|
Singer is protected for various reasons. He knows other guys like him (who like their sex partners underage), he runs one of the most profitable franchises in Hollywood, Hollywood cannot afford to look more and more like a haven for predators preying on people, using them, and throwing them away like trash.
The mainstream media is owned by people who don't like this sort of too close to the truth attention, but social media forces their hand. That's why the battle is faught on social media with trolls, bots, and shills trying to discredit and silence whoever raises his voice and threatens the evil, corrupt Hollywood system.
|by Anonymous||reply 220||11/05/2017|
sorry, hat's why the battle is FOUGHT on social media
|by Anonymous||reply 221||11/05/2017|
A blind item that's news to me.
A reporter needs your help. They know you will figure out the name in this blind and hopefully you will know something that will help bring this celebrity down. They are A+ list at what they do. If you turn on this cable network, you will feel they are on almost all of the 24 hours in the day. Of course if you manage to watch him for longer than five minutes, you must have it on mute or have lost your remote control. According to a very close family member, this host/celebrity has raped multiple young boys. He is paying people off and many of the boys he has raped have been family members so it is a very closely held secret. The reporter is afraid everyone will be bought off before he can be exposed. So, send me tips to send to the reporter. Sean Hannity
|by Anonymous||reply 222||11/05/2017|
While Singer hosts these private parties it's his associates who do all the dirty work like precuring / grooming the boys, buying the illegal drugs, etc. Even if officials would arrest Singer his lawyer would get him free by insisting that Singer never committed any illegal act and one of his associates comes forward and takes full responsibility and claims that Singer knew nothing.
|by Anonymous||reply 223||11/05/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 224||11/05/2017|
Only stone-cold proof (as in recordings) of him having sex with a minor would bring Singer down. But Singer has people around him who protect him and make sure there are no recording devices around when Singer is high on drugs and having sex with minors. However recordings exist of members of Singer's inner circle committing illegal acts that can be used against them if they step out of line. That's how these networks work. The leader / queen bee creates a club where the members have to do something (usually disgusting and / or illegal) to join the club.
|by Anonymous||reply 225||11/05/2017|
R225 = idiot
Kevin Spacey got brought down without recordings. Someone credible just has to speak up.
|by Anonymous||reply 226||11/05/2017|
[quote]Kevin Spacey got brought down without recordings.
Because he doesn't have the powerful back-up system that Singer has.
Netflix is new. It is no established threatening power system with a tight grip to make stories go away. The guys covering for Bryan Singer have that power as proven by articles and Twitter messages being deleted. They made Noah Galvin apologize for the comment he made about Singer in that Vulture interview.
[quote] = idiot
Right back at you.
|by Anonymous||reply 227||11/05/2017|
Sorry, It HAS no established ....
|by Anonymous||reply 228||11/05/2017|
R222 The "host/celebrity" who seems to be on a cable network 24/7 is Guy Fieri. Food Network runs 12+ hour blocks of nothing but Diners, Drive-ins, and Dives. He also has other shows as well.
[quote]If you fuck kids outside the country, can they still sue?
Probably not. Issues of jurisdiction are complicated.
|by Anonymous||reply 229||11/05/2017|
Sir Ian looks happy as a clam hanging out with Singer, are there any famous gay men who don't run with his crowd or write about teens like Savage?
|by Anonymous||reply 230||11/05/2017|
Spacey knows where the bodies are buried, certainly with Singer. Maybe Spacey will bring down Singer along with him
|by Anonymous||reply 231||11/05/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 232||11/05/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 233||11/05/2017|
[quote] I was 22 and was considered young but not young enough for the pool/patio area.
Interesting how he segments them.
|by Anonymous||reply 234||11/05/2017|
Salva served his time, R232 and why is that Winters speaking up again now after all these years? His story seems a little off and honestly, not all of it rings true. I know he was molested but I don't buy into the pedo ring conspiracies.
|by Anonymous||reply 235||11/05/2017|
WTF, R235? His story sounds completely credible to me. In fact, the grooming he describes is textbook (slowly escalating, gaining trust, declarations of love). It's the same M.O. the abused kids in Open Secret (documentary) talked about.
And....Salva served his time? You dumb fuck. Anywhere else in the country, and in any other industry, this sick creep would NEVER be permitted access to children. For life.
|by Anonymous||reply 236||11/05/2017|
Is Salva a registered sex offender or was he charged before the registered sex offender regulation?
|by Anonymous||reply 237||11/05/2017|
No one else has come forward and accused Salva, R236. You're right about the grooming, but I kind of doubt the whole stalking/intimidation tactics. Disney apparently didn't know he was a sex offender, so it's not like they knowingly let him around children.
|by Anonymous||reply 238||11/05/2017|
Powerful men for whom being surrounded by young teenagers can be a mark social status...where are we talking about again? Lots of parallels....
Politicians setting these policies - how many were on the Lolita Express? Hypocritically raising funds and preaching about human rights abuses?
The stories out of US, UK, Netherlands, Afganistan - are there societies where the elites don't prey on kids?
|by Anonymous||reply 239||11/05/2017|
Try posting the name of Singer's baby mama and see how quickly that post gets deleted.
|by Anonymous||reply 240||11/05/2017|
Insecure people seek power to feel worthy. It's like a drug where they need to affirm their power over others to feel worthy, because only people with power (which includes money) have worth. And for them there is no greater proof of having power than to commit a heinous crime and getting away with it. All this "child loving" and bevolent "mentoring" is just "I have the power to assault and exploit kids and get away with it!".
Insecure people are also easy to manipulate. You exploit their insecurities and they will do anything for you when you humor them and their insecurities or vices. Kindred spirit 'n all. All these pedo and satan cults and secret societies are just theatrical means to manipulate the members to serve some higher up's agenda. These members think of themselves being so powerful but in reality they are being manipulated just like the masses are being manipulated.
|by Anonymous||reply 241||11/05/2017|
You saying Singer has pull on Datalounge owners, R240?
|by Anonymous||reply 242||11/05/2017|
Don't be silly R242.
|by Anonymous||reply 243||11/05/2017|
Michelle Clunie having a baby boy for Singer for $ sure seems like growing your own victim
|by Anonymous||reply 244||11/05/2017|
She's also listed as his "partner" on Wikipedia. I mean, it feels good to laugh again!
|by Anonymous||reply 245||11/05/2017|
She was 45, wonder if they used an egg donor and she was just a surrogate?
Hope the tot enjoys pools!
|by Anonymous||reply 246||11/05/2017|
[quote]She was 45, wonder if they used an egg donor
Very likely. If all she did was incubate the kid, she may have signed off her parental rights a la Debbie Rowe (Michael Jackson's baby mama).
|by Anonymous||reply 247||11/05/2017|
^^she rented out her womb for 20 pieces of silver.
|by Anonymous||reply 248||11/05/2017|
r248, even worse: For a brief guest spot on MTV's Teen Wolf.
|by Anonymous||reply 249||11/05/2017|
Read somewhere she got $1M
|by Anonymous||reply 250||11/05/2017|
R249 That's just sad.
|by Anonymous||reply 251||11/05/2017|
Poor kid, doesn't really have a chance, does he?
|by Anonymous||reply 252||11/05/2017|
At age 45, the chances of successful AI are nil unless donor eggs from a younger woman are used.
|by Anonymous||reply 253||11/05/2017|
This guy is much creepier than Kevin Spacey. At least Kevin doesn't have any kids, thank God.
|by Anonymous||reply 254||11/05/2017|
She will be busted for this. TRUST!
|by Anonymous||reply 255||11/05/2017|
The usual suspects....haven't googled all the names yet...scroll down and of course there's DLB.
|by Anonymous||reply 256||11/05/2017|
Ugh, Dustin Lance Black - someone who still hasn't said a single thing about Spacey. Just the way he got with Tom is so reminiscent of how predators work (and yes, I know Tom was legal at the time, doesn't make how they got together any less creepy)
|by Anonymous||reply 257||11/05/2017|
Exacty what R112 said. We (the Gen X) were the first to feel this was not normal or okay, but we were alone, young and unprotected. Then came the Millenials, and it turns out they feel the same (maybe even more) about these issues. Same with the Gen Z (or Y, never know their name). All these are adept at social media. This was not going to last for much longer. Same with racism, we're seeing a major shift as well. All those who want to keep the old world order are getting older and we don't want any more of it.
R112 said it better.
|by Anonymous||reply 258||11/05/2017|
No generation was ever comfortable being sexually exploited.
|by Anonymous||reply 259||11/05/2017|
But plenty of generations have been fine ignoring the discomfort of those victims so they didn't have to face some hard truths, R259. And that's the part the recent generations aren't accepting.
|by Anonymous||reply 260||11/05/2017|
R256 Are those suspects? Some of them look like potential victims.
|by Anonymous||reply 261||11/05/2017|
You have got to be kidding, R259. The 1970s were one big giant harrassment/rape party for the men and anyone who said or did anything about it was a "square".
|by Anonymous||reply 262||11/05/2017|
A friend used to be invited to Rock Hudson's pool parties in the 70s. Same thing. Different time.
|by Anonymous||reply 263||11/05/2017|
Never that simple. Life is about power. Social media is a tool that has only recently existed. The powerful can still openly pull published media articles even today. Read up on what tactics Singer uses to silence people.
Fight the power that renders victims alone and vulnerable, not prior victims or those with few options. Every generation thinks they are unique. Better chance of success if we keep our eye on the prize.
|by Anonymous||reply 264||11/05/2017|
R263 The difference is Hudson's guests weren't in their teens.
|by Anonymous||reply 265||11/05/2017|
Not sure that is true R265.
|by Anonymous||reply 266||11/05/2017|
R261 I think the innocent ones have their faces blacked out. Wayne Castro and Tommy Johnson are "scouts" who round up boys for BS.
R266 By all accounts--biographers, friends--Hudson had a type: "all-American," blond or light brown hair, 20s.
|by Anonymous||reply 267||11/05/2017|
Social media has made a world of difference to invisible minorities (lesbian, gay, bi), there's no denying that. That, plus increased mobility, etc
|by Anonymous||reply 268||11/05/2017|
What is that "Suspects" post from? CNN's Wolf Blitzer is on there.
|by Anonymous||reply 269||11/05/2017|
Justine BatemanVerified account @JustineBateman 3h3 hours ago Say what you want about Hollywood, but when all the abuse came to light, this town took action to try to prevent it from occurring again. /1
Altmusing @Floridalien Replying to @JustineBateman Luv u, but don't even try that moral high ground BS. Polanski? Woody? Dan Schneider? Bryan Singer? Puh-lease!
|by Anonymous||reply 270||11/05/2017|
[quote]When I started reading this it suddenly occured to me that if Singer gets dragged like Weinstein it could drag Hugh Jackman out. He is in that pic on the plane so you know he went to parties. All it takes is for one kid to mention him. Boy, will Deb be pissed.
|by Anonymous||reply 271||11/05/2017|
I have a Facebook friend named Joe Moe who is friends with Singer. He once posted about a visit from Singer, and in the pictures there were young boys with Singer. I wish I could find them now.
|by Anonymous||reply 272||11/05/2017|
R79 Hugh Jackman?
|by Anonymous||reply 273||11/05/2017|
Jesse Mac @JessetheMac Nov 4 More Replying to @ShaunKing Dude I was a lowly PA far from him in 2006 and was hearing that he (Spacey) and Bryan Singer liked teenage boys. Everyone knew!
|by Anonymous||reply 274||11/05/2017|
Bryan Singer's Obsession With Barely Legal Boys Was an Open Secret
|by Anonymous||reply 275||11/06/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 276||11/06/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 277||11/06/2017|
Inside Bryan Singer’s Wild ("wild"? try sad, buzzfeed) Hollywood World
|by Anonymous||reply 278||11/06/2017|
University of Southern California News, 11-6-17
Seven School of Cinematic Arts students have penned a petition asking USC to formally remove director Bryan Singer’s name from the institution on Monday. At the time of publication, the online petition had over 900 signatures, which included students and alumni.
The petition cites former accusations of sexual harassment, pedophilia and sexual assault against Singer, for whom the Division of Cinema and Media Studies is named.
“By continuing to associate Mr. Singer’s name with our University, USC is openly supporting a man who has been publicly accused of reprehensible sexual misconduct,” the petition said. “As USC students and alumni, we hold ourselves to a standard of respect, and the SCA administration’s actions are not representative of that standard.”
Emily Halaka and Adrian Vega-Albela Osorio, two co-writers of the petition, hoped to foster dialogue about sexual assault and harassment at SCA.
“We hope that the petition inspires more students to stand up for what we know is right, and inspires the SCA administration to make a change,” Halaka and Vega-Albela Osorio said in an email to the Daily Trojan. “As young filmmakers, we refuse to allow our futures to be permeated by power abuse. We refuse to sit quietly as harassment and assault continues around us.”
Singer has faced multiple lawsuits throughout his filmmaking career, including one in 1997 concerning child nudity on a film set, according to Entertainment Weekly. In 2014, Singer also faced allegations of sexually abusing a minor, according to court documents obtained by The Wrap.
However, lawsuits against Singer have mostly been dismissed before an official trial.
“We have known about the allegations against Singer for some time, as have many students — 20-plus years of media coverage on the multiple allegations against Singer have made his history a highly public topic,” Halaka and Vega-Albela Osorio wrote. “We hope that we, the student body of the USC School of Cinematic Arts, can continue to be an example for future generations entering the film industry, making changes little by little.”
|by Anonymous||reply 279||11/07/2017|
Why is Allen still Teflon?
|by Anonymous||reply 280||11/07/2017|
Gross old gays targeting teens and younger should be locked up for life. And clearly the Michelle Clunie woman is as much a sociopath as Singer is. Their kid is going to be a fun one.
|by Anonymous||reply 281||11/07/2017|
I wonder if anyone in the original cast of the X-Men knew about Bryan's "exploits".
|by Anonymous||reply 282||11/08/2017|
Anything on Emmerich? Should we look askance at any of the beauties in his films?
|by Anonymous||reply 283||11/08/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 284||11/08/2017|
I didn't post about the guy who committed suicide, but when I saw someone else did in this thread it freaked me out. Day after he died a BI said the death or suicide was related to this. So whoever posted without citing the BI, what do you know? I can't remember if he was suicidal because he was one of the kids or if they didn't think it was suicide.
Singer was pretty much out publicly, like a very thin glass closet, until stories started being printed on the net about the underage pool parties and he got sued. Then he came out as bi and had a kid. It's bullshit. He's gay.
|by Anonymous||reply 285||11/08/2017|
I really fear for his son. Singer seems completely depraved and without conscience. If Singer is brought down, I hope they take the baby away and make sure he's okay.
|by Anonymous||reply 286||11/08/2017|
[quote]It's bullshit. He's a pedo.
|by Anonymous||reply 287||11/08/2017|
WTFr286! Singer has a son? Dear God in heaven!
|by Anonymous||reply 288||11/08/2017|
[quote]I wonder if anyone in the original cast of the X-Men knew about Bryan's "exploits".
There was a blind item years ago claiming a female star walked in on a director having sex with a teen boy in a trailer during a shoot. She was apparently extremely upset and tried to raise hell about it saying she'd never work with him again. It was thought to be about Halle Berry and Bryan Singer, and apparently took place during the X2 shooting. Obviously the next film was directed by Brett Ratner. I believed in the blind so much that I was actually surprised to see Berry return as Storm in X-Men: Days of Future Past.
I've commented on Singer before and I've sort of been on his side in all of this. I don't really care if he's having sex with guys over 16 (if he's not forcing them to do anything that is). I moved on my own when I was 16 and I definitely wasn't a small kid any more. However yes I totally realize that a rich and powerful older man will be powerful in ways a guy in his late teens can't, so there definitely is a power imbalance, but still I don't necessarily think the younger one is only being exploited and is not getting anything back in return. Obviously things change if there's any kind of coercion going on. I never dated an older guy when I was in my teens so I'm probably not getting everything totally right. The only sexual thing I had with an oldie was when I was like 22 and had a one night stand with a guy in his 40s. That was ok but yes I get it's not totally comparable.
I talked about the whole Spacey/Singer thing with a good a friend of mine. We went to school together in our teens and sort of dated before I moved totally to guys. She has two boys now, aged 14 and 16, and when I said Singer seems to like guys around 16 she started fuming that those kids are way too young. I pointed out that we were fucking when she was 16 and I was 17 but she said she can't imagine her son having sex at 16 with anyone. Makes me wonder once again how many people here are females imagining their sons having older male lovers? It's not that I don't get it. I totally remember how creepy it was when some of our teen friends, girls usually, had sex with older guys (not that it happened that often). However it isn't always necessarily the older men or women calling the shots in those relationships, if you can call them that.
So I do get the points from both sides. Kids in their later teens aren't really kids any more, although now that I'm in my 40s I definitely view them as such, but then again I've met men over 20 who are mentally like little boys. Some people grow up faster. I myself am not into guys under 20 at all, although there's no denying I've watched some of the masculine ones cam at Chaturbate. I like manly men and they are usually found in 25+ guys. Twinks are not my thing but the thing is, since I'm slightly into women, I can definitely get why some men are into more feminine men. However I must point out that Spacey going after a 14 year old is just too much. At 14 you're just not mentally developed enough, although yes I get probably not even when you're 16 or 17 or 18 but still, there is a difference. BTW, if I get real proof that Singer has been fucking guys under 16 I definitely will drop him.
Sorry for the long post. I don't mean to sound like I'm ranting but I just feel things aren't as black and white as some people make them to be. I'm sensing homophobia with some of the comments here but I do realize it's a complex issue.
|by Anonymous||reply 289||11/11/2017|
While we patiently waiting for Singer's collapse, the rest of the world is going to hell. I mean, George Takei, really??? I feel like Singer will be the last man standing.
|by Anonymous||reply 290||11/11/2017|
R289, I encourage to think more broadly. We all mature at different rates due to upbringing, genetics, etc. Your 16 is not the same as my 16. At that age, I WAS still a small kid in terms of emotional maturity. I didn't start having mature, sexual relationships until age 19.
The laws in place are not suggestions. Establishing 18 as the age of consent is, I assume, because most 18-year-olds are prepared to make adult decisions. Most 16-year-olds are not.
|by Anonymous||reply 291||11/11/2017|
R291, the age of consent is 16 in most states. Some states even allow you to marry a 14 year old with parental consent.
|by Anonymous||reply 292||11/11/2017|
14y.o is not right under any law. I am sorry. I suppose as humanity evolves, the way humans develop changes as well. I would say the emotional and mental age of 18y.o in 18 century is probably equal to the same of 15y.o in our age.
|by Anonymous||reply 293||11/11/2017|
Empress Emmerich claimed he stayed in his bedroom during those infamous pool parties.......... yeah right. MS Singer will go down though. His sham bearding and his lust for illegal young boys will be he downfall.
|by Anonymous||reply 294||11/11/2017|
R289 Ever notice how pedo apologists attempt to link disapproval of their perversion to homophobia. Didn't work with Spacey, won't work with Singer.
[quote]the age of consent is 16 in most states
These laws are usually not so cut and dried. It might be 16 *if* the other partner isn't more than, say, 3 years older.
|by Anonymous||reply 295||11/11/2017|
R291, yes I do get that not all people mature at the same speed. The thing with Singer's pool parties is that weren't those guys there voluntarily, meaning that they themselves sought to attend them? Hard to see wallflowers going there, especially if they'd heard any rumors of them being practically porn parties. I assume the guys were open for sex. Obviously it's criminal if they were drugged and raped but I'm seeing pearlclutching about the idea of young men even sharing a sex party with older men. Yes obviously if the guys were only 14 it's wrong, no question about it. Were there really boys that young attending those parties? How the hell would you even find guys that young to attend adult parties?
[quote]The laws in place are not suggestions. Establishing 18 as the age of consent is, I assume, because most 18-year-olds are prepared to make adult decisions. Most 16-year-olds are not.
I do get your point and like I've said I've met guys over 20 who were emotionally like in their teens. I'm just assuming that people attending famous sex parties aren't exactly the ones living sheltered lives.
R295, don't even for a second pretend like there hasn't been tons of homophobia in threads about Singer over the years here. It's clear we've had homophobic females posting here. Like I've said show me the proof Singer is fucking guys under 16 or he's forced anyone to have sex with him and I stop defending him in any way. And no, Michael Egan doesn't do since he has totally ruined his credibility.
|by Anonymous||reply 296||11/11/2017|
No, R295, those "Romeo and Juliet" laws go as low as 13 years old. Age 16 is legal age even with an adult in many states. It's currently age 16 in all of Canada (it used to be age 14 until 2008).
|by Anonymous||reply 297||11/11/2017|
[quote]It's currently age 16 in all of Canada (it used to be age 14 until 2008).
It's 18 for anal sex though.
|by Anonymous||reply 298||11/11/2017|
It won't matter if 100 boys come forward, the pedo protectors and assault apologists will dismiss them.
Singer will have a hard time trying to discredit numerous victims, though. Unlike Egan, most won't have any skeletons in the closet to be exposed. And the juries won't be made up of DLers.
|by Anonymous||reply 299||11/11/2017|
Can we talk about Michael Egan's nose job?
|by Anonymous||reply 300||11/11/2017|
Why, r299, are you carrying on as if no one on DL has been in solid condemnation of all these pedo accusers? It's far more in the majority percentage of being against these guys. But really when are they going after Bryan Singer? What's all this stuff about him being too powerful or dangerous to go after? Sounds like a load to me.
|by Anonymous||reply 301||11/11/2017|
It won't be long now.
Maybe you need to rethink who you idolize.
|by Anonymous||reply 302||11/11/2017|
[QUOTE]I pointed out that we were fucking when she was 16 and I was 17
The utter stupidity of trying to compare two teens of similar ages having sex to a powerful Hollywood producer inviting young guys to sex parties, just so you can get to
[QUOTE]Makes me wonder once again how many people here are females imagining their sons having older male lovers?
Ah of course, it must be homophobic fraus who disagree with you, because all gay men have to think the same as you, right?
[QUOTE]I totally remember how creepy it was when some of our teen friends, girls usually, had sex with older guys (not that it happened that often). However it isn't always necessarily the older men or women calling the shots in those relationships, if you can call them that.
So, you think it's creepy except if the younger partner has the power. So do you actually think any of these young guys around Singer have any power at all?
[QUOTE]but still I don't necessarily think the younger one is only being exploited and is not getting anything back in return.
Oh, so it's okay to be exploited as long as they get something in return? So as long as the guy they plied with booze and drugs gets a bit part in X Men after he gets gang fucked by a bunch of sleazy old men, that's all okay then, is it?
What's notable about the pedo defenders is how they constantly search for a technicality. In this case it's the idea that these guys consented to be abused the way they were. So let's be clear - suggesting these guys consented to what they went through because they agreed to go to a party is like suggesting women consented to Harvey Weinstein's sexual assaults because they agreed to meet him in his hotel room.
|by Anonymous||reply 303||11/11/2017|
The ultra-creepy twins being discussed in the tweet @R302.
|by Anonymous||reply 304||11/11/2017|
Who is that twitter guy, R302? He looks a bit creepy himself.
|by Anonymous||reply 305||11/11/2017|
He's in love now.
|by Anonymous||reply 306||11/11/2017|
R305 Your idea of shooting the messenger?
But thanks for proving my point.
|by Anonymous||reply 307||11/11/2017|
Inside the Hollywood Sex Ring Mansion From the Bryan Singer Lawsuit
|by Anonymous||reply 308||11/11/2017|
Nothing to see here. Move along. Every twink I've been with has been barely legal. Barely , but completely legal.
So production companies that invest in my projects, please don't worry about losing all your money. I've always done stuff as barely legal as possible. Your money is safe with me and my drug-infested, barely-legal, pool-party reputation. Feel better?
Here's my resume picture which you can find all over the internet. Please ignore the twink with the dead eyes sitting on my lap.
|by Anonymous||reply 309||11/11/2017|
What little pig eyes Singer has. The total look of a pervert.
|by Anonymous||reply 310||11/11/2017|
[quote]What's notable about the pedo defenders is how they constantly search for a technicality.
Exactly, and R289 is a pedo himself for sure. The signs are all there---lit up in neon. You'd have to be seriously mentally deranged to try to compare two teenagers having sex to a middle aged manipulative predator drugging and raping kids.
And, no idiot R296, it doesn't matter how those kids got to the pool parties. They are not capable of consent, no matter what they do, what they wear or how they act. That's text book pedo-logic. Blame the poor kid for being where he should not have been. Are you trying to say that if a toddler wandered into your back yard you'd be entitled to rape him? Never mind, that's a dumb question. I know you'd answer it with an emphatic "YES"......and then accuse anyone who disagreed with you of homophobia.
|by Anonymous||reply 311||11/11/2017|
I don't think mainstream Americans have any idea who Bryan Singer is, And probably don't care really. Holidays are coming up. College Football. Taxes. Hollywood on the other hand will decide if he can stay in the club. Its Somebody new everyday now and the main question with all the straight and gay bi guys is more not was I sexually harassed but did impose myself. Its everyone now. Politicians hoteliers business leaders, people. I was hit on all the time growing up in my teens, 20's 30's. It was everything but my electric blue eyes was how it started. This has been going on from the beginning of time. This is a conversation every parent friend aunt uncle is having today. Nothing personal but not many people care anything about Bryan Singer.
|by Anonymous||reply 312||11/11/2017|
bryan singer looks like he could be the brother of serial murder queen luka magnotta.
|by Anonymous||reply 313||11/11/2017|
Did Singer ever look normal?
|by Anonymous||reply 314||11/11/2017|
Where is this idea coming from that people are more mature at a younger age now? I think it's the opposite.
Instead of moving out on our own at 18 now we go straight to college and spend another 4-7 years as students. Most of my friends in college were still dependent financially on their parents while being shielded from the Real World under the tent of academia. The pressure and expectation is higher but that doesn't mean we handle it any better. We marry later, have kids later, buy homes later (if ever).
Off topic to the rest of this post but has anyone here seen Singer in person and does he really look that ugly and lizard like or does he just photograph badly?
|by Anonymous||reply 315||11/11/2017|
Don't let your underage loved ones go unchaperoned. I as a very horny teen male would have figured out a way to go to those pool parties if I lived in L.A.. Look at the playboy mansion in plain sight. Not saying its right or wrong but the culture of America is being re calibrated right now.
|by Anonymous||reply 316||11/11/2017|
[quote]Exactly, and [R289] is a pedo himself for sure. The signs are all there---lit up in neon.
Nope, but keep telling yourself that. I pointed out that my friend refuses to believe her son would even have sex at 16 ("oh he's only such a child") when she herself loved fucking at 16. This is the kind of attitude I see here a lot, which makes me believe many people (not all obviously) that have been bitching about Singer over the years are homophobic females who think it's terrible if young men have sex with older men. They possibly think men having sex with men is super icky in the first place. And like I pointed out I'm talking about guys over 16. Yes at that age many guys are totally not yet adults but they are certainly not little kids any more. Like I said I don't really give a shit when people over 16 have sex. I don't fancy guys that young and I don't want to have sex with them but I don't really care if someone else does, and only obviously if the younger guy wants it as well. And please, stop with the whole pedo crap. Pedos have sex with pre-pubescent kids, not with people in their late teens like Singer seems to do.
[quote]You'd have to be seriously mentally deranged to try to compare two teenagers having sex to a middle aged manipulative predator drugging and raping kids.
I have a feeling you don't even pretend to have any kind of rational conversation, you just see a gay man having sex with younger men and it's immediately HE'S A PEDO!!!!! Like I said in R289: "BTW, if I get real proof that Singer has been fucking guys under 16 I definitely will drop him." Show me the proof Singer is guilty and I'll definitely stop defending him.
Let's not forget a few posts up someone said how creepy it is that Tom Daley is dating Dustin Lance Black. Why the fuck should I or you care? I'm sure Daley is mentally capable of making his own decisions, like I assume most people over 16 are. Maybe I'm giving too much credit for teens over 16 because like I said I moved out at 16 and went to live with people who were 16 as well. Most of us got on with life's realities totally fine. Maybe teens these days are so mentally undeveloped that they don't fucking understand what having sex even means and are easily manipulated into it.
|by Anonymous||reply 317||11/11/2017|
[quote] So, you think it's creepy except if the younger partner has the power. So do you actually think any of these young guys around Singer have any power at all?
R303, how the hell should I know? I don't really know that much about Singer's love life. Judging by earlier posts he's dating some Chaturbate model right now. You can't do Chaturbate shows unless you're 18 (you need to show them an ID) so I assume Singer is dating a guy over 18 at the moment. You have a problem with that? I assume the model is doing sex shows for money so it's not that hard to guess what is at least partly his motivation to be with Singer. Who's the more powerful one in the relationship? No idea. I assume the CB model can walk out any time he wants to.
[quote]Oh, so it's okay to be exploited as long as they get something in return? So as long as the guy they plied with booze and drugs gets a bit part in X Men after he gets gang fucked by a bunch of sleazy old men, that's all okay then, is it?
I should've pointed out that I meant being satisfied emotionally when I talked about younger men having affairs with older guys, or women. I assume not all spring/autumn relationships are about money. But really, if they are about money so fucking what? I'm over 40 now and if I had the money I'd definitely try it with a hustler. But not with some scrawny twink (eww). I'd go with some hustling muscle het (lol) and have a muscle worship session.
And really, R303, at this point you're presenting rumors as facts. If true sure that's terrible. Hollywood has been using the casting couch from the start and I'm glad things are finally being revealed, and thankfully it's not only gay men that are revealed to have abused their position. And dude, obviously if people are getting drugged and raped there needs to be police involved, no matter how old the victim. I've said it before and I say it now that there most certainly needs to be a better witness than Michael Egan who's pretty much lost all his credibility. And it didn't really help Amy Berg's An Open Secret that she decided to keep him in the doc.
That doc was a disappoinment btw. I'm glad it outed that one talent scout as an abuser but I don't understand why she even showed that guy who ended up having brain damage from booze. If I understood it correctly the guy was already over 18 when he moved to Hollywood. Then something (what?) happened and he moved back home, where he drank a lot. Sure he was involved with DEN and we all know Rector-Collier most definitely was into teen boys. DEN had a lot of investors, not just Singer. Were they all pedos or into teen boys? I'm not buying that, at least not right now.
|by Anonymous||reply 318||11/11/2017|
[QUOTE] I'm sure Daley is mentally capable of making his own decisions, like I assume most people over 16 are.
Is he? How about if you consider the fact that just months before he met DLB, Tom's dad died. Tom's dad, who was the same age, give or take 2 or 3 years, as DLB. And Tom's dad who played a huge and domineering role in his life. Now that puts a bit of a different spin on things doesn't it? But that doesn't fit into your bullshit narrative, where you keep trying to equate old men going after young guys as being the same as a 16 and 17 year old fucking.
[QUOTE]there most certainly needs to be a better witness than Michael Egan
How fortunate that there are then. Though I'm sure you just happened to have missed all of them, right? How convenient.
|by Anonymous||reply 319||11/11/2017|
R319, I'm sorry but how the fuck should I know what went on in Daley's head after his dad died. I wouldn't necessarily equate the affair with DLB with the dad's passing. Maybe Daley just is into older men. And no, I don't really like DLB. He seems to be kind of a cunt and I can't see what Daley sees in him but that's not something I really think a lot about.
[quote]How fortunate that there are then. Though I'm sure you just happened to have missed all of them, right? How convenient.
I don't doubt that Singer loves barely legal teen guys, that seems to be a fact. However him drugging and raping men is a whole different thing, and that most certainly has not been proved, at least not yet. And once again if that's proven to be correct I most definitely will stop defending him.
BTW, R319, it's slightly perplexing that you're in the Ed Westwick rape thread defending Westwick. I actually agree with you that the roommate's friend sounds like a scammer. I just though that since you seem to believe in rumors so much you'd most certainly believe what she's saying.
The thing with Singer is that people keep posting pics of him hugging young men like that's a crime. It's not, he's just into barely legal twinks. And I think that's the first problem some people have with Singer. They don't need any proof of him drugging and raping men, they believe it just based on them being appalled by Singer being into twinks.
|by Anonymous||reply 320||11/11/2017|
[quote]we all know Rector-Collier most definitely was into teen boys
When the cops arrested him in Spain they found 8,000 images of child sex abuse on his computer.
Brock Pierce is a virtual currency pioneer. He is now a multi millionaire and on the board of Bitcoin.
Steven Mnuchin and Geffin and Singer have, I believe, invested in pornography rackets. Including illegal abuse. Billions is made from that filth. And the investments are funnelled through off shore bank accounts and shell companies. Marc Collins-Rector and Brock Pierce were experts at this stuff and I believe Geffin wanted Collins-Rector dead (Brock Pierce told the FBI and a judge in a sworn deposition published by Buzzfeed who have done great reporting on DEN) because Geffin is involved in profiteering from child sex abuse. CDAN has a new blind that basically says Warners have discovered that Singer has invested in a filmed child abuse racket.
|by Anonymous||reply 321||11/11/2017|
Wow, r321--you have all the inside scoop! Tell us more!
|by Anonymous||reply 322||11/11/2017|
R321 read this..
97. ENTERTAINMENT LAWYER 11/08 **#13** The Studio: Want to know the most corrupt studio? It doesn't really exist any longer. It sure made a lot of money for the people who ran it though. It was like a giant ponzi scheme. The owners siphoned all the money; took money from investors; and even raided a bank to the tune of $100M before stashing it all overseas and declaring bankruptcy. Where did all the money go? Good question. A lot of it remains in offshore accounts. A bunch of other money though was spent on drugs and women and men and parties. This is the movie that Hollywood needs to make. Honestly, it involves many of the sexual predators that have been named over the past few weeks. Some of the owners of this place turned against each other and publicly said the same things years ago that are only now getting those same predators in trouble. No one cared before. Now they do. Lets go through some of the players shall we? A list public figure. John Oliver is a huge fan of this guy. Infamous wife. - In a previous blind, I wrote about how he met his wife. This was after he spent a few years at the studio passing out business cards to every blonde in town. Only blondes. Brunettes who knew about this would wear a wig because he was paying $10K for a night and would bring party favors. You needed those party favors to put out of your head who you were sleeping with. A cruel, cruel guy in bed. Those nights when he brought in a second woman were apparently the worst. Just a twisted f**k/. He is also the one who made it possible for everyone to flee with more money. Flee is a strong word. Get away with. Screw other people with by taking the money would be a good phrase too. A list director who so far has escape this round of scandal. He had big budgets and was allowed to do what he wanted with them. The studio covered all those payments to parents of minors who complained about him sexually assaulting their teen boys. The investors thought their money was going to movies, not to sexual assault payoffs. Another A list director. He was responsible for finding women for all the studio bosses. All of those casting calls and the executives would just happen to stop by where he would talk them up. Then, the executives would stand around watching and so many of those actresses would find the time to walk up to the executives and they just took their pick. The problem with this A list director is that he was stealing from the studio which later caused the executives to turn on the director. This Academy Award winning actor was a partner in the studio. He just used it as another avenue to find young boys. The thing is, he and the director who also liked young boys didn't always get along. Our director liked them young, but despite the payoffs always insisted everything was consensual. The actor liked things when they were not consensual. Just an evil guy. A list public figure. Foreign born. He specialized in throwing even more money around. He had the most of the bunch. He also had connections within an organization that not only helped launder money but also provided women as needed who were not actresses. There were some investors who enjoyed things more rough and if something happened to one of these women, they were shipped to some far corner of the world, deep underground.
Studio: Relativity Media
A list public figure/infamous wife: Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin/Louise Linton (John Oliver video)
A list director: Bryan Singer
Another A list director: Brett Ratner
Academy Award winning actor: Kevin Spacey
Foreign born A list public figure: James Packer
|by Anonymous||reply 323||11/11/2017|
...and then this
|by Anonymous||reply 324||11/11/2017|
and then this...
Yesterday and last night a studio (___________) was in crisis mode with executives flying in and lawyers summoned. All because this perverted jerk director (____________) and his company (_________) are such a major part of the studio's project slate that the studio itself may be in jeopardy - especially being taken over by a publicly traded company that requires Congress' approval. Last night during the investigation into the damage done by the director, and how damaged the studio can be, they discovered some bizarre business interests. Seems the director is a major investor-partner in several adult porn websites. The studio and even the director's managers didn't know it. One of the porn sites in particular is so disgusting, perverted, and possibly illegal in the USA that the studio is scrambling to cut all ties and remove the director from everything, before the media uncovers this. The site, hosted offshore and hidden beneath layers of front companies, is so awful that the analysts refused to explore it - and only finally did so after a lawyer and ex-FBI man at the studio both agreed to monitor the investigation. If the director and his pals see that website as their normal views of sex? Then those abuse allegations are just the beginning of his slide into the gutter. Even a national official (_______________) is scared. He sent a representative of his to meet studio brass all because of his own former association with the director which still reaps financial income for the official. They're trying to quietly cover up all ties to Russian investors and Arab investors before people start looking deeply at those relationships. Talk was swirling about the official (_______) and the director on a Russian billionaires yacht, with Arabs and lots of young women. Why? There is a video and photos. Not good for the studio and definitely not good for a Trump appointee at the moment. Meanwhile the studio is in damage-control mode, and one executive (______________) is rumored to be on the chopping block due to his defense of and friendship with the director. The studio is looking to scapegoat, cut ties, and dress up as a wholesome family company before its new owner (_________) has to go before Congress to get approval for lots of new plans. Many Congresswomen in particular are just waiting to get some re-election coverage by grilling them and forcing them to pledge to change the culture of Hollywood. If anyone thinks attorney Marty Singer can handle all this? They are clueless.
Answers (thanks, AGC!) Studio/executive: Warner Bros.
Jerk director/company: Brett Ratner/RatPac
National official: James Packer
Trump appointee: US Secretary of Treasury Steven Mnuchin
Executive: Len Blavatnik
|by Anonymous||reply 325||11/11/2017|
OMG, r323/r324/r325! Just...OMG!
I CAN'T EVEN!
|by Anonymous||reply 326||11/11/2017|
[QUOTE]you're in the Ed Westwick rape thread defending Westwick
Except I'm not. All I've done is point out the weaknesses in the story of the guy claiming to be a friend of the accuser and factual inaccuracies he's been telling about the BBC's response. I believe the most criticism I levelled at the accuser was her not naming the producer, given he was complicit. And she then did name him. Nice attempt at an ad hominem though.
[QUOTE]I don't doubt that Singer loves barely legal teen guys, that seems to be a fact. However him drugging and raping men is a whole different thing, and that most certainly has not been proved, at least not yet. And once again if that's proven to be correct I most definitely will stop defending him.
And it's nice to know you'd at least stop defending Singer once he's been convicted of a crime. I assume you also think OJ Simpson is innocent?
|by Anonymous||reply 327||11/11/2017|
29. ENTERTAINMENT LAWYER 11/02 **#14**
The Financier: Back in the day, he was an actor. A fairly successful child actor. As he started getting a little older, he played the game the way he was told. When he wasn't old enough to drive he was hooking up with that A list movie producer and that A list mostly movie director that keeps popping up. He spent most of his time though with a guy who taught him about money while also having sex with him. I say sex, but our actor was not yet legal so lets call it what it is - rape. The money guy schooled our actor on how to make money. Meanwhile, the actor was also used to bring in young male actors for the sick fantasies of the previously mentioned and also the sick fantasies of investors. I can't tell you how many child and teen actors ended up dead from drugs or booze or just suicide because of these a-holes. It hasn't stopped. Things have just slightly changed. The mentor of the actor has to lay low all the time now. He is always watched by authorities. The actor though can move freely. He makes a ton of money which is used to finance movies for the director and the producer. Almost every movie they change the name of the finance company to keep people off the trail. Where do they get the money? Politicians, executives and anyone else who wants to have sex with young boys. The actor has a supply chain from acting schools and casting calls to model hunts and everything in between. The former actor uses his political connections to make people guardians of some of these boys. Can you imagine the sick f**k who knows what is going to happen to these boys but approves a guardianship for the boy to live with the guy who is going to rape them? The thing is, people have spoken up. People have complained. You know what happens? Nothing. The voice gets hammered back down. Maybe some cash changes hands. Maybe the troubled youth ends up dead. A victim of the drug crisis or gun violence. The guardian did everything they could say the stories. Gave the youth a loving home. If you go back a decade, you will see the fields of Hollywood littered with the dead bodies of actors who were victimized by this group. The deaths might be publicized but not the aftermath. None of the dead actors ever get in a memorial during Oscar or Emmy night. They just are child or teen actors who couldn't handle fame. No, they are actors who couldn't handle being raped and living their lives after years of abuse.
Actor: Brock Pierce
Director: Bryan Singer
Producer: David Geffen
|by Anonymous||reply 328||11/11/2017|
Wow R325 you are an idiot. James Packer isn't a National Official, he's an Australian billionaire. The National Official IS Steve Mnuchin, the National Official and Trump Apointee aren't two different people. I read that blind item over three times, I don't know how you got the impression they were two different people. And the studio executive is Kevin Tsujihara, whose friendship with Ratner has already been scrutinized by the trades since the scandal broke. Leonard Blavatnik isn't a studio executive, he's a British businessman whose holding company, Access Industries, owns Warner Music Group, which was split off from Time Warner ages ago.
I am F&Fing you for being too stupid to live.
|by Anonymous||reply 329||11/11/2017|
R329 that wasn't even R325's guess, he was copying and pasting from AGC Blind Items and they're the ones who put the guesses in
|by Anonymous||reply 330||11/11/2017|
[quote] The thing with Singer is that people keep posting pics of him hugging young men like that's a crime. It's not, he's just into barely legal twinks.
But the environment has DRAMATICALLY changed overnight. Who would have guessed that sexual harassment allegations from 30 years ago could, in part, completely erase Kevin Spacey's career? Or Louis CK's? How the hell is this happening so fast? Projects costing millions of dollars are being shelved or canceled because of their past/current behavior. Investors are losing MONEY over this, which in Hollywood is probably more unforgivable than the sexual harassment of young men and women.
So, has Bryan ALWAYS been fucking legal-age twinks over that period? And are we sure that no one will come forward with Kevin Spacey-type harassment claims against him and explode his projects and endanger all those investor dollars?
That's Singer's problem now. He could be COMPLETELY innocent of having had sex with underage boys, but investors and studios will look at how he as lived his life and make assessments of risks. There may be no fire, but there sure is plenty of smoke enveloping Singer and the people he chose to hang with.
Does a taste for barely legal boys ever slip into underage/illegal during the last thirty years? Why even take that risk with Singer in the current "Me Too" environment? Just choose another director/producer with less associated sexual harassment risk.
That's a danger for his career going forward.
|by Anonymous||reply 331||11/11/2017|
R330 if you copy someone else's homework and all the answers are wrong, that still makes you an idiot.
|by Anonymous||reply 332||11/11/2017|
And as if "he likes hugging twinks" is it. Again - he was an investor in DEN which was run by pedophiles. Said pedophile had pool parties and the like, just as Singer has now, and Singer attended the pedo's parties.
|by Anonymous||reply 333||11/11/2017|
Drama! Bitchy repartee! I love it! Keep it up, bitches!
|by Anonymous||reply 334||11/11/2017|
[quote]Steven Mnuchin and Geffin and Singer have, I believe, invested in pornography rackets. Including illegal abuse. Billions is made from that filth.
Oh you believe. If I understood correctly from those CDAN (?) blinds it's Ratner who was involved with the porn. BTW, most people on this site, i.e. gay and bi men, probably don't find anything wrong with porn. Obviously it's hard to tell what this "possibly illegal in the USA" porn might be. The possibly illegal bit makes me think it's not really that terrible because it would probably be illegal then.
I most certainly wish anyone involved with kiddie or teen porn is caught BUT what the hell has this got to do with Singer? Just because YOU believe something is true doesn't make it such.
R327, I'm also trying point out with Singer that blind items like [R323]/[R325]/ should not be exactly presented as the truth. I'm fairly certain OJ was not innocent. The jury's still out about Westwick.
BTW, we all know how unreliable CDAN blinds can be. IF they are correct I wish the truth comes out soon. Why isn't there some deep investigative journalism happening? At this point much of this stuff (especially the conspiracy theory like blind items) sounds like coming from she-who-should-not-be-named, who seems to be a total homophobic cunt.
[quote][R329] that wasn't even [R325]'s guess, he was copying and pasting from AGC Blind Items and they're the ones who put the guesses in
The blind item in question is from CDAN as well.
|by Anonymous||reply 335||11/11/2017|
Brock Pierce's deposition from his 2003 court appearance in Miami
'Marc [Collins-Rector] thought Geffen was going to kill him'.
|by Anonymous||reply 336||11/11/2017|
[quote]If I understood correctly from those CDAN (?) blinds it's Ratner who was involved with the porn.
Yes, and Geffin and Singer were investors in DEN, run by Collins-Rector and Brock Pierce and Chad Shackley, who were organising parties with under-age kids for their investors and running numerous shell companies and off-shore investment funds involving virtual currencies. All that, in my view, adds up to filming and selling of sexual abuse.
|by Anonymous||reply 337||11/11/2017|
R337, DEN had tons of investors.
|by Anonymous||reply 338||11/11/2017|
[QUOTE]I most certainly wish anyone involved with kiddie or teen porn is caught BUT what the hell has this got to do with Singer?
How about him (and Geffen) giving a bunch of money to a pedo to fund him bringing in young boys to Hollywood to make "content" and then having those boys available for sex at parties? And since you need court opinions to back up everything, me saying he's a pedo isn't opinion - Marc Collins Rector was convicted of child enticement and admitted luring five minors across state lines for sexual purposes.
|by Anonymous||reply 339||11/11/2017|
[quote]The blind item in question is from CDAN as well.
AGC collates all the recent blinds
|by Anonymous||reply 340||11/11/2017|
R337 who should all be investigated by the authorities. Including Geffin and Singer.
|by Anonymous||reply 341||11/11/2017|
And how many of those investors attended Collins Rector's parties, R338?
|by Anonymous||reply 342||11/11/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 343||11/11/2017|
miriam margolyes said that on a film with schwarzeneggar, if you were pretty and attractive on the set he treated you all flirty and fawning. but if he wasn't interested in you sexually he was mean and rude. she said for a scene where she was tied down and couldn't be moved for hours, arnold would come over when he needed to fart. he'd squat down and let them blow in her face. i think that's just as abusive. she was humiliated but couldn't say much about the big star.
|by Anonymous||reply 344||11/11/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 345||11/11/2017|
His collapse has been "imminent" for years now.
|by Anonymous||reply 346||11/11/2017|
I know this will get lost in this thread because people don’t click on links but it’s definitely worth reading.
[quote]A Silent Wave of Deletions: Why Allegations Against Singer Have Been Disappearing
It’s not necessarily new information but it is a good compilation. I almost created a separate thread but DL is already on overload these days.
To quote one part of the post:
[quote]One theory - and to be clear, we ARE dealing in theories and rumors here - is that Singer is too big to fail. He's both a commercially successful and critically acclaimed director as well as producer, and Hollywood hates to see talent go to waste. He's working with 20th Century Fox on Bohemian Rhapsody and X-Men: Dark Phoenix, to name just two of his projects.
[quote]Another theory is my personal pet theory and a little more insidious. Maybe Singer isn't protected of what he does, but rather because of who he knows, and what he knows about them. The list of his known associates is an illustrious one.
|by Anonymous||reply 347||11/11/2017|
You know that awful Steve Bannon guy is connected with Marc Collins-Rector et al. I wonder if he's a sex creep.
|by Anonymous||reply 348||11/11/2017|
Bryan Singer is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.
|by Anonymous||reply 349||11/11/2017|
I’ve had enough of r335. Blocked
|by Anonymous||reply 350||11/11/2017|
Hm, I never realised Michael Huffington was an investor in DEN too. He's mentioned in the other thread linked to those awful twins.
This link is to a bridging finance agreement that had to be signed by the investors in DEN at the time - interesting to see some of the names listed. Seeing that Marc Collins-Rector is listed as a custodian for Scott Shackley makes my skin crawl - Shackley went to high school with Egan, and essentially was how Egan got involved with DEN.
|by Anonymous||reply 351||11/11/2017|
[quote]I’ve had enough of [R335]. Blocked
Quelle surprise that R350 is a trans-hating female. Are you one of those right winger homophobic cunts who've stunk up the place for quite some time now?
R350 from the 'To the Women on DataLounge - Lesbian or Straight' thread:
[quote]It’s why we don’t want transwomen, aka bio males, in our bathrooms. But because we are women, we have no say who is in allowed in our spaces.
|by Anonymous||reply 352||11/11/2017|
[quote] Seeing that Marc Collins-Rector is listed as a custodian for Scott Shackley makes my skin crawl -
Shackley's parents allowed Chad to move to LA with Collins-Rector when he was about 16. He was 15 when Collins-Rector started 'dating' him.
|by Anonymous||reply 353||11/11/2017|
[quote]Maybe Singer isn't protected of what he does, but rather because of who he knows, and what he knows about them. The list of his known associates is an illustrious one.
This seems likely. He's been more of a liability than an asset for a while now. These days he's a real black eye on an industry that already looks sleazy as fuck. If he doesn't go down, he definitely has dirt on powerful people.
|by Anonymous||reply 354||11/11/2017|
Is THIS Bryan Singer's demise? This article has everything you know you want--Bryan Singer, witch hunts, pedos, SJWs (2500 of 'em!) AND an appearance by Jessica Chastain.
|by Anonymous||reply 355||11/11/2017|
^AND a crying frau mother.
|by Anonymous||reply 356||11/11/2017|
From the article at R355:
[quote]Egan ultimately withdrew his lawsuit after turning down a $100,000 settlement from Singer with an option to re-file at any time.
Wow, I wouldn't offer $100,000 to shut up someone who wasn't telling the truth. Egan should have taken the money before Singer's goons got the dirt to smear him.
|by Anonymous||reply 357||11/11/2017|
THIS has just as much everything--Bryan Singer, veteran actor Anthony Edwards, rapey mentors, dads with PTSD...
|by Anonymous||reply 358||11/11/2017|
The Daily Mail article posted a very unusual photo of Bryan Singer. In this one of kind picture, he doesn't look like a serial killer.
|by Anonymous||reply 359||11/11/2017|
UH, I’d have to disagree with you there, r359.
|by Anonymous||reply 360||11/11/2017|
R344: That story is both hilarious and disgusting at the same time. There was another account of Arnold letting one rip on a film set, I forget where exactly. He sounds like a real narcissistic asshole, forcing people to smell his shit, literally.
|by Anonymous||reply 361||11/11/2017|
In that picture he really has facelifted Ken doll look.
|by Anonymous||reply 362||11/11/2017|
Bryan Singer, IMDB profile.
CURRENT PROJECTS- PRODUCER:
Broadway 4D (executive producer) (completed) (project starring Hugh Jackman)
2018 Bohemian Rhapsody (producer) (post-production) (Freddie Mercury story)
2018 X-Men: Dark Phoenix (producer) (post-production) (Star Jessica Chastain didn't know Singer was involved.)
2017 World War III (TV Series) (executive producer) (announced)
Alpha Flight (rumored) (announced)
In the Middle of the Middle East (Documentary) (executive producer) (announced)
Men with No Fear (producer) (announced)
2017-2018 Legion (TV Series) (executive producer - 17 episodes)
2017 The Gifted (TV Series) (executive producer - 1 episode)
CURRENT PROJECTS - DIRECTOR:
Broadway 4D (completed)
2018 Bohemian Rhapsody (post-production)
2017 World War III (TV Series) (announced)
2017 The Gifted (TV Series) (1 episode) - eXposed (2017)
|by Anonymous||reply 363||11/11/2017|
I think there's just too many stories that are coming out. He can't kill them all, and with the constant pressure in Hollywood now he must know it's only a matter of time.
|by Anonymous||reply 364||11/11/2017|
Why is Adam Lambert hanging out with that sleaze @ R359? He should stay far away from Singer 'cause he likes 'em young-ish too.
|by Anonymous||reply 365||11/11/2017|
Is that really Lambert at R359?
|by Anonymous||reply 366||11/11/2017|
The Daily Mail article identifies the other guy as Lambert.
|by Anonymous||reply 367||11/11/2017|
r359 He doesn't??
I'm oddly disappointed Lambert hangs with Singer.
|by Anonymous||reply 368||11/11/2017|
You're disappointed about Lambert?
How do you think all of us on the Aaron Rodgers thread felt about the picture Olivia Munn made Rogers take with Singer?
|by Anonymous||reply 369||11/11/2017|
Why do I get the feeling more and more that this thread is filled with homophobic fraus.
|by Anonymous||reply 370||11/11/2017|
R370 Because you're utterly unable to defend your weak arguments, and so therefore you have to reach for the "homophobic frau" card in order to make yourself feel better.
|by Anonymous||reply 371||11/11/2017|
R371, that from someone who writes gems like this:
[quote]I recall after Egan withdrew his lawsuit there was talk some goons were sent to threaten him - or even actually attacked him. Wonder if that's what happened here.
If you're talking about the recent lawsuit he was forced to withdraw the lawsuits because he had lied about the facts. Even his lawyer apologized to the men he had accused. And as we know in 2015 Egan was sentenced to 2 years in jail for stealing over $300k from the people in a con he had run for years.
Like I've said before Egan was probably partly telling the truth, after all we know the deal with Collins-Rector and DEN, but he's a grifter. You just can't believe in anything he says.
|by Anonymous||reply 372||11/11/2017|
Why would you ask us to explain your feelings, R370? Do you think we relate to you in any way? Pedo-pervs are alien to us.
|by Anonymous||reply 373||11/11/2017|
[quote]Why would you ask us to explain your feelings, [R370]?
[quote]Do you think we relate to you in any way? Pedo-pervs are alien to us.
I certainly don't have much in common with homophobic frau cunts. "Pedo-pervs". Oh geez. Grow up.
|by Anonymous||reply 374||11/11/2017|
So why offer Egan a $100,000 settlement?
Sounds like Singer's paid off lots of these settlements and when Egan refused the standard amount, Singer dug up some criminal activity on him.
(Incidentally, it's not shocking that Singer could find something. When police and prosecutors try to use adult victims of child abuse as witnesses, they're often problematic: Many are so fucked up by the abuse, they've made bad choices and have a record.)
|by Anonymous||reply 375||11/11/2017|
R375, I remember reading it was easier and cheaper to offer the settlement than to have a highly visible court case in headlines for weeks and months around the time X-Men: Days of Future Past was being released. If I remember correctly "digging up Egan's criminal activity" was mostly about standard fact checking. He claimed he had been abused on the dates the defendants were able to prove to have been in a different country altogether.
No idea how his multi-year con ended up being revealed. It's possible P.I.s hired by Fox/Singer found about it and alerted the police. Or the police took a interest in him when he went public with Singer accusations in 2014.
"According to court docs, the shakedown was a fallback plan if a Ponzi scheme didn't pan out. Ancier says the friend asked Egan if he'd ever actually been molested ... and Egan said flat out, "God, no.""
|by Anonymous||reply 376||11/11/2017|
I never heard of Singer until I came here, where I ran across posts about his being a diddler. Seems like another site fixation.
|by Anonymous||reply 377||11/11/2017|
I don't buy it. If someone falsely accused me of child rape, I sure as fuck wouldn't offer them $100,000. On the contrary I'd sue them for slander...unless I had lots of ugly secrets that might come out in a trial.
|by Anonymous||reply 378||11/11/2017|
Bryan May and Roger Taylor hang out with Singer too. Singer is directing Freddie Mercury film as you already know.
|by Anonymous||reply 379||11/11/2017|
R378, there was some talk of Egan getting sued by at least Garth Ancier for slander, like mentioned in the TMZ story in R376, but I'm too tired to google if that ever happened.
|by Anonymous||reply 380||11/11/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 381||11/11/2017|
Aww R372, once again you dig around my post history in an attempt at an ad hominem, and again you fail. If you read the post you quoted I didn't mention anything about the reliability of Egan, just that it was reported he was threatened, and wondering if that's happened in the Justin Smith case. And given that Smith confirmed to a friend he'd received threatening DMs which caused him to shut down his Twitter account, it's clear it did.
Plus, R378, if it ever came out you paid the guy, you'd seem massively guilty.
And no, R380, he didn't. Instead he focussed his attentions on demanding reform - such as stricter statute of limitations on child abuse cases and saying defendants should be given anonymity, and that accusers should be forced to contact the accused before they're able to file suit. Sounds like a pedo's charter to me - narrower statue of limitations would mean many victims would be outside of them by the time they're mentally sound enough to take action. And anonymity and making accusers talk to accused first just allows pay-offs and threats.
|by Anonymous||reply 382||11/11/2017|
[quote]there was some talk of Egan getting sued by at least Garth Ancier for slander
Nice diversion. Ancier isn't the one who offered Egan $100,000. It was your idol Singer who tried the Michael Jackson-type payoff.
|by Anonymous||reply 383||11/11/2017|
[quote]Aww [R372], once again you dig around my post history in an attempt at an ad hominem, and again you fail.
Oh yes, you're the one who claimed Dustin Lance Black was acting like a predator when he started dating 19 year old Tom Daley. Sometimes you really have to take a look at what the other one has written before. I've been called a pedo and a "perv-pedo" for not simply just buying everything that is said about Singer even though I've repeatedly said I'm not into young guys. I'm obviously checking out the trolldar. This place is full of people with agendas, and these Singer threads usually get filled with hysteric posts.
[quote]Nice diversion. Ancier isn't the one who offered Egan $100,000. It was your idol Singer who tried the Michael Jackson-type payoff.
What diversion? Ancier was accused at the same time as Singer by Egan. Those kinds of settlements aren't uncommon at all.
"Many--perhaps half--of the civil disputes in America are resolved without anyone admitting to wrongdoing. No-fault settlements are attractive because they allow both sides to claim victory. The plaintiff wins money, the defendant can say he wasn't convicted, and both sides save a bundle in legal fees."
|by Anonymous||reply 384||11/11/2017|
It's funny that Egan "can't be believed" but somehow Ancier can. You really couldn't be more transparent in your sympathies.
[quote]It won't matter if 100 boys come forward, the pedo protectors and assault apologists will dismiss them.
The Singer asslicker will argue his innocence long after Singer is rotting in jail.
|by Anonymous||reply 385||11/11/2017|
I explained once but I'll repeat it again so people can see how disingenuous you're being.
I was discussing Singer offering $100,000 in hush money and the fact that he didn't sue for slander. You diverted the conversation to Ancier.
And, no, innocent people do not routinely make $100,000 payoffs to liars. People with something to hide try cover-ups.
|by Anonymous||reply 386||11/11/2017|
379 Oh right, makes sense he'd be around Lambert then. For some stupid reason I forgot that connection.
|by Anonymous||reply 387||11/11/2017|
Too tired to Google something, but not tired enough to go through post histories, or to Google for Slate articles - we can all see your bullshit, Singer-troll. You knew very well Ancier didn't sue, you were just hoping no-one would fact-check it and you could pretend he did.
And I note you, ONCE AGAIN, are trying an ad hominem attack rather than arguing the actual argument. Seriously, it does nothing more than show how weak your argument is that you keep trying to resort to it.
As for this place being full of people with agendas - yes, like you, who clearly has an agenda of defending Singer. I must admit, your argument - that we can listen to no argument until it's been proven in a court of law - is an odd one to take on a gossip website.
|by Anonymous||reply 388||11/11/2017|
R385, well Egan was found to be lying by the court and is now serving time in jail for stealing money. What the hell should I be thinking about him?
Like I've said before many times I don't think Egan was lying about everything but he clearly wasn't the right person to take Singer and others to court.
When we have people like R382 who think a 19 to 22 year old guy is too young to be dating an older man it's clear there's something else going on here than just people being worried about teen abuse. Some of the posters here are clearly women who seem to hate men.
[quote]The Singer asslicker will argue his innocence long after Singer is rotting in jail.
The Singer asslicker? *sigh* I'm more than happy to say bon voyage to him if he ever gets sentenced to jail. For some reason that hasn't happened yet. Is it all just a big conspiracy or hasn't there just not been enough credible proof of him drugging and raping people, or having sex with underaged guys? If he's guilty I most certainly hope he gets caught, although like I've said I don't give a shit if he's had consentual sex with guys over 16.
[quote]it does nothing more than show how weak your argument is that you keep trying to resort to it.
What is my weak argument? That I want to see solid proof of Singer drugging and raping people or having sex with guys under 16 before condemning him as a pedo rapist? Oh how terrible of me.
|by Anonymous||reply 389||11/11/2017|
[QUOTE]When we have people like [R382] who think a 19 to 22 year old guy is too young to be dating an older man it's clear there's something else going on here than just people being worried about teen abuse. Some of the posters here are clearly women who seem to hate men.
Well this is quite something - both an ad hominem and a claim of me being a frau as a double? I presume your 19-22 year old guy comment is about Tom Daley? Just to be accurate, he was 18 when he and DLB met. And I already explained - in this thread - why I have questions about that relationship - dead dad, same age as Dustin - sound familiar? As for being a frau - nope, I'm actually a gay guy.
[QUOTE]What is my weak argument? That I want to see solid proof of Singer drugging and raping people or having sex with guys under 16 before condemning him as a pedo rapist? Oh how terrible of me.
That's it, just pretend no-one mentioned the DEN stuff, or how Singer attended parties hosted by a convicted pedo and child trafficker, and how he funded that pedos company, or the accusations from others about Singer assaulting people of questionable age, and the threats those people then receive. Plus that whole "if you don't agree with me you're a homophobic woman" angle is weak as fuck too. Aren't you aware the pedo trolls already tried that shit in the Spacey threads?
[QUOTE] I'm more than happy to say bon voyage to him if he ever gets sentenced to jail.
Such high standards! So, OJ Simpson, Bill Cosby, Richard Nixon - all fine upstanding people, right? Wall Street bankers - they did nothing wrong! Because GOD KNOWS that the rich and powerful are always treated equal to everyone else in the fine US legal system.
|by Anonymous||reply 390||11/11/2017|
[quote]What the hell should I be thinking about [Egan]?
Why the hell "innocent" Singer offered "grifter" Egan $100,000 in hush money. Why the hell Singer didn't sue this liar for slander.
But you know the answer to that: too much to hide.
|by Anonymous||reply 391||11/11/2017|
[quote]It's funny that Egan "can't be believed" but somehow Ancier can.
That strikes me as funny, too, considering Ancier was just as involved as the others.
[quote]Singer, Goddard, Ancier, and Neuman were all investors in a company accused in a lawsuit of being a veritable “male brothel” and run by a registered sex offender
[quote]Were Singer, Ancier, Goddard and Neuman really blind to where their money was going and what kind of behavior it was funding? The attorney who represented the DEN employees, Daniel Cheren, doesn’t think so.“
[quote]Some of these investors received in addition to their stock, a piece of a male brothel for their money,” he previously told a reporter. [bold]“Anyone who had a dinner at that estate or went to a party there, had to know what was going on.”[/bold]
|by Anonymous||reply 392||11/11/2017|
From the Radar article at R392:
[quote]The document listing the men was filed in the spring of 2000 in preparation for a $50 million stock offering scheduled for later that year. The amount invested by Goddard and Ancier is unknown, but according to other records, Neuman invested $617,110 and Singer’s contribution was $30,000 of a planned $50,000 investment.
Doesn't sound like Singer wanted to invest too much although I assume he wasn't too wealthy at the time.
[quote]Less than a year later, a group of DEN employees including Egan, Alex Burton, and Mark Ryan all filed suit against Collins-Rector, DEN and Brock Pierce
They didn't sue Singer and others at the time. Later when Egan sued Singer and others alone it turned out he head lied about various details and his case was thrown out of court.
[quote]Were Singer, Ancier, Goddard and Neuman really blind to where their money was going and what kind of behavior it was funding? The attorney who represented the DEN employees, Daniel Cheren, doesn’t think so.
Cheren obviously was representing his clients Egan, Burton and Ryan, and was possibly trying to implicate Singer and other wealthier investors to get more money. Then again he was possibly telling the truth.
[quote]Other investors named in the SEC documents obtained by Radar include Wonder Years actor Fred Savage, his brother, Ben Savage, Yahoo’s Terry Semel, Arianna Huffington’s ex, former Senator Michael Huffington, super-agent Gary Gersh, Wall Street honcho Mitchell Blutt, A&M Records head Gilbert Friesen (now deceased) — [bold]and dozens of other Hollywood bigwigs[/bold], none of whom have been in any way implicated in the sex ring investigation.
Like I mentioned earlier DEN had tons of investors.
|by Anonymous||reply 393||11/12/2017|
True, not all the DEN investors spent time hanging out with naked boys at the pool parties like Singer.
|by Anonymous||reply 394||11/12/2017|
R394, so why wasn't he sued alongside Collins-Rector? He wasn't that big in Hollywood at the time, and probably wasn't as "protected by Geffen", like some of you are claiming he is now.
|by Anonymous||reply 395||11/12/2017|
R393 you neglect to mention that David Geffen invested in DEN. And that of its many investors, only a few attended parties at the DEN estate - named the 'M& C' estate for 'Marc' (Collins-Rector) and 'Chad' (Shackley, his boyfriend who C-R began to 'date' when he was 15 years old). Incidentally the place had been the home of the gangster / Death Records' boss Marion 'Suge' Knight.
No women or straight adult male investors were invited. Singer and Geffen did attend those parties. There were naked teenage boys in the patio and pool area. Including 14, 15 year olds. And those kids were given drugs and alcohol.
Nor do you mention that 'Alex' (Alexander) Burton, who sued Singer et al. in the action with Egan, was PAID by David Geffen to spy on Collins-Rector, Shackley and Pierce when the cops and FBI started showing interest in their business dealings. Burton, according to Pierce's sworn testimony in front of a judge in a court in Miami in 2003, said when Shackley found emails between Burton and Geffen Burton was confronted by C-R, Pierce and Shackley and shouted 'I'll be at Dave Geffen's' as he left. Burton was hired by Bryan Singer to play Pyro in The X Men.
|by Anonymous||reply 396||11/12/2017|
[quote] 'Alex' (Alexander) Burton, who sued Singer et al. in the action with Egan,
He did? I only find information that in 2000 he sued Collins-Rector and DEN, not Singer and others. To my understanding the later suit against Singer and others were by Egan solely.
[quote] Burton was hired by Bryan Singer to play Pyro in The X Men.
He appeared in the first X-Men very briefly. I don't remember if he even had any lines, or if he did there weren't many. An article called his role a 'brief cameo'.
BTW, all this "you neglect to mention" crap is funny since I'm definitely not an encyclopedia about what happened at DEN or at Singer's pool parties, nor am I pretending to be.
|by Anonymous||reply 397||11/12/2017|
You answer every post about Singer with incomplete or misleading statements defending him so I'd say you are indeed pretending to be an expert on the topic.
Unfortunately your encyclopedic knowledge only extends to what suits your agenda.
|by Anonymous||reply 398||11/12/2017|
[quote]To my understanding the later suit against Singer and others were by Egan solely.
No, that's untrue and you know it. But it's easier to focus on Egan who can be easily discredited.
Apparently Singer paid off five victims who were within the statute of limitations for criminal action - to the tune of $20 million. Egan, who could only pursue civil action, was offered $100,000, by comparison, which he understandably declined to accept.
[quote]Five more alleged victims of Singer’s had come forward to Herman, and at least some of them had accusations within the statute of limitations. Under the proposed settlement, those five accusers would split the lion’s share of the settlement, which one source close to the case says amounted to $20 million. Egan would get a mere $100,000.
A question for DL legal types: If the five victims who accepted settlements were subpoenaed and forced to testify by a judge, could Singer compel them to return the enormous settlements?
|by Anonymous||reply 399||11/12/2017|
Link for quote at R399.
|by Anonymous||reply 400||11/12/2017|
The Twitter post in OP's link has been taken down. What did it say?
|by Anonymous||reply 401||11/12/2017|
R401 The OP quoted the entire text. It has been removed elsewhere, too. I'm surprised it's still here but Singer's attorneys have had their hands full lately.
|by Anonymous||reply 402||11/12/2017|
It said that Singer's 'favorite twins' who are the Entin twins held a guy down by the shoulders in a bedroom so Singer could assault him. It also said the guy hit Gary Goddard over the head with a lamp to escape an attempt to sexually assault him. A guy called Christopher Chase found the posts on FB.
|by Anonymous||reply 403||11/12/2017|
R403 Here's the link.
|by Anonymous||reply 404||11/12/2017|
The boy who played Pyro in the first X-Men was promised a better role in the sequel if one was made. Of course, Singer lied to Burton so he could get a taste of some of that twinky tail.
|by Anonymous||reply 405||11/12/2017|
If you look at the SEC filings for DEN, Alex Burton was a signatory for Enron, along with Garth Ancier's personal chef, who came out in support of Garth Ancier.
|by Anonymous||reply 406||11/12/2017|
Nothing appears to happening.
|by Anonymous||reply 407||11/12/2017|
Burton put out to get the role in the first place r405. He told everyone who would listen how he meet Singer in a hot tub and Bryan told him he would put him in an X-men movie.
It remains Burton's only acting credit.
|by Anonymous||reply 408||11/12/2017|
R408: That's probably how a lot of these sceevy Directors or producers work. Straight or gay they dangle enticements like this till they get what they want. Singer gave Burton a bullshit role and when he was done with him that was it.
|by Anonymous||reply 409||11/12/2017|
|by Anonymous||reply 410||11/16/2017|
Story removed, R410
|by Anonymous||reply 411||11/16/2017|
Who is he linked to that it never comes out?
|by Anonymous||reply 412||11/16/2017|
The boom is being lowered on Singer way too slowly.
|by Anonymous||reply 413||11/16/2017|
r413 no. This is a classic tactic that was used in the UK ring (which has some North American overlap) in order to allow the higher ups to cover their tracks. Sometimes it works so well that nothing comes of charges (Singer, Richard) other times the investigating agency is also so corrupt they end up not pursuing charges.
|by Anonymous||reply 414||11/17/2017|
Here's a link to R410's story.
|by Anonymous||reply 415||11/17/2017|
One thing I didn't realize from R415 is that Gary Goddard is getting co-directing credit with Bryan Singer for the film "Broadway 4D" starring Hugh Jackman, Christina Aguilera, and Harvey Fierstein. It is to be released in 2018.
Actor Anthony Edwards just recently accused Goddard of molestation and rape of teenage males. Like with Spacey, Singer again is adjacent to the the alleged criminal conduct. You are known by the company you keep, and all that.
The people financing "Broadway 4D" and "Bohemian Rhapsody" have got to be nervous.
|by Anonymous||reply 416||11/17/2017|
No, R416, Broadway 4D shut down production two years ago and isn’t happening. All they’d filmed was “Don’t Cry For Me, Argentina” with Cristina Aguilera.
|by Anonymous||reply 417||11/17/2017|
^^ Thanks. I was going by what I read at IMDB. Other articles from other sources indicate that it is pretty much dead.
|by Anonymous||reply 418||11/17/2017|
I hope this man is revealed.
|by Anonymous||reply 419||11/17/2017|