Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Soldier who made shocking allegations about Princess Diana's death flees the UK!

The SAS soldier who made astonishing claims Princess Diana was murdered by special forces has apparently fled Britain just days before he is set to be questioned by police.

The former sniper, known only as soldier N, is said to have left the country as Scotland Yard launches a new investigation into the Princess' death.

He allegedly told his wife that a member of an elite unit shone a light in her chauffeur's face causing him to crash in August 1997.

The wife claimed her husband had told her the 'hit' had been instructed by someone in the royal inner circle because they did not approve of Diana's relationship with Fayed.

Soldier N was due to meet Scotland Yard's DCI Philip Easton but is understood to have left the country on Monday or Tuesday.

A source close to the investigation told The Sunday People: 'Soldier N is key to this inquiry as he is the person who made the claims about Diana's murder.

'Pressure on him has been mounting since the original story broke last month. He was aware police wanted to interview him.'

It is thought Soldier N may be have travelled to the United Arab Emirates while his partner and her children are still at their home in Hereford.

Scotland Yard reportedly decided to review the case, 16 years after Diana's death in a Paris underpass, after interviewing the woman who insists her former husband's claims were true.

She alleged a white car and motorbike were involved in the plot which enlisted the services of one of Soldier N's former SAS colleagues.

When asked by officers why she hadn't reported her husband's theory earlier the woman said she had been sworn to secrecy.

In a dramatic twist, the investigation could also unearth recordings of the crash after security experts revealed Diana's phone was bugged.

Soldier N is also alleged to have stolen money while serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Claims: Soldier N allegedly told his wife about the 'hit' after he had taken Prince William on an advanced driving course in 2008

His wife reportedly told officers that when he returned from a tour of duty in Iraq in 2004, she was asked to pay 13,000 Iraqi dinars (around £7,000) into his personal bank account.

The conversation took place in 2011 but the couple have since separated. When the woman quizzed her husband about his theory he reportedly told her the SAS had been following Diana and Dodi Al Fayed, who was also killed in the accident.

The forthcoming investigation, which was prompted by the claims, will look into allegations from a source in the UK security industry that GCHQ was remotely taping Diana and Dodi up until the moment of the crash.

A source told a national newspaper said Diana was a prime intelligence target, GCHQ operatives 'would have wanted and had the capacity to listen live to the conversations in the car as it sped away from the Ritz.'.

At the time IRA terrorists were driving vehicles packed with explosives around the UK in plots to blow up city centres - and senior military commanders had to find a way to thwart them.

One source said: 'The SAS had to develop a series of tactics for every eventuality. In the 1980s the IRA were driving bombs to targets around Britain.'

Diana, 36, Fayed, 42, and their driver Henri Paul, 41, were killed in the crash in 1997. The Princess' bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones was seriously injured.

Al Fayed's father, Mohammed Al Fayed has always asserted the pair's deaths were the result of a planned murder at the hands of the British Establishment and MI6, and similarly claims a white Fiat was involved in the crash but has never been traced.

by Anonymousreply 4809/24/2013

It's all nonsense.

Even if it were true, how could any perpetrator be assured that this plot would result in her death? Many people survive auto accidents.

by Anonymousreply 109/22/2013

You know nothing, R1

by Anonymousreply 209/22/2013

And really, aren't traffic tunnels generally lit up like an operating room at night? Hardly wonder what an additional light might have accomplished.

by Anonymousreply 309/22/2013

Soldier N...you in danger, girl!

by Anonymousreply 409/22/2013

I'm confused about the light and how it would assure death as well. Can someone explain?

by Anonymousreply 509/22/2013

R5, I don't think it was a flashlight, but more like a laser. A laser pointer on the ground can blind a pilot of an a airplane.

by Anonymousreply 609/22/2013

Thanks R6.. so the laser would have to be planted? How do they ensure that the French investigators or police don't find or publicise it?

by Anonymousreply 709/22/2013

My thought was how would another car be able to precicely target Diana's driver if they were driving at such a high rate of speed. Wouldn't other drivers notice the flash of light?

Why didn't Diana buckle up if she was concerned for her life? Didn't she mention in an interview that she felt there was a hit on her life and it would be in the form of an automobile accident?

Indeed it seems like there would be easier ways to assign ate someone.

by Anonymousreply 809/22/2013

I'm sorry, the logistics of pulling anything as random as this off are not possible. Who knew what route the driver was going to go; at any time he could have decided to take an alternate route, especially if he was being pursued. Even if the phone in the car was bugged, like what, was Diana on the phone giving explicit directions to someone of the route they were taking? Laughable to speculate. Drunk driver crashes car in tunnel at high speed. Case closed.

by Anonymousreply 909/22/2013

[quote]there would be easier ways to assign ate someone.

That's got to be autocorrect.

by Anonymousreply 1009/22/2013

R5, One of the cars following Diana's quickly flashed a high beam of light in her driver's eyes, causing him to crash into the side railing. Apparently this maneuver had been carefully rehearsed as a possible assassination attempt when there was political turmoil in Romania.

by Anonymousreply 1109/22/2013

Wasn't it a strobe from the back of a motorbike that had preceded the Mercedes into the tunnel?

by Anonymousreply 1209/22/2013

Actually it was a pillion passenger on a motorcycle that flashed the strobe light into Their driver's eyes. The white Fiat then bumped them off course towards the central pillars.

The rear seatbelts had been disabled in advance.

by Anonymousreply 1309/22/2013

the tunnel is the key. If it was a horrible accident, then that is tragic, but If it was on purpose, then a tunnel usually means that in fact there is no "alternate route".

The answers all go back to the tunnel.

by Anonymousreply 1509/22/2013

What R13 said.

by Anonymousreply 1609/22/2013

Strange that the manufacturers of the car were not allowed to examine it after the crash. Also there was some question if it really was Henri Paul's blood that had a high alcohol content or if it was "accidentally" switched in the French hospital.

by Anonymousreply 1709/22/2013

The traffic cameras were conveniently not working in the area that night, no?

by Anonymousreply 1809/22/2013

Maybe French intelligence cooperated with the British. IF true, I can't imagine MI6 being able to do it all in France without French help and pull it off.

by Anonymousreply 1909/22/2013

The ambulance sat in the tunnel for an hour and a half instead of speeding her to the hospital for treatment. They were waiting for no signs of life. The tunnel also has historical significance, a place for sacrifices.

by Anonymousreply 2009/22/2013

A traffic accident is no guarantee of death. An assassination plot as random as this wouldn't guarantee any any of the car occupant's demise. It would be the laughing stock of the assassins far and wide.

by Anonymousreply 2109/22/2013

It's obvious that the Royal family had her killed.

by Anonymousreply 2209/22/2013

You don't understand the French medical system, do you, R20?

by Anonymousreply 2309/22/2013

SAS? Is he a pilot or a flight attendant?

by Anonymousreply 2409/22/2013

"The ambulance sat in the tunnel for an hour and a half instead of speeding her to the hospital for treatment."

French treatment is different than US treatment. They do more to stabilize the patient on the scene.

by Anonymousreply 2509/22/2013

Fuck me, this again? Occam's Razor people. Drunk, driving too fast, arrogant about his skill, last minute change of plan, taunted paps to try to keep up with him, lost control in a tunnel, passengers not wearing seat belts died, passenger who was wearing seat belt lived - or convoluted assassination attempt involving several governments and unreliable tech which may or may not work, relying heavily on no-one making a mistake or talking, targets not wearing seat belts, Dodi Fayed making a last-minute change of plan to go out and that route being chosen... It's ridiculous.

She was doing such a great job of making herself a laughing stock the worst thing was for her to become a martyr figure.

Read the linked article. It is well researched and is full of stuff like provable evidence. I know that's not popular round here but try it, you might like it.

by Anonymousreply 2609/22/2013

The "French treatment" has been discredited; that is why the US has medics in the ambulance while it gets the patient to the hospital ASAP.

The delay (they didn't even go to the nearest hospital) certainly contributed to Diana's death, as did the brilliant "French treatment" of massaging her hemorrhaging chest.

by Anonymousreply 2709/22/2013

The French don't drink heavily, or at least hold their liquor like most Latins. She was assassinated.

by Anonymousreply 2809/22/2013

I bet "N" is for Nigel

by Anonymousreply 2909/22/2013

r26, some of your points are valid; some not.

For the latter: People are suggestible, and often "choose" plans that weren't their intentions. Too, Elizabeth's reaction of "So?" showed she didn't think Diana would become a "martyr."

Days before, Diana told the paparazzi that they were soon to write a big story about her. Little did she know.

by Anonymousreply 3009/22/2013

In a sense she did "know," as she got wind of a plot that meant "she was to have an accident in my car."

The documentary "An Unlawful Killing" covers this story in a way the banker/establishment/royal-sycophantic media never would, for obvious reasons.

The blood sample purported to be the driver's was taken from another person. If he'd been half as inebriated as the sample indicated, he would have been falling down, obviously drunk, which video footage of him that evening clearly contradicts.

Diana was eliminated because of the perceived threat she represented to the self-described "royals."

by Anonymousreply 3109/23/2013

R26, aren't you forgetting something?

A white car ( i think it was a fiat) bumped into Diana's car, which caused it to crash into the pillar in the tunnel.

Henry Paul's test sample could have easily been tampered with. Also, there was a large deposit of $$ into his bank account a week or 2 prior to this "accident".

This type of "accident" was in their MI5 or MI6 or whatever their version of CIA/special ops playbook.

This white car was never found.

Diana would have survived this accident if it happened in the US.

by Anonymousreply 3209/23/2013

[quote]Maybe French Intelligence cooperated with the British.

The French would have had to owe MI6 some massive favour to allow the hit in the City of Lights. How would it go? "The most notorious death since JFK in our glorious capital, rather than your own backyard of choice? Why should we host your dirty work? Not great for our image. Well - OK, but we're even now. And our people now know much more about your people."

As The Queen once said, 'There are forces at work of which we know little.'

by Anonymousreply 3309/24/2013

Hell, I'd flee too, if Prince Philip was breathing down my neck. Cue the crazy hitchhiker music from 'Carmina Burana'.....

by Anonymousreply 3409/24/2013

She really was the people's cum dumpster.

by Anonymousreply 3509/24/2013

If they wanted her dead it would have been a bomb in the car, and they would have blamed the IRA. No one in their right mind would have tried to kill her using a plan as goofy and uncertain as what you people are proposing.

by Anonymousreply 3609/24/2013

She was poisoned at the restaurant and the car crash was a diversion.

by Anonymousreply 3709/24/2013

I actually do wonder at times how people manage to function normally in society, hold down a job, have relationships, the whole thing, while being conspiracy nuts. I've only ever met one person who publicly admitted to believing Diana was murdered. Where do all you guys hang out? Is it that there are more people who believe but it's not considered socially acceptable to out yourself as a believer?

Is there a group that believes Diana was offed but JFK had only one shooter? Do the Illuminati guys look down on you? Where does the New World Order fit into all this? Is it chemtrails? Please God not the chemtrails...

by Anonymousreply 3809/24/2013

Why was there a large deposit in the driver's account?

by Anonymousreply 3909/24/2013

R38=disinformationist.

It has been 50 years since the American military killed Kennedy, twelve years since they downed the WTC. Still they think they can browbeat everyone with the sneering taunts of eight year old bullies.

by Anonymousreply 4009/24/2013

The Brits give their John Does dumb names. Baby P anyone?

by Anonymousreply 4109/24/2013

R41 Baby P wasn't a John Doe, his identity was known, the reason for using the alias was by court order to protect the identity of his siblings.

by Anonymousreply 4209/24/2013

I always thought it was very strange that 3 people (including Di's bodyguard) did not recognize that the driver was completely drunk.

by Anonymousreply 4309/24/2013

None of us know if these allegations are true or not. But, why was it so important to the royal family to KILL her? why not just cut ties? I don't understand the motive? Their relationship was already public.

by Anonymousreply 4409/24/2013

R44 = poor person from obscure family.

by Anonymousreply 4509/24/2013

r44, it was a rare moment in time when the monarchy (shedding the Fayed family, as well as ending the love for the Pakistani doctor) and govt (stopping the opposition to land mines) had converging interests that benefitted by D's death.

by Anonymousreply 4609/24/2013

R38 is actually an INformationist, not a disinformationist, but you'd have to be sane to notice that.

You unfortunate conspiracy freaks don't belong on the Datalounge. I don't know why you have been tolerated here to this point. You inject your crazy conspiracy bullshit into other threads, desperately seeking attention. I can't remember any of you identifying yourselves as gay men or discussing any topic of interest to gay men.

Your behavior is impolite and unwelcome. Please stop it immediately. Thank you.

by Anonymousreply 4709/24/2013

[QUOTE]The French don't drink heavily, or at least hold their liquor like most Latins. She was assassinated.

LOL, the French drink plenty and they're Gallic not Latin.

by Anonymousreply 4809/24/2013
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.