I've been to that station so many times and it never occurred to me that it was in a relationship, let alone married.
Where are they registered?
by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 28, 2017 1:56 AM |
Is Carol a woman?
by Anonymous | reply 2 | May 28, 2017 2:01 AM |
Carol's stated age is 45 yet the boobs are just above the navel and the butt is obviously padded. Why?
by Anonymous | reply 3 | May 28, 2017 2:05 AM |
From the article "It is a worldwide debate whether the phenomenon is a sexuality, fetish or mental condition."
Um, no. There's no debate on this one.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | May 28, 2017 2:07 AM |
Carol is a member of the Q along with the Adult Baby Diaper Wearers, Furries and Fat Sexers.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 28, 2017 2:09 AM |
The Internet is responsible for a lot of this stuff:
Carol didn’t discover this until she was 40 after she searched online ‘I am in love with a building.’
by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 28, 2017 2:10 AM |
Hep her, Lawd. HEP HER REAL BAD.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | May 28, 2017 2:11 AM |
Carol identifies as an "objectum sexual".
Actually, it doesn't seem so bad. She's not infringing on anyone else's rights or identity.
She's not lecturing a group to which she doesn't belong.
She's not calling anyone else's sexual orientation a "consolation prize".
by Anonymous | reply 8 | May 28, 2017 2:14 AM |
R8 = Married to the Grauman's Chinese Theatre
by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 28, 2017 2:20 AM |
So she's not bothered that closeted married men are having sex in the toilet stalls located INSIDE her husband?
by Anonymous | reply 10 | May 28, 2017 2:22 AM |
This is a marriage that we should keep track of.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | May 28, 2017 2:34 AM |
R10, Carol doesn't have a husband:
"Carol said: ‘I am married to the Santa Fe train station – her name is Daidra."
by Anonymous | reply 12 | May 28, 2017 2:36 AM |
Let's hope this marriage doesn't go off the rails.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | May 28, 2017 2:37 AM |
I hope she doesn't get a terminal illness.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | May 28, 2017 2:44 AM |
Trainswomen are real women!
by Anonymous | reply 15 | May 28, 2017 3:17 AM |
She's off her trolley.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | May 28, 2017 3:26 AM |
What. The. Actual. Fuck. Seriously.
And this: "she told that she would never leave me." It's a fucking building. It can't move. (Or think, feel, talk, or commit, but those are just minor details.)
by Anonymous | reply 17 | May 28, 2017 3:33 AM |
That slut of a station never told me it was married!!!
by Anonymous | reply 18 | May 28, 2017 3:50 AM |
Only in America!
by Anonymous | reply 19 | May 28, 2017 3:56 AM |
She's in for a sad life... that train station has been on Buildr as long as I have.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | May 28, 2017 4:11 AM |
The berth of a love affair!
by Anonymous | reply 21 | May 28, 2017 7:47 AM |
Does Carol bring a lot of baggage to this relationship?
by Anonymous | reply 22 | May 28, 2017 8:05 AM |
That son-of-a-bitch, we were ENGAGED!
by Anonymous | reply 23 | May 28, 2017 8:19 AM |
She' s a trainlesbian?
by Anonymous | reply 24 | May 28, 2017 8:28 AM |
Most of the Objectum Sexuals are poly.
Here's a video you'll never forget:
by Anonymous | reply 25 | May 28, 2017 10:12 AM |
She is blatantly schizophrenic. She is unable to separate her own identity from that of others or her surrounding environment. This is some bullshit propaganda written by some fuck head intending to undermine people's intentions to do what they choose with their own identities within the boundaries of their own self.
It's obvious that no one will ever take this "marriage" seriously. It's not legally binding, there is no possibility for a contract to be drawn between a person and an unconsenting inanimate object. It's clear that anyone who "recognises" this "marriage" is humouring the lady. She is mentally ill, she is deranged. She is not seeking to redefine herself, she is seeking to redefine her environment. It is magical thinking.
It is fair for us to respect the self-determination of others. If you are unable to treat that person's decisions with respect, you should walk away, and defend the rights of others who you are able to respect who are having trouble defending their ability to define themselves. I understand your concern for children, but you should back the fuck off adults. You should stop telling others that they are wrong about the way they define themselves.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | May 28, 2017 10:33 AM |
She choo choo chose it
by Anonymous | reply 27 | May 28, 2017 10:38 AM |
As an insatiable bottom, trains make me horny too. All that hard steel going in tunnels... mmm.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | May 28, 2017 10:46 AM |
‘There is a private bit where two walls meet, I go there to touch her, which I do by leaning against her with my clothes on. When I’m touching her, I feel as though it actually holds me and kisses me."
(Umm ok. )
Objectum sexuality is not a mental illness like the media always makes out. It is our sexuality, just like being lesbian or bisexual – we are not crazy. People just don’t understand.
(See? She's jumping in on the LGB! Fuck that)
by Anonymous | reply 29 | May 28, 2017 10:46 AM |
Apparently half of the people with this "orientation" are autistic. Surprise.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | May 28, 2017 10:54 AM |
That fucking two-timing station!!! He said he was mine!!!
by Anonymous | reply 31 | May 28, 2017 12:17 PM |
[quote]Apparently half of the people with this "orientation" are autistic. Surprise.
I did NOT see that coming, R30?
by Anonymous | reply 32 | May 28, 2017 2:30 PM |
Just wait until her husband wants to run a train on her.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | May 28, 2017 2:37 PM |
If I jack-off in the restroom there, is that considered adultery?
by Anonymous | reply 34 | May 28, 2017 5:24 PM |
She's a trainy.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | May 28, 2017 7:45 PM |
This video shows the location of Daidra's vagine. In the interest of science, could one of our San Diegans go and hump it while Carol is watching, then report back?
by Anonymous | reply 36 | May 28, 2017 8:00 PM |
I would have an affair with it if it had a big cock for me to play with.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | May 28, 2017 8:11 PM |
Now that I saw the video, the NYP is really just abusing the fact she has a mental disorder for views .
by Anonymous | reply 38 | May 28, 2017 8:42 PM |
Well, who contacted the media to get this story out there, R38?
by Anonymous | reply 39 | May 28, 2017 9:01 PM |
It's just a matter of time before we will see the tracks of her tears.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | May 28, 2017 9:04 PM |
haha
by Anonymous | reply 41 | June 2, 2017 10:58 PM |
And [italic]of course[/italic] she's in a pink braless onesie with a fanny pack. Wouldn't have my nuts any other way.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | June 2, 2017 11:01 PM |
So dear, at what point did your life go off the rails?
by Anonymous | reply 44 | June 3, 2017 2:57 AM |
R10 = W&W!
by Anonymous | reply 45 | June 3, 2017 3:08 AM |
Meanwhile, right-wing, anti-gay asshole tries to marry his laptop.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | June 3, 2017 8:08 PM |
As long as you're happy!
by Anonymous | reply 47 | June 3, 2017 8:13 PM |
They've had TRIPLETS!
Acheson, Topeka, and Santa Faye
by Anonymous | reply 48 | June 4, 2017 7:55 AM |
These building-fanciers are always the homeliest things
by Anonymous | reply 49 | June 4, 2017 7:59 AM |
So she first encounters this building as a nine-year-old, sees that huge gaping portal entrance, which combined with the vibrations of the moving trains triggers a sexual awakening in her (soaked panties and all), and her brain centre for sexual enjoyment is forever linked to this one inanimate object.
I like that she's happy, it's just funny to me how an innocent visit to a train station can affect one's life so dramatically.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | June 4, 2017 2:27 PM |
This is rape, the train station cannot choose or say no when that perv start rolling around in her vagina crevice.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | June 4, 2017 2:58 PM |
Ever see "Strangers on a Train?"
by Anonymous | reply 52 | June 4, 2017 11:22 PM |
She's an objectum sexual but only for female objects? Which makes her a lesbian in the objectum sexual community?
Maybe we could get her to answer some of our most burning questions here, in this thread? Are there any particularly nasty posts we should be ashamed of? Apart from those calling her a homely nut, that is.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | June 4, 2017 11:31 PM |
So if the woman is a lesbian, shouldn't her bride be named Santa Diega?
by Anonymous | reply 54 | June 4, 2017 11:35 PM |
R54 She named the station Daidra, which is ridiculous on its own. Though I'm sure she's reading this and hitting her forehead that she hadn't thought of Santa Diega first.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | June 4, 2017 11:41 PM |
She looks EXACTLY how I expected her to look.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | June 4, 2017 11:54 PM |
Bump.
And by that I mean her baby bump, which should be showing by now, no? That kid's gonna get teased so hard at school, what with its long, train station-like features.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | October 1, 2017 12:33 PM |
Oh, the homophobes are gonna like this....That is what this really is all about. It's about the homophobes limiting acceptance of gay rights.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | October 1, 2017 12:52 PM |
There was just a play on this very topic at The Flea Theatre in NYC.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | October 1, 2017 1:01 PM |
So how is she supposed to get that on a plane?
by Anonymous | reply 60 | October 1, 2017 4:05 PM |
🚉
by Anonymous | reply 61 | May 3, 2021 10:46 PM |
Remember when people used to use the argument against gay marriage, "what's next? people marrying train stations!?".
Uncle Ira, you have been vindicated.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | May 3, 2021 10:54 PM |