Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Elijah Wood talks about pedophile ring in Hollywood

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 602May 24, 2016 9:20 PM

Preposterous! Absurd! Unthinkable!

by Anonymousreply 1May 22, 2016 2:41 PM

Run while you can Singer.

by Anonymousreply 2May 22, 2016 2:41 PM

It still amazes me how Woody managed to get away with everything.

by Anonymousreply 3May 22, 2016 2:45 PM

But ... but Sandusky pulled it off all on his own! All pedophiles act on their own!

by Anonymousreply 4May 22, 2016 2:45 PM

One ring to screw them all.

by Anonymousreply 5May 22, 2016 2:46 PM

Tell me something i don't know

by Anonymousreply 6May 22, 2016 2:47 PM

R5 W&W

Oh wait that don't exist no more

by Anonymousreply 7May 22, 2016 2:48 PM

Useless unless he name name

by Anonymousreply 8May 22, 2016 2:49 PM

R7 Yeah, I was wondering what happened to W&W. Is there some archive or old thread where I can find them?

by Anonymousreply 9May 22, 2016 2:49 PM

Why don't these pedophiles just become priests? Then the law can't touch 'em!

by Anonymousreply 10May 22, 2016 2:50 PM

Beside Elijah, are there any other child-turned-adult actors who turned healthy and didn't go off the rails?

by Anonymousreply 11May 22, 2016 2:50 PM

Jodie Foster did well for herself compared to other Disney girls, R11.

by Anonymousreply 12May 22, 2016 2:52 PM

Both the Fanning sisters seem to have turned out relatively normal

by Anonymousreply 13May 22, 2016 2:56 PM

Did Kurt Russel turn out well?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14May 22, 2016 2:58 PM

R11 Jodie, Leo, Saoirse, Fanning sisters. They all had parents on set with them till they reached adulthood.

by Anonymousreply 15May 22, 2016 2:58 PM

Re Elle Fanning... why no one talks about married Refn passionately kissing someone who has turned 18 years old on the set of his movie?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16May 22, 2016 3:01 PM

I love him for saying this.

by Anonymousreply 17May 22, 2016 3:01 PM

When will someone spill the beans about Harvey's girls?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 18May 22, 2016 3:06 PM

I watched the old movie "Savannah Smiles" recently. I was surprised to find out online that Brigitte Andersen died of a heroin overdose after suddenly dropping out of the business at the height of her success as a child star. I wondered if she had been abused by someone in Hollywood.

by Anonymousreply 19May 22, 2016 3:09 PM

Or Dan Schneider who works for Nickelodeon

by Anonymousreply 20May 22, 2016 3:15 PM

R7 and R9, check out the blue "WW" button located in the lower right of the posting screen.

by Anonymousreply 21May 22, 2016 3:16 PM

I'm trying to imagine the circumstances under which I had details of a pedophile ring and I went to the press and didn't name names instead of going to the police.

by Anonymousreply 22May 22, 2016 3:18 PM

I totally agree, R22, even if he knows the cops have known about it all along and turned a blind eye.

by Anonymousreply 23May 22, 2016 3:20 PM

R21 You mean the W&W icon next to Facebook, Twitter and the rest? They only send notification to the poster that you liked their post. I am talking about a place where I can find all recent and/or old W&Ws.

by Anonymousreply 24May 22, 2016 3:20 PM

I wonder if Elijah had some bad experiences or if he knows someone who was a victim. Why does he say things like this in public with no details?

by Anonymousreply 25May 22, 2016 3:21 PM

@R22 Elijah is not a crusader. He is just being interviewed and has given his opinion about something he and many of his contemporaries went through. He's under no obligation to report anyone in any case those who are or have been abused should be going to the police with their allegations, which they have done.

by Anonymousreply 26May 22, 2016 3:21 PM

Sorry, R24. That function is gone.

by Anonymousreply 27May 22, 2016 3:22 PM

Could ask the same question to Corey Feldman

by Anonymousreply 28May 22, 2016 3:22 PM

The Mouseketeers who reported the molestation were destroyed by powerful people at Disney. That's likely to have been a cautionary tale for anyone who considered reporting

by Anonymousreply 29May 22, 2016 3:24 PM

R25 bc it is risky and a delicate situation. However, by what I have gathered from the articles I have read he seems not to have suffered at the hands of these 'industry people' so why should he be reporting anyone? It's brave enough for him to have broached the subject.

by Anonymousreply 30May 22, 2016 3:25 PM

it'll never happen because it involves Hollywood's biggest names, like S.S.

by Anonymousreply 31May 22, 2016 3:35 PM

R14, Kurt Russell seems to have been a favorite of Walt Disney - apparently AMONG the last words he wrote were "Kirt Russell". Now the writer at the link goes on to diminish the note's importance, but still - one has to wonder why his staff even interviewed Kurt about it decades ago, as Kurt himself noted years later. The link does give some insight as to how Walt warmly treated his child actors - at least some of them.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 32May 22, 2016 3:37 PM

Even if every single pedophile in HW was exposed, i doubt it would end it their careers

by Anonymousreply 33May 22, 2016 3:39 PM

R31 Never heard about it (and yes, I know who you mean). Please do clarify.

by Anonymousreply 34May 22, 2016 3:42 PM

Dan Schneider is evil personified

by Anonymousreply 35May 22, 2016 3:43 PM

R18 I think everyone knows about Harvey's girls, but I think none of them were underage.

Harvey is a disgusting pig, but I think he has more of a casting couch for mediocre talented, young, pretty stars.

by Anonymousreply 36May 22, 2016 3:44 PM

R30 - You don't think someone who has details on a pedophile ring has a moral obligation to report it to the police?

by Anonymousreply 37May 22, 2016 3:45 PM

If they are exposed and shamed it would set a precedent and send a message that it's not okay. I'm sure things will change if that happens.

The other positive effect I can think of is that HW wouldn't attract these 'types'. If they want to finger kids they'll go elsewhere.

by Anonymousreply 38May 22, 2016 3:45 PM

"If they want to finger kids they'll go elsewhere."

Was that necessary?

by Anonymousreply 39May 22, 2016 3:48 PM

[quote] The Mouseketeers who reported the molestation were destroyed by powerful people at Disney. That's likely to have been a cautionary tale for anyone who considered reporting

It seems like more of the 1990s Mouseketeers headed down this path than any of the prior versions.

by Anonymousreply 40May 22, 2016 3:49 PM

Crispin Glover on S.S.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 41May 22, 2016 3:50 PM

Disney seems to be getting worse as time goes on. Though i find it funny that they don't seem to be as restrictive with the current crop of Disney Stars when it comes to their image. No purity ring bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 42May 22, 2016 3:51 PM

R37 They can do it if they have proof. I think hearsay does not count as evidence. And details are not proof. It's your word against theirs

by Anonymousreply 43May 22, 2016 3:51 PM

R42 the moral climate is worse but the films, series and such they churn out are getting worse quality too; never mind the amount of money they sink in the projects.

by Anonymousreply 44May 22, 2016 3:53 PM

[quote]It's your word against theirs

The word of a poor, random child victim is worthless against the power of a rich, well-connected adult perp in Hollywood.

by Anonymousreply 45May 22, 2016 3:55 PM

R43 - Do work in PR for Penn State?

by Anonymousreply 46May 22, 2016 3:56 PM

R45 - Tell that to the Roman Catholic Church.

by Anonymousreply 47May 22, 2016 3:57 PM

What would happen to the "poor" parents who are only too happy to pimp their children out to these sickos......

by Anonymousreply 48May 22, 2016 4:00 PM

Not a pedophile but remember when Jerry Seinfeld dated a 17 year old and no one cared?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 49May 22, 2016 4:01 PM

I'm inclined to believe him. Have any of you people actually seen [italic]North[/italic] and not merely read Roger Ebert's evisceration of it? For one thing, Bruce Willis is in it. For another thing, there's a scene where one of North's potential new parents unveils a moving billboard of him in a Speedo that keeps getting ripped off by a dog, a la the Coppertone ads.

And as for Bruce Willis, he worked with Michael Jackson on the "Smooth Criminal" music video.

by Anonymousreply 50May 22, 2016 4:04 PM

Oh Jerry

by Anonymousreply 51May 22, 2016 4:05 PM

R18 On Howard Stern, Harvey denied that things are like that now. Referring to producers fucking the talent. That was before he tried to assault that Italian girl and proposed a threesome with his friend,Olivia Wilde(who was one of his fuckbuddies). Harvey doesn't go after Jewish girls because they would kick that fucker in the nuts.

"Poor Georgina" she must be at the doctor's office every week getting another test for yet some bizarre STD Harvey contracted.

by Anonymousreply 52May 22, 2016 4:09 PM

R49 Howard Stern did and gave him shit for it. She was technically legal in certain places but not in New York State. Can anyone say statuary rape?

by Anonymousreply 53May 22, 2016 4:11 PM

R49 yeah... what's your point? I'm not defending some str8 white guy but I think you are deflecting. The issue here is children and adolescents; minors who work in the industry and against their will and knowledge they are sexually abused and taken advantage of.

People like Miley Cyrus, Macaulay Culkin, Edward Furlong, Justin Bieber, Harry Styles, etc... spring to mind.

by Anonymousreply 54May 22, 2016 4:11 PM

I'm guessing he's had people tell him they were abused but they aren't interested in going to the authorities. It's just hear say from a legal perspective. Unless he witnessed anything there isn't anything he can do really.

by Anonymousreply 55May 22, 2016 4:13 PM

R47 The Catholic Church was exposed. The pedophiles in Hollywood and the British government haven't. Three boys were killed in the UK Pedo ring. There were Protestants,Catholics and Jews involved in that scandal. Even a journalist,Jill Dando, was killed because of her knowledge about the ring.

by Anonymousreply 56May 22, 2016 4:14 PM

Lindsey Lohan

by Anonymousreply 57May 22, 2016 4:14 PM

Britney Spears

by Anonymousreply 58May 22, 2016 4:15 PM

I posted about this almost a year ago and got shouted down by the Datalounge banshees, with screeches for me to take my meds, Dumb Vida poo and tin hat rantings. Looks like the chickens are slowly coming home to roost.

Also, none of what you say about the stars you mentioned successfully transitioning from child star to adult is true. They have been programmed (damaged) to have multiple personas that can be summoned forth at will. Rebab is just a euphemism for the programming and ritual abuse that goes at these facilities and private estates behind closed doors. There's the sparkly pretty face that is presented to the media and there's the dark traumatized persona you never get to see.

by Anonymousreply 59May 22, 2016 4:16 PM

Amanda Bynes owns this thread.

by Anonymousreply 60May 22, 2016 4:17 PM

Lou Pearlman

by Anonymousreply 61May 22, 2016 4:18 PM

This is simply sour grapes on Elijah's part.

by Anonymousreply 62May 22, 2016 4:19 PM

You don't fool anyone, R62.

by Anonymousreply 63May 22, 2016 4:20 PM

He didn't say anything about a "pedophile ring"

Um, just because there are abusers doesn't mean they all know each other and are part of a ring.

by Anonymousreply 64May 22, 2016 4:20 PM

Savile was uniquely grotesque in that he 'came from nothing', cultivated The Establishment via charity work, and hid in not very plain sight all his life. And got away with it all.

I imagine the Hollywood heavy hitters Wood refers to are more like the UK Establishment figures who TPTB work very very hard to protect, even after death. Way too many live links there, compromised people still with us etc.

It's Light Entertainment paedos sans Connections who get thrown to the wolves, not that there's anything wrong with that. Embedded power and money are pretty much home free.

by Anonymousreply 65May 22, 2016 4:21 PM

[quote]Lord of the Rings star Elijah Wood claims that Hollywood has its own Jimmy Savile scandal

The Jimmy Savile scandal is about a pedophile ring, R64. Whether you like it or not and whether you're part of a ring or act individually.

by Anonymousreply 66May 22, 2016 4:26 PM

Then he's a coward for not naming names.

by Anonymousreply 67May 22, 2016 4:27 PM

Yeah, gotta love these guys like Feldman and now Elijah who go on and on about pedophiles and rapists but won't name them.....either they are lying or they are just as guilty of "sheltering abusers" as the people they are condemning

by Anonymousreply 68May 22, 2016 4:29 PM

[quote]I imagine the Hollywood heavy hitters Wood refers to are more like the UK Establishment figures who TPTB work very very hard to protect, even after death. Way too many live links there, compromised people still with us etc.

That's because if the survivors ever spoke up, the result would be like a domino effect. One more ruined career after another. Fan attrition like you saw with Bill Cosby, but on a greater scale. Congressional investigations. Lots of people going to jail or being faced with the possibility of jail time if convicted. And that's just for those whose crimes haven't yet reached the statute of limitations. And all of it would be all over the news. It would make the Michael Jackson trials look like traffic court hearings by comparison.

by Anonymousreply 69May 22, 2016 4:30 PM

[quote]Then he's a coward for not naming names.

He does not wish to die in a one-vehicle "accident."

by Anonymousreply 70May 22, 2016 4:31 PM

r70, but he's condemning others for not coming forward. Gee, maybe those people are also afraid of coming forward

by Anonymousreply 71May 22, 2016 4:32 PM

Pedos use the same tactics as the mafia to keep their victims quiet.

by Anonymousreply 72May 22, 2016 4:33 PM

[quote]either they are lying or they are just as guilty of "sheltering abusers" as the people they are condemning

While I wish they felt they were able to take their complaints to another level, I don't believe either of these things is true.

by Anonymousreply 73May 22, 2016 4:34 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74May 22, 2016 4:35 PM

Yes, r59, I'm sure the pedophile ring part is what people were calling you crazy for.

by Anonymousreply 75May 22, 2016 4:35 PM

It's because he's friends with one of the abusers

by Anonymousreply 76May 22, 2016 4:36 PM

R67 are you stupid?

by Anonymousreply 77May 22, 2016 4:36 PM

[quote] It's because he's friends with one of the abusers

Was he friends with one whose name rhymed with "Jichael Mackson"?

by Anonymousreply 78May 22, 2016 4:37 PM

Blinded by fandom, r77?

by Anonymousreply 79May 22, 2016 4:38 PM

R73 yeah....keep on living 'somewhere over the rainbow'

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80May 22, 2016 4:40 PM

Many of you don't understand law. If he were to name names, he is then wide open for being sued for defamation. The victims would absolutely have to come forward on their own and file either a criminal or a civil lawsuit. As it is right now, anyone who goes on a message board and says a name is wide open to being sued. His story to the press, although he didn't name anyone, could end up being a very good thing because it might give courage to a victim or victims to start coming forward with lawsuits or charges.

by Anonymousreply 81May 22, 2016 4:40 PM

Elijah is a pedophile enabler for not coming forward!

by Anonymousreply 82May 22, 2016 4:41 PM

"If he were to name names, he is then wide open for being sued for defamation."

It ain't libel if it's true.......

by Anonymousreply 83May 22, 2016 4:41 PM

[quote]AN OPEN SECRET Documentary on Movie Business Child Sex Abuse

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 84May 22, 2016 4:42 PM

Hailey and Juliette Mills and the Cartwright sisters did ok. Billy Mumy is eccentric, but not destructive. The Corcoran kids seemed to do all right. Jerry Mathers. Tony Dow and the kids on My Three Sons were ok as adults (some have since died).

by Anonymousreply 85May 22, 2016 4:45 PM

there's a very specific reason why this will never come out...notice what's identical to all rumoured predators (aside from the fact that they're male)

by Anonymousreply 86May 22, 2016 4:46 PM

R80, please explain what the arrest of a child pornographer who worked on Glee has to do with my post.

by Anonymousreply 87May 22, 2016 4:46 PM

R11 - Ron Howard

by Anonymousreply 88May 22, 2016 4:47 PM

"You see my problem is this I'm dreaming away Wishing that heroes, they truly exist I cry, watching the days Can't you see I'm a fool in so many ways But to lose all my senses That is just so typically me Oh baby, oh

Oops, I did it again I played with your heart, got lost in the game Oh baby, baby Oops, you think I'm in love That I'm sent from above I'm not that innocent"

by Anonymousreply 89May 22, 2016 4:48 PM

[quote] They have been programmed (damaged) to have multiple personas that can be summoned forth at will. Rebab is just a euphemism for the programming and ritual abuse that goes at these facilities and private estates behind closed doors.

And the rails have been breached .....

by Anonymousreply 90May 22, 2016 4:48 PM

from r41's link:

[quote]Are the inclinations of Steven Spielberg above suspicion by the media-fed culture? Was Steven Spielberg very friendly with Michael Jackson? Wasn’t Michael Jackson supposed to play Peter Pan in Steven Spielberg’s version of the story? Now that Michael Jackson is no onger held in favor by the mass media, does Spielberg associate with him? Do Michael Jackson and Steven Spielberg share similar opinions about the sexuality of young boys?

from a link (reposted below) found in the "When did you know Michael Jackson is a pedophile?" thread (at r308):

[quote][Michael Jackson] also kept a dartboard in the foyer of his bedroom with pictures of DreamWorks founders Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg — who he believed had stolen his idea for the studio and even its boy-on-the-moon logo.

[quote]"Any of the children he played with who hit the bull’s-eye would get extra ice cream or anything else they wanted,” said Maid No. 3, who worked from 1996 to 1999. “He hated those guys with a passion. He was surprisingly very anti-Semitic. He’d lead some of the kids in chants: ‘Kill the bastards,’ and ‘Kill the bloodsuckers.’ ”

[quote]The maid said Jacko watched in disgust as Spielberg got a Los Angeles Film Critics award in the 1990s.

[quote“It was crazy. He turned into his favorite ‘Twilight Zone’ character, and his eyes kind of bugged out, and he went into this crazy trance, pointing his finger at the television screen and saying, ‘You’re a bad man, a very bad man,’ ” she said, referring to the famed TV series’ character of Anthony Fremont, a boy who “wishes away” anyone who displeases him.

[quote]“At first, I thought he’d bust out laughing or something or that he was playing around, but it changed his entire mood. He was dead serious.”

[quote]Instead of banishing his foe to a cornfield, as Anthony did, Jacko would wish Spielberg into “Jew hell,” the maid said.

Initially when I read the MJ article and saw the Spielberg stuff, I just assumed that MJ hated SS because SS must have blocked MJ from having access to children on his sets or something; that SS had [italic]protected[/italic] kids from MJ. But I guess the hatred could have just as easily been a result of them both having been part of a HW pedo ring and SS kicked MJ out of the group when the first allegations surfaced, so MJ felt betrayed and deeply resentful.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 91May 22, 2016 4:48 PM

R86 has a point

by Anonymousreply 92May 22, 2016 4:48 PM

I don't know if people have read the article bc it seems obvious that Elijah was talking about something brewing. I got the impression that he is aware that people are prepared to come forward and we will be hearing about the scandal shortly, just like with the Panama papers

by Anonymousreply 93May 22, 2016 4:49 PM

The full version of Open Secret is online and I think what hurt the documentary besides not being able to get wide release is that it's poorly made. It is also not the explosive, damning exposé that I thought it would be. She tackled the small fishes like casting agents and then spent a great deal of time on the Collins-Rector DEN stuff that's been discussed on DL for years.

by Anonymousreply 94May 22, 2016 4:51 PM

"there's a very specific reason why this will never come out...notice what's identical to all rumoured predators (aside from the fact that they're male)"

Are you the anti-semite troll? Because I seriously doubt all the predators are Jewish. Michael Jackson sure wasn't.

by Anonymousreply 95May 22, 2016 5:01 PM

The rabbit hole goes deep.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 96May 22, 2016 5:07 PM

R95 In Hollywood there could be a chance that most of them are Jews. I would like to see how the Scientologists are involved. There must be some in their ranks. Miss Cabbage looks like he has some unspeakable kinks....

Who has Spielberg molested? Is this just a rumor or are there allegations like from Jackson's accusers.

by Anonymousreply 97May 22, 2016 5:09 PM

R87 you know with your 'I don't believe it blah, blah, blah......'

Mark Salling's arrest shows the extent of the problem. I was shocked when I saw that such a young dude that could get men/women to drop their knickers/pants at a moments' notice would prefer to drool over child porn. It goes to show there's a lot of s*** that goes down in Lala land we would be shocked to know: from snuff movies to children who get raped to all sorts of orgies to who knows what.

Why would somebody like Elijah Wood, excellent actor who is sorted for life with 'the Lord of the Rings' franchise and please see his filmography as actor and producer lie about this? Attention? He just needs to stand at a corner with Dominic Monaghan call the paps and get all the attention he wants.

No. I hope a lot of the ugly stuff from HW sees the light

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 98May 22, 2016 5:09 PM

Someone explain to me how with social media being so powerful, many of these people haven't been taken down? I mean the one R1 mentions, we've been hearing it for years. Why are people still allowing their children to even be around him?

by Anonymousreply 99May 22, 2016 5:10 PM

[quote]An Open Secret FULL DOCUMENTARY

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 100May 22, 2016 5:11 PM

Hmm...Michael Jackson is dead...unless they've revived him I don't see MJ as part of the current pedo ring

[quote]Who has Spielberg molested?

There's a very long list of child actors to try to figure out

Stanley Kubrick was rumoured to be a pedo as well. Spielberg and Kubrick were secret friends, which came to light only after Kubrick died

by Anonymousreply 101May 22, 2016 5:15 PM

Feldman mentioned a major 'Mogul' being involved.

Wood: "'There are a lot of vipers in this industry. There is a darkness in the underbelly - if you can imagine it, it's probably happened.'

Given some of the allegations re: Jimmy Savile, Hampstead, Westminster/Elm Guest House, we're probably looking at an underground Snuff network. Rumors of such buzzed around the Manson killings....

'Open Secret' bordered on a whitewash. Only the low hanging fruit was picked.

by Anonymousreply 102May 22, 2016 5:20 PM

[quote]I don't know if people have read the article bc it seems obvious that Elijah was talking about something brewing. I got the impression that he is aware that people are prepared to come forward and we will be hearing about the scandal shortly, just like with the Panama papers

I'm curious about the lead-in to the question. He was there to discuss his film which has nothing to do with abuse. I think the interviewer asked him about growing up as a child actor in Hollywood and he made is statements based on the line of questioning. And the article was written around those statements to frame it as if Elijah's getting real about sex abuse in Hollywood.

The excerpts from the interview:

Sitting in a Los Angeles restaurant to promote his latest film, The Trust, Wood compares revelations of child abuse in Hollywood with those that surfaced in Britain after the death of entertainer Jimmy Savile. “You all grew up with Savile — Jesus, it must have been devastating,” he said. “Clearly something major was going on in Hollywood. It was all organised. There are a lot of vipers in this industry, people who only have their own interests in mind. There is darkness in the ­underbelly — if you can imagine it, it’s probably happened.

“What upsets me about these situations is that the victims can’t speak as loudly as the people in power. That’s the tragedy of ­attempting to reveal what is happening to innocent people: they can be squashed but their lives have been irreparably damaged.”

Wood says that having seen An Open Secret, he believes the film “only scratches the surface. I feel there was much more to this story than it articulates.”

.. I ask Wood whether he believes this (child sex abuse) is still a problem for Hollywood. “From my reading and ­research,” he says, “I’ve been led down dark paths to realise that these things probably still are happening. If you’re innocent, you have very little knowledge of the world and you want to succeed, people with parasitic interests will see you as their prey.”

by Anonymousreply 103May 22, 2016 5:20 PM

R98, I totally believe children have been raped and molested by a Hollywood pedophile ring. You claim I'm living over the rainbow because I'm unable to make your connection that Elijah Wood and Corey Feldman are either lying or are just as guilty of "sheltering abusers" as the people they are condemning. I'm unwilling to accuse them of being liars (which would mean HW pedophilia doesn't exist) or they are guilty of sheltering abusers. What they know may be entirely hearsay or secondhand information, in which case they would get nowhere by making accusations.

Are you unable to comprehend that most lucid people would not be able to make the same connections you do?

by Anonymousreply 104May 22, 2016 5:26 PM

[quote]Stanley Kubrick was rumoured to be a pedo as well.

As was Arthur C. Clarke, Kubrick's collaborator on 2001: A Space Odyssey.

by Anonymousreply 105May 22, 2016 5:32 PM

Only the low hanging fruit was picked.

by Anonymousreply 106May 22, 2016 5:35 PM

I'm really hoping Spielberg isn't one. The man is my entire childhood.

by Anonymousreply 107May 22, 2016 5:35 PM

Sorry your childhood was that empty, R107.

by Anonymousreply 108May 22, 2016 5:36 PM

R104 if either Elijah and/or Corey had started in the industry as adults I would have dismissed their comments as rumour/gossip/hearsay but they have been child actors. They know an awful lot. Elijah seems to be torn between revealing what he knows (that must be first hand knowledge) or surviving. It's quite odd that in a random interview, among the many he may have done in his life, he's asked about being a child actor and he comes up unprovoked with all this stuff, very strange. He either knows something or he wants to talk. Kudos to him

by Anonymousreply 109May 22, 2016 5:45 PM

Macaulay Culkin, Brad Renfro, River Phoenix, Dana Plato, Jonathan Brandis..If nothing else, H'wood chews up young stars and spits them out unmercifully.

by Anonymousreply 110May 22, 2016 5:46 PM

R105 As I understand it Kubrick used to go to Asia for 'that', he wouldn't do it in the US

by Anonymousreply 111May 22, 2016 5:50 PM

Professions that place adults in charge of children are very attractive to pedos and have a higher percentage than other professions.

Most teachers, coaches, priests, casting directors, etc are not pedos, but it would be more helpful if they weren't so sensitive about being profiled as it's not personal that they are in professions with a high number of pedos.

by Anonymousreply 112May 22, 2016 5:51 PM

I knew the New South Government in Australia was covering up judges under a government "investigation" and the establishment n the mid 90s.

Savile was very close friends with Prince Charles.

by Anonymousreply 113May 22, 2016 5:53 PM

^^^^^correction New South Wales

by Anonymousreply 114May 22, 2016 5:54 PM

I believe him he's not a famewhoring shady character like Corey Feldman.

by Anonymousreply 115May 22, 2016 5:54 PM

There's a thread around here about Burt Lancaster being a pedo. I don't know about Kubrick, I've not heard any rumors.

H'wood is full of children whose parents knowingly threw them at perverts for fame and financial gain. These children were probably conditioned practically from birth to 'expect' certain things. Others were 'discovered' and cultivated.

R113 Nicole Kidman's father was accused and ended up dead.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 116May 22, 2016 5:55 PM

R109, I don't dismiss their comments as rumor/gossip/hearsay. I'm saying that's likely to be the response if they try to get legal authorities involved. It's fairly obvious the police have to be aware of the many accusations that have been made, but they have chosen not to thoroughly investigate. Probably has something to do with the money and power of the accused.

I hope this finally gets some legs under it.

The thing that still amazes me about Penn State is that a prosecutor in that area had the cojones to go up against that powerful institution. Of course Penn State and its powerful backers fought the prosecutors every step of the way.

by Anonymousreply 117May 22, 2016 5:58 PM

R115, maybe Corey Feldman is a "famewhoring shady character" because of his childhood.

by Anonymousreply 118May 22, 2016 6:01 PM

Linked in another thread: Crispin Glover's essay, "What Is It?"

[quote]Wow, I am surprised Spielberg has not sued over that essay. It's pretty blatant. There is something weird about Spielberg and his proteges.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 119May 22, 2016 6:03 PM

I thought of Zayn, R54. He was so beautiful and engaging then spiraled into withdrawal and an eating disorder.

The underaged boybands never seem to have parents around.

Harvey himself was quite taken with a very young Harry Styles, used to gush about him in the press.

by Anonymousreply 120May 22, 2016 6:09 PM

R117, did they ever find the body of the one DA?

by Anonymousreply 121May 22, 2016 6:10 PM

[quote]Macaulay Culkin, Brad Renfro, River Phoenix, Dana Plato, Jonathan Brandis..If nothing else, H'wood chews up young stars and spits them out unmercifully.

You've named five actors, four of whom had parents who were absolute shit, as proof that being a child actor is a dangerous profession. Five out of tens of thousands of actors who "survive" a childhood acting career, and hundreds who actually flourish. But the Idiocracy loves it some conspiracies.

by Anonymousreply 122May 22, 2016 6:11 PM

P I E was full of entertainment industry types along with politicians. Even children's book authors, did you really think Roald Dahl corresponded with tots because he had no other pen pal options?

by Anonymousreply 123May 22, 2016 6:13 PM

Has this thread about Elijah Wood really come this far with no mention of me?

by Anonymousreply 124May 22, 2016 6:14 PM

Kubrick didn't travel. He had Vietnam and New York constructed in England for films because he didn't trust aeroplanes. He was a semi-recluse amid his family in an estate north of London.

by Anonymousreply 125May 22, 2016 6:14 PM

Not as far as I've heard, R121.

by Anonymousreply 126May 22, 2016 6:17 PM

Don't be stupid R122 my list is barely the tip of the iceberg. 1, I've said there are parents who throw their children at perverts and 2., child actors going off the rails in H'wood is so common that entire foundations have sprung up to help them.

by Anonymousreply 127May 22, 2016 6:17 PM

It offers things they value, like fame and $, R99, was that a serious question? Many parents don't give a toss about their kids and see them as a means to an end. Look at PMK or Britney Spears, or around you in life. Incest and pimping out kids or turning a blind eye is shockingly common.

Read The Franklin Cover Up or about Hastert and the Congressional page scandal, those in a position to act are likely compromised.

by Anonymousreply 128May 22, 2016 6:19 PM

R120 I agree with you. Harry and Zayn in particular seem broken. They started out as healthy, normal teenagers and have ended up looking extremely strange. I doubt it boils down to drugs or any sort of addiction. Tons of youngsters nowadays take drugs and don't wind up looking like those two. It's like they have been through shock therapy.

by Anonymousreply 129May 22, 2016 6:19 PM

R97: I can't believe nobody's connecting the dots from Hollywood child molestation to Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew.

This is all one entity. We're ruled by the kingmakers who make sure that only blackmailable pedo Gentiles get into power.

by Anonymousreply 130May 22, 2016 6:24 PM

R129, Justin Bieber is another one. His initial Youtube fame came entirely thanks to his popularity with internet pedophiles, which his mom was only too happy to exploit.

by Anonymousreply 131May 22, 2016 6:28 PM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 132May 22, 2016 6:45 PM

R130 Sort of.

It's just like the Mafia, with different 'families' with their own 'boss' 'don' or 'Kingpin' ruling their particular area of the network.

Epstein is a 'financier' the same way Tony Soprano was in 'Waste Management'. It amuses me that people believe he made BILLIONS with one client to his name, that we know of. What he is, is a top tier trafficker to the elite. There are other traffickers who specialize in the grubbier aspects of the network, namely snuff/porn/prostitutes sold on the 'streets'. The higher it goes the more exclusive, specialized, and expensive the 'product'. In one sense you are correct: the lower tier couldn't operate without the express permission of the higher echelons, which receives it's cut or 'tribute', of course.

Then you get into the mulit-generational abuse families, who deliberately produce and 'grow' highly sought after 'product' for use in the network. JonBenet for instance most likely succumbed to the use of the 'kingpin' of her particular 'family network'. [thus forcing the parents to take her lifeless body home and hastily stage an aborted abduction] Madeleine McCann may have been sacrificed for the enrichment and advancement of her parents, who have since gone on the travel in exclusive circles using money fraudulently obtained from the public and by suing people who disagreed with the party line.

by Anonymousreply 133May 22, 2016 6:46 PM

As a continuation of the above, I'd be verrrrrry interested to learn who rules the "Hollywood Network". I think we all have our suspicions.

by Anonymousreply 134May 22, 2016 7:01 PM

NOW will you believe that I was molested?

by Anonymousreply 135May 22, 2016 7:04 PM

[quote]It's just like the Mafia, with different 'families' with their own 'boss' 'don' or 'Kingpin' ruling their particular area of the network.

The Mafia also has its hands in show business, and so by proxy does the Catholic Church. For years, the film industry had to appease the Catholic League as well as the Production Code office.

by Anonymousreply 136May 22, 2016 7:07 PM

Corey Feldman said the same years ago. Predictably, no one cared because his career is not active and he's not a sex symbol.

by Anonymousreply 137May 22, 2016 7:08 PM

Elijah is not a sex symbol, dear!

...well, maybe he was 25 years ago. BUT NOT NOW!

by Anonymousreply 138May 22, 2016 7:17 PM

R119 see R41

by Anonymousreply 139May 22, 2016 7:19 PM

Why doesn't spielberg being a predator get talked about here? Is dl scared of that powerful pedo?

by Anonymousreply 140May 22, 2016 7:22 PM

We've already talked about it before...more than once

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 141May 22, 2016 7:26 PM

Who's the queen behind Spielberg? This was when S.S. was traveling with his family in Portofino, including his son Sawyer on the left

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 142May 22, 2016 7:41 PM

R142 Thine link worketh not.

by Anonymousreply 143May 22, 2016 7:43 PM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 144May 22, 2016 7:43 PM

That's me!!!!

Oops. Nope, not me.

by Anonymousreply 145May 22, 2016 7:45 PM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 146May 22, 2016 7:58 PM

As awful as some of these accusations are, some also seem laced with homophobia unfortunately.

by Anonymousreply 147May 22, 2016 8:02 PM

How so, R147?

I think it's a danger, sure, but more often than not the homophobia accusation is tossed around in these discussions for the same reason that the anti-semitic accusation is tossed around in I/P discussions.

by Anonymousreply 148May 22, 2016 8:58 PM


by Anonymousreply 149May 22, 2016 9:01 PM

I'm trying to imagine what Elijah Wood would be up against if he named names. Feldman too. As these fellas must know, depending on the power and reputations of the names involved [and the number of people who depend upon them for their livelihoods] the level of PR manufactured push-back could get frightening. Not to mention the fear of 'accidents' or 'suicide'.

by Anonymousreply 150May 22, 2016 9:08 PM

[quote]Three boys were killed in the UK Pedo ring.

Not quite.

A man who was afforded anonymity by the police and known by the pseudonym 'Nick' made a series of allegations over many years, including legations that he had been abused by his step-father who handed him over to politician and entertainers in the 1970's for further abuse. Nick's claims culminated about 2 years ago in him telling the police he had witnessed the death of three boys. One of these boys 'Nick' claims was run over by Nick's abusers, in broad daylight, in a suburb of SW London called Kingston. Nick claimed this boy was his friend, but oddly, did not know his surname. There were no accounts of such a death in the media of the time, and no records at any hospital or police station of any such event ever having taken place. In short, Nick made a false allegation.

No evidence of any kind has been found by the Metropolitan police's 'Operation Midland' that Nick was present at the death of three boys. The operation was wound up recently without any charges. The investigation cost UK tax payers millions. Nick may well have been abused in childhood, and have developed some kind of delusional disorder as a result. But his stories did not add up. Plenty of actual, factual child abuse takes place. There's no need to promote false allegations.

[quote]Even a journalist,Jill Dando, was killed because of her knowledge about the ring.

There is no evidence of this. It is internet speculation. Various theories have been circulating for years about Dando's death, including that she was killed by Balkan gangsters in revenge for a 'Crimewatch'' appeal Dando hosted on the BBC.

by Anonymousreply 151May 22, 2016 9:18 PM

Interesting article from 2014. Please scroll down to the comment section and a guy called George Kohler.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 152May 22, 2016 9:19 PM

r150 I think your reasons are valid, but not the entire angle. Part of the reason he's not naming names is the difference between industry truisms and objective proof that would pass muster in a legal challenge.

Many people in Hollywood "knew" about Bill Cosby-but really, what did they know? A trusted booker would tell a comedian about a woman they knew he assaulted; a crew member might have seen a woman coming out of dressing room, disoriented and unbuttoned, etc. All of these stories have origins in truth, and are spread throughout the industry. People had colleagues and friends whom they trusted tell of incidents, but it's not obvious how pervasive it is until the story breaks.

That's why Sinbad can say what he did, i.e. that he felt some women were credible, but not others, and he was worried about bringing a black man down; and Patton Oswalt can say that he thought everyone knew, and they are really both not lying.

by Anonymousreply 153May 22, 2016 9:21 PM

Does anyone remember the case of Victor Salva? He was a convicted pedophile but was still allowed to direct movies like "Powder" starring Mary Steenburgen. She even defended him saying that his art redeemed him.

He's directing the third "Jeepers Creepers".

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 154May 22, 2016 9:23 PM

r152, why do you think the rantings of some random mentally ill antisemite are of particular interest to us?

by Anonymousreply 155May 22, 2016 9:23 PM

Uh oh, here come the apologists.

"Nick claimed this boy was his friend, but oddly, did not know his surname."

I remember a boy named Jesse from my childhood. For the life of me I can't remember his surname. Is it so hard to believe that children in that situation may not care about noting down the surname of another child even if they are 'close'?

"There were no accounts of such a death in the media of the time, and no records at any hospital or police station of any such event ever having taken place. In short, Nick made a false allegation. "

Do you know how many children are disappeared into the UK child 'care' system?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 156May 22, 2016 9:24 PM

Seriously the surname argument, wtf, that post creeped me out.

I would hope those murders are made up, but I will hardly take the fact that a child doesn't know another's surname as proof of that.

by Anonymousreply 157May 22, 2016 9:31 PM

Does Elijah know something about Johnny Gosch? Or Ashton K?

by Anonymousreply 158May 22, 2016 9:36 PM

It seems pretty obvious they put Daphne Aguilera through the wringer:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 159May 22, 2016 9:39 PM

Bitter closeted aging boytoy who has been passed around Hollywood since he was 12 rediscovers his sense of morality after his career stalls. Never heard of such a thing.

by Anonymousreply 160May 22, 2016 9:39 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 161May 22, 2016 9:40 PM

You all realize we are talking about heinous crimes not Law and Order:SVU episodes.

Certainly we need to avoid R112 's suggestion. Depriving people who are jobs which bring them into contact with children of their civil rights. We can't even deprive pedophiles of their civil rights - although I'm amazed at the number of people who are OK with this.

Our first line of defense is to listen to law enforcement and then let them do their jobs. Ordinarily I'm not much of a supporter of law enforcement but in this case it seems appropriate. It would seem to be Wood is in a perfect position to do this. He doesn't need to hold a press conference and name names. He doesn't even need to walk into a police station. He can hire attorneys to act as his surrogate. The problem is he may not have information that is useful - if what he has is memories of stories told a ten year old by other ten year olds. I don't know.

I think a witch hunt for big name pedophiles in the entertainment industry is a distraction. Suggesting careers will be ruined if they report cases of sexual abuse feels more like an excuse rather than a legitimate reason to report what you have experienced or witnessed.

by Anonymousreply 162May 22, 2016 9:41 PM

This is news? Why are people shocked at this?

Elijah Wood is apparently a cum dump according to people who have fucked him and posted about it on DL.

by Anonymousreply 163May 22, 2016 9:43 PM

Seriously R160. And we're supposed to feel sympathy for twinks who attend Bryan Singer pool parties...twinks who literally go there to get fucked and get ahead.

by Anonymousreply 164May 22, 2016 9:43 PM

R56 nonsense, you've been reading way too many poorly written Dennis Cooper and Dan Brown novels.

by Anonymousreply 165May 22, 2016 9:44 PM

My goodness but the pedos and their enablers must have received their marching orders. Wondering if they use Megaphone?

by Anonymousreply 166May 22, 2016 9:47 PM

[quote]Seriously the surname argument, wtf, that post creeped me out.

Why? It was one aspect, among many, that led the police to the conclusion that there was no evidence to support Nick's allegations.

If a kid is run over, in the street, in a hit-and-run, in London, then that leads to a chain of events. 1) random passersby see the body 2) an ambulance is called and that call logged 3) the ambulance takes the kid to a hospital 4) records are created, doctors and nurses attend to the victim 4) if the kid was indeed 'killed' as Nick claims, there would be a funeral, a burial / cremation, and usually, given it was a child, some coverage in the local media. 5) Nick , as the principal witness, would have been questioned by police officers and a statement taken. The victim's school would have a record of the child's death, as would the child's doctor.

etc, etc , etc.

by Anonymousreply 167May 22, 2016 10:03 PM

A little too close to home, r162? We can all guess why you're not a fan of law enforcement.

This is not about people who have contact with children, this is about more closely monitoring those who are in careers that give them power over children. If those in those professions truly cared about the welfare of children, like they claim, they would welcome the added protections for children.

by Anonymousreply 168May 22, 2016 10:05 PM

[quote]Uh oh, here come the apologists.

Grow up.

I am well aware of the endemic levels of abuse suffered by children in all countries and from all walks of life. It does NOTHING to help those victims to spread false allegations on the internet - it simply f=gives abusers ammunition to claim victims and their supporters are 'nuts'.

Learn to distinguish between facts and fictions. Also learn to accept that some people who have suffered abuse in childhood may have psychiatric problems - very understandably - and everything they say may not be simple fact.

by Anonymousreply 169May 22, 2016 10:08 PM

R168 willfully misconstrued r162 's post. I wonder what she's trying to deflect.

by Anonymousreply 170May 22, 2016 10:08 PM

R168, how should these people be closely monitored? Should a police officer shadow all male executives??

by Anonymousreply 171May 22, 2016 10:09 PM

The police are NEVER going to find evidence to support allegations of elite, organized pedophilia. If you really believe these investigations are sincere and anything other than an attempt to appease a lot of angry plebes, well I have a bridge I'd like to sell you.

Right now as I speak Operation Grange is wrapping up a 15m£ investigation in the the ABDUCTION of Madeleine McCann. Her possible death is not allowed as part of the 'remit' in spite of the fact that cadaver and blood dogs hit on numerous items, ALL of which belonged exclusively to the McCanns. Why would they do this? Ask Phillip Edmonds, nephew of Margaret Hodge, who was implicated in the Islington child sex scandal but who went on to become AMBASSADOR FOR CHILDREN. You could not make this shizz up.

by Anonymousreply 172May 22, 2016 10:09 PM

R59, But I said, "No, no, no."

by Anonymousreply 173May 22, 2016 10:09 PM

R172 Margaret Hodge is one among MANY UK politicians who need to examine their consciences over their failures to act in defence of children. Jeremy Corbyn is another. I wonder why you single out Hodge? Thatcher knew Peter Morrison was a paedophile and still employed him.

by Anonymousreply 174May 22, 2016 10:12 PM

R172 is correct. The Australian film "The Everlasting Secret Family" is not fiction. If rich men want anything, they're going to get it....because everything sadly has a price.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 175May 22, 2016 10:14 PM

r160 that doesn't make him wrong. It makes him immoral, but it doesn't make him wrong.

by Anonymousreply 176May 22, 2016 10:16 PM

R174 Because her nephew Edmonds was present on that very peculiar holiday in Portugal with his two sons, and even claimed to have photos of his children with Maddie in the background. He beat a hast retreat, early, the minute the Maddie news broke or perhaps even just ahead of it, I'm not sure I 'd have to check back..

by Anonymousreply 177May 22, 2016 10:16 PM

*hasty retreat

by Anonymousreply 178May 22, 2016 10:18 PM

[quote] It makes him immoral

Some people would find this discussion immoral

by Anonymousreply 179May 22, 2016 10:20 PM

So Kubrick made a movie about powerful men involved in occult and deviant (aka, "sex magick") practices, and his stars are a major Scieno and his wife, the daughter of an accused pedo.

Yes, I'm sure there are nothing but coincidences in life.

by Anonymousreply 180May 22, 2016 10:34 PM

redrectum! redrectum!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 181May 22, 2016 10:38 PM

Redrectum!? I barely knew him!

by Anonymousreply 182May 22, 2016 10:40 PM

Having worked with EW, he's one of the few child actors who grew up to be a professional, courteous and "normal" adults. He doesn't gossip, and he is not prone to exaggeration.

Victor Salva visited one of my sets, and that dude is super creepy and really hideous looking.

I recently worked for a Nickelodeon project and had to be subjected to a pretty thorough background check- when I asked about it, they were screening for past sex offenders, particularly pedophiles.

by Anonymousreply 183May 22, 2016 10:41 PM

"adults" should be "adult".

by Anonymousreply 184May 22, 2016 10:41 PM

We all saw how long it took a group of grown women to finally call Bill Cosby out. I think many of these kids spend the rest of their lives just trying to forget. Talking about it simply brings the pain to the surface. How could they ever trust anyone again with this information after their own parents allowed them to be with these "important people"

by Anonymousreply 185May 22, 2016 10:53 PM

Tell us about the others who weren't so well adjusted, r183.

From what I know about EW, his biggest problem was having been home-schooled and subjected to a certain amount of propaganda. He won't outwardly blame his mother but there is more obvious resentment than there should be for a person of his age. To make a long story short, much of what he grew up believing at the hands of his mother was not replicated in his life as an adult. Mostly he feels cheated by being home schooled.

by Anonymousreply 186May 22, 2016 10:56 PM

R151 Bullshit. You are part of the disinformation campaign. Try your bullshit elsewhere. If you like diddling young boys you will pay one day.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 187May 22, 2016 11:03 PM

R185, or maybe they're doing just fine and cultivating healthy, fun lives. We should probably encourage them to derail their careers and publicly speak about it though. Because reasons.

by Anonymousreply 188May 22, 2016 11:05 PM

There is something heartbreaking about the film A.I., the film that Spielberg took over after Kubrick died. I hope this is not it.

by Anonymousreply 189May 22, 2016 11:06 PM

Why go to "authorities" when you are very aware of the tentacles of corruption, criminality, and conspiracy within the judicial system?

by Anonymousreply 190May 22, 2016 11:06 PM

R108, you're why I still love DL.

by Anonymousreply 191May 22, 2016 11:10 PM

Yes, R190. But more importantly, why go to authorities when you still need to work in Hollywood!? People act to make a(n extremely comfortable) living.

by Anonymousreply 192May 22, 2016 11:13 PM

Sorry R186, EW?

by Anonymousreply 193May 22, 2016 11:14 PM

Elton John

Paul McCartney

Stephen Fry

by Anonymousreply 194May 22, 2016 11:14 PM

R193 didn't read the entire thread title. He saw "pedophile" and reflex clicked.

by Anonymousreply 195May 22, 2016 11:16 PM

R151, the Metropolitan Police had no clue about Jack the Ripper, either---except for the clue they erased.

by Anonymousreply 196May 22, 2016 11:18 PM

R188 Reasons being the longer these monsters are free the more children are being victimized, you vile creature.

by Anonymousreply 197May 22, 2016 11:18 PM

Remember Leelee Sobieski's character in Eyes Wide Shot

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 198May 22, 2016 11:18 PM

Shut not Shot

by Anonymousreply 199May 22, 2016 11:19 PM

Eyes Wide Shut is a fucking masterpiece... still, I can't help but wonder if Kubrick's final cut was altered after his death, before the release...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 200May 22, 2016 11:22 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 201May 22, 2016 11:23 PM

Some call growing your own victim

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 202May 22, 2016 11:25 PM

R201, maybe he was just schizophrenic? Some people are just schizophrenic.

by Anonymousreply 203May 22, 2016 11:28 PM

R200 As I'm sure you must be aware, Spielberg did the final edit on EWS. It was certainly altered..

by Anonymousreply 204May 22, 2016 11:28 PM

R202 - yikes! What a disturbing thought.

by Anonymousreply 205May 22, 2016 11:28 PM

R203 schizophrenia = coping mechanism

by Anonymousreply 206May 22, 2016 11:31 PM

Spielberg loves to traumatize kids in his movies. Almost all of them are about kids being attacked or traumatized. His new project is about a kidnapped kid. Remember Cary Duffey from Close Encounters of the Third Kind, you know the little kid that was virtually tortured on screen when abducted by aliens. It's something I could never get used to in his films. And the rumour makes me go hmm...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 207May 22, 2016 11:32 PM

R195 not really. It's just that I believe R186's description of Elijah is so inaccurate that I thought he was referring to someone else.

by Anonymousreply 208May 22, 2016 11:32 PM

Pushed in media

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 209May 22, 2016 11:35 PM

R206, your armchair psychology checks out. Early adult schizophrenia is clearly caused by (not even) alleged rape.

by Anonymousreply 210May 22, 2016 11:36 PM

Pushed by "academics"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 211May 22, 2016 11:39 PM

Wow, I trust Elijah, and what he has to say. The pedophiles have to be people in Hollywood with enormous power, not just some AD or loser, low-level producer. People have guessed that it is rob reiner. This is mainly for their links to Corey and River. Or it's the financier for their films, and they looked the other way..

It a hard thing to prove. So they know, but if they name names, they will be sued. Look at what Woody Allen did to Dylan and Ronan. Rob Reiner does not work anymore, so maybe it was him, and the industry banned him from working. Just it is not public. I hope it is not Spielberg. I think Corey said it is not Spielberg.

by Anonymousreply 212May 22, 2016 11:39 PM

More attempts by elites to use media to normalize pedo s and to make the "poor, poor pedo" the "REAL victim"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 213May 22, 2016 11:42 PM

R212 it's not only Spielberg or Reiner -there are lots of them!

by Anonymousreply 214May 22, 2016 11:43 PM

Simon Cowell protected elite.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 215May 22, 2016 11:45 PM

Rob Reiner still works

Besides he's so rich from Seinfeld that he doesn't have to work

by Anonymousreply 216May 22, 2016 11:45 PM

Lots of men want toddlers to suck on their adult thumbs, practice, you know?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 217May 22, 2016 11:46 PM

R215, pimped young boys out to elite is more accurate.

by Anonymousreply 218May 22, 2016 11:47 PM

Aaaaaand this thread just reached the tipping point where it's turned into a conspiracy theory echo chamber.

Yes folks, rich people do things that you don't know about.

by Anonymousreply 219May 22, 2016 11:48 PM

Anonymous said... Interesting the mention of Stephen Fry. He is a member of the groucho club,there websites forum was involved in a child pornography scandal in recent years.

ts true to say the BBC is an arm of the intelligence apparatus, i could name several people like savile, stephen Fry was due to play a part in the play about the Philby/Burgess/Mclean fiasco, the police were brought in as a would be blackmailer tried to blackmail stephen for picking up young boys in his aston-martin and taking them back to his home in Norfolk, the uposhot was stephen ran away and hid until the police could sort it out for him.The BBC covered for him and savile, and esther rantzen covered for jimmy savile too anyone want to hear about cyril Smith ?

by Anonymousreply 220May 22, 2016 11:52 PM

Report to law enforcement?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 221May 22, 2016 11:53 PM

R220 I actually believe he got married to brush off a lot of the rumours. Then there's all the suicide attempts. There's going to be a whole load of shit that surfaces about Fry when he dies.

by Anonymousreply 222May 22, 2016 11:55 PM

R50, it is curious you brought up NORTH. Since I was unfamiliar with the film NORTH, I looked it up. While Bruce Willis had a cameo, per IMDB, it is the film debut of 9 year old Scarlett Johansson.


by Anonymousreply 223May 22, 2016 11:57 PM

R222, Fry recently made comments that victims of child abuse should stop whining and get over it.

by Anonymousreply 224May 23, 2016 12:00 AM

Elijah was good friends with Macaulay Culkin. Supposedly they remained friends through their teens and early 20's. There are even rumors that it was sexual. There were rumors that Mac was pimped out by his horrible father Kit Culkin. Maybe that is what he is referring to.

by Anonymousreply 225May 23, 2016 12:01 AM

R224 And then was promptly made to apologise by his frantic PR team for the comment. The trouble with Fry is that he knows EVERYONE on both sides of the pond. It's going to be a deep rabbit hole if his secrets ever come out.

by Anonymousreply 226May 23, 2016 12:05 AM

Society as a whole discounts the voices of women and children (including former child stars, who support their families and so suffer in silence), even when obviously abused (See: Simpson, Nicole).

Trans-genderism is a pincer in the Agenda of sexualizing children. Force them and society to focus on their genitals and gender for elementary-school checklists. Make little girls accept the presence of males in locker rooms, changing rooms, and bathroom.

The other pincer is, of course, actual pedophilia by powerful, and often even beloved by society in general, men. Men about whom, regardless of clues and connections, our minds refuse to countenance such depravity. Men who consort with, say, Jeff Epstein.

BTW: You don't suppose all those SE Asian or Eastern European child-porn victims live to adulthood, do you?

by Anonymousreply 227May 23, 2016 12:05 AM

[quote] Why go to "authorities" when you are very aware of the tentacles of corruption, criminality, and conspiracy within the judicial system?

Last refuge of a pedophile enabler.

Something tells me the straight women on this thread know all the tricks and excuses, the very same tricks and excuses the used to cover up for their husbands. On another site one of them claimed her husband was railroaded and when that didn't pass muster she claimed he was drunk and drugged.

Let's just say women don't know much about male anatomy.

by Anonymousreply 228May 23, 2016 12:06 AM

R228, you are a complete idiot. CLEARLY my post was to incriminate so-called "law enforcement," NOT to "enable" pedophiles. Only the most willful misreading would conclude that.

Yes, I'm a Frau, and I know that your example has nothing to do with "male anatomy."

by Anonymousreply 229May 23, 2016 12:17 AM

I know what you said r229, it's the excuse you wives of serial pedophiles use every time.

you've done nothing but make excuses for NOT reporting pedophilia. Are you really a woman? Or is your husband suspect?

Hopefully people like you won't scare victims away from reporting what has happenened to them, try as you might.

by Anonymousreply 230May 23, 2016 12:23 AM

[quote]From what I know about EW, his biggest problem was having been home-schooled and subjected to a certain amount of propaganda. He won't outwardly blame his mother but there is more obvious resentment than there should be for a person of his age. To make a long story short, much of what he grew up believing at the hands of his mother was not replicated in his life as an adult. Mostly he feels cheated by being home schooled.

A read a profile of him a year back and there doesn't seem to be any issue with his mother. However, he has issues with his father. The resentment in that relationship is heavy.

by Anonymousreply 231May 23, 2016 12:26 AM

Of course a woman with MOMMIE ISSUES would have trouble believing he might have issues with a controlling mother who home schooled him, in a very conservative way.

by Anonymousreply 232May 23, 2016 12:29 AM

"Mark Salling's arrest shows the extent of the problem. I was shocked when I saw that such a young dude that could get men/women to drop their knickers/pants at a moments' notice would prefer to drool over child porn. It goes to show there's a lot of s*** that goes down in Lala land we would be shocked to know: from snuff movies to children who get raped to all sorts of orgies to who knows what."

So if one guy from Hollywood has child porn....it's okay to make generalizations about all people in Hollywood? If someone from Dubuque gets caught with child porn, do you make generalizations about all people from Dubuque?

by Anonymousreply 233May 23, 2016 12:35 AM

"It makes you wonder what really happened to Jake Lloyd. The guy is suffering from schizophrenia now"

Schizophrenia isn't caused by sexual abuse, it's a little more complicated than that

by Anonymousreply 234May 23, 2016 12:37 AM

[quote]Wood is a sloppy cum loving bottom. You happy now??

From below thread.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 235May 23, 2016 12:43 AM

R183 yet Wood is deeply closeted about being gay, and into barebacking and probably HIV+.

by Anonymousreply 236May 23, 2016 12:44 AM

Jake Lloyd's schizophrenia no doubt stems from high school students teasing him for being such a terrible actor.

by Anonymousreply 237May 23, 2016 12:44 AM

Oh so now it's descended into character assassination. You Megaphonies are paid too much no matter what you earn . You're ~~much too obvious.

by Anonymousreply 238May 23, 2016 12:46 AM

Nope, Jake Lloyd's schizophrenia no doubt stems from George Lucas' penis. The medical evidence is clear.

by Anonymousreply 239May 23, 2016 12:47 AM

R230, not married. Yes, a woman. I'm sorry you are not only misunderstanding me, but also confusing me with posters not me. I have posted about pedophilia rings, Jeffrey Epstein and his powerful male pals, police corruption (Read: pedos in the higher ranks, same with judges), etc.

Am I "offering excuses for pedophiles"? For not reporting crimes? Apparently, in your insistence. In reality, I believe pedophilia is THE major goal of those Kubrick was revealing in EWS, outside of impoverishing humanity on the way to de-population.

In sum, I believe Elijah, as I believe Dylan. I wish all child sexual abuse victims would report their abusers. I also wish justice would result. But watch and read, after these next words of mine.. Let's see who the DL "enablers" are:

I believe the McMartin accusers.

by Anonymousreply 240May 23, 2016 1:01 AM

I remember reading this essay about SS's possible ped tendencies back in the mid-1990s. It blew my mind.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 241May 23, 2016 1:07 AM

R56, Do you only think 3 boys were killed in England in the Jmmy Saville pedo et al scandals? I just posted a video released a couple of months ago that started filming a few months after his death. Why did it take so long to to be exposed?

R59, We must accept that there are a couple of sicko Trolls who will label anyone with the same extremely silly monikers if they disagree with any part of your posts. Please join me in pitying those who have absolutely NO life at all. Otherwise they'd find something else to do with their time.

by Anonymousreply 242May 23, 2016 1:17 AM

R241 Yes that essay is on point

by Anonymousreply 243May 23, 2016 1:21 AM

R86, What's identical of all of the pedophiles in Hollywood is that they're all famous. You would be surprised at how pervasive pedophilia is in society. Worldwide there are a small per cent of children that reach adulthood without ever being molested by at least one person without their consent.

by Anonymousreply 244May 23, 2016 1:43 AM

R116's link is the most disturbing thing I think I've read in my life.

by Anonymousreply 245May 23, 2016 2:00 AM

There's nothing homophobic about this discussion. Most of the predators don't even identify as gay. and do you honestly think this doesn't happen to girls too?

by Anonymousreply 246May 23, 2016 2:24 AM

It's said to be an important means of control of politicians and elites, see Franklin, DC Madame, Epstein, etc.

Thought Epstein was running a honeypot, possibly for multiple security interests?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 247May 23, 2016 2:28 AM

Regarding Steven Spielberg, why do you think Amy was awarded 100 million in their divorce after only a 4 year marriage? She knows where the bodies are buried. Unless the children who were/ are molested come forward, nothing will ever change. Maybe not even then. I do believe this goes deep and is far reaching. Lots of dirt to be had on politicians, police and judges.

by Anonymousreply 248May 23, 2016 2:33 AM

R116, I've seen postings by T who wish to be auctioned off and used in hunts such as those described, as women, words fail. No idea if they were used in such a way as children or if perhaps they have fetishized and dehumanized it? Did not remind me of a "woman's soul!" Children around the world have made similar allegations, auctions, hunting parties, drugging, etc. Kidman was a fall guy, like Sandusky, far from a lone actor.

by Anonymousreply 249May 23, 2016 2:38 AM

[quote]why do you think Amy was awarded 100 million in their divorce after only a 4 year marriage?


Always thought that was over-the-top. Still is by today's standards

by Anonymousreply 250May 23, 2016 2:40 AM

Eyes Wide Shut info scrubbed?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 251May 23, 2016 2:43 AM

reddit is deleting and restricting the discussion thread about this

by Anonymousreply 252May 23, 2016 2:55 AM

R248 and R250 - So let's just jump to bizarre conclusions based upon an adjudicated divorce settlement. One in which a judge dismissed the prenuptial agreement Spielberg penned on a napkin without legal representation. Are you suggesting Irving told the judge she knew where the bodies were buried so he ruled in her favor even though Spielberg fought to enforce the prenup?

You start with a sloppy prenup and then end up with a net worth of a billion dollars - guess what your ex will go after every penny he/she can get.

by Anonymousreply 253May 23, 2016 3:04 AM

Great link R241

by Anonymousreply 254May 23, 2016 3:07 AM

I am sure Drew Barrymore had her share of bad times growing up. There were the drugs and alcohol abuse. I believe she was sexually anyone's at one point. But, she has pulled herself together pretty well.

Also, Brooke Shields. Nobody could get past her mother.

by Anonymousreply 255May 23, 2016 3:08 AM

Another cough, board, cough, deleted many threads about Epstein.

Nothing new to see here, move along folks!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 256May 23, 2016 3:09 AM

Why would Reddit censor this?

by Anonymousreply 257May 23, 2016 3:14 AM

So the story went R255. Teri was a raging alcoholic and oil shieks were gifting the young teen with jewels, not sure I believe the mama bear narrative any more than I do the one about dating George Michael or Michael Jackson.

Protective does not track with Pretty Baby or those Calvin Klien commercials but it does reassure and deflect nicely, hmmmm? Those stories about her mother kissing her on the moth in front of journos did have a bit of a squick factor though....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 258May 23, 2016 3:17 AM

No, she ran those pedos off at every turn!


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 259May 23, 2016 3:19 AM

Why might anyone think the entertainment industry has any connection to pedos? I just don't get it!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 260May 23, 2016 3:23 AM

People read too much into wholesome photos! Wholesome, I swear!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 261May 23, 2016 3:25 AM

Who is directing such photo shoots? Who is the target audience for the snaps?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 262May 23, 2016 3:27 AM

I remember Pete Townsend from The Who was arrested for having pedo material or something...can't remember, it's been a while...Isn't there rumors about Cliff Richards as well? Didn't the police search his house or something?

by Anonymousreply 263May 23, 2016 3:32 AM

[quote]Why would Reddit censor this?

see for yoursef

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 264May 23, 2016 3:34 AM


by Anonymousreply 265May 23, 2016 3:34 AM

His statements seem super credible, yeah?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 266May 23, 2016 3:35 AM

R253 what judge would accept a prenup written on a napkin? That was theatre. Amy didn't have to say anything to the judge to get that thrown out of court.

by Anonymousreply 267May 23, 2016 3:40 AM

The pedophile rings will never be brought down completely. The entertainment industry can buy their way around law enforcement.

by Anonymousreply 268May 23, 2016 3:42 AM

That's because law enforcement is easily bought.

by Anonymousreply 269May 23, 2016 3:42 AM

R227 Not one of the predators mentioned is transgender. You're just a fucked up bigot.

by Anonymousreply 270May 23, 2016 3:45 AM

R253 The napkin prenup was revoked during a hearing, not the divorce proceeding. Even if Spielberg did make 200 mil from 1985 to 1989, and the divorce was pending for a year, judges don't just hand over 100 million that easily, but think what you want. Have you ever heard of that happening in any other divorce? No. And, he could've fought her tooth and nail but chose not to. You have to ask why.

Brooke's mother was a drugged out drunk. She not only didn't protect her daughter but subjected her to all kinds of nasty. Mommy Dearest would pass out at Studio 54 and leave Brooke to the hounds. Brooke is not stable and never has been.

by Anonymousreply 271May 23, 2016 3:45 AM

God, I hate Reddit

The only thing you need to know about S.S. is that Crispin Glover essay and the one at R241

Oh and also that hunky man who wanted to rape Spielberg and was sent to jail...wtf was that all about?

by Anonymousreply 272May 23, 2016 3:47 AM

Or corrupted to start with, R269.

Which one in Branson' s hot tub is still a teen?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 273May 23, 2016 4:03 AM

HW out with the young, the pretty and one rumored to be quite kinky. Harry maybe 18?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 274May 23, 2016 4:07 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 275May 23, 2016 4:09 AM

r272 Reddit was great until they decided to monetize it; that's when the censoring started. They ignored their mods, too, until they finally rebelled. That's why, as much as I bitch about DL's decline and loss of decent gossip, I still appreciate it.

On topic, I think a true Black Swan event will be the only thing to finally expose the giant pedophile ring. The UK has done more than one investigation, but they are investigating themselves, since many senior LEOs and politicians have been implicated.

by Anonymousreply 276May 23, 2016 4:11 AM

Crispin Glover is a psychopathic bigot. Isn't there a better source than him?

by Anonymousreply 277May 23, 2016 4:17 AM

Birds of a feather? Or some type of fixer?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 278May 23, 2016 4:18 AM

r277 why a bigot? He's not mentally stable, but not a psychopath, either.

by Anonymousreply 279May 23, 2016 4:19 AM

The media are going to call this out? Wouldn't bet on it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 280May 23, 2016 4:20 AM

r226 Fry strikes me as a classic ephebophile, of the Death in Venice variety.

While I'm not excusing that, a 16-17 year old is totally different from a 6-7 year old.

by Anonymousreply 281May 23, 2016 4:24 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 282May 23, 2016 4:25 AM

He does seem very strange.

by Anonymousreply 283May 23, 2016 4:26 AM

I remember reading the charging documents for Jeffrey Epstein. His penis is deformed. His penis is egg-shaped!!!

by Anonymousreply 284May 23, 2016 4:26 AM

I think dating a 17 year old these days is no big deal if other person is also around the same age. Kids grow up so much faster these days. Very sad really...not much of a childhood.

by Anonymousreply 285May 23, 2016 4:28 AM

Pretty obvious the straight women on this thread are so well-versed in the subject because they are enablers. They come up with the most inventive reasons, elaborate conspiracy theories, to. NOT report the crimes.

All of you will burn in hell along with whoever you are trying so had to protect.


Look at the string of victims so far, all because of YOU, the people who use scare tactics disguised as mass pedophile conspiracies to scare victims away from reporting to the authorities! You're trying so hard to convince victims their complaints will fall on deaf ears.

We know who you are protecting!

Deplorable, hateful, criminal old women!

by Anonymousreply 286May 23, 2016 4:29 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 287May 23, 2016 4:29 AM

Re R282, he was 20 and used to pick her up from school, she was a sophomore.

These themes carried through his movies, Manhattan had his character picking up Mariel Hemmingway from school.

by Anonymousreply 288May 23, 2016 4:33 AM

These creepy deliniations, like at R281, strike me as pedo speak.

by Anonymousreply 289May 23, 2016 4:35 AM

More about Elijah being a cum dumpster please.

by Anonymousreply 290May 23, 2016 4:36 AM

R287 doesn't want pedophilia reported. She's giving reasons discouraging reporting it. Why?

by Anonymousreply 291May 23, 2016 4:37 AM

This is gross.

Never knew Savage was a N A M B L A booster. Inter generational sex? Kids "seducing" adults?

Puts "The Kid" in a different light as does their attic "Attic for Men" BDSM dungeon in "family" home with young son.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 292May 23, 2016 4:41 AM

Damn, Cowell seems like more of a skeevy sleeze than ever.

by Anonymousreply 293May 23, 2016 4:45 AM

Cowell' s rumored boyfriend is a hypnotist f all creepy things, and seems like a real prize.

Cowell has very active online scrubbers, likely means something. Scrubbed out of Google cache too.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 294May 23, 2016 4:46 AM

A fucking hypnotist! Who would feel ok with having one of those around 24/7?

by Anonymousreply 295May 23, 2016 4:48 AM

Spielberg's divorce settlement is still listed in the top five most costliest divorces in hollywood

In today's terms, Amy's $100 million back in 1989 would be $196 million in 2016

In 2016, that would put their divorce in the no 2 spot (the Arnold / Maria Shriver divorce is still not settled).

Only for a 4 year marriage (yes, they dated before that)

So yeah, it was payment to silence her

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 296May 23, 2016 5:02 AM

Lol, right?

Article does make him sound like a creep, a very hetero creep. Ding, ding!

Cowell has a child as do many of the folks in the Epstein article above, Couric, Stephanopolis, etc. Parenthood + pedo friends? Yuck.

by Anonymousreply 297May 23, 2016 5:03 AM

I have always mistrusted George Lucas.

by Anonymousreply 298May 23, 2016 5:03 AM

What about Lukas. Haas, did his parents watch over him?

by Anonymousreply 299May 23, 2016 5:06 AM

I always wondered about Richard Donner, no one knew him?

by Anonymousreply 300May 23, 2016 5:12 AM

[quote]Elijah Wood talks about pedophile ring in Hollywood

Hollywood response : Let's crank out more anti-Catholic films

by Anonymousreply 301May 23, 2016 5:15 AM

[quote] Hollywood response : Let's crank out more anti-Catholic films

The truth is anti-Catholic. That homophobic death cult is as much to blame for the institutionalization of child abuse as anyone in Hollywood.

by Anonymousreply 302May 23, 2016 5:20 AM

R302 = humorless

by Anonymousreply 303May 23, 2016 5:21 AM

[quote] I have always mistrusted George Lucas.

Me too, but that has more to do with him a shitty and mercurial director and because of the disastrous effect the deification of [italic]Star Wars[/italic] has had on American pop culture.

by Anonymousreply 304May 23, 2016 5:22 AM

[quote] What about Lukas. Haas, did his parents watch over him?

Not as closely as your husband. Why else would you discourage pedophilia from being reported?

by Anonymousreply 305May 23, 2016 5:24 AM

Arthur C. Clarke, 80, widely regarded as a visionary and author of the celebrated 2001: A Space Odyssey and some 80 other books, was quoted as saying in the interview published in London's Sunday Mirror that having sex with children was all right.

'Once they have reached the age of puberty, it is OK... It doesn't do any harm,' said Clarke, who has lived in Sri Lanka for 40 years.

"I am trying to think of the youngest boy I have ever had because, of course, you can't tell it here. I think most of the damage comes from the fuss made by hysterical parents afterwards. If the kids don't mind, fair enough,' he was reported to have said in the interview which was conducted at his house.

by Anonymousreply 306May 23, 2016 5:31 AM

Done fingering yourself yet, r306?

by Anonymousreply 307May 23, 2016 5:33 AM

The sci-fi and fantasy worlds are full of pedos. Hell, they've found [italic]Star Trek[/italic] memorabilia in the house of practically every pedo that's gotten caught. I'm not sure Gene Roddenberry was a pedo, but he was a sleazebag nonetheless; he claimed to be a feminist as an excuse to score more pussy from liberal women, and he wrote doggerel lyrics to the show's theme song to screw Alexander Courage out of half the royalties.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 308May 23, 2016 5:37 AM

R307 - R306 was quoting an interview. R306 Where did you get the quote?

by Anonymousreply 309May 23, 2016 5:37 AM

Did you cum yet r309?

by Anonymousreply 310May 23, 2016 5:39 AM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 311May 23, 2016 5:42 AM

Beat the meat r311

by Anonymousreply 312May 23, 2016 5:44 AM

R305, I never once said pedophiles should not be reported. I did say the cops did not arrest Woody Allen, so they must have doubted his daughter.

by Anonymousreply 313May 23, 2016 5:57 AM

We either have a troll or a pedophile @ R307 R310 and R312. I wonder if DL admins can track this sicko.

by Anonymousreply 314May 23, 2016 5:58 AM

A friend went to high school with Macauley Culkin and was friends with him..she told me he was definitely raped during Home Alone filming by a grip.

by Anonymousreply 315May 23, 2016 6:00 AM

R313, if you must have a say, why not look into the case yourself. It's all there, in black and white. It's all about power and money.

by Anonymousreply 316May 23, 2016 6:01 AM

I did read about it but even though Woody acted rather strangely towards his daughter, Ma knew he was see a head doctor for his weirdness, apparently Mia thought he was ok to see her. Apparently there was no proof and the police decided they did not have a case. I have a feeling it was close but no cigar.

by Anonymousreply 317May 23, 2016 6:08 AM

You've already been reported r314. You and your companions have quite the flair for pedophilic slash. Because that's all this is to you, slash, of a pedophilic nature. And unlike Elijah Woods, I'm not shy about reporting it.

When you see flashing lights in your bedroom window you'll know why

by Anonymousreply 318May 23, 2016 6:11 AM

So the usual suspects, the guy who made Newsies and High School Musical, Joel Schumacher, and whom ever worked with Drew Barrymore, her mother never watched her.

by Anonymousreply 319May 23, 2016 6:13 AM

Any man who uses the word 'slash' without irony is suspect.

by Anonymousreply 320May 23, 2016 6:18 AM

Since R319 mentioned that Schumacher fellow, it made me think: WEHT the two kids from [italic]The Incredible Shrinking Woman[/italic]?

by Anonymousreply 321May 23, 2016 6:20 AM

Anyone who gets off on this slash for as many hours as you have is probably criminal. But I've left that designation to law enforcement.

by Anonymousreply 322May 23, 2016 6:22 AM

Elijah profits.

by Anonymousreply 323May 23, 2016 6:25 AM

The anti-DL brigade trying to derail another thread. Ignore.

by Anonymousreply 324May 23, 2016 6:30 AM

These underground networks have friends in high places through bribery, placing them in those powerful positions themselves, being members of that underground network, working together because it mutually benefitial, etc.

You really think such a network can be brought down by well meaning outsiders? Like every "club" (Satanic, pedophile, etc.) your initiation involves committing a crime so heinous that without the "club"'s protection you are finished when it comes out. That will bind you to the club forever. The leaders of that "club" will always have control over you (so you better think twice if you want to break the rules or question the "club" leaders' authority and try to bring them down so you can be on top) and if you step out of line you are on your own and that's when you find your dirty laundry all over the media and the internet and if you threaten to reveal all your secrets you find yourself dead of an overdose or tragic car accident.

These "clubs" work on the premise that by joining them you are better than the stupid masses. A superior being who can get away with anything and that includes rape of children and murder (why would that be bad? that's what you do with cattle, that's what inferior beings are for!). Depending on the "club" there is also a faux enlightenment spiritual philosophy attached that examplifies the belief to be better and more special than the rest of the world. By joining these "clubs" you get access to all kinds of business opportunites, because members help and support each other (like a fraternity). When you are considered useful in any kind of way (rich, interesting entrepreneur, promising student, etc.) you will get approached and find yourself manipulated into believing that the only way you can achieve your higher goals is by joining that "club". Non-club members will be brought down if they get too powerful in order to prevent them to become a viable alternative to the "club's" monopoly type of power reach.

This is just a new phase of enlightenment where the masses know their place and accept that these guys are too powerful to be brought down by offical means like police force or the law. And if the masses try to stage some kind of revolution that's when the masses get hit with the bad stuff like shortage of water supply, pandemic diseases. These guys don't kid around (no pun intended).

by Anonymousreply 325May 23, 2016 6:33 AM

Arthur C Clarke's Knighthood award was delayed (at his own request) until the authorities cleared him of accusations in 'The Sunday Mirror.'

Notable that Stephen Fry is as yet without honours, despite omnipresence, good works, and friendship with Prince Charles. Hugh Laurie has the OBE.

by Anonymousreply 326May 23, 2016 6:34 AM

R318 WTF? Did you mistype my reply no. or are you trolling? Never mind, you must be the pervert I reported. As you were.

by Anonymousreply 327May 23, 2016 6:35 AM

Fry is a loose cannon. That's why people with pedophile connections keep their distance from him in public.

by Anonymousreply 328May 23, 2016 6:37 AM

I'll be on DL tomorrow, r327, and you'll be, wherever. They'll probably confiscate your phone. We can talk again when you make bail, you sick freak.

by Anonymousreply 329May 23, 2016 6:41 AM

Is Duh-vida on this thread?

by Anonymousreply 330May 23, 2016 6:50 AM

Well, I hope she's R329 or else we have us another psycho. Or maybe it's Steven Spielberg himself or one of his minions. Nothing would surprise me.

by Anonymousreply 331May 23, 2016 7:09 AM

r16 what married guy, your link doesn't work

by Anonymousreply 332May 23, 2016 7:11 AM

R286, Your gross generalizations about straight females reading and posting on this thread are extremely offensive. Here's one of a series of well-done videos by British Louis Theroux, this time exploring how pedos now in recovery think and if they will ever admit full responsibility for their very serious crimes.

I've tried to help rape victims where the attacker was not a stranger. In LA County it's extremely tough if the victim doesn't end up in the emergency ward, doesn't have parents and family members that will assist, and won't agree to leave the state afterwards. I'm just being realistic. I wish there was a solution, especially for young kids. Still at the very least I would urge any victim to call a rape hotline as it's still anonymous.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 333May 23, 2016 7:53 AM

Looks like they've been helping themselves to a bit of the candy they use to lure kids in.

by Anonymousreply 334May 23, 2016 8:17 AM

I think R286 and R333 are the same person. Could someone check that out? I don't think we have that function anymore. I could be wrong, but the language is similar. I don't want to say who I think it is and I definitely don't want to say her name thrice. This is a serious topic about a very serious criminal faction in Hollywood that's been going on for ages. I've been watching this thread perchance that others in the business may chirp up who've been molested by these people on a forum where they'll feel they're free to speak.

Stop derailing.

by Anonymousreply 335May 23, 2016 8:25 AM

R335, Well you are way, way off base. I am definitely NOT R286. I was EXTREMELY insulted and said so at that post. IF you even bothered to read the 1st line of my post at R333 I said that the poster at R286 had NO business falsely accusing ALL of the straight females on this thread when he does NOT even know our identities. He reminds me of the severely mentally ill troll who accuses every single poster with whom he disagrees a juvenile name I will not again mention at this time.

Please tell me what is your problem?? Good night.

by Anonymousreply 336May 23, 2016 8:44 AM

Epstein was a member of the Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations although I don't think he graduated college. He funnels staggering sums into Artificial Intelligence and eugenics related projects, still.

The dots are all out there.

People should not be naive about what happens when reporting. It rarely goes well for adults, never mind anyone else.

by Anonymousreply 337May 23, 2016 12:27 PM

Link @ R337

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 338May 23, 2016 12:28 PM

WOW. Holy fuck. Everybody knows, but that such a recognisable name has the courage to speak out... Wow. Good on him.

by Anonymousreply 339May 23, 2016 12:29 PM

Thread REEKS of Duh-vida now.

by Anonymousreply 340May 23, 2016 12:32 PM

Macaulay Culkin, Edward Furlong, Justin Bieber, Brad Renfro... Sure. Miley Cyrus, however, is protected by her family. Don't know about Harry Styles.

by Anonymousreply 341May 23, 2016 12:34 PM

Actually, it's not the names of the victims we're interested in, it's the names of the perpetrators. Not about paedophilia, but there's a very interesting Columbo episode called Murder, Smoke and Shadows (season 8, episode 2). Try not to think of SS while watching it.

by Anonymousreply 342May 23, 2016 12:37 PM

Protection of the Teri Shields variety?

Age 15

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 343May 23, 2016 12:39 PM

Zero proof, but from their body of work alone, SS, Cameron, Kubrick would all make a whole lot of sense. Sadly, Katzenberg also.

by Anonymousreply 344May 23, 2016 12:43 PM

Forgot his name, but there's also the youngest from Family Ties. And Justine Bateman doesn't seem to be doing fine, at all. Even her brother only seems to have conquered all that, at unimaginable cost. But he doesn't look free from any of that, at all.

And why the hell did Michael J Fox get such an illness at such a young age??? But that's probably yet another issue.

by Anonymousreply 345May 23, 2016 12:46 PM

Christopher Pettiet, of course. DiCaprio only survived because he was less attractive at the time.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 346May 23, 2016 12:48 PM

So many points of connection...btw, might be easier to list those not involved?

Epstein has many friends in entertainment industry, some mentioned on this page. But you knew that, right?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 347May 23, 2016 12:50 PM

Diff'rent Strokes even got so cynical as to make an ANTI-PEDO episode, the fuckers. The look on Dana Plato's face in most scenes... She seems like she LOATHES some of the other actors, and in particular the one who plays her father.

It doesn't help that many of these people produced entertainment that was hugely successful.

by Anonymousreply 348May 23, 2016 12:51 PM

Who did SS abuse? The only dirt I have on him is that he was fooling around on Mrs SS with Daphne Zuniga.

by Anonymousreply 349May 23, 2016 12:52 PM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 350May 23, 2016 12:54 PM

R133, absolutely believe what you posted about Madeleine McCann, for any number of reasons. It's disgusting is what it is. These people are soulless.

by Anonymousreply 351May 23, 2016 12:54 PM

Thank you for the post on JonBenet Ramsey. Little Miss Sunshine, indeed.

by Anonymousreply 352May 23, 2016 12:56 PM

Yep, R351.

You knew they know each other, right?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 353May 23, 2016 12:57 PM

There's one reason Sarah Ferguson is hated.

by Anonymousreply 354May 23, 2016 12:58 PM

Interesting crowd at the Polanski screening...some names just come up over and over.

Films sets provide a lot of power, control and isolation, don't they? Kids often are taken out of school if in a movie or show, socially isolated. Seems a good set up for those who get off on dehumanization and abuse of power...

Fergie was a patsy, all elites are compromised and controlled, levers may vary.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 355May 23, 2016 1:03 PM

Schizophrenia as a coping mechanism following childhood trauma. This makes a hell of a lot of sense.

by Anonymousreply 356May 23, 2016 1:04 PM

Pete Townshend knew about the pedo ring and was collecting data to stop abuse. Cliff Richard was fucking both men and boys at those UK pedo ring parties. His whole Christian act is just that, an act. He likes sex with both man and young boys. He probably has some kind of tie to Jill Dando's death.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 357May 23, 2016 1:06 PM

It's not just one guy, it's dozens of them. All with director of producer credit, this is not some low-tier second AD. SS and Rob Reiner make a hell of a lot of sense.

Sadly, their tastes are what shaped Hollywood all through the late 80s and 90s.

by Anonymousreply 358May 23, 2016 1:07 PM

What about P Diddy? Or Usher??

by Anonymousreply 359May 23, 2016 1:10 PM

So Jake Lloyd is going the same road Brian Bonsall did before him. That is a disgrace for the producers who made millions off their backs, when they were not even 10 years old. A disgrace.

by Anonymousreply 360May 23, 2016 1:11 PM

Rob Reiner seems like a big time pedo. Who did he abuse on the Stand By Me set?

by Anonymousreply 361May 23, 2016 1:17 PM

Mario Testino could be another. The guy oozes... wouldn't want to meet him. Would probably quit my job before I had to work with him.

by Anonymousreply 362May 23, 2016 1:17 PM

Exactly what R325 posted. That is the reason why unless they get sloppy, they will never get caught. Or... People start talking. Elijah did a great thing here. He's right not to name names, it would be suicide and he's not ready to do that. But this attitude, showing you're not afraid, he's right about that.

by Anonymousreply 363May 23, 2016 1:20 PM

Great post by R325. It's all in there.

by Anonymousreply 364May 23, 2016 1:23 PM

Does the rest of DL really believe this thread solves the mysteries of what really happened to Madeline and Jon Benet? So that means the McCanns really are innocent?

by Anonymousreply 365May 23, 2016 1:25 PM

No the McCanns are not innocent.

by Anonymousreply 366May 23, 2016 1:32 PM

R342 here. So the Columbo episode (S8E2) could be about the infamous Twilight Zone where Vic Morrow and two children were beheaded. From the Hook article linked earlier:

Although the "negligent" participants got off with nary a knuckle-rap, we must not forget that Spielberg also produced the actual snuff film "Twilight Zone," in which Vic Morrow and two young children were beheaded during filming.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 367May 23, 2016 1:36 PM

Chelsea Handler is a name that comes as no surprise (as an alibi provider, whatever).

by Anonymousreply 368May 23, 2016 1:41 PM

Chelsea???? Since when??

by Anonymousreply 369May 23, 2016 1:50 PM

The "official means" are often that in name only, R225. Great post.

I've always wondered if all of the info that came out about Epstein was more about control and compromise of others? Or perhaps making potentially damaging info "old news?"

That the eugenics crowd overlaps with the prey on vulnerable young humans crowd comes as no surprise. Scientists, politicians, royalty and young teens all cavorting in Carribean, my fav was hypocrit Tipper, who attended with Al. Info on boys has sure been suppressed, huh?

by Anonymousreply 370May 23, 2016 1:58 PM

If they were not compromised you would never have heard of them.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 371May 23, 2016 2:05 PM

What happens when people do try to act, what R325 said.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 372May 23, 2016 2:09 PM

[quote] Diff'rent Strokes even got so cynical as to make an ANTI-PEDO episode, the fuckers. The look on Dana Plato's face in most scenes... She seems like she LOATHES some of the other actors, and in particular the one who plays her father.

At the end, Willis assumes Mr. Horton from the bicycle shop was gay because he went after boys, but the cop corrects him and points out the difference between pedophilia and homosexuality. That was a big deal in 1983 when lots of the general public probably still believed the two were one and the same. By contrast, [italic]Kojak[/italic] did an episode about a pedo a few years earlier that made no such distinction.

Todd Bridges was molested by his manager, who was also black, before DS began; he even talks about it in his book. It's all about power; it's bigger than race, religion, sexual orientation, or any of the things that divide us. They use that power and hold that over the innocent and naïve. And I'm honestly surprised the number Elijah Wood said there were is lower than it is.

As for Dana Plato, she was probably high on something during the taping. People tried as hard as they could to help her to get her life back together; even Johnny Whittaker tried to intervene, thinking that if he couldn't save Anissa Jones he could at least try to save her. But the fact is you cannot help someone who does not want to be helped. What makes her death all the more sadly ironic is that the drugs that actually caused her death were legal ones.

by Anonymousreply 373May 23, 2016 2:14 PM

DC no different than NY dinner parties for Epstein, add politicians to mix of media, finance, those who supply. Nor is London, or even Nebrasa or State College, PA.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 374May 23, 2016 2:17 PM

[quote]Sadly, Katzenberg also.

Just for the sake of argument, what would happen if someone high up at Disney was implicated and actually prosecuted? I bet their stock value would plummet to practically nothing, and you'd likely see a fan revolt on an unprecedented scale. They'd even burn Mickey Mouse in effigy right in the middle of Main Street USA.

by Anonymousreply 375May 23, 2016 2:30 PM

That would never be allowed to happen, R375.

Cases are steered from start to finish.

by Anonymousreply 376May 23, 2016 2:42 PM

The Britney Spears photo shoot from 1995 is disturbing!!! I am around the same age as Britney and I remember how sick it was when her first album was released and all the media could discuss was her virginity, breasts, etc She also had a striking resemblance to Bridgette Andersen. Was there any link between the two? Young Drew Barrymore also had a similar look. I believe she and Bridgette were both auditioned for the role in E.T.

by Anonymousreply 377May 23, 2016 2:42 PM

Virginity and breasts seemed to be a common discussion when it came to pop stars

by Anonymousreply 378May 23, 2016 2:44 PM

Bridgette was in [italic]Savannah Smiles[/italic] the same time Drew was in [italic]E.T.[/italic], and then after that she did a short-lived TV show for Disney called [italic]Gun Shy[/italic] (a TV version of [italic]The Apple Dumpling Gang[/italic] where literally the entire original film cast had other commitments) before playing Rose's granddaughter on [italic]The Golden Girls[/italic], then played Tom Skerritt's daughter in [italic]Parent Trap II[/italic]. So she had gone through the Disney machine long before Britney ever got anywhere near it.

Nickelodeon and Disney taped a lot of their shows in Orlando in the 1990s, and it seems like those were where a lot of the biggest fuck-ups came from. But of course, let us not forget what became of the original Disney child star: Bobby Driscoll. Someone tried to make a documentary about his life and premature death, but the Kickstarter site they set up didn't come close to raising the amount of money they needed so it was abandoned.

by Anonymousreply 379May 23, 2016 3:00 PM

Isn't the Britney Spears photoshoot also brought up in connection with MK Ultra? That Hollywood hypnosis project where child stars are being brainwashed to be sex slaves who know nothing about the sexual attacks afterward, but sometimes they have side effects like in the case of Britney going berserk, shaving her head, and attacking paps with umbrellas?

by Anonymousreply 380May 23, 2016 3:19 PM

Was Perleman the guy who made young talent have sex with each other while he watched, or was that someone else?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 381May 23, 2016 3:21 PM

An interesting and important topic taken off the rails by a bunch of nonsensical loons. Classic DL.

by Anonymousreply 382May 23, 2016 3:32 PM

"a bunch of nonsensical loons"

isn't that DL in a nutshell?

by Anonymousreply 383May 23, 2016 3:33 PM

[quote]Chelsea Handler is a name that comes as no surprise (as an alibi provider, whatever).

She probably gets paid off through getting her projects greenlit like the Netflix documentaries and the talk show. She is a fucking snake that she wouldn't care about providing false alibis.

On a related note, I've wondered about some of the adult actors who have worked on Dan Schneider's shows, they have to know things and maybe they are being paid off.

by Anonymousreply 384May 23, 2016 3:40 PM

The Crispin Glover text is terrific. It's even better than the first time I read it.

by Anonymousreply 385May 23, 2016 3:40 PM

Amanda Peterson was raped when she was 15. Of course, they don't say who did it, but that was the age she was when she was shooting [italic]Can't Buy Me Love[/italic], so you do the math.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 386May 23, 2016 3:43 PM

Crispin Glover's attack piece is very provocative. No doubt fueled by the Back To The Future fiasco. Perhaps Spielberg shared some of Michael Jackson's values. Then when the heat was on him....he stopped being MJ's friend.

by Anonymousreply 387May 23, 2016 4:06 PM

Crispin Glover's essay is not only good because of what it hints in regards to pedophilia but also what it says about the mawkish culture spun the Spielbergs of our world

by Anonymousreply 388May 23, 2016 4:09 PM

R350 and R351 The Ramsey and McCann cases are eerily similar.

If you read the secretive, un-prosecuted indictments of the Ramsey parents while imagining a pedo ring involvement it makes perfect sense. [the indictment also unknowingly supported the testimony of Nancy Krebs, which came about 18 months later. Nancy had first hand knowledge of a multi-generational pedo ring which involved not only John Ramsey but her mother's godfather and his son Fleet White. Fleet White's father, Nancy's mother's godfather, moved in rarefied circles that included at least one well-known female celeb who was possibly also a victim of the 'cult']

Two counts of the Ramsey indictments. Unlike the claims of the headlines, the indictments did NOT accuse the Ramseys of 'child abuse leading to death' but accused them of PERMITTING their child to be abused, which resulted in her death:

Count four of the indictment said the Ramseys “did unlawfully, knowingly, recklessly and feloniously permit a child to be unreasonably placed in a situation which posed a threat of injury to the child’s life or health, which resulted in the death of JonBenét Ramsey, a child under the age of sixteen.”

Count 7 of the indictment accuses the parents of covering up for the murderer of their child: Count seven of the indictment said the Ramseys did “unlawfully, knowingly and feloniously render assistance to a person, with intent to hinder, delay and prevent the discovery, detention, apprehension, prosecution, conviction and punishment of such person for the commission of a crime, knowing the person being assisted has committed and was suspected of the crime of murder in the first degree and child abuse resulting in death.”

Count 7 especially makes it clear that the 'child abuse resulting in death' was connected to the evidence of 'chronic sexual abuse' that was testified to by several experts. Personally, in my opinion, I believe these indictements could transfer over to the McCanns without changing a jot.

People tend to forget these 'rings' aren't just about a group of perverts having their jollies. These people are all about producing and sustaining massive profits--BILLIONS on CP per year, not to mention trafficking and prostitution-- and the power and control to be had through blackmail of key individuals. These rings may or may not contain elements of ritualized Satanism---more often than not ritualistic elements are introduced for 2 reasons: 1. to traumatize and frighten the victims making them more compliant and 2. introduce a discrediting 'poison pill' into the proceedings so that victims are not believed should they come forward. Given the current climate of disdain for 'satanic panic' it's the perfect discrediting device. Of course, in some 'circles', the satanism is probably perfectly sincere.

by Anonymousreply 389May 23, 2016 4:58 PM

Sorry, my post above was meant to address R351 and R352.

by Anonymousreply 390May 23, 2016 4:59 PM

R388: thank you for that brilliant adjective, 'Mawkish'. That sums up his work succinctly in one word.

by Anonymousreply 391May 23, 2016 5:00 PM

Mr Crispin Glover still has great hair:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 392May 23, 2016 5:13 PM

“Clearly something major was going on in Hollywood. It was all organised”.

“There are a lot of vipers in this industry, people who only have their own interests in mind,” he added. “There is a darkness in the underbelly – if you can imagine it, it’s probably happened.”

by Anonymousreply 393May 23, 2016 5:26 PM

I don't doubt that there's many abusers in positions of power in the entertainment industry, but I'm sorry, these claims of organized abuse (not organized cover-ups) just reek of blood libel under a different name.

by Anonymousreply 394May 23, 2016 5:33 PM

If the shoe fits, wear it, R394.

by Anonymousreply 395May 23, 2016 5:34 PM

You nutters are slipping. I'm still waiting for someone to apply numerology to this topic. I'm sure 13 is a magical number among pedos somehow.

by Anonymousreply 396May 23, 2016 5:36 PM

You pedo apologists are slipping. Go ahead and accuse us of claiming aliens in UFOs are to blame. I know you're just dying to.

by Anonymousreply 397May 23, 2016 5:42 PM

R231 like many other people. What's your point? (I doubt EW was sexually abused by his father)

However, have you had a look at EW? He looks slightly campy and he is an actor, for crying out loud. Conservative, 'macho' het men would have an issue with having a son that does not seem to follow/cannot be bothered about traditional 'masculinity'. My guess is that's where the resentment comes from.

by Anonymousreply 398May 23, 2016 5:59 PM

When I was a teen in the 90s, to like or not to like Spielberg's films was almost a political statement. It said a lot about character.

by Anonymousreply 399May 23, 2016 6:00 PM

Elijah Wood is not the issue here, stop derailing.

by Anonymousreply 400May 23, 2016 6:01 PM

R99, wasn't it "OK" to like Jaws, Close Encounters and Indiana Jones, but not The Color Purple and his other "serious" movies?

by Anonymousreply 401May 23, 2016 6:13 PM

Crispin Glover on Letterman.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 402May 23, 2016 6:13 PM

If you liked his "serious" movies you were a complete tool, but not liking the other movies either was a political statement, that you were definitely anti-capitalist, etc. I grew up in Europe, so those who did not like Spielberg usually supported European auteur cinema, or the American outsiders like David Lynch, Gus Van Sant...

by Anonymousreply 403May 23, 2016 6:15 PM

R399, sorry.

by Anonymousreply 404May 23, 2016 6:17 PM

I imagine some Europeans disliked [italic]Schindler's List[/italic] for the same reasons hunters took umbrage with [italic]Bambi[/italic].

by Anonymousreply 405May 23, 2016 6:18 PM

R399, it said a lot about how juveniles judge character.

by Anonymousreply 406May 23, 2016 6:21 PM

R257 because it's Reddit and the censor a lot of things.

by Anonymousreply 407May 23, 2016 6:28 PM

R398 You're off base. R306 R311 No. Remorse. whatsoever. Beyond creepy. Good Elijah is addressing the obvious, he's been in the industry long enough to know, yet is indie enough to take any backlash.

by Anonymousreply 408May 23, 2016 6:31 PM

R326 Arthur C Clarke never sued the Sunday Mirror. If there was no truth to it he had a great case for winning but he didn't do it. But the rumours of Clarke being a pedo existed way before that interview.

by Anonymousreply 409May 23, 2016 6:42 PM

SS made high-grade popcorn, 'Close Encounters', 'Jaws' and 'Raiders' being among his populist peaks. Popcorn doesn't really endure though, as SS knows. Maybe 'Schindler' and 'Lincoln' will have legs, it'll be interesting to see them again sometime.

SS ruined 'AI' though, and only underlined the difference between a gifted journeyman and a genius. (In addition 'Schindler' deterred Kubrick from pursuing 'Wartime Lies', for which he'd undertaken his usual exhaustive preparation.)

Kubrick might have envied his friend SS's popcorn success, but his films are infinitely more intriguing and re-watchable. This thread might make one now take more note of SS, but not in the way he'd like.

by Anonymousreply 410May 23, 2016 6:48 PM

I find it interesting how many actors Sielberg discovered when they were young boys. The new Han Solo is the latest.

by Anonymousreply 411May 23, 2016 6:50 PM

A bit of numerology for you apologists to chew over.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 412May 23, 2016 6:53 PM

Whenever I'm in the mood for some Hollywood conspiracy theories, Chinese Zodiac is the most helpful way to connect the dots.

by Anonymousreply 413May 23, 2016 7:02 PM

Meet the New Han Solo: Alden Ehrenreich, Discovered by Steven Spielberg at a Bat Mitzvah

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 414May 23, 2016 7:06 PM

David Geffen was an early investor in D.E.N., hanging around with Collins Piper and Bryan Singer and Michael Huffington (Ariana's then-husband).

"DreamWorks began in 1994 as an attempt by media moguls Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen (together, SKG) to create a new Hollywood studio"

by Anonymousreply 415May 23, 2016 7:08 PM

Dreamworks' logo

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 416May 23, 2016 7:11 PM

Michael Jackson reportedly was angry with the DreamWorks logo, saying they copied his Neverland Valley Ranch logo

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 417May 23, 2016 7:16 PM

R412, that was the most unintentionally hilarious thing I've seen in a while. "In War Babies, pipsqueak Shirley played the diaper-clad harlot Gloria..."

Or was it intentionally hilarious? Seriously, projecting harlotry on a 3 year old? Is the narrator one of those crazy evangelicals who blames little girls for enticing men into molest them?

by Anonymousreply 418May 23, 2016 7:18 PM

R410, popcorn absolutely endures! Jaws is still a great film 40 (!) years later.

by Anonymousreply 419May 23, 2016 7:21 PM

OMG R417, the Neverland logo is creepy as hell. That is a sexualized kid if I ever saw one.

by Anonymousreply 420May 23, 2016 8:34 PM

Yes, when I see a child holding a fishing rod, I just want to fuck it.

And why the moon? Ever notice that Neil A spelled backwards is ALIEN?!

by Anonymousreply 421May 23, 2016 8:39 PM

A few years ago, Huffington had a 20-something boyfriend in NYC. Paid for the apartment, tuition, the works.

by Anonymousreply 422May 23, 2016 8:49 PM

20-something boyfriend? How unnatural. Clearly a pedo.

by Anonymousreply 423May 23, 2016 8:50 PM

A pedophile ring? Is that what a fella gives to his underage beau?

by Anonymousreply 424May 23, 2016 8:52 PM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 425May 23, 2016 9:34 PM

People who think what has happened and what is happening is not real should burn in hell (and I'm not even religious - but I had no way of putting it)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 426May 23, 2016 9:51 PM

Why did Frankie Muniz have 2 strokes before he was even 30? Why did Michael J Fox get Parkinson's around the same age? Why did Brian Bonsall and Jake Lloyd go off the rails, just to name two very young children who were exploited as "actors"?

And now this

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 427May 23, 2016 9:52 PM

Pedophilia causes Parkinsons? Or was Fox injected with Parkinsons because he knew too much?!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 428May 23, 2016 10:03 PM

STFU, R428. What kind of lifestyle leads to getting such serious, life-threatening life health issues, at such a young age. It's not just the paedophilia, it's a whole lifestyle that they're exposed to, and that's not helping any. Do you think doing hard drugs in your teens is not gonna fuck up your system?

by Anonymousreply 429May 23, 2016 10:10 PM

R429, are you really this nuts or are you deliberately trolling? It's kind of shitty to troll a thread about pedophilia. I mean, it's a pretty serious problem that's hard to get people to take seriously enough, but here you are making it seem like it's just a weird obsession by freaks on the internet. Not cool.

by Anonymousreply 430May 23, 2016 10:18 PM

What are you even talking about R430? What I am saying is those sets with kids working JOBS in the entertainment business are rampant with pedophilia + other stuff (drugs). And none of it will make their lives any better.

Now if you think a young man not yet 30 can have a stroke or an old man's disease "just because", be my guest. Health issues usually have their causes. In this case, I would say drugs, possibly other stuff too. The conversation can stick to pedophilia if this annoys other posters, the aim here is not to troll.

by Anonymousreply 431May 23, 2016 10:28 PM

Strokes among younger people are on the rise, and the biggest risk factors include family history, smoking and obesity. Nothing remotely unique to the entertainment industry or having anything to do with "pedophilia + other stuff." But you keep peddling your irrational and irresponsible theories. It's way more entertaining than annoying.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 432May 23, 2016 10:41 PM

Strokes can come from self medication with illicit drugs. Why self medicate? Well, you have trouble dealing with a trauma from your past and, for whatever reason, not willing to seek professional help.

by Anonymousreply 433May 23, 2016 10:45 PM

r432, thanks for bringing some common sense to this thread!

by Anonymousreply 434May 23, 2016 11:56 PM

r434 I think both r432 and r433 are right. Cocaine is known to affect the heart, and the effects on kids could be worse/different than on adults. That doesn't include all the designer drugs that are made with dangerous chemicals and cut with unknown ingredients.

Drugs used as performance enhancers are also known to cause heart attacks/stroke. Actors could be on those for any number of reasons, especially since many are expected to have a certain body type for roles.

by Anonymousreply 435May 24, 2016 12:03 AM

A lot of straights still equate (male) homosexuality with pedophilia. Especially straight men. When Justin Bieber was still underage and at the peak of his fame, straight guys would often ask me (quasi jokingly) if I was attracted to him. If the abuse comes out, the backlash against gay men could be huge (not saying that it shouldn't come out of course).

by Anonymousreply 436May 24, 2016 12:28 AM

corey from boy meets world was moleasted along with his brother.

by Anonymousreply 437May 24, 2016 12:29 AM



by Anonymousreply 438May 24, 2016 12:30 AM

Just because I pre-lubed before going to a Brian Singer pool party does NOT mean I want to be passed around to producers.

by Anonymousreply 439May 24, 2016 12:42 AM

"A lot of straights still equate (male) homosexuality with pedophilia. Especially straight men."

Blame that Open Secret doc for focusing on men who molest boys and ignoring the MANY men who molest girls.

by Anonymousreply 440May 24, 2016 12:53 AM

In Hollywood, for whatever reason, the sexual abuse of boys is apparently MUCH more common than sexual abuse of girls... make of that what you will.

by Anonymousreply 441May 24, 2016 12:58 AM

r441, says who?

Look at Polanski, Errol Flynn, Charlie Chaplin, Dan Schneider....

by Anonymousreply 442May 24, 2016 1:00 AM

And Jerry Seinfeld dated a 17-year-old girl.

by Anonymousreply 443May 24, 2016 1:02 AM

[quote] In Hollywood, for whatever reason, the sexual abuse of boys is apparently MUCH more common than sexual abuse of girls...

Tell that to Bill Cosby.

by Anonymousreply 444May 24, 2016 1:03 AM

"In Hollywood, for whatever reason, the sexual abuse of boys is apparently MUCH more common than sexual abuse of girls... make of that what you will. "

Don't think it is. It's just considered more "normal" when men abuse little girls.

by Anonymousreply 445May 24, 2016 1:05 AM

R440 This insightful British made doc also focuses on little girls who are abused rather than on boys until the very end. That's where the film is to me most horrific. Recommend seeing the whole movie for it's portrayal of a man who can't understand why his prey aren't enjoying his "activities" and that they're so very wrong. He's part of the "Wonderland Club."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 446May 24, 2016 1:06 AM

r445, I agree with you. When a grown man is with a teenage girl, people see it as a "romance" but when a grown man is with a teen boy people think the boy must have been forced against his will

by Anonymousreply 447May 24, 2016 1:09 AM

One of the mothers involved with that "An Open Secret" documentary had several sons and a daughter in acting, and she said the boys were targeted much more often than the girl. I guess that's just one person's experience, but still.

There *are* such things as gay and straight pedophiles, by the way, otherwise all the DEN assholes would have been plying girls with alcohol and pills too and not just young pretty boys.

Seriously, I don't know why this is such a difficult/offensive concept for some people to accept; If a grown man only targets young girls, he's STRAIGHT, and if he only targets young boys, he's GAY... DUH!

by Anonymousreply 448May 24, 2016 1:12 AM

r448, most guys who pursue older teen boys (like 15-17) do tend to be gay or bi, but ones who pursue elementary school age (or younger) kids often cannot be easily categorized as gay or straight since many of them are not attracted to adults. Also, predators who target younger kids often molest both boys and girls.

by Anonymousreply 449May 24, 2016 1:20 AM

R53 "Statuary Rape"?!? OUCH!

by Anonymousreply 450May 24, 2016 1:29 AM

Elijah takes it all back, words out of context He said : "The Sunday Times interviewed me about my latest film but the story became about something else entirely. It prompted a number of false and misleading headlines. I had just seen a powerful documentary and I briefly spoke with the reporter about the subject which had consequences I did not intend or expect. Lesson learned. Let me be clear: This subject of child abuse is an important one that should be discussed and properly investigated." The former child star asserts that he has no personal knowledge of a secret child abuse ring in Hollywood. "But as I made absolutely clear to the writer, I have no first-hand experience or observation of the topic, so I cannot speak with any authority beyond articles I have read and films I have seen."

by Anonymousreply 451May 24, 2016 1:56 AM

Anyone in a position to effect change is likely compromised and controlled. Case in point...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 452May 24, 2016 1:58 AM

Lukas Haas had a stroke brought on by cocaine usage when he was in his 20s. Just putting that out there.

by Anonymousreply 453May 24, 2016 1:58 AM

Not Hollywood- but since his overdose death I've always wondered if Glenn Quinn's total self destructiveness (selfconfessed to 'hating being alive' apparently) had more than a little to do with him being sent to a Christian Brothers school in Ireland- those schools were absolutely notorious for endemic abuse of boys from poor Irish families, and he was obviously very fucked up by something

by Anonymousreply 454May 24, 2016 2:09 AM

R451 That was quick

by Anonymousreply 455May 24, 2016 2:11 AM

Most of these powerful pervs are Jewish. Just throwing it out there, because it is true. Jews control Hollywood, after all. Jewish politicians and Israeli politicians are the ones behind the huge pedophile scandal in England, which has been going on for decades. Look it up. All the pervs are the ones shilling for Israel and their deadly agenda. That's blackmail, and that's the big secret behind pedophilia by the Powerful.

Imagine if these pervs were mostly Arab. Fuck me, you queens would be screaming for endless war if that was the case, because the media would be. And who is influenced by the fake media? Most of you, and most of the world. Again, just stating a fact.

But let's admit it: Pointing these facts out will open the floodgates for the 'anti-semite' screamers. Nowadays when you post facts, you piss people off. Everything's offensive, but nothing is more offensive than the truth to these fuckbags. And yes, I mean most of you.

Insider who is on the Outside

by Anonymousreply 456May 24, 2016 2:17 AM

Steven spielberg grosses me out, do you guys think him and wacko tag teamed boys?

by Anonymousreply 457May 24, 2016 2:37 AM

R457 prob

by Anonymousreply 458May 24, 2016 2:44 AM

When did Spielberg and MJ fall out and why? I imagine it must have been around the time MJ dropped out of his Peter Pan project which ultimately became [italic]Hook[/italic].

by Anonymousreply 459May 24, 2016 2:47 AM

Is George Lucas in on it too? Are does he just know a lot of weird people?

by Anonymousreply 460May 24, 2016 2:52 AM

R460: How would all the fanboys who turned on Lucas over the prequels react over something like that?

by Anonymousreply 461May 24, 2016 2:56 AM

[quote]When did Spielberg and MJ fall out and why?

Pop superstar Michael Jackson reportedly paid $150,000 for a "voodoo curse" to kill Hollywood movie maker Steven Spielberg. A new article in American magazine Vanity Fair also claims the Thriller hitmaker wears a prosthetic nose, a wig and bleaches his skin white because he hates being black. The explosive expose, which quotes a number of named and un-named sources, reveals Jackson attended a voodoo ritual in Switzerland in 2000 during which a witch doctor vowed that Spielberg, music mogul David Geffen and 23 other people on the singer's hate list would die. Sources claim former pals Jackson and Spielberg fell out after the director refused to cast him in 1991 Hollywood movie Hook. Vanity Fair claims Jackson underwent a "blood bath" during ceremony - in which 42 cows were sacrificed - before ordering his former business adviser Myung-ho Lee to wire $150,000 to the Mali bank of a voodoo chief called Baba. Reporter Maureen Orth also make potentially damaging revelations concerning child-sex claims involving Jackson.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 462May 24, 2016 3:22 AM

R456: Not only are the key ringmasters in Hollywood pedophilia Jews. But they make sure only Gentiles they can blackmail - preferably, with child sex - ever get into political power via their control of the media. Much of the western world is run by pedo puppets of the Jews.

These Jews then have slaves who would quite literally rather kill themselves than disobey their masters.

And what do they do with that power? Support Israel, of course. This all leads back to that one country. That is why US politics is a 24/7 Israel dicksucking contest.

It's a truth so unbelievable that nobody could come up with it, but it's absolutely true. The Sony email leak showed rabbis and Hollywood producers conspiring to get politicians to support Israel. Antisemites would have rejected that plot as being too cartoonishly antisemitic.

by Anonymousreply 463May 24, 2016 3:24 AM

R463 is more proof goyim are stupid and paranoid and need to be locked away permanently for their safety and ours.

by Anonymousreply 464May 24, 2016 3:28 AM

Your people tried that one before, R464.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 465May 24, 2016 3:29 AM

Goyim molest children all the time. The Bacha Bazi boys of the Middle East are a product of Islamic culture. And as for Christianity, it seems there's always a new priest scandal every now and then. The Vatican has only now raised the age of consent to 18 where it once was 12. That doesn't make Protestants any less rapey; just ask the Duggars.

by Anonymousreply 466May 24, 2016 3:30 AM

All cultures have pedophiles, but only the Jews have industrialized pedophilia and blackmail as an international operation to force Western politicians into serving their shitty little sandbath.

by Anonymousreply 467May 24, 2016 3:32 AM

The movie A.I. was about the pedophile's dream, the 13 year old boy who never ages. What was behind the collaboration on that film?

by Anonymousreply 468May 24, 2016 3:34 AM

R236, So Wood's (recanted) comments are more credible, if he were an openly practicing heterosexual/gay, only has protective sex and HIV-?

What's his quota on STDs and choice of consensual ADULT sex partners, before he's not acting as a shill for PedoPanic 2016?

by Anonymousreply 469May 24, 2016 3:38 AM

Drew Barrymore could talk but she never will. She clearly has borderline personality and is back on mind-altering substances (hawking wine); her age peer, Heather O Rourke died in such a strange manner -- I wonder if her mind/body were in terrible dis-ease from being around some creeper pedo energy.

A lot of these weird filmmakers like SS are aspies/spectrumy and just don't know how to connect with other people...maybe children are easier. It's all awful.

by Anonymousreply 470May 24, 2016 3:42 AM

George H. W. Bush is rumored to be a pedophile.

1991 – President George W. Bush signs Public Law 102-14

Public Law 102-14 asserts that the Seven Noahide Laws are the basis of American civilization, that it is the responsibility of the Nation to transmit these values to future generations, and that at some future date and time the president of the United States with other heads of state will sign an international scroll pledging to return the world to Noahide Law by use of charity and education. The law also commemorates the birth or Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, in celebration of his dedication of returning the world to the Seven Noahide Laws.

PLEASE GOOGLE: “Public Law 102-14 Library of Congress”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 471May 24, 2016 5:27 AM

Not true,R467. The Catholic Church makes the Jews look like pikers when it comes to child trafficking, and covering up child abuse.

by Anonymousreply 472May 24, 2016 5:30 AM

This article states there's over 100 pedos in power in Hollywood.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 473May 24, 2016 6:01 AM

Only about a dozen comments so far on The Hollywood Reporter site.

Harvey Levin of TMZ.com had a very brief article on Wood claiming his denial. The one comment said that Wood would be signing his "Sayonara" from the entertainment world otherwise. Variety had a very similar short article.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 474May 24, 2016 6:06 AM

There are over 527 comments so far on the Guardian article. Of course many will be comparing the Hollywood entertainment industry to the expose in Great Britain and Australia.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 475May 24, 2016 6:08 AM

EW does not really take it back. Look at what he says: "This subject of child abuse is an important one that should be discussed and properly investigated."

And then: "But as I made absolutely clear to the writer, I have no first-hand experience or observation of the topic, so I cannot speak with any authority beyond articles I have read and films I have seen."

That was still very brave what he did, and IMO it's up to the law enforcement authorities to do their job.

by Anonymousreply 476May 24, 2016 6:34 AM

And then there's that South Park episode where SS and GL anally rape... Indiana Jones (but that was over part 4. Still. A powerful image for all to take home).

by Anonymousreply 477May 24, 2016 6:36 AM

R439 wouldn't that be expected of you at a Singer party? I remember someone posted about how they were hired as one as an escort when they were 18 or 19 and living in L.A. and that you basically had to have bareback sex with whoever wanted to have sex with you at one of those parties.

by Anonymousreply 478May 24, 2016 7:36 AM

R470 that's true about Drew that she's using drugs again and relapsed. I feel bad for her but Demi Moore also did this.

by Anonymousreply 479May 24, 2016 7:37 AM

[quote]When did Spielberg and MJ fall out and why? I imagine it must have been around the time MJ dropped out of his Peter Pan project which ultimately became Hook.

I imagine Spielberg and MJ had a falling out over the casting (couch?) process of the child actors and child extras. I can imagine Michael being all giddy about it and Spielberg trying to be a bit professional about it ("don't shit where you eat", that sort of thing).

by Anonymousreply 480May 24, 2016 7:48 AM

I've never seen so many credible sources on a single DL thread. Such reputable websites!

by Anonymousreply 481May 24, 2016 10:40 AM

Jodie is still sucking Mel Gibson's cock and she beats up paps, not to mention she's a drunk.

by Anonymousreply 482May 24, 2016 10:59 AM

I wonder if Mel got into this shit.

by Anonymousreply 483May 24, 2016 12:24 PM

God i hope not

by Anonymousreply 484May 24, 2016 12:30 PM

Roman Catholic sex abuse cases by country

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 485May 24, 2016 12:34 PM

The Catholic Church’s South American shame

Priests accused of sexual abuse in the States are getting a second chance in countries like Colombia and Brazil

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 486May 24, 2016 12:36 PM

Database of accused clergy in Boston Archdiocese

At least 271 clergy — a mix of permanent and visiting priests, pastors, chaplains, deacons, religious order clerics, and nuns — have been publicly accused of child sex abuse in the Boston archdiocese, according to a Globe review.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 487May 24, 2016 12:38 PM

Spotlight: 71 priests accused of sexually abusing children by Baltimore Archdiocese

The Archdiocese of Baltimore has posted a list of all priests accused of sexual abuse of children on its website, as part of the fallout from newspaper investigations portrayed in the Oscar-winning film "Spotlight". The list features 71 clergy members who have been accused of sexual abuse which the church found to be “credible.”

Victims and advocates hope the list will allow others who suffered abuse to come forward.

The list was published in January by Archbishop William Lori, but was not publicized until the Baltimore Sun broke the story this week.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 488May 24, 2016 12:40 PM

Seattle archdiocese posts list of 77 accused of child sex abuse

The Archdiocese of Seattle on Friday published a list of priests, brothers, nuns and deacons accused of sexually assaulting children while serving or living in Western Washington.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 489May 24, 2016 12:42 PM

What the fuck is wrong with you r482?

by Anonymousreply 490May 24, 2016 12:44 PM

‘Payout chart’ for molestation: Secret archive held chilling details of clergy abuse

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 491May 24, 2016 12:45 PM

What kills me is that, even after all of the sordid revelations about Boston, tainted clergy are still going there and being uncoordinated in the diocese. I know of at least two. In fairness, one of them seemed to be cleared in the 1990's. But that was when records were being destroyed, and the cover-up was at its zenith. A private investigator had a different opinion than Church bureaucrats.

by Anonymousreply 492May 24, 2016 12:51 PM

Catholic Church sex abuse scandals around the world

The Catholic Church has faced a raft of allegations of child sex abuse by priests and an inadequate response by bishops. Here is a round-up of some of those events.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 493May 24, 2016 12:55 PM

[post redacted because independent.co.uk thinks that links to their ridiculous rag are a bad thing. Somebody might want to tell them how the internet works. Or not. We don't really care. They do suck though. Our advice is that you should not click on the link and whatever you do, don't read their truly terrible articles.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 494May 24, 2016 1:00 PM

I know Bridgette had been through Disney long before Britney. However I wonder if the same perv(s) may have worked with both because they look so much alike...

by Anonymousreply 495May 24, 2016 1:01 PM

UN has had some issues too, on several continents

by Anonymousreply 496May 24, 2016 1:03 PM

‘Child abuse is a sin’: Files on 36 pedophile priests show how Chicago archdiocese hid sex assault allegations

The Archdiocese of Chicago on Thursday released thousands of internal documents showing how it hid the sexual abuse of children by 36 priests, adding to similar disclosures made earlier this year and fulfilling a pledge by an ailing Cardinal Francis George to release the files before he retires later this month.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 497May 24, 2016 1:03 PM

Look at the Jew spazzing out and plastering the comments with irrelevant shit about Catholics.

We know about the Catholics dude. Looks like you don't want anyone to discuss Hollywood, Pedowood, Israeli Blackmail, AIPAC and the Rabbis.

by Anonymousreply 498May 24, 2016 1:48 PM

This is slightly OT, but something I've always wondered: on gay chatrooms when someone's profile says "into open-minded chat" or "open-mynded"... that's quite likely pedo code, right? Something about that phrase always makes me very suspicious and creeped-out.

by Anonymousreply 499May 24, 2016 1:55 PM

Wood has stated that his comments have been wildly misinterpreted.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 500May 24, 2016 2:01 PM

He shouldn't have opened his mouth if he wasn't prepared to deal with it.

by Anonymousreply 501May 24, 2016 2:03 PM

R500: Which is exactly what he'd say if he were told he'd never work again unless he recanted.

by Anonymousreply 502May 24, 2016 2:03 PM

[quote]Which is exactly what he'd say if he were told he'd never work again unless he recanted.

If you read his actual quotes and compare them to the salacious headlines, you'd agree that his comments have been wildly misinterpreted.

The articles took snippets of quotes out of context to imply something.

by Anonymousreply 503May 24, 2016 2:12 PM

Actors are always getting taken out of context

by Anonymousreply 504May 24, 2016 2:18 PM

Wood is an enabler, like all the child actors. He knows shit, but he has been threatened.

Drew Barrymore? Don't make me puke. She was fucking half of HollyJewWood since she was 10. That is why they gave her a production office/payoff. I'm sorry, but she is not that talented to get a huge studio to back her 'work.' Charlie's Angels. It was a payoff from the Jews that fucked her and drugged her up. She took it, like they all do. I even heard Nicholson, the perviest piece of dogshit in Hollywood, fucked her when she was a child. Wouldn't have been the first time for that scum.

All child actors know. But they will have ruined careers, their dirt in the media, or they would be 'suicided' or die in a one-car accident. Or they overdose her.

Wood knows a lot.

by Anonymousreply 505May 24, 2016 2:25 PM

This thread is getting more fucked up by the second

by Anonymousreply 506May 24, 2016 2:29 PM

The Catholic stuff is just stupid deflection from the current subject : Hollywood

Must be an Hollywood insider doing it

by Anonymousreply 507May 24, 2016 2:36 PM

Or someone who's obsessed

by Anonymousreply 508May 24, 2016 2:44 PM

You're off base, R505. I wouldn't call a child an enabler. The adults who allow this stuff to happen, turn a blind eye... Those are the enablers.

by Anonymousreply 509May 24, 2016 3:11 PM

Half of the anti-pedos here are writing out their most secret and darkest fantasies. Anyone who truly thinks that Drew Barrymore fucked half of Hollywood when she was 10 needs therapy.

by Anonymousreply 510May 24, 2016 3:38 PM

[quote]Half of the anti-pedos here are writing out their most secret and darkest fantasies

As opposed to the pro-pedos?

by Anonymousreply 511May 24, 2016 3:41 PM

"An Open Secret" was directed by Amy Berg. Berg also directed "Deliver Us From Evil", which was about a pedophile Catholic priest who got shuffled around from one place to another, continuing his abuse of children for years and years. She also directed "West of Memphis"... both of these other two documentaries were warmly received by Hollywood, and Berg won many accolades for her "brave" exposes... interestingly though, no one wanted to touch "An Open Secret" with a 10-foot fucking pole. She could barely find a distributor! The only company willing to distribute was one known for conservative and/or religious films.

Hollywood is full of hypocritical scumbags.

Hollywood is full of hypocritical scumbags.

by Anonymousreply 512May 24, 2016 3:43 PM

Oops, don't know how that replication happened, but whatever... it bears repeating.

by Anonymousreply 513May 24, 2016 3:45 PM

[quote]I've never seen so many credible sources on a single DL thread. Such reputable websites!

This poster is implying that the Jewish owned and operated mainstream media is the only reliable source of info in the world. Of course anyone with an ounce of common sense knows that such sources do all they can to protect Jewish malefactors from public exposure.

by Anonymousreply 514May 24, 2016 3:48 PM

Nope, Wood is an adult. And an enabler, like all the other former child stars. Sure, they are fucked in the head like all child abuse victims. But to keep themselves silent equals enabling.

Enablers like all the so-called good guys: SS, Lucas, Katzenberg, etc. All Jews who use these children so they can make more $$$, then they discard the children and enable their abusers. They stay silent. SS is a scumbag, and I hope he dies violently and painfully.

by Anonymousreply 515May 24, 2016 3:54 PM

[quote]But to keep themselves silent equals enabling.

It also equals safety from those who would kill or destroy them if they spoke out. Prior victims are not to blame for the further misdeeds of their abusers.

by Anonymousreply 516May 24, 2016 3:56 PM

The anti-semites on this thread are closet pedos trying to project their own filth onto their chosen target of hatred.

by Anonymousreply 517May 24, 2016 3:59 PM

You dirty, rotten, stinking fucking goyim care more about hurting Jews than keeping children from safety. As has been proven conclusively and irrefutably over and over again, The Catholic Church has plenty to answer for in this regard and they have many hands in the film industry via the mafia.

by Anonymousreply 518May 24, 2016 4:01 PM

lol @ R517 and R518

Fantastical deflection

by Anonymousreply 519May 24, 2016 4:03 PM

[quote]The Catholic Church has plenty to answer for in this regard

And Catholics of all stripes made them answer. Catholics didn't retreat and whine about bigotry.

by Anonymousreply 520May 24, 2016 4:04 PM

Oh, Amy *BERG* is one of the goyim now?

Go fuck yourself R518

by Anonymousreply 521May 24, 2016 4:06 PM

[quote]Catholics didn't retreat and whine about bigotry.

That's because they were too busy perpetuating it and calling it Gawd's will, lousy fucking homophobic anti-semitic papist scum.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 522May 24, 2016 4:06 PM

Shove a Rely tampon in it R521, you Hitler-loving inbred cracker breeder goy piece of shit. If it wasn't for family reunions and VD clinics, you'd never get laid at all.

by Anonymousreply 523May 24, 2016 4:07 PM

well this thread has jumped the shark

by Anonymousreply 524May 24, 2016 4:08 PM

Exactly R498, everyone has known about the Roman Catholic church with priests being ped0s for centuries.

by Anonymousreply 525May 24, 2016 4:09 PM

Goyische family values:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 526May 24, 2016 4:09 PM

slapping sounds, slapping sounds coming from every bathroom in the boardrooms at Disney and nick

by Anonymousreply 527May 24, 2016 4:09 PM

God-fearing Christians:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 528May 24, 2016 4:11 PM

Deflect, deflect, deflect!

by Anonymousreply 529May 24, 2016 4:12 PM

Someone make a new thread about this topic before the Zionist troll fills it up with spam about ped0 priests.

by Anonymousreply 530May 24, 2016 4:15 PM

Look at the dirty fucking goy at R529 reviving every blood libel in the book and feigning an interest in children's safety. I was physically and emotionally abused as a child, too, and every little bit of that abuse came from goyim. You "people" are monsters who deserve every bad thing that happens to you.

by Anonymousreply 531May 24, 2016 4:16 PM

[quote] Someone make a new thread about this topic before the Zionist troll fills it up with spam about ped0 priests.

Maybe the ped-0 priests and imams need to be executed as payback for their death cults' support for Hitler and their ongoing crimes against consenting gay adult relationships.

by Anonymousreply 532May 24, 2016 4:17 PM

What about ped0 rabbis R532?

by Anonymousreply 533May 24, 2016 4:19 PM

What about pedo rabbits?

by Anonymousreply 534May 24, 2016 4:19 PM

My rabbi never molested me, R533. If I'd have been Catholic I can't say the same about priests.

by Anonymousreply 535May 24, 2016 4:20 PM

I don't know when this thread descended into racist anarchy. I think the topic discussed is important enough to not be derailed so here I go:

Did anyone believe EW self-censored himself or received a phone call in such a short period of time? It took him what 24 to 48 hours to issue a denial, isn't that the quickest change of heart ever seen?

I don't believe him when he stated his words were misinterpreted. He's an old hand in the Hollywood game, he must have suspected what would happen.

by Anonymousreply 536May 24, 2016 4:20 PM

Ever notice how so many pedeaux are racist, anti-semitic and homophobic?

by Anonymousreply 537May 24, 2016 4:21 PM

this thread was interesting while it lasted

this is exactly the reason(s) why what's going on in Hollywood will never see the light of day. Anyone who brings up the serious subject will be branded as an anti-semite

by Anonymousreply 538May 24, 2016 4:22 PM

Rabbis do molest, and sexually abuse when they perform genital mutilation on infant boys. Look it up.

by Anonymousreply 539May 24, 2016 4:23 PM

Anyone who isn't a Zionist is a racist, just like anyone who calls Jews white or questions the Jewishness of Ashkenazi Jews.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 540May 24, 2016 4:24 PM

R538 if we ignore them they will go away.

We should carry on talking about EW and his denial, which is was quick and surprising. What could have happened?

by Anonymousreply 541May 24, 2016 4:25 PM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 542May 24, 2016 4:28 PM

[quote]if we ignore them they will go away.

We will not go away until you leave our children and us alone, you dirty fucking goyim!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 543May 24, 2016 4:28 PM

the simple fact that Wood made a 180° turn and denies it now says everything we need to know about it

by Anonymousreply 544May 24, 2016 4:33 PM

I think it's sad you are doing this to Elijah. It's obvious to me that he was trying to help someone else: a close friend, a former colleague, etc...

This is what he gets for his bravery.

by Anonymousreply 545May 24, 2016 4:34 PM

I wonder if the zionist troll here knows that the idea that being Jewish or a Zionist is a 'race' is against Judaism?

Also a lot of Jews are white, especially Ashkenazi and sephardic jews but there are Jewish people of all races.

But trolls, Zionists, and pro-Israeli fools like you certainly put the Nazi in Ashkenazi.

Very true R544. I wonder if he was threatened or told that if he did not recant that he would never find work in TV or film as an actor again?

by Anonymousreply 546May 24, 2016 4:36 PM

Parents who push their kids into show business are monsters.

This place seems safe and nurturing, and even still it sounds like a fucking nightmare!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 547May 24, 2016 4:38 PM

The Jewish Talmud says that 3 years old is old enough to diddle.

Why do you people hate God and his Chosenbergs?

by Anonymousreply 548May 24, 2016 4:41 PM

R548 talks about Jews and Judaism more than actual Jews. That doesn't mean you know anything. And you couldn't even give it away at any age.

by Anonymousreply 549May 24, 2016 4:43 PM

Jews LOVE Woody Allen, and Roman Polanski, and all the Jews who run Hollywood.

And Jews never talk about Jeffrey Epstein either.

by Anonymousreply 550May 24, 2016 4:46 PM

Yesterday I thought this thread had gone off the rails. Boy was I in for a fun surprise today--it's gone off the rails, down the mountainside and has crashed into antiSemite valley!

by Anonymousreply 551May 24, 2016 4:48 PM

What EW did was brave, and now he is protecting his own self, as we are all designed to do, except the mothers who protect their own children even above themselves (or at least some do).

by Anonymousreply 552May 24, 2016 4:58 PM

The silence form Jew-run Hollywood is deafening. Where's all the producers and directors who were in charge of these children who are now fucked up? What's Katzenjew or Spieljew's opinion on Hollywood pedophilia? Hmmmmmmm? Methinks they are in fact the abusers and enablers.

Remember the truth, morons: If these pedos were Arab or Muslim, Obama would be bombing them. This would be in the news 24/7.

by Anonymousreply 553May 24, 2016 5:07 PM

A lot of these ex-kid performers who know as much or more about this as he did will probably never speak up out of fear or shame. They shouldn't be; it is not their fault they were abused.

by Anonymousreply 554May 24, 2016 5:12 PM

What is with Cindy Crawford pimping out her underage kids?

by Anonymousreply 555May 24, 2016 5:23 PM

R553, where's non-Jew Hollywood? Why hasn't Mel Gibson spoken up--everyone knows he hates Jews already, so what's the risk?

Oh, and as for Arab/Muslim pedos, the US government funded little boy rape parties through DynaCorp. But keep trying with your bullshit.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 556May 24, 2016 5:51 PM

[quote]Why hasn't Mel Gibson spoken up--everyone knows he hates Jews already, so what's the risk?

He is a conspicuous Catholic and the Catholic Church has a well-reported pedophilia problem of its own.

by Anonymousreply 557May 24, 2016 6:00 PM

Gibson is one of those traditionalist Catholics who thinks everything post-Vatican II is heresy. He doesn't associate with the official Catholic Church. Still, lots of other non-Jews in Hollywood.

by Anonymousreply 558May 24, 2016 6:03 PM

R389 There was no pedo ring involved in the death of Jon Benet Ramsey. The parents or their son did it. Patsy's actions that morning seemed extremely suspect.

R557 He is not a "modern Catholic". He's a pre -Vatican II Catholic,so he hates so-called Catholics as well.

The Jews and Scientologists in Hollywood are hiding something. I wonder how much the Clam scammers know and holding it over everyone else in Hollywood.

by Anonymousreply 559May 24, 2016 6:04 PM

R554 Elijah clarified he has no knowledge other than films, articles; he likely addressed the article because people were wrongly assuming he had direct intel.

by Anonymousreply 560May 24, 2016 6:04 PM

r554, if the victims won't talk then nobody will listen to the stories. They will remain a cover-up.

Again, the ex-child stars must speak out. Because SS and KatzenJew and the other Pedo Jews will not. They just keep cranking out the 'Hitler killed Jews' propaganda, promoting deadly agendas like war, etc. And only me, the genius, acknowledges the scam.

Because I'm not a fucking moron. Like most of you sissies.

by Anonymousreply 561May 24, 2016 6:05 PM

I went to the library and found that Rob Reiner did a kiddie video or two...WTF? Is this sicko hiding in plain sight. He likes them that young?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 562May 24, 2016 6:10 PM

What does our beloved Lavender Mafia know about this? I hope Sandy Gallin, Geffen and other power Hollywood gays are not turning a blind eye to this abuse. If they are turning a blind eye then who the fuck will speak out?

by Anonymousreply 563May 24, 2016 6:13 PM

Where is the Rob Reiner gossip coming from? I've never heard anything about him being a pedo before. Sources?

by Anonymousreply 564May 24, 2016 6:17 PM

I'm sure Pervo Harvey Levin, the cover-up Queen of Jewwywood, knows where bodies are buried. I don't doubt he knows and pals around with other powerful Jew Pedos.

He's Jewish. He's Gay. He's a powerful Hollywood elite. Methinks he knows a lot.

by Anonymousreply 565May 24, 2016 6:49 PM

R481, Unless you're being sarcastic, everything on this thread like all other DL threads is just an opinion including media sources. The point of quoting tabloid type sites is to prove the story is spreading or maybe it's just a slow news day.

R471, There are many laws in the books the most extremely observant Jews follow that they overlook deeming them not as important as others in today's modern world. Re the prohibition on homosexuality, there's a pervasive fear that the Haredi sect will die out. Therefore it's crucial that offspring have large families. Now there are single women that for many reasons are child-free, don't adopt, nor marry widowers with kids. Also today there are gay men that raise Jewish children of their own or/and financially provide for relatives' kids. Which do you think is more acceptable to the ultra-religious? As long as the latter go out side of the physical community to go to a gay bar, like the straights who go outside the general area to enjoy a "tittie bar" (yes their a bunch of hypocrites) everything's acceptable.

Also the belief of superiority to Christians or of being The Chosen People does not exist among secular Jews. It's mainly a reaction to being constantly picked on for generations and would be comparable to the original non-violent Black Pride movement. Many ultra-Orthodox are distrustful of those from outside their community which would include secular Jews and the less religious. The feeling is often mutual. Everything from the standards of acceptable dress to the choice of a movie to appropriate food is so different.

Jews who are not Orthodox both in Israel and the US consider the Haredi and Chassidic beyond meshugana and rather embarrassing for the rest of the Jewish community and wish they'd adapt to the "real world."

by Anonymousreply 566May 24, 2016 6:49 PM

@R560 Elijah knows an awful lot but has backed down, bc. either he's been warned or he wasn't expecting such swift and overwhelming reaction.

It could also be possible that the person he's helping or protecting has asked him to keep mum for the time being.

I've always got the impression he was gay but not prepared to come out. He has maybe been threatened with an outing.

by Anonymousreply 567May 24, 2016 6:52 PM

Will the Jew-obsessed troll go away? Pedos come in all forms, dude.

by Anonymousreply 568May 24, 2016 6:52 PM

R482, If Jodie Foster has such a poor rep within Hollywood then how did she get her last film financed? Hear it's a modest success. Strange she'd shoot it with a script that's been heavily criticized as dated according to Hollywood media sources. Haven't seen the movie nor read the script so don't know if that's just the silly opinion of jealous writers or not.

by Anonymousreply 569May 24, 2016 6:53 PM

Elijah can come out all he wants, his fans know and won't turn on him for that. Besides, it might swerve his career in a more interesting direction.

by Anonymousreply 570May 24, 2016 6:54 PM

Which film is that, R569?

by Anonymousreply 571May 24, 2016 6:54 PM

Rob Reiner

He puts himself as very moral and concerned, and campaigned hard against smoking in CA. When the referendum won, he became the beneficiary of all those new tax dollars when he was appointed heard of the new smoking board.

Beware of concerned and moral Jews.

As for pedo, I doubt it -- he was probably chasing after the mothers.

by Anonymousreply 572May 24, 2016 6:55 PM

R550, What are you talking about? It was JEWISH prosecutors in FL who publicly condemned Epstein in the media, a JEWISH writer who authored the story, and a JEWISH editor who helped too. Bet the media was partly JEWISH owned as well. So BS on your claim that Epstein wasn't called out for immorality by other Jews. In fact the JEWISH Judge asked that he be dealt with far more harshly because he came from an educated family and had had more opportunities than the average criminal in his court. Too bad the JEWISH prosecutors were stymied by the pedo's $100,000 donation to FL police dept. Please stop derailing this thread. Obviously you support the pedos. Exactly what have YOU done to stop any pedos/rapists? Sounds like YOU are a pedo/rapist/BULLY yourself. You certainly have the mentality of those despicable 2-legged beings.

I am starting Part II for when this thread is full.

Back on topic, is there anything DL can do?

by Anonymousreply 573May 24, 2016 7:16 PM

Of course EW knows more than he's read about or seen on a documentary. He's not a Trappist. When he brought up Savile and went into his viral riff he may or may not have had an agenda. The UK hack smelled that and went big with it, given that at the very least it's Hollywood, and right there with the grim new zeitgeist.

Of course again EW soon had a call from His People, magnitude of sternness unknown, to dial it down and distance. If he hadn't done that, he'd be the go-to guy for the lifted curtain forever. 'Lesson learned' perhaps, but too late, what he said can't be unsaid. Public cynicism will grow given the Cosby situation. You really can't fool all the people all the time.

Embedded power will doubtless hold the line, no point in being powerful otherwise. Maybe there'll be an odd death or two to keep things tidy. 'The Dream Factory' will though it's to be hoped face ever more robust scepticism. Meanwhile, best of luck to EW.

by Anonymousreply 574May 24, 2016 7:17 PM

"'The Dream Factory' will though it's to be hoped face ever more robust scepticism."

- Such elegant syntax! A sentence that simply rolls off the tongue.

by Anonymousreply 575May 24, 2016 7:21 PM

R574 like the way you've summed it up so nicely. Very likely that's what happened

by Anonymousreply 576May 24, 2016 7:23 PM

R574 Well, of course Elijah's heard rumors, but unless he himself has first hand knowledge and or evidence, he won't be going to police with hearsay.

by Anonymousreply 577May 24, 2016 7:26 PM

r133, the names listed in Jeffrey Epstein's address book is mindblowing and depressing. Obviously a lot of former actresses are being paid for their time and lots of spurious male stars sourcing the sex from him.

by Anonymousreply 578May 24, 2016 7:33 PM

R476, LAPD will never do a decent job of ridding LA County of compulsive pedos let alone those in the entertainment industry which brings so much $$ to the financially struggling State of CA. I had occasional trouble simply getting all of my promised pay for jobs until I joined the union. Government employees view those working in acting as not wishing to take a "real job" but just having fun and wanting to get out of the house. Yes I was told that more than once for complaining about easy to fix very illegal activities.

Recall Scientology still operates despite constant complaints of abuse et al in Hollywood as well. If parents won't do their due diligence no one else will do it for them.

by Anonymousreply 579May 24, 2016 7:33 PM

R566 Actually, Jews were already calling themselves the Chosen Ones 2500-3000 years ago while enslaving, massacring and forcefully circumcising neighboring tribes, nations, or just filthy goyim (all part of Yahweh's plan, blah blah).

It's just typical organized religion behavior. Get a charismatic speaker and you got yourself an army.

by Anonymousreply 580May 24, 2016 7:36 PM

Where is that list, R578?

by Anonymousreply 581May 24, 2016 7:41 PM

Could someone create another thread to get rid of the crazies?? We are very close to the 600 limit

by Anonymousreply 582May 24, 2016 7:44 PM

R580 The Ancient Greeks felt the same way calling other people barbarians. Most secular Jews don't know about the anti-Christian bias/anti-non Jewish in the Talmud because they didn't learn it. If they did I think they would be shocked by it.

by Anonymousreply 583May 24, 2016 7:50 PM

R581, Not R578 but here's a start of pedo Epstein's list:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 584May 24, 2016 7:56 PM

R583, Only the most ultra-Orthodox read and/or pay attention to what's written in the Talmud. Like the Old Testament there are many laws and rules on how to live one's life that are clearly no longer followed in today's modern society. For example if you are an out gay man and your brother died then you would be obligated to marry your now widowed sister-in-law. Right.

R548, Furthermore when the Talmud talks about a man "lying with" a 3-year-old is it really incest or how are you actually defining "lying?" Sleeping in the same bed without actual intercourse occurring could by defined as "lying." Clearly stated it was not to be done after the age of 9. Still it was a different period of time with vastly varied moral standards. If a girl or boy was an orphan the only way to survive was to be sold as a slave. One could only hope for fair treatment.

by Anonymousreply 585May 24, 2016 8:06 PM

Thanks for that, R584

by Anonymousreply 586May 24, 2016 8:13 PM

R505, Re Drew Barrymore, Can't understand any actor who opens a Production Studio and produces a film without very experienced and talented industry players doing most of the actual work. Isn't that what Brad Pitt actually does? Why would anyone give Drew so much money for a re-do of Charlies' Angeles without numerous technical advisers on set? Is she that stubborn and controlling?

Still can't understand the sexual appeal of a very young child of either sex, especially after the 1st few times. Did Drew consider it normal to sleep with "half of Hollywood?" Agree that the root of the problem could be overindulgence in drugs and alcohol and not being able to refuse.

by Anonymousreply 587May 24, 2016 8:14 PM

R561 a lot of jews are professional victims and will constantly make Hitler or holocaust references, say they have it the worst, or cry anti semitism about stuff that has nothing to do with Hitler, the Holocaust, or actual bigotry. They also ignore everyone else that was not Jewish who was in a concentration camp or killed in the Holocaust, and ignore other acts of genocide through history.

by Anonymousreply 588May 24, 2016 8:17 PM

R574 You are a liar and a slanderer. The victims are suing the fed prosecutors in the Epstein case because of a sweetheart, non-prosecution deal they gave him. A FEDERAL INVESTIGATION BEGAN AT THE REQUEST OF PALM BEACH POLICE because he thought the State prosecutor was giving Epstein preferential treatment.

" But instead of proceeding with such charges on his own, the Palm Beach County state attorney took the rare step of presenting a broad range of possible charges to a grand jury, which indicted Mr. Epstein in July on the lesser count. In Florida, prosecutors usually refer only capital cases to grand juries.

Even before the indictment, the Palm Beach police chief, Michael Reiter, had accused prosecutors of giving Mr. Epstein special treatment and asked the state attorney, Barry E. Krischer, to remove himself from the case. "

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 589May 24, 2016 8:28 PM

R556, Did you read the article from the Houston Press that your media source linked?

" . . . this isn't DynCorp's first brush with the sex-slavery game. Back in Bosnia in 1999, US policewoman Kathryn Bolkovac was fired from DynCorp after blowing the whistle on a sex-slave ring operating on one of our bases there. DynCorp's employees were accused of raping and peddling girls as young as 12 from countries like Ukraine, Moldova and Romania. The company was forced to settle lawsuits against Bolkovac (whose story was recently told in the feature film The Whistleblower) and another man who informed authorities about DynCorp's sex ring."

Now for the real question, Did anyone on "The Whistleblower" have to pimp themselves to get a job on that movie? Wouldn't that be ironic.

by Anonymousreply 590May 24, 2016 8:28 PM

What about Kesha and Dr Luke? Dr Luke is Jewish too

by Anonymousreply 591May 24, 2016 8:44 PM

And just like that the anti-Semitism on this thread has done away with whatever credibility or interest it could have had. Somebody obviously wanted to prevent a real dialogue from happening or juicy bits from seeing the light. Shame really.

by Anonymousreply 592May 24, 2016 8:55 PM

Not until recently have I ever heard any suggestion that Steven Spielberg has a sexual interest in very young males, but I remember being surprised by a scene in "War Horse." I don't remember the details, but I think it's a scene in a barn where Jeremy Irvine either has his shirt open or completely off. There's one medium closeup shot framing Irvine's face and upper chest, and one of his nipples is very prominent in the frame. When I saw it, I thought that whoever set up and directed that shot had to be interested in Irvine as a sex object. Irvine was 20 or 21 at the time of filming, so not underage, but he sure looks young in that movie, and I was really struck by the sexual nature of that close up. (I looked for a still or footage from that scene online but couldn't find anything.)

by Anonymousreply 593May 24, 2016 9:01 PM

R590, what's your point?

by Anonymousreply 594May 24, 2016 9:07 PM

The webperson here HATES pedo threads.

by Anonymousreply 595May 24, 2016 9:09 PM

R559 With all due respect you do not know what you are talking about. A pedo ring involvement in the case is not a theory i pulled out of thin air, there is actual testimony, a police report made by a woman with verifiable family ties to Fleet White, friend of John Ramsey who was with Ramsey when he 'found' the body of Jonbenet. This woman alleges, with great detail and credibility, that Ramsey aka 'Uncle Johnny' was the money man who managed and laundered the profits from the porn the ring produced using this woman, her siblings and cousins as the 'talent'. The woman produced therapy records to show she had talked about this ring well before the murder of JBR. Her therapist was harassed and threatened by members of her family. She claims her mother and little niece were present when JBR was killed. Her niece is/was horrifically traumatized. The minute it was clear the woman had blown the whistle, her family hustled the niece out of the country. There is much more to the story, including the ties the patriarch of the ring, Fleet Sr., had with Goldie Hawn. Google Nancy Krebs.

by Anonymousreply 596May 24, 2016 9:10 PM

I made the mistake of reading most of this thread last night before bed.

I feel like crap today. Not to mention, I can't think of anything joyful or entertaining about show business.

by Anonymousreply 597May 24, 2016 9:10 PM

R597 What about me?

by Anonymousreply 598May 24, 2016 9:13 PM

Just like R593, I noticed those types of shots in most SS movies when I was a teen (I'm female). River Phoenix in Indy 3 is another example. James Cameron does the same thing (see T2, and how Edward Furlong turned out - he was routinely sent to Japan, for chrissakes). But with SS, it's very distinct. And somehow, I wonder if the topic of Catch Me If You Can (lying and covering up) isn't adjacent to that. It's his best movie, in fact it's his only good movie.

And I stand by S8E2 from Columbo. They must have got the idea from somewhere. There's also an episode with Irish comedian Connolly playing a music composer, top stuff but it's a different one.

by Anonymousreply 599May 24, 2016 9:13 PM

Especially you, Ethel.

by Anonymousreply 600May 24, 2016 9:14 PM

Don't forget SUPER 8

and Joe Dante's films which are filled with young beautiful boys

by Anonymousreply 601May 24, 2016 9:16 PM

Surprised they haven't closed this thread yet. They must like the traffic it brings in

by Anonymousreply 602May 24, 2016 9:20 PM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!