Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Catholics Created Enormous Cathedrals, Protestants Created Nearly Nothing. Why?

Was going through a picture book of the major cathedrals in Europe, all Catholic. And it occurred to me that the only Protestant cathedral of note that I can think or have been to are a couple in London.

Why is this?

by Anonymousreply 8808/30/2013

Great Britain has plenty of non-Catholic cathedrals.

by Anonymousreply 108/26/2013

By the start of the Reformation, most of the great cathedrals had already been built.

by Anonymousreply 208/26/2013

St. John the Divine in New York City

National Cathedral in Washington, D.C.

To have a cathedral you need a bishop. The Bishop's chair is called a cathedra, the symbol of his authority. Most Protestant sects don't have bishops. Anglicans and Lutherans do. Anglican have cathedrals. Lutherans certainly have some cathedrals in Europe. Mormons and Methodists have "bishops," but not in the sense of apostolic succession.

There are theological reasons too.

by Anonymousreply 308/26/2013

Catholicism ruled Europe during the years when most of the great cathedrals were built.

Protestantism was, in part, a reaction against the wealth and opulence of the Catholic Church. Most Protestant sects saw the expense and indulgence of a fancy cathedral as arrogant ungodliness and wasteful idolatry.

When Henry VIII broke with Rome, the Anglican Church was created to take its place. Since Henry was a Catholic at heart, the Church of England was basically Catholicism without the Pope. They were more comfortable mimicking the grandeur of the Catholics.

At least that's my take on it.

by Anonymousreply 408/26/2013

As R2 noted, the Protestants simply took over the already-built structures in their countries. And in emerging nations - colonially assimilated into the Christian "world," cathedrals of some size and scale were built by members of the Anglican community, as in Australia and North America. The occasional large-scale "cathedral" also can be seen among Presbyterians. However, other denominations, purposely turning from the centralized systems of Catholicism and the national Anglican and Lutheran denominations, have had neither the will, interest nor resources for that kind of grandeur.

Newer groups, such as the televangelism mega-churches, offer a contemporary take on cathedral building, but they are more like media centers and theaters with cafes and work-out centers than traditional sanctuaries.

by Anonymousreply 508/26/2013

Are they teaching anything in schools anymore?

by Anonymousreply 608/26/2013

Oh, R6 is such a smarty pants that he doesn't realize that we live in a secular world and no high school in America would broach this subject.

by Anonymousreply 708/26/2013

To add to r3, Episcopalians (and Anglicans) do have cathedrals. Each Episcopal diocese has a cathedral. Two cathedrals he/she mentioned are part of their respective Episcopal dioceses. Some Episcopal cathedrals are obviously more elaborate than others but not as fancy as the Roman Catholic ones.

by Anonymousreply 808/26/2013

R7, the UK is much more secular than the US and schools do teach about this shit. What's the US's excuse?

by Anonymousreply 908/26/2013

Wikipedia has a list of the Episcopal Cathedrals. Some are quite elaborate.

by Anonymousreply 1008/26/2013

So the Episcopalians lean two slabs against each other and call it a cathedral then? I think OP wanted to know why they did not have the grandeur of, let's say, a Chartres.

by Anonymousreply 1108/26/2013

As R4 stated, Protestantism was a reaction to the opulence of the Catholic Church.

by Anonymousreply 1308/26/2013

R11, I think R2, R3, R4, and R5 answered that question. My responses were to give an Episcopalian perspective. Our cathedrals aren't as elaborate because we actively channel resources into helping our communities and don't have nearly as many members or as much wealth as the Catholic Church. Also, each diocese is dependent upon funds from their parishes. Those funds pay the bishop and pay for the buildings and such. A diocese in New York will have more resources than one in Indiana, for example.

As noted, some of our cathedrals are fancy. Many are older though and are often on the site of the first Episcopal Church in the diocese. Of course some are newer ones built on the original sites. Look at ones that are located in dioceses that have affluent parishes. As a rule, our cathedrals aren't as spectacular as the ones the Roman Catholic Church built in centuries past. The ones they build now don't even compare to those. Some are downright gaudy.

The LDS (Mormons) build extravagant temples. Check them out. They're often tacky (in my opinion), but they can't be dismissed as insignificant.

by Anonymousreply 1408/26/2013

You need a healthy working class to build cathedrals. We kissed that environment a few times last century, but not in the last decade.

You also need a concentration of people with a shared background. Without that, you get tiny churches spread throughout an area.

Also, without a centralized bureaucracy, you get more divisions and splinter groups going off to create their own churches. Lutherans build brutalist steel mills whenever they break away from a synod. Baptists probably do the same.

Plus, geographically, this is a big fucking country with idiots populating based upon work rather than heritage. This means you'll have those Irish people messing with poor Albanians and the fucking Dutch. Each will need its own church.

by Anonymousreply 1508/26/2013

The other part of what R4 and R13 have said is that, in response to the iconoclasm of Protestant Reformation, Catholics doubled-down on their opulence with the Counter-Reformation. This gave rise to the Baroque style of art and architecture. They felt it made for good propaganda. Most people could not read and, even if they could, were discouraged from reading the Bible (for fear they'd "misinterpret" it). Through paintings and grand cathedrals, even someone who was illiterate could be exposed to The Church's vision of the divine.

by Anonymousreply 1608/26/2013

One last response. Here are photos of the LDS Temples around the world. It's their version of cathedrals, if that makes sense. Of course it's not a perfect parallel. I won't get into differences in beliefs. That's a whole other topic. I'm former LDS and an Episcopalian convert.

by Anonymousreply 1708/26/2013

[quote] Protestantism was, in part, a reaction against the wealth and opulence of the Catholic Church. Most Protestant sects saw the expense and indulgence of a fancy cathedral as arrogant ungodliness and wasteful idolatry.

Which is ironic, given the 'empty your pockets now!' approach of today's megachurches. The camel through the eye of a needle part of the bible is conveniently ignored.

by Anonymousreply 1808/26/2013

Why don't you filthy heathen protestant disbelievers post a few of your "cathedrals"?

HaHaHa! I am laughing on you! I am over the moon with laughter! I am LOL'ing all over myself on you!

by Anonymousreply 1908/26/2013

Never heard of the Crystal Cathedral, OP?

by Anonymousreply 2108/26/2013

In the US they're called mega-churches and, rather than art treasures, etc., the money is spent on elaborate sound and lighting systems, which dwarf anything on Broadway.

by Anonymousreply 2208/26/2013

R11 I love you for mentioning my favorite cathedral Chartres.

by Anonymousreply 2308/26/2013

OP is stupid. The highest church in the world, the cathedral in Ulm (Germany), is actually a protestant church.

by Anonymousreply 2408/26/2013

[quote]Never heard of the Crystal Cathedral, OP?

Which, oddly enough, has just been purchased by the Catholic Church.

by Anonymousreply 2508/26/2013

[quote]Instead of spending the money on, say, helping the poor in the community, or some sort of wonderful project, the church got itself new carpeting and paint (which were NOT needed, the place was in excellent shape). Selfish, greedy asshole.

One of the things they teach ministers is that the church needs debt. You always need to be improving, expanding, and building. It keeps the congregation motivated and giving, and it helps attract new members.

It's a lot easier to get Mrs. Gotrocks to write a check for a stained glass window than it is to get her to pay for a soup kitchen.

by Anonymousreply 2608/26/2013

[quote]So the Episcopalians lean two slabs against each other and call it a cathedral then?

This indicates you've never been to the National Cathedral in Washington, DC or Trinity Church in New York City. Both are spectacular examples of architecture and furnishings that equal many Catholic cathedrals.

by Anonymousreply 2708/26/2013

Interior of National Cathedral, Washington, DC

by Anonymousreply 2808/26/2013

Hey you pikers!

by Anonymousreply 2908/26/2013

[quote]Great Britain has plenty of non-Catholic cathedrals

Because they were almost all originally Catholic cathedrals. Have you heard of the Reformation? Lots of Protestant countries have cathedrals but they were almost all originally Catholic, like the countries themselves.

A true cathedral has a bishop assigned to it. Many Protestant "cathedrals" do not, especially if they don't follow an episcopal polity.

by Anonymousreply 3008/26/2013

Most of the stone masons working on the National Cathedral were brought over from Europe.

by Anonymousreply 3108/26/2013

Protestants were always penurious, thrift-conscience pilgrims. Think brown clothes and mayonnaise sandwiches and liquor. Lots of liquor.

by Anonymousreply 3208/26/2013

Trinity Church in New York City

by Anonymousreply 3308/26/2013

[quote]In the US they're called mega-churches

No, they're not. The US has plenty of actual cathedrals; Catholic, Orthodox and Episcopalian (Anglican). Mega-churches are something entirely different, modern and completely Protestant. Mega-churches are not the seat of a bishop, like a true Cathedral. Most of the Protestant denominations that run mega-churches don't even have bishops.

by Anonymousreply 3408/26/2013

Interior of Trinity Church

by Anonymousreply 3508/26/2013

[quote]Mega-churches are not the seat of a bishop,

I don't think OP's question was meant to be technical. I suspect he meant big churches, in which case many of the mega churches would qualify.

by Anonymousreply 3708/26/2013

[quote]Because they were almost all originally Catholic cathedrals. Have you heard of the Reformation?

Never heard of it. We needed you to explain, R30.

One of the most famous cathedrals in Great Britian is St. Paul's in London. Henry VIII died in 1547. Christopher Wren's plans for the cathedral were approved in 1675. Charles and Diana were married there in 1981.

by Anonymousreply 3808/26/2013

St. Paul's Cathedral.

by Anonymousreply 3908/26/2013

Trolldar says R4 is the same troll who has been posting that long long long long rant over and over and over again on practically every thread.

by Anonymousreply 4008/26/2013

What gets me is how the most beautiful architecture around the world is, for the most part, religious, despite religion being BS.

by Anonymousreply 4108/26/2013

Catholics do have the best religious paraphernalia. Attending mass at one of these magnificent buildings while incense and beautiful anthems fill the air is an extraordinary experience.

by Anonymousreply 4208/26/2013

The Frauenkirche in Dresden, the Berliner Dom, St. Michael's Church Hamburg all grand post-Reformation era Protestant churches in Germany.

by Anonymousreply 4308/26/2013

But they're not cathedrals. And Frauenkirche was originally Catholic.

by Anonymousreply 4408/26/2013

[quote]Protestants Created Nearly Nothing

Do you still stand by your claim, OP?

by Anonymousreply 4508/26/2013

The answer is so obvious - gays have run everything about the Catholic church forEVER.

by Anonymousreply 4608/26/2013

[quote]Oh, [R6] is such a smarty pants that he doesn't realize that we live in a secular world and no high school in America would broach this subject.

American public high schools can and do teach the history of religions as part of regular history classes, idiot; they just can't teach religious doctrine and beliefs, or advocate adherence to a particular religion.

by Anonymousreply 4708/26/2013

The Reformation and Counter-Reformation were major events in European history that had far-reaching consequences besides religious beliefs. They most certainly should be included in a secular education.

by Anonymousreply 4808/26/2013

Nobody builds Cathedrals like Chartes anymore because the context and political environment that spawned them is long gone. The "Cathedral" was far more than just a big church with a Bishop in it.

Plus I find modern Cathedrals like the national one in D.C. fail aesthetically for me because they are pretty much just a rehash of something that was radically modern design when it was built. The ages have rendered Chartes traditional, but it was shocking in it's modernity when it was built.

The catholic church hasn't abandoned innovation in religious architecture, but even they aren't building at the same level of investment and human resource that something like Chartes originally required.

I think the last really big Cathedral project was Sagrada Familia - which is Guadi, and last time I checked still isn't finished.

by Anonymousreply 4908/26/2013

Forgot to say, Protestants never had the ecclesiastical and political climate that made Cathedrals attractive prospects - even if they had been around during the heyday of Cathedral building.

No Church of England wasn't really "Protestant" until Elisabeth I. Henry just wanted a divorce - otherwise he was very much a Catholic.

by Anonymousreply 5008/26/2013

In my Long Island town, the Protestant churches were much nicer than the catholic churches. They are built of brick, have spires, choirs, stained glass windows. The catholic churches were made of wood and old rotting clapboard. There were two catholic churches -- the one the Irish and Poles went to and the one the Italians went to. The Protestant churches were on the main streets, but the Catholic churches were outside of the village/business district.

The Irish and Poles considered the Italians to be insane Mediterraneans because the Italians marched statues around in parades and had casino night. The Irish and Poles were comfortable with Bingo, but not casino night, which was way too gamble-y with its wheels of fortune. The Irish and Poles were fine with wearing scapulae and having holy cards and statues inside if the church, but did not believe in marching statues around in parades. They thought it was pagan.

The Italian church got condemned because of shoddy workmanship. The diocese decided to build a brick church, but it was far outside of town and they made it 1969s ultra-modern. It looked like a small airport hangar. The diocese also granted the Italians more say-so in running the church because their church had been torn down.

The Irish and Polish church became more Spanish. The Irish and Poles started attending mass in the new airport hangar church, but they never got into doing the things they used to do at the old church, like having Christmas fairs and bingo and fundraising dances and card parties.

So few people attend the hangar church now that masses in the wintertime are held in a teeny parking lot chapel. They can't afford to heat the church. Lots of children of Catholics became born again Protestant fundies and attend churches like The Jesus is Lord Church and the Life Community Church. The Catholic priests were never interested in getting to know the parishioners except for the big time contributors from the K of C.

The Protestant churches in town are doing fine.

by Anonymousreply 5108/26/2013

[quote]Catholics do have the best religious paraphernalia. Attending mass at one of these magnificent buildings while incense and beautiful anthems fill the air is an extraordinary experience.

If it's a show you want, go east. Almost any flavor of Eastern Orthodox puts the Roman Catholics to shame.

by Anonymousreply 5208/26/2013

Protestants teach you can have a personal relationship with God, so you don't need a building. Catholic cathedrals were intended as HOLY PLACES, parts of which the public were not allowed in. Furthermore, they were covered with statues and symbols because the people couldn't read, so the architecture was the lesson. They were also assembly places v. eastern religions where most of the public rituals happened outside and the temple was just shelter for the statues and they would do multiple buildings for the monks and officials.

by Anonymousreply 5308/26/2013

Girls, girls, you're all over-built.

by Anonymousreply 5408/26/2013

Mormon temples for rituals.

by Anonymousreply 5508/26/2013

Actually, the best architecture around the world is in schools, but in general the public are not allowed to visit them.

by Anonymousreply 5608/26/2013

A big part of Cathedrals was revenue. Politics, and my spire is bigger than yours.

by Anonymousreply 5708/26/2013

r56 being an Architect, and being unaware of that, perhaps you could clarify.

Some university architecture is pretty phenomenal, but so is the architecture of a lot of other kinds of institutions not to mention the private sector.

Plus I've never been turned away when visiting buildings at schools.

Or are you talking about the difference between vernacular (all that ivy and faux continental) and design (Mies and his ITT campus?)

by Anonymousreply 5808/26/2013

Oh R10 you crack me up! You know as well as the rest of us that Episcoples aren't a real religion at all!

by Anonymousreply 5908/26/2013

Has anyone read Ken Follett's historical novel, Pillars of the Earth? Or seen the mini series of the same name? Actually, I liked the book much better, because it was such a thoroughly researched historical novel, and it really demonstrated thru a work of fiction, how these great cathedrals evolved.

They were a departure from the basilicas that were eastern in their influence. St. Peter's in Rome is a good example of a basilica. The Chartres Cathedral, and Notre Dame in Paris, are a stark contrast to that. These Cathedrals were build in the 12th and 13th centuries and that in itself is a very remarkable achievement. I may be wrong, but I believe the earliest examples were in France.

by Anonymousreply 6008/26/2013

r59, go back to thumping your Bible. The Anglicans/Episcopals are right up there with the Catholics and the Orthodox in the Big 3 of Christianity.

by Anonymousreply 6108/27/2013

I wasn't talking about universities, but elementary, middle, junior high, high schools, lycees, gymnasiums, academies, etc., etc., etc.

They are for children and teachers, not visitors. They are spread throughout a town, so no set of buildings is more dispersed. They are occupied every day and usually represent the largest public investment a community makes. And, they are usually built by architects or planned by architects and show a greater degree of functionalism and symbolism than any other kind of building.

by Anonymousreply 6208/27/2013

[quote]elementary, middle, junior high, high schools,

In what country do you live where these schools are attractive?

by Anonymousreply 6308/27/2013

"I think the last really big Cathedral project was Sagrada Familia - which is Guadi, and last time I checked still isn't finished."

This one is:

by Anonymousreply 6408/27/2013

Cathedrals aka profit centers

by Anonymousreply 6508/27/2013

I'm with R63. Schools in America, at least public ones, are not at all known for their architecture. Private schools are different since these are for the affluent, but even private schools are just mimicking university architecture, so they aren't all that notable.

We don't have lycées in America, "academy" is just a fancy word that private schools use, and gymnasium is usually shortened to "gym" and refers specifically to a building or room used for athletics and physical training.

We have elementary schools, middle schools and high schools. Public schools are everywhere. Catholics also run their own schools known as "parochial" schools, they are sort of a step between public and private. Private schools are usually expensive and for the wealthy. There are other kinds of religious schools and charter schools, etc, but they're all roughly the same in terms of school architecture.

Public and parochial schools are either plain modern brick buildings or very old and not particularly noteworthy, architecturally speaking.

Below is a random image I found online of an American high school. It's actually pretty nice in terms of school architecture and is probably around 50+ years old, but this is about as good as public schools get. Hardly "the best" architecture. Modern schools are mostly plain, boxy structures where function trumps form.

by Anonymousreply 6608/27/2013

Try this one

by Anonymousreply 6708/27/2013

Or this one

by Anonymousreply 6808/27/2013

Or this one

by Anonymousreply 6908/27/2013

The Prods nicked all the Cathlick ones, so didn't need to bother building any of their own.

by Anonymousreply 7008/27/2013

Or this one if you like modern.

These are just four public high schools in my city. Most of them are similar.

by Anonymousreply 7108/27/2013

East Liberty Presbyterian Church, Pittsburgh

Riverside Church, New York

Saint John the Divine, New York

Grace Cathedral, San Francisco

by Anonymousreply 7208/27/2013

This one was quite influential in its day. Most American public schools are at least partly based on it.

by Anonymousreply 7308/27/2013

PS33 New York City, built in a historically interesting Dutch style

by Anonymousreply 7408/27/2013

Isn't this the largest Catholic edifice built lately?

by Anonymousreply 7508/27/2013

Still, OP has a point. What protestant church has ever been able to compete with this?

by Anonymousreply 7608/27/2013

The National Cathedral in DC has some interesting secular aspects. One of the windows depicts the moonwalk and has a moon rock installed in the stained glass design.

The numerous grotesques and gargoyles that decorate the exterior are mostly from the imagination of the stone carvers. One depicts the likeness of the master stone carver, Roger Morigi. There were two competitions for the public to submit gargoyle and grotesque designs. That's why a grotesque on the northwest tower depicts Darth Vader.

by Anonymousreply 7708/27/2013

Roman Catholic England had beautiful cathedrals.

Then it became Church of England (not Protestant I know, but it serves the same illustrative purpose).

It still had beautiful cathedrals. It didn't need to build any more.

by Anonymousreply 7808/27/2013

R73 posts a photo of the Auschwitz crematorium and calls it a church or something. Good try.

by Anonymousreply 7908/28/2013

Most schools today are just rows of cinderblock boxes.

by Anonymousreply 8008/28/2013

Opulence smpopulence. Truth is that the Catholic Church is the largest charitable organization on the planet and the third largest in America.

by Anonymousreply 8108/28/2013

Nonsense R82. Roughly two-thirds of the budget of Catholic Charities comes from government. They are feeding at the public trough and claiming credit for charity our taxes paid.

by Anonymousreply 8208/28/2013

R79 is well aware that is a public school in a Jewish community, hence the inappropriate reference to Auschwitz.

by Anonymousreply 8308/29/2013


by Anonymousreply 8408/29/2013

It's also the largest homophobic cabal of closeted homosexuals, pedophiles and misogynists that the world has ever seen, R81! They preach about helping the poor, while closing schools and churches in poor neighborhoods, despite owning the largest art collection in the world! But yes, they're SO charitable.

The charity in the Catholic Church comes from the people in the pews, plus a handful of good nuns and lowly priests. The hierarchy that they mindlessly support is an entirely different thing.

by Anonymousreply 8508/29/2013

I think you'll find that Protestant and Anglicans were the driving force behind the Industrial Revolution...

So much for "creating nothing"...

by Anonymousreply 8608/29/2013

The Frauenkirche of Dresden as was a catholic parish r44 before the reformation but became a Lutheran congregation in 1559. The 15th century gothic building was torn down in 1727 to build a bigger church. The baroque style 18th century church destroyed in WWII (now reconstructed) has always been a Lutheran church.

by Anonymousreply 8708/29/2013

Add the London churches of Sir Christopher Wren - all built after Catholicism....

by Anonymousreply 8808/30/2013
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!