Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Woman marries San Diego train station

I've been to that station so many times and it never occurred to me that it was in a relationship, let alone married.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 62May 3, 2021 10:54 PM

Where are they registered?

by Anonymousreply 1May 28, 2017 1:56 AM

Is Carol a woman?

by Anonymousreply 2May 28, 2017 2:01 AM

Carol's stated age is 45 yet the boobs are just above the navel and the butt is obviously padded. Why?

by Anonymousreply 3May 28, 2017 2:05 AM

From the article "It is a worldwide debate whether the phenomenon is a sexuality, fetish or mental condition."

Um, no. There's no debate on this one.

by Anonymousreply 4May 28, 2017 2:07 AM

Carol is a member of the Q along with the Adult Baby Diaper Wearers, Furries and Fat Sexers.

by Anonymousreply 5May 28, 2017 2:09 AM

The Internet is responsible for a lot of this stuff:

Carol didn’t discover this until she was 40 after she searched online ‘I am in love with a building.’

by Anonymousreply 6May 28, 2017 2:10 AM

Hep her, Lawd. HEP HER REAL BAD.

by Anonymousreply 7May 28, 2017 2:11 AM

Carol identifies as an "objectum sexual".

Actually, it doesn't seem so bad. She's not infringing on anyone else's rights or identity.

She's not lecturing a group to which she doesn't belong.

She's not calling anyone else's sexual orientation a "consolation prize".

by Anonymousreply 8May 28, 2017 2:14 AM

R8 = Married to the Grauman's Chinese Theatre

by Anonymousreply 9May 28, 2017 2:20 AM

So she's not bothered that closeted married men are having sex in the toilet stalls located INSIDE her husband?

by Anonymousreply 10May 28, 2017 2:22 AM

This is a marriage that we should keep track of.

by Anonymousreply 11May 28, 2017 2:34 AM

R10, Carol doesn't have a husband:

"Carol said: ‘I am married to the Santa Fe train station – her name is Daidra."

by Anonymousreply 12May 28, 2017 2:36 AM

Let's hope this marriage doesn't go off the rails.

by Anonymousreply 13May 28, 2017 2:37 AM

I hope she doesn't get a terminal illness.

by Anonymousreply 14May 28, 2017 2:44 AM

Trainswomen are real women!

by Anonymousreply 15May 28, 2017 3:17 AM

She's off her trolley.

by Anonymousreply 16May 28, 2017 3:26 AM

What. The. Actual. Fuck. Seriously.

And this: "she told that she would never leave me." It's a fucking building. It can't move. (Or think, feel, talk, or commit, but those are just minor details.)

by Anonymousreply 17May 28, 2017 3:33 AM

That slut of a station never told me it was married!!!

by Anonymousreply 18May 28, 2017 3:50 AM

Only in America!

by Anonymousreply 19May 28, 2017 3:56 AM

She's in for a sad life... that train station has been on Buildr as long as I have.

by Anonymousreply 20May 28, 2017 4:11 AM

The berth of a love affair!

by Anonymousreply 21May 28, 2017 7:47 AM

Does Carol bring a lot of baggage to this relationship?

by Anonymousreply 22May 28, 2017 8:05 AM

That son-of-a-bitch, we were ENGAGED!

by Anonymousreply 23May 28, 2017 8:19 AM

She' s a trainlesbian?

by Anonymousreply 24May 28, 2017 8:28 AM

Most of the Objectum Sexuals are poly.

Here's a video you'll never forget:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25May 28, 2017 10:12 AM

She is blatantly schizophrenic. She is unable to separate her own identity from that of others or her surrounding environment. This is some bullshit propaganda written by some fuck head intending to undermine people's intentions to do what they choose with their own identities within the boundaries of their own self.

It's obvious that no one will ever take this "marriage" seriously. It's not legally binding, there is no possibility for a contract to be drawn between a person and an unconsenting inanimate object. It's clear that anyone who "recognises" this "marriage" is humouring the lady. She is mentally ill, she is deranged. She is not seeking to redefine herself, she is seeking to redefine her environment. It is magical thinking.

It is fair for us to respect the self-determination of others. If you are unable to treat that person's decisions with respect, you should walk away, and defend the rights of others who you are able to respect who are having trouble defending their ability to define themselves. I understand your concern for children, but you should back the fuck off adults. You should stop telling others that they are wrong about the way they define themselves.

by Anonymousreply 26May 28, 2017 10:33 AM

She choo choo chose it

by Anonymousreply 27May 28, 2017 10:38 AM

As an insatiable bottom, trains make me horny too. All that hard steel going in tunnels... mmm.

by Anonymousreply 28May 28, 2017 10:46 AM

‘There is a private bit where two walls meet, I go there to touch her, which I do by leaning against her with my clothes on. When I’m touching her, I feel as though it actually holds me and kisses me."

(Umm ok. )

Objectum sexuality is not a mental illness like the media always makes out. It is our sexuality, just like being lesbian or bisexual – we are not crazy. People just don’t understand.

(See? She's jumping in on the LGB! Fuck that)

by Anonymousreply 29May 28, 2017 10:46 AM

Apparently half of the people with this "orientation" are autistic. Surprise.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30May 28, 2017 10:54 AM

That fucking two-timing station!!! He said he was mine!!!

by Anonymousreply 31May 28, 2017 12:17 PM

[quote]Apparently half of the people with this "orientation" are autistic. Surprise.

I did NOT see that coming, R30?

by Anonymousreply 32May 28, 2017 2:30 PM

Just wait until her husband wants to run a train on her.

by Anonymousreply 33May 28, 2017 2:37 PM

If I jack-off in the restroom there, is that considered adultery?

by Anonymousreply 34May 28, 2017 5:24 PM

She's a trainy.

by Anonymousreply 35May 28, 2017 7:45 PM

This video shows the location of Daidra's vagine. In the interest of science, could one of our San Diegans go and hump it while Carol is watching, then report back?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 36May 28, 2017 8:00 PM

I would have an affair with it if it had a big cock for me to play with.

by Anonymousreply 37May 28, 2017 8:11 PM

Now that I saw the video, the NYP is really just abusing the fact she has a mental disorder for views .

by Anonymousreply 38May 28, 2017 8:42 PM

Well, who contacted the media to get this story out there, R38?

by Anonymousreply 39May 28, 2017 9:01 PM

It's just a matter of time before we will see the tracks of her tears.

by Anonymousreply 40May 28, 2017 9:04 PM

haha

by Anonymousreply 41June 2, 2017 10:58 PM

And [italic]of course[/italic] she's in a pink braless onesie with a fanny pack. Wouldn't have my nuts any other way.

by Anonymousreply 42June 2, 2017 11:01 PM

What's the problem here?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43June 3, 2017 12:42 AM

So dear, at what point did your life go off the rails?

by Anonymousreply 44June 3, 2017 2:57 AM

R10 = W&W!

by Anonymousreply 45June 3, 2017 3:08 AM

Meanwhile, right-wing, anti-gay asshole tries to marry his laptop.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 46June 3, 2017 8:08 PM

As long as you're happy!

by Anonymousreply 47June 3, 2017 8:13 PM

They've had TRIPLETS!

Acheson, Topeka, and Santa Faye

by Anonymousreply 48June 4, 2017 7:55 AM

These building-fanciers are always the homeliest things

by Anonymousreply 49June 4, 2017 7:59 AM

So she first encounters this building as a nine-year-old, sees that huge gaping portal entrance, which combined with the vibrations of the moving trains triggers a sexual awakening in her (soaked panties and all), and her brain centre for sexual enjoyment is forever linked to this one inanimate object.

I like that she's happy, it's just funny to me how an innocent visit to a train station can affect one's life so dramatically.

by Anonymousreply 50June 4, 2017 2:27 PM

This is rape, the train station cannot choose or say no when that perv start rolling around in her vagina crevice.

by Anonymousreply 51June 4, 2017 2:58 PM

Ever see "Strangers on a Train?"

by Anonymousreply 52June 4, 2017 11:22 PM

She's an objectum sexual but only for female objects? Which makes her a lesbian in the objectum sexual community?

Maybe we could get her to answer some of our most burning questions here, in this thread? Are there any particularly nasty posts we should be ashamed of? Apart from those calling her a homely nut, that is.

by Anonymousreply 53June 4, 2017 11:31 PM

So if the woman is a lesbian, shouldn't her bride be named Santa Diega?

by Anonymousreply 54June 4, 2017 11:35 PM

R54 She named the station Daidra, which is ridiculous on its own. Though I'm sure she's reading this and hitting her forehead that she hadn't thought of Santa Diega first.

by Anonymousreply 55June 4, 2017 11:41 PM

She looks EXACTLY how I expected her to look.

by Anonymousreply 56June 4, 2017 11:54 PM

Bump.

And by that I mean her baby bump, which should be showing by now, no? That kid's gonna get teased so hard at school, what with its long, train station-like features.

by Anonymousreply 57October 1, 2017 12:33 PM

Oh, the homophobes are gonna like this....That is what this really is all about. It's about the homophobes limiting acceptance of gay rights.

by Anonymousreply 58October 1, 2017 12:52 PM

There was just a play on this very topic at The Flea Theatre in NYC.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 59October 1, 2017 1:01 PM

So how is she supposed to get that on a plane?

by Anonymousreply 60October 1, 2017 4:05 PM

🚉

by Anonymousreply 61May 3, 2021 10:46 PM

Remember when people used to use the argument against gay marriage, "what's next? people marrying train stations!?".

Uncle Ira, you have been vindicated.

by Anonymousreply 62May 3, 2021 10:54 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!