Sienna Miller: I Won't Take New Roles Unless They're Spectacular
Sienna Miller pops her keys in her mouth after loading up her daughter Marlowe, 13 months, in their car on Wednesday (August 14) in London, England.
The 31-year-old actress recently spoke about not taking on new acting roles right now because she wants to focus on being a mom.
“I felt, having done that [recent film Foxcatcher], that unless it’s of that calibre, it’s not worth not being with my baby… Unless it’s something spectacular, I really want to be a mother,” Sienna told the Evening Standard. “I have technically been on a break…I vowed to take the rest of the year off.
|by Anonymous||reply 42||08/18/2013|
Maybe if anyone knew who she is, we would care about her decision. She is merely one of the interchangeable parts that is the young Hollywood female. They're all the same and not memorable.
|by Anonymous||reply 1||08/15/2013|
bitch please. You're not a spectacular actress. I didn't know of the hussy until she was involved in that homewrecking affair a few years ago.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||08/15/2013|
She's the perfect example of someone the industry tried to make happen over and over until they realized nobody gave a fuck. I've never seen someone trying so hard at having a personality and coming off so blank. At least people sort of know who Gretchen Mol is.
|by Anonymous||reply 3||08/15/2013|
Gretchen Mol is a great character actress.
Sienna is a blob of nothing.
|by Anonymous||reply 4||08/15/2013|
Don't hold your breath, bitch!
|by Anonymous||reply 5||08/15/2013|
His fiance is hot, if I were her I'd spend all my time making babies with him!
|by Anonymous||reply 6||08/16/2013|
Sure, honey, not working is YOUR idea.
She's just another spoiled rich girl who thought she could buy/fuck her way into movie stardom. Someone should have told her she's not photogenic, talented, or charismatic, and spared her all this trouble.
|by Anonymous||reply 7||08/16/2013|
[all posts by ham-fisted troll a removed.]
|by Anonymous||reply 8||08/16/2013|
I have absolutely no idea who this chick is. Don't tell me they spun off "Brenda" from "Rhoda" and I missed the whole "Ugly Sidekick" thing... Gosh, I should get out more.
|by Anonymous||reply 9||08/16/2013|
She got quite a big pay-off from the Rupert Murdoch phone-hacking scandal last year - more than she ever earned from acting, so she probably does not need to "act" any more.
I saw her on the stage in London 2 years ago in that "Flare Off" revival - both she and James Purefoy were totally inadequate in the leads, one could barely hear them, and they had no charisma whatsoever.
Miller has always been known best for her love life and the guys she was being fucked by - Jude Law, on and off for years; and that married man she was carrying on with where she was seen as a homewrecker. She even had a fake romance with Matthew Rhys to promote that film they made which nobody was interested in.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||08/17/2013|
If Sienna takes the role it will no longer be a spectacular role.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||08/17/2013|
Joe Manganiello feels the same way. Joe has been offered some spectacular movie roles but his hectic schedule filming "True Blood" prevents him from taking these roles.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||08/17/2013|
What? Her career's been over for years.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||08/17/2013|
[quote]it’s not worth not being with my baby
|by Anonymous||reply 14||08/17/2013|
Yeah, because working 30 days a year for millions of dollars is such a sacrifice.
That, and the odd shill (see link) in the afternoon.
Thanks for letting us know why you "disappeared all of a sudden." We sure will notice when you're gone.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||08/17/2013|
I had no idea her settlement from Murdoch was that good.
I will always remember Sienna from The September Issue where Anna Wintour was absolutely aghast at her cover subject's dirty hair and pointy teeth.
I don't think Sienna has ever been on cover again.
|by Anonymous||reply 16||08/17/2013|
"I Won't Take New Roles Unless They're Spectacular."
I remember when I thought I could sell this bravado. Work is hard.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||08/17/2013|
Coincidentally, I won't sell rolls unless they're spectacular.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||08/17/2013|
[all posts by ham-fisted troll a removed.]
|by Anonymous||reply 19||08/17/2013|
I can't believe she's only 31. I feel like she's been around forever.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||08/17/2013|
That's rich, coming from an actress who has been completely forgettable in every single role she's ever tackled.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||08/17/2013|
If only Jen Aniston felt the same way.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||08/17/2013|
She has the role of generic 'wife' in Foxcatcher, so I don't know what she's talking about.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||08/17/2013|
I thought she did a good job playing Edie Sedgwick.
|by Anonymous||reply 26||08/17/2013|
Don't forget her Tippi Hedren in that BBC film about Hitchcock and the making of The Birds and Marnie!
She must have got that role as they could make her up to look reasonably like Tippi.
|by Anonymous||reply 27||08/17/2013|
I didn't know who she was before seeing the September Issue and was unpleasantly surprised by how ugly she is without ten pounds of foundation on her face.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||08/17/2013|
Link to the September issue and pointy teeth please!
|by Anonymous||reply 29||08/17/2013|
Didn't she bang that girl in the GI Joe movie she starred in with?
|by Anonymous||reply 30||08/17/2013|
Oh, they're real... and they're spectacular.
|by Anonymous||reply 31||08/17/2013|
Around how much did she make off the phone hacking settlement?
|by Anonymous||reply 32||08/17/2013|
[quote]The 31-year-old actress recently spoke about not taking on new acting roles right now because she wants to focus on being a mom.
And when she's tired of focusing on "being a mom" she'll be SHOCKED there are no more movie roles being offered her and proceed to blame her agent.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||08/17/2013|
I am sure it was about £100,000 English sterling - not an inconsiderable amount (from the phone hacking scandal). I am sure she would not have earned that much from any of her movie roles.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||08/18/2013|
Considering her lifestyle, I doubt that amount would last long. For a regular person, yes. For Sienna, and her trips, clothes, parties, etc....
I guess that's why she and her little boyfriend signed on for those ugly Burberry ads.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||08/18/2013|
"Considering her lifestyle, I doubt that amount would last long. For a regular person, yes. For Sienna, and her trips, clothes, parties, etc...."
Like many modern actors, I believe she comes from money.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||08/18/2013|
She comes from money. I believe her mother or close relative is a casting director as well.
Say what you want about her, she was the person who brought Murdoch's phone hacking scandal to light and pressed charges. I admire her for that. Celebrity or not, people still have rights and should be protected against criminal activity. As the investigation went on, the public finally realised it wasn't just celebrities whose rights and privacy were being violated.
She also recently received Golden Globe and BAFTA nominations for The Girl.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||08/18/2013|
plus she's regularly shagging the guy everyone on DL (mistakenly) though was Robert Pattinson's boyfriend.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||08/18/2013|
She's a good actress generally, but as others note, she's no better than several dozen other actresses her age. I frequently get her and Kate Bosworth mixed up.
|by Anonymous||reply 40||08/18/2013|
That's right Sienna, they can't dump you if you dump them first.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||08/18/2013|