Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

South African Students Say Science Is Racist and Should Be Abolished

Students at the University of Cape Town in South Africa brought some interesting concerns before the science faculty this week: namely, they think science as it is currently understood must be abolished.

"The whole thing should scratched off, especially in Africa," said one of the students.

The students are apparently known as "fallists." Their hashtag is #ScienceMustFall. You can watch them make their case during a meeting here.

Essentially, these students believe that modern scientific understanding is too Eurocentric. One explained:

"I have a question for all the science people. There is a place in KZN called Umhlab'uyalingana. They believe that through the magic' you call it black magic' they call it witchcraft' you are able to send lightening to strike someone. Can you explain that scientifically because it's something that happens?"

Many people laughed at this remark because, well, witchcraft is not something that happens. But according to the student, witchcraft is like Isaac Newton's theory of gravity—it's just one way of explaining the world, among many.

"Decolonising the science would mean doing away with it entirely and starting all over again to deal with how we respond to the environment and how we understand it," the student continued.

----------------

There is a longer version of the video out there including an amusing additional scene. After the young lady finishes condemning western colonial science, she unironically checks her phone for texts.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 96October 18, 2016 10:08 PM

bye bye

by Anonymousreply 1October 17, 2016 2:20 AM

Extensive IQ testing has shown the South African universities to be Sisyphean endeavours.

by Anonymousreply 2October 17, 2016 2:23 AM

There are many different ways to explain things. Doesn't mean that all those explanations are correct.

by Anonymousreply 3October 17, 2016 2:24 AM

What does that mean, R2?

by Anonymousreply 4October 17, 2016 2:25 AM

The average black student in a South African university has an IQ of less than 80. So what kind of higher learning is going on working with that?

by Anonymousreply 5October 17, 2016 2:30 AM

I might have gone along with them if they were talking about literature or music and making the case that Shakespeare or Beethoven are only geniuses if one accepts a Eurocentric paradigm on what makes literature or music great. I might have gone along with them if they were debating the merits of Giotto and renaissance painters relative to indigenous art. If the argument were that the criteria which establishes these works as great are derived from a European bias against which African art cannot be succeed - sure.

But, science? I'll believe in witchcraft when it operates 100% of the time ,like gravity does, and can be used to predict and explain other natural phenomena. Can witchcraft bring Halley's Comet into view from the earth every 75 years like gravity does?

But hey, it's their right to believe whatever they want. If they can weaponize witchcraft, they'll clearly become a global dominant military power able to establish a new orthodoxy which is less Eurocentric.

Good luck to them.

by Anonymousreply 6October 17, 2016 2:30 AM

What, R5 ? How can that be!

by Anonymousreply 7October 17, 2016 2:31 AM

[quote]What does that mean, [R2]?

I think that S. African schools may not be the only ones with that burden, r2.

Where were you educated, r4?

by Anonymousreply 8October 17, 2016 2:31 AM

Why do these young things have their ideas taken seriously? Sometimes there needs to be an adult in the room telling them - no, just no - you're wrong.

by Anonymousreply 9October 17, 2016 2:33 AM

I understood the allusion, R8 - I wanted to know the data behind it.

by Anonymousreply 10October 17, 2016 2:33 AM

If R6 is a university professor, I would register for his course(s)!

by Anonymousreply 11October 17, 2016 2:37 AM

[quote] Extensive IQ testing has shown the South African universities to be Sisyphean endeavours.

Extensive IQ testing has shown R2 to be an ignorant and irrational moron.

by Anonymousreply 12October 17, 2016 2:39 AM

R5 has an IQ of less than 80. So what kind of posting is going on working with that?

by Anonymousreply 13October 17, 2016 2:41 AM

Individuals between 80-90 in IQ, if they are very high functioning, can certainly go to "college" and succeed in some professions, but why probably aren't capable of higher and critical thinking such as systems theory, the history of science, philosophy, etc. 100-110 is the sweat spot for many of the so-called "professions" and the ones demanding higher thinking really 110-130.

by Anonymousreply 14October 17, 2016 2:42 AM

r13 in your fantasy, dear.

by Anonymousreply 15October 17, 2016 2:43 AM

R2 supports Trump. And with his spelling, he voted in favour of Brexit as well.

by Anonymousreply 16October 17, 2016 2:44 AM

The dimwit in the video has no business deconstructing science as a cultural construction. She should be told so and encouraged to study something practicable that fits her intellectual capacity.

by Anonymousreply 17October 17, 2016 2:45 AM

Or, R17, she could replace Billy Bush at NBC.

by Anonymousreply 18October 17, 2016 2:47 AM

I see that the neo-Nazi wannabees and Klan cunts have stopped fucking their daughters long enough to stop by the Datalounge this evening.

Welcome, incestuous pig-fucking scumbags!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19October 17, 2016 2:49 AM

I am a democrat, and not a neo-nazi racist klan cunt, but a university professor. I know that in many countries, there are too many people in universities that have no business being there but here we are.

There aren't enough well-paying jobs for average folks and people and countries are using universities as a mob control method, selling false dreams. The dimwit in the video isn't going to be a writer or thinker. She needs training for a living wage job is what she needs.

by Anonymousreply 20October 17, 2016 2:56 AM

r29, what is your position on Aerodynamics or the Oxygen theory of combustion?

by Anonymousreply 21October 17, 2016 3:10 AM

R20 is a Democrat and a university professor in the same way that David Duke is a Democrat and a communications specialist.

by Anonymousreply 22October 17, 2016 3:16 AM

[quote][R29], what is your position on Aerodynamics or the Oxygen theory of combustion?

r21 - Do you subscribe to the witchcraft theory since you're demonstrating precognitive abilities which would make Philip K. Dick and most mediums and witches envious?

by Anonymousreply 23October 17, 2016 3:21 AM

[quote]After the young lady finishes condemning western colonial science, she unironically checks her phone for texts.

Her phone might be powered by witchcraft.

by Anonymousreply 24October 17, 2016 3:23 AM

College is for people to advance their ignorance and get corrected

by Anonymousreply 25October 17, 2016 3:30 AM

Hey, I know what that crazy chick does to me is VERY scientific.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26October 17, 2016 3:33 AM

R5 = big fan of "phantom"

by Anonymousreply 27October 17, 2016 3:35 AM

You all do realize that there are people in the Bible Belt who also shun science because it fails to explain the miracles of God.

by Anonymousreply 28October 17, 2016 3:40 AM

Yes of course, R28, we've seen them so often in recent weeks as Baskets of Deplorables.

by Anonymousreply 29October 17, 2016 3:42 AM

because God doesn't exist, R28.

by Anonymousreply 30October 17, 2016 3:43 AM

Ummm, about sending lightning bolts to hit your enemies, who can I contact for the particulars?

by Anonymousreply 31October 17, 2016 3:44 AM

Indeed, R31, that information should be in a DL faq.

by Anonymousreply 32October 17, 2016 3:48 AM

What have the Romans ever done for us?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33October 17, 2016 4:33 AM

R30 Of course God exists. That won't stop you from trying to convince yourself otherwise I'm sure. You'd rather believe you were created by nothing. Nothing just exploded into everything. Removing God allows you to remove the idea that there is some objective absolute standard of morality to which you are held. You can then live your life however you so choose and tell yourself that you'll never be punished for what you do You see, atheism isn't a case of "I don't believe in God" atheism is a case of "I don't WANT to believe in God. The bible says you are well aware of the fact that God exists but because you hate him so much you actively work to surpress any knowledge of him so that you can go off and do as you please. Repent or perish.

by Anonymousreply 34October 17, 2016 6:18 AM

It would have been interesting to see the response if these people were asked "Since it was originally set out by the ancient Greeks ans later broadened by 17th century Europeans, do you believe in the scientific method?" Basically observe, hypothesize and recreate the observation. Also, as others have mentioned above, are they willing to do away with EVERYTHING which has a basis in non-African discovery? Even the modern system of counting?

by Anonymousreply 35October 17, 2016 6:19 AM

R34, I don't hate which doesn't exist. Bringing up the bible to argue that God exists is an exercise in futility.

by Anonymousreply 36October 17, 2016 6:54 AM

r34: please explain to us the following:

A) where in my post I stated the words "atheist" or "hate" (or any of their forms). B) how you know what "standard of morality" I live by (especially if i haven't read your book), and how it may or may not be different from yours. C) how you, whoever you are, reconcile your personal OFFensive (and ofFENSive, for the record) pre-judgment of me vs what a non-Latino male named Jesus reportedly said about loving thy neighbor and not casting stones. D) how you know that an entity named "God" exists, scientifically. E) and for demographic purposes, what US state you live in and what denomination you are a member of? F) and if you are a paying DL member?

by Anonymousreply 37October 17, 2016 6:55 AM

Let me get this straight. If we point out that the girl in the video is a bit of a moron, we must be Klansmen?

by Anonymousreply 38October 17, 2016 7:33 AM

Aw, look at R34 trying to earn her heavenly extra credit by trying to save a horrible heathen. Will you buy a ruby for your crown when you get to heaven? A precious ruby to commemorate the shedding of Jesus' blood which saved all believers?

What a treasure you are. Thank you for your valued contribution to our community!

by Anonymousreply 39October 17, 2016 7:50 AM

Bump for original thread.

by Anonymousreply 40October 17, 2016 10:44 PM

The white man and the green man appropriating South African tribal lightning fingers.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 41October 18, 2016 2:38 AM

So I assume that the next time these fools need penicillin or a procedure that requires anasthesia, they will opt for the witch doctor method instead?

by Anonymousreply 42October 18, 2016 2:43 AM

They'd better, R42.

by Anonymousreply 43October 18, 2016 3:24 AM

I love you, R41.

by Anonymousreply 44October 18, 2016 4:14 AM

Again, no different than white Southerners who are supposed to be properly educated. These are college students. In America we have elected officials who believe variations of this.

by Anonymousreply 45October 18, 2016 4:22 AM

R45 Link please to American college students who wish to abolish science courses.

R38 Apparently that's the idea.

by Anonymousreply 46October 18, 2016 5:09 AM

[quote]If they can weaponize witchcraft, they'll clearly become a global dominant military power able to establish a new orthodoxy which is less Eurocentric.

That was basically the plot of [italic]Bedknobs and Broomsticks[/italic].

by Anonymousreply 47October 18, 2016 5:10 AM

R46, you don't see the parallels here? Many Southern Christians don't even believe in what is taught in our textbooks. They go to church and talk against science. These are all ignorant, backwards people. They exist all over the globe. This to me is not shocking or interesting.

by Anonymousreply 48October 18, 2016 5:59 AM

No, I don't see the parallels. Americans who are as stupid as you describe rarely finish high school. They aren't in college.

And why single out Southern Christians? Your agenda is showing.

by Anonymousreply 49October 18, 2016 1:14 PM

Well Liberty U. does have a creationism department...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50October 18, 2016 1:26 PM

When R34 kills an ant, first he reviews their life stories to see which ones were good ants and which ones were bad ants. Then he prepares a special terrarium filled with potato salad for the good ants to eat in the afterlife, and the bad ants he puts in a terrarium where the outsides are coated with RAID.

Has there ever been anything as stupid as religion? When you say you believe in religion, what you are really saying is that you believe other people can magically control nature by talking to magical beings that only they know and understand. Instead of trying to learn about your world and control it through your own efforts, you want someone else to control it by telling you what to do to please these magical beings. That's not "morality," that's the herd mentality.

by Anonymousreply 51October 18, 2016 2:41 PM

Indeed, it is immorality, and that's why religion's claims to be a moral arbiter are doomed to fail. You can't erect a moral system on a foundation of fraud and expect it to work. If morality is absolute it is not "human nature" and yet religion is nothing if not the failure of humans to use their brains.

by Anonymousreply 52October 18, 2016 3:03 PM

R12 you must be South African, average IQ of 77, barely above room temperature.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 53October 18, 2016 3:08 PM

Joke or not, this is yet another example of the hopelessness that comprises the entire continent of Africa, from stem to stern, from the Mediterranean to the Cape of Good Hope.

Keep hoping, Africa.

by Anonymousreply 54October 18, 2016 3:09 PM

r10, Metaphors don't come with "data," you nitwit.

by Anonymousreply 55October 18, 2016 3:12 PM

Other than creationism, Southern Christians still believe in science. You know, gravity, computers, medicine. Not witchcraft in the sense that it is used to harness energy or explain the seasons. I understand where you think it is the same, but only if you are talking about religion, not science overall.

by Anonymousreply 56October 18, 2016 3:13 PM

Yes, r2, but they haven't taken over our universities.

by Anonymousreply 57October 18, 2016 3:15 PM

Well, I have finally realized the comment I should have made first, the only pertinent one:

Cry, the Beloved Country.

by Anonymousreply 58October 18, 2016 3:16 PM

I meant r28.

by Anonymousreply 59October 18, 2016 3:17 PM

And yet we have a southern witch right here on Datalounge R56. Those people in South Africa believe in gravity, computers, and medicine also. But neither they nor the Southern Christians could have invented any of it. Yes, lots of inventors and scientists have believed weird shit (Sir Isaac Newton dabbled in alchemy they say), but you have to be willing to be persuaded by evidence, which is a habit of mind Southern Christians do not have.

by Anonymousreply 60October 18, 2016 3:19 PM

R50 that just proves R49's point. Idiots don't belong in real universities.

But I don't see what the OP's link has to do with "Southern Christians" or Liberty "U." It's amazing who is considered a fair target on DL and who belongs to a protected class.

Cretins (in college no less) in South Africa reject all science but it's wrong to discuss it. Change the topic to creationists.

Gay men are stoned or thrown from buildings in the Middle East but that's verboten to discuss. Change the topic to Xtians.

by Anonymousreply 61October 18, 2016 3:22 PM

Southern Christians aren't the real enemy of science in America, social "scientists" are. The idiots in the gender studies, queer studies etc departments are. I have linked to a twitter account that publishes real abstracts from real peer reviewed articles. This particular abstract states that the scientific method is androcentric and must be replaced. A previous version of this account was deleted because of pressure from social "scientists" (see their pinned tweet). These people are absolute idiots and yet they have careers in academia.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 62October 18, 2016 3:54 PM

I love you R47!

by Anonymousreply 63October 18, 2016 4:18 PM

Exactly, r61! Everything is "racist" EXCEPT to criticize Whites and/or Christianity!

by Anonymousreply 64October 18, 2016 4:26 PM

Some religions are stupider than others by far.

by Anonymousreply 65October 18, 2016 4:37 PM

[quote] Southern Christians aren't the real enemy of science in America, social "scientists" are. The idiots in the gender studies, queer studies etc departments are. I have linked to a twitter account that publishes real abstracts from real peer reviewed articles. This particular abstract states that the scientific method is androcentric and must be replaced. A previous version of this account was deleted because of pressure from social "scientists" (see their pinned tweet). These people are absolute idiots and yet they have careers in academia.

Calling anything related to the study of sex "jenn-durr" and calling gay studies "q***r" is no less offensive than calling African-American history "tales of dem darkies."

by Anonymousreply 66October 18, 2016 4:38 PM

Yes: it should be noted that on the far right side of the ledger you have people denying the science of evolution and climate change while on the far left you have people denying the science of biology and genetics. And people don't see the irony.

by Anonymousreply 67October 18, 2016 4:53 PM

It's pure ideology, r66, nothing to do with science

by Anonymousreply 68October 18, 2016 4:55 PM

Are they going to bring in Voo Doo 101 to replace Science101?

by Anonymousreply 69October 18, 2016 5:08 PM

Does this mean we can count watching [italic]The Wizard of Oz[/italic] as homework?

by Anonymousreply 70October 18, 2016 5:12 PM

All 8 seasons of Bewitched can be studied for a Master of Science degree.

by Anonymousreply 71October 18, 2016 5:24 PM

I went to high school in the 70's. They offered a class called "The Bible as Literature". Apparently it was a class to discuss and study it purely on its literary merit.

by Anonymousreply 72October 18, 2016 5:36 PM

Southern Christians have always been violent bigots, so to say they are "not the problem" is to deny the importance of history.

by Anonymousreply 73October 18, 2016 6:02 PM

What sorcery is this?

by Anonymousreply 74October 18, 2016 6:30 PM

R73 under discussion is the window licking crazy South African woman who said science is Eurocentric and magic should be studied. Please enlighten us as to why you think Southern Christians are to blame?

by Anonymousreply 75October 18, 2016 6:41 PM

R73 we're discussing current events, not history.

But if you want to discuss violent bigots throughout history, I suspect you'll still be unhappy with which religion is the most bloodthirsty.

by Anonymousreply 76October 18, 2016 6:41 PM

It's not just "history" if there are decals of confederate stick figures kicking rainbow stickers in the name of a candidate for a party that was founded on the opposition to slavery.

by Anonymousreply 77October 18, 2016 6:49 PM

[quote]Please enlighten us as to why you think Southern Christians are to blame?

Who spread Christianity to Africa?

by Anonymousreply 78October 18, 2016 6:49 PM

What's your point r78? Christians spread Christianity, I'd bet anything they weren't Southern they'd have been European back then.

What makes you think that has anything to do with a whack doodle whining that science is white therefor magic should be taught instead? Please explain. I really am at a loss to understand what the fuck you're trying to say. Black South African is a nutcase so that's the fault of churchy people in Alabama?

by Anonymousreply 79October 18, 2016 6:54 PM

Did magic, voodoo or witchcraft prevent AIDS from ravaging Africa?

by Anonymousreply 80October 18, 2016 6:57 PM

[quote]You all do realize that there are people in the Bible Belt who also shun science because it fails to explain the miracles of God.

You I do realize that.

And we laugh at the them and call them what they are: STUPID.

by Anonymousreply 81October 18, 2016 6:58 PM

* "Yes I do realize that."

by Anonymousreply 82October 18, 2016 6:59 PM

The problem with most social sciences is that they don't account enough for environment although I've noticed a few researchers are starting to do that more. It's obviously impossible to fully account for it because humans can't grow up in a controlled lab experiment. Humans, no matter what group they belong to, are never all the same either. People take data and act like it applies to everyone in a group and they know exactly why. You can still find what appear to be trends; the danger is filling in the blanks of the way a person acts with those stereotypes rather than getting to know them individually. People do that all the time anyway. Science always ends up in the wrong hands. I see no way of stopping that.

Of course, I'm sure some people think different ethnic groups act differently because of genetics and not culture. A handful of races is way too broad, but what if there are slight differences between smaller groupings of people? The most similarities will be within families, not races, ethnic groups, genders, sexual orientations, etc, so for some more homogeneous regions you could maybe see some similarities between a lot of people almost as if they're a big family. I still think it's a dangerous road to go down. People would take a few studies from a few researchers and act like it's proven that every single person from Tajikistan acts a certain way. Even the people who are really into science are too stupid (or just lazy and/or narrow-minded) for it sometimes.

A good thing to remember is that the average person of average intelligence would believe whatever the culture they grow up in tells them to believe. Some of them just get lucky and grow up in smarter cultures.

by Anonymousreply 83October 18, 2016 7:01 PM

R83Some of them just get lucky and grow up in smarter cultures.

So what you are telling us is that some cultures ARE smarter than others.

by Anonymousreply 84October 18, 2016 7:07 PM

R79 The person freaking out over this thread has no point. It's all diversion. R61 summed it up pretty well: You can't laugh at the crazy bitch from South Africa because she's in a protected class. So let's change the topic to stupid, white Americans.

by Anonymousreply 85October 18, 2016 7:11 PM

Well, how did she get that way? She wasn't born with it. Someone had to teach it to her.

by Anonymousreply 86October 18, 2016 7:17 PM

Whoever discovered fire enabled cross-burnings, therefore fire is racist.

by Anonymousreply 87October 18, 2016 7:23 PM

R86, maybe she's a big Insane Clown Posse fan?

by Anonymousreply 88October 18, 2016 7:24 PM

Southern Christians, most of them, still deny global warming, so yes, they are enemies of science. This South African idiot think the indigenous people had a special wisdom for things like witchcraft that the colonialists lacked. This kind of thinking is dumb, and it has usually been implanted by the colonialists themselves, who have Indians believing they have special "spiritual" gifts and Chinese thinking their "folk medicine" is better than the real thing, and South African blacks believing they have special insights, all so management, organization, science, and power could be kept to themselves. What she thinks is of course ignorant, especially of the fact that all the ANC leaders including Mandela were firm believers in European values and education and it is they, not witch doctors, who procured rights for the people. It is hardly surprising that people who find their culture newly empowered and who think that the present time allows for more assertiveness and power-seeking in her culture, would approach the question this way. When women first won the vote all sorts of nonsense was asserted, that it would be the end of war and so on, that women would transform the way society works for the better, none of which has proved true since virtually all female leaders before the 90s were bloodthirsty warriors and it turned out to be an empty promise in the halls of power.

by Anonymousreply 89October 18, 2016 7:38 PM

But it's the same kind of stupid thinking. Now that WE'RE in charge, things are going to be different. No, power corrupts absolutely and any idea that the world is divided into "good" and "bad" people is going to end up not changing anything but the identity of the oppressor and the specific techniques of oppression. Real progress only comes from recognizing the universal, which is why SCIENCE has been so successful.

by Anonymousreply 90October 18, 2016 8:00 PM

R84 I guess I do think there are smarter cultures, sure, although I think some of that can be subjective, but then saying everything is subjective is a slippery slope sometimes. There are certainly more moral cultures. I mean there are cultures where killing someone from another tribe is a sign of manliness, or eating enemies is a way to steal their power, or eating loved ones is a way to keep them close to you, or kidnapping and raping the bride is the norm, or dogs are stolen from their owners and tortured before they're eaten. I think all of that is abhorrent. To act as if it's all natural is to act as if empathy is learned and no one can naturally be a good person. I think that does show that a lot of people would do seriously fucked-up shit if they grew up seeing it. Maybe there are good and bad people on either side of them on the spectrum who would be good or bad regardless. Nonetheless, I think it's bullshit to just respect everything about another culture. What I'd say is wrong is tying it too much to something intrinsic to the individuals within the culture.

by Anonymousreply 91October 18, 2016 9:10 PM

The old "science is racist" excuse to get out of taking your biology exam.

Oldest trick in the book.

by Anonymousreply 92October 18, 2016 9:43 PM

[quote]not changing anything but the identity of the oppressor and the specific techniques of oppression

Instead of oppressing people who don't deserve it, why not turn around and do it to those who do: like the people who oppressed those who didn't deserve it just because they were different from their oppressors.

by Anonymousreply 93October 18, 2016 9:46 PM

I practice santeria and there isn't such a thing as witchcraft and violating the laws of physics with it. These people are fanatics.

by Anonymousreply 94October 18, 2016 9:54 PM

R93 why not just try to stop oppression altogether? Do the future generations deserve to experience what their ancestors did to others?

by Anonymousreply 95October 18, 2016 10:04 PM

Rereading what you wrote, I realized you might mean you'd limit the punishment to those who were the actual oppressors, not everyone in their group. I'm not sure though.

by Anonymousreply 96October 18, 2016 10:08 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!