Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

If Bernie wins NV then is Hillary done?

Well?

by Anonymousreply 313January 29, 2020 3:56 AM

He's ahead by 19, I worry that my be the case.

by Anonymousreply 1February 15, 2016 3:59 AM

link please r1. Thanks.

by Anonymousreply 2February 15, 2016 4:00 AM

Will you Bernbots give it a rest for at least a couple of days?

by Anonymousreply 3February 15, 2016 4:06 AM

Still waiting for that link!

by Anonymousreply 4February 15, 2016 4:07 AM

The poll out of NV that had them tied was horseshit, Maddow looked into it

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5February 15, 2016 4:07 AM

He's NOT going to win Saturday, although it will be somewhat close.

Besides WHY would it over for her? She's ahead of him in South Carolina by more than 50 points.

Now I get to start a Las Vegas style grease for you OP for thinking she's going to drop out because YOU said so. I already have the gunpowder and the lighter fluid just for an idiot like you. The vat's waiting for you.

by Anonymousreply 6February 15, 2016 4:08 AM

Coming from a nursing home rapist such as yourself r6, that's rich.

by Anonymousreply 7February 15, 2016 4:16 AM

No, OP... she'll still be way ahead in the delegate count. And she'll be taking South Carolina easily.

This isn't going to be over anytime soon.

by Anonymousreply 8February 15, 2016 4:17 AM

Nevada means little in the final tally. The big contest is coming up on Super Tuesday. That's when the vote goes on in several states all on the same day. If Hillary gets swept then, she will be in trouble. Otherwise she can continue on.

by Anonymousreply 9February 15, 2016 4:23 AM

Who is Maddow rooting for? I haven't seen her show in a long time.

by Anonymousreply 10February 15, 2016 4:28 AM

R7 I'm hurt by YOUR words.

Let me stop bullshitting. Grease are specifically made for rancid cunts like you. Your horrific and well deserved death can't come soon enough.

by Anonymousreply 11February 15, 2016 4:28 AM

That's sweet, r11. You must be fun at parties. Hopefully you and your family will be in a plane crash soon.

by Anonymousreply 12February 15, 2016 4:35 AM

What do the Nevada polls say at present!

by Anonymousreply 13February 15, 2016 4:38 AM

No way Bernie will catch her in Nevade. This will be the beginning of the end for Bernie's campaign

by Anonymousreply 14February 15, 2016 4:41 AM

Seriously, what do the Nevada polls indicate at present?

by Anonymousreply 15February 15, 2016 6:22 AM

r15 Looks like nobody knows - Very little polling has been done in NV - Democrats are able to register at their caucus location on the day of which would seem to favor younger voter participation - I live in Las Vegas and have been contacted by both campaigns - The Sanders Campaign has even been emailing me asking me if I plan to caucus for Bernie on Saturday - I replied today that I would be caucusing for Hillary and received the following response "Good luck, you'll need it!" - Both Hillary and Bernie held rallies today in Las Vegas - The NV Democratic Party is also holding caucuses on The Strip Saturday so that casino workers can participate - This move benefits Hillary as she has the endorsement of the Las Vegas Culinary Union, a very influential and powerful group of people in Southern Nevada - We will see how it all shakes out on Saturday

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16February 15, 2016 6:34 AM

Super Tuesday is probably going to close the door on one of them. Speaking realistically, it will probably be when Bernie gets shut out of the running. So far the states have been small and democrats in them are mostly college kids and white liberals. Once the primary opens up to the big states it gets very, very hard for Bernie.

I honestly don't see how he can do it. I think people hoping for a miracle are like Christie hoping for a third place showing in NH.

by Anonymousreply 17February 15, 2016 6:41 AM

Do you trust the Inquisitr?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 18February 15, 2016 6:41 AM

Do you have a link to the Culinary Union endorsement, r16? Last I heard, they weren't endorsing anyone until after the Nevada caucus. There's certainly no love lost between the old-guard Culinary members and the Clinton campaign after the 2008 election.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19February 15, 2016 6:45 AM

Thanks, R16. That was a bit flippant of the Sanders volunteer to say that, considering they'll need your vote if their candidate wins the primary.

by Anonymousreply 20February 15, 2016 6:45 AM

Even at this time of maximum momentum for the Sanders campaign, Clinton is up between 16 and 40 points in California, New York, Florida and Texas. How can Bernie possibly surmount that?

I think the sanders people have to focus on what's really important in 2016 and that is not hating Hillary.

by Anonymousreply 21February 15, 2016 6:49 AM

Nevada's caucus system is reportedly Byzantine and difficult to poll, so there's little information available. That said, Hillary's campaign manager Robby Mook managed her campaign in Nevada in 2008.

It's not over for Hillary until Super Tuesday, but it's over for Bernie if he doesn't win in Nevada *and* South Carolina. If he wants to prove that his followers are serious, let's see him tell them to protest and demonstrate until the Senate advises and consents to Obama's SCOTUS nomination. It's the best chance we have of seeing any if Bernie's proposals come to fruition given the makeup of the House, regardless of whether he wins or not. A Constitutional amendment is extraordinarily difficult for a reason, and the best chance we have is for another case to be brought before a newly-oriented Court to reverse Citizens United.

by Anonymousreply 22February 15, 2016 6:50 AM

[quote]It's not over for Hillary until Super Tuesday, but it's over for Bernie if he doesn't win in Nevada *and* South Carolina.

Agree. The really big states are all solidly behind Clinton so Bernie has to win everywhere else to make any kind of showing at the convention.

by Anonymousreply 23February 15, 2016 6:59 AM

My guess is that Hillary wins South Carolina; Bernie wins Nevada.

Super Tuesday — which is March 1, 2016 — will give the indication of who wins the nomination. M

by Anonymousreply 24February 15, 2016 7:04 AM

R21,

Iowa and New Hampshire begin the national trends for both parties.

You’re not informed with those likely outdated numbers.

by Anonymousreply 25February 15, 2016 7:06 AM

Rhode Island is the most important state, though, isn't it?

by Anonymousreply 26February 15, 2016 7:08 AM

R25, Iowa and New Hampshire have the first scheduled primaries. They do not "begin the trends". Cite your sources or I'll give you a C-, millennial bernbot.

by Anonymousreply 27February 15, 2016 7:09 AM

As Delaware goes, so goes the nation!

by Anonymousreply 28February 15, 2016 7:12 AM

[quote]Iowa and New Hampshire begin the national trends for both parties.

No, not for the democrats they don't. Not at all.

by Anonymousreply 29February 15, 2016 7:13 AM

Nevada leads the nation in foreclosures. Bernie has been speaking out against the crooked banks for years.

He will slaughter Hillary in Nevada.

Hillary's fave Goldman Sachs has yet another scandal.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30February 15, 2016 7:43 AM

Bill Clinton is sabotaging his wife as usual. He did it in 2008 too.

The statement linked below is going to hurt Hillary in NV and SC.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 31February 15, 2016 7:50 AM

Yes, she will drop out immediately to satisfy neocon Bernie Bro!

by Anonymousreply 32February 15, 2016 10:19 AM

The only way Hillary's narrative of taking it all ends is if he wins SC, and then makes huge gains on Super Tuesday, and that's not going to happen.

Your boy's day in the sun is almost over, thank god.

by Anonymousreply 33February 15, 2016 12:02 PM

[quote]Rhode Island is the most important state, though, isn't it?

No. North Dakota is. Then Montana, Wyoming, and South Dakota.

by Anonymousreply 34February 15, 2016 12:21 PM

[quote]"Good luck, you'll need it!"

Tacky

by Anonymousreply 35February 15, 2016 12:23 PM

Why can't whomever wins name the other one as running mate?

by Anonymousreply 36February 15, 2016 12:27 PM

Here's a good article and table on what each campaign is targeting for each contest.

Cue another meltdown over superdelegates in 1...2...3...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 37February 15, 2016 12:32 PM

If Bernie continues to do well Obama will nominate Hillary for the Supreme Court, this gives her a graceful out.

by Anonymousreply 38February 15, 2016 12:37 PM

[quote]No. North Dakota is. Then Montana, Wyoming, and South Dakota.

Actually the decisive battlegrounds are American Samoa, Guam and the Virgin Islands.

by Anonymousreply 39February 15, 2016 12:54 PM

R33 is bitter.

Sad.

by Anonymousreply 40February 15, 2016 1:05 PM

R36, Hillary & Bernie won't name each other as VP because ....

It might be considered a step down from Senator/Sec of State. Politicians rarely take a lower position, unless there's been a scandal (S. Carolina Governor Mark Sanford; NY Governor Eliot Spitzer).

Also, they're both at the same political end of the spectrum, they need a more conservative person to balance out. It would also help if that person was Latino from a swing state, too. Florida, Texas, Virginia maybe.

Also, who knows if they can even stand each other? Neither is willing to give up the top spot just yet.

by Anonymousreply 41February 15, 2016 1:28 PM

r36 because socialist.

by Anonymousreply 42February 15, 2016 1:33 PM

[quote] Even at this time of maximum momentum for the Sanders campaign, Clinton is up between 16 and 40 points in California, New York, Florida and Texas. How can Bernie possibly surmount that?

Citing polls that were done months ago or even weeks ago is irrelevant. There were polls in the fall that had Hillary ahead by 40 points in Iowa. Until we get more recent polls and the candidates start actively campaigning in other states we don't know where the race really stands in those states.

by Anonymousreply 43February 15, 2016 1:33 PM

OP, ask yourself, If Hillary wins NV then is Bernie done? It is unlikely either of these candidates are done until it is mathematically impossible for them to win the nomination.

by Anonymousreply 44February 15, 2016 1:37 PM

[quote] Do you have a link to the Culinary Union endorsement, [R16]? Last I heard, they weren't endorsing anyone until after the Nevada caucus.

You're correct. The Culinary Union isn't endorsing. Either R16 is just making shit up, or in his/her delusional mind, everyone is endorsing Hillary.

by Anonymousreply 45February 15, 2016 1:39 PM

Republicans have run a really nasty push-poll with completely bogus results to make Bernie look good and Hillary look like she's having real trouble in the state.

Republicans are doing a LOT of funding of Bernie campaigns.

That should tell you something: They're terrified of a Hillary presidency, and think they can beat Bernie in a walk.

by Anonymousreply 46February 15, 2016 1:50 PM

The CU is NOT endorsing Hillary, as of yet, or perhaps at all. What's really interesting is the lack of polling after her stunning defeat in NH, and before the foaming at the mouth bot boys run in with their digital pitchforks to refute, it WAS a stunning loss, one her campaign did not expect, no matter what you read.

by Anonymousreply 47February 15, 2016 1:52 PM

The culinary union, which was surreptitiously invaded by Sanders campaign workers, is not endorsing anyone before the caucuses this year.

Its membership has overwhelmingly endorsed Nevada State Sen. Ruben Kihuen in the current Democratic primary for the 4th Congressional District. He is a superdelegate pledged to, and campaigning for, Clinton.

His opponent, Lucy Flores, was not endorsed by the members of the culinary union. She is supporting Sanders.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 48February 15, 2016 2:03 PM

Her defeat in NH wasn't "stunning" it was expected. And he had approximately the same exact percentage support back in 2008 when she WON.

Sorry. You're wrong in your assertion. The campaign DID expect it, no matter what you say. I actually followed the campaign and the polling, so your attempt to rewrite history here is pretty obvious to me.

by Anonymousreply 49February 15, 2016 2:03 PM

Nevada State Senator Ruben Kihuen at a Las Vegas Marriage Equality rally.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50February 15, 2016 2:05 PM

Looking like more cracks in her structures.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 51February 15, 2016 2:06 PM

Nevada State Senator Ruben Kihuen's ice-bucket thing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 52February 15, 2016 2:06 PM

I’m looking forward to the general election if Donald Trump vs. Bernie Sanders.

by Anonymousreply 53February 15, 2016 2:31 PM

It sounds like it's going to be much like Iowa. A near tie. So, Hillary is still the most likely nominee in the end.

by Anonymousreply 54February 15, 2016 2:51 PM

When will it EVER end with you BernBros?

By now even you have to know the GOP are sharpening their knives to stab Bernie Caesar Style.

Their cheerleading on his behalf is VERY creepy. Whatever movement Sanders is trying to push will burst into flames. The Republicans will see to that.

For the umpteenth time, the GOP wants you fighting. They want you to stay at home if HRC gets the nod. That's the whole point.

What's telling is the BernBros ignore the half of the country that isn't liberal or liberal leaning. Have fun with that. The Right is not ignoring YOU at all. Thanks to Scalia's, EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN WILL VOTE NOVEMBER no matter WHO their nominee is. I can guarantee it.

by Anonymousreply 55February 15, 2016 2:52 PM

[quote]polls that were done months ago or even weeks ago

No they are the current RCP poll numbers which include polls from after Iowa and NH.

by Anonymousreply 56February 15, 2016 3:06 PM

Wow, Ruben's hot. Any more info on him?

by Anonymousreply 57February 15, 2016 3:10 PM

I like Bernie, but I think Bernie as the nominee = Trump win.

by Anonymousreply 58February 15, 2016 3:12 PM

Has Celine Dion endorsed anyone yet? She carries a lot of weight in Vegas.

by Anonymousreply 59February 15, 2016 3:16 PM

Me too, R58. I guess when one has more than student loans to worry about, and a decent knowledge of recent history, Bernie is great, but we have a Supreme Court seat, which can make all of the difference in our country, is up for grabs I don't think a socialist will beat the ultimate symbol of the 1%,

R59, no one in the US cares what a Canadian pop diva has to say about the potential president.

by Anonymousreply 60February 15, 2016 3:19 PM

[Quote] no one in the US cares what a Canadian pop diva has to say about the potential president.

I believe r59 was joking. Sheeeesh.

by Anonymousreply 61February 15, 2016 3:22 PM

Cher sent water to Flint, so maybe we should listen to the pop divas.

by Anonymousreply 62February 15, 2016 3:30 PM

[quote]Has Celine Dion endorsed anyone yet? She carries a lot of weight in Vegas.

Well, about 220 pounds less than she used to.

by Anonymousreply 63February 15, 2016 3:51 PM

Bern Bros and Bern Hos'

Your thrill and zeal don't go over so well with black ministers and church ladies. Heard it yesterday from the pulpit.

by Anonymousreply 64February 15, 2016 3:56 PM

No. Bernie does not have the troops to win Super Tuesday.

by Anonymousreply 65February 15, 2016 5:07 PM

...........

by Anonymousreply 66February 15, 2016 5:08 PM

I think he will win in Nevada ,but Hillary will win in South Carolina.

by Anonymousreply 67February 15, 2016 5:12 PM

Bernbots -

Please learn how the nomination process actually works before posting your uninformed and silly questions.

The nomination process to identify a candidate is not a general election won by popular vote, nor should it be. It is a process which allows the party to identify the potential candidate with the strongest overall support within the party itself behind whom it can put all of its resources in the general election against the opposing party's candidate.

Super delegates, which Bernbots whinge as a flaw in the system, is actually a feature of it to ensure that we don't end up with a Trump-type candidate.

by Anonymousreply 68February 15, 2016 5:41 PM

[quote]Super delegates, which Bernbots whinge as a flaw in the system, is actually a feature of it to ensure that we don't end up with a Trump-type candidate.

Well, actually, a Saunders-type candidate, truth be told.

by Anonymousreply 69February 15, 2016 6:06 PM

The DNC changed the whole superdelegate process in the 80s out of fear when Jesse Jackson actually looked like he might go somewhere. The guilt over this is what made the DNC & superdelegates become Clinton turncoats and pledge Obama in 08.

by Anonymousreply 70February 15, 2016 7:44 PM

She is running the worst campaign in recent history, even more clueless than her 2008 debacle, I mean really...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 71February 15, 2016 7:44 PM

R71, Politico? Sheesh, as clueless as the idiot quoting the NY Post...

by Anonymousreply 72February 15, 2016 9:32 PM

I live in Nevada and have had two Bernie Sanders people call me so far. Both sounded pretty old (interesting), both offered zero arguments as to why I should vote for Bernie and both immediately hung up when I said I supported Hillary. I kind of expected some type of argument in favor of Bernie, but nothing. Absolutely no comments from them at all, which was weird.

Hillary's group called once, it was a younger woman that spent a long time discussing Hillary with me. She seemed to be fairly well informed, but defensive.

I don't know of anyone here who blames "the big banks" for the housing industry falling apart, as much as they blame extreme overbuilding of cheap houses which were then sold at sky high prices. When the market crashed, there were a lot of crappy overpriced houses underwater and people just dumped them and went back to Okefenokee.

A lot of people in Las Vegas are from somewhere else and they went back there. Virtually every house built in the last two years before the crash ended up underwater. My house doubled in price in two years, so you can't say that pace was going to last.

The issue here was loss of construction jobs, and loss of tourism due to economic recession elsewhere. For a few years, you could literally drive down the street near my home and one strip mall after another was completely vacant. The big box stores were all out of business, dragging down everything else. It looked like a modern day Great Depression. Nevada was one of the hardest hit states in the country.

I'm not saying banks didn't have their hand in that, I'm just saying that Las Vegas was extremely real estate powered and not diverse, too much wild speculation in the housing market with too much risk. Builders were extremely reckless. Everything that was in progress when the Great Recession happened was either put on hold, downgraded in size, or stopped in the middle. Near the Strip, builders were continuing to build with absolutely no buyers in sight.

How does that translate to votes? I'm not sure it's quite as simple as, "if the banks had been fine there never would have been a housing bubble." Construction firms were putting out cardboard shacks, charging a fortune and that couldn't have been sustained forever. But maybe others don't think of it like that.

by Anonymousreply 73February 16, 2016 12:34 AM

How could Trump win? Who would ever vote for him and why?

by Anonymousreply 74February 16, 2016 12:36 AM

Hillary will WIN NV right after her win in SC...don't worry!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 75February 16, 2016 7:13 AM

r73 you are doing this wrong. It's KILL THE WALL STREET OVERLORDS! RAPE THEIR WIVES AND HUSBANDS! MAKE THEM PAY FOR YOUR STUDENT DEBT AND DAY CARE!

by Anonymousreply 76February 16, 2016 7:19 AM

[quote] Hillary will WIN NV right after her win in SC...don't worry!

That'll be hard, considering that the Nevada caucus comes a week before the SC primary.

by Anonymousreply 77February 17, 2016 3:39 AM

R76, I will try that method:

I'm so mistreated! Free stuff! If Bernie says so, it will happen, even if there isn't a single Republican Congress member that will vote for it! Old women are ugly and disgusting! And not hip!!!!!1!!!!!11!

Feel the BERN!

by Anonymousreply 78February 17, 2016 3:49 AM

R77 thought SC was first then NV oooooops still she's gonna WIN both states!

by Anonymousreply 79February 17, 2016 4:28 AM

The world is more about those over 40 then those clueless millennials that are under 40 they have no idea what socialism is about....their parents should advise them properly to NOT vote for Bernie...Come on Mommy & Daddy you know better and that Bernie will not win the election! The USA will not become a Socialist Country!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80February 17, 2016 6:16 AM

Hillary is on track to lose NV! Total collapse on the way!!!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 81February 17, 2016 2:09 PM

R81, your definition of "total collapse" is ... amusing.

So if Hillary wins South Carolina by a large margin, will you be predicting Bernie's "Total Collapse"?

Or are you just horribly biased and spinning your little wheels off?

by Anonymousreply 82February 17, 2016 2:12 PM

Her health is falling apart as well, serious serious health issues, second manic coughing fit in less than a month, very troubling.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 83February 17, 2016 2:15 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 84February 17, 2016 2:24 PM

Speaking as much as she has and does has to take a toll on anyone.

And Bernie isn't any healthier, and he IS a lot older.

So fuck off with that shit.

by Anonymousreply 85February 17, 2016 2:29 PM

Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina are really among the least representative states in the union. Why do we care what their voters think?

by Anonymousreply 86February 17, 2016 3:00 PM

Hillary is narrowly ahead in Nevada. How is that going to work out for Bernie?

by Anonymousreply 87February 17, 2016 4:02 PM

link, r87. Thanks.

by Anonymousreply 88February 17, 2016 4:08 PM

[quote]Who is Maddow rooting for? I haven't seen her show in a long time.

She seems to be playing it right down the middle, which is what I'd expect from a pro.

by Anonymousreply 89February 17, 2016 4:09 PM

[Quote] She seems to be playing it right down the middle, which is what I'd expect from a pro.

[Bold] SHE HATES HILLARY AND IS CLEARLY A BERNBOT! LAST NIGHTS SHOW WAS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF IT!

by Anonymousreply 90February 17, 2016 4:16 PM

Relaxing, deep breaths, R90.

by Anonymousreply 91February 17, 2016 4:26 PM

The last time I saw Rachel, Bernie's dick was so far down her throat I thought she'd gone straight.

by Anonymousreply 92February 17, 2016 4:29 PM

I was angry talking to some people about this election. These were people who said they wanted Hillary but they were going to vote for Sanders to force her to move to the left.

I was telling them they were playing a reckless game because they know that Sanders can't win in the General and they are really doing the work of the republicans without even realizing it.

by Anonymousreply 93February 17, 2016 4:33 PM

OP, it ain't over, till it's over.

by Anonymousreply 94February 17, 2016 4:44 PM

R93 they don't need to help the Repugs. You just know that enormous amounts of the funding to Bernie is coming from the Koch Bros funnelled through the "little people" who are also no doubt paying plenty of trolls on social media to fake being BernieBots.

The Clintons are always the GOP's biggest nightmare.

by Anonymousreply 95February 17, 2016 4:45 PM

Koch money funded through others - isn't this illegal?

by Anonymousreply 96February 17, 2016 4:49 PM

Maddow may love Bernie but I would like to think that she is smart enough to realize that his promises of pixies and fairies may not be reality.

by Anonymousreply 97February 17, 2016 5:11 PM

Hillary is ahead by nearly 20 points, so I don't think it's an issue.

by Anonymousreply 98February 17, 2016 5:51 PM

Nate Silver upped Hillary's chances of winning to 69%- up from 50% yesterday.

by Anonymousreply 99February 17, 2016 6:02 PM

Why don't you bitches ever include links?

by Anonymousreply 100February 17, 2016 6:14 PM

People are voting wrong! Get out there and stop them! Voters can not be allowed to decide for themselves!

by Anonymousreply 101February 17, 2016 6:19 PM

OK I'll bite. It's called a discussion and opinions R101. Maybe you didn't take that course in school yet. Take it in your sophomore year.

by Anonymousreply 102February 17, 2016 7:07 PM

Hillary COUGHED! She must be dying of lung cancer! MUST BE!

by Anonymousreply 103February 17, 2016 7:26 PM

HILLARY!

COUGH!

CANCER!

CONSUMPTION!

PANTS SUIT!

BENGHAZI!

FEEL THE BERN!

by Anonymousreply 104February 17, 2016 7:27 PM

She's gonna need a bigger cough...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 105February 17, 2016 7:45 PM

That post nasal drip can kill!

by Anonymousreply 106February 17, 2016 8:33 PM

She's probably coughing from dry throat from talking in overheated rooms for days on end. Bernie could barely croak out a few words after New Hampshire. It's the dry heat from being in cold places with the heat on high.

by Anonymousreply 107February 17, 2016 8:43 PM

In addition the AFL-CIO decides to withhold any endorsements, big plus for Bernie, it's really feeling like 2008 implosion. Expect a shocking turn shortly, if it's a squeak win or loss in NV it's done.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 108February 17, 2016 9:09 PM

WAIT! There's a death watch on Hillary?

Good. Now I can pick out drapery.

by Anonymousreply 109February 17, 2016 9:37 PM

[quote] Hillary is ahead by nearly 20 points, so I don't think it's an issue.

Nope. The new CNN poll has her ahead by only 1 point in Nevada.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 110February 17, 2016 9:41 PM

I was lampooning these threads which are trying to get voters to switch their votes.

by Anonymousreply 111February 17, 2016 11:14 PM

"[R36] because socialist."

English, please.

by Anonymousreply 112February 17, 2016 11:39 PM

112 reasons (and counting!) Hillary Clinton should be our next president and she will be!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 113February 18, 2016 3:12 AM

It's really nearing an end.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 114February 18, 2016 2:56 PM

The town hall meeting just showed how stupid the millennials are.

Millennial: We young people just don't trust politicians. Hillary: Sanders has been in office longer than I have been.

by Anonymousreply 115February 19, 2016 4:07 AM

I know what you mean, R115!

Sanders: in the Senate 25 years.

Hillary: in the Senate 8 years.

Millennials: we want an outsider, from outside Washington, like Bernie!

Reality: *rolls eyes*

by Anonymousreply 116February 19, 2016 4:25 AM

The Empress has no clothes.. never did.

by Anonymousreply 117February 19, 2016 4:31 AM

Millennial: I don't want to listen to a pro-war, career criminal establishment elite for four years as she sells us out at every turn.

by Anonymousreply 118February 19, 2016 4:33 AM

You sound like a Republican, R118.

The only cunt is you.

by Anonymousreply 119February 19, 2016 4:46 AM

Bernie's favorite dish is Korean Puppy Flambé. He's a monster.

by Anonymousreply 120February 19, 2016 5:05 AM

No cunt for you, R118? Now why would that be, is it because every woman on earth is nothing but a set of genitals to you, instead of a human being, or because you're gay?

If you're gay and a millennial, I'd just like to explain, since you probably don't know, we're voting for President, nobody actually expects you to have sex with any of them, thank god. You couldn't pay me to have sex with Bernie.

If you're one of those BernieBros that constantly has to refer to every woman in sight as a cunt, because you're a sniggering little frat boy that hates women, then go collect your 25 cents for the post.

by Anonymousreply 121February 19, 2016 5:13 AM

Coffin. Nails.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 122February 19, 2016 5:26 AM

Bullshit Bernie is 75 more like 85. Way to old.

by Anonymousreply 123February 19, 2016 6:32 AM

Hillary is gravely ill, more like hungry zombie. Cunts.

by Anonymousreply 124February 19, 2016 6:47 AM

and?

by Anonymousreply 125February 19, 2016 3:35 PM

Hillary probably has bronchitis from hanging around in cold New Hampshire. She's not dying. I've had it a million times and I'm still alive.

If you can't shake off bronchitis pretty quickly, it can settle in and become chronic, and drag on for months. She needs to go to some hot place and burn it out, but she can't because she's in the campaign trail. Antibiotics don't always work, especially if you can't stay indoors where it's warm.

Believe me, I know. I've had it from February to August, with six antibiotic refills. I've been going through this most years since my twenties. Being tired and working when you're sick just drags it out. Oddly, you feel absolutely fine though. The coughing upsets others more than the person themselves. Nothing cures it like laying out in the sun.

So don't be surprised if she keeps right in coughing for a while. Eventually she has to go to colder states and that's not going to help.

by Anonymousreply 126February 19, 2016 3:50 PM

[quote] Nothing cures it like laying out in the sun.

You've just proved that, for you, bronchitis is purely psychosomatic.

by Anonymousreply 127February 19, 2016 3:58 PM

Perspective from a layman Canadian millennial:

Sanders may win Nevada. Or Clinton still may. Its a toss up, but possibly leaning more Sanders this time compared to Iowa. Clinton will likely win South Carolina. But Sanders may succeed in getting within 10-15 points if he gets any sort of significant boost in the next week, especially if he wins Nevada.

So: Worst case for Sanders this month: He loses Nevada and loses South Carolina big. This doesn't take him out of the race but it does put too much pressure on him for Super Tuesday and he may break then. Neutral or bad news for Sanders, good news for Clinton. Best case for Sanders this month: He wins Nevada and loses South Carolina. This probably keeps him either stable or on his continued (slight to bigger bumps) upward trajectory. Good news for Sanders, bad news for Clinton.

Conversely: Worst case for Clinton this month: She loses Nevada and wins South Carolina. To be clear, I said win, not 'win big'. This will be devastating to her campaign and she'll be scrambling afterwards. Best case for Clinton this month: She wins Nevada and wins South Carolina big. This will stall or hurt Sanders and only help Clinton as it'll finally boost her Winner narrative at long last.

Basic prediction: Sanders wins Nevada and Clinton wins South Carolina big. Both present themselves strongly but I don't think SC will slow down Sanders much. This race may be much more decided next month. Clinton has been pretty consistently losing support (Biden 'drop out' ping doesn't count, and December slight bump is nearly nothing), while Sanders has been pretty consistently (albeit to small to large degrees) gaining support, so it'll be interesting to see if any SC win clearly helps her out or whether it just stops her from losing harder nationally.

Unlikely outcomes: -Sanders or Clinton win big in Nevada (especially Clinton?). It seems like it'll be at least fairly close. -Sanders wins South Carolina big (maybe if this went on for another month, but not now; unless polling is soooo off) -Either lose either state hugely; the race itself is tight now, like it or not. Even in terms of the supposed Clinton-winning super delegates, these are declared, but they're NOT secured and can and may change at any point until securing at the convention.

by Anonymousreply 128February 19, 2016 4:07 PM

Oh I forgot to add: Summary - No, Hillary is not done. However, her inevitability narrative would all but end (it'd really end in a lackluster or worse performance next month), at least if added to a strong, albeit losing performance in SC by Sanders. It'd add to a possible extended fight between establishment and grassroots, both getting louder and/or more active in attempts to win.

by Anonymousreply 129February 19, 2016 4:09 PM

[quote] She needs to go to some hot place and burn it out, but she can't because she's in the campaign trail.

How do the candidates do it? Hillary and Bernie are both old, and they have to maintain a grueling schedule for months on end with no days off. When they're on the campaign trail, they're eating crappy food and exposed to all sorts of germs, and they have to talk all day long. They appear on the morning news shows and the evening news shows too. They can't be getting more than 4 or 5 hours of sleep at night. What would happen if one of them got very ill and had to miss a whole week or two of campaigning and debates? Do they have access to some special top-secret miracle drugs that keep them going?

by Anonymousreply 130February 19, 2016 4:12 PM

Oh and in terms of any similarities to the Republican fight, what they're going through seems both more open and politically violent, but they also seem like they'd more easily bow down once Trump shows clear enough superiority - unless a Cruz or Rubio or whatever ends up collecting all the support from everyone else and Trump simultaneously drops in polling soon. But Trump seems likely to win both NV and SC so...

Any opposition to Sanders will overall be both less open and less violent, yet possibly even more entrenched than the RNC deal. There's a good, at least 1/4-1/3 of the party that DOES NOT WANT SANDERS AT ANY COST (at least any closed cost; openly its 'lalala we'll take any good candidate!'). Sanders now has the ears and support of 1/4-1/3 of the party himself. So its up to convincing the remaining 1/3-1/2 and Sanders is still on the upwards about that. I fully admit this could change and could change soon, and Clinton would be the winner.

by Anonymousreply 131February 19, 2016 4:14 PM

caucuses need to be stopped. it's just mob mentality. we all know it.

by Anonymousreply 132February 19, 2016 4:16 PM

R130 Sanders was up during Iowa until past 4am due to watching the super tight process there, then a couple days later (tops) had Town Hall then Debate then New Hampshire. If he looked tired that week he damn well was tired. For example. I'm sure Clinton was lacking sleep too, I just know that there's proof Sanders was up that specifically late. I'm 26 and I am already screwed for at least 1, maybe 2 days if I stay up that late, even if sleeping until maybe noon afterwards.

by Anonymousreply 133February 19, 2016 4:18 PM

She's slated to get the popular vote too, according to Nate Silver, R132.

by Anonymousreply 134February 19, 2016 4:19 PM

Wow. I've only ever blocked posters on this thread for misogyny, not for being Sanders supporters. Yet I can't see any posts from 127 to 131. That says something.

by Anonymousreply 135February 19, 2016 4:21 PM

i don't care about who wins when it comes to the idea of caucuses . i hate them in general. they're bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 136February 19, 2016 4:22 PM

[quote] Wow. I've only ever blocked posters on this thread for misogyny, not for being Sanders supporters. Yet I can't see any posts from 127 to 131. That says something.

Yeah, it says something. It says that you define "misogyny" as anything that is even remotely critical of Hillary or the way she has run her campaign. (I don't know why I'm replying since you won't see this reply.)

by Anonymousreply 137February 19, 2016 4:34 PM

New York City offered free college tuition to its brightest pupils beginning in 1847, it was gradually expanded until in 1970 they made it free to all high school graduates. The city's finances then crashed owing to recession and the feds made them get rid of it in 1976. But for over 120 non-socialist years, six generations, it was a source of competitive advantage for New York City and upward mobility for immigrants. If you want to know why Jews are so educated and wealthy today as a group, the reason is most got free education at CCNY.

by Anonymousreply 138February 19, 2016 4:44 PM

R137, there are none so blind as those who will not see. And I'm looking at you. If you have any legitimate criticisms of Hillary, you can couch them in non-sexist, non-misogynistic terms you know. Well, apparently you DON'T know.

by Anonymousreply 139February 19, 2016 4:59 PM

What r139 said.

by Anonymousreply 140February 19, 2016 5:02 PM

[quote] If you have any legitimate criticisms of Hillary, you can couch them in non-sexist, non-misogynistic terms you know.

Which is exactly what I've done.

by Anonymousreply 141February 19, 2016 5:26 PM

If Bernie wins Nevada he puts off his presidential death knell for a little while longer. If he loses, he's dead.

I'm glad Bernie has lots of young progressives excited, and has older white liberals fired up. But I'm afraid they're just setting themselves up for disappointment.

by Anonymousreply 142February 19, 2016 5:30 PM

r130 is just asking for a friend;) (cough, cough,)

by Anonymousreply 143February 19, 2016 5:38 PM

You forgot EAT THE RICH!, r76. But not the help. Mexican gives me heartburn.

by Anonymousreply 144February 19, 2016 5:49 PM

[quote] [R137], there are none so blind as those who will not see. And I'm looking at you. If you have any legitimate criticisms of Hillary, you can couch them in non-sexist, non-misogynistic terms you know. Well, apparently you DON'T know.

OK, here are all of my posts. perhaps you can tell me which ones are misogynistic and why.

[quote] Citing polls that were done months ago or even weeks ago is irrelevant. There were polls in the fall that had Hillary ahead by 40 points in Iowa. Until we get more recent polls and the candidates start actively campaigning in other states we don't know where the race really stands in those states.

[quote] You're correct. The Culinary Union isn't endorsing. Either [R16] is just making shit up, or in his/her delusional mind, everyone is endorsing Hillary.

[quote] That'll be hard, considering that the Nevada caucus comes a week before the SC primary.

[quote] Nope. The new CNN poll has her ahead by only 1 point in Nevada.

[quote] How do the candidates do it? Hillary and Bernie are both old, and they have to maintain a grueling schedule for months on end with no days off. When they're on the campaign trail, they're eating crappy food and exposed to all sorts of germs, and they have to talk all day long. They appear on the morning news shows and the evening news shows too. They can't be getting more than 4 or 5 hours of sleep at night. What would happen if one of them got very ill and had to miss a whole week or two of campaigning and debates? Do they have access to some special top-secret miracle drugs that keep them going?

by Anonymousreply 145February 19, 2016 5:49 PM

I predict Hillary will win Nevada. But it will be close. Nevada is a caucus state so both of them will walk away with a healthy share of Delegates. (Like Iowa.)

by Anonymousreply 146February 19, 2016 6:24 PM

Salon strikes now...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 147February 19, 2016 7:05 PM

r147 = freeper fundie cunt

by Anonymousreply 148February 19, 2016 7:09 PM

DLs will be out on the streets perpetrating ageist hate crimes against Millennials.

by Anonymousreply 149February 19, 2016 7:29 PM

It's looking like Bernie won't win NV.

by Anonymousreply 150February 19, 2016 7:39 PM

link please, r150.

by Anonymousreply 151February 19, 2016 7:40 PM

Not me, r149. I will be right there with them tamping down my sorrow with a pipeful of 420 and oodles of Cheez Doodles. And maybe some Ho Ho's.

by Anonymousreply 152February 19, 2016 7:47 PM

Yes, R151, link please!

by Anonymousreply 153February 19, 2016 7:47 PM

You first, r153.

by Anonymousreply 154February 19, 2016 7:49 PM

There's not a lot of reporting about Nevada because it's going to be a blow-out.

by Anonymousreply 155February 19, 2016 7:57 PM

Link, R155?

by Anonymousreply 156February 19, 2016 7:57 PM

Link to the link, r156?

by Anonymousreply 157February 19, 2016 8:01 PM

Aye, yi, yi. Get a room you two!

by Anonymousreply 158February 19, 2016 8:02 PM

Chloe Grace Moretz is in Nevada campaigning for Hillary. Her victory is assured now!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 159February 19, 2016 8:18 PM

By the way, the linked article says Chloe is most famous for the romantic movie "If I Stay" but we all know what she's REALLY most famous for....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 160February 19, 2016 8:21 PM

Bernie is going to do better than expected in caucus states because his supporters are more willing to take the time - it's one thing to cast a ballot; it takes a lot more effort to caucus. But that same fervor does not mean more votes in other states. Clinton is doing fine - if she starts to slip, Obama will endorse. And then that's game-set-match.

by Anonymousreply 161February 19, 2016 8:30 PM

[Quote] Bernie is going to do better than expected in caucus states

Yes because because mob rules.

by Anonymousreply 162February 19, 2016 8:43 PM

^^^^^^because of the wonderful things he does!!!!

by Anonymousreply 163February 19, 2016 8:44 PM

"Weeeee're ... off the see the lizard ..."

by Anonymousreply 164February 19, 2016 8:59 PM

R161 That would come off as incredibly desperate of her, honestly. Presidents 'don't' endorse.

by Anonymousreply 165February 19, 2016 9:03 PM

Bernie's brother is also an asshole.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 166February 19, 2016 9:27 PM

Yep r163. You're right.

He's sooooo wonderful, he put his 1st wife's name down as the mother of his child on the child's birth certificate.

Now let's see, how does this go? Oh that's right. HE DIVORCED HIS FIRST WIFE IN '64. His son was born in '69.

He's great. A pillar of the community that one.

by Anonymousreply 167February 19, 2016 10:34 PM

[quote] Not me, [R149]. I will be right there with them tamping down my sorrow with a pipeful of 420 and oodles of Cheez Doodles. And maybe some Ho Ho's.

No, you won't, honey, because polls do not show a Clinton advantage, which is awful because all primary polls so far have overestimated Clinton's performance. She's gonna lose, and lose badly. Make sure not to let get in the way of how you treat Millennials in your life; they're people, too.

by Anonymousreply 168February 19, 2016 11:47 PM

Bernie's support base is millennials. They are notorious for not bothering to get themselves to the polls. Hillary will win.

by Anonymousreply 169February 20, 2016 2:44 AM

"I love the smell of fear in the morning".. Bernie Sanders

by Anonymousreply 170February 20, 2016 2:45 AM

HILLARY is going nowhere but straight to the win!

by Anonymousreply 171February 20, 2016 3:18 AM

Las Vegaso pleaso voto foro Bernieo Sanderso.

Honesto

integrito

Progressivo

Marchedo witho Martin Luther Kingo

by Anonymousreply 172February 20, 2016 3:22 AM

The latest from Nate Silver: 72% chance of a Clinton win in Nevada today.

by Anonymousreply 173February 20, 2016 12:28 PM

Hillary is the only one for gay rights/marriage. All the others, including that asshole Rubio, are for marriage between a man and a woman only.

by Anonymousreply 174February 20, 2016 12:38 PM

Is Nevada today (Saturday), for both parties?

by Anonymousreply 175February 20, 2016 12:42 PM

Yes it is r175, apparently the republicans plan to vote today AND Tuesday their actual caucus.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 176February 20, 2016 1:34 PM

Bernie's ancient death-cough spasms tend to come on live television debates with Hillary.

And the social-media world notices, even if some of his supporters do not.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 177February 20, 2016 2:31 PM

R126, R127, I have stayed in bed this entire week and I still can't shake my hacking cough. It's given me a bad case of laryngitis so it's not just the cold weather that causes the problem. I always get a flu shot but that doesn't prevent all strains of viral infections. So many others who live in warm climates are also fighting the same symptoms.

by Anonymousreply 178February 20, 2016 2:42 PM

[quote][R161] That would come off as incredibly desperate of her, honestly. Presidents 'don't' endorse.

You, perhaps, are too young to remember President Bill Clinton endorsing Al Gore in December 1999, over Bill Bradley, during the 2000 Democratic primaries. Or, perhaps, you are just talking out of your ass again.

FYI, sometimes a sitting President will endorse a primary leader once a delegate win is locked up.

by Anonymousreply 179February 20, 2016 2:43 PM

R177 that is known as the "campaign death rattle".

by Anonymousreply 180February 20, 2016 2:50 PM

R175, Only the Democratic Caucus is today between 10 am and noon. The very Orthodox Jewish owner of the Venetian and Palazzo casinos fought to avoid having the Republican Caucus held on Saturday, even donating the facilities of a private school in Summerlin. Republican hospitality, restaurant, and retail business owners saw the practicality of a caucus on a different day and time. How many wealthy and/or retired solid Republicans want to get up early on a Sat morning just to go to a Caucus? That takes real dedication especially from lawyers and doctors who work more than 40 hours a week.

by Anonymousreply 181February 20, 2016 2:52 PM

R181 what about those working 40 hours +++ millennials LOL

by Anonymousreply 182February 20, 2016 2:56 PM

HILLARY's gonna WIN NV

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 183February 20, 2016 3:00 PM

[quote]The very Orthodox Jewish owner of the Venetian and Palazzo casinos

Not words one reads often.

by Anonymousreply 184February 20, 2016 3:41 PM

OP, question for you: If Hillary wins NV, then is Bernie done?

by Anonymousreply 185February 20, 2016 3:46 PM

Last night I was watching MSNBC. Chris Hayes who is such an annoying little pipsqueak was interviewing a Hispanic Congressman who is supporting Hillary. He interrupted him continually, trying to spin anything positive the guy said about Hillary into a negative. Then he interviewed generic Hispanic woman supporting Bernie. He let her ramble on and on, encouraging her every step of the way.

MSNBC is in the bag for Bernie Sanders and you have to wonder why. Millennials may not have the sense to know Bernie could never win a general election, but the higher ups do. Why are they Bernie's campaign managers? Do they want the Dems to be defeated? Maybe it would help their appallingly low ratings to be the voice of the opposition.

by Anonymousreply 186February 20, 2016 4:03 PM

"Generic voters" are of no concern to moi.

by Anonymousreply 187February 20, 2016 4:07 PM

[quote]was interviewing a Hispanic Congressman

That guy was hot

by Anonymousreply 188February 20, 2016 4:09 PM

[Bold] TONS OF FREEPER FUNDIE CUNTS TROLLING AS BERNIEBROS HERE. PLEASE SEE PAST THESE ANTI - HILLARY POSTS, PEOPLE!!! FFC'S WANT YOU TO DO THEIR DIRTY WORK FOR THE REPUBLICKCUNTS!!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 189February 20, 2016 4:25 PM

I plan on caucusing for Hillary today - I am also going to attend her rally at Caesars Palace - Hillary and Bill both be in attendance - Event begins at 1:30PM

by Anonymousreply 190February 20, 2016 4:34 PM

CAPS = SHE'S GONNA LOSE AGAIN

by Anonymousreply 191February 20, 2016 4:35 PM

[Bold] r191 = FREEPER FUNDIE CUNT BI-POLAR MENTAL CASE WHO TAKE AFTER HIS TJ DONKEY SHOW WHORE MOTHER.

by Anonymousreply 192February 20, 2016 4:38 PM

I don't understand why we are having this conversation . . . the exact same one we had 8 years, except against a much weaker opponent this time. Has she learned nothing from her last run?

She's running against a Jewish, socialist, atheistic, geriatric, and yet she still can't seal the deal. Is no one asking why?

by Anonymousreply 193February 20, 2016 5:00 PM

I want to drive to Nevada so I can meet Hillary and Bill

by Anonymousreply 194February 20, 2016 5:06 PM

R181, Yes Sherman Adelson who owns the Veneitian and Palazzo Casinos is a very observant Orthodox Jew. Mr. Steve Wynn who owns Wynn and Encore Casinos is well-know to be a secular Jew and usually backs a completely different Republican candidate from Adelson. The competition and dislike between the two are legendary in Vegas. Then there is the active Republican stronghold that is the LDS Church and their members who are always urged to actively participate in the electoral process.

Of course there are also the wealthy Republican business leaders and donors who are more practical in their choices as their goal has always been a very strong US economy with steady growth. Siding with Mr. Steve Wynn they would not want to back anyone who might possibly negatively affect the tourist dependent economy by being too far to the Right.

by Anonymousreply 195February 20, 2016 5:14 PM

R193... dunno. Maybe it's because she's a woman and we've only had, like, 3 or 4 woman Presidents so far so people obviously prefer men in the job. Those women just aren't qualified.

by Anonymousreply 196February 20, 2016 5:16 PM

If anti-female animus is the only thing holding Clinton back, let's hope it gets cleared up in time for the general, R196.

by Anonymousreply 197February 20, 2016 6:27 PM

[quote]She's running against a Jewish, socialist, atheistic, geriatric, and yet she still can't seal the deal.

There have been a total of TWO primaries, one of which she won. What "deal" is she supposed to be "sealing" this early in the process?

by Anonymousreply 198February 20, 2016 6:32 PM

Don't play coy, R198, even her campaign is surprised at the state of the race. He's nearly caught her in national polls. Will she win? Yes, but the campaign never imagined they would have to spend the time, money, and political capital at this stage in the game to beat back Sanders.

by Anonymousreply 199February 20, 2016 6:58 PM

[quote]Don't play coy, [R198], even her campaign is surprised at the state of the race. He's nearly caught her in national polls. Will she win? Yes, but the campaign never imagined they would have to spend the time, money, and political capital at this stage in the game to beat back Sanders.

That is an entirely different sentiment from "WHY CAN'T SHE SEAL THE DEAL?!?" which is an utterly ludicrous thing to say right at the start of the primary season. No one, on either side of the aisle, will be "sealing the deal" for several months.

by Anonymousreply 200February 20, 2016 7:02 PM

[quote]She's running against a Jewish, socialist, atheistic, geriatric, and yet she still can't seal the deal.

This is a primary, dear. Not a general. Dems aren't anti-Socialist or Atheist, etc. You're pretty dumb.

by Anonymousreply 201February 20, 2016 7:04 PM

[quote] Dems aren't anti-Socialist

They most certainly are. Why do you think the Clintons started the DLC in the first place? And while I won't be so classless as to call you "dumb," you're incredibly smug for someone so woefully uneducated.

by Anonymousreply 202February 20, 2016 7:09 PM

[quote]There have been a total of TWO primaries, one of which she won. What "deal" is she supposed to be "sealing" this early in the process?

She's actually won both of the delegate contests in IA and NH, which is the purpose of primaries.

People are getting excited that Free Guevara is doing better than he was when he first announced and was as unknown nationally as Martin O'Malley, Jim Webb, and Lincoln Chafee.

"He's gained 30 points since no one had ever heard of him!" Well, duh. His rise in the polls is not some big surprise or sign of defeat. It's been long expected, and is pretty welcome.

by Anonymousreply 203February 20, 2016 7:20 PM

The only " problem "with Hillary Clinton's campaign is Hillary Clinton.

by Anonymousreply 204February 20, 2016 7:25 PM

[Bold] That's sweet r204. Now back to your "FREE CANDY" little white van, dear.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 205February 20, 2016 7:28 PM

[quote] His rise in the polls is not some big surprise or sign of defeat. It's been long expected, and is pretty welcome.

Oh, please. You know damn well that's not true. Clinton's own advisers have been quoted as saying that they underestimated Sanders' strength. During the summer and fall, Nate Silver was insisting that Bernie was no threat at all. Stop pretending that everything is going exactly as Hillary had planned it all along. Her campaign had never expected Iowa to be such a tight race or for her to lose NH by such a huge margin. Will Hillary still win the nomination? Probably. But not as quickly or as smoothly as she had expected. Bernie's rise in the polls has been a surprise to nearly everyone -- maybe even to Bernie himself.

by Anonymousreply 206February 20, 2016 7:38 PM

I still think 50% of Sanders' support and 80% of his funding is courtesy of the Koch Bros.

by Anonymousreply 207February 20, 2016 7:43 PM

These Bernie fans are cute how they think this old ass elderly man has a chance becoming president.

by Anonymousreply 208February 20, 2016 7:46 PM

Since Hillary is going to win Nevada, does that mean Bernie is done?

by Anonymousreply 209February 20, 2016 9:10 PM

Well she won. And she'll win in SC.

What does Bernie do now?

by Anonymousreply 210February 20, 2016 9:20 PM

I guarantee the media will say "Hillary barely wins!" MARK MY WORDS!

by Anonymousreply 211February 20, 2016 9:24 PM

What will Bernie do?

Scream about how it's unfair, and how the oligarchy bought the votes for Hillary.

When she wins a few other states and a pattern forms, get ready for the ungracious and accusatory claims of Bernie and Larry Sanders as they try to smear Hillary in favor of Republicans.

by Anonymousreply 212February 20, 2016 9:26 PM

Bernie Sander's campaign will need to re-double efforts in South Carolina in the next week. A Hillary win 2 weeks in a row going into Super Tuesday will leave him in a bad delegate count position come March 2nd.

by Anonymousreply 213February 20, 2016 9:31 PM

You'll never know.

Mate Siver was right --

Clinton 52

Sanders 48

by Anonymousreply 214February 20, 2016 10:07 PM

They're in meltdown mode tonight at Democratic Underground!!!

by Anonymousreply 215February 20, 2016 10:10 PM

R185, "pip squeak" Chris Hayes is 6'0" and buff. FYI.

by Anonymousreply 216February 20, 2016 10:45 PM

[Quote]Still waiting for that link!

Keep waiting, R4. Keep waiting.

by Anonymousreply 217February 20, 2016 11:08 PM

I'm not sure why you misread my post as mockery r168 but I support Bernie, do not look down on Millenials, and although I am disappointed that he couldn't pull off an upset I will continue to support him and his campaign. I meant what I said. I plan on self-medicating with weed, snaks and Magic Mike XXL;)

by Anonymousreply 218February 20, 2016 11:09 PM

MSNBC is furious Hillary won. That old crone Mrs. Alan Greenspan was bitching about it and Rachel Maddow was suggesting Repugs had registered to vote for Hillary as Dems. Sure, Rachel. The GOP is dying to run against Hillary and not against former Stalinist and atheist, Jewish, 75 year old Bernie. Sure.

Is Maddow an idiot or what? Stupid cow. She just reinforces my belief that women hate other powerful women. Rachel may be a lesbian, but when it comes to this she's just your typical jealous woman.

by Anonymousreply 219February 20, 2016 11:23 PM

R219, the parts of Nevada Bernie carried are Republican parts of the state. Northern Nevada is heavily Republican, southern Nevada is where most Democrats live. Hillary won the south.

So it appears that Republicans may have registered as Democrats to vote for Bernie.

by Anonymousreply 220February 20, 2016 11:30 PM

R220 tell Maddow. She's an idiot. Mrs. Alan Greenspan was claiming that the union leaders forced their poor little underlings to vote for Hillary.

by Anonymousreply 221February 20, 2016 11:32 PM

[Quote] So it appears that Republicans may have registered as Democrats to vote for Bernie.

[Bold] EXACTLY!!!!!!! THE REPUBLICKCUNT TRICK!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 222February 20, 2016 11:32 PM

The last I heard, the union leadership was endorsing Hillary, but many of the young blue collar union workers were voting for Bernie.

There are some years where the union leadership will have a lot of influence, this year not as much. A lot of union workers in Las Vegas are Mexican American or Mexican.

by Anonymousreply 223February 20, 2016 11:41 PM

Picture it. Nevada, 2008.

Dark blue is Obama. Light blue is Clinton.

Look familiar?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 224February 20, 2016 11:48 PM

2008 general election Nevada:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 225February 21, 2016 1:07 AM

HA HA HA socialist Sander lovers!!!

by Anonymousreply 226February 21, 2016 1:11 AM

[quote] Is Maddow an idiot or what? Stupid cow. She just reinforces my belief that women hate other powerful women.

Nothing sexist about that! I guess it's OK to call a woman a "cow," as long as it's Rachel Maddow. It's not like Rachel has ever done anything good. Let's throw Rachel under the bus.

by Anonymousreply 227February 21, 2016 1:15 AM

Rachel is throwing herself under the bus with her recent reporting about the Clintons.

Talk to the hand with assigning blame to others.

by Anonymousreply 228February 21, 2016 1:24 AM

[Bold] Maddow is a fucking asshole who HATES other powerful women. TRUTH!!!

by Anonymousreply 229February 21, 2016 1:30 AM

My mom, a die-hard Faux News fan has been telling me daily she's voting for Bernie, joking of course but acting like she's serious. I think that repubs think he is the perfect candidate for them to beat in November. And somehow Faux has sublimally put this talking point into their viewers heads.

by Anonymousreply 230February 21, 2016 1:31 AM

r230, wow you think Dems are stupid

by Anonymousreply 231February 21, 2016 1:35 AM

Hillary is an upstanding, principled leader who has survived the most intrusive, invasive, aggressive and unending vetting process in political history. Time and again, she has emerged with her integrity intact.

by Anonymousreply 232February 21, 2016 2:01 AM

To the BernBros: If you're mad now, are your heads gonna explode next Saturday when HRC wins by double digits?

Face it: He will bow out by this time next month when her DELEGATE COUNT is insurmountable. The superdelegates are not moving one inch towards Sanders.

by Anonymousreply 233February 21, 2016 2:14 AM

Obviously not since thee is now an official with Obama, Warren and Castro standing Obama and warren are endorsing her.

by Anonymousreply 234February 21, 2016 2:18 AM

There is a reason Warren hasn't endorsed anyone. Can you think what it might be?

by Anonymousreply 235February 21, 2016 2:22 AM

She and Bernie are alike with the income inequality and fighting wall street and she doesn't want to upset his supporters but she knows that because of the issues of foreign policy she is behind Clinton. So she is going to wait for him to suspend campaign and then she will work with the democrats to get them to move towards Clinton.

by Anonymousreply 236February 21, 2016 2:28 AM

I don't know. What do you think it is. I'm sorry everyone but I haven't slept in about 50 hours my typing is atrocious and can I am barely functioning. I am a life long insomniac and then the second night I got all into this election and forgot to go to bed. Now i am just trying to stay awake long enough so I don't get my sleeping schedule off. I usually use weed for it but lately have been using copious amounts and am taking a tolerance break.

by Anonymousreply 237February 21, 2016 2:31 AM

So winning 7 out of 7 in a tie breaker is normal right? RIGHT?

by Anonymousreply 238February 21, 2016 2:38 AM

winning 7 out of 7 what?

by Anonymousreply 239February 21, 2016 2:41 AM

WILBURRRRR! GET THE AXE!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 240February 21, 2016 2:43 AM

I am not sleeping I can only post after I leave the page and come back. I'm not a paid member.

by Anonymousreply 241February 21, 2016 2:48 AM

It's amusing that the Hill Shills are crowing about these pathetically small "landslide" margins of their candidate. All it demonstrates to any savy politico is how bloody weak a candidate Hillary is. She has spent the last seven years polling, researching,triangulating,fund - raising millions of dollars, lining up establishment endorsements and 5.3 points is the best she can do? This is Hill's best shot? Good luck she'll need it.

by Anonymousreply 242February 21, 2016 2:57 AM

(rolling eyes at R242)

Spin, little Berniebro, Spin!

by Anonymousreply 243February 21, 2016 3:01 AM

for r242 who brought up a term previously unused anywhere, please enjoy!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 244February 21, 2016 3:04 AM

Trump will never beat her. After they start campaigning he will mess up and the everyone will turn. All Dean had to do was yell and make a funny face. Their are a lot of middle of the road voters that wouldn't vote for a far left or far right candidate. There are 7 swing states that will vote either way and mostly a little right of center. Trump will never win.

by Anonymousreply 245February 21, 2016 3:08 AM

who ever get the individual swing state that candidate will take those states delegates. So if Hills will say 4 states she will win those delegates. He would win the rest.

by Anonymousreply 246February 21, 2016 3:13 AM

Holy shit did I really just type that mess. Thank you for your patience but I need to stop typing. Have a good night everyone.

by Anonymousreply 247February 21, 2016 3:17 AM

Nighty night, R247! Go to bed!

by Anonymousreply 248February 21, 2016 3:20 AM

R245 Trump has been "messing up" for the last months it doesn't appear to have hurt him . It actually appears to have garnered him more votes. Trump knows his base and wins it easily. Hill's "base" is senior citizens with net worth over 200K. Which means in Nov Trump will be POTUS and Mrs Clinton will be mayor of Boca Raton.

by Anonymousreply 249February 21, 2016 3:21 AM

Trump is actually pretty much unstoppable.

by Anonymousreply 250February 21, 2016 3:35 AM

Yup. The people on board with Trump are all idiots who will follow him no matter what he does and will jump on every little thing Hillary does.

If Trump has kept this following this long, with all the stupid shit he's said and done, it's obvious that he can't fuck up big enough to be stopped.

by Anonymousreply 251February 21, 2016 3:41 AM

The wings of Icarus will melt.

by Anonymousreply 252February 21, 2016 3:45 AM

Trumps followers don't care about facts. I saw part of his speech. The crowd was cheering various statements he made. He said, "and who's going to pay for the wall?" They screamed as one, "Mexico!"

by Anonymousreply 253February 21, 2016 3:51 AM

Don't got wings.. got a world class 737 turbo jet with wet bar an jaccuzzi, Got my name on the side. Ya LOSER

by Anonymousreply 254February 21, 2016 3:51 AM

Trump just won Republican veterans after (correctly) calling the Iraq war a total waste that GWB lied about to enter. He head on challenged Republican orthodoxy, not to mention the Pope, Fox News, and Apple. He attacks sacred cows and gets away with it. I think he will do very well in the rust belt as well as the south.

by Anonymousreply 255February 21, 2016 3:56 AM

Trump = emotional, messy and a bully, Clinton = robotic, plodding, an old biddy, who do YOU think is right for the madness of 2016???????????

by Anonymousreply 256February 21, 2016 4:25 AM

No straight white male over thirty will touch Hillary with a ten foot poll. Trust me.

by Anonymousreply 257February 21, 2016 4:30 AM

[quote]Trump just won Republican veterans after (correctly) calling the Iraq war a total waste that GWB lied about to enter.

Except he didn't win them. 64% of S.C. Republican veterans voted for not-Trump.

by Anonymousreply 258February 21, 2016 4:30 AM

R242 a win is a win...1st place is 1 place not second or third fucker...it just doesn't matter you HILLARY Hater just watch her win the nomination and election!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 259February 21, 2016 4:35 AM

R249 so not true...and btw, who are you voting for? As for tonight, SHE WON!

by Anonymousreply 260February 21, 2016 4:40 AM

In a FPTP system, "won" means got the most votes. Don't be pedantic, R258.

by Anonymousreply 261February 21, 2016 4:46 AM

Oh, he won the primary, no doubt, r261. But, you were making a point about veterans that is not supported by the data, so I just wanted to point that out.

by Anonymousreply 262February 21, 2016 4:50 AM

She's pretty much unstoppable now but Sanders will run it out as far as he can because, well, ego.

Another interesting phenomenon may be bubbling up. Sanders' supports are getting very nasty and engaging in their own form of the shenanigans they deplore. Some of my older friends on Facebook have pulled back. They are having trouble swallowing some of Senator Sanders' proposals. They are disturbed by the mob rule fanaticism. They are realizing that "Democratic socialism" is really "Socialism". And they all want to reduce income inequality. But if you probe a bit, you'll find that they are not for wealth or income redistribution. It's finally dawning on them that, yeah, basically, that's what this is all about. Everyone says they want change but...well, you get the drift.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 263February 21, 2016 5:58 AM

[quote] Another interesting phenomenon may be bubbling up. Sanders' supports are getting very nasty and engaging in their own form of the shenanigans they deplore. Some of my older friends on Facebook have pulled back.

.I'm always amazed at DataLoungers who spend all their time in their parents' basements posting on DataLounge but think they can identify "political phenomena" and take the pulse of the electorate based on reading a few of their friends' posts on Facebook.

by Anonymousreply 264February 21, 2016 6:05 AM

Here's the thing: Bernie's whole candidacy is predicated on the notion that he's exciting new voters and his ideas are driving turnout. That's been the media narrative... all the pictures of massive rallies and how so many people are turning to Bernie. His entire claim to "electability" rests on this... because GOP voters ALWAYS turn out, he's saying he'll re-invigorate Democrats and get TONS of young people to the polls, and that's how he'll beat Hillary in the primaries and the GOP in the general.

There's just one problem.

Turnout is down compared to 2008. Democratic turnout is DOWN, not up. There is no sign of these new waves of voters, or massive amounts of people that are supposed to be turning out for him. And he's lost 2 of 3 contests so far, and isn't really forecast to win any others at this point.

Where's the "revolution"? Where's the massive wave of voters whose turnout will not only sweep him into power but sweep the Republicans FROM power in Congress? It's nowhere to be seen so far...

And Bernie supporters online are just getting nastier and nastier... some overtly racist, many overtly misogynist, all attacking and shouting down and bullying anyone who doesn't share their zeal for Bernie. It's kind of disgusting.

But it really does seem like the media whipped up a narrative that has no real basis in fact... there is no real "revolution" going on. Just the same old bunch of angry people completely unwilling to put their time and effort where their mouth is.

by Anonymousreply 265February 21, 2016 6:14 AM

Someone said Sanders will win Minnesota and Vermont. How many states will vote before either one of those states again?

Like Rubio, he looks good on paper. But when people go to the polls, they want someone who will stick it to the other party plain and simple. And what either one of them is selling won't work.

by Anonymousreply 266February 21, 2016 6:28 AM

here we go...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 267February 21, 2016 6:33 AM

"I'm always amazed at DataLoungers who spend all their time in their parents' basements posting on DataLounge but think they can identify "political phenomena" and take the pulse of the electorate based on reading a few of their friends' posts on Facebook."

Of course it couldn't possible be a phenomenon.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 268February 21, 2016 7:25 AM

[quote]Like Rubio, he looks good on paper.

No, he looks terrible both in the flesh and on paper. Any traction he has is ALL hype. There is no revolution--just a few loud mouthed SJW's screeching on social media. The economic outlook is bright. Young people, the ones who are ambitious and hardworking, are finding jobs out of college (pent up demand). And most of the SJW slacker grads who are still unemployed are willfully so (not unlike their hero Bernie, who didn't even have a real job until he was 40). Last nail in the coffin....history shows young people are far too lazy and ambivalent to actually vote.

by Anonymousreply 269February 21, 2016 12:15 PM

[quote] R250: Trump is actually pretty much unstoppable.

Again with the reference to his incontenance! Enough! I think Trump has proved that he is perfectly capable of making an hour-long speach or debate performance without shitting himself onstage. It remains to be seen how much stamina he has and if he can go all day. But for now, he is perfectly stopped-up.

by Anonymousreply 270February 21, 2016 1:58 PM

Bernie's challenge has been good for Hillary. She can't be seen as having a coronation. She's also been able to stay in the center, which is where she'll need to be when the primary is over, and it's her or Trump in the general.

Trump has a loyal following of truly stupid people. Maybe 20% of the population. He'll get another 10% that hate Hillary. That leaves a landslide voting for Hillary in the general.

by Anonymousreply 271February 21, 2016 2:07 PM

Trump has that Olestra problem, though, which is why he always wears a jacket, to cover the Depends bulge.

by Anonymousreply 272February 21, 2016 2:08 PM

Well, R272, maybe it's time to elect someone whose pooper is defunct. Our politicians should be more representative of the populous in general. This could be a good thing for incontinent people everywhere.

by Anonymousreply 273February 21, 2016 2:27 PM

At my caucus location yesterday in Las Vegas a representative from National Nurses United was working the very long lines informing everyone that even if they were registered Republican they could still register as Democrat and vote for Bernie. I was truly disgusted.

During the actual caucus I was shouted down by two representatives from National Nurses United and approx 15 Bernie supporters when I questioned why the only precinct captains present represented Bernie. I was concerned that the votes would only be counted by Bernie's reps. I was screamed at and told, "You're asking stupid questions, shut up" and "You're full of shit, sit down!". I was gobsmacked by their rude behavior. All of the things I'd been reading about Bernie supporters on DL were present at the caucus yesterday.

To add insult to injury, after the votes were counted and delegates were awarded, Bernie reps attempted to take one of the Hillary's delegates from my precinct and add it on to their total. I once again spoke up and stated that if they tried to change the final tally I would be contacting the media and an attorney. Again they shouted and screamed and me and stated, "You might not want to walk to your car alone after this!".

What I witnessed yesterday left me appalled. Granted I support Hillary but if the caucus had gone Bernie's way I would have accepted it. The fact that Bernie's supporters were trying to game the system and circumvent the process left me completely turned off. After what I saw yesterday I cannot in good conscious support Bernie if he becomes the nominee. The actions I saw taken on Bernie's behalf yesterday were truly despicable and fly in the face of democracy and the principles and values he and his supporters claim to represent.

by Anonymousreply 274February 21, 2016 7:36 PM

Jesus, r274, what a nightmare. Isn't there some kind of referee at these?

by Anonymousreply 275February 21, 2016 7:40 PM

[Quote] Bernie's reps. I was screamed at and told, "You're asking stupid questions, shut up" and "You're full of shit, sit down!".

They've been doing that here for a year now.

by Anonymousreply 276February 21, 2016 7:43 PM

r275 There was a representative from the Nevada Democratic Party but she was a very frail overweight old lady that had trouble speaking. She had to use a walker to get around and was using an oxygen tank. At one point during the process Bernie supporters crowded around her and attempted to change the delegate count as I stated above. I intervened and told them they all needed to take a step back. The poor woman was almost in tears and obviously overwhelmed. After the caucus was over she thanked me for my help and said she appreciated that I was looking out for her. The fact that Bernie supporters attempted to strong-arm a frail elderly woman was beyond me. I just don't get this "win at any cost" mentality. If you are willing to step over anyone and everyone to secure a victory is it really worth it? I'm baffled by Bernie's supporters.

by Anonymousreply 277February 21, 2016 7:48 PM

r274 / r277 = NEVER HAPPENED.

by Anonymousreply 278February 21, 2016 7:52 PM

I think a lot of them are either Republicans or first time voters that lean Conservative/Independent but support Bernie.

It's pretty obvious they're Republican, but Bernie is their one exception. And Bernie seems to know it, he's using Republican talking points to attack Hillary. It's very jarring if you're used to Democratic in-party lines of attack.

I feel sorry for that elderly lady. Isn't there some Nevada election commission you can complain to?

by Anonymousreply 279February 21, 2016 7:54 PM

r278 It most certainly did happen - Believe what you want I was there. Bernie and his followers are a disgusting bunch. I wouldn't have believed what happened had I not experienced it for myself. I live in Precinct 6735.

by Anonymousreply 280February 21, 2016 7:56 PM

r278 You could also ask ther Bernie supporters for their videos - 3 Bernie supporters in my precinct recorded the entire process - More likely than not they will not be releasing these videos because they don't cast a negative light on Hillary

by Anonymousreply 281February 21, 2016 7:58 PM

r279 I'm not sure if complaining is even worth it at this point. The elderly woman overseeing my precinct suggested I volunteer next time. I truly felt sorry for her, imagine if 15+ people surrounded you and were attempting to alter delegate counts after everything has been decided. I was shocked. I stepped in because if it had been my mother or grandmother in that position I would want someone to do the same.

My precinct elected me as one of the delegates to the Clark County Democratic Convention. Hopefully that process is slightly more civil but I won't rule anything out with the Bernie supporters also participating.

by Anonymousreply 282February 21, 2016 8:03 PM

Good for you, r274. That poor lady.

by Anonymousreply 283February 21, 2016 8:07 PM

Now we know not to let Independents run on the Democratic ticket ever again. Their values lean too strong-arm Republican.

People mistakenly believed an Independent would lean Democratic in values because he voted with a Democratic bloc. Instead, he's trying to tear the party's credibility apart from the inside. It's like being attacked from within by a parastite.

by Anonymousreply 284February 21, 2016 8:19 PM

[quote] Now we know not to let Independents run on the Democratic ticket ever again. Their values lean too strong-arm Republican.

So now Bernie is too Republican? I thought he was too left-wing socialist? Now he's also too Republican? I can't keep up with it all. All I know is that based on DL posts, Bernie is truly the most vile, horrible man to ever walk the earth. Right up there with Hitler. Same for all of his supporters.

by Anonymousreply 285February 21, 2016 8:32 PM

r285 = The dumbest of dumb.

No, I won't spell it out for you. I'm sure your Mommy and Daddy will clue you in. DUH!

by Anonymousreply 286February 21, 2016 8:36 PM

[quote] I'm sure your Mommy and Daddy will clue you in. DUH!

Well, I guess I can't be a genius like you. After all, I'm a Bernie supporter, so I must be a 20-year-old Republican idiot.

by Anonymousreply 287February 21, 2016 8:46 PM

r287 = fucktard

by Anonymousreply 288February 21, 2016 8:57 PM

r274=What a story! Everything but the hounds snappin at her rear end. Talk some more r274. We don't get too many good talkers here.

by Anonymousreply 289February 21, 2016 10:34 PM

R274 that is some story and it is really true...get an attorney and share it with the local-network news...this is newsworthy!!! Fuck Bernnie BURN!!!!!!!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 290February 22, 2016 2:24 AM

R274 You should also share your story with the Sanders Campaign, I can not imagine that is the behavior they want.

by Anonymousreply 291February 22, 2016 2:34 AM

After the way the BernBros treated the legendary Delores Huerta -English only my ass Trump wannabes- this behavior doesn't surprise me. These so called Democrats are animals. Symone and Tad can't dance on a pinhead fast enough.

BTW notice Bernie has already written South Carolina off. Keep this in mind March 1st.

by Anonymousreply 292February 22, 2016 5:08 AM

[quote] It's amusing that the Hill Shills are crowing about these pathetically small "landslide" margins of their candidate. All it demonstrates to any savy politico is how bloody weak a candidate Hillary is. She has spent the last seven years polling, researching,triangulating,fund - - raising millions of dollars, lining up establishment endorsements and 5.3 points is the best she can do? This is Hill's best shot? Good luck she'll need it.

Haha. Don't you look stupid a week later.

by Anonymousreply 293February 28, 2016 12:02 PM

NYTimes is throwing massive power against Hillary, she's toast. Over.

by Anonymousreply 294February 29, 2016 6:37 AM

HILLARY won NV and this Tuesday will really show Bernie who's the boss lady....then...Feel the BURN Bern! NY Times Eh who cares about that powerless threat!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 295February 29, 2016 6:48 AM

The Hillary hate is about as rational and well founded as the Obama Hate.

As in, "not at all".

by Anonymousreply 296February 29, 2016 7:10 AM

Hillary will clean up on Super-Tuesday. But Bernie will soldier on, convinced that he's best chances for winning are in later contests. The only question is how much longer past Super-Tuesday he'll last. Will he go to the end, like Hillary did in 2008? Or will he concede prior to that?

I hope he shows more class in his speech at the Convention than he did in his speech after losing South Carolina.

by Anonymousreply 297February 29, 2016 7:33 AM

He will lose, but I suspect he will try to continue as you suggest, but the real question is, how quickly the money an effort will dry up once the Millennials realize they are not going to get their way. They are selfish and fickle, just watch, they will drop him like yesterdays abercrombie and fitch t-shirt. He wont have the money to go all the way.

by Anonymousreply 298February 29, 2016 7:41 AM

[quote] how quickly the money an effort will dry up once the Millennials realize they are not going to get their way.

Are you crazy? That's not going to happen. Ever. Bernie has masterfully got Milennials where he wants them. He'll just convince them that it's never over and he can still wrangle the nom AND the Presidency.. all they have to do is just send in a few more dollars!

by Anonymousreply 299February 29, 2016 7:47 AM

Why is the NYT hitting Clinton so hard when they endorsed her? They know something we don't. They just can't prove it. Yet. Somewhere out there is a recording of one of those Goldman Sachs talks and it's only a matter of time before it is made public. An October surprise in March? I think Bernie is going to go as long as he can without looking like a sore loser. The longer he stays in the race the longer he keeps her honest. She's made a lot of promises and compromises to left leaning progressives and she's going to be held to her word.

by Anonymousreply 300February 29, 2016 8:11 AM

Link please. I didn't see anything bad about Hillary today. Just an article about how she's getting all the endorsements and Bernie isn't.

Also, another about polls being inaccurate, but I don't have a subscription so what's that about?

by Anonymousreply 301February 29, 2016 2:59 PM

Tomorrow is super Tuesday ... and Hillary is poised to leave Bernie in the dust.

by Anonymousreply 302February 29, 2016 9:35 PM

R301, Are you referring to this article from the NYT about the Mid East mess?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 303February 29, 2016 10:01 PM

The article I saw particularly had the word "endorsements" in the title. It was about political endorsements, specifically which candidate Senators were endorsing. Hillary.

I don't know what article the earlier poster, R300 is referring to.

by Anonymousreply 304February 29, 2016 10:45 PM

R294 explain...how?

by Anonymousreply 305March 1, 2016 2:38 AM

R305 there's no explanation. That person was posting the same shit over and over in every thread but wouldn't/couldn't link to anything. Just someone pathetically trying to start something.

by Anonymousreply 306March 1, 2016 2:49 AM

r303 posted to the articles r294 was referring to. I read them as well. Why are you trying so hard to discredit posters who don't believe she walks on water, r306? She's set to clean Bernie's clock according to most polls. Yet her followers are hell bent on alienating his supporters. When Trump wins due to low voter turn-out you jerks will blame Bernie.

by Anonymousreply 307March 1, 2016 6:07 AM

The only people hell-bent on alienating supporters are the BernieBots. Holy crap.

And yeah, if trump wins due to low voter turnout, I WILL blame Bernie Voters... because THEY are the ones saying they won't vote for Hillary if she wins the nomination. There reverse simply isn't true... there aren't any Hillary supporters saying they'll refuse to vote for Bernie. There's no #HillaryOrBust hashtag on twitter. Just a #BernieOrBust.

It's amazing how completely backwards and wrong and oblivious so many Bernie supporters are to their own behavior and their own side's behavior.

by Anonymousreply 308March 1, 2016 9:07 PM

Hillary supporters want to beat Republicans.

Bernie supporters only want to beat Hillary, and as long as they do that, they don't give a rats ass if Republicans actually take over everything. In fact, their attitude is "IT'LL SERVE YOU RIGHT FOR NOT BELIEVING EXACTLY AS I DO". Such childish, petulant, selfish, self-destructive people.

We need adults in the room, and BernieBots are not it.

by Anonymousreply 309March 1, 2016 9:09 PM

But wait. I thought r294 was just talking shit. Did any of you even bother to read the NYT articles in r303's link? Or is it just deflect, misdirect and when all else fails blame that vast right-wing conspiracy. And now you have a new villain to blame. The Democratic Socialist! and his Millenial Minions who won't get with the program. She took that victory lap waaay too soon, Sid Blumenthal. And now she's going to be president and she's going to have to deal head-on with the mess she helped to create. Or do you think Trump is just going to focus on Bill's doggery and her looks? Be careful what you wish for bitches.

by Anonymousreply 310March 1, 2016 9:49 PM

These old threads have gems like R71. Unfortunately they were always maligned and called names and demeaned.

by Anonymousreply 311January 29, 2020 3:50 AM

This is hilarious in hindsight.

Hillary won Nevada and Bernie withheld support and MI, WI, OH and PA voted for Trump by the thinnest of threads.

Bernie got his revenge.

He needs to go away.

by Anonymousreply 312January 29, 2020 3:52 AM

25% of Bernie's supporters didn't vote for her in the general. I look forward to joining them in spirit should Bernie get the nomination.

by Anonymousreply 313January 29, 2020 3:56 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!